Masked uncontrolled hypertension: Prevalence and predictors

Background

There are limited data on ‘masked uncontrolled hypertension’ (MUCH) in patients with treated and apparently well-controlled BP is unknown.

Repeated office blood pressure controls reduce the prevalence of white-coat hypertension and detect a group of white-coat normotensive patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether repeated office blood pressure controls may change the prevalence of white-coat hypertension among hypertensive patients. METHODS: We studied 221 newly diagnosed, never-treated hypertensive patients, all men, aged 31-60 years. On the first visit, they underwent sitting blood pressure measurements (two readings were taken by mercury sphygmomanometer and averaged) and non-invasive 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) every 15 min. Thereafter, each patient made four further visits over an 8-week period. On each visit, three sitting readings were taken and averaged. On the last visit, ABPM was performed again. Subjects who had hypertension in the clinic but whose daytime ambulatory blood pressure was less than 134/90 mmHg were considered to have white-coat hypertension. RESULTS: On the first visit, all patients were, by definition, clinically hypertensive and ABPM detected a prevalence of white-coat hypertension of 25.8%. On the following visits, the prevalence of clinical hypertensive patients progressively declined; on the last visit, the 82.3% of all patients resulted yet clinical hypertensive: on ambulatory blood pressure 71.9% were sustained hypertensives, whereas 10.4 had white-coat hypertension. Of the patients originally labelled as hypertensive, 17.7% proved to be clinically normotensive: 13.6% had also daytime ambulatory blood pressure in the normal range, whereas 4.1% showed elevated blood pressure during daytime ABPM (white-coat normotensives). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that repeated office blood pressure controls in newly diagnosed hypertensives reduce the number of office hypertensive patients, reduce the number of white-coat hypertensive patients and detect a small group of white-coat normotensive patients.     

Pulse pressure or dipping pattern: which one is a better cardiovascular risk marker in resistant hypertension?

OBJECTIVE: Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) reduction and ambulatory pulse pressure (PP) are well known prognostic markers obtained from ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The aim of this study is to investigate which one of these ABPM parameters is related to high cardiovascular risk profile in resistant hypertension, based on their associations with target organ damage (TOD). METHODS: Clinical-demographic, laboratory and ABPM variables were recorded in a cross-sectional study involving 907 resistant hypertensive patients. Nocturnal systolic BP reduction and 24-h PP were assessed both as continuous and dichotomized variables (PP at the upper tertile value: 63 mmHg). Statistical analyses included bivariate tests and multivariate logistic regression with each TOD as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Patients with the nondipping pattern and high 24-h PP shared some characteristics: they were older, had higher prevalence of cerebrovascular disease and nephropathy, higher office and 24-h BP levels, increased serum creatinine and microalbuminuria, and higher left ventricular mass index than their counterparts. Additionally, patients with high PP had a greater prevalence of diabetes and other TOD. In multivariate logistic regression, high PP was independently associated with all TODs even after adjustment for sex, age, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors, 24-h mean arterial pressure and antihypertensive treatment, whereas nondipping pattern was only associated with hypertensive nephropathy. Furthermore, PP was more strongly associated with the number of TOD than the nocturnal systolic blood pressure (SBP) fall. CONCLUSIONS: In a large group of resistant hypertensive patients, an increased 24-h PP shows a closer correlation with high cardiovascular risk profile than the nocturnal BP reduction.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional analysis of a 20,000-patient database in Spain

