Ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization with or without the "long" gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: effect on cycle duration and outcome

OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation between stimulation duration of IVF cycles, with and without GnRH agonist (GnRH-a), and cycle outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data. SETTING: University-affiliated IVF clinic. PATIENT(S): 998 IVF cycles in which long GnRH-a protocol was used, and 155 cycles with hMG only. INTERVENTION(S): IVF cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cycle outcome in number of oocytes and embryos, and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): The mean stimulation duration (+/-SD) was 9.6+/-1.7 and 6.7+/-1.0 for the GnRH-a and the hMG-only cycles, respectively (P<0.01). In the GnRH-a group, no statistically significant correlation between cycle duration and pregnancy rate was found. Interestingly, the patients treated for 9 days had the highest number of oocytes retrieved and the highest pregnancy rate. Stimulation duration was not affected by age in either protocol. GnRH-a cycles yielded a significantly higher number of oocytes and embryos compared to cycles without GnRH-a. The pregnancy rate was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): Stimulation duration in the long GnRH-a protocol group was significantly longer than in the hMG-only group. Stimulation duration was not affected by age. No statistically significant correlation was found between stimulation duration and cycle outcome in the long protocol group.     

The comparison of two gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in an in vitro fertilization program.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a), buserelin acetate and leuprolide acetate [LA], used in combination with gonadotropins in ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. SETTING: Assisted Reproduction Unit of the Hospital Clínic i Provincial in Barcelona. PATIENTS: Thirty-five pairs of IVF patients who were matched on age, indication, and number of attempts. These women were randomized to receive either buserelin acetate plus gonadotropins (group B) or LA plus gonadotropins (group L). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Luteolysis, ovarian response, and IVF outcome. RESULTS: The mean time for total ovarian arrest and the total dose of gonadotropins and estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration were similar in the two groups of patients. The number of follicles punctured, the number of oocytes retrieved, and the percentage of mature oocytes in group L were significantly higher. The number of embryos suitable for replacement and cryopreservation was higher in group L compared with group B approaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Our results warrant further studies to compare different GnRH-a as therapeutic tools in IVF.     

Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance of ganirelix acetate for the inhibition of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). DESIGN: Phase III, multicenter, open-label randomized trial. SETTING: In vitro fertilization (IVF) centers in North America. PATIENT(S): Healthy female partners (n = 313) in subfertile couples for whom COH and IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were indicated. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to receive one COH cycle with ganirelix or the reference treatment, a long protocol of leuprolide acetate in conjunction with follitropin-beta for injection. OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rates, endocrine variables, and safety variables. RESULT(S): The mean number of oocytes retrieved per attempt was 11.6 in the ganirelix group and 14.1 in the leuprolide group. Fertilization rates were 62.4% and 61.9% in the ganirelix and leuprolide groups, respectively, and implantation rates were 21.1% and 26.1%. Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 35.4% and 30.8% in the ganirelix group and 38.4% and 36.4% in the leuprolide acetate group. Fewer moderate and severe injection site reactions were reported with ganirelix (11.9% and 0.6%) than with leuprolide (24.4% and 1.1%). CONCLUSION(S): Ganirelix is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Compared with leuprolide acetate, ganirelix therapy has a shorter duration and fewer injections but produces a similar pregnancy rate.     

Comparison of a single half-dose, long-acting form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) and a short-acting form of GnRH-a for pituitary suppression in a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation program

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a single low-dose leuprolide acetate depot (LA depot) and leuprolide acetate (LA) on pituitary down-regulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). DESIGN: Retrospective study.Setting: An IVF unit of an academic medical center. PATIENT(s): Women who underwent COH and IVF-ET. INTERVENTION(s): Pituitary down-regulation with half-dose LA depot (1.88 mg sc, group 1) or LA (0.5 mg/d sc, group 2) was started on menstrual days 21-23. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(s): The concentrations of estradiol (E(2)), FSH, LH, gonadotropin dosages, the numbers of oocytes retrieved, oocytes fertilized and embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates of the two groups were compared. RESULT(s): A total of 289 patients in group 1 and 158 in group 2 were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline concentrations of E(2) and FSH, concentrations of E(2), FSH, and LH during hCG administration, gonadotropin dosage, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of oocytes fertilized and embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates. CONCLUSION(s): Single half-dose LA depot offers a useful alternative for pituitary suppression in ovarian stimulation for IVF.     

