Usefulness of noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis before and after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty

Noninvasive and catheterization studies were performed in 40 patients (mean age 76 +/- 12 years) before and after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty. Measurements included time to 1/2 carotid upstroke, left ventricular ejection time, aortic valve excursion, mean aortic valve gradient and aortic valve area assessed using the continuity equation: aortic valve area = A X V/V1, where A = left ventricular outflow tract area, V = maximal left ventricular outflow tract velocity assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and V1 = peak velocity in the aortic stenotic jet assessed using continuous-wave echocardiography. In addition, mitral regurgitation was assessed by pulsed Doppler mapping techniques. Mean aortic valve gradient, cardiac output and aortic valve area, calculated using the Gorlin formula, were determined at cardiac catheterization. There were significant correlations between Doppler and catheterization measurements of aortic valve area both before (r = 0.71, p less than 0.001) and after (r = 0.85, p less than 0.0001) valvuloplasty. The relations were demonstrated to be linear by F test and met criteria for identity. There were significant increases (all p less than 0.0005) after valvuloplasty in catheterization valve area (0.60 +/- 0.21 to 0.95 +/- 0.39 cm2), Doppler valve area (0.64 +/- 0.22 to 0.91 +/- 0.37 cm2), valve excursion (0.5 +/- 0.3 to 0.8 +/- 0.3 cm) and cardiac output (4.5 +/- 1.6 to 4.9 +/- 1.7 liter/min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Doppler evaluation of aortic valve area in children with aortic stenosis

To evaluate the usefulness of the Doppler-derived aortic valve area calculated from the continuity equation in assessing the hemodynamic severity of aortic valve stenosis in infants and children, two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examinations were performed on 42 patients (aged 1 day to 24 years) a median of 1 day before or after cardiac catheterization. The left ventricular outflow tract diameter was measured from the parasternal long-axis view at the base of the aortic cusps from inner edge to inner edge in early systole. The flow velocities proximal to the aortic valve were measured from the apical view with use of pulsed Doppler echocardiography; the jet velocities were recorded from the apical, right parasternal and suprasternal views by using continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. The velocity-time integral, mean velocity and peak velocity were measured by tracing the Doppler waveforms along their outermost margins. Seventeen patients (all less than or equal to 6 years old) had a very small left ventricular outflow tract diameter (less than or equal to 1.4 cm) and cross-sectional area (less than or equal to 1.5 cm2). The Doppler aortic valve area calculated with use of velocity-time integrals in the continuity equation (0.57 +/- 0.25 cm2/m2, mean value +/- SD) correlated well with the Doppler aortic valve area calculated by using mean (0.55 +/- 0.25 cm2/m2) and peak (0.54 +/- 0.24 cm2/m2) velocities, with correlations of r = 0.97 and 0.95, respectively. Thirty-four patients had sufficient catheterization data to calculate aortic valve area from the Gorlin formula.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prediction of severity of aortic stenosis: accuracy of multiple noninvasive parameters

PURPOSE: As newer non-medical techniques are developed to treat older patients with severe aortic stenosis, reliable noninvasive diagnosis of the condition will become increasingly important. For this reason, the accuracy of multiple noninvasive indexes for quantitation of the severity of aortic stenosis was evaluated, relative to catheterization-determined aortic valve area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the accuracy of multiple noninvasive parameters in assessing the presence and extent of aortic valve narrowing, noninvasive and catheterization correlations of the severity of aortic stenosis were obtained on 121 occasions in 81 patients (mean age, 76 +/- 11 years). Forty patients had studies performed before and after valvuloplasty. Noninvasive studies included the time to one-half carotid upstroke and carotid ejection time, corrected for heart rate, measured from a carotid pulse tracing; M-mode echocardiographic aortic valve excursion; mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve assessed by Doppler technique; the ratio of the peak to mean pressure gradient by Doppler; and Doppler aortic valve area assessed using the following continuity equation: aortic valve area = A X V/V1, where A = left ventricular outflow tract area, V = peak left ventricular outflow tract velocity, and V1 = peak velocity in the aortic stenotic jet. Mean aortic valve gradients and area (calculated using the Gorlin formula) were also assessed at cardiac catheterization. RESULTS: The correlations between the catheterization measurement of aortic valve area and the various noninvasive measurements were as follows: time to one-half carotid upstroke (r = -0.32, p less than 0.001); corrected left ventricular ejection time (r = -0.24, p less than 0.05); aortic valve excursion (r = 0.51, p less than 0.001); mean gradient by Doppler study (r = -0.44, p less than 0.001); mean gradient by catheterization analysis (r = -0.55, p less than 0.001); peak to mean gradient ratio measured by continuous wave Doppler (r = 0.38, p less than 0.001); and aortic valve area assessed using the Doppler continuity equation (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive determination of aortic valve area using the continuity equation is an accurate means of assessing the severity of aortic stenosis. Although multiple other noninvasive parameters also correlate with aortic valve area measured at catheterization, there is too much scatter of data points to permit accurate prediction of catheterization aortic valve area in any given patient.     

Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis

To determine if aortic stenosis severity could be accurately measured by two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), 62 adult subjects (mean age 66 +/- 12 years) with aortic stenosis had their aortic valve area (AVA) determined by direct planimetry using TEE, and with the continuity equation using combined transthoracic Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography (TTE). Eighteen subjects had AVA calculated by the Gorlin method during catheterization. An excellent correlation (r = 0.93, SEE = 0.17 cm2) was found between AVA determined by TEE (mean 1.24 +/- 0.49 cm2; range 0.40 to 2.26 cm2) and TTE (mean 1.23 +/- 0.46 cm2; range 0.40 to 2.23 cm2). The absolute (0.13 +/- 0.12 cm2) and percent (10.8 +/- 8.9%) differences between AVA determined by TEE versus TTE were small. Excellent correlations between AVA by TEE and TTE were also found in subjects with normal systolic function (r = 0.95, SEE = 0.14 cm2; n = 38) and impaired function (r = 0.91, SEE = 0.21 cm2; n = 24). AVA determined by catheterization correlated better with AVA measured by TEE (r = 0.91, SEE = 0.15 cm2) than AVA measured with TTE (r = 0.84, SEE = 0.19 cm2). These data demonstrate that AVA can be accurately measured by direct planimetry using TEE in subjects with aortic stenosis. TEE may become an important adjunct to transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity.     

Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of the results of balloon catheter valvuloplasty in aortic valve stenosis

This study was undertaken to assess the diagnostic value of Doppler echocardiographic methods for determination of the mean pressure gradient and valve orifice area in the evaluation of the results of balloon valvuloplasty (PTVP) in aortic stenosis by comparison with invasively-determined measurements. In 16 patients with aortic valve stenosis, eight men and eight women, mean age 64 +/- 10 years, Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed one day before and after PTVP. The mean pressure gradient was calculated with the aid of the modified Bernoulli equation and the aortic valve orifice area with the continuity equation. After PTVP, on comparison of Doppler echocardiographic and invasively-determined pressure gradients, there was no significant correlation (n = 16, y = 0.3x + 18.7, r = 0.36, SEE = 9.3 mm Hg) (Figure 2). Prior to PTVP the two methods correlated reasonably well with each other (n = 16, y = 0.6x + 7.7, r = 0.54, SEE = 17.8 mm Hg) (Figure 2). On comparison of the Doppler echocardiographic and invasively-determined aortic valve orifice area, both after and before PTVP, there were significant linear correlations (n = 8, y = 0.41x + 0.41, r = 0.73, SEE = 0.12 cm2 and n = 14, y = 0.71x + 0.17, r = 0.86, SEE = 0.10 cm2, respectively) (Figure 4). Correspondingly, there was close agreement between the change in absolute aortic valve orifice areas determined invasively (0.18 +/- 0.15 cm2) and noninvasively (0.15 +/- 0.10 cm2, n = 8).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Calculation of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography: a direct application of the continuity equation

