Anxiolytic-like effects induced by acute reversible inactivation of the bed nucleus of stria terminalis

There is conflicting evidence concerning the role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) in fear and anxiety-elicited behavior. Most of the studies investigating this role, however, employed irreversible lesions of this nucleus. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of an acute and reversible inactivation of the BNST in rats submitted to the Vogel conflict test (VCT) and contextual fear conditioning, two widely employed animal models that are responsive to prototypal anxiolytic drugs. Male Wistar rats were submitted to stereotaxic surgery to bilaterally implant cannulae into the BNST. Ten minutes before the test they received bilateral microinjections of cobalt chloride (CoCl(2)) (1 mM/100 nL), a nonselective synapse blocker. CoCl(2) produced anxiolytic-like effects in tests, increasing the number of punished licks in the VCT and decreasing freezing behavior and the increase in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate of animals re-exposed to the context where they had received electrical foot shocks 24 h before. The results indicate that the BNST is engaged in behavioral responses elicited by punished stimuli and aversively conditioned contexts, reinforcing its proposed role in anxiety.     

5-HT mechanisms of median raphe nucleus in the conditioned freezing caused by light/foot-shock association

We have shown that 5-HT mechanisms of the median raphe nucleus (MRN) are involved in contextual fear-conditioning processes as electrolytic or neurotoxic lesions with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or injections of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propilamino)-tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) into this structure inhibit freezing behavior in a contextual fear paradigm. In this work, we extend these studies by analyzing the behavioral responses in a classical fear-conditioning paradigm (light or tone/foot-shock association) in rats with either neurochemical lesion with NMDA or injected with 8-OH-DPAT into the MRN. The animals received NMDA or 8-OH-DPAT or saline microinjections into the MRN and were submitted to conditioning trials in an experimental chamber, where they received 10 foot-shocks (0.6 mA, 1 s, variable interval between 10 and 50 s) paired with tone or light (CS). On the next day, they were tested in a different experimental chamber, with or without CS presentation, where the duration of freezing and the number of rearing episodes were recorded. Light or tone alone caused a significant amount of freezing. NMDA lesions or 8-OH-DPAT injections into the MRN clearly inhibited freezing behavior in rats conditioned to light/foot-shock association, but not in the conditioning sessions with tones. Besides the proposed role in contextual fear conditioning, these results clearly show that MRN is involved in the fear conditioning with light as conditioned stimuli. Distinct neural substrates seem to subserve conditioning fear with acoustic stimuli.     

Effects of bed nucleus of the stria terminalis lesions on conditioned anxiety: aversive conditioning with long-duration conditional stimuli and reinstatement of extinguished fear

Four experiments investigated the effects of lesions of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) on conditioned fear and anxiety. Though BNST lesions did not disrupt fear conditioning with a short-duration conditional stimulus (CS; Experiments 1 and 3), the lesion attenuated conditioning with a longer duration CS (Experiments 1 and 2). Experiment 3 found that lesions attenuated reinstatement of extinguished fear, which relies on contextual conditioning. Experiment 4 confirmed that the lesion reduced unconditioned anxiety in an elevated zero maze. The authors suggest that long-duration CSs, whether explicit cues or contexts, evoke anxiety conditioned responses, which are dissociable from fear responses to shorter CSs. Results are consistent with behavioral and anatomical distinctions between fear and anxiety and with a behavior-systems view of defensive conditioning.     

Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.

The contribution of the amygdala and hippocampus to the acquisition of conditioned fear responses to a cue (a tone paired with footshock) and to context (background stimuli continuously present in the apparatus in which tone-shock pairings occurred) was examined in rats. In unoperated controls, responses to the cue conditioned faster and were more resistant to extinction than were responses to contextual stimuli. Lesions of the amygdala interfered with the conditioning of fear responses to both the cue and the context, whereas lesions of the hippocampus interfered with conditioning to the context but not to the cue. The amygdala is thus involved in the conditioning of fear responses to simple, modality-specific conditioned stimuli as well as to complex, polymodal stimuli, whereas the hippocampus is only involved in fear conditioning situations involving complex, polymodal events. These findings suggest an associative role for the amygdala and a sensory relay role for the hippocampus in fear conditioning.     

