Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveSpinal fusion surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain. We examined whether bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block could alleviate postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.DesignBlinded, randomized, controlled study.SettingTertiary university hospital, operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward.PatientsSixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II scheduled for lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomized into the erector spinae plane block group (ESPB group) and the control group in a 1:1 ratio.InterventionsPre-operative ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block was performed in the ESPB group, while sham subcutaneous infiltration was performed in the control group.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was pain intensity at rest within 12 h postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included NRS pain scores at rest and on movement, postoperative opioid consumption and proportions of patients requiring opioid during the first 48 h after surgery.Main resultsThe ESPB group (n = 30) showed significantly lower pain scores at rest at 4 h after surgery (estimated mean difference − 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.4 to −0.8, p < 0.001), at 8 h (−1.3, 95% CI -1.9 to −0.6, p < 0.001), and at 12 h (−0.7, 95% CI -1.3 to −0.1, p = 0.023). The two groups showed similar pain scores at rest at 24 h after surgery (estimated mean difference − 0.2, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.5) and 48 h (−0.3, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.2). The ESPB group also showed significantly lower pain score on movement at 4 h after surgery (−1.5, 95% CI -2.5 to −0.6). The ESPB group showed a significantly smaller proportion of patients requiring sufentanil within 12 h after surgery (p = 0.020), and the group consumed significantly less sufentanil during that period (p = 0.042).ConclusionsBilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improves postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.     

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objectiveThe erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newly defined regional anesthesia technique first introduced in 2016. The aim of this study is to determine its analgesic efficacy compared with non-block care and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB).DesignWe systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science citation index, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov register searched up to March 2020. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared an ESPB to non-block care or TPVB for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery patients. Primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane methodology.Results14 RCTs that comprised 1018 patients were included. Seven trials involved thoracic surgery patients and seven included breast surgery patients. Meta-analysis revealed that ESPB significantly reduced 24-hour opioid consumption compared with the non-block groups (−10.5 mg; 95% CI: −16.49 to −3.81; p = 0.002; I² = 99%). Similarly, the finding was consistent in subgroup analysis between the breast surgery (−7.75 mg; 95%CI −13.98 to −1.51; p = 0.01; I² = 97%) and thoracic surgery (−14.81 mg; 95%CI −21.18 to −8.44; p < 0.001; I² = 96%) subgroups. The ESPB significantly reduced pain scores at rest or movement at various time points postoperatively compared with non-block group, and reduced the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (OR 0.48; 95%CI 0.27 to 0.86; p = 0.01; I² = 0%). In contrast, there were no significative differences reported in any of the outcomes for ESPB versus TPVB strata.ConclusionsESPB improved analgesic efficacy in breast and thoracic surgery patients compared with non-block care. Furthermore, current literature supported the ESPB offered comparable analgesic efficacy to a TPVB.     

Benefits and risks of intermittent bolus erector spinae plane block through a catheter for patients after cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy: A propensity score matched retrospective cohort study

Study objectiveA lateral mini-thoracotomy approach to cardiac surgery causes severe and complicated postoperative pain compared to the sternotomy approach. In this study we assessed the benefits and risks of intermittent bolus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) via a catheter for patients who underwent cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy.DesignA propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.SettingUniversity hospital.Patients452 consecutive patients that underwent cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy from 2018 to 2020.InterventionsPatients who received intermittent bolus ESPB through a catheter for 3 days (ESPB group, n = 93) were compared with patients who did not receive any regional anesthesia (Control group, n = 174) after propensity score matching.MeasurementsThe primary endpoint was postoperative in-hospital cumulative opioid consumption (calculated as oral morphine milligram equivalents, MME). The secondary outcomes were intraoperative sufentanil doses, therapeutic use of antiemetic, pulmonary infection (assessed using a modified clinical pulmonary infection score, CPIS), durations of ICU and hospital stays, and ESPB related/unrelated complications.Main resultsThere is a lower oral MME in the ESPB group, 266 ± 126 mg in the ESPB group vs. 346 ± 105 mg in the control group (95% CI -113 to −46; P < 0.01). Fewer patients received therapeutic antiemetic agents in the ESPB group (30% vs. 42%, odds ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99; P = 0.04). The modified CPIS in the ESPB group is lower: 1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 1.0 (95% CI -0.9 to −0.3; P < 0.01) on postoperative day 1; 1.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 0.9 (95% CI -0.7 to −0.2; P < 0.01) on postoperative day 2. The observed complications associated with ESPB include pneumothorax (1%), staxis around stomas (5%), hypotension (1%), catheter displacement (3%), and catheter obstruction (2%). None of the patients had any adverse outcomes.ConclusionIntermittent bolus ESPB is relatively safe and correlated with a reduction in the use of opioids and antiemetics for cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy.     

Impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative quality of recovery in video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective,randomized, controlled trial

Study objectiveRegional anesthesia improves postoperative analgesia and enhances the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery. We examine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on QoR after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).DesignProspective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.SettingSingle institution, tertiary university hospital.PatientsAdult patients who scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study.InterventionsWe randomly allocated patients to receive preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB with 25 ml of either 0.5% ropivacaine (ESPB group) or normal saline (Control group).MeasurementsThe primary outcome was QoR as measured by the 40-item QoR questionnaire (QoR-40) score at postoperative day 1. Secondary results were post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, acute postoperative pain, cumulative opioid consumption, the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction.Main resultsThe global QoR-40 score at postoperative day 1 (median, interquartile range) was significantly higher in the ESPB group (174, 170 to 177) than the control group (161.5, 160 to 165), estimated median difference 11 (95% CI 9 to 13, P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, single-injection of ESPB reduced PACU discharge time, acute postoperative pain, and cumulative opioid consumption. Correspondingly, the median patient satisfaction scores were higher in the ESPB group than the control group (9 versus 7, P < 0.001).ConclusionPreoperative single-injection thoracic ESPB with ropivacaine improves QoR, postoperative analgesia, and patient satisfaction after VATS.     

Effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain after open lumbar spinal surgery: a double-blind,randomized controlled trial

Purpose

The peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) are an important part of the multimodal analgesia for reducing postoperative pain, opioids consumption and its side effects. A new PNB, Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), has been revealed postoperative analgesic effect in various surgical procedures such as breast, thoracic and abdominal surgery, with the limitation of the studies for spine surgery. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after open lumbar spinal surgery.

Methods

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty-two patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. The ESPB group (n = 31) received ultrasound (US)-guided bilateral ESPB using 20 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine with adrenaline 5 mcg/ml per side. The control group (n = 31) received no intervention. The same postoperative analgesia regimen was applied by oral acetaminophen 10–15 mg/kg every 6 h, naproxen 250 mg twice daily, and intravenous (IV) morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. The postoperative morphine consumption, numerical pain score (NRS) and the side effects were recorded.

Results

The bilateral ESPB group reduced the 24 h-morphine consumption by 42.9% (P < 0.001), decreased overall pain score at rest by 1.4 points (P = 0.02), and decreased overall pain score on movement by 2.2 points (P < 0.001). No severe complications related to the block technique or morphine used occurred.

Conclusion

The US-guided bilateral ESPB demonstrated the effectiveness for postoperative analgesia management after open lumbar spinal surgery regarding reduced opioid consumption and pain score without any serious complications.

     

Duloxetine for the treatment acute postoperative pain in adult patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BackgroundDuloxetine administered during the acute perioperative period has been associated with lesser postoperative pain and analgesic consumption.Study objectivesThe study aimed to quantify the pooled effects of duloxetine on postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and side-effects in the first 48 postoperative (PO) hours.DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis.SettingPostoperative pain management.PatientsAdult patients undergoing elective surgery.Search strategy and study selection. Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched without language restrictions for prospective, parallel randomized controlled trials comparing duloxetine to placebo for the management of postoperative pain in adult patients.MeasurementsPain scores (11-point scales), opioid consumption (i.v. morphine equivalents), and frequency of side-effects were compared between duloxetine and placebo. Effect sizes were summarized as mean differences (MD), standardized mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR) with the respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were used to classify the quality of evidence.ResultsThirteen studies were included. Duloxetine decreased pain at 24 h (MD = −0.66 points; 95% CI = −1.14 to −0.19 points; SMD = −0.59; 95% CI = −1.06 to −0.12; p = 0.01; I2 = 88%), and at 48 PO hours (MD = −0.90 points; 95% CI = −1.54 to −0.26 points; SMD = −0.66; 95% CI = −0.94 to −0.38; p = 0.01; I2 = 93%); and opioid consumption at 24 PO hours (MD = −8.21 mg; 95% CI = −13.32 mg to −3.10 mg; SMD = −2.17; 95% CI = −3.10 to −1.24; p < 0.001; I2 = 95%), and at 48 PO hours (MD = 7.71 mg; 95% CI = −13.86 mg to −1.56 mg; SMD = −2.13; 95% CI = −3.51 to −0.75; p = 0.02; I2 = 97%). Duloxetine did not affect the prevalence of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) pruritus, headache or dizziness. High inter-study heterogeneity and within-study bias resulted in very-low quality of evidence for the primary outcomes.ConclusionsAlthough statistically significant effects of duloxetine were found on postoperative pain and opioid consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours, the effect sizes were below the expected minimal clinically relevant differences. Also, high risk-of-bias and inter-study heterogeneity caused the very-low quality of evidence (GRADE). We conclude that the currently available evidence does not support the clinical use of duloxetine for the management of acute postoperative pain.     