The continuity equation suggests that a ratio of velocities at two different cardiac valves is inversely proportional to the ratio of cross-sectional areas of the valves. To determine whether a ratio of mitral/aortic valve orifice velocities is useful in determining aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis, 10 control subjects and 22 patients with predominant aortic stenosis were examined by Doppler echocardiography. The ratio of (mean diastolic mitral velocity)/(mean systolic aortic velocity), (Vm)/(Va), and the ratio of (mitral diastolic velocity-time integral)/(aortic systolic velocity-time integral), (VTm)/(VTa), were determined from Doppler spectral recordings. Aortic valve area determined at catheterization by the Gorlin equation was the standard of reference. High-quality Doppler recordings were obtained in 30 of 32 subjects (94%). Catheterization documented valve areas of 0.5 to 2.6 (mean 1.1) cm2. There was good correlation between Doppler-determined (Vm)/(Va) and Gorlin valve area (r = .90, SEE = 0.23 cm2); a better correlation was noted between (VTm)/(VTa) and Gorlin valve area (r = .93, SEE = 0.18 cm2). The data demonstrate the usefulness of Doppler alone in the determination of aortic valve area in adults with absent or mild aortic or mitral regurgitation and no mitral stenosis. Although the use of mean velocity and velocity-time integral ratios requires accurate measurement of mitral and aortic velocities, it does not require squaring of these velocities or measurement of the cross-sectional area of flow.     

Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic bioprosthetic valves

To assess the feasibility and accuracy of determining bioprosthetic aortic valve area from two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic measurements, three partially overlapping groups were selected from 55 patients with such bioprosthetic valves and adequate Doppler studies. These were Group 1, 37 patients with recent aortic valve replacement surgery and no clinical or echocardiographic evidence of valve dysfunction; Group 2, 12 patients with prosthetic valve stenosis documented by cardiac catheterization; and Group 3, 22 patients with both Doppler and catheterization studies in whom noninvasive and invasive determinations of aortic valve area could be directly compared. Left ventricular outflow tract diameter was measured from two-dimensional still frame images. Flow velocity proximal to the aortic valve, transvalvular velocity and acceleration time were determined from pulsed and continuous wave Doppler spectra. Aortic valve gradient was calculated with the modified Bernoulli equation and valve area by the continuity equation. In the 37 patients with a normally functioning valve, the calculated mean gradient ranged from 5 to 25 mm Hg (average 13.6 +/- 5.2) and valve area from 1.0 to 2.3 cm2 (mean 1.6 +/- 0.31). Linear regression analysis of prosthetic aortic valve area determined by Doppler imaging and cardiac catheterization demonstrated a high correlation (r = 0.93) between the two techniques. Comparison of the patients with and without prosthetic valve stenosis revealed statistically significant differences in mean gradient (42.8 +/- 12.3 versus 13.6 +/- 5.2 mm Hg; p = 0.0001), acceleration time (116 +/- 15 versus 80 +/- 13 ms; p = 0.0001) and valve area by the continuity equation (0.80 +/- 0.16 versus 1.6 +/- 0.31 cm2; p = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of aortic valve prostheses is based on the use of variables heretofore validated mostly for native valves. Accordingly, this study examined the validity and relative usefulness of the Doppler valve gradient and area measurements in 31 patients (mean age 69 +/- 10 years) 20 +/- 4 months after implantation of a given type of aortic bioprosthesis ranging in size from 19 to 29 mm. Valve area data obtained with both the standard and simplified continuity equations were compared with known in vitro prosthetic valve area measurements and an excellent correlation was obtained between the standard and simplified continuity equations (r = 0.98, SEE +/- 0.07 cm2, p less than 0.0005) and between in vivo and known in vitro prosthetic valve areas (r = 0.86, SEE +/- 0.16 cm2, p less than 0.0005). Peak gradient ranged from 10.8 to 75.0 mm Hg (mean 35 +/- 16) and mean gradient from 7.6 to 43.7 mm Hg (mean 20.5 +/- 9.5). The correlations between prosthetic valve gradient and in vivo area were r = -0.53, SEE +/- 14 mm Hg and r = -0.49, SEE +/- 8.63 mm Hg for peak and mean gradient, respectively. These relations were improved by indexing valve area by body surface area. The best correlations were obtained between indexed valve area and a quadratic function of the gradient (r = -0.72, SEE +/- 11.72 mm Hg and r = -0.70, SEE +/- 7.28 mm Hg for peak and mean gradient, respectively), reflecting a curvilinear relation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Contribution of the continuity equation for the assessment of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the continuity equation in the quantification of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis, the area being considered as the product of the area of the left ventricular outflow tract multiplied by the ratio of the velocity time integrals of the aortic or pulmonary flow to that mitral flow. The continuity equation was compared to two other echocardiographic methods, planimetry and Hatle's method, and to the results obtained at catheterization using the Gorlin formula in a population of 44 patients with mitral stenosis. All were in sinus rhythm; twelve had Grade I mitral regurgitation and 9 patients had Grade I aortic regurgitation. Excellent correlation were observed between the values obtained by the continuity equation and planimetry (r = 0.91; SEE = 0.19 cm2; p less than 0.001) and Hatle's method (r = 0.87; SEE = 0.20 cm2, p less than 0.001). The correlation with the catheter values were also excellent (r = 0.83; SD = 0.22 cm2, p less than 0.001), better than those observed with Hatle's method (r = 0.73; SEE = 0.27 cm2, p less than 0.001) and very similar to those obtained with planimetry (r = 0.87; SEE = 0.23 cm2, p less than 0.001). The sensibility and specificity of the continuity equation for the diagnosis of severe mitral stenosis (surface less than 1.5 cm2) were 90% and 100% respectively, when those of Hatle's method were 88% and 91% respectively. The continuity equation in the evaluation of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis seems to be reliable and accurate compared with catheter data, and superior to Hatle's method.     