The lateral amygdala processes the value of conditioned and unconditioned aversive stimuli

The amygdala is critical for acquiring and expressing conditioned fear responses elicited by sensory stimuli that predict future punishment, but there is conflicting evidence about whether the amygdala is necessary for perceiving the aversive qualities of painful or noxious stimuli that inflict primary punishment. To investigate this question, rats were fear conditioned by pairing a sequence of auditory pips (the conditioned stimulus, or CS) with a brief train of shocks to one eyelid (the unconditioned stimulus, or US). Conditioned responding to the CS was assessed by measuring freezing responses during a test session conducted 24 h after training, and unconditioned responding to the US was assessed by measuring head movements evoked by the eyelid shocks during training. We found that pre-training electrolytic lesions of the amygdala's lateral (LA) nucleus blocked acquisition of conditioned freezing to the CS, and also significantly attenuated unconditioned head movements evoked by the US. Similarly, bilateral inactivation of the amygdala with the GABA-A agonist muscimol impaired acquisition of CS-evoked freezing, and also attenuated US-evoked responses during training. However, when amygdala synaptic plasticity was blocked by infusion of the NR2B receptor antagonist ifenprodil, acquisition of conditioned freezing was impaired but shock reactivity was unaffected. These findings indicate that neural activity within the amygdala is important for both predicting and perceiving the aversive qualities of noxious stimuli, and that synaptic plasticity within LA is the mechanism by which the CS becomes associated with the US during fear conditioning.     

Different lateral amygdala outputs mediate reactions and actions elicited by a fear-arousing stimulus

Fear-arousing stimuli elicit innate reactions and can reinforce acquisition of new responses. We tested whether mechanisms mediating these conditioned stimulus (CS) properties were isomorphic or dissociable within the amygdala. Rats trained on a fear-conditioning task (CS paired with footshock) were then trained on an escape-from-fear task (EFF) in which the CS reinforced a locomotor response terminating the CS. Lateral nucleus (LA) lesions blocked acquisition of both conditioned freezing responses and the CS's reinforcement of a new response in the EFF task. Central nucleus (CE) lesions blocked conditioned freezing but not the EFF, whereas basal nucleus (B) lesions blocked the EFF but not conditioned freezing. Thus, activation of the LA by a CS seems to trigger conditioned reactions via CE and conditioned aversion via B activation, reduction of which reinforces new actions.     

Fear conditioning to tone, but not to context, is attenuated by lesions of the insular cortex and posterior extension of the intralaminar complex in rats

C. Shi and M. Davis (1999) recently reported that combined lesions of the posterior extension of the intralaminar complex (PINT) and caudal insular cortex (INS) block acquisition but not expression of fear-potentiated startle to discrete conditioned stimuli (CSs) and a footshock unconditioned stimulus (US) and proposed that PINT-INS projections to the amygdala constitute the essential US pathways involved in fear conditioning. The present study further tested this hypothesis by examining whether PINT-INS lesions block fear conditioning (as measured by freezing) to diffuse-context and discrete-tone CSs, and whether posttraining lesions with continued CS-US training result in extinction to the CSs. Posttraining lesions resulted in a selective attenuation of tone conditioning, but context conditioning was unaffected by pre- and posttraining lesions. These results do not support the view that the PINT-INS represent the essential US pathway in fear conditioning.     

