Study Protocol for the Evaluation of the Potential for Durable Viral Suppression After Quadruple HAART With or Without HIV Vaccination: The QUEST Study

Abstract

Purpose: By protecting and stimulating HIV-specific CD4 cell responses, treatment of primary HIV infection (PHI) with potent quadruple HAART could lead to prolonged suppression of HIV replication after cessation of antiretroviral therapy. The QUEST trial investigates this hypothesis and aims to determine whether addition of a therapeutic vaccine to HAART increases the likelihood of prolonged viral suppression compared to HAART alone. Method: 148 patients with PHI were recruited. Participants were treated with open-label HAART for at least 76 weeks. Participants with sustained viremia <50 copies/mL were randomized to one of three 5-month, double-blinded study treatment groups: HAART alone, HAART + ALVAC-HIV (vCP1452), or HAART + ALVAC-HIV (vCP1452) + Remune^TM. After a further month of HAART alone, all treatment was stopped where plasma HIV-1 RNA remained at <50 copies/mL. Intensive virologic and immunologic monitoring during a 24-week observation period followed treatment interruption. Patients who met treatment reintroduction criteria were offered HAART rescue.     

Use of viral load measured after 4 weeks of highly active antiretroviral therapy to predict virologic outcome at 24 weeks for HIV-1-positive individuals

Early prediction of suboptimal viral response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is vital to prevent early development of drug resistance. We used logistic regression to predict the odds of achieving virologic suppression (<50 copies/mL) after 24 weeks of HAART in 656 antiretroviral-naive patients starting HAART at the J.W. Goethe University, Chelsea and Westminster, and Royal Free Hospitals according to their week 4 viral load. Therapy changes involving the switch of a single antiretroviral were assumed to have occurred for toxicity reasons and ignored. Because complete regimen changes or additions of new antiretrovirals could be due to virologic failure, patients were counted as virological failures at week 24. Three hundred sixty (84%) of 430 patients with viral loads of <1000 copies/mL, 106 (61%) of 175 with viral loads between 1001 and 10,000 copies/mL, 11 (37%) of 30 with viral loads between 10,001 and 100,000 copies/mL, and 5 (24%) of 21 with viral loads of >100,000 copies/mL at week 4 subsequently attained virologic suppression at 24 weeks. The odds of attaining virologic suppression at 24 weeks was 65% lower for every 1-log higher viral load at week 4 (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.45). The proportion of patients with an undetectable viral load at 24 weeks among those who have not attained a viral load of <1000 copies/mL by 4 weeks is quite low. We suggest that this group of patients should be particularly closely monitored.     

Why are baseline HIV RNA levels 100,000 copies/mL or greater associated with mortality after the initiation of antiretroviral therapy?

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of baseline plasma HIV RNA on virologic responses after the initiation of triple-drug antiretroviral therapy (highly active antiretroviral therapy [HAART]). This has made it difficult to interpret the recently reported association between baseline plasma HIV RNA and mortality. We evaluated whether baseline CD4 cell count and plasma HIV RNA predicted virologic suppression (<500 copies/mL) and rebound (> or =500 copies/mL) among adherent HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients were stratified by baseline CD4 cell count, plasma HIV RNA, and adherence level. Cox and logistic regression were used to evaluate the time to suppression and rebound and the odds of ever achieving HIV RNA suppression. RESULTS: A total of 1422 individuals initiated HAART between August 1, 1996 and July 31, 2000 and were followed to March 31, 2002. Adherent patients with HIV RNA levels > or =100,000 copies/mL and 50 to 99,999 copies/mL were slower to suppress HIV RNA than patients with baseline HIV RNA <50,000 copies/mL in Kaplan-Meier analyses. Although the odds of RNA suppression among adherent patients with baseline RNA levels <50,000 copies/mL and 50 to 99,999 copies/mL were similar (P = 0.197), patients with baseline HIV RNA > or =100,000 copies/mL were markedly less likely ever to achieve suppression during follow-up (adjusted odds ratio: 0.27 [95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.54]; P < 0.001). No differences in the rate of virologic rebound were observed between adherent patients in the various baseline HIV RNA strata, and CD4 cell count was not associated with suppression or rebound. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline HIV RNA > or =100,000 copies/mL was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of ever achieving HIV RNA suppression during follow-up. These findings likely explain the association between baseline HIV RNA levels and mortality and have important implications for the development of therapeutic guidelines.     