Analysis of the early rise in aortic transvalvular gradient after aortic valvuloplasty

The relationship between dynamic changes in aortic valve gradient and left ventricular ejection performance in the early period after successful percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty has not been described in detail. Accordingly 20 adult patients with severe symptomatic calcific aortic stenosis underwent first-pass radionuclide angiography and Doppler echocardiography before, immediately after, and 2 to 4 days after the valvuloplasty procedure. A significant (p less than 0.001) reduction in peak-to-peak (72 +/- 24 mm Hg to 36 +/- 11 mmHg) and mean (60 +/- 20 mm Hg to 34 +/- 9 mm Hg) transaortic gradient and an increase in aortic valve area (0.5 +/- 0.2 cm2 to 0.8 +/- 0.2 cm2) were measured by high-fidelity micromanometer catheters immediately after aortic valvuloplasty. Results of Doppler echocardiography showed a significant (p less than 0.001) immediate decrease in peak instantaneous (81 +/- 22 mm Hg to 53 +/- 15 mm Hg) and mean (48 +/- 14 mm Hg to 31 +/- 9 mm Hg) aortic gradients. However, 2 to 4 days later a significant (p less than 0.001) return of peak (56 +/- 15 mm Hg to 65 +/- 20 mm Hg) and mean (31 +/- 9 mm Hg to 39 +/- 12 mm Hg) transvalvular gradient occurred. Aortic valve area as determined by the continuity equation also increased from 0.4 +/- 0.2 cm2 to 0.6 +/- 0.2 cm2 immediately after the procedure (p less than 0.001), then partially returned to baseline (0.5 +/- 0.2 cm2; p less than 0.005) at 2 to 4 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

In vitro measurement of stenotic human aortic valve orifice area in a pulsatile flow model. Validation of the continuity equation

Aortic valve orifice area estimation in patients with aortic stenosis may be obtained non-invasively using several Doppler echocardiographic methods. Their validity has been established by correlation with catheterization data using the Gorlin formula, with its inherent limitations, and small discrepancies between the methods are present. To evaluate these differences further, 15 patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean transvalvular gradient 70, range 40-130 mmHg) had aortic valve area estimations by Doppler echocardiography using two variations of the continuity equation. The intact valves removed at valve replacement surgery were then mounted in a pulsatile model and the anatomical area was measured (mean 0.67 +/- 0.17 cm-2) from video recordings during flow at 5.4 l min-1. Aortic valve area calculated using the integrals of the velocity-time curves measured at the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic jet (mean 0.65 +/- 0.17 cm2) correlated best with the anatomical area (r = 0.87, P less than 0.001). The area derived by using the ratio of maximum velocities from the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic jet (mean 0.69 +/- 0.18 cm2) also correlated well with the anatomical area (r = 0.79, P less than 0.001). The index between the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic jet maximum velocities was less than or equal to 0.25 in all. In patients with severe aortic stenosis the aortic valve area can be reliably estimated using Doppler echocardiography.     

