Sildenafil citrate improves erectile function and urinary symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, double-blind trial

PURPOSE: We evaluated sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms in men with the 2 conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo controlled study of sildenafil in men 45 years or older who scored 25 or less on the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function and 12 or greater on the International Prostate Symptom Score. Men with confirmed or suspected prostate malignancy, or prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or more were excluded. End points were changes in International Index of Erectile Function domain scores, International Prostate Symptom Score (irritative, obstructive and quality of life), the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index, the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction Index Score. RESULTS: The 189 men receiving sildenafil had significant improvements in erectile function domain score vs the 180 on placebo (9.17 vs 1.86, p<0.0001) and on all other International Index of Erectile Function domains. In men on sildenafil vs placebo significant improvements were observed in International Prostate Symptom Score (-6.32 vs -1.93, p<0.0001), Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (-2.0 vs -0.9, p<0.0001), mean International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life score (-0.97 vs -0.29, p<0.0001) and total Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire scores (24.6 vs 4.3, p<0.0001). There was no difference in urinary flow between the groups (p=0.08). Significantly more sildenafil vs placebo treated patients were satisfied with treatment (71.2 vs 41.7, p<0.0001). Sildenafil was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Improved erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms with sildenafil in men with the 2 conditions were associated with improved quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Daily dosing with sildenafil may improve lower urinary tract symptoms. However, the lack of effect on urinary flow rates may mean that a new basic pathophysiology paradigm is needed to explain the etiology of lower urinary tract symptoms.     

The impact of sildenafil citrate on sexual satisfaction profiles in men with a penile prosthesis in situ

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil in increasing penile glans tumescence and improving patient satisfaction in men with a penile prosthesis, as this remains a major treatment for erectile dysfunction but a common complaint is the lack of glans engorgement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To determine whether sildenafil combined with a penile prosthesis improves satisfaction, patients used an implant alone for at least 1 month, after which they completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. The same patients were then given sildenafil citrate and completed the IIEF questionnaire after using the sildenafil/implant combination. RESULTS: Patients who responded to sildenafil with glans engorgement reported significantly greater satisfaction scores than with an implant alone. CONCLUSION: We currently offer sildenafil citrate after implantation to all men who have a penile prosthesis placed.     

Sildenafil versus continuous positive airway pressure for erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnea： a comparat-ive study of their efficacy and safety and the patient＇s satisfaction with treatment

Aim： To assess the efficacy of sildenafil and continuous positive airway pressure （CPAP） in the treatment of concurrent erectile dysfunction （ED） with obstructive sleep apnea （OSA）, and to gauge the level of treatment satisfaction in patients and their partners. Methods： Forty men were treated for 12 weeks with sildenafil 100 mg （20 men） or CPAP during nighttime sleep （20 men）. Treatment efficacy was assessed by the rate of successful intercourse attempts, and satisfaction with treatment was assessed by patients＇ and partners＇ answers to question 1 of the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction. Results： Under sildenafil, 128 of 249 （51.4%） intercourse attempts were successful; under CPAP, 51 of 193 （26.9%） attempts were successful （^cp 〈 0.001）. Erectile function was improved in both groups. After sildenafil and CPAP treatment, the mean International Index for Erectile Function domain scores were 14.3 and 10.8, respectively （^bp = 0.025）, compared to 7.8 and 7 at baseline, respectively. CPAP and sildenafil were well tolerated. Sporadic episodes of nasal dryness under CPAP and transient headache and flushing under sildenafil were not significant. Fifty percent of patients treated with sildenafil and 25% with CPAP were satisfied with the treatment, and their partners were equally satisfied. The satisfaction scores for both patients and partners under sildenafil were superior to those under CPAP （^cP 〈 0.002）. Conclusion： Both sildenafil 100 mg and CPAP, used separately, had positive therapeutic impact but sildenafil was superior. Patients and their partners were more satisfied with sildenafil for the treatment of ED. However, because of the high proportion of dissatisfied men and partners, new therapeutic agents or a combination of the two methods must be studied further.     

Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil,intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice

PURPOSE: We compared erectile function status and satisfaction rates in patients who received treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 (ICI) and penile implant surgery (IPP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 138 consecutive patients who received treatment for ED between April 2000 and April 2001 were considered candidates for study. Mean followup was 19.54 months. Of the patients 27 were not available for followup and 26 were not on any form of treatment. Of the patients receiving treatment for ED 85 were administered the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory for Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire and the Erectile Function Domain (EFD) of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire. Three treatment groups were identified, including 31 patients on sildenafil citrate, 22 on ICI and 32 who underwent IPP. Mean total EDITS, EDITS Index and EFD scores in the 3 groups were considered for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the total EDITS (25.59 versus 27.06, p = 0.48), EDITS Index (58.16 versus 61.15, p = 0.49) or EFD (22.91 versus 20.26, p = 0.12) score between the groups on ICI and sildenafil citrate, respectively. Total EDITS, EDITS Index and EFD scores were significantly higher in patients who underwent IPP than those on sildenafil citrate (36.09 versus 27.06, p <0.001, 82.03 versus 61.51, p <0.001 and 27.88 versus 20.26, p <0.001, respectively). Total EDITS, EDITS Index and EFD scores were significantly higher in patients who underwent IPP than those on ICI (36.09 versus 25.59, 82.03 versus 58.16 and 27.88 versus 22.91, respectively, all p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: At a mean followup of 19.54 months patients who underwent penile implant surgery had significantly better erectile function and treatment satisfaction than those receiving sildenafil citrate and intracavernous prostaglandin E1.     

Clinical efficacy of sildenafil in patients on chronic dialysis

PURPOSE: We evaluate the clinical efficacy of sildenafil citrate for patients who are on chronic dialysis and who have concomitant erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 men (mean age 60.7 years) on dialysis and with erectile dysfunction of various etiologies were administered 25 to 100 mg sildenafil for at least 6 months. The International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF), a global assessment question and partner satisfaction question were used to evaluate sildenafil efficacy. Patients also reported any adverse events that occurred during treatment. RESULTS: Treatment was effective for 28 of the 35 (80%) patients according to the results of the IIEF and global assessment questions. Partner satisfaction correlated with the IIEF overall response (0.79) and global assessment question results (0.86). No correlation was found between sildenafil failure and patient age, the etiology of erectile dysfunction, duration of erectile dysfunction, prior treatments, testosterone and prolactin blood levels, and the duration and etiology of renal failure. Of the 35 patients sildenafil was stopped due to intolerable headaches in 3 and because of lack of efficacy in 7. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is an effective and safe treatment for erectile dysfunction in most patients on chronic dialysis.     

Combination therapy: medicated urethral system for erection enhances sexual satisfaction in sildenafil citrate failure following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

The objective of our study was to assess the effectiveness of combining medicated urethral system for erection (MUSE) with sildenafil citrate in men unsatisfied with the sildenafil alone. Baseline and follow-up data from 23 patients (mean age, 62.5 +/- 5.23 years) unsatisfied with the use of the sildenafil citrate alone for the treatment of erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (mean use, 4 attempts/100-mg dose) was obtained. All patients started oral sildenafil citrate more than 6 months after radical prostatectomy. Combination therapy was initiated using 100 mg sildenafil citrate orally 1 hour prior to intercourse. Patients used combination therapy for a minimum of 4 attempts prior to assessment with the Sexual Health Inventory of Men (International Index for Erectile Function-5) and visual analog scale to gauge rigidity (0-100). The effect of therapy on the total International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF) score and penile rigidity score was assessed. Of the 23 patients, 4 (17%) had no improvement with the addition of medicated urethral system for erection and discontinued the drug, while 19 (83%) reported improvement with the penile rigidity and sexual satisfaction. The IIEF scores of these 19 patients showed significant improvements in each sexual domain, and the patients reported that erection was sufficient for vaginal penetration 80% of the time. Rigidity scores on a scale of 0-100 with sildenafil alone averaged 38% (23-53) for men and 46% (26-67) for their partners. With the addition of MUSE, scores increased to 76% for men and 62% for their partners. We conclude that the addition of MUSE to sildenafil improved sexual satisfaction and penile rigidity in patients unsatisfied with sildenafil alone.     

Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Preservation of sexual function is one of the main objectives in radical prostatectomy. We assessed possible predictive factors for postoperative sexual function including preoperative International Index of Erectile Function score, age and extent of nerve sparing procedures for more precise preoperative counseling of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2001 a total of 694 patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer underwent nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Preoperative erectile function was assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function score. After at least 12 months of followup patients were asked to answer the International Index of Erectile Function and Quality of Life Questionnaire C 30 via mail. RESULTS: A total of 411 patients responded to the questionnaire, 122 of whom underwent unilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy and 289 underwent bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Data on preoperative and postoperative International Index of Erectile Function scores were available for 389 patients. Data on the International Index of Erectile Function and the postoperative Quality of Life Questionnaire C 30 were available for 382 patients. The median decrease in International Index of Erectile Function score was 7 points. Patients undergoing unilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy had a significantly stronger decrease in International Index of Erectile Function score compared to patients undergoing the bilateral nerve sparing procedure (12 vs 6 points). Preoperative International Index of Erectile Function score and extent of nerve sparing (unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy) were significantly associated with better postoperative sexual function whereas age was not. Based on preoperative International Index of Erectile Function score, surgical technique and age, the likelihood of postoperative satisfactory erectile function can be defined preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the impact of the extent of nerve sparing (unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy) and highlighted the effect of preoperative erectile function as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function and age at surgery on postoperative sexual function. Our data can be used for counseling patients undergoing radical nerve sparing prostatectomy regarding recovery of erectile function.     

Sildenafil versus the vacuum erection device: patient preference

PURPOSE: We evaluated the preference of patients with erectile dysfunction who had been effectively treated with a vacuum erection device and then switched to sildenafil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 patients with erectile dysfunction who achieved satisfactory erectile function according to the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) while using a vacuum erection device were switched to an increasing dose of sildenafil (range 25 to 100 mg.) until satisfactory erection was maintained at least twice a week for at least 1 month. The 2 treatment methods were not used concomitantly. A total of 36 patients with a mean age of 59 years (range 35 to 77) who claimed to have achieved satisfactory erections with a vacuum erection device and sildenafil reported their preference to continue sildenafil or resume the use of a vacuum erection device, reasons for the choice and any adverse side effects. RESULTS: Of the 36 participants in whom the efficacy of sildenafil was similar to that of a vacuum erection device according to the IIEF scores (mean plus or minus standard deviation 61.6 +/- 10.4 and 62.5 +/- 6, respectively), 12 (33.3%) decided to resume use of a vacuum erection device (group 1) while 24 (66.6%) preferred to continue sildenafil (group 2). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding patient age or the etiology and duration of erectile dysfunction. The increase in the IIEF score while using a vacuum erection device was higher in group 1 than 2, with a mean of 66.75 versus 60.4, respectively (p = 0.002). The adverse side effects of sildenafil were the main reasons for preferring a vacuum erection device. Fewer ejaculatory difficulties, efficacy, comfort and ease of use were the main reasons for choosing sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: Even in an era of effective oral medication, the vacuum erection device remains a preferred treatment option for a substantial number of patients with erectile dysfunction.     

Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of therapeutic success with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with different spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, open, prospective, before-after study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil therapy for erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury, and the association between the response to sildenafil and factors such as causes and levels of spinal cord injury, grade of ASIA deficit, time since injury, orgasmic perception, and degree of baseline erection. SETTING: Homes of outpatients of 16 spinal cord injury units in Spain. METHOD: One hundred and seventy patients with erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury, from whom baseline data were collected on their sexual function, and who started treatment with sildenafil 50 mg. An efficacy assessment was made by the patient and his partner, and the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was recorded. RESULTS: It was reported by 88.2% of the patients and 85.3% of their partners that treatment with sildenafil had improved their erections, regardless of the baseline characteristics of the spinal cord injury and erectile function. In responders, this improvement was confirmed by an increase from 12.5 to 24.8 points (P<0.001) of the Erectile Function Domain of IIEF. A significant improvement was also seen in patients' satisfaction with sexual activity and general satisfaction derived from sexual life. Preservation of orgasmic perception and a baseline degree of erection of 3 or 4 (P=0.006) were predictors of therapeutic success. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury, regardless of the cause, neurological level, ASIA grade, and time since injury. SPONSORSHIP: Spanish Society of Paraplegia.     