The effect of preoperative erector spinae plane vs. paravertebral blocks on patient-controlled oxycodone consumption after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective randomized,blinded, non-inferiority study

Study objectiveTo investigate the effective analgesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery.DesignIn this prospective non-inferiority study, we evaluated the postoperative analgesic effect of preoperative ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane blocks (ESPB) on T4 and T6 levels in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery in comparison with paravertebral block (PVB) at the same intervertebral spaces.SettingA university hospital.Patients66 patients scheduled to undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery under general anesthesia were included.InterventionsPatients were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided ESP blocks on T4 and T6 levels (Group ESPB, n = 33) or PVB (Group PVB, n = 33) with 30 mL 0.4% ropivacaine 30 min before anesthesia induction. A continuous flurbiprofen (8 mg/h) was infused postoperatively through a single-use infusion device and intravenous oxycodone supplied as analgesic rescue if needed, with bolus of oxycodone (1 mg) and lockout time being 10 min.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the postoperative oxycodone consumption at 48 h.Main resultsIntraoperative use of sufentanil and remifentanil were comparable between these two groups. Pain scores, oxycodone rescue and Quality of Recovery (QoR) 15 on postoperative day 1 and 2 were equivalent between these two groups. Postoperative oxycodone consumption was 7.9 ± 8.7 boluses in ESPB group and 6.9 ± 6.3 boluses in PVB group at 48 h. The cumulative 48 h difference i.e. Oxycodone boluses_{with ESPB} minus Oxycodone boluses_{with PVB} was 2 (95% CI -1, 5.6). The lower limit of the 95% CI for this difference was −1, which was within the predefined non-inferiority margin of −10 (Δ).ConclusionsUltrasound-guided ESPB applied before video assisted thoracic surgery was non-inferior in analgesic effect compared with PVB in terms of pain score, analgesic rescue consumption and quality of recovery.Brief summary statementPreoperative Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB), when in combination with round-the-clock NSAIDs, offered equivalent analgesia and quality of recovery after video assisted thoracic lung surgery compared with paravertebral blocks. Patients who received ESP blocks had similar consumption of oxycodone and length of hospital stay.     

The effect of lidocaine patch for postoperative pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study objectiveThe role of lidocaine patch (LP) in reducing postoperative pain by local anesthetic absorption has been evaluated in several studies; however, these trials have shown inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aimed to identify the benefits of LP, focusing on its pain-reducing and morphine-sparing effect in patients after surgery.DesignMeta-analysis.SettingPublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the analgesic effects of LP after surgery to those of placebo or no patch.PatientsEleven RCTs including 539 patients.InterventionsWe searched electronic databases to identify relevant RCTs.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was postoperative pain score up to 48 h assessed using a numerical rating or visual analog scale, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative morphine consumption and side effects. The effect size was estimated by calculating the mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval (CI).Main resultsLP significantly decreased postoperative pain score at 6 h (MD, −1.85; 95% CI, −2.98 to −0.72; p = 0.001), 12 h (MD, −1.48; 95% CI, −2.07 to −0.88; p < 0.001), 24 h (MD, −1.18; 95% CI, −1.65 to −0.7; p < 0.001), and 48 h (MD, −1.33; 95% CI, −2.46 to −0.19; p = 0.022). In contrast, no significant effect on postoperative morphine consumption was observed at 24 h (MD, −3.48 mg; 95% CI, −7.94 to 0.98 mg; p = 0.127) or 48 h (MD, −5.29 mg; 95% CI, −13.28 to 2.71; p = 0.195). LP was unrelated to local (RR, 1.00, 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.49; p = 0.987) or systemic side effects (RR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.11, p = 0.151).ConclusionsLP can lower postoperative pain without side effects, compared to placebo or no patch. However, its morphine-sparing effect remains unclear.     

