Screening and preoperative imaging of candidates for conventional repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

This article summarizes considerations in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and preoperative imaging before conventional surgical repair. Because death of this relatively common disease can be prevented by an effective treatment, there is great interest in early detection and elective repair. The prevalence of AAA in older adults (65 to 80 years of age) varies from 4% to 7%. Factors associated with AAA include smoking, age, coronary artery disease, high serum cholesterol level, family history, and hypertension. A higher prevalence of AAA has been found among first-degree relatives of AAA patients, particularly in men, and smoking is an important factor in the development and progression of AAA. Screening for AAA may be appropriate in male patients older than 65 years with a smoking history, particularly current smokers, who have carotid occlusive disease, coronary artery disease, or lower extremity occlusive disease. Ultrasound is the screening method of choice and has the benefit of being inexpensive and noninvasive. Preoperative imaging serves mainly to establish the indication for operation. The vascular surgeon comfortable with discovering potentially confusing anatomic configurations or adverse extensions of pathology at the time of operation may not require any imaging beyond ultrasound. Specific indications for arteriography include suggestion of juxtarenal aneurysm by ultrasound or physical examination, clinical evidence of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease, uncontrolled hypertension or unexplained creatinine elevation, or prior arterial reconstruction. Spiral computed tomography (CT) scan with 3-dimensional reconstruction and gadolinium magnetic resonance (MR) angiography are increasingly useful alternatives to contrast arteriography.     

Arterial dimensions in the lower extremities of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms—no indications of a generalized dilating diathesis

PURPOSE: This study assessed whether there is a dilating diathesis in peripheral arteries of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: The anteroposterior diameters of the common femoral artery (CFA) and popliteal artery (PA) were measured in 183 consecutive patients with an AAA (158 men, 25 women; age range, 57-78 years) before elective surgery on the AAA and compared with that of healthy age-matched control subjects. The diameter registrations were performed on the right leg by using a noninvasive echo-tracking ultrasound scanning technique. RESULTS: Eight CFA aneurysms and four PA aneurysms were found in the male patients with AAAs. Of the patients with AAAs in the CFA and in the PA who were investigated, 46% and 49%, respectively, were affected by peripheral vascular occlusive disease (PVOD). The CFA diameters in the patients with AAAs were 97.8% of those in healthy control subjects (P = not significant [NS]). After exclusion of the CFA aneurysms, the diameters were 92.7% of those in healthy control subjects (P = .0003). If patients with PVOD were also excluded, the CFA diameters were 95.2% of those in healthy control subjects (P = .022). The PA diameters in the patients with AAAs were 97.8% of those in healthy control subjects (P = NS). If PA aneurysms were excluded, the diameters were 94.4% of those in healthy control subjects (P = .0003). If patients with PVOD were also excluded, the PA diameters were 96.1% of those in healthy control subjects (P = NS). CONCLUSION: After excluding the few patients with AAAs who had peripheral aneurysmal disease and the patients with PVOD, no dilating diathesis in CFAs and PAs was found. This supports the hypothesis that specific genetic, or other factors, not present in most AAAs are responsible for the occurrence of concomitant peripheral aneurysms. Furthermore, the generalized vascular dilating diathesis seen in some patients seems to be a specific entity that was not necessarily affiliated with AAA disease.     

Peripheral vascular occlusive disease in renal transplant recipients: risk factors and impact on kidney allograft survival