Amygdalar lateralization in fear conditioning: evidence for greater involvement of the right amygdala

The relative contribution of left and right amygdalae in the acquisition and retention of fear conditioning was investigated in rats. Pretraining bilateral electrolytic lesions blocked the acquisition of conditioned fear to tone and context, whereas unilateral lesions induced partial impairments with no left-right amygdala differences. In contrast, posttraining bilateral and unilateral lesions produced significant deficits in the retention of conditioned fear to tone and context. Although no left-right difference was observed to tone, the right amygdala lesions generated greater deficits in contextual fear than the left amygdala lesions. These results indicate that fear conditioning is partially disrupted with unilateral amygdalar lesions, but that the right amygdala has greater involvement than the left amygdala when conditioning occurs under a normal brain state.     

Timing of impulses from the central amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis to the brain stem

The amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) are thought to subserve distinct functions, with the former mediating rapid fear responses to discrete sensory cues and the latter longer "anxiety-like" states in response to diffuse environmental contingencies. However, these structures are reciprocally connected and their projection sites overlap extensively. To shed light on the significance of BNST-amygdala connections, we compared the antidromic response latencies of BNST and central amygdala (CE) neurons to brain stem stimulation. Whereas the frequency distribution of latencies was unimodal in BNST neurons (approximately 10-ms mode), that of CE neurons was bimodal (approximately 10- and approximately 30-ms modes). However, after stria terminalis (ST) lesions, only short-latency antidromic responses were observed, suggesting that CE axons with long conduction times course through the ST. Compared with the direct route, the ST greatly lengthens the path of CE axons to the brain stem, an apparently disadvantageous arrangement. Because BNST and CE share major excitatory basolateral amygdala (BL) inputs, lengthening the path of CE axons might allow synchronization of BNST and CE impulses to brain stem when activated by BL. To test this, we applied electrical BL stimuli and compared orthodromic response latencies in CE and BNST neurons. The latency difference between CE and BNST neurons to BL stimuli approximated that seen between the antidromic responses of BNST cells and CE neurons with long conduction times. These results point to a hitherto unsuspected level of temporal coordination between the inputs and outputs of CE and BNST neurons, supporting the idea of shared functions.     

Activation of basolateral amygdala corticotropin-releasing factor 1 receptors modulates the consolidation of contextual fear

The basolateral amygdala complex (BLA) and central amygdala nucleus (CeA) are involved in fear and anxiety. In addition, the BLA contains a high density of corticotropin-releasing factor 1 (CRF₁) receptors in comparison to the CeA. However, the role of BLA CRF₁ receptors in contextual fear conditioning is poorly understood. In the present study, we first demonstrated in rats that oral administration of DMP696, the selective CRF₁ receptor antagonist, had no significant effects on the acquisition of contextual fear but produced a subsequent impairment in contextual freezing suggesting a role of CRF₁ receptors in the fear memory consolidation process. In addition, oral administration of DMP696 significantly reduced phosphorylation of cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (pCREB) in the lateral and basolateral amygdala nuclei, but not in the CeA, during the post-fear conditioning period. We then demonstrated that bilateral microinjections of DMP696 into the BLA produced no significant effects on the acquisition of conditioned fear but reduced contextual freezing in a subsequent drug-free conditioned fear test. Importantly, bilateral microinjections of DMP696 into the BLA at 5 min or 3 h, but not 9 h, after exposure to contextual fear conditioning was also effective in reducing contextual freezing in the conditioned fear test. Finally, microinfusions of either DMP696 into the CeA or a specific corticotropin-releasing factor 2 receptor antagonist in the BLA were shown to have no major effects on disrupting either contextual fear conditioning or performance of contextual freezing in the drug-free conditioned fear test. Collectively, results implicate a role of BLA CRF₁ receptors in activating the fear memory consolidation process, which may involve BLA pCREB-induced synaptic plasticity.     