Impact of erectile dysfunction on confidence, self-esteem and relationship satisfaction after 9 months of sildenafil citrate treatment

PURPOSE: The first double-blind, placebo controlled trial in the United States of the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire revealed that treatment with sildenafil citrate improves erectile function and measures of quality of life in men with erectile dysfunction. We investigated long-term improvement, and correlations between improved erectile function and confidence, self-esteem and sexual relationship satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 36-week open label extension of the double-blind, placebo controlled trial. The blind was not broken. Patients were 18 years or older with clinically diagnosed erectile dysfunction. Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Self-esteem, confidence and relationship satisfaction were assessed using the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire. Correlations were determined using Pearson's product moment coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 204 participants were enrolled in the open label extension, including 108 on placebo and 96 on sildenafil. In men who received placebo in the double-blind, placebo controlled phase mean erectile function scores and self-esteem, confidence and relationship satisfaction scores were increased significantly at week 36 of the open label extension (p < 0.0001). Men who received sildenafil in the double-blind, placebo controlled phase maintained high scores in the open label extension. Correlations between improved erectile function, and self-esteem, confidence and relationship satisfaction were strong and positive (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Open label extension sildenafil after double-blind, placebo controlled placebo significantly improved erectile function, self-esteem, confidence and relationship satisfaction. Following an initial 12 weeks of double-blind, placebo controlled sildenafil therapy for erectile dysfunction improvements were sustained an additional 9 months. Positive correlations between erectile function, and self-esteem, confidence and relationship satisfaction suggest that improved erectile quality can improve long-term psychosocial quality of life.     

Initial results utilizing combination therapy for patients with a suboptimal response to either alprostadil or sildenafil monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: Intraurethral alprostadil and oral sildenafil are useful in selected patients. However, there continues to be a significant treatment failure rate. Since their mechanisms of action are different, we wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 214 patients treated for erectile dysfunction (ED), 65 were not fully satisfied with the firmness of their erections via monotherapy. Responses were evaluated using the International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire before and after treatment. Group I consisted of 33 patients who tried maximal dose intraurethral alprostadil monotherapy initially, followed by the maximal dose of sildenafil monotherapy, and were still unsatisfied. Group II consisted of 32 patients who tried the maximal dose sildenafil monotherapy initially, followed by the maximal dose of alprostadil monotherapy, and were also unsatisfied. There 65 patients then underwent combination therapy. RESULTS: 60 out of the 65 patients stated they were satisfied with combination therapy. Questionnaire scores for erectile function were 23.1+/-2.0 (114%) for combination therapy vs. 19.2+/-1.8 (77%) and 15.2+/-1.6 (41%) for sildenafil and alprostadil monotherapies (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in responses between the two groups. The men also reported improvement in intercourse and overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy may be an option for motivated patients who have a suboptimal response from monotherapy.     

Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treatment of erectile dysfunction: effect of type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treatment of erectile dysfunction: effect of type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 466 male patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) were enrolled in this study. Of them 382 were diabetic and 84 were non-diabetic. Patients were screened for ED using the erectile function domain of the International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF). Patients underwent routine laboratory investigations, in addition to total testosterone and prolactin assessment. To assess the effect of diabetes on efficacy of sildenafil, we compared the pre and post sildenafil responses to erectile function domain, Q3, Q4. Overall satisfaction and global efficacy question (GEQ) were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean age +/- S.D. was 53 +/- 8.4 and 49.7 +/- 10.6 years for patients with and without diabetes respectively. There were significant associations between increased severity of ED and longer duration, poor metabolic control and presence of more than one diabetes-related complication (p < 0.05 for each). Differences were significant between pre and post sildenafil administration regarding erectile function domain, Q3, Q4 (p < 0.05 for each). In the non-diabetic patients the GEQ and the overall satisfaction were significantly higher than in diabetics (p < 0.05 for each). Global efficacy question was significantly low in patients with fair and poor metabolic control, longer duration of diabetes, and patients with diabetic complications (p < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is an effective treatment for diabetic patients with ED. Although the efficacy of sildenafil was negatively affected by factors as poor control and longer duration of diabetes and presence of more than one diabetes-related complication, however, the global efficacy and the overall patients' satisfaction were high.     

