Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland: consensus views of teachers

Posterior composite resin restorations are an established feature of contemporary dental practice and all new dental graduates should be competent in providing such treatments for their patients. Surveys of educational curricula in this area in the United Kingdom and Ireland, as well as North America, have demonstrated variations both within and between dental schools. Such inconsistency does not help new dental school graduates, and may lead to confusion. At the British Association of Teachers of Conservative Dentistry Annual Conference held in Birmingham in September 2005, a session was devoted to the development of guidelines for dental schools on teaching posterior composite resin restorations to dental undergraduates. The theme of the conference concerned the teaching implications for changing from amalgam to composite. Two of the principal speakers at the meeting (Joost Roeters and Niek Opdam) were from the dental school at the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands. This school was the first in Europe to discontinue the use of dental amalgam in its undergraduate curriculum over a decade ago. This paper reports the consensus views of those present on guidelines for teaching posterior composite resin restorations to dental undergraduate students.     

Amalgam phase down: baseline data preceding implementation in Nigeria

Objective: The Minimata Convention on mercury includes amalgam phase-down and eventual phase-out from dentistry. To aid its subsequent evaluation it is important to have baseline data of amalgam use in a locality prior to implementing a phase-down. Methodology: Records of patients spanning 5 years from January 2011 to January 2016 were analysed to determine and the compare frequency of amalgam usage with other dental materials for carious teeth restorations in a Nigerian university teaching hospital. Classes of cavities restored and cadres of operators who employed the different materials were included. Institutional ethics committee approval was obtained prior to commencing the study. Results: 2,058 patients’ records were retrieved, 59% females and 41% males. Their ages ranged 19–80 years, mean 33.5 ± 12.7 years, young adults 20–39 years old were the majority (62.9%). Filling materials included 57.5% amalgam, 17.6% glass ionomer cement (GIC) and 24.9% resin composite. Class I restorations constituted 70.5% of amalgam restorations, while Class II restorations made up 29.4% and Class V restorations accounted for 0.1%. Undergraduate dental students placed most of the amalgam restorations (60.5%), and 78.9% of all their restorations were amalgam. Less experienced dentists used all materials equally; the more experienced dentists placed more composite resin and GIC (43.3%). Conclusion: Amalgam fillings constituted nearly 60% of the restorations of carious teeth. Training of dental students in placement of non-mercury alternatives to amalgam and Minimum Intervention Dentistry needs to be emphasized in dental schools. Phase-down of amalgam should be intensified in Nigeria with the ultimate aim of a phase-out in line with the Minamata Convention.Key words: Amalgam, phase-down, Nigeria, dental caries     

Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students

Using the information from remake request slips in a dental school's predoctoral clinic, we examined the short-term survival of Class II resin composite restorations versus Class II dental amalgam restorations. In the student clinic, resin composite is used in approximately 58 percent of Class II restorations placed, and dental amalgam is used in the remaining 42 percent. In the period examined, Class II resin composite restorations were ten times more likely to be replaced at no cost to the patient than Class II dental amalgam restorations. A total of eighty-four resin composite restorations and six amalgam restorations were replaced due to an identified failure.     

Further study of restored and un-restored teeth subjected to high temperatures

Forensic dentistry has been shown to be of fundamental importance in medico-legal investigations aimed at identifying human remains involving high temperature incidents because dental remains and prosthetic devices are resistant to quite high thermal change. In this project we studied teeth containing class I and V amalgam and composite fillings and compared them to un-restored teeth when exposed to high temperatures. Twenty five un-restored teeth, 25 teeth with class I amalgam restorations, 25 teeth with class V amalgam restorations and 25 teeth with class I composite fillings were placed in a furnace and heated at a rate of 30 degrees C/min. The effects at the predetermined temperatures 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 and 1100 degrees C were examined macroscopically and then observed microscopically by means of a stereomicroscope. Our observations showed that the class I amalgam restorations at the different temperature levels remained in place, maintaining their shape despite disintegration of the crowns, whilst the class I composite restorations remained in place but in an altered shape. Comparing restored with un-restored teeth we observed different responses in crown disintegration at the different temperature levels.     