The role of hydroxyurea in enhancing the virologic control achieved through structured treatment interruption in primary HIV infection: final results from a randomized clinical trial (Pulse)

BACKGROUND: Structured treatment interruptions (STIs) have been postulated to improve virologic control in primary HIV infection (PHI) by stimulating HIV-specific T-lymphocyte immunity. The addition of hydroxyurea (HU) may reduce viral production from activated CD4 cells. METHODS: Patients with PHI received a standardized antiretroviral (ARV) regimen consisting of indinavir 800 mg twice daily (BID), ritonavir 100 mg BID, didanosine 400 mg (QD), and either stavudine 40 mg BID or lamivudine 150 mg BID, for up to 12 months and were randomized to HU 500 mg BID or not. If viral suppression (<50 copies/mL) was achieved, up to 3 STIs were undertaken. Two ARV cycles were allowed after each interruption if virologic rebound to more than 5000 RNA copies/mL occurred. Treatment success was defined as maintaining viral loads below 5000 copies/mL for 6 months after ARV interruption. RESULTS: Sixty-eight male homosexual patients were randomized: 35 to ARV + HU and 33 to ARV-alone. Median baseline HIV RNA was 5.73 log10 copies/mL, and median CD4 T-lymphocyte count was 517 cells/microL. Treatment success was not significantly different between those receiving and not receiving HU, with 9 (26%) and 9 (27%), respectively, maintaining viral load at less than 5000 copies/mL in each group (P = 0.88). Virologic control was achieved by 11 (19%) of 59 after 1 STI, 1 (2%) of 41 after 2 STIs, and 6 (17%) of 36 after the third STI. Serious adverse events were recorded for 9 (26%) of 35 of patients using HU and 3 (9%) of 33 in the ARV-only group (P = 0.28). CD4 cell increases were significantly blunted for the HU group compared to the ARV-alone group after the initial treatment phase (+101 cells vs. +196 cells, respectively, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxyurea was not found to be beneficial when used in association with STIs in patients during PHI.     

HIV-1 p24 may persist during long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy, increases little during short treatment breaks, and its rebound after treatment stop correlates with CD4(+) T cell loss

The dynamics of HIV-1 RNA during structured treatment interruptions (STIs) are well established, but little is known about viral proteins like p24. We studied 65 participants of an STI trial. Before the trial, continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) had suppressed their viral load to <50 copies/mL during 6 months. They then interrupted HAART during weeks 1 through 2, 11 through 12, 21 through 22, 31 through 32, and 41 through 52. The p24 was measured by boosted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of plasma pretreated by efficient virus disruption and heat denaturation. At time point 0, p24 was measurable in 22 patients (34%), who had maintained a viral load <50 copies/mL for 25.4 months (median, range: 6.2-38.9 months) under HAART. Viral rebounds during 2-week STIs led to a mean p24 increase of only 0.08 to 0.19 log10 (ie, 20%-60%). Pre-HAART viral load and p24 at time 0 independently predicted p24 rebounds during the 4 2-week STIs. The p24 at time 0 and HIV-1 RNA rebound during weeks 41 through 52 independently determined the concomitant p24 rebound. An increase of p24 but not viral load during the first 8 weeks of the long STI correlated significantly with concomitant CD4(+) T cell loss. Persisting p24 despite successful HAART may reflect virus replication in reservoirs not represented by plasma viral load and has implications for the concept of therapeutic vaccination.     

