Anidulafungin: an evidence-based review of its use in invasive fungal infections

INTRODUCTION: Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin antifungal agent with indications for use in esophageal candidiasis and candidemia. The mortality and morbidity associated with fungal infections in healthcare facilities necessitates the development of new treatment options for these diseases. AIMS: This review assesses the pharmacology and evidence for the use of anidulafungin in the treatment of serious fungal infections. EVIDENCE REVIEW: There is substantial evidence that anidulafungin is a potent antifungal agent with activity against a broad range of fungal species. Likewise, evidence supports that anidulafungin is a well-tolerated antifungal agent. Clinical studies provide sufficient evidence for regulatory approval for esophageal candidiasis and candidemia, and limited evidence suggests that anidulafungin may be superior to fluconazole for candidemia and invasive candidiasis. The introduction of anidulafungin into clinical practice adds a third option for therapy in the echinocandin class. Research into its efficacy in other fungal infections is ongoing, and further studies into the impact of anidulafungin on economic outcomes will be beneficial. PLACE IN THERAPY: Current evidence supports the use of anidulafungin in the management of candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, and invasive candidiasis, as demonstrated by the successful results in large multicenter clinical trials.     

A comparative evaluation of properties and clinical efficacy of the echinocandins

With the increase in prevalence of fungal infections, newer antifungal agents are needed to effectively treat invasive disease, and at the same time minimize adverse effects from therapy. The echinocandins comprise a novel class of antifungals; their mechanism of action involves inhibiting 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase, which is essential in cell wall synthesis for certain fungi. All three echinocandins are US FDA-approved for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin and anidulafungin are licensed for the treatment of candidemia, and other select forms of invasive candidiasis. Micafungin is at present the only echinocandin approved for prophylaxis of fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplants; whereas caspofungin is approved for empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia. Although all three echinocandins are active against Aspergillus, only caspofungin is presently approved for salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis. Combination therapy with echinocandins plus other licensed antifungal therapy shows promise in treating invasive aspergillosis. This article will explore the similarities and differences among the echinocandins.     

Anidulafungin: an echinocandin antifungal

Anidulafungin (LY-303366, V-echinocandin trade mark, Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is a new echinocandin antifungal agent with broad spectrum activity against Candida and Aspergillus spp. Anidulafungin exhibits low toxicity, concentration-dependent fungicidal activity for Candida, and a prolonged post antifungal effect (> 12h). In vitro activity demonstrates excellent potency and spectrum versus azole-susceptible and -resistant Candida spp. and a low minimum effective concentration for Aspergillus spp. In vivo anidulafungin is fungicidal against Candida in neutropenic animal models of disseminated candidiasis. Against Candida anidulafungin exhibits concentration-dependent killing and clearance of residual fungal burden in target organs (liver, lung, spleen, kidney) and plasma/tissue concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory and minimum fungicidal concentrations of the infecting organism throughout the dosing interval. Although the activity of anidulafungin in animal models of pulmonary or disseminated aspergillosis shows increased survival and improvement in the pulmonary infarct score, the effect on residual fungal burden and Aspergillus antigenemia determination does not indicate in vivo fungicidal activity. It seems that the major effect of anidulafungin and other echinocandins in vivo against Aspergillus spp. is the decrease in the angioinvasive potential of the organisms. Clinically, anidulafungin has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis and candidemia. Further clinical application of this new antifungal agent is warranted.     

Anidulafungin: a new echinocandin for the treatment of fungal infections

Immunocompromised hosts are at increased risk for invasive fungal infections. Over the last five decades, the mainstay of therapy against systemic mycoses has revolved around amphotericin B deoxycholate. Unfortunately, this drug has substantial toxicities, and agents such as fluconazole were developed as an alternative to treat and prevent these invasive infections. Due to widespread use, fluconazole-resistant organisms have emerged; therefore, new agents with improved safety, efficacy and tolerability have now become desirable. The echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agents with novel activity against the fungal cell wall. In February 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the echinocandin anidulafungin for the treatment of patients with candidemia, peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscesses and esophageal candidiasis.     

