Enhanced recovery after elective craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectivesEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been proven to improve outcomes but have not been widely used in neurosurgery. The purpose of this study was to design a multidisciplinary enhanced recovery after elective craniotomy protocol and to evaluate its clinical efficacy and safety after implementation.DesignA prospective randomized controlled trial.SettingThe setting is at an operating room, a post-anesthesia care unit, and a hospital ward.PatientsThis randomized controlled trial (RCT) prospectively analyzed 151 patients who underwent elective craniotomy between January 2019 and June 2020.InterventionsThe neurosurgical ERAS group was cared for with evidence-based systematic optimization approaches, while the control group received routine care.MeasurementsThe primary outcomes were the postoperative length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs. The secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, postoperative complications, postoperative pain scores, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of the drainage tube, time to oral intake, time to ambulation, and postoperative functional recovery status.Main resultsAfter ERAS protocol implementation, the median postoperative LOS (4 days to 3 days, difference [95% confidence interval, CI], 2 [[1], [2]], P < 0.0001) and hospitalization costs (6266 USD to 5880 USD, difference [95% CI], 427.0 [234.8 to 633.6], P < 0.0001) decreased. Compared to routine perioperative care, the ERAS protocol reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (28.0% to 9.2%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.7, P = 0.003), shortened urinary catheter removal time by 24 h (64.0% to 83.0%, adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3–6.5, P = 0.031), improved ambulation on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) (30.7% to 75.0%, adjusted OR 7.5, 95% CI 3.6–15.8, P < 0.0001), shortened the time to oral intake (15 h to 13 h, difference [95% CI], 3 [[1], [2], [3], [4]], P < 0.001), and improved perioperative pain management.ConclusionsImplementation of an enhanced recovery after elective craniotomy protocol had significant benefits over conventional perioperative management. It was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative length of stay, medical cost, and postoperative complications.     

Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

ObjectiveEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely implemented after minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current evidence available on ERAS after MIS in children.MethodsUsing a defined search strategy (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus), we performed a systematic review of the literature, searching for studies reporting on ERAS after MIS (thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, retroperitoneoscopy) in children (1975–2019). This study was registered with PROSPERO-international prospective register of systematic reviews. A meta-analysis was conducted using comparative studies for length of stay (LOS), complication rates, and readmission rates.ResultsOf 180 abstracts screened, 20 full-text articles were analyzed, and 9 were included in our systematic review (1 randomized controlled trial, 3 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies), involving a total number of 531 patients. ERAS has been applied to laparoscopy for digestive (n = 7 studies) or urologic surgeries (n = 1), as well as thoracoscopy (n = 1). Mean LOS was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, −1.12 days, 95%IC: −1.5 to −0.82, p < 0.00001). There was no difference in complication rates between ERAS children and control children (5 studies, 13% vs 14%, OR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.49–1.44, p = 0.52). The 30-day readmission rate was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, 4% vs 10%, OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.18–0.66, p = 0.001).ConclusionsAlthough the evidence regarding ERAS in MIS is scarce, these protocols seem safe and effective, by decreasing LOS and 30-day readmission rate, without increasing post-operative complication rates.     

The robotic approach improves the outcomes of ERAS protocol after radical cystectomy: A prospective case-control analysis

BackgroundMinimally-invasive approach is one of the mainstays of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) introduction has reduced the surgical burden on patient's recovery. Accordingly, ERAS protocol benefits may be more striking in RARC patients. We evaluated the impact of surgical approach on perioperative outcomes, Fast Track (FT) recovery steps and Trifecta success rates in patients undergoing RC followed by FT protocol.Materials and methodsWe considered 147 patients who underwent RC, with open (Open radical cystectomy [ORC]; 47.6%) or robotic (RARC; 52.4%) approach at 2 tertiary centers. Urinary diversions were ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder. All patients underwent FT protocol. We analyzed perioperative surgical and functional outcomes and Trifecta success rates (namely, defecation <5 days, in-hospital stay <10 days and no major complications). Uni and multivariable logistic regression explored the predictors for Trifecta success and the impact of surgical approach on recovery steps.ResultsPatients undergoing RARC had higher FT adherence (95% vs. 61%) compared to ORCs (P < 0.01). Trifecta success rates were higher for RARC (79.2% vs 28.6%; P < 0.001). At multivariable analyses, RARC was an independent predictor for Trifecta success (OR 9.1), early mobilization (OR 5.9) and FT adherence (OR 3.33; all P < 0.001). Surgical technique was not associated with major complications or readmission within 90 days (all P > 0.05).ConclusionRARC has more favorable perioperative outcomes compared to ORC, with higher Trifecta success rates. Accordingly, robotic approach should be ideally included in every center where ERAS protocol is applied to RC for maximizing patient's recovery.     

