Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding: A Series with Three Cases of Band Erosion

Background: Among the various operations used for surgical treatment of morbid obesity, adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) is the least invasive. Many good results have been described. During extended follow-up, however, serious complications may occur.We briefly describe our results with ASGB and will focus on three cases of band erosion. Methods: From January 1996 to December 1998, 91 patients underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in our clinic. Follow-up until now is 100%. Results: Body Mass Index (BMI) in this series decreased from 44.7 at time of operation to 34.8 at 18 months of follow-up (42 patients). Complications, minor and major, occurred in 27.5%. Three patients are described in which the gastric band migrated and had to be removed operatively. Conclusions: Satisfactory weight loss can be established by ASGB. However,serious and potentially lethal complications can occur. In view of the former Angelchik esophageal antireflux prosthesis,abandoned because of its notorious migration, we must be aggressive in evaluating band migration. Thus, we plead for international registration of adjustable silicone gastric banding.     

Retrospective Analysis of Laparoscopic Gastric Banding Technique: Short-term and Mid-term Follow-up

Background: Although adjustable gastric banding shows good results concerning weight loss, several complications such as excessive vomiting, total dysphagia, and slipping of the stomach through the band with pouch dilatation may occur rather frequently. Different types of adjustable bands are available to prevent these short- and mid-term complications. Methods: In this retrospective study, 120 consecutive laparoscopic adjustable gastric bandings were performed. In group I, 50 patients were treated with adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) by an intragastric balloon calibration technique. Group II (n = 29) received the same band by a surgical technique with tunneling behind the esophagus toward the angle of His. Group III (n = 41) received Swedish adjustable gastric banding (SAGB) by the same technique as in Group II. Results: Weight loss was approximately 15% of the excess weight after 3 months, 30% after 6 months, and 45% after 12 months in all groups. Total dysphagia was significantly more frequent in Groups I and II. The incidence of slipping of the band and pouch dilatation was more frequent in Group II. Conclusion: The diameter of the ASGB band is rather small and can cause total dysphagia independently of surgical technique. The SAGB is easy to perform and seems less vulnerable to complications like dysphagia and slipping of the band, probably because of the individual adjustment of the stoma diameter during surgery and good fixation of both band and ventral pouch with separate posterolateral sutures.     

Adjustable Gastric Banding: 5-Year Experience

Background: From 1993 to 1999, 172 patients underwent adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) or laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB). In 109 patients the adjustable band was placed via laparoscopy; in the other patients it was placed via laparotomy (prelaparoscopic era, conversions from other bariatric operations, conversions for laparoscopic failure). The conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 9.3%, occurring in the early part of our experience. Methods: Mean age was 37.9 years, weight 135 ± 14.8 kg (82-218) and BMI 46.3 ± 5.4 (35.1-69.5). All patients had multiple band adjustments, temporary antisecretive, electrolyte and vitamin therapy, and follow-up per routine. Results: Weight loss at 3 years was 30.2%; mean percent loss of excess weight was 62.5%.There was no mortality.The most important technical complications were: gastric pouch dilatation that required band replacement or removal (5.8 %); mild gastric pouch dilatation reversible with adequate dietary and pharmacological treatment (4.6%); intraoperative gastric perforation (2.3%); band migration (0.6%).The band was removed in 2.3%, with conversion to another bariatric procedure in 1.1%. Conclusions: Results have been satisfactory thus far.     

Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding (ASGB): the Italian experience

Adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) is a recently introduced gastric restrictive procedure. From April 1990 to April 1992, 85 patients underwent ASGB at our Department. Patients' characteristics were: 65 females, 20 males, mean age 39.6 years (range 17-60 years); body weight (BW) 127.9 ± 23 kg; % ideal body weight (%IBW) 205 ± 29; body mass index (BMI) 46 ± 7; morbidly obese 68, super-obese 17. Mean follow-up is 353 days. Twelve months after the operation BW was 95.2 ± 23 kg, % loss of excess BW 52.1 ± 22, and %IBW 152.2 ± 30 (45 patients). Mortality rate was zero and postoperative morbidity was insignificant. As late morbidity, we experienced two slippages of the band and six stoma-stenosis with pouch dilatation. Therefore, a surgical revision without removal of the band was performed in eight patients. The band was removed in one patient because of band erosion. In conclusion, ASGB is a safe and effective bariatric procedure. The weight loss is comparable to that produced by more extensive operations. Moreover, ASGB is fully reversible and adjustable to the patients' needs.     