Improvement in emotional well-being and relationships of users of sildenafil

PURPOSE: We estimated the association of sildenafil use with erectile function, relationship with sexual partner, functional status and emotional well-being in men with erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Letters were mailed to eligible patients at a university hospital urology and internal medicine clinic, and university affiliated community primary care clinics by the primary care provider or urologist inviting them to participate in the study. Of the eligible sample 124 men (53%) completed and returned a survey, including 85 who reported current sildenafil use. Change scores in these patients were calculated using the International Index of Erectile Function, marital interaction scale from the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System Short Form, 5-item emotional well-being scale of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. RESULTS: Sildenafil users reported an 88% increase in erectile function scores, 60% increase in overall sexual satisfaction and 36% increase in intercourse satisfaction related to the use of sildenafil (p <0.001). Of the respondents 38% indicated that using sildenafil had definitely improved quality of life. Likewise 29% of respondents indicated that using sildenafil had definitely improved the relationship with their partner. With sildenafil there was a statistically significant improvement in the scores of erectile and sexual function (p <0.001), sexual partner relationship (p = 0.007) and emotional well-being (p <0.001). In a multivariate model improved erectile function and sexual partner relationship were each significantly associated with improved emotional well-being (R2 = 0.20, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil users reported significant improvements in erectile and sexual function that were associated with positive changes in emotional well-being and the sexual partner relationships with their sexual partner.     

Oral Agents: First-Line Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction

Oral agents are relatively non-invasive, reversible, readily administered and well tolerated; hence, they are emerging as first-line treatments for patients with erectile dysfunction. Two medications have been licensed in Europe: the dopamine agonist sublingual apomorphine, which influences central regulatory mechanisms, and the phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor sildenafil citrate, which affects local regulation of erectile function by potentiating the effects of nitric oxide. Two other potent, selective, reversible PDE5 inhibitors (tadalafil and vardenafil) are under regulatory review in Europe, the United States and other countries. In double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, these compounds significantly enhanced erectile function and increased the likelihood of successful sexual intercourse largely irrespective of etiology or severity of erectile insufficiency. Apomorphine and PDE5 inhibitors also significantly improved scores in the erectile function, orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction domains of the International Index of Erectile Function. Oral agents were well tolerated; adverse events were generally mild or moderate, prompting premature treatment discontinuation in a small minority of patients. The chief adverse effects with apomorphine were nausea and headache, and with PDE5 inhibitors, headache, dyspepsia and flushing. Because of a potential pharmacodynamic interaction between PDE5 inhibitors and nitrates or nitric oxide donors that has been associated with hypotension, concomitant nitrate use is an absolute contraindication. However, the actual incidences of myocardial infarction in sildenafil and tadalafil patients are similar to those in placebo controls.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil for treating erectile dysfunction in patients on dialysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients on haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), as men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) often have sexual dysfunction (up to 82% among those on chronic dialysis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with ED and in ESRD participated in an open-label prospective study. Thirty patients on HD and 11 on PD were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Fugl-Meyer life-satisfaction scale before and after sildenafil treatment. A total score in the erectile function domain of < or = 25 was accepted as indicating ED. All patients were started on a 25-mg dose, which was increased to 50 mg if there was no response after two trials. In addition, the overall efficacy question was used to evaluate satisfaction, and patients reported any side-effects during treatment. RESULTS: The erectile function and intercourse satisfaction domains improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). After sildenafil treatment, two-thirds of those on HD (20/30) and nine of the 11 on PD recovered their erectile function. The pretreatment scores on the IIEF and four domains (except sexual desire) of those responding were significantly higher than in those not responding (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate on the overall efficacy question was 80% and 82% for the HD and PD groups, respectively. At least one side-effect was seen in 17 patients (43%); one had severe hypotension in the PD group. Overall, mild headache (seven patients, 18%) and flushing (12, 30%) were reported most often. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is a safe and satisfactory drug for improving erectile function in patients with ESRD. Patients were satisfied whether treated by HD or PD. Pretreatment scores on the IIEF may be useful for predicting the success of treatment.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in hemodialysis patients

