Surgical repair of aneurysms involving the suprarenal, visceral, and lower thoracic aortic segments: early results and late outcome

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to review our experience with surgical repair of lower thoracoabdominal and suprarenal aortic aneurysms to determine early and late survival rates and identify factors influencing morbidity and survival among these patients. MATERIALS: From 1989 through 1998, 165 consecutive patients underwent repair of 108 thoracoabdominal (55 group III and 53 group IV) and 57 suprarenal aneurysms. The study group consisted of 109 men and 56 women with a mean age of 70 years (median, 70 years; range, 29-89 years). Mean aneurysm diameter was 6.9 cm (median, 6.5 cm; range, 4-12 cm). There were 125 aneurysms (76%) repaired electively; 40 repairs (24%) were nonelective. The cause of 12 aneurysms (7%) was chronic aortic dissection; the remaining 153 (93%) were degenerative aneurysms. RESULTS: The early postoperative (30-day) mortality rates were 7% (9/125) for elective and 23% (9/40) for nonelective operations (P =.016). For both elective and urgent procedures, early mortality was 1.8% (1/57) for suprarenal aneurysm repair, 11% (6/53) for group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms, and 20% (11/55) for group III thoracoabdominal aneurysms (P =.013, suprarenal vs group III). Spinal cord ischemia occurred after 6% (10/165) of aneurysm repairs (4% paraplegia, 2% paraparesis). None of the 57 suprarenal aneurysm repairs were complicated by spinal cord ischemia, whereas it occurred in 2% (1/53) of group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms and 16% (9/55) of group III thoracoabdominal aneurysms (P =.001, suprarenal vs group III; P =. 016, group IV vs group III). Three (25%) of the 12 patients with dissection developed spinal cord ischemia; this compared with seven (5%) of 153 patients with degenerative aneurysms (P =.027). The cumulative 3-year survival rate for the entire series was 71% (95% CI, 64%-79%), and 5-year survival was 50% (95% CI, 40%-60%). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms involving the suprarenal, visceral, and lower thoracic aorta may be repaired with acceptable perioperative mortality and late survival rates. The risk of spinal cord ischemia is increased for patients with aortic dissection and may be stratified according to the proximal extent of the aneurysm.     

The effect of aortic dissection on outcome in descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

It is estimated that 20% to 40% of the patients who survive the acute phase of aortic dissection will develop significant aneurysmal dilatation of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta. Aortic dissection has long been considered a risk factor for mortality and neurologic deficit following surgical repair of the descending thoracic and/or thoracoabdominal aorta. In this article we review the surgical approach to patients with aortic dissection and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and discuss the impact of adjuncts on survival and neurologic outcome.     

Hybrid procedures as a combined endovascular and open approach for pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies

OBJECTIVES: to report our experience with hybrid vascular procedures in patients with pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies. METHODS: 68 patients were treated for thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies between October 1999 and February 2004; 19 patients (16 men; mean age 68, range 40-79) with high risk for open thoracoabdominal repair were considered to be candidates for combined endovascular and open repair. Aortic pathologies included five thoracoabdominal Crawford I aneurysms, one postdissection expanding aneurysm, three symptomatic plaque ruptures (Crawford IV), five combined thoracic descending and infrarenal aneurysms with a healthy visceral segment, three juxtarenal or para-anastomotic aneurysms, and two patients with simultaneous open aortic arch replacement and a rendezvous maneuver for thoracic endografting. Commercially available endografts were implanted with standardized endovascular techniques after revascularization of visceral and renal arteries. RESULTS: Technical success was 95%. One patient developed a proximal type I endoleak after chronic expanding type B dissection and currently is waiting conversion. Nine patients underwent elective, five emergency and five urgent (within 24 h) repair. 17 operations were performed simultaneously, and 2 as a staged procedure. Postoperative complications include two retroperitoneal hemorrhages, and one patient required long-term ventilation with preexisting subglottic tracheal stenosis. Thirty-day mortality was 17% (one multiple organ failure, one secondary rupture after open aortic arch repair, one myocardial infarction). Paraplegia or acute renal failure were not observed. Total survival rate was to 83% with a mean follow-up of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm results of combined endovascular and open procedures in the thoracoabdominal aorta are encouraging in selected high risk patients. Staged interventions may reduce morbidity.     

