An open-label randomized controlled study of pegylated interferon/ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C with versus without fluvastatin

Summary. Pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN)/ribavirin combination therapy is the standard‐of‐care (SOC) treatment for chronic hepatitis C patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b and high viral load. The addition of fluvastatin to SOC treatment has been suggested to be effective for better outcome in retrospective pilot analyses. We investigated whether the combination of fluvastatin with PEG‐IFN/ribavirin could actually improve sustained viral response (SVR) in patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load. A randomized, open‐labeled, controlled study was conducted between July 2008 and December 2009 in 101 chronic hepatitis C patients allocated to PEG‐IFN/ribavirin combination therapy with or without fluvastatin. SVR rates were calculated in groups, stratifying host and viral factors. We also analyzed predictive factors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin with multivariate regression analysis. Rapid and early virological, and end of treatment response rates in the fluvastatin group were not significantly different from those in the non‐fluvastatin group. Notwithstanding, SVR rate was significantly higher in the fluvastatin group than in the non‐fluvastatin group (63.0%vs 41.7%, P = 0.0422). Comparison of the two groups stratifying demographic data and HCV characteristics showed significantly higher SVR rates to more than 80% in males, more than two mutations in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR), and a history of relapse among the fluvastatin group than the non‐fluvastatin group. Being male and major genotype IL28B single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were independent predictive factors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin with multivariate analysis. Fluvastatin‐combined with PEG‐IFN/ribavirin therapy significantly improves SVR rates in patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load. Male and major genotype IL28B SNPs were independent predictors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin combination therapy.     

Prediction of sustained response to low‐dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2b plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 1b and high hepatitis C virus level using viral reduction within 2 weeks after therapy initiation

Aim: Continuation of pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) plus ribavirin at the recommended dose is difficult in elderly patients and/or patients with cytopenia or complications. Whether the therapeutic efficacy of low‐dose PEG‐IFN plus ribavirin therapy could be predicted based on virological response within 2 weeks of therapy initiation was evaluated. Methods: A total of 106 patients with a high viral load of genotype‐1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) underwent low‐dose PEG‐IFN plus ribavirin therapy. PEG‐IFN alpha 2b (0.75 µg/kg per week) and ribavirin (600–800 mg/day) were administered for 48 weeks. Results: Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 37%, and treatment was discontinued in 9%. On univariate analysis of SVR‐contributing factors, significant differences were noted in the white blood cell count, platelet count, fibrosis markers, and viral reduction within 2 weeks from therapy initiation. On multivariate analysis, the platelet count and the reduction in the HCV core antigen level at week 2 were independent factors. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for SVR based on a 1‐log or greater HCV‐RNA level reduction at week 2 were 65% and 90%, respectively, and those based on HCV core antigen level at week 2 were 64% and 97%, respectively. PPV and NPV based on a 2‐log or greater reduction of the RNA level were 86% and 67%, respectively, and those based on the core antigen level were 93% and 69%, respectively. Conclusion: Evaluation of viral reduction at week 2 after therapy initiation is useful for predicting SVR to low‐dose PEG‐IFN plus ribavirin therapy.     

Comparison of a 6-month course peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in treating Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan

Previous studies in Caucasian patients showed treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon/ribavirin was well tolerated, and produced a higher response rate especially in genotype 1 infections. However, it is unknown whether this conclusion can be extrapolated to patients with Chinese ethnic origin. A total of 153 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive either weekly injection of peginterferon alpha-2b 1.5 mcg/kg plus oral ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day, depending on body weight) (PEG group, n = 76) or 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b t.i.w. plus ribavirin (IFN group, n = 77) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as the sustained disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment by polymerase chain reaction assay. Baseline demographic, viral and histological characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, HCV genotype 1 patients showed a significantly higher SVR in patients receiving PEG-IFN rather than IFN (65.8%vs 41.0%, P = 0.019), but no difference was found in genotype non-1 patients (PEG vs IFN: 68.4%vs 86.8%, P = 0.060). Genotype 1 patients (28.6%) in the PEG-IFN group relapsed, as compared with 52.9% in the IFN group (P = 0.040). Multivariate analyses showed early virological response at week 12 of therapy and genotype non-1 were significant predictors to SVR. As compared with the IFN group, patients receiving PEG-IFN had a significantly higher rate of discontinuation, dose reduction, fever, headache, insomnia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. In genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patient, PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin had significantly better SVR and lower relapse rate when compared to IFN/ribavirin. Both regimens can be recommended for genotype non-1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patients. However, a higher rate of adverse events and discontinuance of therapy were noted in patients treated with PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin.     