Simplification of the clinical phase of IVF and ICSI treatment in programmed cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success of a protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation allowing patient self-selection into groups for ovulation stimulation planned 8 weeks and more in advance following cycle synchronization, drug self-administration as well as a reduced number of folliculometries. METHODS: A total of 714 patients received the same stimulation protocol. In 260 cases GnRH-a was applied daily and in 454 as depot. In all patients FSH-HP was self-administered subcutaneously for ovarian stimulation. In 316 patients IVF and in 398 patients ICSI was performed. RESULTS: The delivery rate per started cycle was higher in patients receiving depot GnRH-a in the IVF and ICSI group (30.2 vs. 23.4) than in those receiving subcutaneous GnRH-a (20.2 vs. 22.1). CONCLUSION: Programming of the IVF/ICSI cycle greatly simplifies treatment. A comparison of pregnancy rate and delivery rate per cycle between depot and subcutaneous daily application of GnRh-a did not confirm any statistically significant difference.     

GnRH analogs: depot versus short formulations

Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) are widely used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproduction (ART). Two different formulations are now available: short formulations and depot formulation. Some authors have suggested that depot GnRH-a induce a too high pituitary suppression and have put forward protocols using reduced GnRH-a doses. A reduced dose of daily triptorelin is enough for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation but provides no significant improvement in IVF cycle outcome when compared with depot formulation in normally responding women. However, it seems to improve ovarian response and overall results in poor responding patients. Low doses of short GnRH-a allow shorter treatment, requiring lower amounts of gonadotropins. This possibility should be considered in view of its economic advantage.     

Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist who were undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and endocrinological effects of intranasal (IN) vs. subcutaneous (SC) GnRH-a for pituitary down-regulation combined with hMG vs. rFSH. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University hospital, IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Three hundred seventy-nine normogonadotropic women eligible for IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Randomization to intranasal (IN) or SC GnRH-a and to hMG or rFSH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocytes retrieved, embryos developed, clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates. Serum hormone concentrations on stimulation days 1 (S1) and 8 (S8), and oocyte pick-up (OPU) day. RESULT(S): After randomization, four groups were formed: IN/hMG (n = 100), IN/FSH (n = 98), SC/hMG (n = 89), and SC/FSH (n = 92). Mean number of oocytes retrieved and of transferable and transferred embryos were similar in the four groups. Clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle was significantly higher in the IN/HMG group than in the SC/FSH group (P<.05) and was intermediate in the two remaining groups. Se-LH on S8 in the two SC groups was significantly lower than in the two IN groups. Se-E2 on S8 in the SC/FSH group was significantly lower than in the other three groups. CONCLUSION(S): The clinical and endocrinological outcome in IVF and ICSI-treated normogonadotropic women is significantly influenced by mode of down-regulation as well as gonadotropin formulation.     

Prospective, randomized, controlled study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with a single dose of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist (cetrorelix) or a depot formula of an LH-RH agonist (triptorelin)