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters in a broad sample of high-risk hypertensive patients. METHODS: The Spanish Society of Hypertension is developing a nationwide project in which more than 900 physicians send ABPM registries and corresponding clinical records to a central database via www.cardiorisc.com. Between June 2004 and July 2005 a 20 000-patient database was obtained; 17 219 were valid for analysis. RESULTS: We identified 6534 patients with high cardiovascular risk according to the 2003 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines stratification score. Office blood pressure (BP) was 158.8/89.9 mmHg and 24-h BP was 135.8/77.0 mmHg. Patients with grade 3 BP in the office showed ambulatory systolic BP values less than 160 mmHg in more than 80%. A non-dipping pattern was observed in 3836 cases (58.7%), whereas this abnormality was present in 47.9% of patients with low-to-moderate risk [odds ratio (OR) 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-1.64]. The prevalence of non-dippers was higher as ambulatory BP increased ( approximately 70% when 24-h systolic BP > 155 mmHg) and was similar in both groups. At the lowest levels of BP (24-h systolic BP < 135 mmHg) a non-dipping pattern was more prevalent in high-risk cases (56.6 versus 45.7%; OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.40-1.64). CONCLUSION: There was a remarkable discrepancy between office and ambulatory BP in high-risk hypertensive patients. The prevalence of a non-dipper BP pattern was almost 60%. In the lowest levels of ambulatory BP, high-risk patients showed a higher prevalence of non-dipping BP than lower-risk cases. These observations support the recommendation of a wider use of ABPM in high-risk hypertensive patients.     

Clinical prediction of normotension in borderline hypertensive men--a 10 year study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a tool for long-term prediction of future blood pressure (BP) status in high normal and low stage 1 hypertensives. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 165 men from a population screening program with diastolic BP (DBP) 85-94 mmHg and a systolic BP (SBP) < 150 mmHg performed a 24-h ABPM. Ten years later, 120 participants (73%) returned for renewed measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure status at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, 53% of the participants were classified as hypertensive (HT) (BP > or = 140/90 or taking anti-hypertensive medication) and 47% were classified as normotensive (NT) (BP < 140/90 mmHg). There was no significant baseline differences in office SBP levels between those who were normotensive or hypertensive at follow-up (136/91 versus 138/92 mmHg), whereas both SBP and DBP night-time levels were significantly lower in the future normotensives as compared to the future hypertensives (107/69 versus 112/74 mmHg, P < 0.01). Using recommended normalcy night-time ABP levels of < 120/75 mmHg in addition to office BP (140/90) at baseline, over 85% of the subjects were correctly classified provided they met both clinic and ambulatory night-time criteria for HT and NT classification at baseline. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM in addition to office BP's in patients with borderline hypertension greatly increases the possibility of identifying those individuals who are at a very small risk of developing future hypertension. This could potentially lead to considerable savings in both patient anxiety, physician time and resource consumption.     

New algorithm for the diagnosis of hypertension

Most national and international guidelines for diagnosing hypertension include 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and self (home) BP monitoring (SBPM) as optional methods for identifying hypertensive patients. However, none of the current guidelines have yet included ABPM or SBPM as fundamental tools for diagnosing hypertension, preferring instead to rely on conventional office readings recorded by mercury sphygmomanometry. During the past 10 years, clinical outcome studies have consistently reported 24-h ABPM and SBPM to be significantly better predictors of cardiovascular events compared with the office BP, even when recorded under "research conditions." Based on the available evidence, the Canadian Hypertension Education Program has now developed an algorithm for diagnosing hypertension that offers three options: 1) conventional office BP, 2) SBPM, or 3) 24-h ABPM. Out-of-office BP measurements are recommended, whenever feasible, to minimize both measurement error associated with mercury sphygmomanometry and the white coat effect experienced by some patients.     

Uncontrolled hypertension in older patients: markers and associated factors to masked and white-coat effect

Background Hypertension is the main risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, affecting more than half the elderly population. It is essential to know if they have proper control of hypertension. The aim of this study was to identify the associated factors to masked uncontrolled hypertension and false uncontrolled hypertension in older patients. Methods Two-hundred seventy-three individuals (70.1 ± 6.7 years-old) had blood pressure (BP) measured at the office and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), with the definition of controlled group (C), individuals with high office BP and adequate ABPM, called white-coat effect group (WCE), uncontrolled (UC), and subjects with appropriate office BP and elevated ABPM denominated masked effect group (ME). Age, body mass index, diabetes, pulse pressure (PP) and BP dipping during sleep were evaluated (Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression models). Results Age was higher in UC than in C and ME (P < 0.01), and 24-h ABPM PP was lower in C (48 ± 7 mmHg) and WCE (51 ± 6 mmHg) than in UC (67 ± 12 mmHg) and ME (59 ± 8 mmHg) (P < 0.01). Sleep systolic BP dipping was lower in ME than in C (P = 0.03). Female gender was associated with a greater chance of being of ME group, which showed a higher PP and lower BP dipping during sleep. Conclusions In older individuals, office BP measurements did not allow the detection of associated factors that would permit to differentiate WCE from UC group and C from ME group. ABPM favored the identification of a higher PP and a lower BP dipping during sleep in the masked effect and uncontrolled groups.     