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the relationship between renal transplantation and the evolution of lower extremity peripheral vascular occlusive disease (PVOD). METHODS: A total of 664 adult renal allograft recipients from 1985-1995 were retrospectively reviewed for atherosclerotic risk factors and peripheral vascular occlusive disease (PVOD). PVOD events were defined as bypass, major amputation, claudication, or percutaneous angioplasty. Follow-up ranged from 2-12 years. RESULTS: The cumulative 5- and 10-year incidences of lower extremity PVOD after renal transplantation were 4.2 and 5.9%. Eight of 14 patients (57%) with pretransplant PVOD had additional PVOD events versus de novo appearance of PVOD in 21/650 patients (3.2%; P<0.0001). In a proportional hazards model, age, preoperative PVOD, diabetes, and postoperative smoking were independent risk factors for the development of PVOD after transplantation. Recipients with lower extremity PVOD had significantly lower 10-year patient and graft survival. Increased graft failure was due to an excess of deaths with a functioning graft. A total of 34 major interventions were performed. One- and two-year limb salvage rates were 64.2 and 53.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity PVOD after renal transplantation is associated with diminished patient survival, and affects kidney graft survival via disproportionate patient attrition. Age, preoperative PVOD, diabetes, and postoperative smoking are important risk factors. Transplantation does not appear to either accelerate or retard the progression of disease. An aggressive approach towards limb salvage in properly selected patients is justifiable.     

Prevalence of unsuspected abdominal aortic aneurysms in male veterans

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are potentially lethal arterial lesions that are best managed by elective surgical repair. However, asymptomatic AAAs may go undetected on routine physical examination or patients with such lesions may not consult a physician. To determine the prevalence of asymptomatic AAAs in a high-risk population, weretrospectively reviewed all abdominal CT scans on veterans >50 years of age that had been ordered for indications other than aneurysmal disease during a recent 10-month period. Of the 111 patients studied, 15 (13.5%) had suprarenal and/or infrarenal AAAs (one patient had both). Patients with AAAs were significantly older (p=0.0001) and were heavier tobacco users (p=0.003). For patients >60 years of age with peripheral vascular occlusive disease and a history of tobacco use, there was a 29.2% prevalence for AAA compared with 0% in those without any of these risk factors (p=0.04). There was a very definite trend suggesting that patients with peripheral vascular disease (p=0.06) were more likely to have an AAA. Because of the high prevalence of AAAs found in this population we then conducted aprospective study over a 24-month period during which patients >60 years of age with known peripheral vascular disease and a history of smoking who presented to the vascular laboratory for evaluation of problems not related to AAA were asked to undergo an abdominal CT scan. Fifty-six volunteers agreed to participate in the study. Seven patients had AAAs and one patient had an isolated iliac aneurysm, for a 14.3% overall prevalence of aneurysms. There was no difference in the incidence of risk factors in those patients with aneurysms and those without aneurysms. This represents one of the highest incidences for AAA thus far reported. If immediate repair is not performed, such patients must be followed closely for the development of symptoms or enlargement of their AAA.This study reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the view of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.     

Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Screening in Patients with Lower Extremity Atherosclerosis: A Prospective Study

p < 0.0001, sensitivity (52%), specificity (88%), positive predictive value (41%), negative predictive value (92%)]. As a result of the screening, eight elective carotid endarterectomies have been performed to date in six (7%) patients with one transient twelfth cranial nerve paresis as the only postoperative complication. We conclude that: (1) male patients presenting with symptomatic lower extremity atherosclerosis have a 20% prevalence of asymptomatic CAS > 50%, (2) there is no correlation between the degree of lower extremity ischemia and CAS > 50%, (3) carotid bruit is significantly associated with CAS > 50%, but has a low sensitivity, and (4) routine CAS screening should be considered for all male patients with symptomatic lower extremity atherosclerosis regardless of whether a bruit is present.     