Operative mortality rate for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is not increased by the presence of a previous or concurrent thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissection

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the likelihood of mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in patients with thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissection. METHODS: Fourteen patients (11 men, three women) with known thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissections underwent elective AAA repair from 1986 to 2001, including three patients with acute dissections (less than 14 days) and 11 patients with chronic dissections (14 days or longer). All 14 patients had type III aortic dissections. Stent graft exclusion of the aortic dissection was performed in one patient before AAA repair. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative events, perioperative complications, and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were assessed. RESULTS: Elective AAA repair in the setting of thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissection in this series was associated with no 30-day mortality and a 1-year mortality rate of 7.1%. Furthermore, preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative events, and perioperative complications did not appear to be associated with late, 1-year, mortality. CONCLUSION: Elective AAA repair in the setting of acute or chronic aortic dissection is associated with mortality rates similar to those generally attributed to elective AAA repair without accompanying aortic dissection. Nevertheless, the conduct of the operation is usually complex, especially in the setting of an acute aortic dissection.     

INFRARENAL AORTIC ANEURYSM SURGERY IN A RURAL SURGICAL SERVICE: RISK FACTORS FOR MORTALITY

Background : An audit of both the emergency and elective abdominal aortic surgery that was performed in a rural surgical service, was carried out. Methods : Retrospective data analysis was performed on 41 patients who were treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) during an 8-year period from 1989 to 1996. Postoperative outcomes were analysed with respect to patient age, mode of presentation (elective or emergency), transfusion requirements and pre-existing cardiac and respiratory disease. Univariate analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, and the odds ratio for adverse outcome was calculated. Results : A postoperative mortality rate of 5.8% in elective repairs and 68% in cases of rupture was noted. Pre-existing respiratory disease, transfusion requirements of more than six units and presentation with retroperitoneal leak or rupture correlated with postoperative mortality, while age and pre-existing cardiac disease were shown not to be predictive of adverse outcome following surgery. Conclusions : An overall improvement in operative outcomes in the institution (Wimmera Base Hospital) that was audited would be affected by earlier referral for elective repair in selected patients. Like others, the authors believe that age on its own is not a contraindication to elective AAA repair.     

Repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurisms by the use of hypothermic circulatory arrest

From 1993 to 2003, repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using hypothermic circulatory arrest via the left thoracotomy was performed in 115 patients at our hospital. Ninety-one of them were elective cases and 24 of them were emergent cases. Hospital mortality rate was 3.3% in elective cases and 12.5% in emergent cases. Over all hospital mortality rate was 5.2%. Ischemic spinal cord injury was occurred in 2 patients (1.7%). Both of them needed total replacement of thoracoabodominal aorta by the graft. In the near future, Adamkiewicz artery may be detected by the imaging technology preoperatively and we expect the repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm may become safer operation avoiding spinal cord injury. Hypothermic circulatory arrest is a relatively safe and reliable method for the repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.     

A new predictive model for adverse outcomes after elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Recent recommendations have emphasized individualized treatment based on balancing a patient's risk of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm rupture with the risk of an adverse outcome after surgical repair. The purpose of this study was to determine which preoperative risk factors currently predict an adverse outcome after elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: A single, composite end point termed adverse outcome was defined as the occurrence of any of the following: death within 30 days, death before discharge from the hospital, paraplegia, paraparesis, stroke, or acute renal failure requiring dialysis. A risk factor analysis was performed using data from 1,108 consecutive elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. RESULTS: The incidence of an adverse outcome was 13.0% (144 of 1,108 patients); predictors included preoperative renal insufficiency (p = 0.0001), increasing age (p = 0.0035), symptomatic aneurysms (p = 0.020), and extent II aneurysms (p = 0.0001). These risk factors were used to construct an equation that estimates the probability of an adverse outcome for an individual patient. CONCLUSIONS: This new predictive model may assist in decisions regarding elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm operations. For patients who are acceptable candidates, contemporary surgical management provides favorable results.     

Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: combined experience from the EUROSTAR and United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the initial and 1-year outcome of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections collated in the European Collaborators on Stent Graft Techniques for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection Repair (EUROSTAR) and the United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. METHODS: Four hundred forty-three patients underwent endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease between September 1997 and August 2003 (EUROSTAR, 340 patients; UK, 103 patients). Patients represented 4 major disease groups: degenerative aneurysm (n = 249), aortic dissection (n = 131), false anastomotic aneurysm (n = 13), and traumatic aortic injury (n = 50). RESULTS: Mean age in the entire study group was 63 years. Fifty-two percent of patients were deemed at high risk for open surgery because of major comorbidity. Sixty percent of patients underwent an elective procedure, and 35% required emergency treatment. Conventional indications for treatment of aortic dissection, including aortic expansion, continuous pain, rupture, or symptoms of branch occlusion constituted the basis for endograft placement in 57% of patients, whereas in 43% of patients aortic dissections were asymptomatic. Primary technical success was obtained in 87% of patients with degenerative aneurysm and in 89% with aortic dissection. Paraplegia was a postoperative complication in 4.0% of patients with degenerative aneurysm and 0.8% of patients with aortic dissection (not significant). Thirty-day mortality in the entire study group was 9.3%, with mortality rates after elective procedures of 5.3% for degenerative aneurysms and 6.5% for aortic dissection. Mortality for degenerative aneurysm after emergency repair was higher (28%; P <.0001) then after elective procedures. For aortic dissection the emergency repair rate was 12% (not significant compared with elective repair of aortic dissection, and P = .025 compared with emergency repair of degenerative aneurysm). One-year follow-up was complete in 195 patients. The outcome at 1 year was more favorable for aortic dissection than for degenerative aneurysm with regard to aortic expansion (0% vs 15%; P = .001) and late survival (90% vs 80%; P = .048). In the groups with false anastomotic aneurysm and traumatic aortic injury, 30-day mortality rates were 8% and 6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This multicenter experience demonstrates acceptable rates for operative mortality and paraplegia after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease. Outcome after 30 days and 1 year was more favorable for aortic dissection than for degenerative aneurysm. However, the durability of this technique is currently unknown, and continued use of registries should provide data from long-term follow-up.     

Long-term results of total aortic arch replacement using selective cerebral perfusion

From June 1994 to July 2001, 92 consecutive patients underwent total aortic arch replacement using hypothermic selective cerebral perfusion. Forty-four patients had nondissecting fusiform or saccular aneurysms (non-ruptured 34, ruptured 10), and 48 patients had dissection (acute 37, chronic 11). Hospital mortality rate was 6.8% in the nondissecting group and 6.3% in the dissecting group. No major operative cerebral complications were observed. There were 9 late deaths in the nondissecting group and 5 late deaths in the dissecting group. The actuarial survival rate was 61.6% after 100 months in the nondissecting group and 82.5% after 86 months in the dissecting group (p = 0.5128). In the postoperative aortic accidents, there were 2 cases of the descending aortic rupture and 2 cases of cholesterol crystal embolization in the nondissecting group and 3 cases of thoracoabdominal grafting, 2 cases of re-operation in the ascending aorta and 1 case of descending aortic rupture in the dissection group. The actuarial freedom from aortic accidents was 88% after 100 months in the nondissecting group and 80% after 86 months in the dissecting group (p = 0.6908). Our surgical outcome of total aortic arch replacement using hypothermic selective cerebral perfusion are satisfactory.     