A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the longevity of class I and II amalgam and composite resin restorations placed in a general practice. METHODS: Patient records of a general practice were used for collecting the data for this study. From the files longevity and reasons for failure of 2867 class I and II amalgam and composite resin restorations placed in 621 patients by two operators between 1990 and 1997 were recorded in 2002. RESULTS: 912 amalgam restorations (502 by operator 1 and 410 by operator 2) and 1955 posterior composite resin restorations (1470 by operator 1 and 485 by operator 2) were placed. One hundred and eighty-two amalgam and 259 posterior composite resin restorations failed during the observation period. The main reasons for failure of the restorations were caries (34%), endodontic treatment (12%) and fracture of the tooth (13%). Life tables calculated from the data reveal a survival for composite resin of 91.7% at 5 years and 82.2% at 10 years. For amalgam the survival is 89.6% at 5 years and 79.2% at 10 years. Cox-regression analysis resulted in a significant effect of the amount of restored surfaces on the survival of the restorations. No significant effect of operator, material as well as combination of material and operator was found. SIGNIFICANCE: In the investigated general practice, two dentists obtained comparable longevity for amalgam and composite resin restorations.     

Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the teaching program of Class I and Class II resin-based composite (RBC) restorations in Brazilian dental schools and to observe if any differences were found from similar surveys conducted in North American, European, and Japanese dental schools. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire containing 15 questions was distributed to 92 Brazilian dental schools, and 64 (70%) schools returned the questionnaire. The questions inquired the amount of time the curriculum dedicated to teaching of posterior RBC restorations, future expectation regarding the teaching time, limitation in extension of the occlusal width and the proximal box in Class II, contraindications for placing posterior RBC restorations, protocol for using bases and liners, brand of bonding agents and RBC used, instruments and techniques employed for finishing, cost relative to amalgam restorations, and biologic reactions related to the use of posterior RBC. The responses were calculated as percentages based on the number of schools that responded to the questionnaire. Where appropriate, the Chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the dental schools that responded, 88% dedicated 10% to 50% of the teaching time in operative dentistry to posterior RBC restorations. A significant correlation (P = 0.041) was found between the percentage of time dedicated to the teaching of posterior RBC restorations and the higher cost of posterior RBC compared to amalgam restorations. Resin-based composite restorations cost 30% to 70% more than amalgam restorations in the 40% of dental schools that charged a fee. Posterior composites for large restorations in molars were used by 14% of the dental schools. Base and liner were not placed by 10% of dental schools in deep Class I or Class II RBC restorations. One school did not recommend acid etching of the dentin. CONCLUSION: No major differences were found in the teaching philosophy of posterior RBC restorations by comparing the Brazilian data to the data from similar surveys done in North America, Japan, and Europe.     

Challenges to teaching posterior composites in the United Kingdom and Ireland

Recent surveys from general dental practice have found increased placement of direct composite resin restorations in occlusal (Class I) and occlusoproximal (Class II) cavities in permanent teeth by general dental practitioners. This has been matched, and possibly driven, at least in part, by the development of new composite resin materials and bonding technologies. Recent studies by the authors have found an increase in the teaching of Class I and Class II composite resin restorations in the UK, Ireland, the US, and Canada. The increased teaching in the UK and Ireland, however, was not as great as in North America, and several worrying trends were observed. The aim of this paper is to discuss these trends and related factors considered important to the necessary further development of the teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite resin restorations, let alone modern operative dentistry in general, in the UK and Ireland.     

