Predictors of severe morbidity and death after elective abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to identify risk factors associated with an unfavorable outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The clinical records of 158 patients who underwent elective open AAA repair with COPD determined from preadmission International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision codes during a 12-year period at the University of Michigan were reviewed. Patients with uncomplicated outcomes (group I) were compared with those with unfavorable postoperative outcomes (group II). The unfavorable outcomes were defined as myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, worsening respiratory insufficiency necessitating tracheostomy, or death within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression analyses of variables that were identified as being statistically significant in the univariate analysis were used to develop a predictive model of these events. RESULTS: Group I included 133 patients (77 men, 56 women) with a mean age of 70.1 years, and group II included 25 patients (13 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 71.4 years. Preoperative factors statistically related (P =.002) to an unfavorable outcome in group II patients included: suboptimal COPD management (fewer prescribed inhalers), lower hematocrit, preoperative renal insufficiency, and coronary artery disease. Importantly, abnormal preoperative spirometry and arterial blood gases were not predictive of a poor outcome. Univariate analysis also revealed increased hospital (25 versus 13 days; P =.0001) and intensive care unit (14 versus 4 days; P =.001) length of stays and a greater need for prolonged ventilation (8 versus 1 day; P =.039) for group II patients compared with group I patients. The 30-day mortality rate in the entire experience was 3.2% (5/158). No specific variables associated with mortality were identified. CONCLUSION: Fewer prescribed inhalers, lower hematocrit, renal insufficiency, and coronary artery disease are preoperative factors associated with unfavorable outcomes after open elective surgical repair of AAA in patients with COPD. Intensive management of these factors may reduce the hazards of AAA operations in these patients. COPD alone should not be considered a deterrent to the surgical treatment of AAAs.     

Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is reported to result in less initial patient morbidity and a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) when compared with conventional AAA repair. We sought to examine the durability of this result during the intermediate follow-up interval. METHODS: The records of all admissions for all patients who underwent AAA repair during a 26-month interval were reviewed. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-seven (337) patients underwent procedures to repair AAAs (163 open and 174 endovascular). Endovascular procedures were performed with a variety of devices (Talent, 108; Ancure, 36; AneuRx, 26; Zenith, 2; and Cordis, 2) and configurations (141 bifurcated and 33 aortomonoiliac). The mean follow-up period was 10.6 months (endovascular repair) and 12.3 months (open repair). LOS did not significantly vary by device (P =.24 to P =.92) or configuration (P =.24). The initial median LOS for procedures was significantly shorter (P =.009) for endovascular repairs (5 days) than for open procedures (8 days). However, the patients who underwent endovascular repair were more likely to be readmitted during the follow-up interval when compared with patients who underwent open procedure. The readmission-free survival rate after AAA repair at 12 months was 95% for patients for open AAA repair versus 71% for patients for endovascular repair (P <.001). If the total hospital days were compared, including the initial and all subsequent AAA-related admissions, there was no significant difference for mean LOS for patients who underwent endovascular versus open AAA procedures (11 days versus 13.6 days; P =.21). The patients for endovascular AAA repair most commonly needed readmission for treatment of endoleak (n = 31), wound infection (n = 12), and graft limb thrombosis (n = 9). Although women had similar LOS to men for endovascular repair (P =.44), they had longer initial LOS for open AAA repair (15 versus 10 days; P =.03). After endovascular repair, women were more likely than men to be readmitted by 12 months (51% versus 71% readmission-free survival rate; P =.03) and they had longer LOS on readmission (13.2 versus 5.2 days; P =.006). No gender differences were identified for patients after open AAA repair regarding readmission-free survival rate (P =.09) or LOS on readmission (P =.98). CONCLUSION: Although initial LOS was shorter for the patients who underwent endovascular as compared with conventional AAA repair, this advantage was lost during the follow-up interval because of frequent readmission for the treatment of procedure-related complications, chiefly endoleak. These readmissions frequently involved the performance of additional invasive procedures. Gender differences existed regarding LOS and the likelihood of complications after open and endovascular AAA repair.     

Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Outcome analysis is increasingly being used to develop health-care policy and direct patient referral. For example, the Leapfrog Group health-care quality initiative has proposed "evidence-based hospital" referral criteria for specific procedures including elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA-R). These criteria include an annual hospital AAA operative volume exceeding 50 cases and provision of intensive care unit (ICU) care by board-certified intensivists. Outcomes after AAA-R are reportedly influenced by presentation (intact vs. ruptured), operative approach (endovascular vs. open, transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal), surgeon subspecialty, case volume (hospital and surgeon), and provision of postoperative care by an intensivist. The purpose of this study was to compare our single-center results with those of high-volume centers to assess the validity of the concept that surrogate markers, such as case volume or intensivist involvement, can be used to estimate procedural outcome. A retrospective review was performed of AAA-Rs at one low-volume academic medical center from January 1994 to March 2005. Demographic data, aneurysm diameter and location, operative indications, and repair approach were documented. Postoperative complications, mortality rates, and hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) were noted and compared to established benchmarks. During the study period, 270 patients underwent AAA-R (annual mean = 27 hospital cases and 13.4 cases/attending vascular surgeon). ICU care was provided by a dedicated vascular surgery service without routine intensivist involvement. Open, elective, infrarenal AAA-R was performed in 161 patients (60%), with a 2.5% hospital mortality rate (30-day, 3.1%). Thirty-three (12%) patients underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with no mortality. Both ICU (3.7 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.03) and hospital (9.2 vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.002) LOS were significantly reduced after EVAR compared to open repair. Hospital LOS was significantly lower after open retroperitoneal repair compared to transperitoneal repair (6.1 vs. 10.3 days, p = 0.001). Thirty-five patients (13%) underwent ruptured AAA-R, with only 34.3% mortality (in-hospital and 30-day). Forty-one patients (15%) underwent repair of complex aortic aneurysms, with 14.1% mortality. There are increasing societal and economic pressures to direct patient referrals to "centers of excellence" for specific surgical procedures. Although our institution meets neither of the Leapfrog Group's proposed criteria, our mortality and LOS for both intact and ruptured infrarenal AAA-R are equivalent or superior to published benchmarks for high-volume hospitals. Individual institutional outcome results such as these suggest that patient referral and care should be based upon actual, carefully verified outcome data rather than utilization of surrogate markers such as case volume and subspecialist involvement in postoperative care.     

Epidural analgesia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing transperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysmorraphy--a multi-institutional analysis

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more likely to develop pulmonary morbidity following major abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of epidural analgesia in patients with COPD who underwent elective transperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: During a 7-year period, all patients diagnosed with COPD undergoing elective AAA repair (n=425) from three hospitals were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were an FEV(1)/FVC ratio <75% and/or a PaCO(2)>45 mmHg. Clinical outcomes were compared between those who received epidural analgesia (epidural group) and those who did not (control group). Primary endpoints measured were duration of intubation, ICU stay, hospital days, and pulmonary complications. RESULTS: Strict inclusion criteria were met by 131 patients, which included 86 patients in the epidural group and 45 patients in the control group. When comparing the epidural vs. control group, the mean AAA size was 6.3+/-0.9 cm vs. 6.0+/-1.5 cm (NS), FEV(1) was 57.2+/-24.7% vs. 49.0+/-10.3% (NS), and the mean FEV(1)/FVC ratio was 52.0+/-11.4% vs. 50.6+/-6.7% (NS), respectively. The epidural group had a significantly lower incidence of post-operative ventilator dependency and ICU stay (p<0.05), as well as a decreased trend in pulmonary complications when compared to the control group. The overall hospital stay remained similar between the two groups. The relative risk of developing a pulmonary complication in the absence of epidural analgesia was 2.3. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative epidural analgesia is beneficial in patients with COPD undergoing AAA repair by reducing both the post-operative ventilator duration and ICU stay. Epidural analgesia should be considered in all COPD patients undergoing elective transperitoneal AAA repair.     

Is routine use of the intensive care unit after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair necessary?

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative care after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has traditionally involved admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). With the advent of endovascular AAA repair, the management of open procedures has received increased scrutiny. We recently modified our AAA clinical pathway to include selective use of the ICU. METHODS: Consecutive elective infrarenal AAA repairs performed by members of the vascular surgery division at a university medical center from 1994 to 1999 were analyzed retrospectively with a computerized database, the Medical Archival Retrieval System. Group I consisted of 245 patients who were treated in the ICU for 1 or more days, and Group II included 69 patients admitted directly to the floor. Ruptured, symptomatic, suprarenal, endovascular, and reoperative repairs were excluded. Outcome variables were compared over the 6-year period. RESULTS: Floor admissions increased over the study period with 0%, 0%, 3.3%, 16.3%, 48.6%, and 43.6% of patients admitted directly to the surgery ward from 1994 to 1999. The average ICU length of stay declined from 4.6 to 1.2 days, whereas the hospital length of stay decreased from 12.5 to 6.8 days from 1994 to 1999. The change in ICU use had no effect on death (2.4% in Group I vs 0% in Group II). Major and minor morbidity was comparable. Hospital charges were significantly lower for patients in Group II. CONCLUSION: A policy of selective utilization of the ICU after elective infrarenal AAA repair is safe. It can reduce resource use without a negative impact on the quality of care.     