Real versus virtual phenotype to guide treatment in heavily pretreated patients: 48-week follow-up of the Genotipo-Fenotipo di Resistenza (GenPheRex) trial

We compared viroimmunologic response after real phenotype (r-PHT) versus virtual phenotype (v-PHT) in patients failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A total of 201 patients with >2 years of exposure, more than six experienced drugs, >1000 HIV RNA copies/mL, and on stable HAART for >6 months were randomized to the r-PHT or v-PHT arm. The primary end point was the proportion of HIV plasma viral load (pVL) <400 copies/mL. Secondary end points were absolute pVL change, proportion of pVL reduction >0.5 log(10) copies/mL, and absolute CD4 cell change. In the intention-to-treat-last observation carried forward analysis, study outcomes were not significantly different between arms over 48 weeks of follow-up: 20% and 24% pVL <400 copies/mL; 58% and 61% pVL reduction >0.5 log(10) copies/mL; -0.92 and -0.94(10) log copies/mL mean pVL decrease; and +41.6 and +94.4 cells/mm(3) mean absolute CD4 increase in the r-PHT and v-PHT arms, respectively. On-treatment analyses gave similar results. In the multivariate analysis of pVL <400 copies/mL, the following covariates were independent predictors at week 48: adherence (OR p= 0.25; p=.002), baseline CD4 (OR = 4.39; p=.007), intravenous drug use as risk factor for HIV acquisition (OR = 0.33; p=.024), and sensitivity score of the new regimens by biologic cut-offs (OR = 1.84; p=.029). Prescribed drugs for which patients were naive resulted in marginal prediction (OR = 1.93; p=.054). In conclusion, virologic and immunologic outcomes did not differ when r-PHT or v-PHT was used in this cohort of heavily pretreated patients. Several factors should be considered to take better advantage of resistance testing, including treatment history, clinical status, and patients' ability to adhere to treatment.     

Three-year durability of dual-nucleoside versus triple-nucleoside therapy in a Thai population with HIV infection

We compared the long-term immunologic and virologic efficacy of the dual- and triple-nucleoside therapy for HIV infection. This was a retrospective analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials in antiretroviral-naive patients. In the dual-nucleoside group, 15 started with didanosine (ddI) monotherapy and then added stavudine (d4T) after 24 weeks, 63 started with various doses of d4T and ddI, and 53 started with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). In the triple-nucleoside group, 53 started with ZDV, 3TC, and ddI. After 48 weeks, patients who were not failing were randomized to immediate (before treatment failure) versus delayed (at the time of virologic failure) switching from ddI and d4T to ZDV and 3TC or vice versa and from ZDV, 3TC, and ddI to d4T, 3TC, and abacavir (ABC). Failure was defined as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level>or=1 log10 above nadir or >or=10,000 copies/mL when nadir was <500 copies/mL. Patients failing therapy before week 48 received the new treatment as in the immediate switching group. Hydroxyurea was added to the last treatment regimen if patients failed after week 96. CD4 count and plasma HIV-1 RNA level (branched DNA assay with a cutoff point of 50 copies/mL) at week 144 were analyzed by intention to treat. Compared with the dual-nucleoside group, the triple-nucleoside group had a higher proportion of patients with <50 copies/mL at 144 weeks (60% vs. 18%; P<0.001), higher median CD4 count (388 cells/microL vs. 346 cells/microL; P=0.018), and longer duration of response, defined as the time from onset of viral suppression (<500 copies/mL) to the time of treatment failure (the first of 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements >500 copies/mL never followed by 2 consecutive visits showing suppressible viremia to <500 copies/mL) or discontinuation from the study (144 weeks vs. 104 weeks; P=0.002). Multivariate regression analyses showed that significant predictors for treatment success, defined as a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at week 144, were asymptomatic clinical status at enrollment, a baseline plasma viral load 相似文献   

HIV-infected patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy achieve high rates of virologic suppression despite adherence rates less than 95%

BACKGROUND: The observation that extremely high levels of medication adherence are required to achieve complete virologic suppression is based largely on studies of treatment-experienced patients receiving HIV protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy without ritonavir boosting. This study aims to define the level of adherence needed to achieve virologic suppression in patients receiving boosted PI-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with lopinavir/ritonavir. METHODS: HIV-infected adults receiving a regimen containing lopinavir/ritonavir were recruited into a prospective, observational study of the relation between adherence to lopinavir/ritonavir and virologic outcomes. Adherence was measured using the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS; Aardex, Union City, CA). HIV-1 viral load (VL) was measured at week 24. RESULTS: The final study population contained 64 subjects. Eighty percent had AIDS, 97% received lopinavir/ritonavir before enrollment, and most had more than 7 years of HAART experience. Mean adherence overall was 73%. Eighty percent and 59% achieved a VL <400 copies/mL and a VL <75 copies/mL, respectively. Mean adherence was 75% in those achieving a VL <75 copies/mL. High rates of virologic suppression were observed in all adherence quartiles, including the lowest quartile (range of adherence: 23.5%-53.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate levels of adherence can lead to virologic suppression in most patients taking lopinavir/ritonavir-based HAART.     