Institutional factors associated with adherence to enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery: Secondary analysis of a multicenter study

IntroductionAdherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) is associated with faster functional recovery, better patient satisfaction, lower complication rates and reduced length of hospital stay. Understanding institutional barriers and facilitators is essential for improving adherence to ERPs. The purpose of this study was to identify institutional factors associated with adherence to an ERP for colorectal surgery.MethodsA secondary analysis of a nationwide study was conducted including 686 patients who underwent colorectal surgery across twenty-one institutions in Spain. Adherence to ERPs was calculated based upon the components recommended by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society. Institutional characteristics (i.e., case volume, ERP duration, anesthesia staff size, multidisciplinary meetings, leadership discipline) were captured from each participating program. Multivariable regression was performed to determine characteristics associated with adherence.ResultsThe median adherence to ERAS was 68.2% (IQR 59.1%–81.8%). Multivariable linear regression revealed that anesthesiologist leadership (+5.49%, 95%CI +2.81% to +8.18%, P < 0.01), duration of ERAS implementation (+0.46% per year, 95%CI +0.06% to +0.86%, P < 0.01) and the use of regular multidisciplinary meetings (+4.66%, 95%CI +0.06 to +7.74%, P < 0.01) were independently associated with greater adherence. Case volume (−2.38% per 4 cases weekly, 95%CI -3.03 to −1.74, P < 0.01) and number of anesthesia providers (−1.19% per 10 providers, 95%CI +2.23 to −8.18%, P < 0.01) were negatively associated with adherence.ConclusionAdherence to ERPs is strongly associated with anesthesiology leadership, regular multidisciplinary meetings, and program duration, whereas case volume and the size of the anesthesia staff were potential barriers. These findings highlight the importance of strong leadership, experience and establishing a multidisciplinary team when developing an ERP for colorectal surgery.     

Lung protective ventilation strategy to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A randomized double blinded clinical trial

Study objectiveTo evaluate the effects of ventilation with low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer.DesignA prospective randomized double-blinded study.SettingA single center trial in a comprehensive tertiary hospital from January 2017 to January 2019.PatientsA total of 258 patients undergoing RARC for bladder cancer.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to receive either lung-protective ventilation (LPV group) [tidal volume 6 ml/ kg predicated body weight (PBW) + PEEP 7 cmH₂O] or nonprotective ventilation (control group) (tidal volume 9 ml/ kg PBW without PEEP) during anesthesia.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) during the first 90 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were extubation time, oxygenation index (OI) after extubation and at postoperative day 1 in blood gas.Main resultsThe incidence of PPCs at postoperative day1, 2 and 3 were lower in LPV group [26.8% vs. 47.2%, odds ratio (OR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.24–0.69, P = 0.0007, 21.3% vs. 43.3%, OR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.20–0.61, P = 0.0002, 14.2% vs. 27.5%, OR0.43, 95%CI, 0.23–0.82, P = 0.0087, respectively], while no differences were observed at day 7 and 28 (3.9% vs. 9.4%, P = 0.0788, 0% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.4980, respectively). No PPCs were observed at postoperative day 90 in both groups. Furthermore, immediately after extubating and at postoperative day 1, OI was significantly higher in LPV group compared with control group [390(337–467) vs. 343(303–420), P = 0.0005, 406.7(73.0) vs. 425.5(74.7), P = 0.0440, respectively]. Patients in LPV group had a significant shorter extubation time after operation compared with control group [38(33–54) vs. 35(25–46), P = 0.0012].ConclusionLPV combining low tidal volume and PEEP during anesthesia for RARC may decrease the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.     

Postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients with preoperative cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objectiveTo determine the effect of cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia on adverse outcomes in older surgical patients.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Various databases were searched from their inception dates to March 8, 2021.SettingPreoperative assessment.PatientsOlder patients (≥ 60 years) undergoing non-cardiac surgery.MeasurementsOutcomes included postoperative delirium, mortality, discharge to assisted care, 30-day readmissions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Effect sizes were calculated as Odds Ratio (OR) and Mean Difference (MD) based on random effect model analysis. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk Bias Tool for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational cohort studies.ResultsFifty-three studies (196,491 patients) were included. Preoperative CI was associated with a significant risk of delirium in older patients after non-cardiac surgery (25.1% vs. 10.3%; OR: 3.84; 95%CI: 2.35, 6.26; I²: 76%; p < 0.00001). Cognitive impairment (26.2% vs. 13.2%; OR: 2.28; 95%CI: 1.39, 3.74; I²: 73%; p = 0.001) and dementia (41.6% vs. 25.5%; OR: 1.96; 95%CI: 1.34, 2.88; I²: 99%; p = 0.0006) significantly increased risk for 1-year mortality. In patients with CI, there was an increased risk of discharge to assisted care (44.7% vs. 38.3%; OR 1.74; 95%CI: 1.05, 2.89, p = 0.03), 30-day readmissions (14.3% vs. 10.8%; OR: 1.36; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.84, p = 0.05), and postoperative complications (40.7% vs. 18.8%; OR: 1.85; 95%CI: 1.37, 2.49; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsPreoperative CI in older surgical patients significantly increases risk of delirium, 1-year mortality, discharge to assisted care, 30-day readmission, and postoperative complications. Dementia increases the risk of 1-year mortality. Cognitive screening in the preoperative assessment for older surgical patients may be helpful for risk stratification so that appropriate management can be implemented to mitigate adverse postoperative outcomes.     

The effects of paravertebral blockade usage on pulmonary complications,atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery

Study objectiveAlthough combined thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB)-general anesthesia (GA) could improve pain control compared to GA alone after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, it has not been established whether this improvement in pain control could reduce associated adverse outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to explore the association between TPVB usage and adverse outcomes after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.DesignRetrospective cohort study from a prospective database.SettingA high-volume thoracic center in China.Patients13966 consecutive patients who received thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2018 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were enrolled.MeasurementsWith a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, adverse outcomes between GA alone and GA-TPVB were investigated. Multivariate and multiple linear regression analysis were used to identify factors and calculate odds radio (OR) for adverse outcomes.ResultsThe rate of TPVB usage was 14.8% (2070 out of 13,966). TPVB combined with GA was associated with lower rates of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (30.4% vs 33.5%, P = 0.005) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (2.1% vs 2.9%, P = 0.041), and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (Median [IQR]; 5[4-5] vs 5[4-6]) days, P < 0.001) compared to GA alone. After a 1:1 PSM analysis, we investigated adverse outcomes in 2640 (1320 pairs) patients with or without TPVB usage, and this association remained existed, namely, the rates of PPCs (29.8% vs 34.2%, P = 0.014) and POAF (2.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.028) were lower and LOS was shorter (5[4-5] vs 5[4-6] days, P < 0.001) in the GA-TPVB group. In multivariate analysis, the combination of GA plus TPVB was independent predictor for PPCs (OR = 0.879, 95%CI, 0.793–0.974, P = 0.014) and POAF (OR = 0.714, 95%CI, 0.516–0.988, P = 0.042), respectively. However, in multiple linear analysis, lower rates of PPCs and POAF associated with TPVB usage, rather than TPVB usage, were responsible for the reduced LOS.ConclusionsThe usage of TPVB may be a feasible and adjustable approach to reduce the rates of PPCs and POAF and associated LOS in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.     