Results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the 1990s: A population-based analysis of 2335 cases

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are undergoing increased examination in parallel with the development of less invasive repair methods. Because most published studies of elective AAA repair report operations performed in tertiary referral institutions and thus may not reflect the outcome in the surgical community at large, the current population-based study was undertaken to document the results obtained across a broad spectrum of clinical practice in a defined geographic area and to examine the factors that influence the outcomes. METHODS: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was used to identify all the elective AAA repairs that were performed in all the nonfederal acute care hospitals in the state from 1990 to 1995. RESULTS: Elective AAA repair was performed on 2335 patients (mean age, 70.4 years) in 46 of the 52 (88%) nonfederal acute care hospitals in the state, including seven high-volume (>100 cases), nine moderate-volume (50 to 99 cases), and 30 low-volume (<50 cases) institutions. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5% and increased significantly with advancing age: less than 65 years, 2.2%; 65 to 69 years, 2.5%; 70 to 79 years, 3.5%; and more than 80 years, 7.3% (P =.002). Mortality rates were higher for women (4.5% vs 3.2%; P =.17), for blacks (6.7% vs 3.2%; P =.046), and for patients with renal failure (11.8% vs 3. 4%; P =.11) but not for patients with hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and pulmonary disease. The operative mortality rate was inversely correlated with hospital volume (4.3% in low-volume hospitals, 4.2% in moderate-volume hospitals, and 2.5% in high-volume hospitals; P =.08), although no differences were noted in the mean ages or comorbidity levels of patients who underwent operations in these three hospital populations. The operative mortality rate was inversely correlated with the experience of the individual surgeon: one case, 9.9%; two to nine cases, 4.9%; 10 to 49 cases, 2.8%; 50 to 99 cases, 2.9%; and more than 100 cases, 3.8% (P =.01). Multivariate analysis results identified patient age (P =. 002), low hospital volume (P =.039), and very low surgeon volume (P =.01) as independent predictors of operative mortality. The mean length of stay and mean hospital charges were 10.6 days and $17,589 and decreased with increasing surgeon volume: one case, 22.7 days/$32,800; two to nine cases, 10.6 days/$18,509; 10 to 49 cases, 10.0 days/$16,611; 50 to 99 cases, 10.9 days/$17,843; and more than 100 cases, 9.6 days/$16,682 (P <.0001/P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Elective AAA repair is a safe procedure in contemporary practice in Maryland. Operative risk is increased among the elderly and when operations are performed by surgeons with very low volumes or in low-volume hospitals. Hospital lengths of stay were shorter and charges were lower when elective AAA repair was performed by surgeons with higher volumes.     

Factors that predict prolonged length of stay after aortic surgery

OBJECTIVES: In this era of managed health care, third-party payers insist that surgeons minimize hospital stay even after major operations such as aortic surgery. We attempted to identify risk factors that predict prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) so that realistic expectations can be established for these patients who frequently are at high-risk. METHODS: In 1994 a clinical pathway for aortic surgery was implemented at our hospital. Between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2000, data including identifiable risk factors and LOS were reviewed for 240 patients who underwent elective infrarenal aortic surgery to treat aneurysmal (n = 179) or occlusive (n = 61) disease. Risk factors were analyzed to determine their effect on LOS. Data for patients who underwent endovascular, emergency, or concomitant cardiac surgery were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.4% (1 of 240 patients), and morbidity was 18% (44 of 240 patients). Mean LOS was 8.2 +/- 5.7 days for all patients, 6.9 +/- 2.9 days for those without complications, and 13.8 +/- 6.7 days for patients with complications (P <.0001). Factors that predicted prolonged LOS (Kaplan-Meier method) included age older than 75 years (P =.0004), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; P =.0351), intraoperative blood loss more than 500 mL (P =.0006), duration of surgery more than 5 hours (P <.0001), wound infection (P =.0311), and postoperative complications overall (P <.0001). Remaining factors associated with prolonged LOS (Cox regression analysis) included age older than 75 years (P =.0050), COPD (P =.0445), and complications overall (P =.0094). CONCLUSION: The only identifiable preoperative risk factors that correlated with increasing LOS after elective infrarenal aortic surgery (multivariate analysis) were increasing age and COPD. Third-party payers should allow longer hospitalization for patients older than 75 years and for patients with significant pulmonary disease.     