Lopinavir/ritonavir as single-drug therapy for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression: 48-week results of a randomized, controlled, open-label, proof-of-concept pilot clinical trial (OK Study)

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated maintenance with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy vs. continuing lopinavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleosides in HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, pilot clinical trial. METHODS: Adult patients were eligible if they had no history of virologic failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, were receiving 2 nucleosides + lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg b.i.d.) for >1 month and had maintained serum HIV RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months prior to enrollment. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue or stop the nucleosides. At baseline there were no significant differences between groups in median CD4 cells/muL (baseline or nadir), pre-HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) HIV log10 viremia, or time with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL prior to enrollment. After 48 weeks of follow-up, percentage of patients remaining at <50 HIV RNA copies/mL (intention to treat, M = F) was 81% for the monotherapy group (95% CI: 64% to 98%) vs. 95% for the triple-therapy group (95% CI: 86% to 100%); P = 0.34. Patients in whom monotherapy failed had significantly worse adherence than patients who remained virally suppressed on monotherapy. Monotherapy failures did not show primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and were successfully reinduced with prerandomization nucleosides. Mean change in CD4 cells/microL: +70 (monotherapy) and +8 (triple) (P = 0.27). Mean serum fasting lipids remained stable in both groups. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Most of the patients maintained with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy remain with undetectable viral load after 48 weeks. Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy were not associated with the development of primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and could be successfully reinduced adding back prior nucleosides.     

A Pilot,Prospective, Open-Label Simplification Study to Evaluate the Safety,Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Lopinavir-Ritonavir Monotherapy in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients: The MONOCO Study

Abstract

Background: A safe, effective, easy-to-dose antiretroviral therapy that minimizes hepatic complication risk is essential in optimizing HIV-HCV treatment. Nucleoside-sparing boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy may achieve this goal. Methods: A prospective, open-label pilot simplification study of once-daily lopina-vir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy in HIV-HCV coinfected patients was conducted in patients on HAART with undetectable HIV RNA for ≥6 months. The primary outcome was maintenance of HIV RNA <50 copies/mL through week 48. HIV RNA, immune measures, metabolic markers, and pharmacokinetics were assessed. Results: Twenty participants received once-daily LPV/r monotherapy. Mean baseline age was 46.9 years and CD4 467 cells/L. By per protocol analysis, 71.4% (95% CI, 45.4-88.3) remained on once-daily LPV/r monotherapy with virologic suppression at week 48. Virologic breakthrough (HIV RNA >50 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measures) occurred in 7 patients (mean standard error [SE] time to breakthrough, 38.3 [4.8] weeks). Resuppression occurred with improved adherence in 2 partici-pants and improved adherence plus addition of nucleosides in 2 others. LPV C ^min was <1 mg/L in 8 patients and was associated with virologic breakthrough in 2 cases but with no development of resistance. No clinically significant changes in CD4, lipids, or glucose were noted. Three participants developed transient ≥5-fold liver enzyme elevations. None of 9 severe adverse events were LPV/r- or liver-related. Six discontinued participation for withdrawal of consent (n=1), poor adherence (n=3), or drug intolerance (n=2). Conclusions: Once-daily LPV/r monotherapy in HIV-HCV coinfected individuals offers a safe and effective approach to the management of the HIV infection, with a predictable pharmacokinetic profile.     

