A brief assessment of object semantics in primary progressive aphasia

Background: A cross-culturally valid nonverbal assessment of semantic knowledge is needed. Accurately identifying impairment of object semantics is important for diagnosis of several disorders, including distinguishing semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), a neurodegenerative condition characterised by progressive impairment in word comprehension, from logopenic and nonfluent agrammatic variants, which are not associated with impaired object semantics. However, current assessments require culturally specific knowledge.

Aims: We developed a cross-culturally valid short form of the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test to assess object semantic memory. We investigated its clinical utility in differentiating the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, from the logopenic and nonfluent agrammatic variants. Areas of atrophy associated with poor performance were identified.

Methods & Procedures: Fourteen items that rely on knowledge of objects’ defining features were selected from the original 52-item version. The full and short forms were administered to healthy individuals in the US (N = 18), Argentina (N = 20), and Greece (N = 12) and performance was compared. Seventy-eight individuals with primary progressive aphasia in the US completed the short form. Behavioural performance of the svPPA group (N = 24) was compared to other variants. Atlas-based analysis identified regions where atrophy correlated with poor performance in 39 individuals with primary progressive aphasia who had high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Outcomes & Results: Control performance was classified as normal on the short form significantly more often than on the full version. Across groups with primary progressive aphasia, the group with semantic variant performed significantly worse than the groups with logopenic or nonfluent agrammatic variants. Volume in left anterior and inferior temporal cortex correlated with performance.

Conclusions: The short-form Pyramids and Palm Trees Test is a clinically relevant, cross-culturally valid assessment of nonverbal object semantics. It can be used to identify semantic impairments, with poor performance associated with atrophy of the temporal lobes.     

Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia

We performed a comprehensive cognitive, neuroimaging, and genetic study of 31 patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a decline in language functions that remains isolated for at least 2 years. Detailed speech and language evaluation was used to identify three different clinical variants: nonfluent progressive aphasia (NFPA; n = 11), semantic dementia (SD; n = 10), and a third variant termed logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA; n = 10). Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) on MRIs showed that, when all 31 PPA patients were analyzed together, the left perisylvian region and the anterior temporal lobes were atrophied. However, when each clinical variant was considered separately, distinctive patterns emerged: (1) NFPA, characterized by apraxia of speech and deficits in processing complex syntax, was associated with left inferior frontal and insular atrophy; (2) SD, characterized by fluent speech and semantic memory deficits, was associated with anterior temporal damage; and (3) LPA, characterized by slow speech and impaired syntactic comprehension and naming, showed atrophy in the left posterior temporal cortex and inferior parietal lobule. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 haplotype frequency was 20% in NFPA, 0% in SD, and 67% in LPA. Cognitive, genetic, and anatomical features indicate that different PPA clinical variants may correspond to different underlying pathological processes.     

Differential diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia variants using the international criteria

Background: Based upon the profile linguistic and speech deficits, the current International Criteria for diagnosis and classification of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) suggest the distinction of semantic, nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic variants, each of which is commonly associated with specific pathology and distribution of brain atrophy. Although the vast majority of cases fit in this tripartite schema, some cases remain unclassifiable because of the presence of overlapping deficits, or conversely, because of the presence of isolated deficits.

Aims: In this review, we describe relevant clinical features that characterise each variant and discuss emerging issues derived from the application of the International Criteria.

Main Contribution: Based on a hierarchical approach that comprises the evaluation of single-word comprehension, motor speech disorder, agrammatism and sentence repetition, we propose a heuristic solution aimed to reduce the number of cases with ambiguous identification and thereby optimise the application of the current International Criteria.

Conclusions: Despite the clinical heterogeneity of cases with PPA, the current International Criteria, together with the proposed heuristic solution, provide a valid framework into which the vast majority of cases can be classified. The development of robust clinical markers aimed to distinguish cases with motor speech disorders from those with logopenic variant remains clinically challenging.     

The New Classification of Primary Progressive Aphasia into Semantic,Logopenic, or Nonfluent/Agrammatic Variants

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA), typically resulting from a neurodegenerative disease such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration or Alzheimer’s disease, is characterized by a progressive loss of specific language functions with relative sparing of other cognitive domains. Three variants of PPA are now recognized: semantic variant, logopenic variant, and nonfluent/agrammatic variant. We discuss recent work characterizing the neurolinguistic, neuropsychological, imaging and pathologic profiles associated with these variants. Improved reliability of diagnoses will be increasingly important as trials for etiology-specific treatments become available. We also discuss the implications of these syndromes for theories of language function.     