Improving aneurysm-related outcomes: nationwide benefits of endovascular repair

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has changed the practice of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. We examined a national Medicare database to establish the effect of EVAR introduction into the United States. METHODS: A 5% random sample of inpatient Medicare claims from 2000 to 2003 was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis and procedure codes. An EVAR procedure code was available after October 2000. Occurrences were multiplied by 20 to estimate yearly national volumes and then divided into the yearly Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) population of elderly Medicare recipients for rates per capita, reported as cases per 100,000 elderly Medicare recipients. Statistical analysis was performed by using chi2, Student's t test, nonparametric tests, and multiple regression analysis, with significance defined as P < or = .05. RESULTS: Elective AAA repairs averaged 87.7 per 100,000 Medicare patients between 2000 and 2003, with EVAR has steadily increasing to 41% of elective repairs in 2003. From 2000 to 2003, overall elective AAA mortality declined from 5.0% to 3.7% (P < .001), while open repair mortality remained unchanged. EVAR patients are significantly older than patients treated with open repair. From 2000 to 2003 patients >84 years receiving EVAR increased to 62.7% (P < .001). Overall hospital length of stay (LOS) decreased from 8.6 days in 2000 to 7.3 days in 2003, P < .001, but increased for open AAA patients. EVAR patients were more likely to be discharged home rather than to skilled facilities. Average elective repair hospital charges were not different between groups, but Medicare reimbursement was lower for EVAR, with a higher proportion cases classified as DRG 111 (major cardiovascular procedure without complications). EVAR was used in 10.6% of ruptured AAA repairs in 2003, with a significant reduction in mortality compared with open repairs for rupture (31.8% vs 50.8%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR is replacing open surgery without an increase in overall case volume. EVAR is responsible for overall decrease in operative mortality even in ruptured aneurysms while decreasing utilization variables. Reimbursement to hospitals is shrinking, however.     

Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of endovascular repair (ER) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has provided surgeons with a new technique that should ideally improve patient outcomes. To more accurately characterize the advantages of ER versus traditional/open AAA repair (TOR), we compared the preoperative medical risk factors (PMRFs) and perioperative outcomes (PO) of those patients undergoing elective treatment of infrarenal AAA with ER and TOR over a recent 18-month period at our center. METHODS: Through our institutional vascular surgery patient registry, all patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair of any type between December 1999 and June 2001 were identified. Only those patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were analyzed. Hospital records were examined for all patients, and PMRF and PO were assessed via Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Student t, chi(2), Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied where appropriate to determine differences among PMRF and PO according to method of aneurysm repair. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 199 aortic aneurysms were repaired at our institution. Ninety-nine elective infrarenal AAA repairs made up the study cohort (ER, n = 33; TOR, n = 66). When examined by method of aneurysm repair, no differences existed in demographics or AAA size. Patients undergoing ER had a significantly greater degree of preoperative pulmonary comorbidity than patients undergoing TOR (P <.001). However, no differences existed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification or cardiac (P =.52), cerebrovascular (P =.44), diabetic (P =.51), hypertensive (P =.90), hyperlipidemia (P =.91) or renal (P =.23) comorbidities between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were also not significantly different by method of repair. ER was associated with shorter operative time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay (P <.0001). However, subsequent operative procedures related to the AAA repair were performed more frequently after ER (TOR = 1.5% versus ER = 15.2%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescent and operating room times but no beneficial impact on overall morbidity and mortality rates when similar PMRFs exist, especially when used at medical centers where low morbidity and mortality rates are already established for TOR. Other centers performing ER should undertake such an analysis to assess its impact on their patients.     

Oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease does not prohibit aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Severe oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered by many to be a contraindication to open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. We reviewed our own experience with this patient population. METHODS: From July 1995 to March 1999, 14 consecutive patients limited by home oxygen-dependent COPD underwent elective open infrarenal AAA repair. Their medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean aortic aneurysm size was 6.3 cm. The mean PaO2 = 70 mm Hg, PaCO2 = 45 mm Hg, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 34% of predicted, and forced vital capacity (FVC) = 67% of predicted. All 14 patients were extubated within 24 hours, mean length of hospital stay was 5.9 days, and there were no perioperative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Severe home oxygen-dependent COPD is not a contraindication to safe elective open AAA repair.     

To what extent has endovascular aneurysm repair influenced abdominal aortic aneurysm management in the state of Illinois?