Serial assessment of mitral regurgitation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty

Mitral regurgitation was serially assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 144 patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty for symptomatic aortic stenosis. Regurgitant scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 were assigned to pulsed Doppler patterns corresponding to no, mild, moderate and severe mitral regurgitation, respectively. Before balloon aortic valvuloplasty, mitral regurgitant score correlated significantly (p less than 0.005) but weakly with aortic valve area (r = -0.24), left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.34) and left ventricular systolic pressure (r = 0.23). There was no significant correlation between mitral regurgitation and either mean catheterization or mean Doppler aortic valve gradient. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty produced significant decreases in both catheterization and Doppler mean transvalvular aortic valve gradients (56 +/- 19 to 31 +/- 12 and 60 +/- 19 to 48 +/- 16 mm Hg, respectively; both p less than 0.0001) and a significant increase (p less than 0.0001) in aortic valve area assessed by catheterization (0.6 +/- 0.2 to 0.9 +/- 0.3 cm2). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not change, but cardiac output increased (p less than 0.001) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased (p less than 0.0001). Pulsed Doppler findings of mitral regurgitation were present in 102 of the 144 patients. Eighty-eight patients had a score compatible with mild or more severe degrees of mitral regurgitation, and 49 had a score indicative of moderate or severe valvular insufficiency. In the entire group of 144 patients, mitral regurgitant score decreased significantly from 1.1 +/- 1.0 to 1.0 +/- 1.0 (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of heart rate on transmitral flow velocity profile and Doppler measurements of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis.

To study the effect of heart rate changes on Doppler measurements of mitral valve area atrial pacing was performed in 14 patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm. Continuous wave Doppler and haemodynamic measurements were performed simultaneously at rest and during pacing-induced tachycardia. (1) Mitral valve area was determined using the conventional pressure half time method. (2) Additionally, mitral valve area was calculated with a combined Doppler and thermodilution technique according to the continuity equation. (3) Simultaneous invasive measurements were used for calculation of the mitral valve area according to the Gorlin formula. With increasing heart rate (69 +/- 13-97 +/- 15-114 +/- 13 beats min-1) mitral valve area either determined by the continuity equation (1.0 +/- 0.2-1.0 +/- 0.3-1.1 +/- 0.4 cm2) or the Gorlin formula (1.2 +/- 0.3-1.2 +/- 0.4-1.3 +/- 0.4 cm2) remained constant. Both methods correlated closely not only at rest (r = 0.88, SEE = 0.11 cm2, P less than 0.001), but also during atrial pacing (first level: r = 0.95, SEE = 0.10 cm2, P less than 0.001, second level: r = 0.95, SEE = 0.13 cm2, P less than 0.001). In contrast, mitral valve area calculated according to the pressure half time method increased significantly during atrial pacing (1.0 +/- 0.3-1.8 +/- 0.5-2.0 +/- 0.5 cm2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Reliability of the Doppler pressure half-time method for assessing effects of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty

The mitral valve areas determined by Doppler pressure half-time and by cardiac catheterization with use of the Gorlin formula were compared in 18 adult patients who underwent percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty. Doppler measurements and catheterization were performed simultaneously before, immediately after and 24 to 48 h after valvuloplasty. A high correlation between Doppler- and catheterization-derived mitral valve areas was found before mitral valvuloplasty (r = 0.81, Y = 0.88X + 0.1, SEE = 0.11 cm2) and 24 to 48 h after valvuloplasty (r = 0.84, Y = 0.70X + 0.67, SEE = 0.20 cm2). In contrast, the correlation immediately after valvuloplasty was only moderate (r = 0.72, Y = 0.43X + 1.1, SEE = 0.49 cm2). The Doppler-derived mitral valve area (2.41 +/- 0.61 cm2) immediately after valvuloplasty was significantly larger than the catheterization-derived area (2.08 +/- 0.39 cm2, p less than 0.05). In conclusion, the Doppler echocardiographic measurement performed with the pressure half-time method may lead to significant error immediately after mitral balloon valvuloplasty, but clinically accurate measurement can be obtained 24 to 48 h after valvuloplasty.     

Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods

Two Doppler methods, the pressure half-time method proposed by Hatle and the method based on the equation of continuity, were used to estimate stenotic mitral valve area noninvasively, and the accuracy of these methods was examined in patients with and without associated aortic regurgitation. Mitral valve area determined at catheterization by the Gorlin formula was used as a standard of reference. The study population consisted of 41 patients with mitral stenosis, and 20 of the 41 patients had associated aortic regurgitation. According to the equation of continuity, mitral valve area was determined as a product of aortic or pulmonic annular cross-sectional area and the ratio of time velocity integral of aortic or pulmonic flow to that of the mitral stenotic jet. Mitral valve area was determined by the pressure half-time method as 220/pressure half-time, the time from the peak transmitral velocity to one-half the square root of the peak velocity on the continuous-wave Doppler-determined transmitral flow velocity pattern. The pressure half-time method tended to overestimate catheterization measurements, and the correlation coefficient for this relation was .69 (SEE = 0.44 cm2). The correlation coefficient improved to .90 when the patients with associated aortic regurgitation were excluded. Mitral valve areas determined by the continuity equation method correlated well with catheterization measurements at a correlation coefficient of .91 (SEE = 0.24 cm2), irrespective of the presence of aortic regurgitation. The ratio of the time-velocity integral or aortic or pulmonic flow to the time-velocity integral of mitral stenotic jet also correlated well with mitral valve area determined by catheterization at a correlation coefficient of .84 (SEE = 0.10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pivotal role of aortic valve area calculation by the continuity equation for Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis in patients with combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation

Aortic regurgitation (AR) may result in overestimation of the aortic pressure gradient by continuous wave Doppler in patients with mixed aortic valve disease. However, few data are available regarding the effect of AR on noninvasive estimates of aortic valve area by the continuity equation. Therefore, 25 patients with angiographically documented severe AR and peak systolic aortic velocities of greater than 2.5 m/s were studied by continuous wave Doppler to determine the accuracy of pressure gradient and aortic valve area calculations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) in this patient population. Peak instantaneous pressure gradient showed a general correlation to but was overestimated by Doppler (r = 0.78, Doppler = 0.70 catheter + 19.9) and did not predict aortic valve area. Mean pressure gradient by Doppler correlated more closely with catheter mean gradient (r = 0.86, Doppler = 0.79 catheter + 6.1) but was a poor predictor of the severity of AS. In contrast, the continuity equation accurately predicted the aortic valve area by catheterization (r = 0.92, Doppler = 0.89 catheter -0.08). Thus, the continuity equation provides a reliable estimate of aortic valve area in patients with severe AR and should be used to evaluate the extent of AS in such patients when high systolic aortic velocities are present.     

Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients

Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography was performed prospectively in 100 patients with aortic stenosis who were undergoing clinically indicated cardiac catheterization. The purpose of this study procedure was to determine various Doppler variables predictive of the severity of aortic stenosis and to compare Doppler- and catheterization-derived aortic valve areas. Doppler-derived mean gradient correlated well with corresponding gradient by catheterization (r = 0.86). Peak Doppler aortic flow velocity greater than or equal to 4.5 m/s and Doppler-derived mean aortic gradient greater than or equal to 50 mm Hg were specific (93 and 94%, respectively) for severe aortic stenosis (defined as catheterization-derived aortic valve area less than or equal to 0.75 cm2) but were not sensitive (44 and 48%, respectively). Doppler-derived aortic valve area calculated by the continuity equation correlated well with catheterization-derived aortic valve area calculated by the Gorlin equation when either the time-velocity integral ratio (r = 0.83) or the peak flow velocity ratio (r = 0.80) between the left ventricular outflow tract and the aortic valve was used in the continuity equation. A velocity ratio of less than or equal to 0.25 alone was sensitive (92%) in detecting severe aortic stenosis. Therefore, use of various Doppler-derived values allows reliable noninvasive estimation of the severity of aortic stenosis.     

Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study.