Treatment of solitary iliac aneurysms: Clinical review of 28 cases

Purpose The clinical characteristics and long-term results of patients with solitary iliac aneurysms (SIAs) were investigated. Methods 28 consecutive patients who underwent repair of SIAs between 1985 and 2004 were reviewed retrospectively, and compared with those of 536 patients who underwent elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) during the same period. Results The incidence of SIAs among all aorto-iliac aneurysms was 5.0%. The 28 patients with SIAs were men with a mean age of 69.1 years. There were a collective total of 42 iliac aneurysms in the 28 patients, with 12 patients having multiple aneurysms. Thirty aneurysms involved the common iliac artery, and 12 involved the internal iliac artery. Twenty-two patients had symptoms, although none of the SIAs ruptured. Four patients had coexistent iliac occlusive disease and two patients had femoral occlusive disease. The 5-and 10-year survival rates of the patients with SIAs were 90.5% and 75.4%, whereas those of the patients with AAAs were 76.3% and 54%, respectively (P = 0.089). Conclusion Routine imaging is necessary not only to evaluate the SIAs, but also to detect multiple aneurysms or arterial occlusive disease. Close and long-term followup is mandatory for the early detection of the formation of new aneurysms.     

Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm among patients referred to the vascular laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Patients examined for peripheral arterial disease at the vascular laboratory, Uppsala University Hospital, are since 1993 screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The objective of this study was to study the prevalence of AAA found at this selective high-risk screening. METHODS: All files in the vascular laboratory were retrospectively reviewed. Of 9296 persons examined with arterial duplex between 1993 and October 2005, 5924 were screened for AAA. The primary target vessel was the carotid arteries in 3772 subjects, the renal arteries in 1529 subjects and the lower extremity arteries in 1457 subjects. An AAA was defined as an infrarenal aortic diameter >/=30mm. RESULTS: 179 subjects were found to have an AAA. In a logistic regression model male gender, age and duplex-verified arterial stenosis were independently associated with AAA (odds ratio 3.2, 2.0/20 years and 2.0, respectively, p<0.001). In men <60 years the AAA prevalence was 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.6%) when arterial stenosis was absent and 1.5% (0.0-3.2%) when present. In men >/=60 years the AAA prevalence was 4.0% (3.0-5.1%) when no arterial stenosis was found and 7.3% (5.7-8.9%) when found. The corresponding prevalences in women were 0%, 0%, 1.2% (0.5-1.8%), and 3.1% (1.9-4.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Men >/=60 years referred for arterial examination have a significant risk of having an AAA while only women >/=65 years with a duplex verified arterial stenosis have a sufficient risk of having an AAA. Studies to evaluate the benefit of selective high-risk screening are warranted.     

Screening and preoperative imaging of candidates for carotid endarterectomy

Randomized clinical trials have provided us with clinical guidelines regarding the indications for performing carotid endarterectomy in patients who have symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. Logically, any patient with a history of transient ischemic attacks, amaurosis fugax, or stroke should be evaluated for extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease. In asymptomatic patients, however, carotid artery surveillance may be helpful in identifying those at risk before neurological events. Patients at particularly high risk include those identified with (1) manifestations of systemic atherosclerotic disease (peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, renovascular disease); (2) presence of a carotid bruit; (3) advanced age (> 65 years); and (4) ABI less than 0.7. Duplex ultrasonography remains the best and most widely used noninvasive screening method, but its accuracy is highly technologist dependent. A high-quality duplex study may, in itself, be adequate to determine whether the severity of extracranial carotid occlusive disease warrants surgical intervention. Catheter-based arteriography may be used as an adjunct to validate duplex results, but its invasive nature and risk of complications has popularized alternative imaging methods. Of these, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) show excellent promise as noninvasive imaging techniques for the evaluation of extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease.     

下肢多平面动脉闭塞症的动脉重建术

探讨下肢多平面动脉闭塞症近远端动脉重建的治疗经验。方法:全组18例,男15,女3,平均67.4岁。通过测定踝/臂指数和经皮动脉穿刺插管造影,确定动脉病变范围。一期实施近、远端动脉重建16例,股-胫后动脉旁路转流2例。结果:全组术前平均踝/臂指数0.4,主、髂、股动脉病变33.3％,股、腘、小腿动脉病变55.6％,髂-小腿全下肢动脉病变11.1％。术后病死率5.6％,截肢率11.1％。术后1月,静息痛症状均得到改善,肢端溃疡愈合,踝/臂指数平均值0.94。平均随访22.5月,近端动脉重建畅通率100％,远端动脉重建畅通率80％,踝/臂指数平均0.85。结论:下肢多平面动脉闭塞症同时行近远端动脉重建安全、有效。手术成功关键在于动脉重建流人、流出道的畅通。     