Role of the extended amygdala in short-duration versus sustained fear: a tribute to Dr. Lennart Heimer

The concept of the "extended amygdala", developed and explored by Lennart Heimer, Jose de Olmos, George Alheid, and their collaborators, has had an enormous impact on the field of neuroscience and on our own work. Measuring fear-potentiated startle test using conditioned stimuli that vary in length we suggest that the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and the lateral division of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST(L)) are involved in short-term versus long-term fear responses we call phasic versus sustained fear, respectively. Outputs from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) activate the medial division of the CeA (CeA(M)) to very rapidly elicit phasic fear responses via CeA(M) projections to the hypothalamus and brainstem. The BLA also projects to the BNST(L), which together with other BNST(L) inputs from the lateral CeA (CeA(L)) initiate a slower developing, but sustained fear response, akin to anxiety. We hypothesize this occurs because the CeA(L) releases the peptide corticotropin releasing hormone (CRF) into the BNST(L) which facilitates the release of glutamate from BLA terminals. This activates the BNST(L) which projects to hypothalamic and brainstem areas similar to those innervated by the CeA(M) that mediate the specific signs of fear and anxiety. The generality of this idea is illustrated by selective studies looking at context conditioning, social defeat, drug withdrawal and stress induced reinstatement.     

Electrical stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex reduces conditioned fear in a temporally specific manner

The authors recently showed that extinction of auditory fear conditioning leads to potentiation of tone-evoked activity of neurons in the infralimbic (IL) subregion of the medial prefrontal cortex, suggesting that IL inhibits fear after extinction (M. R. Milad, & G. J. Quirk, 2002). In support of this finding, pairing conditioned tones with brief (300-ms) electrical stimulation of IL reduces conditioned freezing. The present study showed that IL stimulation inhibits freezing if given 0.1 s after tone onset (the latency of tone-evoked responses) but has no effect if given either 1 s before or 1 s after tone onset. This suggests that IL gates the response of downstream structures such as the amygdala to fear stimuli.     

The ventral hippocampus and fear conditioning in rats. Different anterograde amnesias of fear after tetrodotoxin inactivation and infusion of the GABA(A) agonist muscimol

Studies on the involvement of the rat hippocampus in classical fear conditioning have focused mainly on the dorsal hippocampus and conditioning to a context. However, the ventral hippocampus has intimate connections with the amygdala and the nucleus accumbens, which are involved in classical fear conditioning to explicit and contextual cues. Consistently, a few recent lesion studies have indicated a role for the ventral hippocampus in classical fear conditioning to explicit and contextual cues. The present study examined whether neuronal activity within the ventral hippocampus is important for the formation of fear memory to explicit and contextual cues by classical fear conditioning. Tetrodotoxin (TTX; 10 ng/side), which completely blocks neuronal activity, or muscimol (1 microg/side), which increases GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibition, were bilaterally infused into the ventral hippocampus of Wistar rats before the conditioning session of a classical fear-conditioning experiment. Conditioning to a tone and the context were assessed using freezing as a measure of conditioned fear. TTX blocked fear conditioning to both tone and context. Muscimol only blocked fear conditioning to the context. The data of the present study indicate that activity of neurons in the ventral hippocampus is necessary for the formation of fear memory to both explicit and contextual cues and that neurons in the ventral hippocampus that bear the GABA(A) receptor are important for the formation of fear conditioning to a context. In addition, both bilateral muscimol (0.5 microg/side and 1 microg/side) and TTX (5 ng/side and 10 ng/side) infusion into the ventral hippocampus dose-dependently decreased locomotor activity in an open-field experiment.     