Two Cases of Conversion of Vertical Ring Gastroplasty to Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding

Background: Since May 1995, we have used laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) as an alternative to silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG) to treat morbid obesity. Moreover, it seemed that ASGB was an appropriate procedure to use when SRVG had failed and no alternative procedure could be attempted again, which occurred in two patients. Because of adhesions, the laparoscopic approach was inappropriate in both cases. The size of the pouch and the staple-line were not obstacles to ASGB. Methods: Case 1 was a 53-year-old woman of 111 kg (BMI = 46) who had SRVG in July 1994. One year later, she had a 54 kg weight loss, but had continuing food intolerance, although malfunction of the pouch or ring could not be found. A removal of the ring was performed in October 1995, and a 10cm diameter silicone band placed. The band was not inflated until she had regained weight 5 months later. Case 2 was a 33-year-old woman of 100 kg (BMI = 40) who had SRVG in March 1994. Weight loss was 45 kg 18 months later; then she gained weight. Endoscopy and barium swallow showed both staple-line disruption and band erosion. Removal of the ring was performed in March 1996, and a 9.75-cm diameter silicone band placed, and inflated at the same time with 2 cc saline. Results: Both patients are doing well. Conclusions: ASGB appeared to be the best alternative when revising an SRVG in cases where a new stapling or the placement of a new ring could have had consequences more serious than the primary complications.     

Intragastric Erosion Of Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicone Gastric Band

Intragastric erosion of the adjustable silicone gastric band (ASGB) is a rare but severe complication of gastric banding, often leading to reoperation. We describe our experience with 4 cases referred to us. The best timing of removal and the choice of another bariatric procedure is still controversial. We advise to wait until migration of the band into the lumen is complete. With removal of the ASGB if another weight reduction procedure is advisable, conversion to a biliopancreatic diversion is possible.     

Laparoscopic Placement of Adjustable Silicone Gastric Band in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: How to Do It

Background: laparoscopic placement of the adjustable silicone gastric band (ASGB) was begun in our institution in 1992. Methods: this work started on the animal model first. In the animal laboratory, details of laparoscopic dissection around the pig's stomach were defined. A new prototype of the adjustable silicone band for laparoscopic use was devised. The first human laparoscopic ASGB procedure was performed in our institution on September 1, 1993; 37 patients have undergone this operation by May, 1994. There were 33 women and four men. The average pre-operative weight was 114 kg (92-160 kg). The mean BMI was 42 kg m ⁻² (37-50 kg m ⁻²). Results: no major operative difficulty has been encountered. Immediate post-operative outcome was uneventful except for one patient. Conclusion: the technique of laparoscopic ASGB is described. Preliminary weight loss is comparable to open ASGB and vertical gastroplasty, provided that the surgeon has mastered laparoscopy and open bariatric surgery.     

Disaster with a New Type of Band for Gastric Banding

Background: Laparoscopic gastric banding has become an established therapy for morbid obesity. Typical complications are band dislocation, pouch dilatation and stomach slippage. A new type of adjustable silicone band with eyes for suture fixation was proposed to avoid these complications. The experience with this new kind of band is reported. Methods: Between April 1998 and August 1998, 15 morbidly obese patients were treated by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using a new band type (manufactured by MEDING, Heinsberg, Germany).The band was fixed by single sutures using the eyes at each side of the buckle. There were 13 women and 2 men, with mean age 34 (range 21-54) years and mean body-weight 138.6 (range 113-213) kg. Results: Intraoperative complications did not occur. Postoperatively 8 patients (53%) had increasing capacity for food intake and 2 (13%) had uncharacteristic abdominal pain. Radiographs revealed band rupture in 13 of 15 patients 3-11 months postoperatively. These patients were operated laparoscopically using a new technique for band change. Now, a Lap-bandTM (Bioenterics, Carpinteria, CA, USA) was inserted and fixed to the ventral stomach with three sutures similar to a ventral fundoplication. Radiographic and clinical follow-up have been uneventful in all patients until now. Conclusion: This series demonstrated: 1) the importance of clinical follow-up; 2) a material defect of a new band type; and 3) development of a new laparoscopic technique for band change.     