Intraoperative opioid and analgesic adjuvant administration practice patterns following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Study objectiveThe primary aim of this study is to understand how intraoperative medication administration patterns change in response to ERAS® protocol implementation for patients who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.DesignSingle-center, retrospective analysis of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy patients.SettingLarge tertiary academic medical center.PatientsWe divided all cases of laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (n = 929) over seven years into three approximately equal time periods: Pre-ERAS 1 (n = 317), Pre-ERAS 2 (n = 297) and Post-ERAS (n = 315).MeasurementsWe examined patient demographics, intraoperative opioid and non-opioid pain adjuvant administration, Post Anesthesia Recovery Unit (PACU) pain scores and opioid use as well as PACU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS).Main resultsSegmented regression analysis of interrupted time series was utilized to evaluate the association of ERAS protocol implementation with the amount of intraoperative opioid and non-opioid pain adjuvant use. In adherence to our institutional ERAS protocol, there was a significant reduction in intraoperative fentanyl use after ERAS protocol of −70.2μg (95% CI -106.0, −34.2, p < 0.001) and a significant increase in intraoperative hydromorphone use of 0.47 mg (95% CI 0.284, 0.655, p < 0.001). However, in contrary to our ERAS protocol, we found no significant change in odds of receiving IV acetaminophen OR 1.31 (95% CI 0.450, 3.76, p = 0.613) or IV ketorolac OR 1.65 (95% CI 0.804, 3.41, p = 0.172) after ERAS protocol implementation. We found a significant reduction in PACU opioid use of −9.68 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) (95% CI -17.1, −2.31, p = 0.010) but no significant change in PACU initial pain score, PACU LOS and hospital LOS.ConclusionsWe examined intraoperative practice pattern changes by anesthesiologists in response to ERAS protocol implementation for laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. Our results suggest that there was a variable uptake of recommendations from ERAS protocol. While ERAS protocols are often studied as a bundle of best practice recommendations, understanding the variability of provider adherence represents an important future research direction for the ERAS initiative.     

An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in pediatric colorectal surgery improves patient outcomes

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in adult colorectal surgery are known to reduce complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). However, there is a paucity of ERAS data for pediatric colorectal surgery.MethodsA 2014–2018 single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric colorectal surgery patients (2–18 years) pre- and post-ERAS pathway implementation. Bivariate analysis and linear regression were used to determine if ERAS pathway implementation reduced total morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram (MME/kg), LOS, and time to oral intake.Results98 (70.5%) and 41 (29.5%) patients were managed with ERAS and non-ERAS pathways, respectively. There was no statistical difference in age, sex, diagnosis, or use of laparoscopic technique between cohorts. The ERAS cohort experienced a significant reduction in total MME/kg, Foley duration, time to oral intake, and LOS with no increase in complications. The presence of an ERAS pathway reduced the total MME/kg (? 0.071, 95% CI ? 0.10, ? 0.043) when controlling for covariates.ConclusionThe use of an ERAS pathway reduces opioid utilization, which is associated with a reduction in LOS and expedites the initiation of oral intake, in colorectal pediatric surgery patients. Pediatric ERAS pathways should be incorporated into the care of pediatric patients undergoing colorectal surgery.Level of evidenceLevel III evidence.Type of studyRetrospective cohort study.     

Prior bariatric surgery is associated with lower complications,in-hospital mortality,and healthcare utilization after elective spine fusion surgery

BackgroundGrade 3 obesity could potentially increase postoperative complications after spinal fusion surgery. However, the relationship between prior bariatric surgery (BS) and postoperative complications after spinal fusion surgery is not well-established.SettingInpatient hospital admissions from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.MethodsPatients with a primary procedure of spinal fusion surgery discharged between 2006 and 2014 were identified. In-hospital outcomes included postoperative complications, mortality, cost, and length of stay were compared between patients with prior BS and grade 3 obesity.ResultsA total of 3,132,192 patients who underwent elective spinal fusion surgery were identified. There were 33,936 (1.1%) patients with a diagnosis of prior BS. The prevalence of prior BS increased significantly from .1% in 2006 to 1.5% in 2014. Compared with patients with grade 3 obesity, patients with prior BS were younger, more likely to be female, had less co-morbidities, and higher proportion of cervical surgery. Multivariable analysis indicated that patients with prior BS had lower risk of overall complications (odds ratio [OR]: .44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .38–.49), neurologic (OR: .55; 95%CI: .35–.84), respiratory (OR: .30; 95%CI: .23–.37), cardiac (OR: .38; 95%CI: .24–.60), gastrointestinal (OR: .61; 95%CI: .44–.84), urinary and renal (OR: .34; 95%CI: .26–.44), venous thromboembolism (OR: .35; 95%CI: .19–.63), wound-related complications (OR: .67; 95%CI: .53–.85), and in-hospital mortality (OR: .12; 95%CI: .02–.88). Prior BS was also related to 13% shorter length of stay and 2% lower cost.ConclusionsAmong patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, prior BS is associated with lower complications, in-hospital mortality, and healthcare utilization. BS might mitigate risk of worse outcomes associated with grade 3 obesity after spine fusion surgery.     