Clamp before you cut: Proximal control of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using endovascular balloon occlusion--Case reports

While the mortality rate for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has declined over the last several decades, the rate for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) has unfortunately remained disturbingly high. Undiagnosed aneurysms may present with little warning until abdominal pain, syncope, and hypotension signify rupture. Fifty percent of patients with ruptured aneurysms die before reaching a medical facility, and their survival is highly dependent on hemodynamic stability at presentation. The degree of rupture containment and comorbid status of the patient determine hemodynamic stability. Endovascular stent grafting has significantly improved perioperative morbidity and mortality rates for elective AAA repair, and some of the same endovascular techniques can be used to obtain proximal control in patients presenting with RAAA. We describe 3 consecutive cases of RAAA where proximal control was obtained using a percutaneously placed, transfemoral aortic occlusion balloon before induction of anesthesia.     

Evolving experience with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a single institution

Fifty-seven patients underwent repair of atherosclerotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms between 1978 and 1990. Five patients had urgent surgery for rupture. The 30-day operative mortality rate for the entire group was 18% (10 patients). Before July 1987, 19 patients (group 1) were operated on by use of a technique previously described. In these earlier patients the peritoneum was routinely entered, the diaphragm was divided radially, and no heparin was given. Among patients in group 1 there was a 30-day operative mortality rate of 42% (8 patients), and morbidity included myocardial infarction 4 (21%), respiratory failure 9 (47%), renal failure 12 (63%), bleeding requiring reoperation 4 (21%), and intestinal ischemia 3 (16%). Since July 1987 a standardized approach to all elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has been used in 38 patients (group 2). This method uses a left thoracoabdominal incision, circumferential division of the hemidiaphragm, retronephric totally extraperitoneal aortic exposure, single lung anesthesia, full heparinization, the graft inclusion technique, and liberal use of visceral endarterectomy. Patients in group 2 sustained a 30-day operative mortality rate of 5% (2 patients) and morbidity included myocardial infarction 2 (5%), respiratory failure 10 (26%), renal failure 11 (29%), bleeding requiring reoperation 1 (3%), paraplegia 6 (16%), and paraparesis 4 (11%). Modern surgery for repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm results in acceptably low operative mortality rates. Spinal cord ischemia remains an unresolved source of morbidity.     

Recent advances in the surgical treatment of aortic disease in Japan

The annual survey by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery in 2010 found that the nationwide hospital mortality rate after surgery was 11.1% in 3,628 patients with acute type A aortic dissection, 18.9% in 158 patients with acute type B dissection, 6.0% in 866 patients with chronic type A dissection, 6.6% in 724 chronic type B dissection, 4.3% in 6,348 patients with nondissection thoracic aortic aneurysm, and 24.8% in 715 ruptured thoracic aneurysms. For abdominal aortic aneurysms, the hospital mortality rate after elective surgery was 2.3% and 15.3% in ruptured aneurysms among 7,906 patients nationwide. These results are superior to the results of aortic surgery in Western countries.     

Natural history of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectivesElucidating critical aortic diameters at which natural complications (rupture, dissection, and death) occur is of paramount importance to guide timely surgical intervention. Natural history knowledge for descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is sparse. Our small early studies recommended repairing descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms before a critical diameter of 7.0 cm. We focus exclusively on a large number of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms followed over time, enabling a more detailed analysis with greater granularity across aortic sizes.MethodsAortic diameters and long-term complications of 907 patients with descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were reviewed. Growth rates (instrumental variables approach), yearly complication rates, 5-year event-free survival (Kaplan–Meier), and risk of complications as a function of aortic height index (aortic diameter [centimeters]/height [meters]) (competing-risks regression) were calculated.ResultsEstimated mean growth rate of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms was 0.19 cm/year, increasing with increasing aortic size. Median size at acute type B dissection was 4.1 cm. Some 80% of dissections occurred below 5 cm, whereas 93% of ruptures occurred above 5 cm. Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm diameter 6 cm or greater was associated with a 19% yearly rate of rupture, dissection, or death. Five-year complication-free survival progressively decreased with increasing aortic height index. Hazard of complications showed a 6-fold increase at an aortic height index of 4.2 or greater compared with an aortic height index of 3.0 to 3.5 (P < .05). The probability of fatal complications (aortic rupture or death) increased sharply at 2 hinge points: 6.0 and 6.5 cm.ConclusionsAcute type B dissections occur frequently at small aortic sizes; thus, prophylactic size-based surgery may not afford a means for dissection protection. However, fatal complications increase dramatically at 6.0 cm, suggesting that preemptive intervention before that criterion can save lives.     