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the value of a single dose of 3 mg of cetrorelix in preventing the occurrence of premature LH surges. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized, prospective study. SETTING: Reproductive medicine units. PATIENT(S): Infertile patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF-ET. INTERVENTION(S): A single dose of 3 mg of cetrorelix (Cetrotide; ASTA Medica, Frankfurt, Germany) (115 patients) was administered in the late follicular phase. A depot preparation of triptorelin (Decapeptyl; Ipsen-Biotech, Paris, France) was chosen as a control agent (39 patients). Ovarian stimulation was conducted with hMG (Menogon; Ferring, Kiel, Germany). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Premature LH surges (LH level >10 IU/L), progesterone level greater than 1 ng/L, and IVF results. RESULT(S): No LH surge occurred after cetrorelix administration. The patients in the cetrorelix group had a lower number of oocytes and embryos. The percentage of mature oocytes and fertilization rates were similar in both groups, and the pregnancy rates were not statistically different. The length of stimulation, number of hMG ampules administered, and occurrence of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were lower in the cetrorelix group. Tolerance of cetrorelix was excellent. CONCLUSION(S): A cetrorelix single-dose protocol prevented LH surges in all patients studied. It compares favorably to the "long protocol" and could be a protocol of choice in IVF-ET.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin for triggering follicular maturation in in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for triggering the final stage of follicular maturation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: In vitro fertilization outcome was determined in a randomized, prospective study. SETTING: The University of Toronto IVF program at The Toronto Hospital, Toronto General Division. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: One hundred seventy-nine women in the IVF program were given a subcutaneous injection of leuprolide acetate (500 micrograms) or an intramuscular injection of hCG (5,000 IU) 34 to 36 hours before oocyte retrieval. Vaginal progesterone (P) suppositories (50 mg) were used two times a day for luteal phase support. A subgroup of 41 women had serum estradiol (E2) and P levels determined 2 and 7 days after embryo transfer (ET). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy rates and luteal phase E2 and P were compared. RESULTS: In the GnRH-a group, there were 18 pregnancies from 84 ETs (20%). In the hCG group, there were 19 pregnancies from 95 ETs (19%). Luteal phase E2 and P levels were significantly lower in the GnRH-a group compared with the hCG group, and 18% of the former group had an apparent short luteal phase. CONCLUSIONS: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist appears to be an effective alternative to hCG for inducing follicular maturation in IVF. The lower luteal phase E2 concentrations may potentially be beneficial in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation and for enhancing implantation. Better luteal phase support or a different dose of GnRH-a is needed to prevent luteal phase deficiency.     

Microdose follicular phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) compared with luteal phase GnRH-a for ovarian stimulation at in vitro fertilization

Objective: To compare an ovarian stimulation protocol using microdose follicular phase GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) and oral contraceptive (OC) pills to a luteal phase GnRH-a protocol.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: University affiliated IVF program.

Patient(s): One hundred seventy patients who underwent IVF and ET in 1996.

Intervention(s): Patients were assigned to either a midluteal start of leuprolide acetate (LA) 1 mg/d, reduced to 0.5 mg/d after addition of gonadotropins (LUT), or OC pills until cycle day 0 followed by 20 μg of LA every 12 hours on cycle day 3 with addition of gonadotropins on cycle day 5 (MICRO).

Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of FSH ampules, days of stimulation, peak E₂, and number of oocytes retrieved.

Result(s): There were no statistically significant differences in the main outcome measures between the two groups using an age-matched ANOVA. Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle start was not statistically different (LUT = 54%, and MICRO = 37%). The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the MICRO group (22.5% vs. 8.2%).

Conclusion(s): Given the higher cancellation rate in the microdose group, a randomized clinical trial is required to determine the possible benefit of a lower dose of GnRH-a in patients with normal ovarian function.     