The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia

The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia [also referred to as logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA)] is the most recently identified variant of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). This disorder, characterized by a unique speech and language profile, occurs due to damage to specific anatomical areas. An international panel of experts has established a set of diagnostic criteria for PPA and its clinical variants. The clinical diagnostic criteria for the logopenic variant include core features such as impaired single-word retrieval in spontaneous speech and impaired repetition of sentences and phrases. Additional features, of which at least 3 are essential for diagnosing the logopenic variant, include phonological errors in speech, spared single-word comprehension and object knowledge, spared motor speech, and lack of frank agrammatism. For a next imaging-supported diagnosis, the aforementioned clinical features must be accompanied by imaging findings revealing atrophy, hypoperfusion, or hypometabolism in the left temporo-parietal junction area. Finally, a pathology-confirmed case of the logopenic variant requires a clinical diagnosis of the syndrome accompanied by histopathological data or the presence of a known pathogenic mutation. Studies have clarified the clinical phenotype of this disorder, suggesting a prominent impairment of the phonological working memory. Several studies have provided evidences of a possible link between the logopenic phenotype and the specific pathological and genetic correlates. The diagnostic guidelines will enable a more accurate identification of the individuals with the logopenic variant, thus facilitating the documentation of the course of illness and, ultimately, the underlying pathological substrate in this patient group via the pathology-confirmed series.     

The patterns of progression in primary progressive aphasia—Implications for assessment and management

Background: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a progressive language disorder with preserved cognitive function for at least 2 years from onset. The main variants currently distinguished are: non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA), semantic (svPPA), and logopenic (lvPPA). Patients with initial language presentation may subsequently develop other symptoms, such as behavioural dysfunction or apraxia. The clinical pattern of PPA depends on the location of atrophy, the underlying pathology, and the stage of the disease.

Aims: This review aims at characterising longitudinal changes in clinical presentations of different PPA variants and at presenting implications of these changes for the assessment, diagnosis, and management.

Main contribution: The three PPA variants differ not only in terms of language impairment, but also with regard to cognitive and behavioural profile. Apraxia and rigidity frequently occur in the course of nfvPPA. Patients with lvPPA seem to follow the pattern of aphasic Alzheimer’s disease, where language impairment is accompanied by episodic memory deficit. Individuals diagnosed with svPPA often develop behavioural dysfunction similar to that observed in behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

Conclusions: Implications for patient care are dependent on PPA variant and on the stage of the disease. In svPPA, emphasis should be on the management of semantic and behavioural problems in daily life. Caregivers of nfvPPA patients should be informed about the possible emergence of apraxia and other movement disorders. In contrast, families of individuals with lvPPA should be made aware of and trained to cope with an episodic memory decline and possible progression to other varieties of PPA.     

Primary progressive aphasia: diagnosis, varieties, evolution.

A referred cohort of 67 clinically defined PPA patients were compared to 99 AD patients with formal language and nonverbal cognitive tests in a case control design. Language fluency was determined at the first and last follow up visits. Quantitation of sulcal and ventricular atrophy on MRI was carried out in 46 PPA and 53 AD patients. Most PPA patients (57%) are relatively fluent when first examined. Visuospatial and memory functions are initially preserved. Aphemic, stuttering, "pure motor" presentation, or agrammatic aphasia are seen less frequently. Later most PPAs become logopenic and nonfluent, even those with semantic aphasia (dementia). In contrast, AD patients were more fluent and had relatively lower comprehension, but better overall language performance. MRI showed significant left sided atrophy in most PPA patients. Subsequent to PPA, 25 patients developed behavioral manifestations of frontotemporal dementia and 15 the corticobasal degeneration syndrome, indicating the substantial clinical overlap of these conditions. Language testing, particularly fluency scores supported by neuroimaging are helpful differentiating PPA from AD. The fluent-nonfluent dichotomy in PPA is mostly stage related. The aphemic-logopenic-agrammatic and semantic distinction is useful, but the outcomes converge.     