A screening program to identify risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore the feasibility of a nurse-supervised aneurysm screening program to identify any independent risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) formation in high-risk patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 90 male patients in a university- affiliated hospital in southern Ontario. The patients were prospectively evaluated and all underwent abdominal ultrasonography, with the main outcome measure being detection of an AAA. RESULTS: AAAs were identified in 18 patients (20%) and had a mean diameter of 3.6 (range 2.8-6.0) cm. A separate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for the presence of an aneurysm. The presence of carotid artery disease proved to be the only statistically significant independent predictor of the presence of AAA (odds ratio 2.23, 95% confidence interval 1.76-2.56). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of a nurse-supervised AAA screening program, and on the basis of these results we recommend ultrasonographic screening for AAA in patients with a history of carotid artery disease.     

个体化血管重建术治疗下肢多平面动脉硬化闭塞症

目的 观察序贯立交搭桥或结合腔内技术治疗下肢多平面动脉硬化闭塞症的临床效果。方法 2004年4月～2005年7月，对11例14条下肢多平面动脉硬化闭塞症患者，采用序贯立交搭桥或动脉内膜剥脱术或腔内外结合手术治疗。其中男10例，女1例；年龄62～79岁，平均70．5岁。表现为间歇性跛行8例（FontaineⅡ期），静息痛3例（Fontaine Ⅲ期），足趾溃疡、坏疽1例（FontaineⅣ期）。彩色多普勒检查示14条下肢均为多平面动脉硬化闭塞，踝肱指数（ankle brachialindex，ABI）为0．36±0．11。下肢数字减影血管造影（digital subtraction angiography，DSA）显示双侧髂总动脉闭塞2em、髂外动脉闭塞、双侧股浅动脉闭塞3例，右侧髂总动脉狭窄、髂外动脉闭塞、双侧股浅动脉闭塞1例，单侧髂外动脉狭窄、股浅动脉闭塞7例。术后行DSA、彩色多普勒检查及ABI测定，观察血管通畅情况。结果 术后无死亡。患者均获随访3～26个月，平均14．5个月。间歇性跛行、静息痛等症状均消失，ABI术后为0．89±0．13，与术前比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。肢体获救率100％。术后3～280d行下肢DSA显示转流血管通畅率为92．86％（13／14）。结论 序贯立交搭桥或腔内外手术结合，是治疗严重下肢多平面动脉硬化闭塞症的一种可靠、安全、相对微创的治疗方法。     

Incidence of femoral and popliteal artery aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of femoral and popliteal aneurysms in men and women who have abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to assess potential etiologic differences in patients with and without these lower extremity aneurysms. METHODS: We studied 313 consecutive patients with AAAs encountered from 1995 to 1998 who underwent prospective ultrasound scanning to detect the presence or absence of femoral and popliteal aneurysms. Patients with and without these extremity aneurysms were compared for differences in potential etiologic risk factors with each other and with a statewide population of patients with AAAs. RESULTS: A total of 51 femoral and popliteal aneurysms were encountered, all occurring in male patients. Among the 251 men with AAAs, the incidence of femoral or popliteal aneurysms was 14%, compared with 0% among the 62 women with AAAs (P <.01). A family history of aneurysmal disease was present in only one (3%) of the 36 men with these extremity arterial aneurysms, a significant finding (P <.01) when compared with the family history that was positive for aneurysmal disease in 14 women (23%). Peripheral arterial occlusive disease affected 14 (39%) of the 36 men with peripheral arterial aneurysms versus 20 (9%) of the 215 men without these aneurysms (P <.01). Most other etiologic variables studied proved not to be different among the various groups of patients examined. CONCLUSION: The incidence of femoral and popliteal aneurysms in persons with AAAs appears higher than that noted previously. Femoral and popliteal aneurysmal disease preferentially affects men; however, the basis for this sex difference is unknown. Few common etiologic factors differed between men with and without these extremity aneurysms. Most femoral and popliteal artery aneurysms in this study were undetectable on physical examination, suggesting that ultrasound scanning is appropriate in the recognition of peripheral aneurysms among men with AAAs.     