A role for anterior thalamic nuclei in contextual fear memory

Understanding the neural processes that govern the attribution of a predictive value to environmental stimuli is a major issue in behavioural neuroscience. The main strategy to explore this question has been the use of Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigms. While a majority of studies have focussed on the specific role of the hippocampus and amygdala in contextual versus cued fear, very few studies examined the potential role of subcortical limbic areas. Among those, the anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) connect to both the hippocampus and the amygdala and also to the cingulate region which is known to support fear-related activity. Here, we show that rats sustaining ATN lesions exhibit a specific impairment following context but not tone conditioning. ATN lesions slowed down acquisition without preventing normal freezing behaviour when rats were reexposed to the conditioning context 24 h later. However, ATN rats exhibited poor retrieval of contextual but not cued fear when assessed 3 weeks after conditioning. In addition, extinction was faster in ATN rats and spontaneous recovery of contextual fear was impaired by the lesions. These deficits indicate that contextual fear memories established in the absence of the ATN are not robust. Collectively, these findings support an involvement of the ATN in the circuits underlying contextual fear memory.     

Stimulation at a site of auditory-somatosensory convergence in the medial geniculate nucleus is an effective unconditioned stimulus for fear conditioning.

The medial division of the medial geniculate nucleus (MGm) and the posterior intralaminar nucleus (PIN) are necessary for fear conditioning to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS), receive both auditory and somatosensory input, and project to the amygdala, which is involved in production of fear conditioned responses. If CS-unconditioned stimulus (US) convergence in the MGm-PIN is critical for fear conditioning, then microstimulation of this area should serve as an effective US during classical conditioning, in place of standard footshock. Guinea pigs underwent conditioning (40-60 trials) using a tone as the CS and medial geniculate complex microstimulation as the US. Conditioned bradycardia developed when the US electrodes were in the PIN. However, microstimulation was not an effective US for conditioning in other parts of the medial geniculate or for sensitization training in the PIN or elsewhere. Learning curves were similar to those found previously for footshock US. Thus, the PIN can be a locus of functional CS-US convergence for previously for footshock US. Thus, the PIN can be a locus of functional CS-US convergence for fear conditioning to acoustic stimuli.     

Effects of lesions in the central nucleus and lateral nucleus of the amygdala on fear conditioning with a visual conditioned stimulus in rats

Lesions in the central nucleus or lateral nucleus of the amygdala have been known to interfere with the acquisition of fear conditioning when a sound is used as a conditioned stimulus (CS). The present study examined whether or not a similar interference would occur with a visual CS. Seven rats with lesions in the central nucleus (AMY-C group), 8 with lesions in the lateral nucleus (AMY-L group), and 16 unoperated control rats were trained using a visual CS (25 W light, 3.7 s duration) paired with footshock (1.0 mA, 0.5 s). The behavioral index of fear conditioning was a potentiation of startle reflex in the presence of CS. All control rats and AMY-L group showed the potentiation, but AMY-C group did not. These results suggest that the lateral nucleus of the amygdala may not be involved in fear conditioning to a visual CS. It is possible that each modality of CS has a specific pathway to the central nucleus of the amygdala to mediate fear conditioning.     

N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism blocks contextual fear conditioning and differentially regulates early growth response-1 messenger RNA expression in the amygdala: implications for a functional amygdaloid circuit of fear

N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the amygdala are known to be crucial for the learning of conditioned fear, although the molecular cascades that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors regulate are not well understood. Recent experiments from our laboratory have shown that messenger RNA expression of the immediate-early messenger gene, early growth response gene 1, increases in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala following contextual fear conditioning. However, the regulation of the increase in early growth response gene 1 expression is not known. To determine if N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors regulate both fear conditioning and the increase in early growth response gene 1 expression in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala, rats were infused i.c.v. with 2.5microg of the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate. Most rats were killed 30min following one-trial contextual fear conditioning and their brains were processed for in situ hybridization detection of early growth response gene 1 messenger RNA expression. The remainder of the rats was tested for retention of fear conditioning 24h later. In DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate-treated rats, post-shock freezing remained intact, whereas fear-conditioned freezing during the retention test was abolished. Image analysis of early growth response gene 1 messenger RNA revealed that DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate blocked the fear-conditioning-associated increase in early growth response gene 1 expression in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala. In addition, DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate significantly increased early growth response gene 1 expression in the central nucleus of the amygdala. The results reveal differential regulation of early growth response gene 1 messenger RNA in the amygdala by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and argue for a functional role of early growth response gene 1 in the formation of long-term memory for contextual fear. Furthermore, the results indicate a functional neuroanatomical circuit within the amygdala that includes dampening of excitatory and activation of inhibitory processes in distinct amygdala nuclei, resulting in the reduction of fear conditioning.     