Romosozumab versus Teriparatide for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis through a Grade Analysis of Evidence

ObjectiveTo provide a systematic review about the efficacy and safety of romosozumab and teriparatide for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.MethodRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched from electronic databases, including PubMed (1996 to June 2019), Embase (1980 to June 2019), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, June 2019), Web of Science (1998 to June 2019), and others. The primary outcomes included the following: the percentage change in bone mineral density of lumbar spine and total hip from baseline at month 6 and month 12 in each group. The secondary outcomes included the following: the percentage change in bone mineral density of femoral neck from baseline at month 6 and month 12 in each group and the incidence of adverse events at month 12 in each group.ResultsFour studies containing 1304 patients met our selection criteria. The result of our analysis indicated that romosozumab showed better effects in improving BMD of lumbar spine (month 6: MD = 3.54, 95% CI [3.13, 3.94], P<0.001; month 12: MD = 4.93, 95% CI [4.21, 5.64], P<0.001), total hip (month 6: MD = 2.27, 95% CI [0.62, 3.91], P = 0.007; month 12: MD = 3.17, 95% CI [2.68, 3.65], P<0.001), and femoral neck (month 6: MD = 2.30, 95% CI [0.51, 4.08], P = 0.01; month 12: MD = 3.04, 95% CI [2.29, 3.78], P<0.001). Also, the injection‐site reaction was less (month 12: RR = 2.84, 95% CI [1.22, 6.59], P = 0.02), but there were no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events (month 12: RR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.46, 1.33], P = 0.37) and death (month 12: RR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.08, 4.62], P = 0.63).ConclusionBased on the available studies, our current results demonstrate that romosozumab was better than teriparatide both in terms of efficacy and side effects.     

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

Both erector spinae plane block and wound infiltration are used to improve analgesia following spinal fusion surgery. Herein, we compared the analgesic effect of bilateral erector spinae plane block with wound infiltration in this patient population.

Methods

In this randomized trial, 60 patients scheduled for elective open posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block before incision (n = 30) or wound infiltration at the end of surgery (n = 30). Both groups received standardized general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, including patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil and no background infusion. Opioid consumption and pain intensity were assessed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption within 24 h after surgery.

Results

All 60 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The equivalent dose of sufentanil consumption within 24 h was significantly lower in patients given erector spinae plane block (median 11 μg, interquartile range 5–16) than in those given wound infiltration (20 μg, 10 to 43; median difference − 10 μg, 95% CI − 18 to − 3, P = 0.007). The cumulative number of demanded PCA boluses was significantly lower with erector spinae plane block at 6 h (median difference − 2, 95% CI − 3 to 0, P = 0.006), 12 h (− 3, 95% CI − 6 to − 1, P = 0.002), and 24 h (− 5, 95% CI − 8 to − 2, P = 0.005) postoperatively. The proportion given rescue analgesia was also significantly lower in patients given erector spinae plane block group within 48 h (relative risk 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.96, P = 0.037). There were no statistical differences in pain intensity at any timepoints between groups. No procedure-related adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

Compared with wound infiltration, bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block decreases short-term opioid consumption while providing similar analgesia in patients following lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100053008.