The cost-effectiveness of early surgery versus watchful waiting in the management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the relative cost-effectiveness of two clinical strategies for managing 4 to 5 cm diameter abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs): early surgery (repair 4 cm AAA when diagnosed) versus watchful waiting (monitor AAA with ultrasound size measurements every 6 months and repair if the diameter reaches 5 cm).Methods: We used a Markov decision tree to compute the expected survival in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each strategy, based on literature-derived estimates for the probabilities of different outcomes in this model. We determined hospital costs for patients undergoing elective and emergency AAA repair at our center. With standard methods of cost accounting, we then calculated the additional cost per year of life saved by early surgery compared with watchful waiting (cost-effectiveness ratio, dollars/QALY).Results: Mean hospital costs for elective and emergency AAA repair were $24,020 and $43,208, respectively (1992 dollars). For our base-case analysis (60-year-old men with 4 cm diameter AAAs, with 5% elective operative mortality rate and 3.3% annual rupture rate), early surgery improved survival by 0.34 QALYs compared with watchful waiting, at an incremental cost of $17,404/QALY. Increased elective surgical mortality rate, decreased AAA rupture risk, and increased patient age all reduced the cost-effectiveness of early surgery. Future increases in elective operative risk, noncompliance with ultrasound follow-up and increased threshold size for elective AAA repair during watchful waiting all improved the cost-effectiveness of early surgery. Future increases in elective operative risk, noncompliance with ultrasound follow-up and increased threshold size for elective AAA repair during watchful waiting all improved the cost-effectiveness of early surgery.Conclusions: The cost effectiveness of early surgery for 4 cm diameter AAAs in carefully selected patients compares favorably with that of other commonly accepted preventive interventions such as hypertension screening and treatment. With an upper limit of $40,000/QALY as an "acceptable" cost-effectiveness ratio, early surgery appears to be justified for patients 70 years old or younger, if the AAA rupture risk is 3%/year or more and the elective operative mortality rate is 5% or less. Although not a substitute for clinical judgment, this cost-effectiveness analysis delineates the essential tradeoffs and uncertainties in treating patients with small AAAs. (J VASC SURG 1994;19:980–91.)     

Duplex ultrasound of the superficial femoral artery is a better screening tool than ankle-brachial index to identify at risk patients with lower extremity atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of vascular disease screening is early identification of atherosclerotic disease and the aim of an ankle-brachial index (ABI) is to identify lower extremity (LE) atherosclerosis as a marker for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, early evidence of atherosclerosis may be present in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) with a normal resting ABI. This study was performed to determine if SFA duplex ultrasound (DUS) could detect more patients with LE atherosclerosis than an ABI; be performed in the same or less time as the ABI measurement; and be associated with similar vascular disease markers as the ABI. METHODS: From January through November 2006, 585 patients were screened for peripheral arterial disease. SFA DUS was included in this Institutional Review Board approved program and demographic/ultrasound data were collected prospectively. SFA DUS findings were divided into six categories. Plaque w/o color change or worse and ABI <0.90 or >1.20 were considered to be abnormal. Data were evaluated using decision matrix and logistical regression analysis. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of SFA DUS using the ABI as the benchmark was 100% and 88%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of ABI was 17% and 100%, respectively, using DUS as the standard. DUS detected atherosclerotic disease in 143 SFAs (93 patients) in which the ipsilateral ABI was normal, and there were no false negative SFA DUS studies. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated the following variables to be significantly and independently associated with an abnormal SFA DUS as well as an abnormal ABI: history of claudication, history of myocardial infarction, and an abnormal carotid DUS. Additional variables (current or past smoker and age >55) were also independently associated with an abnormal SFA DUS but not with an abnormal ABI. Mean time to complete bilateral testing was essentially the same for both tests. CONCLUSIONS: SFA DUS is an accurate screening tool and can be utilized in screening protocols in place of the time-honored ABI without prolonging the examination. Traditional vascular disease markers that are found in patients with an abnormal ABI are also associated with an abnormal SFA DUS. SFA DUS identifies more patients with early LE atherosclerosis than does ABI without missing significant popliteal/tibial artery occlusive disease. Finally, an abnormal SFA DUS can be used as an indirect marker to identify more potentially at risk patients with CAD.     