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is more frequent among end-stage renal failure patients than the normal population. Sildenafil citrate has been successfully used for the symptomatic treatment of erectile dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of ED in patients on hemodialysis. Fifty-five hemodialysis patients above 18 years suffering from ED with steady sexual partners were included in the study. The first five and fifteenth questions of the International Index of Erectile Function were employed to evaluate ED in the patient group. A Single 50-mg sildenafil citrate tablet was prescribed for each patient. The patients were encouraged to take it on the day after hemodialysis and 1 hour before sexual intercourse. The erectile function of the patients after the treatment was re-evaluated in the same manner by International Index of Erectile Function. The ages of the patients ranged between 30 and 73 years (mean 50.6 +/- 10.9). The overall response rate was 74.5% (38/51). Side effects were nausea (n = 2), palpitation (n = 2), flushing (n = 1), and angina (n = 1). Sildenafil citrate (50 mg) was observed to be safe and effective for treatment of hemodialysis patients with careful evaluation and proper patient selection.     

SILDENAFIL CITRATE AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY

PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction continues to be a significant problem for men after radical retropubic prostatectomy despite nerve sparing techniques. Sildenafil citrate (Viagra) has proved effective for erectile dysfunction in many men. We determine the efficacy of sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy and examine variables that may impact the response to treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 84 men were prescribed sildenafil after radical retropubic prostatectomy and asked to complete a series of questionnaires, including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), on erectile function before and after sildenafil administration. The importance of factors, such as patient age, time since surgery, degree of cavernous nerve sparing, preoperative prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical and pathological stage, and baseline postoperative erectile function, was examined. RESULTS: Of the 84 patients 45 (53%) had improved erections and 34 (40%) had improved ability for intercourse while taking sildenafil. Mean IIEF score for the erectile function domain increased from 9 to 14 (p <0.001). Orgasmic function (p = 0.004) and intercourse satisfaction (p = 0.009) also significantly improved. The degree of nerve sparing and baseline postoperative erectile dysfunction had a significant impact on the ability of sildenafil to improve erectile function (p = 0.010 and p <0.001, respectively) and total IIEF questionnaire responses (p = 0.031 and p <0.001, respectively). Age and pathological stage also appeared to have a significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil improved erectile function and the ability to have intercourse in more than half of men after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Baseline postoperative erectile function, which is dependent on the degree of nerve sparing technique, significantly impacts the likelihood that patients will respond to sildenafil.     

Tadalafil once daily and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the management of patients with Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction: results from a prospective randomized trial

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy improves erectile function in patients with Peyronie's disease. However, erectile dysfunction still persists in many cases. We aimed to investigate the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy plus tadalafil 5 mg once daily in the management of patients with Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction not previously treated. One hundred patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either extracorporeal shock wave therapy alone for 4 weeks (n = 50) or extracorporeal shock wave therapy plus tadalafil 5 mg once daily for 4 weeks (n = 50). Main outcome measures were: erectile function (evaluated through the shortened version of the International Index of Erectile Function), pain during erection (evaluated through a Visual Analog Scale), plaque size, penile curvature and quality of life (evaluated through an internal questionnaire). Follow-up evaluations were performed after 12 and 24 weeks. In both groups, at 12 weeks follow-up, mean Visual Analog Scale score, mean International Index of Erectile Function score and mean quality of life score ameliorated significantly while mean plaque size and mean curvature degree were unchanged. Intergroup analysis revealed a significantly higher mean International Index of Erectile Function score and quality of life score in patients receiving the combination. After 24 weeks, intergroup analysis revealed a significantly higher mean International Index of Erectile Function score and mean quality of life score in patients that received extracorporeal shock wave therapy plus tadalafil. In conclusion extracorporeal shock wave therapy plus tadalafil 5 mg once daily may represent a valid conservative strategy for the management of patients with Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction.     