A comparative evaluation of properties and clinical efficacy of the echinocandins

With the increase in prevalence of fungal infections, newer antifungal agents are needed to effectively treat invasive disease, and at the same time minimize adverse effects from therapy. The echinocandins comprise a novel class of antifungals; their mechanism of action involves inhibiting 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase, which is essential in cell wall synthesis for certain fungi. All three echinocandins are US FDA-approved for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin and anidulafungin are licensed for the treatment of candidemia, and other select forms of invasive candidiasis. Micafungin is at present the only echinocandin approved for prophylaxis of fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplants; whereas caspofungin is approved for empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia. Although all three echinocandins are active against Aspergillus, only caspofungin is presently approved for salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis. Combination therapy with echinocandins plus other licensed antifungal therapy shows promise in treating invasive aspergillosis. This article will explore the similarities and differences among the echinocandins.     

Anidulafungin: an echinocandin antifungal

Anidulafungin (LY-303366, V-echinocandin?, Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is a new echinocandin antifungal agent with broad spectrum activity against Candida and Aspergillus spp. Anidulafungin exhibits low toxicity, concentration-dependent fungicidal activity for Candida, and a prolonged post antifungal effect (> 12h). In vitro activity demonstrates excellent potency and spectrum versus azole-susceptible and -resistant Candida spp. and a low minimum effective concentration for Aspergillus spp. In vivo anidulafungin is fungicidal against Candida in neutropenic animal models of disseminated candidiasis. Against Candida anidulafungin exhibits concentration-dependent killing and clearance of residual fungal burden in target organs (liver, lung, spleen, kidney) and plasma/tissue concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory and minimum fungicidal concentrations of the infecting organism throughout the dosing interval. Although the activity of anidulafungin in animal models of pulmonary or disseminated aspergillosis shows increased survival and improvement in the pulmonary infarct score, the effect on residual fungal burden and Aspergillus antigenemia determination does not indicate in vivo fungicidal activity. It seems that the major effect of anidulafungin and other echinocandins in vivo against Aspergillus spp. is the decrease in the angioinvasive potential of the organisms. Clinically, anidulafungin has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis and candidemia. Further clinical application of this new antifungal agent is warranted.     

Echinocandins: A ray of hope in antifungal drug therapy

Invasive fungal infections are on the rise. Amphotericin B and azole antifungals have been the mainstay of antifungal therapy so far. The high incidence of infusion related toxicity and nephrotoxicity with amphotericin B and the emergence of fluconazole resistant strains of Candida glabrata egged on the search for alternatives. Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal drugs that act by inhibition of β (1, 3)-D- glucan synthase, a key enzyme necessary for integrity of the fungal cell wall.Caspofungin was the first drug in this class to be approved. It is indicated for esophageal candidiasis, candidemia, invasive candidiasis, empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and invasive aspergillosis. Response rates are comparable to those of amphotericin B and fluconazole. Micafungin is presently approved for esophageal candidiasis, for prophylaxis of candida infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and in disseminated candidiasis and candidemia. The currently approved indications for anidulafungin are esophageal candidiasis, candidemia and invasive candidiasis.The incidence of infusion related adverse effects and nephrotoxicity is much lower than with amphotericin B. The main adverse effect is hepatotoxicity and derangement of serum transaminases. Liver function may need to be monitored. They are, however, safer in renal impairment. Even though a better pharmacoeconomical choice than amphotericin B, the higher cost of these drugs in comparison to azole antifungals is likely to limit their use to azole resistant cases of candidial infections and as salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis rather than as first line drugs.     

Role of therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Background:

Voriconazole is a broad-spectrum, second-generation triazole antifungal agent with demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of invasive fungal infections caused by Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. Given the characteristically poor prognosis of patients with invasive fungal infections and the protracted duration of treatment required, therapeutic monitoring of voriconazole is, in theory, an attractive method to optimize antifungal therapy.