     

The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block,single-injection erector spinae plane block and multiple-injection paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized,double-blinded,clinical trial

Study objectiveThe study was to determine the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and single-injection erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in comparison with multiple-injection paravertebral block (PVB) after thoracoscopic surgery.DesignRandomized, controlled, double- blinded study.SettingOperating room, postoperative recovery room and ward.PatientsSeventy-five patients, aged 18–75 years, ASA I–II and scheduled for elective thoracoscopic partial pulmonary resection surgery were enrolled in the study. Seventy-two patients were left for final analysis.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned into the three groups (PVB group, ICNB group or ESPB group). After anesthesia induction, a single anesthesiologist performed PVB at T5-T7 levels or ICNB at T4-T9 levels or ESPB at T5 level under ultrasound guidance using 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Patients were connected to the patient-controlled morphine analgesia device after surgery.MeasurementsCumulative morphine consumption at 24 h postoperatively as primary outcome was compared. Visual analog scale pain scores at rest and while coughing at 0, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h postoperatively, cumulative morphine consumption at other observed time and rescue analgesia requirement were also recorded.Main resultsThere was a significant difference in median [interquartile range, IQR] morphine consumption at 24 h postoperatively among the three groups (PVB, 10.5 [9–15] mg; ICNB, 18 [13.5–22.1] mg; ESPB, 22 [15–25.1] mg; p = 0.000). This difference was statistically significant for PVB group vs ESPB group (median difference, −7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], −12 to −4.5; p = 0.000) and PVB group vs ICNB group (median difference, −6; 95% CI, −9 to −3; p = 0.001), but not for ICNB vs ESPB (median difference, −3; 95% CI, −6 to 1.5; p = 0.192). PVB group had significantly lower VAS scores at rest and while coughing than ESPB group at 0, 2, 4, 8 h postoperatively and than ICNB group at 8 h postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the VAS scores between ICNB group and ESPB group at all time. Median VAS scores at rest and while coughing at all time were low (<4) in all groups. More rescue analgesia was needed in ESPB group during 48 postoperative hours (PVB vs ICNB vs ESPB; 13% vs 29% vs 46%; p < 0.05).ConclusionsUltrasound-guided multiple-injection PVB provided superior analgesia to ICNB and single-injection ESPB, while ICNB and single-injection ESPB were equally effective in reducing pain after thoracoscopic surgery.     

Perioperative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery—a double blinded,randomized controlled study

Background contentPosterior cervical spine surgery (PCSS) are typically open surgeries and entail significant postoperative pain. Current perioperative pain management in PCSS is reliant on multimodal analgesia. While perioperative epidural anesthetic infusion can be used in lumbar surgeries, this is not an option in the cervical spine. Pre-emptive regional analgesia through erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has shown significant perioperative analgesic benefits in lumbar spine surgeries. There are no such clinical studies in PCSS.PurposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB for perioperative analgesia in PCSS.Study designProspective, randomized controlled, double-blinded study.Patient sampleEighty-six patients requiring sub-axial PCSS with or without instrumentation were randomized into two groups, those who underwent ESPB with multimodal analgesia (case) and those with only multimodal analgesia (control).Outcome measuresDemographic and surgical data (blood loss, duration of surgery, perioperative total opioid consumption, muscle relaxants used) were assessed. Postoperatively, the surgical site pain, alertness scale, satisfaction score, time to mobilization and complications were recorded.MethodsAfter anesthesia and prone position, case patients received ultrasound-guided ESPB at the T1 level using 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 8 mg Dexamethasone bilaterally while the control patients received only standard postoperative multimodal analgesia.ResultsThere were 43 patients in each group; the two groups were identical in demographic and surgical profile. The intraoperative opioid consumption (119.53±40.35 vs. 308.6±189.78; p<.001) in mcg), muscle relaxant usage (50.00±0.00 mg vs. 59.53±3.75 mg, p<.001), surgical duration (124.77±26.63/ 156.74±37.01 min; p<.01) and intraoperative blood loss (310.47±130.73 ml vs. 429.77±148.50 ml; p<.05) were significantly less in the ESPB group. In the postoperative period, the control group's pain score was significantly higher (p<.001). The Modified Observer Alertness/Sedation Score (MOASS) score and satisfaction scores also showed significant differences between the case and control groups (p<.001). The mean time required to ambulate (sitting/walking) was statistically less in cases (15.81±6.15/20.72±4.02 h) when compared to controls (16.86±6.18/ 23.05±8.88 h; p<.001).ConclusionIn patients undergoing PCSS, ESPB is a safe and effective technique with better outcomes than standard multimodal analgesia alone, in terms of reduced intraoperative opioid requirements and blood loss, better postoperative analgesia and early mobilization.     

