Person‐centred care in the Indonesian health‐care system

Person‐centred care (PCC) is defined as the health‐care providers selecting and delivering interventions or treatments that are respectful of and responsive to the characteristics, needs, preferences and values of the individual person. This model of care puts the person at the centre of care delivery. The World Health Organization suggests that PCC is one of the essential dimensions of health care and as such is an important indicator of health‐care quality. However, how PCC is implemented differs between countries in response to local cultures, resources and consumer expectations of health care. This article discusses person‐centred care in the Indonesian health‐care system.     

Supporting Breast‐feeding When a Woman Is Homeless

PURPOSE. This case study demonstrates use of standardized nursing languages in the care of new mothers in community settings. DATA SOURCES. The author collected data from clinical practice as an instructor in a baccalaureate nursing program and from the research literature. DATA SYNTHESIS. The appropriate nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions were identified in partnership with the new mother. CONCLUSIONS. This case shows that NANDA International (NANDA‐I), the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), and the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) are useful to direct nursing care in community settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING. When teaching nursing students in a baccalaureate program, nurse faculty can use NANDA‐I, NOC, and NIC classifications to guide the growing practice of nursing students in community settings.     

Family caregiver perspectives on social relations of elderly residents with dementia in small‐scale versus traditional long‐term care settings in the Netherlands and Belgium

Aims and objectives. To provide insight into family caregiver perspectives on social relations within the ‘caregiving triangle’ between family caregiver, professional caregiver and elderly resident with dementia. Results were compared between traditional versus small‐scale long‐term care settings in the Netherlands and Belgium. Background. Residential dementia care is shifting towards a more holistic and person‐centred approach. Until now, little is known about family caregiver perspectives. Design. A quasi‐experimental longitudinal design. Methods. This study was part of a larger research project focusing on the quality of life of residents with dementia in traditional and small‐scale settings (n = 179). This study focused on family caregivers related to these residents (n = 64). They filled in a questionnaire containing 25 items (baseline and after 12 months) related to their perspectives on the interaction within the ‘caregiving triangle’. Analyses were performed using mixed models and logistic regression. Results. Compared to traditional settings, family caregivers of relatives with dementia living in small‐scale settings had more contact with the professional caregivers, were more satisfied with this contact and felt that staff paid more attention to their feelings as family members. They also reported that staff showed better listening skills towards the residents. Furthermore, compared to those in Belgium, family caregivers in the Netherlands perceived staff to be less hurried and more accepting of help from family and felt that staff more often takes the resident seriously. Conclusion. In the move towards more person‐centred care for residents with dementia, this study finds preliminary evidence for the importance of integrating the family perspective. Relevance to clinical practice. Gaining more insight into the perspectives of family caregivers on the social relations within the ‘caregiving triangle’ may provide knowledge about the importance of the social system surrounding elderly residents with dementia and can provide pointers for future research.     

Validation of CARE‐Q in residential aged‐care: rating of importance of caring behaviours from an e‐cohort sub‐study

Aim and objective. To validate the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q‐sort questionnaire in the residential aged‐care setting. Based on this determination, to conclude with what degree of confidence the questionnaire can be used to determine the ranking of the importance of caring behaviours amongst aged‐care nurses and residents in residential aged‐care. Background. Perceptions of caring may be context specific. Caring in residential aged‐care may stand in contrast to the sense of caring understood and practiced in other settings. Design. Self‐administered survey. Methods. Residents from three not‐for‐profit aged‐care facilities, across both high‐care (nursing‐home) and low‐care (hostel care) were surveyed relying on the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q‐sort questionnaire. A sub‐sample of registered and enrolled nurses working in residential aged‐care and registered with the Nurses & Midwives e‐cohort study completed the same survey. Results. Although the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q‐sort questionnaire showed good internal consistency for the sample of nurses, the results for the residents were more erratic. Both groups displayed large ranges for the inter‐item correlations. The results of the Mann–Whitney U‐test indicated that the nurses rated the Comforts, Anticipates and Trusting relationship as significantly more important than the residents. Both groups rated the Explains and facilitates subscale as least important. All subscales, however, received median scores greater than, or equal to, six (seven‐point, Likert scale) indicating that all were considered important overall. Conclusion. Based on poor Cronbach's alpha coefficients, negative inter‐item correlations and qualitative observations, without further development within the residential aged‐care facility the free response format version of the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q‐sort may not be an appropriate measure to use with residential aged‐care residents. More research needs to be conducted into how residents and nurses are interpreting the items in the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q‐sort. Relevance to clinical practice. There will always remain a need for nurses to enact behaviours that are meaningful to residents (and patients generally).