Is sildenafil citrate associated with an amelioration of the symptomatology of androgen decline in the aging male?

PURPOSE: We examined whether treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil citrate is associated with amelioration of the symptomatology of androgen decline in the aging male, and whether this alters the endocrine pattern. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, crossover study with sildenafil citrate was conducted in 60 men (age range 47 to 75 years old) who presented with erectile dysfunction and screened positively for androgen decline in the aging male by the questionnaire of the same name. The patients were randomized to receive sildenafil citrate or placebo in a 1:1 ratio and were crossed over after 3 months of treatment for an additional 3 months. The evaluation included International Index Erectile Function and Aging Male Symptoms questionnaires, hormonal profiles, total testosterone, and bioavailable testosterone. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients completed the study. Compared to placebo, sildenafil citrate improved erectile function (52.7 +/- 2 vs 39 +/- 1.9, p <0.001) and Aging Male Symptoms score (33.5 +/- 1.3 vs 28.6 +/- 1.3, p <0.001) in the total group. Breakdown into hypogonadal and normal men showed that the International Index of Erectile Function score improved more in normal (Delta 18.5 +/- 3.6) than in hypogonadal men (Delta 6.7 +/- 2.7). There were no differences in improvement on the Aging Male Symptoms questionnaire between hypogonadal and normal men. No treatment changes were observed in total testosterone and bioavailable testosterone. CONCLUSIONS: In the total group of patients sildenafil citrate was associated with expected improvement in erectile function and in the Aging Male Symptoms questionnaire without any alteration in hormonal pattern. The available questionnaires for androgen decline in the aging male are not specific for the diagnosis of biochemical androgen decline in the aging male, although the suboptimal response to sildenafil citrate suggests the presence of hypogonadism.     

A prospective evaluation of efficacy and compliance with a multistep treatment approach for erectile dysfunction in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To assess the response rate to different erectile aids in a consecutive series of patients treated with non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy (NNSRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four potent men were counselled about the different treatment options to restore an assisted erection before they had NNSRP. They were invited to participate in a multiphase protocol involving the sequential use of different erectile aids which aimed at restoring erectile function after surgery. The first proposed treatment was oral apomorphine sublingual. Patients with a positive response to the 1-item overall efficacy question and a minimum score of 3 in both question 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function were considered responders to oral pharmacotherapy. Treatment with sildenafil was then suggested to those not responding. If patients did not respond to oral pharmacotherapy a trial with a vacuum erectile device was offered; those not responding to this were then offered intracavernosal injection therapy with prostaglandin-E alone as the first option, followed by a mixture of vasoactive agents if needed. In those in whom injections also failed, a penile implant was recommended. At the 1-year follow-up visit all patients were offered a second trial with oral therapy regardless of the treatment currently in use. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients entered the protocol; there was no response to apomorphine. Five of 59 (8%) patients responded to sildenafil when they first used it at a mean of 7 months after NNSRP, while there were three additional responders in 22 patients who tried it for a second time a year later. Of patients achieving at least a complete tumescence sufficient for vaginal penetration, 52% and 60% were considered responders to the vacuum device and intracavernosal injections, respectively. Overall, 44% of patients enrolled in the protocol chose to use an erectile aid for at-home use. At the 1-year follow-up, only 20% of patients were still using an erectile aid, including two who had had a penile implant. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 10% of patients may achieve a clinically significant erection with sildenafil after NNSRP, but 80% will not be using any erectile aid at 1 year after surgery. In the present study protocol the proposed erectile aids were largely inadequate for treating the permanent erectile dysfunction that follows NNSRP.