Endovaskuläre und kombiniert offen-chirurgische Rekonstruktion der thorakoabdominellen Aorta

Purpose

Open surgical grafting of the thoracoabdominal aorta is the method of first choice in this field. However, it is linked to a significant perioperative complication rate (paraplegia, renal failure) and mortality rate. Do risk patients with cardiopulmonary disease and complex aortic pathology particularly benefit from the advantages of minimally invasive exclusion as simultaneous or sequential hybrid procedures by combining endovascular and conventional vascular reconstruction? We report on indication, concept, and preliminary results of combining endovascular therapy with conventional aortic surgery in order to minimize the perioperative stress.

Methods and results

Over a period of 3.5 years (October 1999 to May 2003) 19 patients with complex thoracoabdominal aortic pathology (16 men, 3 women, median age: 68 years) were provided with very long (>30 cm) aortic endografts (2–4 endografts) and an occlusion of the celiac trunk (n=6) or a combination of open surgical revascularization of the visceral arteries and/or the renal arteries (n=11). The indication range covered five patients with Crawford type I thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) and one patient with chronic expanding type B dissection, three symptomatic plaque ruptures in Crawford type IV TAAA, five combined thoracic aneurysms of the descending aorta and infrarenal aortic aneurysms with an hourglass-shaped exclusion of the visceral segment, three juxtarenal or para-anastomotic aneurysms, and two patients with a simultaneous open aortic arch replacement and rendezvous maneuver of a thoracic endograft with direct suture to the aortic arch replacement. Three different endograft systems were applied (Talent 6, Excluder TAG 12, Lifepath 1). Nine patients underwent elective surgery, five were hemodynamically unstable emergency cases, and five were rated urgent (contained ruptures). In five cases implantation was carried out transprosthetically via a retroperitoneal iliac Dacron conduit. Precise endograft positioning was performed during a temporary drug-induced cardiac arrest in 11 patients. Postoperative follow-ups (median follow-up: 21 months) included clinical examinations, laboratory findings, conventional X-rays (stent integrity), and CT scans or MR angiographies optimized by contrast-enhancing agents (aortic morphology). The technical success rate of all combined interventions amounts to 100%. Complications presented as two retroperitoneal hemorrhages which required revision surgery (anastomosis of the conduit) and one long-term ventilation for a period of 5 days in a patient with preexisting subglottic tracheal stenosis. One patient developed a proximal type I endoleak after chronic expanding type B dissection and thus faces conversion despite endorepair. The 30-day mortality rate of all patients (elective and emergency cases) totals 17%: one patient with an acute type A dissection died as a result of multiple organ failure 3 weeks postoperatively (initial prolonged intestinal ischemia), another one who had presented with a ruptured type A dissection died 3 weeks postoperatively due to a secondary rupture of the conventional aortic arch anastomosis (primarily chronic infection), and one patient who had undergone elective surgery died postoperatively due to a myocardial infarction. We did not observe any perioperative paraplegia or acute renal failure. After a median of 20 months the survival rate amounts to 83%.

Conclusions

Regarding the low morbidity and mortality rates in this high-risk patient population, combined intervention in the thoracoabdominal aorta can be considered a highly promising alternative therapy concept for cardiopulmonary risk patients.

     

Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: a representative experience.