Enhanced recovery after surgery for sleeve gastrectomies: improved patient outcomes

BackgroundEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a paradigm shift in perioperative care and incorporates patient-centered, evidence-based, and multidisciplinary team–developed pathways for a surgical specialty. ERAS pathways aim to reduce the patient’s surgical stress response, optimize their physiologic function, facilitate recovery, and reduce the length of stay. The bariatric program at our institution was previously managed by many surgeons with anecdotal preferences, resulting in increased costs, lengths of stay, and opioid prescribing.ObjectivesTo describe a standardized ERAS pathway for patients undergoing a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy procedure in order to enhance perioperative care and reduce opioid usage.SettingERAS bariatric program in New Jersey.MethodsThe ERAS bariatric program at our institution was implemented in January 2018. All patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy from January 2016 to November 2017 (preimplementation) as well as from February 2018 to October 2020 (postimplementation) were included in this retrospective study, with those undergoing procedures in December 2017 and January 2018 excluded due to the transition to the ERAS protocol. Differences in lengths of stay, direct costs, and 30-day readmission rates were compared between the pre- and postimplementation periods. The primary goal of our ERAS pathway was to optimize patient care with reduced opioid usage, and the secondary goal was to reduce the costs for care.ResultsA total of 1988 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were identified, with 789 patients in the preimplementation group and 1199 patients in the postimplementation group. In a multivariate analysis, the mean length of a hospital stay in the postimplementation period was 18% lower (95% confidence interval [CI], 14–22) than that of the preimplementation period (P < .001), while the average opioid morphine milligram equivalents administered in the postoperative period was 61% (95% CI, 57%–65%) less than that of the preimplementation period (P < .001). Average direct costs decreased by $155 (95% CI, −$358 to $48) per case in the postimplementation period (P = .133), and there was no significant difference in the 30-day readmission rate between the pre- and postimplementation periods (3.8% versus 3.0%, respectively; odds ratio, .81; 95% CI, .49–1.35; P = .413).ConclusionIn this study, patient outcomes after ERAS pathway implementation were significantly better than in historical cases. Implementing the bariatric ERAS program for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at our institution has led to rapid postoperative recovery of patients, shorter lengths of stay, reduced opioid usage, and decreased costs per case, thereby increasing the overall cost savings to the hospital. ERAS pathways in bariatric surgery represent an opportunity to enhance patient care while decreasing overall costs. We propose that cost-effective, tailor-made ERAS pathways for sleeve gastrectomy should be implemented in all designated centers of excellence, as they can have a great economic impact on the healthcare system.     

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for elderly gastric cancer patients: A prospective study for safety and efficacy

BackgroundEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been used to improve surgical outcomes in recent years. However, its safety and efficacy in elderly patients with gastric cancer remain unclear. The aim of this study was to reveal the safety and efficacy of the ERAS protocol in elderly patients with gastric cancer.MethodsElderly gastric cancer patients (age≥70 years) who underwent gastrectomy were divided into the ERAS group and the conventional group. Postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and readmission rates were compared between the two groups.ResultsFrom December 2019 to January 2021, 100 eligible patients were enrolled in our study. All baseline data were balanced between the ERAS group and the conventional group. There was no significant difference in terms of complications (18% vs. 16%, P = 0.14) between the two groups. The most common complication was pneumonia. Four patients were observed in the conventional group and three patients in the ERAS group. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the ERAS group (8.2 vs. 10.4, P = 0.001).ConclusionsThe ERAS protocol could be safely used in elderly gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy and shorten postoperative hospital stay.     