Sealants: where we have been; where we are going

Sealants are a critical component to the restorative dentistry armamentarium. The introduction of the acid-etch technique has made the sealing of occlusal surfaces effective. Rather than waiting for an occlusal surface to break down to the extent that an occlusal Class I amalgam restoration is indicated, extending preparations to include all caries-susceptible pits and fissures, an occlusal sealant can be placed to prevent caries. Sealants have been shown to be effective when used alone over acid-etched enamel or in conjunction with a methacylate-containing adhesive. Pit and fissure caries can be restored conservatively using resin composite or amalgam, utilizing sealant to prevent future caries. The increasing use of direct and indirect resin composites for Class I and Class II restorations includes the use of sealants over restoration margins and polished resin composite. A newly developed sealant, Clinpro, extends to all pits and fissures that are desirable to seal and is efficient and effective to place.     

3D evaluation of composite resin restoration at practical training using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)

Internal adaptation of restorations to the cavity wall is one of the important topics in clinical dentistry. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility to utilize the non-invasive tomographic imaging system for teaching the importance of cavity adaptation at dental school pre-clinical training. Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) was used for detection of marginal and internal defects in the composite resin restorations as an educational device. Class 1 and Class 2 composite restorations to melamine resin molar tooth were assigned to the students and prepared during the skill test, and SS-OCT imaging was performed to evaluate students' works. SS-OCT could detect the internal gaps and voids within the restorations in tomography images synthesized based on the backscatter signal from within the restoration. It is suggested that the SS-OCT is promising diagnostic modality, as well as educational imaging device for the detection of internal gaps in adhesive restorations.     

The future of dental amalgam

This paper is a comment on 'The enigma of dental amalgam' by Carl Leinfelder published in 2004 in the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. In that paper a warning is stated against a too abrupt change from amalgam towards resin composite, because this will bring a lot of clinical problems due to the limited skills of todays' dentists in placing posterior composite resin restorations. However, the situation in The Netherlands is different since a gradual changeover from amalgam towards resin composites has taken place during the last decades and dental schools have skipped training in placing amalgam restorations out of the curriculum. Clinical studies on the longevity of amalgam and resin composite restorations placed by dental students and dentists who are experienced in both composite resin and amalgam placement show a comparable and acceptable annual failure rate for those restorations. It is concluded that a gradual changeover from amalgam towards composite resin is preferred to avoid clinical problems.     

Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options

The purpose of this paper is to provide guidelines to assist in the selection of dental materials for restoring posterior teeth in adolescents. Currently, amalgam is still the best plastic restorative material for some Class I cavities, and for Class II cavities and all multi-surface restorations. Tooth-coloured materials are preferred by some patients and dentists, however these alternatives are more technique sensitive than amalgam. Composite resin is the most common direct placement alternative to dental amalgam, providing patients with relatively low cost, tooth-coloured restorations. However, composite resins have limited indication, their placement is more time-consuming than for amalgam, cost-benefit considerations are a concern, difficulty in obtaining a marginal seal persists and there are few long-term studies published in the peer reviewed scientific literature. The literature currently supports the use of composite resin for the restoration of a limited range of Class I and Class II cavities. Composite resin restorations are not recommended for MOD or other multi-surface restorations. In selected clinical situations, fissure sealants, preventive resin restorations and glass ionomer cement are also appropriate materials to use to restore posterior teeth. Fissure sealants, when properly maintained, can play a significant role in the prevention and control of dental caries in pits and fissures in primary and permanent teeth. Preventive resin restorations should be placed to restore deep pits and fissures with incipient caries and/or developmental defects in primary and permanent teeth. Glass ionomer cement may be used for restoring Class V cavities where appearance is not the primary concern, for conservative Class III cavities, and as a provisional restorative material. It is not recommended for Class II or IV restorations.     

Teaching of posterior composite resin restorations in undergraduate dental schools in Ireland and the United Kingdom

