腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的术后疼痛分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝术后疼痛的原因及治疗方法。方法:回顾分析2009年5月至2015年2月为1 036例患者行TAPP的临床资料,总结分析患者年龄、手术时期、钉枪固定等指标。结果:1 036例均顺利完成TAPP,无一例中转开腹。术后发生疼痛89例,发生率8.6%。不同手术时期、应用钉枪钉合与免钉合术后疼痛差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同年龄、U形钉与螺旋钉固定TAPP术后疼痛差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:手术标准化是减少或避免TAPP术后疼痛的根本方法,必要的心理安慰、合适的治疗方式是治疗的关键。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝30例效果分析

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟复发疝的效果。方法回顾性分析2017-12—2019-06间在郑州市第七人民医院普外科接受TAPP治疗的30例腹股沟复发疝患者的临床及随访资料。结果 30例患者均成功完成TAPP。手术时间(48.20±6.40)min,术后下床活动时间(16.16±3.18)h,住院时间(5.70±2.10) d。术后出现尿潴留2例,阴囊血清肿1例,未发生切口感染、异物反应、顽固性疼痛等并发症。术后随访6～24个月,无复发病例。结论腹腔镜TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝,创伤小、并发症少,术后恢复快、复发率低,但远期效果仍需更长时间的随访结果予以验证。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与开放无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝临床对比研究

目的 探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与开放无张力疝修补术(OTFH)治疗腹股沟斜疝(斜疝)的临床效果.方法 前瞻性纳入2018-06—2019-11间固始县人民医院普外科行斜疝修补的患者,依据手术方法分为TAPP组和OTFH组.比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况、术后临床指标.统计2组患者术前和术后24 h的血清...     

成人腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的治疗效果研究

目的 探讨成人腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的治疗效果.方法 回顾性分析2018-10—2019-10间在平顶山市第一人民医院普外科行疝修补术治疗的79例成人腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料.按手术方法分为TAPP组(40例)和开放无张力疝修补术组(OTFH组,39例).比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况和术后临...     

免固定腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术107例

正腹股沟疝是由腹股沟区腹壁薄弱、缺损引起,是外科常见疾病之一。随着腹腔镜技术水平的日益提高,自2014年3月我们在开放腹膜前疝修补的基础上开始行免固定腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP),至2015年1月共完成107例,效果良好,并总结出部分操作技巧,现报道如下。1资料与方法1.1临床资料2014年3月至2015年1月我们共完成107     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的学习曲线

目的:探讨具有熟练腹腔镜基础操作技术的医师开展腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的学习曲线。方法:回顾分析2016年1月至2017年9月由同一术者完成的60例腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床资料,不包括双侧及复发性腹股沟疝。根据开展手术的顺序分为6组,每组10例,比较各组手术时间、中转开腹情况、术中出血量、术中术后并发症、术后住院时间等指标。结果:6组患者年龄、中转开腹率、术中出血量、术中术后并发症及术后住院时间差异无统计学意义,从第1组到第6组手术时间逐渐缩短:(120.7±21.4)min、(110.5±16.5)min、(101.2±10.3)min、(93.5±10.2)min、(79.9±9.3)min、(69.7±8.5)min。前4组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05),第5组手术时间短于前四组,与第4组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.01),与第6组相比差异无统计学意义(P=0.07)。结论:对于有熟练腹腔镜基本操作技术的医师而言,腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的学习曲线约为40例。     

经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝

目的：探讨经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术（ transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy ,TAPP）在治疗腹股沟复发疝中的效果。方法回顾性分析我院2010年6月～2013年12月TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝28例的临床资料。单侧疝25例,双侧疝3例（2例为术中发现）。斜疝13例,直疝15例。结果28例均获成功,无中转手术。手术时间（60＆#177;15） min,术中出血量（30＆#177;5）ml,术后住院时间（4＆#177;1）d。3例术后腹股沟区轻微疼痛不适,口服非甾体止疼药后缓解;4例血清肿,2例自行吸收,2例经多次穿刺抽液后治愈。随访时间1～24个月,平均17个月,其中20例＞12个月,均未见复发。结论 TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝避免了传统前入路的解剖复杂性,手术安全、有效。     