Dissociations Between Fluency And Agrammatism In Primary Progressive Aphasia

BACKGROUND: Classical aphasiology, based on the study of stroke sequelae, fuses speech fluency and grammatical ability. Nonfluent (Broca's) aphasia often is accompanied by agrammatism; whereas in the fluent aphasias grammatical deficits are not typical. The assumption that a similar relationship exists in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) has led to the dichotomization of this syndrome into fluent and nonfluent subtypes. AIMS: This study compared elements of fluency and grammatical production in the narrative speech of individuals with PPA to determine if they can be dissociated from one another. METHOD: Speech samples from 37 individuals with PPA, clinically assigned to agrammatic (N=11), logopenic (N=20) and semantic (N=6) subtypes, and 13 cognitively healthy control participants telling the "Cinderella Story" were analyzed for fluency (i.e., words per minute (WPM) and mean length of utterance in words (MLU-W)) and grammaticality (i.e., the proportion of grammatically correct sentences, open-to-closed-class word ratio, noun-to-verb ratio, and correct production of verb inflection, noun morphology, and verb argument structure.) Between group differences were analyzed for each variable. Correlational analyses examined the relation between WPM and each grammatical variable, and an off-line measure of sentence production. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Agrammatic and logopenic groups both had lower scores on the fluency measures and produced significantly fewer grammatical sentences than did semantic and control groups. However, only the agrammatic group evinced significantly impaired production of verb inflection and verb argument structure. In addition, some semantic participants showed abnormal open-to-closed and noun-to-verb ratios in narrative speech. When the sample was divided on the basis of fluency, all the agrammatic participants fell in the nonfluent category. The logopenic participants varied in fluency but those with low fluency showed variable performance on measures of grammaticality. Correlational analyses and scatter plots comparing fluency and each grammatical variable revealed dissociations within PPA participants, with some nonfluent participants showing normal grammatical skill. CONCLUSIONS: Grammatical production is a complex construct comprised of correct usage of several language components, each of which can be selectively affected by disease. This study demonstrates that individuals with PPA show dissociations between fluency and grammatical production in narrative speech. Grammatical ability, and its relationship to fluency, varies from individual to individual, and from one variant of PPA to another, and can even be found in individuals with semantic PPA in whom a fluent aphasia is usually thought to accompany preserved ability to produce grammatical utterances.     

Longitudinal study of single‐word comprehension in semantic dementia: A comparison with primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease

Background: Although semantic dementia (SD) is characterised by a multimodal loss of semantic knowledge, it has been demonstrated that lexical‐semantic representations are not equally disrupted in SD and that some categories may be recognised better than others. Little is known, however, about the pattern of the category‐specific comprehension deficits in SD and whether it differs from that of other forms of progressive aphasias.

Aims: This exploratory study aimed to investigate the evolution of category‐specific deficits of single‐word comprehension in progressive aphasias.

Methods & Procedures: A total of 19 patients with a clinical diagnosis of SD, 25 patients with primary progressive aphasia with agrammatic and relatively nonfluent speech (PPA), and 25 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) with aphasia were studied longitudinally with the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). The Auditory Word Recognition subtest of the WAB was utilised to assess comprehension of words derived from different semantic categories.

Outcomes & Results: The analysis revealed that, over time, category‐specific deficits of single‐word comprehension were seen in all three groups of patients. Participants with SD as well as those with PPA and AD were impaired on both pointing to fingers and the right–left orientation task. However, patients with SD were the only group that showed defective recognition of their own body parts. Interestingly, individuals with SD had no difficulties identifying colours, letters, and numbers, even during the follow‐up testing. In addition, in all three groups the extent of category‐specific deficits was associated with the severity of aphasia.

Conclusions: These results indicate that category‐specific deficits of single‐word comprehension are frequently seen not only in patients with SD but also in individuals with PPA or AD, and that the extent of these deficits is associated with the severity of aphasia. However, the pattern of these deficits is often different in these three forms of neurodegenerative conditions and more dissociations between semantic categories are observed as each of these diseases progresses.     