Objective:

To determine the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring for voriconazole.

Methods:

A previously published decision-making algorithm was used to assess the currently available literature on therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole.

Results:

Several analytical methods can be used to quantify plasma or serum concentrations of voriconazole. Reasons for therapeutic monitoring of this drug include wide variability both within and between individuals secondary to drug properties, drug–drug interactions, and disease states. Furthermore, voriconazole follows nonlinear pharmacokinetics with saturable hepatic clearance. Another potential factor in favour of therapeutic drug monitoring for voriconazole is genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19, whereby patients who are homozygous for poor metabolism (about 19% of non-Indian Asians) can have 4-fold greater exposure to voriconazole. The concentrations of this drug are also greater in patients with hepatic impairment. Drug–drug interactions with other substrates of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 can also alter voriconazole concentrations. However, the correlations between plasma concentrations of voriconazole and its efficacy and toxicity are not well defined. Although lower and upper target thresholds of 0.25–2 mg/L and 4–6 mg/L, respectively, have been suggested, studies to date have not been appropriately designed or powered to reveal any definitive association.

Conclusions:

Routine therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole is not recommended except in certain circumstances, such as lack of response to therapy or evidence of toxicity, in which case selective monitoring of voriconazole concentrations may be of clinical utility.     

The echinocandins: comparison of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical applications

Caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin are three drugs of the echinocandin class of antifungals available for intravenous treatment of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis. They exhibit high in vitro and in vivo activities against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. In various clinical studies investigating candidemia and invasive candidiasis, Candida esophagitis, and fever in neutropenia, the clinical efficacy of the echinocandin tested was similar to that of established antifungals. Antifungal activity against strains no longer susceptible to conventional antifungal agents, such as fluconazole and amphotericin B suggests that echinocandins can be used as salvage therapy in life-threatening fungal infections. There is no cross-resistance to other antifungals. Excellent safety and tolerability of treatment with caspofungin has been documented over a total of 4.3 million patient days. Echinocandins are poor substrates of the cytochrome P450 enzyme family and can be safely co-administered with most drugs without the need for dosage adaptation. No dose reduction is required in renal impairment. A reduction in the daily maintenance dose has been recommended for caspofungin, but not for micafungin and anidulafungin in patients presenting with mild to moderate hepatic failure.     

Risk of oral antifungal agent-induced liver injury in Taiwanese

Aim

Oral antifungal agent-induced liver injury is a common safety concern that may lead to patients'' hesitation in treating fungal infections such as onychomycosis. This study evaluated risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) caused by oral antifungal agents in Taiwanese populations.

Methods

A population-based study was conducted by analyzing who used oral antifungal agents from 2002 to 2008 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. A comparison control group was randomly extracted from the remainder of the original cohort.

Results

Of the 90 847 oral antifungal agents users, 52 patients had DILI. Twenty-eight DILI cases used ketoconazole, 12 fluconazole, eight griseofulvin, three itraconazole and two terbinafine. The incidence rates (IR) of DILI per 10 000 persons were 31.6, 4.9, 4.3, 3.6 and 1.6 for fluconazole, ketoconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole and terbinafine, respectively. Longer exposure duration increased the risk of DILI, with IR for exposure duration ≥ 60 defined daily dose (DDD) of 170.9, 62.5, and 36.1 per 10 000 persons for ketoconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine, respectively. Patients taking antifungal agents had higher incidences of developing DILI compared with those in the control group after adjusting for age, gender and co-morbidities (relative risk 2.38, P < 0.001). All of the six patients with fatal DILI used fluconazole. Old age and fluconazole increased the risk of oral antifungal-induced fatal DILI.

Conclusions

Oral antifungal agents are associated with low incidence of acute liver injury, but which may be fatal, especially for the elderly. Longer treatment duration may increase the risk of antifungal agent-induced liver injury, especially ketoconazole.     

Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal cancer using ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay

Aim:

Current chemotherapy for esophageal cancer is conducted on the basis of empirical information from clinical trials, which fails to take into account the known heterogeneity of chemosensitivity between patients. This study was aimed to demonstrate the degree of heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal cancers.

Methods:

A total of 42 esophageal cancer specimens were collected. The heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal cancer specimens was examined using an ex vivo ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA).

Results:

Thirty eight specimens produced evaluable results (90.5%). The most active single agent tested was nedaplatin, to which 28.9% of samples were sensitive. Combinations of chemotherapy agents exhibited much higher sensitivity: cisplatin+paclitaxel was sensitive in 16 of 38 (42.1%) of samples, while nedaplatin+paclitaxel was more effective, which was sensitive in 20 of 38 cases (52.6%).

Conclusion:

There was a marked heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal cancer. Chemosensitivity testing may provide a practical method for testing new regimens before clinical trials in esophageal cancer patients.     

In vitro interactions of anidulafungin with azole antifungals, amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine against Candida species

Anidulafungin, an echinocandin, is in late stage development for the treatment of fungal infections. We investigated the activity of anidulafungin in combination with other antifungal agents (fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine) against four isolates each of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis, and two isolates of Candida krusei using a macrobroth chequerboard method with interactions evaluated by fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs). Additive activity (FICI > 0.5 to 1) or indifference (FICI > 1 to < 4) was observed in 85 of 90 interactions of anidulafungin with another antifungal agent. Synergy with itraconazole (FICIor=4), a drug rarely used systemically, was noted for four strains of C. tropicalis. The combination of anidulafungin and amphotericin B demonstrated additive activity for each of the 18 isolates of Candida tested. These results suggest additional studies are warranted, for example in animal models, to evaluate further the potential of combination antifungal therapy with anidulafungin for Candida infections.     

The antimicrobial effects of selenium nanoparticle-enriched probiotics and their fermented broth against Candida albicans

Background

Lactic acid bacteria are considered important probiotics for prevention of some infections. The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of selenium dioxide on the antifungal activity of Lactobacillus plantarum and L. johnsonii against Candida albicans.

Methods

Lactobacillus plantarum and L. johnsonii cells, grown in the presence and absence of selenium dioxide, and their cell-free spent culture media were tested for antifungal activity against C. albicans ATCC 14053 by a hole-plate diffusion method and a time-kill assay.

Results

Both L. plantarum and L. johnsonii reduced selenium dioxide to cell-associated elemental selenium nanoparticles. The cell-free spent culture media, from both Lactobacillus species that had been grown with selenium dioxide for 48 h, showed enhanced antifungal activity against C. albicans. Enhanced antifungal activity of cell biomass against C. albicans was also observed in cultures grown with selenium dioxide.

Conclusions

Selenium dioxide-treated Lactobacillus spp. or their cell-free spent broth inhibited the growth of C. albicans and should be investigated for possible use in anti-Candida probiotic formulations in future.     