Resección transuretral en bloque vs. resección transuretral convencional para el cáncer de vejiga primario no músculo-infiltrante: metaanálisis

IntroductionWe performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of en-bloc transurethral resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.MethodsA systematic literature search up to January 2022 was done and 28 studies included 3714 primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer subjects at the start of the study; 1870 of them were en-bloc transurethral resection, and 1844 were conventional transurethral resection for primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. We calculated the odds-ratio (OR) and mean-difference (MD) with 95% confidence-intervals (CIs) to evaluate the effect of en-bloc transurethral resection compared with conventional transurethral resection for primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer by the dichotomous or continuous methods with random or fixed-effects models.ResultsEn-bloc transurethral resection had significantly lower twenty-four-month recurrence (OR: 0.63; 95%CI: 0.50-0.78; P < 0.001), catheterization-time (MD: –0.66; 95%CI: –1.02-[–0.29]; P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (MD: –0.95; 95%CI: –1.55-[–0.34]; P = 0.002), postoperative bladder irrigation duration (MD: –6.06; 95%CI: –9.45-[–2.67]; P < 0.001), obturator nerve reflex (OR: 0.08; 95%CI: 0.02-0.34; P = 0.03), and bladder perforation (OR: 0.14; 95%CI: 0.06-0.36: P < 0.001) and no significant difference in the 12-month-recurrence (OR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.61-1.04; P = 0.09), the operation time (MD: 0.67; 95%CI: –1.92-3.25; P = 0.61), and urethral stricture (OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.14-1.47; P = 0.19) compared with conventional transurethral resection for primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer subjects.ConclusionsEn-bloc transurethral resection had a significantly lower twenty-four-month recurrence, catheterization time, length of hospital stay, postoperative bladder irrigation duration, obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, and no significant difference in the twelve-month recurrence, operation time, and urethral stricture compared with conventional transurethral resection for primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer subjects. Further studies are required.     

Enhanced recovery after surgery care to reduce surgical site wound infection and postoperative complications for patients undergoing liver surgery

This study comprehensively assessed the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on wound infection and postoperative complications in patients undergoing liver surgery. The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang electronic databases were searched to collect published studies on the use of ERAS in liver surgery until December 2022. Literature selection was performed independently by two investigators according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality evaluation and data extraction were performed. RevMan 5.4 software was used in this study. Compared with the control group, the ERAS group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative wound infection (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–0.84, P = .004) and overall postoperative complication rate (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33–0.57, P < .001) and significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean difference: −2.30, 95% CI: −2.92 to −1.68, P < .001). Therefore, ERAS was safe and feasible when applied to liver resection, reducing the incidence of wound infection and total postoperative complications, and shortening the length of hospital stay. However, further studies are required to investigate the impact of ERAS protocols on clinical outcomes.     

Incidence and predictors of sternal surgical wound infection in cardiac surgery: A prospective study

Sternal surgical wound infection (SSWI) in cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity. We investigated the incidence of SSWI, the main germs implicated and predictors of SSWI. Prospective study including patients undergoing full median sternotomy between January 2017 and December 2019. Patients were followed-up for 3 months after hospital discharge. All sternal wound infections up to 90 days after discharge were considered SSWI. 1004 patients were included. During follow-up, 68 (6.8%) patients presented SSWI. Patients with SSWI had a higher incidence of postoperative renal failure (29.4% vs 17.1%, P = .007), a higher incidence of early postoperative reoperation for non-infectious causes (42.6% vs 9.1%, P < .001), longer ICU stay (3 [2–9] days vs 2 [2–4] days, P = .006), and longer hospital stay (24.5 [14.8–38.3] days vs 10 [7–18] days, P < .001). Gram-positive germs were presented in 49% of the cultures, and gram-negative bacteria in 35%. Early reoperation for non-infectious causes (OR 4.90, 95% CI 1.03–23.7), and a longer ICU stay (OR 1.37 95% CI 1.10–1.72) were independent predictors of SSWI. SSWI is rare but leads to more postoperative complications. The need for early reoperation because of non-infectious cause and a longer ICU stay were independently associated with SSWI.     