BACKGROUND. Although Doppler echocardiography has been shown to be accurate in assessing stenotic orifice areas in native valves, its accuracy in evaluating the prosthetic valve orifice area remains undetermined. METHODS AND RESULTS. Doppler-estimated valve areas were studied for their agreement with catheter-derived Gorlin effective orifice areas and their flow dependence in five sizes (19/20-27 mm) of St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, and Hancock aortic valves using a pulsatile flow model. Doppler areas were calculated three ways: using the standard continuity equation; using its simplified modification (peak flow/peak velocity); and using the Gorlin equation with Doppler pressure gradients. The results were compared with Gorlin effective orifice areas derived from direct flow and catheter pressure measurements. Excellent correlation between Gorlin effective orifice areas and the three Doppler approaches was found in all three valve types (r = 0.93-0.99, SEE = 0.07-0.11 cm2). In Medtronic-Hall and Hancock valves, there was only slight underestimation by Doppler (mean difference, 0.003-0.25 cm2). In St. Jude valves, however, all three Doppler methods significantly underestimated effective orifice areas derived from direct flow and pressure measurements (mean difference, 0.40-0.57 cm2) with differences as great as 1.6 cm2. In general, the modified continuity equation calculated the largest Doppler areas. When orifice areas were calculated from the valve geometry using the area determined from the inner valve diameter reduced by the projected area of the opened leaflets, Gorlin effective orifice areas were much closer to the geometric orifice areas than Doppler areas (mean difference, 0.40 +/- 0.31 versus 1.04 +/- 0.20 cm2). In St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall valves, areas calculated by either technique did not show a consistent or clinically significant flow dependence. In Hancock valves, however, areas calculated by both the continuity equation and the Gorlin equation decreased significantly (p less than 0.001) with low flow rates. CONCLUSIONS. Doppler echocardiography using either the continuity equation or Gorlin formula allows in vitro calculation of Medtronic-Hall and Hancock effective valve orifice areas but underestimates valve areas in St. Jude valves. This phenomenon is due to localized high velocities in St. Jude valves, which do not reflect the mean velocity distribution across the orifice. Valve areas are flow independent in St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses but decrease significantly with low flow in Hancock valves, suggesting that bioprosthetic leaflets may not open fully at low flow rates.     

Noninvasive evaluation of aortic stenosis severity utilizing Doppler ultrasound and electrical bioimpedance

Aortic valve area was calculated noninvasively in 30 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing cardiac catheterization. Continuous wave Doppler ultrasound was employed to estimate the mean transvalvular pressure gradient. The mean left ventricular outflow tract flow velocity and cross-sectional area were determined from pulsed Doppler and two-dimensional ultrasound recordings. Electrical transthoracic bioimpedance cardiography performed simultaneously with the ultrasonic study and repeated at the time of catheterization measured heart rate, systolic ejection period and cardiac output. These noninvasive data permitted calculation of aortic valve area using the Gorlin equation (range 0.21 to 1.75 cm2) and the continuity equation (range 0.25 to 1.9 cm2). Subsequent cardiac catheterization showed valve area to range from 0.21 to 1.75 cm2. The mean Doppler pressure gradient estimate was highly predictive of the gradient measured at catheterization (r = +0.92, SEE = 10). Bioimpedance cardiac output measurements agreed with the average of Fick and indicator dye estimates (r = +0.90, SEE = 0.52). Valve area estimates utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound and electrical bioimpedance were superior (r = +0.91, SEE = 0.12) to estimates obtained utilizing the continuity equation (r = +0.76, SEE = 0.29) and were more reliable in the detection of patients with severe aortic stenosis (9 of 11 versus 6 of 11). These data show that 1) electrical bioimpedance methods accurately estimate cardiac output in the presence of aortic stenosis; 2) the hybridized bioimpedance-Doppler ultrasound method yields accurate estimates of aortic stenosis area; and 3) the speed, accuracy and cost-effectiveness of aortic stenosis evaluation may be improved by this hybridized approach.     

Factors affecting Doppler echocardiographic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the aortic valve area (AVA) using the continuity equation was performed before cardiac catheterization in 100 patients with suspected aortic stenosis. Doppler echocardiographic AVA correlated closely with AVA calculated by the Gorlin equation at catheterization (r = 0.96). However, Doppler echocardiography slightly but systematically underestimated the AVA (p less than 0.001) and did so most markedly in patients with mild stenosis (greater than 1.0 cm2). In multivariate analysis, the difference in AVA by the 2 techniques was positively associated with left ventricular (LV) stroke volume and inversely with the difference between mean catheterization and Doppler gradients, LV ejection fraction and LV outflow tract velocity. Furthermore, the AVA difference also was related to gender, being larger in women. Thus, overall Doppler echocardiography reliably assesses AVA, but the usefulness of the method is somewhat reduced by its underestimation of AVA in mild stenosis. This drawback, however, is usually overcome by taking patients' symptoms into account. Furthermore, lacking a "gold standard," this underestimation need not imply errors of the Doppler echocardiographic method alone, but also may reflect known inaccuracies of the catheterization technique.