Validating new diagnostic imaging criteria for primary progressive aphasia via anatomical likelihood estimation meta‐analyses

Recently, diagnostic clinical and imaging criteria for primary progressive aphasia (PPA) have been revised by an international consortium (Gorno‐Tempini et al. Neurology 2011;76:1006‐14). The aim of this study was to validate the specificity of the new imaging criteria and investigate whether different imaging modalities [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET)] require different diagnostic subtype‐specific imaging criteria. Anatomical likelihood estimation meta‐analyses were conducted for PPA subtypes across a large cohort of 396 patients: firstly, across MRI studies for each of the three PPA subtypes followed by conjunction and subtraction analyses to investigate the specificity, and, secondly, by comparing results across MRI vs. FDG‐PET studies in semantic dementia and progressive nonfluent aphasia. Semantic dementia showed atrophy in temporal, fusiform, parahippocampal gyri, hippocampus, and amygdala, progressive nonfluent aphasia in left putamen, insula, middle/superior temporal, precentral, and frontal gyri, logopenic progressive aphasia in middle/superior temporal, supramarginal, and dorsal posterior cingulate gyri. Results of the disease‐specific meta‐analyses across MRI studies were disjunct. Similarly, atrophic and hypometabolic brain networks were regionally dissociated in both semantic dementia and progressive nonfluent aphasia. In conclusion, meta‐analyses support the specificity of new diagnostic imaging criteria for PPA and suggest that they should be specified for each imaging modality separately.     

Functional disability in primary progressive aphasia

Background: In primary progressive aphasia (PPA), assessment of language predominates over assessment of functional impairment in activities of daily living (ADLs) in clinical and research environments. Most of the knowledge on functional disability in PPA relies largely on anecdotal experience and limited numbers of studies published to date.

Aims: (1) To describe the different patterns of ADL functional disability in the main PPA variants: semantic variant, nonfluent aphasia, and the more recently defined logopenic variant; (2) to draw relations between functional disability, cognitive, and behavioural symptoms in the PPAs; (3) to examine the impact of functional disability on carer burden, and (4) to provide specific strategies to address the described problems.

Main Contribution: Profiles of disease progression are described from a functional perspective, as well as the relationship (or lack thereof) between functional disability and cognitive and behavioural symptoms. Dementia-management strategies for carers and professionals in overcoming day-to-day difficulties are provided, and the impact of functional deficits on those around the patient, including their spouses and children, are discussed.

Conclusions: Patterns of ADL functional disability and their progression vary between PPA subtypes. Understanding these different profiles of impairment is critical to the development of tailored interventions. There is a range of therapeutic strategies which can be trialled to promote improved ADL functioning, which in turn may also help in reducing levels of carer burden in PPA.     

Fractional Anisotropy in Three Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

Objective: Our aim was to report diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) patterns in three patients, each with a different primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variant. Design: One agrammatic PPA, one semantic PPA, and one logopenic PPA subject underwent a magnetic resonance imaging examination including DTI sequences. The fractional anisotropy (FA) value was calculated in regions of interest (ROIs) involved in these three variants (perisylvian region, temporal pole, and parietotemporal junction) for each patient. Left-right FA ratios in each ROI were compared between PPA subjects and a group of three amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients with a cerebrospinal fluid biomarker profile of the Alzheimer type. Results: The FA values were lower in the left hemisphere (p = 0.03). The lowest FA values were observed in the left perisylvian region for the non-fluent/agrammatic subtype PPA patient, in the left anterior temporal lobe for the semantic subtype PPA patient, and in the left parietotemporal junction for the logopenic patient (p = 0.028). The left-right FA ratio in these specific ROIs for each PPA variant was significantly lower than in the amnestic mild cognitive impairment group (p = 0.009). Conclusion: DTI patterns could be an effective new tool for diagnosing PPA and classifying the three variants.     

Afasia progresiva primaria: del síndrome a la enfermedad

Introduction

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome characterised by a progressive decline in language and speech of neurodegenerative origin. Major breakthroughs made in recent years have lent us a better understanding of this syndrome, which may be the first manifestation of any of a number of neurodegenerative diseases.

Development

We reviewed the main aspects of PPA epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, aetiology and treatment. Most cases manifest sporadically and the typical age of onset is between 50 and 70 years. Three clinically distinct variants have been described: nonfluent or agrammatic PPA, semantic PPA and logopenic PPA. Each of these variants tends to be associated with specific histopathological findings, but clinical diagnostic methods are imperfect predictors of underlying pathology. Anatomical and functional neuroimaging can provide useful biomarkers. Several treatments have been proposed, and while no clear benefits have been demonstrated, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may be useful, especially in the logopenic variant.