Chronic kidney disease and radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes in 1,214 patients

Introduction and ObjectiveTo assess the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on outcomes after radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with bladder cancer treated within a high-volume tertiary referral center.MethodsWe identified 1,214 patients who underwent RC with intent to cure from 2009 to 2019. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) GFR (ml/min/1.73 m²) was calculated and patients were categorized by baseline GFR: Group A = GFR > 60, Group B = GFR > 30–59 and Group C = GFR < 30. Pre-, intra- and postoperative characteristics, oncological outcomes, and 90-day perioperative outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables.ResultsWe identified 722 (59.5%) patients in Group A, 448 (36.9%) in Group B, and 44 (3.6%) in Group C. Patients with worse CKD were older and had significantly worse overall comorbidity (all P < 0.001). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used in 352 patients (29%), including 182 (25.2%) in Group A, 153 in Group B (35.3%), and 12 in Group C (27.3%). On univariate analysis, worse CKD was associated with higher pathologic stage, lymph node metastases and positive soft tissue margins (all P < 0.0001). The rates of blood transfusion, 90-day complications and readmissions were higher in patients with worse CKD (P < 0.0001, P = 0.02, P = 0.04, respectively). Patients with worse CKD had worse overall survival (77% vs. 73% vs. 55%, P < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, worse CKD was independently associated with adverse pathology (≥pT3 or node positive) (OR = 6.96, 95%CI 3.20–15.12), 90-day readmissions (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.11–3.94) and perioperative transfusion (OR 2.08, 95%CI 1.05–4.11). Receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a decreased risk of adverse pathology (OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36–0.74) and increased risk of transfusion (OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.70–2.96), but not with mortality, complications, readmissions or length or stay.ConclusionCKD is prevalent in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. We found CKD to be independently associated with a higher likelihood of adverse pathology, 90-day readmissions, and transfusion.     

Impact of a continuous enhanced cardio-respiratory monitoring pathway on cardio-respiratory complications after bariatric surgery: A retrospective cohort study

Study objectiveTo determine the impact of an enhanced monitoring pathway consisting of continuous postoperative cardio-respiratory monitoring on adverse outcomes after bariatric.DesignSingle-center, retrospective cohort study.PatientsAdult patients who underwent bariatric surgeries between 2009 and 2016.InterventionsWe evaluated the use of an enhanced monitoring pathway consisting of a distant, continuous, non-invasive respiratory monitoring system on postoperative cardio-respiratory complications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Treating physicians had the option to assign patients to enhanced monitoring (intervention group) in the postoperative period for suspected or diagnosed OSA or other clinical concerns. The control group had intermittent vital sign checks as per institutional standards.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was a composite of cardio-respiratory complications (rapid response team activation, intensive care admission, respiratory complications), major adverse cardiac events, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was length of stay (LOS).Main resultsOf 1450 patients, 752 patients received enhanced monitoring (intervention) and 698 patients received standard monitoring (control). Univariate analysis showed that, compared to control, enhanced monitoring was associated with lower odds of composite cardio-respiratory complications (OR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.32–0.53, p < 0.001) and lower odds of prolonged LOS > 2 days (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.28–0.49, p < 0.001. After adjusting for potential confounders, enhanced monitoring remained associated with a reduction in composite cardio-respiratory complications (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46–0.88, p = 0.005).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that postoperative enhanced monitoring pathway was associated with a lower incidence of cardio-respiratory composite events, compared to a standard of care, in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. As our results show association rather than causation, future prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of enhanced monitoring. Findings of our study add to the existing literature involved in clinical management pathways to reduce the incidence of adverse postoperative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing inpatient surgeries.     

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Can We Rely on the Key Factors or Do We Need the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bel Ensemble</Emphasis>?

Background

The success of enhanced recovery (ERAS) pathways depends on the actual application of the intended protocol (adherence), but its full implementation remains challenging. In order to potentially streamline the pathway, it is indispensable to know the impact of individual items and the entire protocol on clinical outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective analysis including all consecutive colorectal ERAS patients since implementation (May 2011) until February 2014; demographics, adherence and outcomes were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Primary outcome was the impact of individual item and of the entire protocol on complications (overall and major) and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis included logistic multivariate regression and adjustment for confounding factors.