Aldosterone excess and resistance to 24-h blood pressure control

BACKGROUND: Aldosterone excess has been reported to be a common cause of resistant hypertension. To what degree this represents true treatment resistance is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to compare the 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) levels in resistant hypertensive patients with or without hyperaldosteronism. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-one patients with resistant hypertension were prospectively evaluated with an early-morning plasma renin activity (PRA), 24-h urinary aldosterone and sodium, and 24-h ABPM. Daytime, night-time, and 24-h blood pressure (BP) and nocturnal BP decline were determined. Hyperaldosteronism (H-Aldo) was defined as suppressed PRA (<1.0 ng/ml per h or <1.0 mug/l per h) and elevated 24-h urinary aldosterone excretion (>/= 12 mug/24-h or >/= 33.2 nmol/day) during ingestion of the patient's routine diet. RESULTS: In all patients, the mean office BP was 160.0 +/- 25.2/89.4 +/- 15.3 mmHg on an average of 4.2 medications. There was no difference in mean office BP between H-Aldo and normal aldosterone status (N-Aldo) patients. Daytime, night-time, and 24-h systolic and diastolic BP were significantly higher in H-Aldo compared to N-Aldo males. Daytime, night-time, and 24-h systolic BP were significantly higher in H-Aldo compared to N-Aldo females. Multivariate analysis indicated a significant interaction between age and aldosterone status such that the effects of aldosterone on ambulatory BP levels were more pronounced with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of similar office BP, ABPM levels were higher in resistant hypertensive patients with H-Aldo. These results suggest that high aldosterone levels impart increased cardiovascular risk not reflected by office BP measurements.     

Pulse pressure and mortality in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. A cohort study

HYPOTHESIS: Hypertension is a well-known cardiovascular risk factor in type 2 diabetic patients. It has been suggested that pulse pressure (PP) could be an independent cardiovascular risk factor in the general population, particularly in the elderly. An association between office PP and cardiovascular mortality has been previously reported in diabetic patients, while the relationship between ambulatory measurements of PP and all-cause mortality has not been assessed so far. AIM: To assess the relationship between ambulatory PP and all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with hypertension. METHODS: A cohort study was performed on a consecutive series of 435 diabetic outpatients. All patients underwent office blood pressure measurement (OBP) and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Mortality was assessed through queries at the Registry Offices of the city of residence for each patient. Mean follow-up was 3.8 +/- 1.2 years. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (13.3%) died during the follow-up. Mortality was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in patients in the highest quartile and lower in patients in the lowest quartile, when compared to the intermediate quartiles, both for office and ABPM-PP. In a multivariate analysis, after adjustment for numerous variables (including current hypoglycaemic, antihypertensive statin and aspirin treatment), mortality was increased by 3.1 and 5.3% for each incremental mmHg of office PP (p < 0.05) and ABPM-PP (p < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High PP, assessed through office measurement or ABPM, was associated with increased mortality in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. In our sample, PP assessed with ABPM is a better predictor of mortality than office PP.     

Ambulatory monitoring predicts development of drug-treated hypertension in subjects with high normal blood pressure