Conclusions

PPA is an emerging syndrome which may be more prevalent than we might expect. It was previously listed as part of the frontotemporal dementia spectrum, and it is also related to Alzheimer disease. Clinical diagnosis, complemented by a biomarker evaluation, may predict the underlying pathology, which in turn will improve treatment possibilities.     

Reading disorders in primary progressive aphasia: A behavioral and neuroimaging study

Previous neuropsychological studies on acquired dyslexia revealed a double dissociation in reading impairments. Patients with phonological dyslexia have selective difficulty in reading pseudo-words, while those with surface dyslexia misread exception words. This double dissociation in reading abilities has often been reported in brain-damaged patients, but it has not been consistently shown in patients with neurodegenerative diseases.In this study, we investigated reading impairments and their anatomical correlates in various neurodegenerative diseases. First, we performed a behavioral analysis to characterize the reading of different word types in primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Then, we conducted a voxel-based morphometry neuroimaging study to map the brain areas in which gray matter volume correlated with the accurate reading of exception and pseudo-words.The results showed a differential pattern of exception and pseudo-word reading abilities in different clinical variants of PPA. Patients with semantic dementia, a disorder characterized by selective loss of semantic memory, revealed a pattern of surface dyslexia, while patients with logopenic/phonological progressive aphasia, defined by phonological loop deficits, showed phonological dyslexia. Neuroimaging results showed that exception word reading accuracy correlated with gray matter volume in the left anterior temporal structures, including the temporal pole, the anterior superior and middle temporal and fusiform gyri, while pseudo-word reading accuracy correlated with left temporoparietal regions, including the posterior superior and middle temporal and fusiform gyri, and the inferior parietal lobule.These results suggest that exception and pseudo-word reading not only rely upon different language mechanisms selectively damaged in PPA, but also that these processes are sustained by separate brain structures.     

Parkinsonian motor features distinguish the agrammatic from logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia

BackgroundFew studies have assessed parkinsonian motor features across variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Our objective was to compare degree of parkinsonian motor features between two PPA variants.MethodsParkinsonian motor features were assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale in prospectively recruited PPA subjects, classified based on recently published criteria. Comparisons across groups were performed with Fisher's exact test for binary data and Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data.ResultsTwenty-three PPA subjects were diagnosed with logopenic (n = 11) or nonfluent/agrammatic (n = 12) aphasia. There were no significant differences in illness duration (agrammatic = 3.4 years; logopenic = 3.3 years) or age at onset (nonfluent/agrammatic = 67.3; logopenic = 62.0), but those with logopenic aphasia were more impaired on Mini-Mental State Examination (21.7/30 points vs. 26.1/30; p = 0.04). In contrast, those with logopenic aphasia had fewer parkinsonian motor features than those with agrammatic aphasia (5.7/132 vs. 16.8/132; p = 0.003) which was driven by bradykinesia (p = 0.02) and speech facial/expression (p = 0.04); less so rigidity (p = 0.06). Dysarthria was more frequent in the nonfluent/agrammatic subgroup.ConclusionsNonfluent/agrammatic subjects have more parkinsonian motor features than logopenic subjects, likely reflecting underlying tau pathology in the agrammatic variant.     

原发性进行性失语的临床、影像及语言特征

目的 探讨原发性进行性失语（PPA）的临床、影像及语言特征.方法 PPA患者7例,其中语义性痴呆（SD）6例,进行性非流利性失语（PNFA）1例,收集患者的人口学资料、病史,进行头MRI检查,采用汉语失语成套测验进行语言评估.结果 患者平均发病年龄56岁,均缓慢起病,以语言表达、命名障碍为首发症状.MRI示左侧颞极萎缩为主,病程长的患者左侧额叶和顶叶、右侧颞叶也明显萎缩.语言评估发现所有患者的自发语言、复述、命名、听理解、阅读和书写均不同程度损害.SD患者言语流利,复述、朗读能力下降相对较轻,命名、复杂语句的理解能力损害突出.PNFA言语顿挫吃力,患者列名能力明显下降,但命名相对保存完好.结论 PPA多为老年前期发病,语言障碍为最早、最突出的症状.MRI特征性的改变为额叶和颞极萎缩,左侧为著.其中SD表现为命名性失语和经皮质感觉性失语,PNFA表现为经皮质运动性失语的特征.     