Is Patient-Specific Instrumentation Accurate and Necessary for Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy? A Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to identify if patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) could increase the accuracy of the correction in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and to explore the assessment indices and the necessity of using a PSI in HTO. A systematic search was carried out using online databases. A total of 466 patients were included in 11 papers that matched the inclusion criteria. To evaluate the accuracy of PSI-assisted HTO, the weight bearing line ratio (WBL%), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively and compared to the designed target values. Statistical analysis was performed after strict data extraction with Review Manager (version 5.4). Significant differences were detected in WBL% (MD = −36.41; 95% CI: −42.30 to −30.53; p < 0.00001), HKA (MD = −9.95; 95% CI: –11.65 to –8.25; p < 0.00001), and mMPTA (MD = –8.40; 95% CI:−10.27 to −6.53; p < 0.00001) but not in PTSA (MD = 0.34; 95% CI: −0.59 to 1.27; p = 0.47) between preoperative and postoperative measurements. There was no significant difference between the designed target values and the postoperative correction values of HKA (MD = 0.14; 95% CI: −0.19 to 0.47; p = 0.41) or mMPTA (MD = 0.11; 95% CI −0.34 to 0.55; p = 0.64). The data show that 3D-based planning of PSI for HTO is both accurate and safe. WBL%, HKA, and mMPTA were the optimal evaluation indicators of coronal plane correction. Sagittal correction is best evaluated by the PTSA. The present study reports that PSI is accurate but not necessary in typical HTO.     

Perioperative Systemic Dexamethasone Reduces Length of Stay in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundThe objective of this review is to examine the effect of perioperative systemic corticosteroids at varying doses and timings on early postoperative recovery outcomes following unilateral total knee and total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 1, 2020. Studies comparing the outcome of adult patients receiving a systemic steroid to patients who did not receive steroids were included.ResultsSeventeen studies were included, incorporating 1957 patients. Perioperative corticosteroids reduced hospital LOS (mean difference [MD] = ?0.39 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] ?0.61 to ?0.18). A subsequent dose of corticosteroid at 24 hours further reduced LOS (MD = ?0.33, 95% CI ?0.55 to ?0.11). Corticosteroids resulted in reduced levels of pain on postoperative day (POD) 0 (MD = ?1.99, 95% CI ?3.30 to ?0.69), POD1 (MD = ?1.47, 95% CI ?2.15 to ?0.79), and POD2. Higher doses were more effective in reducing pain with activity on POD0 (P = .006) and 1 (P = .023). Steroids reduced the incidence of PONV on POD1 (log odds ratio [OR] = ?1.05, 95% CI ?1.26 to ?0.84) and POD2, with greater effect at higher doses (P = .046). Corticosteroids did not increase the incidence of infection (P = 1.000), venous thromboembolism (P = 1.000), or gastrointestinal hemorrhage (P = 1.000) but were associated with an increase in blood glucose (MD = 5.30 mg/dL, 95% CI 2.69-7.90).ConclusionPerioperative corticosteroids are safe, facilitate earlier discharge, and improve patient recovery following unilateral total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Higher doses (15-20 mg of dexamethasone) are associated with further reductions in dynamic pain and PONV, and repeat dosing may further reduce LOS.     

Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study

Objective:This study aimed to compare the effect of the ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain scores, opioid requirement, patient satisfaction, and the length of hospital stay with standard analgesia methods following scoliosis surgery.Methods:Twenty-seven patients (17 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.59 ± 3.24 years) who underwent scoliosis surgery with preoperative bilateral bilevel US-guided ESPB were the sample group, and the remaining 30 patients (20 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.57 ± 2.75 years) without ESPB were the control group. Bilateral bilevel injection ESPB was performed at two levels (T4 and T10). Postoperative pain scores, morphine consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were recorded. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to score postoperative pain.Results:VAS at rest and when mobile, as well as postoperative cumulative morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24 h, was significantly lower in the ESPB group. Thirteen patients in the control group but no in the ESPB group required rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Both the time to the requirement of the initial dose of PCA and patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the ESPB group (P < 0.001 for both).Conclusion:Given the need for improved recovery of the patients, ESPB seems to be an essential analgesic technique that may reduce both opioid consumption and the severity of the pain, thus increasing the satisfaction of the patients and decreasing the length of hospital stay.Level of Evidence:Level IV, Therapeutic Study     