3D高清腹腔镜在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

目的 探讨3D高清腹腔镜下行经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)治疗成人原发性单侧腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法 选择2021年1月至2022年2月在我院行TAPP术的腹股沟疝患者,按随机数字表法随机分为两组：3D组45例,年龄22～81岁,左侧13例,右侧32例;斜疝37例,直疝3例,股疝3例,单侧直、斜复合疝2例;腹股沟疝分型：Ⅰ型9例,Ⅱ型30例,Ⅲ型6例;均采用3D腹腔镜系统行TAPP术。2D组49例,年龄23～88岁,左侧17例,右侧32例;斜疝42例,直疝3例,股疝2例,单侧直、斜复合疝2例;腹股沟疝分型：Ⅰ型12例,Ⅱ型32例,Ⅲ型5例;均采用2D腹腔镜系统行TAPP术。结果 两组患者性别、年龄、疝分型及类型等基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。围手术期相关指标比较,3D组手术时间、补片放置时间、腹膜缝合时间均少于2D组(P<0.05),而两组术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院总费用比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3D组出现血清肿2例,切口感染1例,肺部感染2例,2D组出现血清肿2例,切口感染及肺部感染各1例,两组并发症发生率比较无统计...     

Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

Background: Controversy exists regarding whether it is necessary to secure the mesh prosthesis during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, or port-site hernia. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing stapled with nonstapled laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repairs in a series of 502 consecutive patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair at two institutions between January 1995 and March 1997. Results: In all, 263 nonstapled and 273 stapled repairs were performed in 502 patients. Patients were evaluated at a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 1–32 months) by independent surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recurrence (0 to 263 nonstapled, 3 to 273 stapled; chi-square p= 0.09). The overall recurrence rate was 0.6%. There was no significant difference in operative time, port-site hernia, chronic pain or neuralgia between the two groups. Conclusion: It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair, allowing a reduction in the size of the ports. Received: 28 July 1998/Accepted: 25 November 1998     

腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿影响的前瞻性研究

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿的影响。方法采用前瞻性研究方法。选取2017年10月至2019年3月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的128例男性原发性腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组,患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘,设为试验组;患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端游离于腹腔,设为对照组。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后血清肿、切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发情况。随访时间截至2019年6月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。结果筛选出符合条件的男性患者128例;平均年龄为61岁,年龄范围为47~74岁。128例患者中,试验组60例,对照组68例。(1)手术情况:试验组和对照组患者手术时间分别为(102±34)min和(97±30)min,住院费用分别为(12813±2390)元和(12125±2205)元,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.907,1.685,P>0.05)。(2)随访情况:128例患者均获得随访。试验组和对照组术后发生血清肿分别为8例和8例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.072,P>0.05)。试验组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为20 mL(4~31 mL),对照组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为43 mL(23~98 mL),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.013,P<0.05)。试验组和对照组发生血清肿患者术后3个月均无切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发。结论TAPP术中疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘和将残端游离于腹腔均能有效修补腹股沟斜疝。疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘可减少术后血清肿抽液量。     

3D补片联合腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝对患者疼痛程度及术后复发情况的影响

目的探究3D补片联合腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）治疗腹股沟疝对患者疼痛程度及术后复发情况的影响。 方法选取自2016年9月至2017年12月于新疆医科大学第一附属医院普通外科进行手术治疗的70例腹股沟疝患者,根据术中所用补片不同,分为3D组（35例）及普通组（35例）,所有患者均行TAPP进行治疗。其中3D组患者所用补片为美国巴德-3DMAX疝气补片,普通组患者所用补片为美国柯惠（泰科）疝气修补片,为普通补片。观察并比较2组患者的手术指标、术后疼痛视觉模拟量表评分（VAS）、术后并发症及复发情况。 结果2组手术时间、术后住院天数、术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;3D组手术相关费用、术后下床活动时间均小于普通组（P<0.05）。术后即刻、术后12 h、术后30 d,2组患者的VAS评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;术后24 h、72 h、7 d、15 d,3D组患者的VAS评分均低于普通组,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后12、24、72 h,2组患者的VAS评分均较术后即刻升高,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）;术后7、15、30 d,2组患者的VAS评分均较术后即刻降低,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。2组患者术后并发症差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,且均未复发。 结论TAPP术是一种安全有效的手术方式,联合使用3D补片则可简化手术操作,降低患者术后疼痛,疗效可靠,值得临床推广应用。     

Incidentally detected splenogonadal fusion in a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair operation: A case report

IntroductionSplenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rare congenital malformation in which the spleen is connected to the gonad. Few SGF cases have been reported in the English scientific literature, and we are unaware of any previous case reports of SGF with inguinal hernia by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP). Here, we report a case of SGF that was incidentally detected during a TAPP procedure, with an uneventful postoperative course without complications.Presentation of caseA 76-year-old male presented with a 10-year history of left inguinal swelling. He was diagnosed with a left inguinal hernia, and we performed TAPP. Laparoscopy revealed the left inguinal hernia and two reddish-purple masses, one located close to the left inguinal ring. A cord of soft tissue extended cranially from the mass to the spleen, and passed through the left internal inguinal ring caudally. We cut the cord for mesh placement and to make an accurate diagnosis of the mass. Pathological and intraoperative findings indicated a diagnosis of continuous SGF.DiscussionWe observed two important clinical issues in this case. First, the potential for incidental diagnoses of SGF may be increasing. Second, to our knowledge, this is the first case report of a patient with SGF identified by TAPP. Such a therapeutic strategy for incidentally detected SGF has not been described; here we report a successful experience.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with SGF diagnosed by a TAPP procedure. The postoperative course was uneventful using our method.     

Local and general anesthesia in the laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair.

OBJECTIVE: The extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach (EXTRA) has been shown to be an effective and safe repair for primary (PIH), recurrent (RIH) and bilateral hernia (BIH). There is very little data examining the merits of laparoscopic repair for hernias under local anesthesia. In this' paper, we compare EXTRA performed under both general and local anesthesia. METHODS: This nonrandomized prospective study was performed selectively on a male population only. Patients with associated pulmonary disease and high risk for general surgery were selected. Patients with recurrence and previous abdominal operations were excluded to decrease confounding variables in the study. A Prolene mesh was used in all patients. RESULTS: Between May 1997 and September 1998, 92 male patients underwent the repair of 107 groin hernias using the EXTRA technique. The procedure was explained to them, and different anesthesia options were given. Fourteen of these repairs were performed under local anesthesia and 93 under general anesthesia. Of the 10 patients who underwent a repair under local anesthesia, there were 8 indirect, 5 direct and 1 pantaloon. The mean age was 53 years. In the group of general anesthesia, the types of hernias repaired were 45 indirect, 30 direct and 11 pantaloon. The mean age was 45 years. The mean follow-up was 15 months. Each patient was sent home the same day. Two peritoneal tears were recorded in the first group. The operative time was longer in the local group (47 +/- 11 vs 18 +/- 3). None of the patients required conversion to an open technique or change of anesthesia. No recurrences were found in either group. The average time of return to work and regular activity was 3.5 +/- 1 and 3 +/- 1 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no significant difference in recurrence and complication rates when the EXTRA is performed under local anesthesia as compared to general. Blunt dissection of the preperitoneal space does not trigger pain and does not require lidocaine injection. The most painful area is the peritoneal reflection over the cord structure. The laparoscopic repair under local anesthesia represents an advantage in the repair of the inguinal hernia, particularly in the population where general anesthesia is contraindicated.     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein术在成人腹股沟嵌顿疝的疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）与Lichtenstein术在成人腹股沟嵌顿疝治疗中的临床应用比较。 方法回顾分析2014年1月至2019年1月,上海中医药大学附属普陀医院急诊收治并完成无张力疝修补手术病例共82例成人腹股沟嵌顿疝患者临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为2组。观察组38例,行TAPP术;对照组44例,行Lichtenstein术。将2组手术时间,术后住院时间,术后疼痛评分,术后血清肿,术后其他并发症（复发、术后感染、术后肠坏死、出血）,术后总费用等进行统计学分析。 结果2组在术后血清肿及其他并发症上比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;研究组手术时间及住院费用明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;研究组术后住院时间及术后疼痛评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论TAPP术较Lichtenstein术手术时间长,术后总费用相对高,但其具有创伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快、复发率低等特点。     

腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术后应用芒硝外敷防治血清肿的临床研究

目的 探讨腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后应用芒硝外敷防治血清肿的的临床疗效。方法:选取安徽省亳州市中医院2021年8月—2022年3月普通外科收治的腹股沟疝拟行腹腔镜疝修补术患者120例,采用随机数字表法随机分试验组和对照组,每组各60例。两组均接受腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)。试验组术后即予以芒硝外敷,对照组予以沙袋压迫。比较两组患者术后血清肿发生情况以及其他手术指标。结果:两组患者在术后1 d VAS评分(4.15±1.15 vs 5.62±1.22),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。在术后1 d(10 vs 16)、3 d(7 vs 11)、7 d(2 vs 4)、30 d(1 vs 3)血清肿发生率、术后1 d(12 vs 20)、3 d(2 vs 5)、7 d(1 vs 3)阴囊肿胀发生率、住院时间(4.72±1.42 vs 5.22±1.38)、手术时间(108.20±46.41 vs 104.17±44.52)、术中出血量(5.83±0.94 vs 5.80±0.90)差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论:TAPP术后应用芒硝外敷可减轻术后疼痛,有助于降低术后血清肿的发生率,从而促进患者的快速康复, 具有简单、方便及价廉等优势,值得临床借鉴使用。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术在广东基层医院应用体会

【摘要】 目的 总结腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术在广东基层医院应用的经验和体会。方法〓回顾分析2011年1月至2013年6月间腹股沟疝患者共385例,根据已完成手术分分腹腔镜组(n=178)和开放组(n=207),腹腔镜组行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术,开放组行Lichtenstein修补术。对比两组患者手术时间、平均住院时间、住院费用、正常活动平均恢复时间以及术后并发症等指标。结果〓腹腔镜组平均住院费用高,但恢复正常活动时间短、住院时间短、术后疼痛少以及术后阴囊水肿发生少;腔镜组有5例患者中转开放手术,平均手术时间腔镜组略长于开放组。结论〓腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后患者较开放组恢复快、痛苦少,但需要全麻且费用较高,基层医院可选择性实施。     

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients

BACKGROUND: This report reviews our experience with 3530 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repairs in 3017 patients (513 bilateral) over the 7-year period from May 1992 to July 1999. We have continually audited our practice and modified the techniques in response. METHODS: Unless contraindicated, laparoscopic TAPP repair is considered the procedure of choice at our institution for all reducible inguinal hernias. We initially stapled an 11 x 6 cm polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space but now place a 15 x 10 cm mesh in the preperitoneal space with sutured peritoneal closure. RESULTS: There have been a total of 22 recurrences, of which 17 were identified in the first 325 repairs (5%) using the 11 x 6 cm mesh. Five recurrences occurred in the later 3205 repairs (0.16%) (median follow up of 45 months). There was one 30-day death unrelated to the procedure. There have been seven conversions (four due to irreducibility, two due to extensive adhesions, one due to bleeding). Bladder perforations have occurred in seven cases, of which six were recognized immediately and treated laparoscopically without sequelae. There have been seven cases of small bowel obstruction from herniation through the peritoneal closure. Sutured repair of the peritoneum has reduced the incidence of this complication. Four patients had mesh infections, of whom three were treated conservatively. The incidence of postoperative seroma and hematoma was 8%. Median operation time remains at 40 min with a mean hospitalization of 0.9 nights. Sixty percent of TAPP hernia repairs are now performed on the Day Surgical Unit with a 3% admission rate. Median return to normal activities is 7 days. Forty percent of patients require no postoperative analgesia. These figures remain the same whether the hernia is primary, recurrent, unilateral, or bilateral. Consultants performed most operations early in the series, but latterly surgical trainees have performed the majority of these procedures under supervision. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair is technically difficult, but in the hands of a well-trained surgeon, it is safe and effective with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The low recurrence rate compares favorably to other tension-free mesh hernia repairs.     

腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性股疝的临床效果研究

目的 探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前无张力疝修补术(TAPP)在治疗嵌顿性股疝方面的安全性及有效性。方法:回顾分析2017年4月—2021年12月天津中医药大学第一附属医院收治的30例嵌顿性股疝患者的临床资料,根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组17例,开放组13例,比较两组患者的手术情况、住院时间、并发症及随访结果等。结果:腹腔镜组手术时间[(71.35±10.48)min vs (86.90±12.54)min, P=0.010]、术中出血量[(17.06±3.40)mL vs (33.69±6.55)mL,P<0.001]、住院天数少于开放组[(5.90±1.30)d vs (8.23±9.93)d,P<0.001],术后疼痛评分低于开放组[(1.12±0.33) vs (2.09±0.70),P<0.001],术后排气时间短于开放组[(14.82±4.20)h vs (21.64±3.17)h,P<0.001],差异均有统计学意义;两组术后并发症无统计差异,术后随访1年,两组患者均未见复发。结论:TAPP手术治疗嵌顿性股疝是安全有效的,具有减少手术时间及出血,促进患者康复的优势。