Changes in outcome of persons initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy at a CD4 count less than 50 Cells/mm3

BACKGROUND: Although HIV treatment guidelines recommend highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) initiation before reaching a CD4 count of 200 cells/mm3, many people in resource-rich settings, and a substantial proportion in resource-limited settings, present at levels <50 cells/mm3. METHODS: Using UK Collaborative HIV Cohort data, we assessed virologic response to HAART for antiretroviral-naive persons initiating therapy at a CD4 count <50 cells/mm3. We also investigated changes in the probability of having a viral level <400 copies/mL at 48 weeks over calendar time adjusting for gender, age, exposure category, ethnicity, baseline CD4 count and viral load, and whether the regimen contained a protease inhibitor. RESULTS: At 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks, 80%, 83%, 85%, and 83% of participants, respectively, had a viral level <400 copies/mL. This proportion rose from 1997 to 1998, falling slightly in the most recent calendar period. By far the most important predictor of virologic suppression was calendar year of starting HAART (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49, 4.28, and 3.28 for 1999 to 2000, 2001 to 2002, and 2003 to 2005, respectively, compared with 1997 to 1998). Women were more likely to have a viral level <400 copies/mL at week 48 compared with men (OR = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 3.02), as were older individuals (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.96 for every 10 years older). There was marginal or no evidence that other factors were associated with outcome. The estimated corresponding probabilities of achieving a viral level <50 copies/mL at week 48 were 71%, 75%, and 79% for a woman aged 25, 35, and 45 years, respectively, initiating HAART in the most recent calendar period. The respective probabilities for a man at those ages were 68%, 73%, and 78%. CONCLUSIONS: These data, albeit under conditions of good infrastructure for care delivery, are a useful comparator for other populations starting therapy at similar levels of immunodeficiency and may be valuable for evaluating the success of antiretroviral therapy rollout programs.     

Interruption and discontinuation of highly active antiretroviral therapy in the multicenter AIDS cohort study

OBJECTIVE: Identify the determinants and consequences of interrupting and discontinuing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among a population-based cohort of HIV-infected men. METHODS: Longitudinal analyses were applied to 2916 person-visit pairs (589 men) of continuous HAART use, 243 person-visit pairs (154 men) during which HAART was interrupted, and 151 person-visit pairs (130 men) in which HAART was discontinued by the second visit. HIV RNA increase was defined as > or =1 log10 copies/mL across the visit pairs. RESULT:: Younger age, black race, geographic location, higher HIV RNA level, depression, shorter time on HAART, lower medication adherence, and not taking a lamivudine-containing regimen predicted interrupting HAART use. Younger age, higher HIV RNA level, depression, and taking an abacavir- or lopinavir-containing regimen predicted discontinuing HAART. Among men with < or =1000 HIV RNA copies/mL, approximately 5% of those who interrupted HAART for < or =7 days and those who continued HAART had an HIV RNA increase. Men with longer interruptions and HAART discontinuers had significantly higher rates of HIV RNA increases (35.7% and 70.5%, respectively). Discontinuation and long interruptions resulted in lower CD4 cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: Host characteristics play a role in short interruptions, whereas longer interruptions may be clinically indicated. These longer stoppages had further virologic and immunologic consequences, however.     

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Enfuvirtide to Raltegravir in Patients with Virological Suppression

Abstract

Objective: To assess the Efficacy and safety of switching from HAART containing enfuvirtide to raltegravir as a simplification strategy in patients with viral suppression and intolerance to enfuvirtide. Methods: Thirty-six patients with sustained plasma HIV RNA levels <50 copies/mL for at least 3 months with injection site reactions and/or injection fatigue while receiving an enfuvirtide-containing optimized background regimen switched from enfuvirtide to raltegravir (400 mg bid). Results: Patientshad received enfuvirtide for a median of 96 weeks and had sustained HIV RNA <50 copies/ mL for a median of 95 weeks. One patient discontinued raltegravir due to the appearance of cutaneous rash (grade 2) unresponsive to antihistamines after 19 days of starting raltegravir. The remaining 35 patients were followed for 24 weeks and 18 of them for 48 weeks. All patients maintained virological suppression <50 copies/mL at Weeks 24 and 48. No patient had blips in their viral load after switching to raltegravir. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to raltegravir. Conclusions: A switch from enfuvirtide to raltegravir in virologically suppressed patients who are highly treatment-experienced maintained both virologic and immunologic efficacy up to 48 weeks     

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz versus fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive patients: virologic, immunologic, and morphologic changes--a 96-week analysis

