腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对患者术后应激反应及疼痛的影响

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）对患者术后并发症及疼痛的影响。 方法收集2018年4~11月收治的128例腹股沟斜疝患者,随机数表法分为TAPP组（64例）和对照组无张力疝修补术（64例）。比较2组临床指标、应激激素水平、疼痛情况和并发症。 结果TAPP组术后下床时间、术后疼痛持续时间和平均住院时间均低于对照组（P<0.05）,2组患者的术后进食时间无明显统计学差异（P>0.05）。与术前比较,术后3 d 2组皮质醇（Cor）和醛固酮（ALD）水平均升高（P<0.05）,对照组去甲肾上腺素（NE）水平显著升高（P<0.05）。术后3 d,TAPP组Cor、NE和ALD水平低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。与术后24 h比较,术后72 h 2组简式疼痛问卷表（SF-MPQ）评分和视觉模拟评分（VAS）均降低（P<0.05）,且TAPP组VAS评分和SF-MPQ评分低于对照组（P<0.05）。 结论TAPP手术是治疗腹股沟疝的有效手段,与无张力疝修补术相比在减少术后疼痛和并发症方面具有明显优势,术后应激反应较低。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与开放无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝临床对比研究

目的 探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与开放无张力疝修补术(OTFH)治疗腹股沟斜疝(斜疝)的临床效果.方法 前瞻性纳入2018-06—2019-11间固始县人民医院普外科行斜疝修补的患者,依据手术方法分为TAPP组和OTFH组.比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况、术后临床指标.统计2组患者术前和术后24 h的血清...     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对男性患者术后疼痛和生殖功能影响的前瞻性随机对照研究

目的探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术手术对患者术后疼痛情况及生殖功能的影响。 方法选择2016年1月至2017年10月在新疆医科大学第一附属医院肝脏·腹腔镜外科进行腹腔镜手术治疗的150例男性腹股沟患者。按照数字表法,随机分为腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）组和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）组,每组75例。观察和比较2组患者的手术指标、疼痛、精液质量、复发和并发症发生情况。手术时间、术后住院时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛时间、住院费用、疼痛数字评分（NRS）、腹股沟疼痛调查问卷评分（IPQ）、精液质量均为计量资料,使用均数±标准差（ ±s）表示,组内比较使用配对t检验,组间比较使用独立样本t检验。复发及并发症发生均为计数资料,使用频数表示,采用卡方检验进行比较。 结果TEP组患者的手术时间、术后住院时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛时间、住院费用均与TAPP组相比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;术后1年TEP组患者的α-葡萄糖苷酶（α-Glu）、果糖（Fru）及酸性磷酸酶（ACP）水平均高于TAPP组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;术后2组患者的NRS评分、IPQ评分、并发症发率和术后1年复发率的比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。 结论经腹腹膜前疝修补术和完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝具有相同的安全性,尽管两种术式对男性精液中α-Glu、Fru及ACP水平影响存在差异,但对男性患者生殖功能并无明显影响。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的术后疼痛分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝术后疼痛的原因及治疗方法。方法:回顾分析2009年5月至2015年2月为1 036例患者行TAPP的临床资料,总结分析患者年龄、手术时期、钉枪固定等指标。结果:1 036例均顺利完成TAPP,无一例中转开腹。术后发生疼痛89例,发生率8.6%。不同手术时期、应用钉枪钉合与免钉合术后疼痛差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同年龄、U形钉与螺旋钉固定TAPP术后疼痛差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:手术标准化是减少或避免TAPP术后疼痛的根本方法,必要的心理安慰、合适的治疗方式是治疗的关键。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝30例效果分析

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟复发疝的效果。方法回顾性分析2017-12—2019-06间在郑州市第七人民医院普外科接受TAPP治疗的30例腹股沟复发疝患者的临床及随访资料。结果 30例患者均成功完成TAPP。手术时间(48.20±6.40)min,术后下床活动时间(16.16±3.18)h,住院时间(5.70±2.10) d。术后出现尿潴留2例,阴囊血清肿1例,未发生切口感染、异物反应、顽固性疼痛等并发症。术后随访6～24个月,无复发病例。结论腹腔镜TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝,创伤小、并发症少,术后恢复快、复发率低,但远期效果仍需更长时间的随访结果予以验证。     