Carotid intima-media thickness in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The contribution of atherosclerosis to the development of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) is still controversial. Ultrasound scans can detect intima-media thickening of the carotid arteries as an early sign of atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAAs) have thickened carotid IMT as patients with atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: With high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography, the intima-media thickness (IMT) in the carotid arteries (right and left common carotid artery) was measured in AAA patients and compared with that of age and sex-matched patients with atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). A third group of healthy age and sex- matched control subjects were included for comparison. The corresponding carotid artery lumen was also determined in all groups. Comparison of the three groups was made by ANOVA. RESULTS: Fifty-eight AAA patients and 69% were men (mean age of 72.3 years) were studied. Aged and sex-matched groups comprised of 111 PAD patients and 71 healthy. The mean carotid IMT was highest in PAD patients (1.036+/-0.18mm). The values of controls and AAA patients were similar and significantly lower than that of atherosclerotic patients (0.875+/-0.11mm and 0.812+/-0.53mm respectively, both p<0.005 vs. PAD). Narrowing of the corresponding lumen was found in PAD patients compared with that of AAA patients, but no difference can be seen between healthy subjects and AAA patients. The mean carotid IMT was greater in men (P<0.05) in all studied groups, but no similar gender specificity was found in the lumen diameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the carotid artery IMT of AAA patients is similar to healthy subjects, but not as thick as patients with atherosclerotic disease. As carotid (IMT) is a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis, the findings support the notion that the formation of AAA may not be fully atherosclerosis-dependent. Gender may be a confounding factor for carotid intima-media thickening.     

Minimal incision aortic surgery.

PURPOSE: In this study we evaluated the clinical and economic impact of minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS) for treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). METHOD: Fifty patients with either AAA (34) or AIOD (16), prospectively treated with the MIAS technique, were compared with 50 patients (40 AAA and 10 AIOD) treated in the same time period with long midline incision and extracavitary small bowel retraction. MIAS was also compared with a cohort of 32 patients with AAA treated by means of endoaortic stent-grafts. Outcomes and cost (based on metric mean length of stay) were compared for the open and endoaortic techniques. RESULTS: Patients who experienced no perioperative complications after the MIAS or endovascular repair technique had shorter hospital stays than patients with uncomplicated aortic repairs performed with a traditional long midline abdominal incision (3 days vs 3 days vs. 7.2 days). Hospital stay was also significantly shorter for the less invasive procedures when perioperative complications were included (4.8 days vs. 4.3 days vs 9.3 days). The MIAS and endovascular aortic repair groups had a shorter intensive care unit stay (< or = 1.0 day) and a quicker return to general dietary feeding (2.5 days) than patients treated with standard open repair (1.8 days, 4.7 days). The overall morbidity for the MIAS technique (14%) and endovascular technique (21%) was not significantly different from standard open repair (24%). The mortality rate for the different treatment groups was equivalent (MIAS, 2%; endovascular repair, 3%; standard repair, 2%). The MIAS was more cost-efficient than standard open repair ($12,585 vs $18,445) because of shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay and was more cost-efficient than endoaortic repair ($12,585 vs $32,040) because of reduced, direct intraoperative costs. CONCLUSIONS: MIAS is as safe as standard open or endovascular repair in the treatment of AAA and AIOD. MIAS is more cost-efficient than standard open or endoaortic repair.     