PURPOSE: This study was performed using population-based data to determine the changing trends in the techniques for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in the state of Illinois during the past 9 years and to examine the extent to which endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has influenced overall AAA management. METHODS: All records of patients who underwent AAA repair (1995 to 2003 inclusive) were retrieved from the Illinois Hospital Association COMPdata database. The outcome as determined by in-hospital mortality was analyzed according to intervention type (open vs EVAR) and indication (elective repair vs ruptured AAA). Data were stratified by age, gender, and hospital type (university vs community setting) and then analyzed using both univariate (chi 2 , t tests) and multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) techniques. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2003, 14,517 patients underwent AAA repair (85% for elective and 15% for ruptured AAA). The average age was 71.4 +/- 7.9 years, and 76% were men. For elective cases, open repair was performed in 86% and EVAR in 14%; and for ruptured cases, open repair in 97% and EVAR in 3%. Elective EVAR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared with open repair regardless of age. No differences were observed with age after either type of repair for a ruptured aneurysm. Men had a lower in-hospital mortality compared with women for open repair of both elective and ruptured aneurysms. For EVAR, the mortality of an elective repair was lower in men, but there was no difference after a ruptured AAA. In men, the difference in mortality between elective open repair and EVAR was significant; the type of institution did not influence outcome. Patients >80 years of age had a higher mortality after open repair for both elective and ruptured AAA and after EVAR of a ruptured AAA. The average length of stay was 9.9 days for open elective repair, 13.1 days after open repair of a ruptured AAA, and 3.6 days for EVAR. The independent predictors of higher in-hospital mortality were female gender, age >80 years, diagnosis (ruptured vs open), and procedure (open vs EVAR). The year of the procedure and type of hospital (university vs community) were not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR has had a significant impact on AAA management in Illinois over a relatively short time period. In this population-based review, EVAR was associated with a significantly decreased in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Octogenarians had higher mortality after both types of repair, with the exception of elective EVAR.     

Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and significance of aneurysm enlargement, with or without treatment, in relation to the primary end points of rupture, surgical conversion, aneurysm-related death, and survival following endovascular repair. METHOD: Aneurysm (AAA) size changes and clinical outcome of all patients treated from 1997 through 1998 during the Phase II AneuRx multicenter clinical trial of endovascular AAA repair were reviewed. Aneurysm dimensions and the presence or absence of endoleak were determined by an independent core laboratory, with enlargement or shrinkage defined as a diameter change of 5 mm or more compared with baseline. RESULTS: Among 383 patients (89% men, 11% women, age 73 +/- 9 years), with a mean device implant time of 36 +/- 11 months (median = 39 months), aneurysm diameter decreased from 5.7 +/- 1.0 at baseline to 5.2 +/- 1.0 at 3 years (P =.0001). A total of 46 patients (12%) experienced AAA enlargement, 199 patients (52%) had no change in AAA diameter, and 138 patients (36%) had a decrease in AAA diameter of 5 mm or more. Significant risk factors for enlargement included age (enlargement patients were 4 years older on average than patients with aneurysms that decreased in size; P =.002) and the presence of an endoleak (P <.001). Among patients with endoleak at any time, 17% had aneurysm enlargement, whereas only 2% of patients without endoleak had aneurysm enlargement (P <.001). Patients with enlargement were more likely to undergo secondary endovascular procedures and surgical conversions (P <.001). Twenty patients (43%) with enlargement underwent treatment, and 26 patients were untreated. There were two deaths following elective surgical conversion and one death in a patient with untreated enlargement and a type I endoleak. Three aneurysms ruptured: one with enlargement, one with no change, and one with a decrease in aneurysm size; all three aneurysms were larger than 6.5 cm. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that freedom from rupture at 3 years was 98% with enlargement, 99% with no change, and 99% with decrease in AAA size (log-rank test, not significant). Freedom from AAA death at 3 years was 93% in patients with enlargement, 99% in no increase, and 99% in decrease (P =.005). Survival at 3 years was 86% with increase, 82% with no change, and 93% with decrease (P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair was not associated with an increased risk of aneurysm rupture or decrease in patient survival during a 3-year observation period. Aneurysm size rather than enlargement may be a more meaningful predictor of rupture. Close follow-up and a high re-intervention rate (43%) may account for the low risk of rupture in patients with enlargement. The long-term significance of aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair remains to be determined.     

Standard open repair versus minilaparotomy approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms: what is the best approach in patients with ischemic heart disease?