成人腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的治疗效果研究

目的 探讨成人腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的治疗效果.方法 回顾性分析2018-10—2019-10间在平顶山市第一人民医院普外科行疝修补术治疗的79例成人腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料.按手术方法分为TAPP组(40例)和开放无张力疝修补术组(OTFH组,39例).比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况和术后临...     

腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿影响的前瞻性研究

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿的影响。方法采用前瞻性研究方法。选取2017年10月至2019年3月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的128例男性原发性腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组,患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘,设为试验组;患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端游离于腹腔,设为对照组。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后血清肿、切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发情况。随访时间截至2019年6月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。结果筛选出符合条件的男性患者128例;平均年龄为61岁,年龄范围为47~74岁。128例患者中,试验组60例,对照组68例。(1)手术情况:试验组和对照组患者手术时间分别为(102±34)min和(97±30)min,住院费用分别为(12813±2390)元和(12125±2205)元,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.907,1.685,P>0.05)。(2)随访情况:128例患者均获得随访。试验组和对照组术后发生血清肿分别为8例和8例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.072,P>0.05)。试验组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为20 mL(4~31 mL),对照组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为43 mL(23~98 mL),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.013,P<0.05)。试验组和对照组发生血清肿患者术后3个月均无切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发。结论TAPP术中疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘和将残端游离于腹腔均能有效修补腹股沟斜疝。疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘可减少术后血清肿抽液量。     

Combined open and laparoscopic approach to chronic pain following open inguinal hernia repair

Introduction: Chronic groin pain is the most common long-term complication after open inguinal hernia repair. Traditional surgical management of the associated neuralgia consists of injection therapy followed by groin exploration, mesh removal, and nerve transection. The resultant hernia defect may be difficult to repair from an anterior approach. We evaluate the outcomes of a combined laparoscopic and open approach for the treatment of chronic groin pain following open inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods: All patients who underwent groin exploration for chronic neuralgia after a prior open inguinal hernia repair were prospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, type of prior hernia repair, and prior nonoperative therapies were recorded. The operation consisted of a standard three trocar laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair, followed by groin exploration, mesh removal, and nerve transection. Outcome measures included recurrent groin pain, numbness, hernia recurrence, and complications. Results: Twelve patients (11 male and 1 female) with a mean age of 41 years (range 29–51) underwent combined laparoscopic and open treatment for chronic groin pain. Ten patients complained of unilateral neuralgia, one patient had bilateral complaints, and one patient complained of orchalgia. All patients failed at least two attempted percutaneous nerve blocks. Prior repairs included Lichtenstein (n=9), McVay (n=1), plug and patch (n=1), and Shouldice (n=1). There were no intraoperative complications or wound infections. With a minimum of 6 weeks follow up, all patients were significantly improved. One patient complained of intermittent minor discomfort that required no further therapy. Two patients had persistent numbness in the ilioinguinal nerve distribution but remained satisfied with the procedure. Conclusions: A combined laparoscopic and open approach for postherniorrhaphy groin pain results in good to excellent patient satisfaction with no perioperative morbidity. It may be the preferred technique for the definitive management of chronic neuralgia after prior open hernia repair.     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的疗效对比研究

【摘要】〓目的〓比较腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的优缺点。方法 对2012年5月~2013年5月中山市中医院240例成人腹股沟疝修补术进行回顾性分析,其中开放性疝修补术(开腹疝修补组)148例,腹腔镜疝修补术(腔镜疝修补组)92例。收集两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后复发、术后慢性疼痛、术后阴囊积液及术后感染的临床资料并进行比较。 结果 开腹疝修补组患者在平均手术时间、平均住院费用少于腔镜疝修补(P均<0.01);开腹疝修补组术后复发(3例)、术后慢性疼痛(11例)、术后阴囊积液(2例)及术后感染(1例)等总并发症高于腔镜疝修补组(P<0.05);两组的平均住院时间差异无统计学意义。结论 腔镜组腹股沟疝修补术具有较少的术后并发症,但在住院时间、住院费用方面没有优势。     

Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

Background: Controversy exists regarding whether it is necessary to secure the mesh prosthesis during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, or port-site hernia. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing stapled with nonstapled laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repairs in a series of 502 consecutive patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair at two institutions between January 1995 and March 1997. Results: In all, 263 nonstapled and 273 stapled repairs were performed in 502 patients. Patients were evaluated at a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 1–32 months) by independent surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recurrence (0 to 263 nonstapled, 3 to 273 stapled; chi-square p= 0.09). The overall recurrence rate was 0.6%. There was no significant difference in operative time, port-site hernia, chronic pain or neuralgia between the two groups. Conclusion: It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair, allowing a reduction in the size of the ports. Received: 28 July 1998/Accepted: 25 November 1998     

Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial

Background As part of a large prospective randomized Austrian multicenter trial evaluating recurrence rates and complications of open and laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs we assessed postoperative pain and quality of life. Methods Approximately 151 patients were randomized to Shouldice repair, Bassini operation, or laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP). Pain was recorded preoperatively and on the first four postoperative days. Quality of life was recorded preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. Results Patients having Shouldice repairs had significantly higher visual analog-scale scores for pain on the fourth postoperative day (P=0.048) and significantly higher scores in McGill pain questionnaires on the first four postoperative days (P=0.046) compared with the other groups. Apart from a significantly lower score in postoperative bodily pain in the Shouldice group (P=0.039), no significant differences in quality of life were apparent among the three methods. Conclusions The TAPP and Bassini repairs result in less short-term postoperative pain.     

单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外操作与开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术的对比研究

目的比较单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外操作与开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析我院2015年1月~2015年6月收治的50例男性单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,年龄18~63岁,中位年龄37岁,所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。患者术前均经超声及临床体格检查,确诊为腹股沟疝。21例行单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝无张力修补术,29例行开放无张力疝修补术治疗,比较两种术式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症、术后24小时及慢性疼痛(1月以上)、总住院费用等临床疗效。结果单孔腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、术后平均住院时间及术后24小时疼痛率显著低于开放组,差异有显著性(P0.05);而在总住院费用方面,开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术组显著低于SILS-TEP组,差异有显著性,有统计学意义(P0.05);而二者在慢性疼痛(1月以上)和术后并发症方面没有显著性差异(P0.05)。结论采用单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝无张力修补术的患者术后恢复较好,临床效果明显优于开放性无张力修补术。     

Wound cosmesis problems and other postoperative problems of laparoscopic compared to open paediatric inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis research was executed to appraise the wound cosmesis problems and other postoperative problems of laparoscopic compared to open paediatric inguinal hernia (IH) repair. Inclusive literature research until March 2023 was done and 869 interconnected researches were revised. The 11 picked researches enclosed 3718 paediatric inguinal hernia were in the utilised researches' starting point, 1948 of them were utilising laparoscopic IH repairs, and 1770 were utilising open IH repairs. Odds ratios (ORs) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilised to appraise the wound cosmesis problems and other postoperative problems of laparoscopic compared to open paediatric IH repairs by dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. Laparoscopic IH repairs had significantly lower wound cosmesis problems (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.52, P < .001), metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03–0.49, P = .003), recurrence (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.34–0.99, P = .04) and postoperative problems (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17–0.73, P = .005), and higher wound score (OR, 12.80; 95% CI, 10.09–15.51, P < .001) compared to open paediatric IH. Laparoscopic IH repairs had significantly lower wound cosmesis problems, MCIH, recurrence, and postoperative problems, and a higher wound score compared to open paediatric IH. However, when interacting with its values, caution must be taken since much of the research had low sample sizes.