BACKGROUND: High normal blood pressure (HNBP), i.e. blood pressure (BP) > or = 130/85 mmHg and <140/90 mmHg, is an important predictor of progression to established hypertension. DESIGN: The purpose of this retrospective study was the evaluation of the predictive value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the development of drug-treated hypertension in subjects with HNBP and other risk factors. METHODS: We studied 127 subjects (69 M, 58 F, age 50 +/- 14 years): 59 subjects had normal BP (NBP: < 130/85 mmHg), 68 subjects had systolic and/or diastolic HNBP. All the subjects underwent ABPM. There were 21/68 (30.9%) subjects in the HNBP group vs. 1/59 (1.7%) in the NBP group with an elevated (>135/85 mmHg) daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) (p < 0.01). RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 103 +/- 28 months, 27 subjects (39.7%) in the HNBP group and 4 subjects (6.8%) in the NBP group developed drug-treated hypertension (p < 0.01). An elevated daytime ABP correctly predicted development of drug-treated hypertension in 17/21 subjects (81%) of the HNBP group and in the only subject of the NBP group. Development of drug-treated hypertension was associated with higher office and ambulatory BP (p < 0.01) and pulse pressures (p < 0.05), longer follow-up (p < 0.05) and higher prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia and smoking (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ABPM correctly predicts development of drug-treated hypertension in most subjects who were identified early as having a daytime mean ABP >135/85 mmHg. ABPM appears to be a useful clinical tool in the early diagnosis of hypertension in subjects with metabolic risk factors and smoking.     

Evaluation of prehypertension and masked hypertension rate among clinically normotensive patients

Background: The present cross-sectional study was aimed to identify pre-hypertension and masked hypertension rate in clinically normotensive adults in relation to socio-demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A total of 161 clinically normotensive adults with office blood pressure (OBP) <140/90?mmHg without medication were included in this single-center cross-sectional study. OBP, home BP (HBP) recordings and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) were used to identify rates of true normotensives, true pre-hypertensives and masked hypertensives. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected in each subject and evaluated with respect to true normotensive vs. pre-hypertensive patients with masked hypertension or true pre-hypertensive. Target organ damage (TOD) was evaluated in masked hypertensives based on laboratory investigation. Results: Masked hypertension was identified in 8.7% of clinically normotensives. Alcohol consumption was significantly more common in masked hypertension than in true pre-hypertension (28.6 vs. 0.0%, p?=?0.020) with risk ratio of 2.7 (95% CI 1.7–4.4). Patients with true pre-hypertension and masked hypertension had significantly higher values for body mass index, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic OBP and HBP (p?<?0.05 for each) compared to true normotensive subjects. ABPM revealed significantly higher values for day-time and night-time systolic and diastolic BP (p?=?0.002 for night-time diastolic BP, p?<?0.001 for others) in masked hypertension than true pre-hypertension. Conclusions: Given that the associations of pre-hypertension with TOD might be attributable to the high prevalence of insidious presentation of masked hypertension among pre-hypertensive individuals, ABPM seems helpful in early identification and management of masked hypertension in the pre-hypertensive population.     

How reliable is isolated clinical hypertension defined by a single 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?

BACKGROUND: Isolated clinical hypertension (ICH) is characterized by a persistently elevated clinic blood pressure in the presence of a normal day-time or 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). This definition is based on a single ABP monitoring (ABPM) and little attention has been focused on the reproducibility of this condition. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability of the criteria currently recommended by major hypertension guidelines to detect ICH based on a single 24-h ABPM session. METHODS: A total of 611 never-treated grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients (mean age 46 +/- 12 years) referred for the first time to our out-patient clinic, underwent repeated clinic blood pressure measurements, routine investigations, two 24-h periods of ABPM 1-4 weeks apart, cardiac and carotid ultrasound examinations. ABPM was always performed over a working day and the same daily activities were recommended during the two periods. ICH was diagnosed by the following criteria: (i) mean daytime values < 135/85 mmHg or (ii) mean 24-h blood pressure values < 125/80 mmHg during the first ABPM. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ICH was 7.1% according to criterion (i) and 5.4% according to criterion (ii). Twenty (46.6%) of the 43 patients with mean daytime blood pressure values < 135/85 mmHg during the first ABPM, exceeded this cut-off value during the second ABPM period. Twenty-two (66.6%) of the 33 patients with mean 24-h blood pressure values < 120/80 mmHg during the first ABPM did not confirm a normal blood pressure profile during the second ABPM recording. Cardiovascular involvement was significantly lower in subjects with persistent normal ABP compared to those with non-reproducible ICH pattern or sustained hypertensives. CONCLUSIONS: These findings clearly indicate that: (i) the classification of ICH on the basis of a single ABPM, using the cut-offs suggested by major hypertension guidelines, has a limited short-term reproducibility and (ii) repeated ABPM recordings should be recommended to correctly diagnose patients with ICH and improve cardiovascular risk stratification.     

