Significance of quantitative measurement of heparin‐induced platelet antibodies

Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic immune‐mediated adverse drug reaction. Antigen and platelet activation assays are used for detection of antibodies. Quantitative results from platelet factor 4 (PF4)‐dependent immunoassays may lead to inter‐laboratory standardization of measurements. Objectives: The aim was to modify a PF4‐dependent immunoassay to measure PF4/heparin antibodies quantitatively. Methods: Over five consecutive years, 1070 samples from thrombocytopenic, heparin‐treated patients were analyzed by a PF4/heparin ELISA and the heparin‐induced platelet activation assay (HIPA). Results of ELISA assay were expressed as arbitrary units per liter (AU/L). Results: Precision of ELISA at the concentration of 50 AU/L was 3.6%. Of 1070 samples, 117 were positive for antibodies by ELISA and/or HIPA assay. The higher the antibody concentration was, the higher was the proportion of HIPA positive cases (>140 AU/L, 100%, n = 26; 100–140 AU/L, 55%, n = 20; 50–99 AU/L, 38%, n = 29; 30–49 AU/L, 17%, n = 36). Conclusions: The measurement of anti‐PF4/heparin antibody concentration is a new parameter that may improve the diagnosis of HIT. All samples with extremely strong antibody concentration were positive also by HIPA. For accuracy, antibody concentrations must be in the linear range of the assay and an international standard is needed.     

The unique immunological features of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious drug reaction that leads to a decrease in platelet count and a high risk of thrombosis. HIT patients produce pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies that bind to complexes of platelet factor‐4 (PF4) and heparin. HIT immune complexes crosslink Fc‐receptors resulting in platelet and monocyte activation. These events lead to the release of procoagulant chemokines and tissue factor, which together create an intensely prothrombotic state. HIT represents an atypical immune response because it has features of both T cell‐dependent and T cell‐independent mechanisms. The disorder is characterized by newly formed anti‐PF4/heparin IgG antibodies, which are characteristic of a T cell‐dependent mechanism; however, re‐exposure to heparin, months after HIT, does not lead to a memory response, which is consistent with a T cell‐independent mechanism. In this review, we discuss the immunobiological events that can explain these features, including the role for T cell‐dependent and T cell‐independent mechanisms in HIT antibody generation, the immunogenic characteristics of the PF4/heparin antigen, and the concept of a temporary loss in immune regulation contributing to the onset of HIT. We also present a novel immunobiological model to explain the atypical immune response that is characteristic of HIT.     

Affinity purification of heparin-dependent antibodies to platelet factor 4 developed in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: biological characteristics and effects on platelet activation

Antibodies to heparin platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) complexes were purified from the plasma of three patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) using affinity chromatography. From each plasma, the largest amount of antibodies was eluted with 2 M NaCl at pH 7.5 (peak 1) and the remainder was obtained using 0.1 M glycine/0. 5 M NaCl at pH 2.5 (peak 2). In an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we then showed that each patient had developed antibodies to PF4 displaying different characteristics. In patient 1, peak 1 IgG reacted almost exclusively with H-PF4 complexes, whereas peak 2 IgG had similar reactivity with PF4 whether or not heparin was present. Patient 2 expressed a mixture of IgA, IgM and IgG and both fractions bound to PF4 alone or to H-PF4 complexes. Finally, IgG in patient 3 only bound to H-PF4 and was unreactive with PF4 alone. Using [14C]-serotonin release assays, the antibodies developed in the three patients and exhibiting the strongest ability to activate platelets with heparin were those having the highest affinity to H-PF4. These results strongly support the hypothesis that HIT antibodies to PF4 are heterogeneous regarding their affinity and specificity for target antigens and this may greatly influence their ability to activate platelets and their pathogenicity.     

Use of systemic bivalirudin with catheter‐directed thrombolysis in a patient with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: A case report

In patients with submassive pulmonary embolism, the use of catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT), using low‐dose alteplase is associated with improvement in overall hemodynamics. The data for use of CDT in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia are limited. We report a case of CDT in a patient with HIT using bivalirudin anticoagulation. Data of the use of bivalirudin and argatroban for systemic anticoagulation with CDT are limited.     

Beneficial effect of exogenous platelet factor 4 for detecting pathogenic heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

The laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on an enzyme immunoassay combined with a functional test, and serotonin release assay (SRA) is the gold standard for detecting activating HIT antibodies. However, a recent atypical history of HIT prompted us to evaluate whether addition of platelet factor 4 (PF4) during SRA could improve its ability to detect pathogenic HIT antibodies. Using 5B9, a monoclonal antibody to PF4/H with a human Fc fragment, we first defined the optimal PF4 concentration for detecting low amounts of platelet‐activating IgG with SRA. Plasma samples from 50 patients with suspected HIT were then studied, and SRA was positive in 17 cases (Group SRA^pos), with relatively high levels of PF4‐specific IgG (median optical density = 2·66). SRA was also systematically performed after adding 10 μg/ml of PF4 in the reaction mixture, and significant serotonin release was measured with samples from 9 additional patients (Group PF4‐SRA^pos). Importantly, levels of PF4‐specific IgG were similar in these samples and those from the 24 persistently SRA negative patients. Moreover, the pre‐test probability of HIT was intermediate/high in all ‘SRA^pos’ or ‘SRA‐PF4^pos’ patients. In conclusion, addition of exogenous PF4 might improve the detection of pathogenic HIT antibodies by SRA.     