The genetics of primary progressive aphasia

Background: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a disorder in which language impairment is the initial and predominant symptom. Three main phenotypes are described, the nonfluent variant (nfvPPA), the semantic variant (svPPA) and the logopenic variant (lvPPA). Although PPA is most commonly a sporadic disorder, recent studies have shown an association of PPA with mutations in a number of genes.

Aims: To understand the extent to which PPA may be inherited, which genetic mutations may cause it, and whether the phenotypes of genetic PPA differ from sporadic PPA.

Main Contribution: In around 20–30% of patients with PPA, a family history is present although nfvPPA is more heritable than svPPA and lvPPA which are both usually sporadic disorders. Mutations in the progranulin (GRN) and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72), genes are the major causes of genetic PPA.

Conclusions: Key pointers that may suggest testing for a GRN mutation in PPA are a family history of one of the disorders within the frontotemporal dementia spectrum, a nfvPPA phenotype, particularly if presenting with a prominent anomia and asymmetrical fronto-temporo-parietal atrophy. In someone with nfvPPA and a family history, GRN should be tested initially but a search for hexanucleotide repeat expansions in the C9orf72 gene should be performed if negative, particularly if there are features of motor neurone disease, or a family history of someone with motor neurone disease. Mutations in other genes are only very rare causes of PPA but if GRN and C9orf72 are both negative, testing for mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), valosin-containing protein (VCP) and presenilin 1 (PSEN1) should be considered.     

Language,executive function and social cognition in the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia syndromes

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) represents a spectrum of non-Alzheimer's degenerative conditions associated with focal atrophy of the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Frontal and temporal regions of the brain have been shown to be strongly involved in executive function, social cognition and language processing and, thus, deficits in these domains are frequently seen in patients with FTD or may even be hallmarks of a specific FTD subtype (i.e. relatively selective and progressive language impairment in primary progressive aphasia). In this review we have attempted to delineate how language, executive function, and social cognition may contribute to the diagnosis of FTD syndromes, namely the behavioural variant FTD as well as the language variants of FTD including the three subtypes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA): non-fluent/agrammatic, semantic and logopenic. This review also addresses the extent to which deficits in these cognitive areas contribute to the differential diagnosis of FTD versus Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Finally, early clinical determinants of pathology are briefly discussed and contemporary challenges to the diagnosis of FTD are presented.     

Patterns of decline in naming and semantic knowledge in primary progressive aphasia

Background: Individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and their caregivers want to know what to expect so that they can plan support appropriately. The ability to predict decline in naming and semantic knowledge, and advise individuals with PPA and their caregivers regarding future planning, would be invaluable clinically.

Aims: The aims of this study were to investigate patterns of decline in naming and semantic knowledge in each of the clinical variants of PPA (logopenic variant PPA, lvPPA; nonfluent agrammatic PPA, nfaPPA; and semantic variant PPA, svPPA) and to examine the effects of other variables on rate of decline. We hypothesized that speech-language rehabilitation, higher education, and higher baseline test scores would be associated with slower decline, and older age with faster decline.

Methods and Procedures: A total of 94 participants with PPA underwent language testing, including 36 participants with lvPPA, 31 participants with nfaPPA, and 27 participants with svPPA. All participant groups were similar in age and education. We focused on decline on three tests: the short form of the Boston Naming Test (BNT), the Hopkins Assessment of Naming Actions (HANA), and the short form of the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (PPTT).

Outcome and Results: Across language tests, the most precipitous rates of decline (loss of points per month) occurred in nfaPPA, followed by svPPA, then lvPPA. Female sex, longer symptom duration, higher baseline test score, and speech-language rehabilitation were associated with slower decline.

Conclusions: PPA variants were distinguishable by rapidity of decline, with nfaPPA having the most precipitous decline. As hypothesized, higher baseline test scores and speech-language rehabilitation were associated with slower decline. Surprisingly, age and education were not important prognostically for individuals in this study. Further study of prognostically-relevant variables in PPA is indicated in this population.