Determinants of white-coat hypertension

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of white-coat hypertension (WCH) is considerable in patients referred with elevated office blood pressure. Failure to recognise this phenomenon can lead to the inappropriate use of antihypertensive medications. We undertook this study to determine the profile of patients with WCH. METHODS: Baseline clinic and daytime ambulatory blood pressures were available from 5716 patients referred over a 22-year period. Individuals were considered to have WCH if they had an elevated clinic blood pressure measurement greater than 140/90 mmHg and normal daytime mean ambulatory blood pressure. Mean age was 53.6 years and 53.2% were female. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of white-coat hypertension was 15.4%. A higher prevalence was seen amongst older adults, females, and non-smokers. CONCLUSION: Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these characteristics as independent predictors of WCH.     

动态血压监测二级筛选诊断高血压的价值

选择上海人民出版社医务室管辖的７７０名职工中的１０８例高血压（确诊１０２例，临界６例）为对象，观察停服降压药２周以上后的２４ｈ动态血压（ＡＢＰ）参数。在１０１例（检测率９３．５％）受检患者中，ＡＢＰ各项参数均正常者占１９．８％，随年龄增大而减少，男性１５．２％，女性３６．４％（Ｐ＜０．０５）；各项参数均升高者占２５．７％，随年龄增大而增加，男性３０．４％，女性９．１％（Ｐ＜０．１）。高血压患病率根据随测血压的ＷＨＯ标准为１４．０％，按照ＡＢＰ参数则为１１．２％。结果提示动态血压监测可以作为高血压诊断的二级筛选手段，有助于识别＂诊所高血压＂和高危患者。     

Exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise--a new portent of masked hypertension

Masked hypertension (MHT) is a popular entity with increased risk of developing sustained hypertension, heart attack, stroke, and death. Subjects have normal blood pressure (BP) at office but elevated values at night so it is difficult to diagnose. Exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise (EBPR) is also a predictor of future hypertension. To investigate the relationship between these two entities, we evaluated 61 normotensive subjects with EBPR. The subjects underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The prevalence of masked hypertension among subjects with EBPR was 41%. Body mass index (BMI), non-high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at peak exercise and recovery, nondipping DBP pattern, and elevated early morning average BPs were associated with masked hypertension. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the DBP measured at peak exercise was detected as an independent predictor of MHT in subjects with EBPR. Subjects with abnormally elevated BP during exercise are prone to MHT, necessitate medical assessment and close follow-up for hypertension.     

Effect of doxazosin GITS on 24-hour blood pressure profile in patients with stage 1 to stage 2 primary hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) on the 24 h blood pressure (BP) profile by ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) in patients with stage 1 to stage 2 primary hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen hypertensive patients-either untreated or after a two-week run-in/washout period-underwent office and ABPM monitoring before and six weeks after an open-label once-daily morning dose of 4 mg of doxazosin GITS, an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist. Fourteen patients responded; three did not. Data analyses refers to the responders: linear analysis demonstrated statistically significant reductions from baseline in daytime, night-time, and total 24 h means for systolic BP (SBP) (7-10 mmHg) and diastolic BP (DBP) (5-10 mmHg) after treatment, with no statistically significant change in heart rate (HR). Rhythm analysis demonstrated statistically significant reductions from baseline in mean mesor (8 mmHg), maximum (6 mmHg) and minimum (10 mmHg) values in SBP, and in mean mesor (5 mmHg), maximum (7 mmHg) and minimum (5 mmHg) values in DBP. Circadian rhythm parameters in BP and HR were not significantly altered by treatment. Treatment with doxazosin GITS was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A single morning dose of doxazosin GITS at 4 mg significantly reduced ambulatory SBP and DBP throughout a 24 h period while preserving a normal 24 h BP and HR rhythm profile in stage 1 to stage 2 hypertensives.     