Reoperation Due to Complications after Gastric Restriction Operation

Background: In the past 4 years we performed operations on 90 patients who suffered from morbid obesity. Five different operative techniques were available, vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG), gastric banding operation, adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). Methods: Two of these operations were mainly utilized. The ASGB was done routinely. The SRVG was used particularly for patients with hiatal hernia. Only one patient, who had a deformed pylorus, underwent the BPD. Results: Eleven patients had to be reoperated due to complications after the first operation of gastric restriction. They were divided into three groups depending on the type of complication: reoperation due to lack of compliance, due to technical failure, or due to other complications. In the last group we observed three patients with band perforation into the stomach without epigastric pain. This complication has, to our knowledge, only been described in very few cases. Conclusion: In some patients it remained difficult to reach adequate compliance, although we kept close contact with them after the operation. We do not yet know the reasons for the band perforation observed in three patients.     

The role of early radiological studies after gastric bariatric surgery

Background: The authors investigated early radiological findings after gastric surgery for morbid obesity to evaluate their usefulness in avoiding complications or facilitating treatment. Material and Methods: 413 patients underwent gastric bariatric surgery: 327 had vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), 55 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), 22 adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB), and 9 biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). A radiological upper gastrointestinal investigation employing water-soluble contrast medium was perform ed in each patient between the 2nd and 8th postoperative day. Several techniques were employed to assess different radiological findings related to the anatomic modifications after the bariatric surgery. Results: In VBGs, delayed emptying was found in 10 patients (3%), gastric leak in 3 patients (0.9%), vertical suture breakdown in 1 patient (0.3%), and a wide pouch in 4 patients (1.2%). In RYGBP, a leak was detected in 2 patients (3.6%), delayed emptying in 2 (3.6%), and a wide pouch in 5 (9.1%). ASGB required band enlargement for stomal stenosis in 6 patients (27.2%). Temporary delayed emptying from stomal stenosis was also observed in 2 BPDs (22.2%). Overall complications were 35/413 (8.2%). Two cases of gastric leak after VBG were reoperated. Stomal stenosis after ASGB was treated by percutaneous band deflation; other cases were medically treated until complete healing. Conclusions: Early radiological study after gastric bariatric surgery is advisable, since it detected post operative complications (gastric perforation, stomal stenosis, etc.) and modified the clinical approach. As the interpretation of these radiographs is often difficult, involving different projections or patient's positions or other technical managements, surgeons and radiologists must interact and be knowledgable.     

Use of Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding for Revision of Failed Gastric Bariatric Operations

Background: Revision of gastric bariatric operations is sometimes technically difficult and may fail to achieve prolonged weight reduction. The use of the adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) offers a new approach for these revisions. Methods: ASGB was performed as a revisional procedure on 37 patients whose initial bariatric operations were as follows: silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (21), gastric bypass (12), horizontal gastroplasty (3) and vertical banded gastroplasty (1). Results: The length of the procedure varied from 55 to 145 minutes (mean 83 minutes). Intraoperative complications included two fundic tears which were sutured without any postoperative sequelae. Five patients needed reoperation during the first postoperative year due to gastric volvulus (1), tubing tear (1) and development of postoperative ventral hernia (3). BMI fell from 44.8 ± SD 8.07 to 33.4 ± 6.9 kg/m² for patients operated with BMI higher than 35 kg/m² and from 29.2 ± 3.32 to 25.4 ± 2.8 kg/m² for patients operated with BMI lower than 35 kg/m². Conclusions: ASBG can be performed with revisions with an acceptable complication rate and post-operative weight reduction.     

Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding vs Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: a comparison of early results

The Kuzmak adjustable silicone gastric band (ASGB; 33 patients) and the vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG; 91 patients) are compared for weight loss, complication rates, and patient satisfaction. The complexity of the two operations is also compared, using operative time, blood loss, and length of hospitalization. When these three parameters were evaluated, the operations were remarkably similar, although a significant percentage of the ASGB patients left the hospital earlier than the VBG patients. The ASGB group of patients lost 52% of their excess weight (34 kg) and the VBG group 63% (40 kg), with the maximum follow-up being 15 months. Mechanical problems (leaks in the system) occurred in four ASGB patients. This slowed their weight loss and caused dissatisfaction with the procedure. Sixty-four percent of the patients underwent adjustment of the silicone band atleast once during the 15 months. Complications included stomal stenosis in 9% of the ASGB patients vs 1.3% in the VBG patients. There was one staple-line leak, one subphrenic abscess (without a leak), and one retrogastric hematoma in the VBG patients. One death occurred in the ASGB group in a patient who was found at surgery to have unanticipated post-hepatitic cirrhosis. There were no deaths in the VBG group. The conclusion reached is that the ASGB compares favorably with the VBG as a bariatric surgical procedure.     

Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding and Band Erosion: Personal Experience and Hypotheses

Background: Adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) has been advocated as a minimally invasive procedure that is completely reversible for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Band erosion (BE) is one of the possible complications of ASGB. The authors report their experience with BE and discuss its possible causes. Methods: Between February 1993 and February 1998, the authors performed 122 ASGB: 51 open and 71 laparoscopic procedures. Results: Two cases of BE occurred (1.6%). Conclusion: Band erosion is a possible complication of ASGB that is often not diagnosed immediately. Prevention is essential and consists primarily in correct placement of the band. There appears to be only one solution to BE: removal of the band. Placement of a new band after removal is possible; the minimum interval is not known.     

A Review of Seven Years' Experience with Silicone Gastric Banding

Since January 1983, silicone gastric banding (SGB) has been used with very low morbidity in 311 extremely obese patients to produce and maintain significant weight loss for as long as 7 years. A small meal-sizing pouch with reinforced small stoma is created with placement of the silicone band around the stomach. The basic operative technique involving no cutting or crushing of either the stomach or the small intestines has not changed. Strict quality control of the banding is permitted by specially designed calibration devices and other instruments. To permit correction of changes in stoma diameter occurring with the passage of time, the band was modified in 1986 by adding an adjustable portion (stoma adjustable silicone gastric banding or SASGB). Adjustment to proper size is done percutaneously through the injection port. SASGB allows corrections of most stoma-related problems non-operatively and significantly improved weight loss. One hundred and seventy-three original SGB patients (125 primary, 48 conversion) and 138 SASGB patients (93 primary, 45 conversion) were operated. At 60 months, 65 primary SGB patients averaged 47% excess weight loss (EWL). At 36 months, average EWL was significantly greater for 37 primary SASGB patients than for 94 primary SGB (64.3% vs 49.4%, p = 0.01); 84% of SASGB patients had EWL > 40% and 57% achieved EWL > 60%. SASGB generates weight loss comparable to that produced by more extensive bariatric procedures. Excellent weight loss and maintenance combined with the stoma size non-surgical adjustment ability makes SASGB attractive for use in treating bariatric patients.     

Thirteen Years of Follow-up in Patients with Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding for Obesity: Weight Loss and Constant Rate of Late Specific Complications

Background: Despite its simplicity, safety and good short-term results, progressive weight regain and a high incidence of complications have been reported after the adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB). The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of this operation in our patient population. Methods: Between 1990 and 1996, 45 morbidly obese patients underwent insertion of an ASGB. The trend of the patients' BMI over time was studied using a linear mixed effect model adjusted for the preoperative BMI. So as to estimate the cumulative probability of band removal and the cumulative hazard function, Λ(t) Kaplan-Meier analysis was used. Results: 1 year after the operation, the average BMI was 79% of its preoperative value, which then increased linearly over time. The slope of the regression line was estimated at β =0.42, indicating an average increase of 0.42 BMI units per year. 27 bands (60%) were removed because of specific late complications. The cumulative risk of band removal increased linearly with time. The hazard rate was estimated to be λ =0.008 events/patient/month, corresponding to 0.1 events/patient/year. Conclusions: ASGB yielded good short-term results, but the progressive weight regain and constant risk of complications in the long term tend to nullify the optimism.     

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: A Prospective 4-Year Follow-up Study

Background: A body mass index of ≥40 kg/m² represents clinically severe obesity and warrants operative treatment if requested. The adjustable silicone gastric band and the Swedish adjustable gastric band are recently produced laparoscopic gastric restrictive devices. The aim of this study was to assess all complications linked to both the available gastric bands in a long-term follow-up. Methods: In a prospective study, the effects, complications, and outcomes of this procedure were analyzed. The complications found were divided into early and general complications, and complications correlated to the bands. The technique of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is described. Follow-up was performed by the operating team. Results: Between July 1994 and August 1998, the authors operated on 158 patients and performed 102 adjustable silicone gastric bandings and 54 Swedish adjustable gastric bandings. The mean age at surgery was 36 years (range 17-72). The mean preoperative weight was 136 kg (89-230). Of 158 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures, 156(98%) could be followed up (mean 28 months; duration of follow-up, 6 weeks to 46 months). In early postoperative complications that required operation, one trocar wound hematoma (0.6%) and one wound infection of the port site (0.6%) were observed. The late complications that required reoperation were two pouch dilatations (1.3%), three band leakages (2%), one band migration (0.6%), and one late infection of the port (0.6%). A debanding operation was necessary in one patient because of esophageal dysmotility disorder. No early or late postoperative mortality was registered. The overall reoperation rate is currently about 7%. Conclusion: The operation is safe and effective. Moreover, adjustable gastric banding is fully reversible and is adjustable to the patient's needs. This study verifies the importance of correct operating technique. The authors' study and experience clearly indicate that laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is an attractive alternative in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.     