两种控制性超促排卵方案在卵巢低反应患者中的临床研究

目的:探讨标准长方案与拮抗剂方案控制性超促排卵(COH)周期在卵巢低反应(POR)患者中的临床效果。方法:通过对POR患者行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)的191个周期进行回顾性分析,其中GnRH-a长方案85个周期(A组),拮抗剂方案106个周期(B组),比较组间的临床资料及助孕结局。结果:A组的hCG注射日内膜厚度、获卵数、MII卵子数、可移植胚胎数、活产分娩率均高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);A组的优质胚胎数、胚胎种植率、移植周期妊娠率均高于B组,A组的周期取消率、流产率均低于B组,但差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:标准长方案对卵巢低反应患者有较好的治疗效果;标准长方案可提高患者获卵数、可移植胚胎数、活产分娩率。     

Clinical outcome of using ganirelix acetate versus a 4-day follicular phase leuprolide acetate protocol in unselected women undergoing in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in unselected patients undergoing IVF using multidose ganirelix acetate versus 4 days of administration of leuprolide acetate. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A fertility and IVF center. PATIENT(S): Two hundred forty-seven women who underwent COH-IVF between April 1, 1999, and January 30, 2001. INTERVENTION(S): Pituitary suppression according to a 4-day follicular phase leuprolide acetate protocol (236 women) or a multidose ganirelix acetate regimen (133 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Amount of gonadotropin used, days of stimulation, cancellation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Compared with leuprolide acetate recipients, ganirelix recipients required significantly less gonadotropin and the mean day of hCG administration was 4 days earlier. Among women younger than 35 years of age, the implantation rate (15% vs. 6%) and the clinical pregnancy rate per initiated and transferred cycle (27% vs. 12% and 32% vs. 15%, respectively) were significantly higher in the ganirelix group than the leuprolide acetate group. CONCLUSION(S): Compared with a 4-day leuprolide acetate protocol, COH-IVF using a multidose ganirelix acetate protocol reduces treatment duration and amount of gonadotropin used. In younger women, the latter protocol is associated with significantly better pregnancy and implantation rates.     

The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for all patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Is there any medical advantage? A prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) for all patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) produces any significant medical advantage. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. PATIENTS: Three hundred eight patients having their first ever IVF attempt. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly divided into four groups and received either human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) alone for ovarian simulation (group A, n = 81); clomiphene citrate and hMG (group B, n = 77); a 3-day ultrashort course of GnRH-a and hMG (group C, n = 74); or pituitary desensitization with GnRH-a followed by hMG (group D, n = 76). RESULTS: The indications for IVF and mean age of all four groups of patients were comparable. There was a significant difference in the number of embryos cleaved and transferred among the groups, but there were no significant differences in the cancellation rate, mean number of oocytes collected or fertilized, and number of cases of failed fertilization. There were also no significant differences in the pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle commenced or per embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: The routine use of GnRH-a for all patients undergoing IVF has practical but no significant medical advantages.     

The long protocol of administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is superior to the short protocol for ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pituitary desensitization with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a), buserelin acetate, before the administration of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) is superior to the simultaneous administration of both hormones at the beginning of the treatment cycle. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. PATIENTS: Ninety-one patients having their first attempt at IVF. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in group 1 (long protocol) were administered subcutaneous (SC) buserelin acetate 200 micrograms/d from day 1 of the menstrual cycle, and hMG was started only after pituitary desensitization had been achieved at least 14 days later. Patients in group 2 (short protocol) were administered SC buserelin acetate 200 micrograms/d from day 2 and the same dose of hMG used in the long protocol from day 3 of the menstrual cycle. RESULTS: The median total amount of hMG required in both groups was comparable. There were significantly more follicles (P = 0.0001), oocytes (P = 0.0008), fertilized oocytes (P = 0.0001), and cleaved embryos (P = 0.0001), and a higher fertilization rate (P = 0.0047) in patients in group 1. The pregnancy rates per initiated cycle and per embryo transfer were 19.57% and 25.71% in group 1 compared with 8.89% and 16.67% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The long protocol is superior in terms of significantly greater follicular recruitment, oocyte recovery and fertilization rates, and significantly greater number of embryos available for transfer. In general, it is the preferred method when GnRH-a are used for ovarian stimulation in IVF.     

Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of endometrial preparation with exogenous steroids, without pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, in women with normal ovarian function. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Private outpatient infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-six women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. INTERVENTION(S): In group 1 (146 patients), depot GnRH agonist was administered in the luteal phase; treatment with 17beta-estradiol transdermal patches at steadily increasing dosage from 100 to 300 microg was then given for at least 12 days. In group 2 (150 patients), endometrial preparation began on day 1 of menstrual cycle. The starting dose was 200 microg; this was increased to 300 microg after 7 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy, abortion, implantation and cancellation rates. RESULT(S): In group 2, six cycles (4%) were cancelled due to evidence of ovulation. Groups were similar in the percentage of embryos that survived freezing-thawing (77.1% in group 1 and 76.6% in group 2) and in the number of embryos transferred per patient (2.1 +/- 0.6 and 2.1 +/- 0.7, respectively). Groups 1 and 2 did not differ significantly in rates of pregnancy (19.7% and 24.1%), abortion (17.8% and 11.7%), and implantation (10.4% and 11.9%). CONCLUSION(S): Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer based exclusively on steroid administration appears to be as effective as the more conventional protocol involving preliminary desensitization with a GnRH agonist. This simplified protocol reduces costs, minimizes pharmacologic treatment, and increases patient compliance.     

Comparison of stimulation with clomiphene citrate in combination with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone to stimulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: a prospective,randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To compare IVF-ET outcome with a new stimulation protocol using clomiphene citrate (CC) with recombinant FSH and LH to stimulation with the standard long GnRH-a protocol. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Outpatient infertility clinic in Vienna, Austria. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-four infertile women undergoing IVF-ET; 154 IVF cycles stimulated with CC + recombinant FSH + recombinant LH (group A) and 140 cycles with long GnRH-a suppression + recombinant FSH (group B). INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, egg retrieval, and ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cycle parameters (number of oocytes, fertilization, number of embryos) and outcome (pregnancy rate, cancellation rate, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [OHSS]). RESULT(S): Pregnancy rate per ET was 42.9% (implantation rate, 21.3%) in group A and 36.6% (17.4%) in group B. Cancellation rates were similar. The OHSS occurred in four cases (3%) in group A and 12 cases (10%) in group B. CONCLUSION(S): Stimulation with CC + recombinant FSH + recombinant LH leads to comparable pregnancy rates vs. the long protocol. With this new stimulation, less gonadotropins are used and there is less need for monitoring (lower cost for patient and clinic). The risk of OHSS is reduced as well. Therefore, this protocol should be regarded as the first-line treatment.     

Performance of cryopreserved pre-embryos obtained in in vitro fertilization cycles with or without a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the viability and potential for pregnancy of cryopreserved/thawed pre-embryos obtained after ovarian stimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) adjunct therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical evaluation of all patients receiving a gonadotropin ovarian stimulation protocol (follicle-stimulating hormone/human menopausal gonadotropin [FSH/hMG]) with/without GnRH-a. SETTING: Academic tertiary clinical care unit. PATIENTS: Patients receiving leuprolide acetate (LA)/FSH/hMG (n = 136: LA in the luteal phase; long protocol) were compared with patients receiving FSH/hMG alone (n = 130) within the same time-frame in our program (April 1987 through October 1989). INTERVENTIONS: All patients had both a cycle in which pre-embryos were transferred fresh and a cycle of thaw of cryopreserved pre-embryos (frozen at the pronuclear stage in a slow freeze-thaw protocol using 1,2 propanediol) transferred in monitored natural cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Groups were similar in age, etiology of infertility, and cycle day 3 serum FSH levels; a significantly higher (P less than 0.001) number of preovulatory oocytes was recovered in the GnRH-a group. Both groups of patients were transferred an equal number of pre-embryos at the time of IVF. Cycles with frozen/thawed pre-embryos were evaluated based on the analysis of the three main variables that demonstrate cryopreservation efficiency: survival rate, implantation rate, and term pregnancy rate (PR). RESULTS: Non-GnRH-a group (113 transfers): pre-embryo survival, 71.5%; PR/transfer, 24.7%; implantation rate, 16.0%; GnRH-a group (125 transfers): pre-embryo survival 71.6%; PR/transfer, 32.8%; implantation rate, 12.0% (no significant differences). CONCLUSIONS: The use of GnRH-a produced pre-embryos of equal aptitude for development after cryopreservation at the pronuclear stage when compared with a similar gonadotropin stimulation treatment without GnRH-a.     