AIM: The beneficial effects of minilaparatomy approach in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have been defined. In this respect, the authors compared treatment outcome and procedure-related mortality rates of minilaparotomy technique with those of open standard repair in patients with ischemic heart disease.\METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed data on 212 patients who underwent elective AAA repair via a minilaparotomy approach at the Hospital of Istanbul over an 8-year period from February 1995 to January 2003. The clinical study included 46 patients who have only ischemic heart disease as a sole risk factor. This group was matched in a case-control fashion to a group of 57 patients with similar characteristics who were operated via standard median laparotomy. All available clinical, pathologic and postoperative data were reviewed and analyzed for postoperative outcome.\RESULTS: Mean operative times in mini- and standard laparotomy groups were 190+/-26 min and 165+/-15 min, respectively (P=0.32). Aortic clamping times did not differ significantly between two groups (61+/-12 min vs 53+/-10 min, P=0.43). Blood requirement was lower in minilaparotomy group. Five patients (8.7%) in the standard median laparatomy group died, while one death (2%) occurred in the other group (P<0.01). In patients who have undergone traditional repair, 5 patients suffered from myocardial infarction and 4 patients required prolonged mechanical ventilation. No coronary ischemic event was noticed in minilaparotomy patients. The minilaparotomy group had significantly shorter lengths of hospital (6.2+/-1.1 vs 9.3+/-2.8 days, P=0.03) and intensive care unit (ICU) stays (7.8+/-2.3 vs 14.5+/-3.2 hours, P=0.01). Duration of adynamic ileus (1.9+/-0.6 vs 2.8+/-1.1 days, P=0.02), return to normal diet (3.2+/-1.0 vs 4.6+/-1.3 days, P=0.01) and day of ambulation (1.5+/-0.3 vs 3.2+/-0.7 days, P=0.001) were significantly lower in the minilaparotomy group. The standard median laparotomy group was twice as costly as the minilaparotomy group (3 200+/-600 vs 5 900+/-900 US dollars, P=0.001).\CONCLUSION: The minilaparotomy technique has advantages that include less postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, early resumption of intestinal functions, reduced cost, decreased length of stay in the ICU and hospital. There-fore, the authors believe that this approach is still a valid alternative approach in the treatment of patients with AAA having ischemic heart disease as a risk factor.     

Effect of improved endograft design on outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify factors that lead to improvements in the results of endovascular aneurysm repair, with particular focus on new endograft design. METHODS: We analyzed data for patients enrolled in the European Collaborators on Stent Graft Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EUROSTAR) registry, and compared those for endografts now withdrawn from the market with those for endografts currently in use. Patients in whom a variety of endograft types were used in small numbers were excluded. Postoperative and long-term outcomes were initially compared with univariate analyses, and subsequently multivariate tests were used to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 groups. The main outcome measures were freedom from a variety of secondary interventions, aneurysm rupture, and death. RESULTS: Some 1224 patients received "withdrawn" endografts, and 2768 patients received "current" endografts. The 2 groups were generally similar, but patients with current devices were more often men, significantly older, more frequently unfit for open surgery, and had larger aneurysms with wider necks. Of no surprise, current endografts were also more often used by experienced (>60 previous cases) surgical teams (44% vs 20%; P <.0001). Thirty-day clinical outcomes were comparable in the 2 groups, although patients with withdrawn devices were less likely to have type II endoleak (9.2% vs 5.5%; P <.0001), and those with current devices had a shorter mean hospital stay (5.4 vs 6.8 days; P <.0001). At 3 years more patients with current devices were free from secondary transfemoral intervention (88.4% vs 76%; P <.0001) and conversion to open repair (95.4% vs 93.4%; P =.007). Aneurysm-related mortality at 3 years, defined as death due to aneurysm rupture or within 30 days of a secondary intervention, was also less frequent with current endografts (2.7% vs 4.4%; P =.02). Aneurysm rupture at 3 years was infrequent (0.8% vs 1.8%; P =.07). At multivariate analysis the use of current devices was a protective factor against late conversion to open repair (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.86; P =.014) and aneurysm-related death (hazard ratio, 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.75; P =.0008). Larger aneurysm or neck diameter and shorter neck length were also associated with late conversion to open repair; larger aneurysm diameter, older age, and unfitness for open surgery were predictive of aneurysm-related death. CONCLUSION: Modern endograft design has improved the results of endovascular aneurysm repair.     

Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001

OBJECTIVE: Small patient numbers, mixed data from clinical trials, and longitudinal series representing institutional learning curves have characterized previous studies of early outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. We compared the perioperative outcomes of endovascular and open surgical AAA repair in an unselected sample of patients in a single calendar year using a national administrative database. METHODS: The 2001 National Inpatient Sample database was retrospectively reviewed. This database represents 20% of all-payer stratified sample of non-federal US hospitals. Patients older than 49 years were identified by primary diagnostic codes (International Classification of Disease, ninth revision [ICD-9], 441.4, intact, nonruptured AAA) and procedure codes (ICD-9 38.44 for open, 39.71 for endovascular repair). Patient demographic data (age, sex), comorbid conditions (ICD-9 coded), inpatient complications (ICD-9 coded), length of stay, final discharge disposition (home vs institution vs death), and hospital charges were examined with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In calendar year 2001, 7172 patients underwent either open (64%) or endovascular (36%) repair of intact, nonruptured AAAs. Despite comparable rates of preoperative comorbid conditions and a greater proportion of octogenarians (23% vs 16%%; P =.0001), morbidity (18% vs 29%; P =.0001) and mortality (1.3% vs 3.8%; P =.0001) were significantly lower for endovascular repair than for open repair. The median length of stay (2 vs 7 days; P =.0001) and the rate of discharge to an institutional facility versus home (6% vs 14%; P =.0001) were also much lower in the endovascular group than in the open repair group. At multivariate analysis, open AAA repair and age older than 80 years were strong independent predictors (P =.0001 for all) for death (open repair: odds ratio [OR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-4.9; age: OR, 14.2; 95% CI, 3.5-58.1), complications (open repair: OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.7-2.1; age: OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5), and not being discharged to home (open repair: OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.9-4.1; age: OR, 12.0; 95% CI, 7.0-20.4). Mean hospital charges were significantly greater (difference, $3337; P =.0009) for endovascular repair than for open repair. Extrapolated to the total number of endovascular AAA repairs performed during the single 2001 calendar year, this resulted in a staggering $50.3 million in additional hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of intact AAAs results in a significantly lower number of complications and deaths, shorter hospital stay, and improved likelihood of discharge to home, even in older patients, when compared with open surgical repair. These impressive gains in clinical outcome, however, are achieved at similarly impressive increases in health care costs.     

Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the relative importance of surgeon specialty, hospital volume, and surgeon volume on outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Data were reviewed for 3912 patients undergoing AAA repair in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample during 1997. In-hospital mortality was compared between high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals and between high-volume surgeons and low-volume surgeons. High-volume hospitals performed more than 35 AAA repairs per year, and high-volume surgeons performed more than 10 AAA repairs per year. Vascular, cardiac, and general surgery specialization was identified by analysis of other procedures performed by each surgeon. RESULTS: Overall, AAA repair mortality was 4.2%, and was lower at high-volume hospitals (3.0%) than at low-volume hospitals (5.5%) (P <.001). Lowest mortality was associated with operations performed by vascular surgeons (2.2%) compared with cardiac surgeons (4.0%) and general surgeons (5.5%) (P <.001). Mortality rates were also lower for high-volume hospitals (2.5%) compared with low-volume hospitals (5.6%) (P <.001). In a risk-adjusted analysis, high-volume hospital, vascular surgery specialty, and high-volume surgeon were all independently associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality. In this analysis, risk reduction was 30% for high-volume hospitals (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-51%; P <.05) and 40% for surgery by a high-volume surgeon (95% CI, 12%-60%; P =.01). AAA repair by general surgeons compared with vascular surgeons was associated with 76% greater risk for death (95% CI, 10%-190%; P =.02). No significant difference in mortality was found between cardiac and vascular surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: High surgeon volume and hospital volume of AAA repair were both associated with lower mortality compared with low-volume providers. Increased specialization in vascular surgery was associated with markedly decreased mortality independent of AAA repair volume. Health policy in support of selective referral for AAA repair should consider surgical specialization in addition to provider volume thresholds.     

Quality of life before and after endovascular and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate changes in quality of life and to compare conventional outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular and open retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Between October 2000 and May 2003, 129 patients underwent elective AAA repair, endovascular repair in 22 patients and open retroperitoneal repair in 107 patients. The Short-Form Health Survey, 12 items (SF-12) was administered preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year after discharge. Quality of life, hospital and intensive care unit stay, perioperative complications, discharge disposition, readmission, and hospital cost were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: For the total group, significant differences were observed for both Physical Component Summary scores (P<.001) and Mental Component Summary scores (P=.001) between time points. There were no significant differences for either Component Summary score between open and endovascular procedures for any time period. Number of weeks required to return to baseline functional status was similar after either open or endovascular repair (7.22 vs 5.47 weeks, respectively; P=.09). Mean hospital and intensive care unit stay was 4.4 and 1 days, respectively, for open repair versus 1.9 and 0 days, respectively, for endovascular repair (P<.0001). No significant difference between groups was observed in terms of perioperative complications, discharge disposition, or hospital readmission (P> or =.54). Mean total hospital cost for endovascular repair was 1.60 times that for open repair (mean difference, $11,662; P<.0001; 95% confidence interval, $17,799-$5525). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital stay is significantly shorter after endovascular AAA repair. However, hospital cost is almost twice that for open retroperitoneal repair. Perioperative complications, discharge disposition, and hospital readmission are not statistically different between the two groups. Effect on health-related quality of life is similar after either open retroperitoneal or endovascular AAA repair.     