Evolving concepts of pathogenesis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune reaction to heparin. It often causes severe thrombosis which may lead to limb gangrene and thrombosis‐associated death. The concept of its pathogenesis has been evolving during the past five decades. Initially, HIT was thought to be caused by disseminated intravascular coagulation. Later it became clear that HIT was mediated by an immune mechanism whereby an IgG antibody induced platelet aggregation, release of procoagulant materials and consequently thrombus formation. The antigen comprises Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) and heparin which have a tendency to form ultralarge complexes. The HIT immune response has atypical features. IgG antibody appears early without IgM precedence and lasts transiently. One explanation is that there is prior priming by bacterial infection. Another unique characteristic is that it is processed as if it is a particulate antigen involving complement activation and B cells. Antigen‐presenting cells/monocytes are also involved but the role of T cells is controversial. Recent advances have provided new insights into the underlying mechanisms of HIT‐related thrombosis. Previously, platelets were believed to play a central role; their activation and consequently the induction of blood coagulation was the basis of the hypercoagulability in HIT. More recently, several studies have provided clear evidence that neutrophil and NETosis, monocytes and endothelial cells contribute significantly to the thrombosis in HIT. These new insights may result in development of better diagnostic laboratory assays and more effective treatments for HIT.     

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinical‐pathological disorder; thus, laboratory testing for the pathogenic platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies is central for diagnosis. The “iceberg” model summarizes the inter‐relationship between platelet activation assays and PF4‐dependent immunoassays, with platelet‐activating antibodies comprising a subset of anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies. The platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA), performed by reference laboratories, has high sensitivity and specificity for HIT (~95% each), and is especially suited for detecting highly pathogenic HIT sera containing both heparin‐dependent and heparin‐independent platelet‐activating antibodies; this latter subgroup of antibodies explains “autoimmune HIT” disorders (delayed‐onset, persisting, spontaneous, heparin “flush,” fondaparinux‐associated). Recently, SRA‐negative HIT has become recognized, in which serum from some HIT patients contains subthreshold levels of platelet‐activating antibodies (by SRA) that become detectable using a PF4‐enhanced platelet activation assay. Unusual immunologic features of HIT include early antibody detectability (at onset of platelet count fall) and antibody transience (seroreversion). Widely available PF4‐dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have high sensitivity but poor specificity for HIT, although specificity is enhanced with IgG‐specific EIAs and strong positive results; unfortunately, EIA results are usually not available in real time. Automated rapid immunoassays, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), facilitate real‐time laboratory diagnosis. Recently available likelihood ratio (LR) data for positive (LR+) and negative (LR?) test results allow clinicians to adjust their pretest probabilities for HIT, using Bayesian analysis, into real‐time posttest probabilities that are dramatically increased (test positive) or decreased (test negative). Moreover, (semi‐)quantitative CLIA‐ and LIA‐positive results (weak, moderate, strong positive) can further refine the posttest probability of HIT.     

Prospective evaluation of a rapid nanoparticle‐based lateral flow immunoassay (STic Expert® HIT) for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

A rapid lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) (STic Expert^® HIT), recently developed for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), was evaluated in a prospective multicentre cohort of 334 consecutive patients. The risk of HIT was estimated by the 4Ts score as low, intermediate and high in 28·7%, 61·7% and 9·6% of patients, respectively. Definite HIT was diagnosed in 40 patients (12·0%) with positive results on both enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (Asserachrom^® HPIA IgG) and serotonin release assay. The inter‐reader reproducibility of results obtained was excellent (kappa ratio > 0·9). The negative predictive value of LFIA with plasma samples was 99·6% with a negative likelihood ratio (LR) of 0·03, and was comparable to those of the particle gel immunoassay (H/PF4‐PaGIA^®) performed in 124 cases. Positive predictive value and positive LR were 44·4% and 5·87, respectively, and the results were similar for serum samples. The probability of HIT in intermediate risk patients decreased from 11·2% to 0·4% when the LFIA result was negative and increased to 42·5% when it was positive. In conclusion, the STic Expert^® HIT combined with the 4Ts score is a reliable tool to rule out the diagnosis of HIT.     

Timely diagnosis and management of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia in a frequent request,low incidence single centre using clinical 4T’s score and particle gel immunoassay

Clinicians must promptly decide which patients suspected of having heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) warrant a change in anticoagulation. This single‐centre series of 246 HIT testing referrals assessed the combination of clinical score (thrombocytopenia, timing, thrombosis, other causes of thrombocytopenia not evident; 4T’s), Diamed ID‐Heparin‐PF4 immunoassay (PaGIA) and 14C Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) to develop a practical and safe diagnostic strategy for HIT. A total of 142/256 (58%) referrals were in patients with a low 4T’s score, with 12/246 (5%) in the high scoring group. PaGIA was positive in 24/246 (9·7%) patients, whilst SRA was positive in 9/246 (3·6%). The overall positive predictive value of a positive PaGIA test alone was 37·5%, however this reached 80% for the high scoring group. Both negative PaGIA and low clinical score independently had negative predictive values of 100%. We subsequently developed an algorithm that, when applied to this cohort, would have resulted in 18/246 patients (7%) definitely requiring alternative anticoagulation, whilst a further 7/246 (2·8%) patients would have been considered on an individual basis. Ultimately (based on SRA) this would have resulted in 16/246 (6·5%) patients unnecessarily having a change in their anticoagulation, with 9/246 (3·6%) patients being ‘correctly treated’. The combination of 4T’s scoring and PaGIA permitted a practical and safe approach to rapid HIT diagnosis and management.