Effects of hormone replacement therapy on office and ambulatory blood pressure in Japanese hypertensive postmenopausal women.

No study has demonstrated that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) affects blood pressure (BP) measured by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in Japanese postmenopausal women (PMW) with normotension or mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. In the present study, we examined the effects of HRT on office BP and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in Japanese hypertensive or normotensive PMW. Thirty-one hypertensive (HT-HRT group) and 17 normotensive PMW (NT-HRT group) received HRT (0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen combined with 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate) orally for 12 months, and 30 hypertensive (HT-Control group) and 19 normotensive PMW (NT-Control group) did not receive HRT. In all of the hypertensive PMW, BP was controlled by a variety of antihypertensive drugs before starting HRT. The hypertensive PMW were divided into two groups according to the results of ABP before HRT: nondippers (those without a diurnal change in BP) and dippers (those with a diurnal change in BP). In all patients, office BP measurements and 24-h ABPM were performed before and 12 months after the start of HRT. HRT did not change either the office or the 24-h ambulatory systolic, diastolic, or mean BP in any of the groups. Therefore, HRT did not significantly alter the proportion of nondippers. We conclude that with respect to BP, HRT might not be harmful in hypertensive PMW whose BP has been well-controlled prior to the initiation of HRT, as well as in normotensive PMW.     

Target organ damage in "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension"

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigated (i) the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in patients who had never been treated earlier with antihypertensive medication, and (ii) the association of these conditions with target organ damage. METHODS: A total of 1,535 consecutive patients underwent office blood pressure (BP) measurements, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography, and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries. Subjects who showed normotension or hypertension on the basis of both office and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurement were characterized as having confirmed normotension or confirmed hypertension, respectively. WCH was defined as office hypertension with ambulatory normotension, and MH as office normotension with ambulatory hypertension. RESULTS: WCH was found in 17.9% and MH in 14.5% of the subjects. The prevalence of WCH was significantly higher in subjects with obesity, while the prevalence of MH was significantly higher in normal-weight subjects. The confirmed hypertensive subjects as well as the masked hypertensive subjects had significantly higher left ventricular mass (LVM) (corrected for body surface area) and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) than the confirmed normotensive subjects did (108.9 +/- 30.6, 107.1 +/- 29.1 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2) and 0.68 +/- 0.16, 0.68 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm, respectively, P < 0.005). White coat hypertensive subjects did not have a significantly higher LVM index than confirmed normotensive subjects (101.5 +/- 25.9 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2)); they tended to have higher cIMT than the confirmed normotensive subjects, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.67 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm). CONCLUSIONS: WCH and MH are common conditions in patients who visit hypertension outpatient clinics. Confirmed hypertension and MH are accompanied by increased LVM index and cIMT, even after adjusting for other risk factors.     

White-coat hypertension: a clinical review

White-coat hypertension (WCHT), also called 'isolated office or clinic hypertension', is defined as the occurrence of blood pressure (BP) values higher than normal when measured in the medical environment, but within the normal range during daily life, usually defined as average daytime ambulatory BP (ABP) or home BP values (<135 mm Hg systolic and <85 mm Hg diastolic). The prevalence of WCHT varies from 15% to over 50% of all patients with mildly elevated office BP (OBP) values. In untreated hypertensive patients, the probability of WCHT especially increases with female gender and a mildly elevated OBP level. The value of other possible determinants such as (non) smoking status, duration of hypertension, left ventricular mass, number of OBP measurements, educational level, etc. is less consistently shown. Although, for various reasons, studies evaluating the long-term effects of WCHT are not always easy to interpret, most data indicate that persons with WCHT have a worse or equal cardiovascular prognosis than normotensives, but a better one than those with sustained hypertension. WCHT is sometimes considered a prehypertensive state, but data on the long-term evolution of subjects with WCHT are scarce. Patients with WCHT and a high cardiovascular risk or proven target organ damage should be pharmacologically treated. Subjects with uncomplicated WCHT should probably not receive medical therapy, but a close follow-up, including regular assessment of other risk factors and measurement of OBP (every 6 months) and ABP (every 1 or 2 years), is warranted.