Between May 1966 and June 1991, 129 patients underwent surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with an overall 30-day mortality rate of 35%. In 75 operations (58%) performed electively, 11 deaths (15%) occurred, and in 54 cases (42%) of either symptomatic or ruptured aneurysms 34 deaths (63%; p less than 0.001) occurred. No one survived among six patients with preoperative hypotension (less than 90 mm Hg) or cardiac arrest. In 16 patients (12%) the etiology of aneurysms was a result of chronic aortic dissection, and the mortality rate in this subgroup was 44%. In the remaining 113 patients (88%) where the etiology was atherosclerosis, 38 deaths occurred (34%; p = 0.433). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in 25 cases (21%) among 116 patients who survived operation. Partial ischemia occurred in six cases (25%), and complete paraplegia occurred in the remainder. Complete and partial paraplegia occurred in 16 of 42 cases (38%) when all of the thoracic aorta was replaced (Crawford groups I, II) and in 9 of 74 cases (12%) when only the abdominal or lower thoracic aorta was replaced (Crawford groups III, IV; p = 0.016). Other complications included myocardial infarction (14 cases, 11%), respiratory failure (46 cases, 36%), and renal failure (33 cases, 27%). The major prospect for improved early survival of patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms seems to be early detection and elective repair before the occurrence of symptoms.     

Ruptured descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Advances in end-organ protection have dramatically reduced the incidence of the life-threatening complications associated with the elective repair of thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. However, in the setting of a ruptured thoracic aneurysm, one may not have the luxury of complex end-organ support. We analyzed our experience with ruptured thoracic aneurysms to define morbidity and mortality in the present era. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients with thoracoabdominal or descending thoracic aneurysms were operated on between July 1997 and October 2001. Forty presented with either a contained or free rupture. Three techniques were used for aortic reconstruction: clamp and sew, left heart bypass, and hypothermic circulatory arrest. Adjuncts for neurologic and renal support were used when circumstances and anatomy permitted. RESULTS: Seven of 40 patients died in the hospital (17.5%). Four patients died intraoperatively, all of acute myocardial infarction. Five of the seven deaths were in patients who presented in shock. Two patients (5%) experienced paraplegia, 3 (7.5%) had renal failure requiring hemodialysis, 8 (20%) required a tracheostomy, and 6 (15%) had recurrent nerve palsies. There was one stroke (2.6%). Mean diameter of ruptured aneurysms was 8.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured thoracic aneurysms can be repaired with a gratifying rate of salvage. Rapid diagnosis and triage for repair is necessary to avoid progressive deterioration into shock. The incidence of myocardial infarction, and the mortality associated with this event, underscores the need for aggressive cardiac evaluation in the elective thoracic aneurysm patient. The size at rupture also emphasizes the need for earlier referral for elective aneurysm repair.     

Influence of presentation on outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: In the absence of formal screening abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are detected in an opportunistic manner. Many remain asymptomatic and undetected until they rupture. Incidentally discovered small AAAs are entered into a surveillance programme until they reach a suitable size for repair. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the management of AAA and whether the method of presentation had an effect on subsequent mortality. DESIGN: Observational study in UK district general hospital. MATERIALS/METHODS: This study reports a single surgeon case series identified using a prospectively maintained database. Data on mode of presentation, management and mortality were retrieved from case notes, PIMS hospital database and the Office of National Statistics. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were referred with AAAs between 1992 and 2004, 78% presenting in elective circumstances. The surveillance programme fed 33% of the operated cases. Two aneurysms ruptured whilst under surveillance. Overall elective operative mortality was 11.8% and has progressively decreased over time. Thirty-day operated mortality was significantly lower in patients having a period of surveillance than those having immediate elective repair (2.3 vs. 16.3%, p=0.018). A slight reduction in emergency AAA repairs was noted over the study period (r2=0.6) although registered aneurysm deaths continue to increase (r2=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Elective mortality following AAA surgery decreased over the study period. Outcome was better in those patients who had surgery for aneurysms that had been under surveillance. Despite opportunistic screening the population adjusted mortality rate of aortic aneurysms showed a progressive increase. A reduction in deaths from aneurysms is unlikely without a formal screening programme.     

Aneurysmal change at or above the proximal anastomosis after infrarenal aortic grafting.