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the current teaching of posterior composite resin restorations to undergraduate dental students in Ireland and the United Kingdom (UK). The investigation was a follow-up to a survey undertaken in 1997. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to the Heads of Departments of Restorative Dentistry/Units of Operative Dentistry in each of the 15 dental schools with undergraduate dental degree programmes in Ireland and the UK. The questionnaire sought information relating to the teaching of posterior composite resin restorations in each dental school. RESULTS: Fifteen completed questionnaires were returned (response rate = 100%). All schools (n = 15) taught the placement of composite resin restorations in occlusal cavities, 14 schools taught composite resin placement in two-surface occlusoproximal cavities and nine schools taught composite resin placement in three-surface occlusoproximal cavities. Respondents anticipated that the amount of preclinical teaching of posterior composite resin placement will increase twofold over the next 5 years, whilst the corresponding teaching of amalgam will fall to two-thirds its current level. Variation was found between dental schools in the teaching of the principles of cavity design, contraindications to placement, indications for lining and basing techniques, matrix and wedging techniques, and the use of curing lights. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of teaching of posterior composite resin restorations in undergraduate dental schools in Ireland and the UK has increased since the time of a previous survey in 1997. Composite resin may soon equal or overtake amalgam as the material of choice when restoring posterior cavities in Irish and UK dental schools. There was, however, much variation in the nature and extent of the teaching and the techniques taught.     

Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school

This study recorded the number of preclinical lecture and simulation laboratory sessions spent teaching the preparation and placement of amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations. These data were compared to the use of both materials in the operative clinic as placed by third- and fourth-year students. The number of posterior restorations inserted by the students, expressed as a function of the number of restoration surfaces, was also evaluated. The results show that the teaching of posterior restorations pre-clinically has consistently favored amalgam 2.5 to 1 during the last three years. However, clinically, resin composite is being used for posterior restorations 2.3 times more often than amalgam. The only instance that favored amalgam over composite during the last year was in the placement of four surface posterior restorations. This shift in emphasis from amalgam to composite needs to be addressed within dental educational institutions so that newly graduated dentists are prepared to place composite restorations properly.     

Fracture strength of Class I versus Class II restored premolars tested at the marginal ridge. I. Standard preparations

Two groups of maxillary premolars with Class I cavities were prepared with one marginal ridge thickness to a width of 1.0 mm. One group was restored with amalgam and the other group with composite resin. Two groups of Class II cavities also were prepared and restored with amalgam and composite resin. The teeth in the four treatment groups were subjected to a centric load at the marginal ridge until fracture occurred. A two-factor analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant difference between the class of preparation (Class I preparations were weaker than were Class II preparations) but differences in strength between restorative materials (composite resin versus amalgam) and the interaction effect (class of preparation x restorative materials) were not found to be statistically significant (alpha = .05). A Newman-Keuls sequential range test found no statistically significant differences in strength between groups (alpha = .05). Fracture patterns were observed under scanning electron microscope. Fractures extended into the enamel and into the material in the Class I composite resin, Class I amalgam, and Class II composite resin restorations. Fractures extended only into the material in Class II amalgam restorations.     

A 5-year study comparing a posterior composite resin and an amalgam

Eighty class I and class II light-cured posterior composite resin restorations were compared with 43 class I and class II amalgam restorations during a 5-year period after placement. The results of this clinical study showed that both materials were satisfactory during the time period and that the only significant statistical differences are a poorer marginal integrity for the amalgam and a greater wear rate for the composite resin.     

Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the reasons given by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers for placement and replacement of restorations. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Each participant was asked to record the reason for placement or replacement of restorations. The age and class of the restoration being replaced were also recorded, as was the material being used and the material being replaced (if known). RESULTS: Details of the reason for placement or replacement was received on 9,031 restorations. Of the restorations placed, 53.9% were amalgam, 29.8% were resin composite, and 16.3% were glass-ionomer cement. The reasons for placement or replacement of the restorations were principally primary caries (41.3%), secondary caries (21.9%), tooth fracture (6.4%), marginal fracture or degradation (6.1%), and noncarious defects (5.8%). Of the amalgam restorations, most were placed to restore Class II and Class I preparations (65.8% and 29.9%, respectively). Of the composite restorations, most were placed in Class III and Class V cavities (35.5% and 26.3%, respectively). Glass-ionomer cement was used predominantly to restore Class V cavities (63.5%). CONCLUSION: Secondary caries was the most prevalent reason for replacement of restorations, regardless of material. Statistical analysis indicated that amalgam provided significantly greater longevity than composite or glass-ionomer materials.     