Routine coronary angiography prior to elective aortic reconstruction: results of selective myocardial revascularization in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Routine coronary angiography to determine the prevalence of severe coronary artery disease (CAD) has been recommended to all patients under consideration for elective peripheral vascular reconstruction at the Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic since April 1978. Those found to have severe, correctable CAD have been advised to undergo myocardial revascularization prior to performance of elective peripheral vascular operations. Forty-one of the 68 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and 26 of the 71 patients with aortoiliac occlusive arterial disease (AI) had clinical evidence of CAD; coronary angiography demonstrated severe, correctable CAD in 23 patients with AAA and in 14 patients with AI. Twenty-seven patients with AAA and 45 patients with AI had no clinical evidence of CAD; severe, correctable CAD was found in six patients with AAA and in six patients with AI. Ninety-six patients, including 26 who had staged cardiac procedures performed, have had elective aortic reconstruction, with one operative death.     

The cost-effectiveness of repairing ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Although advances in technology have reduced the operative risk of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, the surgical repair of ruptured AAAs is associated with a much poorer prognosis and a higher cost. Accordingly, it has been suggested that patients with predictably high rates of morbidity and mortality from ruptured AAA may not benefit from surgical intervention.Methods and Results: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with the use of a Markov decision-analytic model to compute long-term survival in quality-adjusted life years and lifetime costs for a hypothetical cohort of patients with ruptured AAAs managed with either a strategy of open surgical repair or no intervention. Probability estimates for the various outcomes were based on a review of the literature. Average costs of (1) the immediate hospitalization ($28,356) and (2) complications resulting from the procedure were based on the average use of resources as reported in the literature and from a hospital's cost accounting system. Our measure of outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. For our base-case analysis, the repair of ruptured AAAs was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10,754. (Society is usually willing to pay for interventions with cost-effectiveness ratios of less than $60,000; for example, the costeffectiveness ratios for coronary artery bypass grafting and dialysis are $9500 and $54,400, respectively.) In sensitivity analyses, the cost-effectiveness of repairing ruptured AAAs was influenced only by alterations in the operative mortality. If the operative mortality exceeded 88%, repair of ruptured AAAs was no longer cost-effective. As an independent variable, increasing age had no substantial impact on the cost-effectiveness, although it is reported to be associated with increased operative mortality. It was necessary that the patient's cost of the initial hospitalization for ruptured AAA exceed $195,000 before repairing ruptured AAAs was no longer cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that despite the high cost and poor outcomes, the surgical repair of ruptured AAAs is still cost-effective when compared with no intervention. The cost of repairing ruptured AAAs falls within society's acceptable limits and therefore should not be a consideration in the management of patients with AAAs.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: recommendations and controversies

Extensive level one evidence supports routine abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in men aged 65 to 75 years, because AAAs are highly prevalent in this population. Physical examination is an insensitive means of detection. Ruptured AAAs are costly with respect to quality adjusted life years (QALY) lost and medical expenses. Large scale, randomized trials have demonstrated that AAA screening reduces all AAA-related mortality in the screened population and is cost-effective in mid-term follow-up. AAA screening by ultrasound has many advantages over other accepted medical screening programs in its simplicity in structure and the availability of an inexpensive, portable, and reliable means of screening. Additionally, AAA screening almost entirely avoids the negative consequences associated with other screening programs, including the adverse psychological effects and medical costs associated with false-positive examination results. There are subgroups of at-risk women who might benefit from AAA screening, and this issue should be further studied.