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm at or above the proximal anastomosis of a previous infrarenal aortic graft between 1986 and 1991. Infected grafts and patients with suprarenal aneurysms present at the time of the original graft were excluded. Twenty-one patients, 19 men and two women, were included. The original indication for surgery was aneurysm in 14 patients and occlusive disease in seven; the mean interval from initial surgery to presentation was 10 years (range, 3 to 23 years). Twelve lesions were anastomotic false aneurysms, and nine were true aneurysms beginning in the proximal juxta-anastomotic aorta. Fourteen patients had an asymptomatic abdominal mass. Seven patients had symptoms of acute expansion (three), rupture (three), or thrombosis (one). True aneurysm and symptomatic presentation were correlated with aneurysm as the original indication for surgery. Repair was accomplished by an interpositional graft in 13 and graft replacement in eight. Seven patients required suprarenal anastomosis or renal and visceral reconstruction. Five operative deaths (24%) occurred, including two of three patients with rupture (67%) and two of seven patients (28%) in the suprarenal group. The mortality rate for elective repair with an infrarenal anastomosis was 11%. Two additional late deaths occurred during the follow-up period.     

Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size

BACKGROUND: Prior work has clarified the cumulative, lifetime risk of rupture or dissection based on the size of thoracic aneurysms. Ability to estimate simply the yearly rate of rupture or dissection would greatly enhance clinical decision making for specific patients. Calculation of such a rate requires robust data. METHODS: Data on 721 patients (446 male, 275 female; median age, 65.8 years; range, 8 to 95 years) with thoracic aortic disease was prospectively entered into a computerized database over 9 years. Three thousand one hundred fifteen imaging studies were available on these patients. Five hundred seventy met inclusion criteria in terms of length of follow-up and form the basis for the survival analysis. Three hundred four patients were dissection-free at presentation; their natural history was followed for rupture, dissection, and death. Patients were excluded from analysis once operation occurred. RESULTS: Five-year survival in patients not operated on was 54% at 5 years. Ninety-two hard end points were realized in serial follow-up, including 55 deaths, 13 ruptures, and 24 dissections. Aortic size was a very strong predictor of rupture, dissection, and mortality. For aneurysms greater than 6 cm in diameter, rupture occurred at 3.7% per year, rupture or dissection at 6.9% per year, death at 11.8%, and death, rupture, or dissection at 15.6% per year. At size greater than 6.0 cm, the odds ratio for rupture was increased 27-fold (p = 0.0023). The aorta grew at a mean of 0.10 cm per year. Elective, preemptive surgical repair restored life expectancy to normal. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that (1) thoracic aneurysm is a lethal disease; (2) aneurysm size has a profound impact on rupture, dissection, and death; (3) for counseling purposes, the patient with an aneurysm exceeding 6 cm can expect a yearly rate of rupture or dissection of at least 6.9% and a death rate of 11.8%; and (4) elective surgical repair restores survival to near normal. This analysis strongly supports careful radiologic follow-up and elective, preemptive surgical intervention for the otherwise lethal condition of large thoracic aortic aneurysm.     

Surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

From July 1985 to July 1989, Loma Linda University Medical Center evaluated 46 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Forty patients were taken to surgery--18 (45%) were operated on an emergency basis for reasons including rupture (12 patients, 30%), dissection (5 patients, 12.5%), and severe pain (1 patient). The overall mortality for all operated patients was five (12.5%-17% for emergency surgery versus 9% for elective surgery). Nonfatal complications occurred in 40 per cent of patients (16). The overall incidence of paraplegia was 10 per cent (4/40), emergency patients 17 per cent (3/18) versus elective patients 4.5 per cent (1/22). Careful preoperative evaluation, standardization of operative technique, and good postoperative management have improved the outlook for these patients who otherwise would progress to eventual rupture and death. Because mortality and morbidity are substantially reduced in elective patients, we recommend that all patients with TAAAs be evaluated for surgery as soon as diagnosis is made.