The echinocandins

The changing pattern in fungal infections has driven the need to expand the targets of antifungal activity. The echinocandins are the newest addition to the arsenal against fungal infections. Three echinocandins have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration: caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin. These agents have a broad spectrum of activity and are similar to each other with respect to in vitro activity against Candida sp, with micafungin and anidulafungin having similar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) that are generally lower than the MIC of capsofungin. The MICs of the echinocandins are highest against Candida parapsilosis; however, whether this will affect clinical outcomes is unknown. Several case reports have identified clinical failure due to elevated MICs with caspofungin or micafungin against Candida albicans, Candida krusei, and C. parapsilosis. Resistance to the echinocandin class was present in some but not all of the isolates. Empiric therapy with one of the echinocandins for candidemia or invasive candidiasis in patients with neutropenia and those without neutropenia appears to be appropriate when one factors in mortality rate, the increasing frequency of non-albicans Candida infections, and the broad spectrum, safety, and fungicidal effect of the echinocandins. After speciation of the organism, continued therapy with an echinocandin can and should be reevaluated. The echinocandins demonstrate similar in vitro and in vivo activity against Aspergillus sp, but only caspofungin is approved for treatment in patients who are intolerant of or refractory to other therapies. Voriconazole and amphotericin B have demonstrated synergy with the echinocandins. The clinical response to combination therapy has been variable; however, the mortality rate appears to be lower with combination therapy than monotherapy. Large controlled trials are needed to determine the role of combination therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Micafungin and anidulafungin generally have a lower frequency of adverse reactions compared with caspofungin. Phlebitis (3.5-25% of patients) and elevated liver enzyme levels (1-15%) occur more often with caspofungin compared with micafungin and anidulafungin (< 8%). Overall, the three echinocandins are relatively safe and effective agents for the treatment of Candida infections.     

Comparison of Continuous and Intermittent IV Infusion of Vancomycin: Systematic Review

Background:

There is some evidence that administration of vancomycin by continuous infusion has pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages over traditional intermittent dosing. Whether these advantages translate into clinical efficacy remains controversial.

Objective:

To review the literature comparing continuous infusion of vancomycin and conventional intermittent IV dosing in terms of efficacy and safety.

Methods:

A literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and by means of the Google search engine, and the reference lists of pertinent articles were searched manually. All human studies published in English or French that evaluated vancomycin given by continuous and intermittent IV infusion were reviewed. Articles that did not include a comparator arm and those that assessed continuous and intermittent intraperitoneal infusions were excluded. The level of evidence of each study was categorized according to the US Preventive Services Task Force rating scale.

Results:

In total, 9 studies were identified: 1 in a pediatric population and 8 in adult populations. Of the 3 studies with the highest quality of evidence (level I), one demonstrated pharmacodynamic advantages with continuous infusion of vancomycin. Of the 6 studies representing a moderate level of evidence (level II), 3 also favoured continuous infusion in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes, but the findings in terms of clinical outcomes were mixed.

Conclusions:

Current evidence evaluating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages and clinical efficacy of continuous versus intermittent vancomycin infusions is inconsistent and does not support the routine use of continuous infusion for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections.     

Erlotinib and pantoprazole: a relevant interaction or not?

AIMS

There is increasing evidence that erlotinib exposure correlates well with treatment outcome. In this report we present a case of therapeutic drug monitoring of erlotinib in a patient with a gastric ulcer, treated with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole. This agent may cause an unwanted, but not always unavoidable, interaction since absorption of erlotinib is pH dependent.

METHODS

Erlotinib trough concentrations were monitored in a patient during treatment with orally and intravenously administered pantoprazole.

RESULTS

Erlotinib trough concentrations were diminished during high dose intravenously administered pantoprazole, but returned to normal when the dose was reduced and pantoprazole was administered orally.

CONCLUSIONS

More studies are needed to assess the dose dependency of the interaction between pantoprazole and erlotinib. Furthermore, we advise to monitor closely erlotinib plasma concentrations and adjust the erlotinib dose accordingly when a clinically relevant interaction is suspected and no proper dosing guidelines are available.     

Laundry Detergent Pod Ingestions: Is There a Need for Endoscopy?

Introduction

Laundry detergent pod (LDP) exposures in children have resulted in several referrals to the emergency department. Signs and symptoms can include gastrointestinal symptoms (vomiting, drooling), neurological symptoms (depressed sensorium), or metabolic changes (lactic acidosis). There is limited literature on esophageal injury following LDP ingestions.

Case Series

We reviewed three cases of pediatric LDP ingestions that underwent an upper endoscopy in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. All of our patients were younger than 3 years old. The upper endoscopies revealed superficial esophageal erosions in two patients and erythema in the other. None of the patients had oral burns. Two of them developed swallowing dysfunction. Follow-up upper GI studies were normal.