Is gabapentin effective and safe in open hysterectomy? A PRISMA compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundPain management after open hysterectomy has been investigated for years. Owing to the effect of significant analgesic, gabapentin was often administrated for pre-emptive analgesia. However, the relationship between gabapentin and postoperative pain after open hysterectomy is still controversial. This meta-analysis was applied to assess the efficacy of pre-emptive use of gabapentin in open hysterectomy.MethodsThis meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the use of gabapentin with placebo in open hysterectomy regarding (1) the mean difference (MD) of postoperative opioid requirements; (2) the changes of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in two groups; and (3) incidence rate of adverse effects. Systematic searches of all related literatures was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for open hysterectomy were included. The MD of postoperative opioid requirements and VAS scores, relative risk (RR) of incidence rate of adverse effects in the gabapentin group versus placebo group were extracted throughout the study.ResultsFourteen trials were included in this meta-analysis. The total opioid consumption at 24 h was a less in gabapentin group. (MD = − 11.61, 95% CI: − 16.71 to − 6.51, P = 0.00) The visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 4, 12 and 24 h were less in the gabapentin group. (MD = − 16.83, 95% CI: − 22.88 to − 10.77, P = 0.00), (MD = − 17.45, 95% CI: − 21.83 to − 13.08, P = 0.00), (MD = − 9.83, 95% CI: − 13.31 to − 6.35, P = 0.00) The incidence rate of vomiting and nausea were significantly less in gabapentin groups. (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.73, P = 0.00), (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.93, P = 0.02). Compared with placebo, gabapentin achieved higher patient satisfaction. (MD = 20.43, 95% CI: 12.42 to 28.44, P < 0.00).ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that the employment of gabapentin was efficacious in reduction of postoperative opioid consumption, VAS score and some side effects after open hysterectomy.     

Analgesic efficacy of the Pecs II block: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgery is the primary therapeutic intervention for breast cancer and can result in significant postoperative pain. We searched the current literature and performed a meta-analysis in order to compare the analgesic efficacy of the pectoral type-2 (Pecs II) block with systemic analgesia alone and with a thoracic paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery. Primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 24 h after surgery, intra-operative opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We identified 13 randomised controlled trials that included 815 patients. The Pecs II block significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption (standardised difference in means: −13.64 mg oral morphine equivalents; 95%CI: −21.22 to −6.05; p < 0.01) and acute postoperative pain at all intervals in the first 24 h after surgery compared with systemic analgesia alone. Compared with the thoracic paravertebral block, the Pecs II block resulted in similar postoperative opioid consumption (standardised difference in means: −8.73 mg oral morphine equivalents; 95%CI: −18.16 to 0.69; p = 0.07) and postoperative pain scores after first measurement. In conclusion, the Pecs II block offers improved analgesic efficacy compared with systemic analgesia alone and comparable analgesic efficacy to a thoracic paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery.     

The effect of tranexamic acid on the values of activated clotting time in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objectiveActivated clotting time (ACT) is a non-specific test to evaluate the adequacy of systemic heparinization whose value could be influenced by many factors. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a widely used antifibrinolytic agent worldwide and whether TXA influences ACT value in cardiac surgical patients remains unknown. Current study was performed to address this question.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. PUBMED, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, OVID and Chinese BioMedical Literature & Retrieval System were searched using search terms “tranexamic acid”, “activated clotting time”, “cardiac surgery”, “randomized controlled trial” till May 7th, 2020, to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).SettingOperating room.PatientsCardiac surgical patients.InterventionsTXA or placebo.MeasurementsPrimary outcomes of interest included peri-operative ACT values. Secondary outcomes of interest include heparin dosage, protamine dosage, postoperative bleeding and blood transfusion.Main resultsSearch yielded 13 studies including 1168 patients, and 619 patients were allocated into Group TXA and 549 into Group Control (placebo). Meta-analysis suggested that, ACT values after heparinization [(WMD = −1.45; 95%CI: −12.52 to 15.43; P = 0.84)] and after protamine [(WMD = −1.18; 95%CI: −2.81 to 0.46; P = 0.16)] were comparable between Group TXA and Group Control, and that TXA did not influence heparin dose in adult patients [(WMD = 0.38; 95%CI: 0.30 to 0.46; P<0.00001) with no heterogeneity (I² = 4%, P = 0.35)] and protamine dose for heparin reversal [(WMD = 5.23; 95%CI: −0.33 to 10.80; P = 0.07) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0, P = 0.58)]. Meta-analysis also demonstrated that, TXA administration significantly reduced post-operative bleeding volume [(WMD = −126.33; 95%CI: −177.46 to −75.19; P < 0.0001), post-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume [(WMD = −71.86; 95% CI: −88.22 to −55.50; P < 0.00001), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion volume [(WMD = −13.83; 95% CI: −23.67 to −4.00; P = 0.006) and platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion volume [(WMD = −0.20; 95% CI: −0.29 to −0.10; P < 0.0001).ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that, TXA administration did not influence ACT value, heparin and protamine doses, but significantly reduced post-operative blood loss and transfusion requirement in cardiac surgical patients.     