Is blastocyst transfer useful as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple in vitro fertilization failures?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blastocyst transfer is of benefit to patients with multiple IVF failures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The George Washington University Medical Center. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IVF between October 1, 1997, and November 30, 1998, who had previously undergone three or more unsuccessful IVF cycles. Patients who had at least three embryos at the 8- to 12-cell stage available on day 3 were eligible for the study. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were given the option of day 3 ET (group A) or blastocyst transfer (group B). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blastocyst-formation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per transfer, and implantation rate per transfer. RESULT(S): Groups A and B were similar in terms of age, the number of previous failed IVF cycles, fertilization rate, and the number of fertilized oocytes per cycle. The blastocyst-formation rate was 51.0%. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates per transfer were statistically significantly higher in the blastocyst-transfer group. There were no multiple pregnancies after blastocyst transfer. CONCLUSION: Blastocyst transfer increases implantation rates and PRs in patients with multiple failed IVF cycles, without increasing the risk of multiple pregnancy.     

低剂量长、短效达菲林在控制性超促排卵中的疗效比较

目的:探讨低剂量长、短效达菲林在控制性超促排卵中的垂体降调效果及临床结局。方法:选择IVF-ET患者206例,均于前一月经周期黄体中期开始注射达菲林。随机分为3组,A组:n=100,长效达菲林1.25 mg;B组:n=56例,注射短效达菲林0.05 mg/d,至hCG日;C组:n=50,注射短效达菲林0.1 mg/d,至Gn日改为0.1 mg/次,qod至hCG日。结果:①Gn使用天数及用量:A组(11.6±2.5 d,2591.2±287.2 IU)显著多于B组(10.1±2.6 d,2198.6±383.4 IU)和C组(10.4±2.2 d,2 156±306.4 IU)(P<0.05)。②降调后Gn启动日血清LH值:A组为1.23±0.25 IU/L,B组为2.9±0.37 IU/L,C组为2.39±0.54 IU/L,A组显著低于C组,C组显著低于B组(P均<0.01)。③hCG注射日LH值:A组(1.48±0.12 IU/L)显著低于B组(2.50±0.34 IU/L)和C组(2.90±0.90 IU/L)(P<0.01)。④获卵数、成熟卵子数、优质胚胎数及临床妊娠率A组均明显高于B组和C组(P<0.01)。结论:长效达菲林1.25 mg垂体降调效果及临床结局均优于短效达菲林组。     

A prospective randomized comparison between long and discontinuous-long protocols of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for in vitro fertilization

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of a discontinuous-long protocol in an IVF program.

Design: Prospective randomized study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patient(s): One hundred thirty-seven IVF cycles of 92 patients in an outpatient IVF program from April 1995 to December 1995.

Intervention(s): In the discontinuous-long protocol group (n = 68), GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) was administered from the luteal phase until cycle day 7, when pure FSH administration was begun. In the long protocol group (n = 69), GnRH-a was administered until the day before hCG administration.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum LH and ovarian steroid hormone levels, and IVF outcome.

Result(s): The period and the total dosage of hMG were increased in the discontinuous-long protocol group. Although the fertilization rate was similar under both protocols, the number of embryos transferred was smaller and the cancellation rate was higher in the discontinuouslong protocol group because of the greater failure of oocyte retrieval and fertilization. Serum E₂ levels in the late follicular phase were lower in the discontinuous-long protocol group.

Conclusion(s): Early discontinuation of GnRH-a is not beneficial because of its adverse effects on follicular development.