Case Discussion

Our three patients ingested laundry detergent pods and all of them developed some degree of esophageal injury despite the absence of oral erythema, ulcers, or swelling. A review of literature suggests LDP exposures are more severe than non-pod detergents. Reasons as to why this may be remain unclear, although investigation into the ingredients and mode of delivery may help us to better understand. In a literature review, no esophageal strictures have been reported after LDP ingestion. We reviewed esophageal injury classification systems in an attempt to predict who may be at greatest risk for stricture based on initial findings.

Conclusion

Our case series demonstrates it is hard to predict esophageal injury based on signs and symptoms. Based on a literature review, long-term esophageal stricture is unlikely, but if gastrointestinal symptoms persist, it is reasonable to evaluate with an upper endoscopy. Larger studies are needed.     

Fungal transformation of androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione by Aspergillus brasiliensis

Background

The biotransformation of steroids by fungal biocatalysts has been recognized for many years. There are numerous fungi of the genus Aspergillus which have been shown to transform different steroid substances. The possibility of using filamentous fungi Aspergillus brasiliensis cells in the biotransformation of androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione, was evaluated.

Methods

The fungal strain was inoculated into the transformation medium which supplemented with androstadienedione as a substrate and fermentation continued for 5 days. The metabolites were extracted and isolated by thin layer chromatography. The structures of these metabolites were elucidated using ¹H-NMR, broadband decoupled ¹³C-NMR, EI Mass and IR spectroscopies.

Results

The fermentation yielded one reduced product: 17β-hydroxyandrost-1,4-dien-3-one and two hydroxylated metabolites: 11α-hydroxyandrost-1,4-diene-3,17-dione and 12β-hydroxyandrost-1,4-diene-3,17-dione.

Conclusions

The results obtained in this study show that A. brasiliendsis could be considered as a biocatalyst for producing important derivatives from androstadienedione.     

Anidulafungin: a drug evaluation of a new echinocandin

Background: Over the past two decades, the frequency and type of invasive fungal infections have increased greatly and thus have driven the need for new antifungal agents. Anidulafungin is the newest addition to the echinocandin armamentarium. Objective: The intention of this review is to provide a drug evaluation of anidulafungin, including its spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, adverse event profile, and its role in the treatment of invasive candidiasis. Methods: A PubMed search was performed to gather the most current and pertinent articles. Conclusions: Clinical trials have demonstrated anidulafungin's efficacy and tolerability in invasive candidiasis. Anidulafungin is not associated with any drug–drug interactions and does not require dosage adjustment in patients with renal and/or hepatic impairment.     

Adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy

Introduction:

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an idiopathic chronic inflammatory disease that has prominent effects on the spine and peripheral joints. In addition, extraarticular manifestations such as enthesitis and acute anterior uveitis may be clinically important. In recent years, the therapy of AS has changed, largely due to the introduction of inhibitors of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Adalimumab, a human monoclonal antibody specifically for TNF, is the most recent of the TNF blocking agents that have been approved for the treatment of active, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-refractory patients with AS.

Aims:

To evaluate the evidence for the therapeutic value of adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis.

Evidence review:

There is clear evidence that adalimumab, administered 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks, substantially improves the signs and symptoms of NSAID-refractory, active AS when compared with placebo treatment. There is ample evidence that adalimumab causes significant improvements in physical health status and overall AS-specific, health-related quality of life and physical functioning, which consequently leads to better work productivity. There is substantial evidence that adalimumab improves spinal and sacroiliac joint inflammation in AS patients. Initial results from clinical trials suggest that there is no increased risk of serious infections or malignancies in adalimumab-treated patients with AS. The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions. Limited economic evidence suggests that adalimumab 40 mg may be cost effective when used according to current valid treatment guidelines.

Place in therapy:

Adalimumab is an effective treatment for patients with active AS.