Adjustable gastric banding: a comparison of models

BackgroundThere are several models of adjustable gastric banding in use with little evidence for choosing a particular model. The objective of this study was to evaluate factors for selecting a particular type of band in terms of weight loss, complications, and co-morbidities.MethodsFrom July 2006 to May 2012, 222 patients underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) by a single surgeon. Patient demographic characteristics, weight loss, body mass index (BMI), percentage of weight loss (%EWL), complications, and co-morbidities were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the band model into 6 categories: 27 LAP-BAND Adjustable Gastric Banding System VG, 25 Allergan-LAGB, 20 LAP-BAND AP^M Standard, 18 LAP-BAND AP^M Large, 34 Realize Band, and 98 Realize-C band.ResultsAt 60 months follow up, in the LAP-BAND VG Group, the mean %EWL was 41%, percentage of co-morbidity improvement was 66%, and percentage of complications was 14.3%; the same percentages in the Allergan-LAGB Group were 41%, 0%, and 52%, respectively; in the LAP-BAND AP Standard Group were 42%, 20%, and 40%, respectively; in the LAP-BAND AP Large group were 38% , 12.5%, and 27.8%, respectively (at 48 months); in the Realize Band Group were 37%, 60%, and 0%, respectively (at 48 months); and in the Realize-C Band Group were 48%,12.5%, and 12.2%, respectively (at 36 months).ConclusionsIn terms of weight loss and co-morbidities, no differences were found supporting the choice of one model over the others. Short-term and long-term band-related complications occurred without any clear predilection. The port-related complications were significantly lower in the Realize bands.     

Eating Patterns in Morbidly Obese Patients Before and After a Gastric Restrictive Operation

Background: The present study was set up to analyze the relationships between eating patterns in morbidly obese patients who had undergone an adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) followed for at least 2 years and morbidly obese patients without a gastric restrictive procedure. Methods: Eating pattern was monitored by using the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire in 99 morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) preoperatively and in 31 patients who had undergone a stomach reduction by the Lap-Band? followed at least 2 years. Both groups were compared to the Dutch normative scores. Results: In the preoperative group, the scores on emotional eating and external eating were significantly higher than the Dutch normative scores. The scores on restrained eating were preoperatively equal to the Dutch normative scores. Although not significant, the scores in the postoperative group on external eating were lower than the Dutch normative scores and equal on emotional eating. The variable restrained eating postoperatively was significantly higher compared with the preoperative group. On emotional and external eating, the scores postoperatively were significantly lower compared with the preoperative group. Conclusions: According to the results, surgical treatment using an ASGB or another gastric restrictive operation could be the right solution in patients with an emotional and external eating behavior. Placement of the ASGB has a negative effect on restrained eating behavior.     

Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform an evidence-based analysis of the literature on open and laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. METHODS: Human studies on surgery for morbid obesity were conducted. Multiple publications of the same studies, abstracts, and case reports were reviewed. Current Contents, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were investigated. RESULTS: Open Roux-en-Y gastric by pass (RYGB) for morbidly obese patients and long-limb RYGB for superobese patients are highly effective procedures. Randomized controlled trials comparing malabsorptive procedures with other bariatric operations are needed. The long-term efficacy of adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) still is undetermined because of poor evidence. Laparoscopic RYGB is as safe as its open counterpart, although its long-term results are lacking. Laparoscopic ASGB is less invasive than open ASGB, although its efficacy cannot be determined because of poor evidence. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is becoming unpopular since the decreasing trend of open VBG. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is feasible, but needs further studies. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized controlled trials comparing the various laparoscopic operations are strongly needed.     

Vertical Banded Gastroplasty vs Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: a Preliminary Report

A prospective comparative study, comparing vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) with adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) has been undertaken. The purpose of the study was to see if ASGB could produce weight loss as good as VBG. Patient population was similar and patients' choice was based on informed consent. Male/female ratio and excess body weight were comparable in both groups. Early as well as late complications were minor and rare in both groups. The evaluation of the results was based on excess weight loss and BMI curves. Weight loss as well as BMI curves were quite similar in the two groups. A 50% excess weight loss has been obtained at 6 months, in both groups.