Results

There were 328 patients with complete data sets analyzed. A minimally invasive approach [odd ratio (OR) 0.62; confidence interval (CI) 0.4–0.9] was significantly associated with less overall complications. In contrast, the use of prophylactic nasogastric tubes (OR 3.18; CI 1.4–7.4), prophylactic abdominal and pelvic drains (OR 1.96; 1.2–3.2) and intraoperative thoracic epidural analgesia (OR 1.76; CI 1.3–2.4) were associated with more overall complications. Minimal invasive approach was further associated with reduced hospital stay (OR 0.5; CI 0.4–0.7) and less major complications (OR 0.58; CI 0.4–0.8). Higher adherence to the entire ERAS protocol was associated with significantly less complications (P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Minimally invasive surgery was the single most important component of the ERAS pathway while nasogastric tubes, drains and epidurals should be avoided. Overall, increasing adherence with the protocol was associated with better outcomes and should be the goal.

     

Effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: A matched-pair cohort analysis

Study objectiveIt has not yet been established whether total hip arthroplasty complications are associated with anesthetic technique (spinal versus general). This study assessed the effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on health care resource utilization and secondary endpoints following total hip arthroplasty.DesignPropensity-matched cohort analysis.SettingAmerican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participating hospitals from 2015 to 2021.PatientsPatients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (n = 223,060).InterventionsNone.MeasurementsThe a priori study duration was 2015 to 2018 (n = 109,830). The primary endpoint was 30-day unplanned resource utilization, namely readmission and reoperation. Secondary endpoints included 30-day wound complications, systemic complications, bleeding events, and mortality. The impact of anesthetic technique was investigated with univariate analyses, multivariable analyses, and survival analyses.Main resultsThe 1:1 propensity-matched cohort included 96,880 total patients (48,440 in each anesthesia group) from 2015 to 2018. On univariate analysis, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of unplanned resource utilization (3.1% [1486/48440] vs 3.7% [1770/48440]; odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90]; P < .001), systemic complications (1.1% [520/48440] vs 1.5% [723/48440]; OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.80]; P < .001), and bleeding events requiring transfusion (2.3% [1120/48440] vs 4.9% [2390/48440]; OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.49]; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, spinal anesthesia remained an independent predictor of unplanned resource utilization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90]; c = 0.646), systemic complications (AOR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81]; c = 0.676), and bleeding events (AOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.49]; c = 0.686). Hospital length of stay was also shorter in the spinal anesthesia cohort (2.15 vs 2.24 days; mean difference, −0.09 [95% CI, −0.12 to −0.07]; P < .001). Similar findings were observed in the cohort from 2019 to 2021.ConclusionsTotal hip arthroplasty patients receiving spinal anesthesia experience favorable outcomes compared to propensity-matched general anesthesia patients.     

Comparative study of postoperative complications after open and laparoscopic surgery of the perforated peptic ulcer: Advantages of the laparoscopic approach

BackgroundDespite the acceptance of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers, its definitive implantation is still a matter of discussion. We performed a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approach focused on postoperative surgical complications.MethodsRetrospective observational study in which patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcus in our center between 2001 and 2017 were analyzed. Only those in whom suture and/or omentoplasty had been performed were selected, either for open or laparoscopic approach. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative variables, complications, mortality and length of stay were collected. Both groups, open and laparoscopic surgery patients, were compared.ResultsThe final study sample was 250 patients, 190 (76%) men and 60 (24%) women, mean age 54 years (SD ± 16.7). In 129 cases (52%), the surgical approach was open, and in 121 (48%) it was laparoscopic. Grades III-V complications of the Clavien-Dindo Classification occurred in 23 cases (9%). Operative mortality was 1.2% (3 patients). Laparoscopically operated patients had significantly fewer complications (p = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, laparoscopic approach (p = 0.025; OR:0.45–95%CI: 0.22–0.91), age (p = 0.003; OR:1.03–95%CI: 1.01–1.06), and Boey score (p = 0.024 – OR:1.71 – CI95%: 1.07–2.72), were independent prognostic factors for postoperative surgical complications.ConclusionLaparoscopic surgery should be considered the first-choice approach for patients with perforated peptic ulcer. It is significantly associated with fewer postoperative complications and a shorter hospital stay than the open approach.