Application of controlled low central venous pressure during hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objectivePrevious studies reported that controlled low central venous pressure (CVP) can reduce blood loss during liver resection. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to explore the efficacy and safety of low CVP in patients undergoing hepatectomy.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Review methodsRCTs were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese BioMedical database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, and Wanfang database from inception to April 30, 2021. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different surgical methods (open hepatectomy vs laparoscopic hepatectomy) and published countries (China vs other countries). The quality of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.Main resultsEighteen RCTs containing 1285 participants (626 patients in the low CVP group and 659 patients in the control group) were included in this study. The forest plot showed that low CVP effectively reduced blood loss during liver resection compared with the control group (MD = −311.92 mL, 95% CI [−429.03, −194.81]; P < 0.001, I² = 96%). Furthermore, blood transfusion volume (MD = −158.85 mL, 95% CI [−218.30, −99.40]; P < 0.001, I² = 55%) and the number of patients requiring transfusion (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27–0.65, P < 0.001, I² = 0%) were decreased in the low CVP group. Subgroup analyses showed similar results. Notably, the alanine transaminase level was significantly lower in the low CVP group during the first five postoperative days. However, no significant differences were observed for other postoperative liver function indicators (aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, serum albumin, and prothrombin time), renal function indicators (blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine) and perfusion parameters (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and urine volume). The incidence of complications was similar between the two groups.ConclusionThe findings of this study showed that low CVP is effective and safe during hepatectomy. Therefore, this technique is recommended to reduce blood loss during hepatectomy.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021232829.     

Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for analgesia in breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The erector spinae plane block is a new regional anaesthesia technique that provides truncal anaesthesia for breast surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to determine if the erector spinae plane block is effective at reducing pain scores and opioid consumption after breast surgery. This study also evaluated the outcomes of erector spinae plane blocks compared with other regional blocks. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. We included randomised controlled trials reporting the use of the erector spinae plane block in adult breast surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess trial quality. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (861 patients; 418 erector spinae plane block, 215 no blocks, 228 other blocks) were included. Erector spinae plane block reduced postoperative pain compared with no block: at 0-2 hours (mean difference (95% CI) −1.63 (−2.97 to −0.29), 6 studies, 329 patients, high-quality evidence, I² = 98%, p = 0.02); at 6 hours (mean difference (95% CI) −0.90 (−1.49 to −0.30), 5 studies, 250 patients, high-quality evidence, I² = 91%, p = 0.003); at 12 hours (mean difference (95% CI) −0.46 (−0.67 to −0.25), 5 studies, 250 patients, high-quality evidence, I² = 58%, p < 0.0001); and at 24 hours (mean difference (95% CI) −0.50 (−0.70 to −0.30), 6 studies, 329 patients, high-quality evidence, I² = 76%, p < 0.00001). Compared with no block, erector spinae plane block also showed significantly lower postoperative oral morphine equivalent requirements (mean difference (95% CI) −21.55mg (−32.57 to −10.52), 7 studies, 429 patients, high-quality evidence, I² = 99%, p = 0.0001). Separate analysis of studies comparing erector spinae plane block with pectoralis nerve block and paravertebral block showed that its analgesic efficacy was inferior to pectoralis nerve block and similar to paravertebral block. The incidence of pneumothorax was 2.6% in the paravertebral block group; there were no reports of complications of the other blocks. This review has shown that the erector spinae plane block is more effective at reducing postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores up to 24 hours compared with general anaesthesia alone. However, it was inferior to the pectoralis nerve block and its efficacy was similar to paravertebral block. Further evidence, preferably from properly blinded trials, is required to confirm these findings.