Tracheostomy after major vascular surgery

OBJECTIVES: Major vascular surgery such as aortic aneurysm repair may be associated with prolonged in-patient hospitalization. Certain patients undergo a tracheostomy to aid in weaning from mechanical ventilation or for secretion management. The authors hypothesized that tracheostomy after aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal disease was associated with poor outcomes. DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Vascular surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one patients who underwent a tracheostomy after open thoracoabdominal or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair between 1993 and 2002. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1,940 patients who underwent aneurysm repair, 81 (4.2%) had a tracheostomy during their index hospitalization. Of those patients, 40.7% did not survive to hospital discharge. Postoperative sepsis was associated with an increased mortality (relative risk 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-4.90). Many developed postoperative renal failure and were more likely to die in the hospital (relative risk 1.53, 95% CI 1.00-2.33). The preoperative diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was not associated with increased mortality (relative risk 0.471, 95% CI 0.23-0.96). Thirty-two (39.5%) patients were transferred from the ICU to a chronic ventilator dependency unit (CVDU). CONCLUSIONS: Tracheostomy in patients after aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal disease is associated with a high incidence of in-hospital mortality. Patients who survive to ICU discharge are likely to be transferred to a CVDU for further respiratory management. The preoperative diagnosis of COPD is associated with improved survival, whereas postoperative sepsis is associated with an increased mortality. These observations should be considered when counseling patients and their families regarding tracheostomy after aortic surgery.     

Predictors of Early Discharge following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have lower perioperative morbidity and leave the hospital earlier than patients undergoing open repair. However, potential complications require continuous surveillance of endografts and there are few data regarding their long-term fate. If an open operation were well tolerated, this might be a preferable alternative. The purpose of this study was to identify patients with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay following open AAA repair and to analyze factors that might point to open repair as the preferred approach. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent AAA repair between 1995 and 2000 at our institution. All patients with ruptured aneurysms and those that required renal, celiac, or superior mesenteric reconstructions during the AAA repair were excluded. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbid conditions, intraoperative data, and postoperative complications were analyzed in detail. A total of 115 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was only one perioperative death (0.9%). The mean hospital stay was 8.1 days. A history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and longer operative time were independent factors associated with prolonged hospital stay. Forty-one patients (35.6%) left the hospital in 5 or less days. Compared to the group with hospital stay >5 days, these patients had a lower incidence of COPD (7.3% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.05) and smaller-size AAAs (5.6 vs. 6.4 cm, p < 0.0001), and were more often operated on via a retroperitoneal approach (61% vs. 40.5%, p < 0.05). Their time in the operating room was less (3.5 vs. 4.5 hr, p < 0.0001), and they had less estimated blood loss (750 vs. 1500 cc, p < 0.001) and fewer transfusions (0.95 vs. 2.45 units, p < 0.0001). Patients without COPD and smaller AAAs that can be repaired via a retroperitoneal approach have a lower incidence of perioperative complications and a shorter hospital stay following open AAA repair. Until long-term results for endografts are available, our data suggest that these patients are well served with an open repair.     

Prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate “fast-track” elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair

Background and aims Fast-track programs have been introduced in many surgical fields to minimize postoperative morbidity and mortality. Morbidity after elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair is as high as 30%; mortality ranges up to 10%. In terms of open infrarenal aneurysm repair, no randomized controlled trials exist to introduce and evaluate such patient care programs. Materials and methods This study involved prospective randomization of 82 patients in a “traditional” and a “fast-track” treatment arm. Main differences consisted in preoperative bowel washout (none vs. 3 l cleaning solution) and analgesia (patient controlled analgesia vs. patient controlled epidural analgesia). Study endpoints were morbidity and mortality, need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, and length of stay (LOS) on intensive care unit (ICU). Results The need for assisted postoperative ventilation was significantly higher in the traditional group (33.3% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.011). Median LOS on ICU was shorter in the fast-track group, 41 vs. 20 h. The rate of postoperative medical complications was significantly lower in the fast-track group, 16.2% vs. 35.7% (p = 0.045). Conclusion We introduced and evaluated an optimized patient care program for patients undergoing open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair which showed a significant advantage for “fast-track” patients in terms of postoperative morbidity. German Society of Surgery, Surgical Forum 2008, Best of Abstracts.