An infusion of bupivacaine into the nucleus accumbens disrupts the acquisition but not the expression of contextual fear conditioning

An infusion of the local anesthetic bupivacaine into the nucleus accumbens (Acb) impaired the acquisition but not the expression of fear responses (freezing) to a shocked context but spared both the acquisition and expression of these responses to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with the shock. In contrast, an infusion of bupivacaine into the amygdala impaired the acquisition and the expression of fear responses to both the CS and the context. The results demonstrate a critical role for the Acb in the acquisition but not the expression of contextual fear conditioning and are consistent with the view that this structure is involved in the processes by which rats represent a context.     

The indirect amygdala-dorsal striatum pathway mediates conditioned freezing: insights on emotional memory networks

The dorsal striatum (DS) is involved in various forms of learning and memory such as procedural learning, habit learning, reward-association and emotional learning. We have previously reported that bilateral DS lesions disrupt tone fear conditioning (TFC), but not contextual fear conditioning (CFC) [Ferreira TL, Moreira KM, Ikeda DC, Bueno OFA, Oliveira MGM (2003) Effects of dorsal striatum lesions in tone fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning. Brain Res 987:17-24]. To further elucidate the participation of DS in emotional learning, in the present study, we investigated the effects of bilateral pretest (postraining) electrolytic DS lesions on TFC. Given the well-acknowledged role of the amygdala in emotional learning, we also examined a possible cooperation between DS and the amygdala in TFC, by using asymmetrical electrolytic lesions, consisting of a unilateral lesion of the central amygdaloid nucleus (CeA) combined to a contralateral DS lesion. The results show that pre-test bilateral DS lesions disrupt TFC responses, suggesting that DS plays a role in the expression of TFC. More importantly, rats with asymmetrical pre-training lesions were impaired in TFC, but not in CFC tasks. This result was confirmed with muscimol asymmetrical microinjections in DS and CeA, which reversibly inactivate these structures. On the other hand, similar pretest lesions as well as unilateral electrolytic lesions of CeA and DS in the same hemisphere did not affect TFC. Possible anatomical substrates underlying the observed effects are proposed. Overall, the present results underscore that other routes, aside from the well-established CeA projections to the periaqueductal gray, may contribute to the acquisition/consolidation of the freezing response associated to a TFC task. It is suggested that CeA may presumably influence DS processing via a synaptic relay on dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra compacta and retrorubral nucleus. The present observations are also in line with other studies showing that TFC and CFC responses are mediated by different anatomical networks.     

New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear

It is currently believed that the acquisition of classically conditioned fear involves potentiation of conditioned thalamic inputs in the lateral amygdala (LA). In turn, LA cells would excite more neurons in the central nucleus (CE) that, via their projections to the brain stem and hypothalamus, evoke fear responses. However, LA neurons do not directly contact brain stem-projecting CE neurons. This is problematic because CE projections to the periaqueductal gray and pontine reticular formation are believed to generate conditioned freezing and fear-potentiated startle, respectively. Moreover, like LA, CE may receive direct thalamic inputs communicating information about the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Finally, recent evidence suggests that the CE itself may be a critical site of plasticity. This review attempts to reconcile the current model with these observations. We suggest that potentiated LA outputs disinhibit CE projection neurons via GABAergic intercalated neurons, thereby permitting associative plasticity in CE. Thus plasticity in both LA and CE would be necessary for acquisition of conditioned fear. This revised model also accounts for inhibition of conditioned fear after extinction.