BACKGROUND: In antiretroviral-naive patients, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine (FTC), and efavirenz (EFV) demonstrated superior outcomes compared with fixed-dose zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC) and EFV through 48 weeks. Results through a 96-week extension phase are presented. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial, 517 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients received TDF, FTC, and EFV (TDF + FTC + EFV) or ZDV/3TC and EFV (ZDV/3TC + EFV). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an HIV RNA level <400 copies/mL in patients without baseline nonnucleoside resistance. RESULTS: Through week 96, significantly more patients receiving TDF + FTC + EFV achieved and maintained an HIV RNA level <400 copies/mL (75% receiving TDF + FTC + EFV vs. 62% receiving ZDV/3TC + EFV; P = 0.004). There was a trend toward greater virologic suppression to <50 copies/mL in the TDF + FTC + EFV group (67% vs. 61%; P = 0.16). The TDF + FTC + EFV group demonstrated a significantly greater increase in CD4 count (270 vs. 237 cells/mm; P = 0.036). No patient developed the K65R mutation. Limb fat at week 96 was significantly greater in the TDF + FTC + EFV group versus the ZDV/3TC + EFV group (7.7 vs. 5.5 kg; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Over 96 weeks, the combination of TDF, FTC, and EFV was superior to fixed-dose ZDV/3TC + EFV for achieving and maintaining an HIV RNA level <400 copies/mL and an increase in CD4 cells.     

Discontinuation of Enfuvirtide in Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Individuals

Abstract

Background: Enfuvirtide was shown to be highly effective in treatment- experienced patients. Data on discontinuation of enfuvirtide and switch to new antiretroviral drugs are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the impact of discontinuing and/or switching enfuvirtide on virologic and clinical parameters in clinical practice. Methods: All HIV-infected individuals participating in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study who were treated with enfuvirtide for at least 4 weeks in combination with an optimized background antiretroviral regimen were included in this study. Results: A total of 151 patients were analyzed. The median baseline CD4 cell count was 108 cells/μL (interquartile range [IQR] 50–206) and HIV RNA was 4.7 log₁₀ copies/mL (IQR 4.1–5.2). Virologic suppression, defined as a viral load below 50 copies/mL at 12 months, was achieved by 57.6% of patients. Overall, a median CD4 cell increase of 121 cells/μL (IQR 50–189) from baseline was noted. Up to 50% of patients discontinued enfuvirtide within the first year of treatment, mainly because of the patient’s choice. After discontinuation of enfuvirtide, high rates of virologic failure and clinical progression were observed, notably when CD4 cell count at stopping enfuvirtide was below 100 cells/μL and no switch to new potent antiretroviral drugs such as darunavir, maraviroc, or raltegravir was performed. Conclusions: Enfuvirtide provides high virologic and immunologic response in treatment-experienced patients in the setting of clinical practice. Enfuvirtide should not be discontinued but should be replaced by new potent antiretrovirals, particularly in case of severe immunosuppression.     

Immunologic, virologic, and clinical consequences of episodes of transient viremia during suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate immunologic, virologic, and clinical consequences of episodes of transient viremia in patients with sustained virologic suppression. METHODS: From the AIDS Therapy Evaluation Project, Netherlands cohort, 4447 previously therapy-naive patients were selected who were on continuous combination antiretroviral therapy and had initial success (2 consecutive HIV RNA measurements <50 copies/mL). During episodes of viral suppression (RNA <50 copies/mL), low-level viremia (RNA 50 to 1000 copies/mL), or high-level viremia (RNA >1000 copies/mL) after initial success, the occurrence of therapy changes, drug resistance, and clinical events was assessed. RESULTS: During 11,187 person-years of follow-up, 1281 (28.8%) patients had at least 1 RNA measurement >50 copies/mL. Among 8069 episodes, there were 5989 (74.2%) episodes of suppression, 1711 (21.2%) episodes of low-level viremia, and 369 (4.6%) episodes of high-level viremia. Most episodes of low-level viremia consisted of < or =2 RNA measurements (93.7%), were without clinical events or therapy changes (79.6%), and were without changes in CD4 cell counts. Therapy changes (52.3% of episodes) and resistance (23.3%) were frequently observed during high-level viremia. CONCLUSIONS: Episodes of low-level viremia are frequent and short lasting, and the low proportion of episodes with clinical events suggests that leaving therapy unchanged is a clinically acceptable strategy. In contrast, high-level viremia is associated with resistance and is often followed by therapy changes.