The influence of resin composite and bonded amalgam restorations on dentine permeability in Class II cavities in vitro

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to measure and compare dentine permeability reduction in Class II preparations, after restoration with resin composite or bonded amalgam, using either a multi-step or one-bottle dental adhesive system. METHODS: An in vitro fluid transport model was used to measure initial dentine permeability in Class II cavities with an intact smear layer in crown segments from extracted human premolars. One week and 3 months after restoration with resin composite or bonded amalgam, using either multi-step or one-bottle dental adhesive system, the measurements were repeated and the reduction in permeability was calculated as a percentage of the initial values. The data were analyzed statistically using a one-way ANOVA and Least Significant Difference tests. RESULTS: After 1 week the resin composite with one-bottle dental adhesive system provided the highest reduction in dentine permeability, whereas after 3 months the bonded amalgam caused the highest reduction. At both time intervals the resin composite with multi-step adhesive system provided the lowest reduction. (P=0.036 at 1 week, P=0.016 at 3 months). After 3-months storage in water a significant increase in dentine permeability reduction was found in the bonded amalgam group only (P=0.017). The reduction in dentine permeability provided by resin composite with one-bottle dental adhesive system and bonded amalgam in Class II cavities was similar at both time intervals. (P=0.182 at 1 week, P=0.750 at 3 months). SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study indicated that on the basis of reducing dentine permeability in vitro, resin composite restorations with the investigated one-bottle adhesive system was superior to its multi-step equivalent and bonded amalgam can also be preferred in Class II restorations.     

The value of extended-setting-time amalgam in pre-clinical practice in undergraduate dental training

This is a single-blind controlled study investigating the advantages of extended-setting time dental amalgam compared to a standard amalgam in the training of undergraduate dental students. 50 dental students were randomly assigned 1 of the 2 alloys for each restoration placed in the study. Each student placed class I and class II restorations in extracted human teeth mounted in typodont arches. 449 completed restorations were available for assessment, 228 restorations in the experimental group and 221 restorations in the control group. The test restorations were overall marginally inferior to those of the control group. There appears to be no advantage in using extended-setting time dental amalgam in undergraduate training.     

From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland

The aim of this study was to obtain information on restorative dental care in Finland and to analyze the changes in treatment over a 5-year period. A random sample of dentists was drawn from the registers of the health authorities and the dental association in Finland, and in the spring of 1997 a questionnaire was sent requesting the dentists to record information for each restoration placed during a given period. A total of 1,229 dentists were contacted, and 659 responded. The dentists treated 5,305 adults during the study period and placed 6,322 restorations. The most common restorative material was composite resin, which was used in 74.9% of the restorations, whereas amalgam was used in 4.8% and glass ionomers in 9.4% of the restorations. The median ages of failed restorations were nearly 12 years for amalgam, slightly less than 5 years for composite, and slightly more than 4 years for glass ionomer. The results indicate that clinical dentistry in Finland has made a definite step towards the post-amalgam era. However, the functional periods of the failed tooth-colored restorations were disappointingly short and warrant some serious consideration.     

Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.

Previous long-term longitudinal studies of two different methods of placing an auto-cured conventional anterior composite resin, and of a low- and a high-copper amalgam alloy, had shown similar restoration survivals despite the different resin treatment methods used or the types of amalgam alloy placed. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess several clinical factors or characteristics of these restorations that were believed to affect the survival of the restorative materials. The 950 composite resin and the 1042 amalgam restorations examined were placed by many operators in numerous patients attending a dental hospital. The composite resin restorations were placed using unetched- and etched-enamel-bonding treatment methods, and the amalgam restorations were polished after insertion. Clinical ratings supplemented by color transparencies were used for the assessment of four factors for the resin, and four factors for the amalgam restoration. Significant deterioration differences were found for several of the clinical factors assessed for both the two different composite resin treatment methods, and for the two different amalgam alloys, which were not directly related to the restoration survivals.