Twenty-four weeks of interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin for Japanese hepatitis C patients: sufficient treatment period for patients with genotype 2 but not for patients with genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA titer and HCV genotype are two major determinants of the outcome of interferon (IFN) monotherapy. To clarify the usefulness of combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin in Japanese hepatitis C patients, we treated patients with a relatively high dose of IFN in combination with ribavirin for 24 weeks and examined the effects in relation to the viral parameters. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled in the study. The patients received either 6 or 10 million units (MU) of interferon alpha-2b every day for 2 weeks and then three times a week for 22 weeks with a daily dose of either 600 or 800 mg of ribavirin. The treatment response and safety of this treatment were examined. RESULTS: The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 26.8% in genotype 1 and 76.5% in genotype 2 (P < 0.001), and 36.1% with the 6 MU group and 45.8% with the 10 MU group (P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis indicated that SVR was associated with genotype 2, HCV RNA <500 kilointernational unit/ml (kIU/ml), and HCV RNA undetectability at week 8 of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our current study showed that a 24-week course of IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy was effective with respect to virologic response in Japanese hepatitis C patients, particularly in patients with HCV genotype 2.     

Virological effects and safety of combined double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: In patients with chronic genotype 1b hepatitis C and a high viral load, the viral load was reduced by double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), followed by combined interferon and ribavirin therapy. The safety and virological effects of this treatment method were preliminarily investigated. METHODS: In nine patients with chronic hepatitis C, DFPP was performed three times on days 1, 2, and 4, and the administration of interferon and ribavirin was initiated immediately after DFPP on day 1. RESULT: The HCV RNA was undetectable in all patients after the plasma was passed through a plasma fractionator (second filter) in the DFPP circuit. After 2 weeks, the HCV RNA tended to decrease in the DFPP group more than in the control group (-2.45+/-1.12 versus -1.57+/-0.95, P=0.073). However, this decrease was not attributable to a sustained virological response (SVR) (22.2% versus 18.2%, P=0.822). Most of the adverse events were caused by the interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. CONCLUSION: DFPP can be safely performed concomitantly with interferon and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. The combination may contribute to an early virological response. The effect of DFPP on the SVR and its significance remain to be clarified.     

Triple therapy of interferon and ribavirin with zinc supplementation for patients with chronic hepatitis C： A randomized controlled clinical trial

AIM: To study the therapeutic effect of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin with zinc supplement on patients with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. METHODS: A total of 102 patients confirmed histologically to have chronic HCV infection with genotype 1b and more than 100 KIU/mL of HCV were randomly assigned to each arm of the study and each received 10 million units of pegylated interferon (IFN-alpha-2b) daily for 4 wk followed by the same dose every other day for 20 wk plus ribavirin (600 or 800 mg/d depending on body weight), with or without polaprezinc (150 mg/d) orally for 24 wk. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR) defined as negative HCV-RNA in the serum 6 mo after treatment. RESULTS: There were no differences in the clinical background between the two groups except for more females in the dual therapy group than in the other group (P<0.05). SVR was observed in 33.3% of the triple therapy group and 33.3% of the dual therapy group. The side effects were almost the same in both groups except for gastrointestinal symptoms, which were less in the triple therapy group (P=0.019). CONCLUSION: Considered together, triple therapy of zinc plus IFN and ribavirin for HCV infection patients with genotype 1b and high viral load is not better than dual therapy except for lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects.     

聚乙二醇干扰素仪-2α／2b联合利巴韦林复治慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效观察

目的探讨聚乙二醇干扰素α（PEG-IFNα）联合利巴韦林治疗复发慢性丙型肝炎（CHC）患者的应答情况及影响因素。方法 30例经IFN-α或PEG-IFNα标准RGT治疗后复发的CHC患者,均用PEG-IFNα-2a（180μg）或PEG-IFNα-2b（1.5μg/kg）联合利巴韦林（900 mg/d）再治疗,基因1型治疗48周,非基因1型治疗24周,停药随访24周,分析病毒基因型、基线HCV RNA载量、初治药物种类对联合治疗疗效的影响。结果 30例复发患者经联合再治疗后,24例（80%）获得持续病毒学应答（SVR）。18例低病毒载量（HCV RNA≤105拷贝/ml）患者中,17例（94.4%）获得SVR,与高病毒载量组（58.3%）差异有统计学意义（P=0.026）。基因1型组18例,其中14例（77.8%）获得SVR,与非基因1型组（83.3%）差异无统计学意义（P=1.000）。初治应用PEG-IFNα联合利巴韦林抗病毒的患者17例,其中13例（76.5%）经再治疗后获得SVR,与初治应用IFN-α抗病毒组（84.6%）无明显差异（P=0.672）。结论 PEG-IFNα联合利巴韦林治疗复发CHC患者的疗效较好。基线病毒载量高,再治疗效果差;病毒基因型及初治所采用的IFN类型与再治疗的疗效无显著相关性。     

Randomized trial of three different regimens for 24 weeks for re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients who failed to respond to interferon-alpha monotherapy in Taiwan.

With the favorable result of interferon (IFN)-ribavirin combination therapy for 24 weeks among naive Taiwanese chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, the optimal regimens of re-treatment for CHC patients who failed initial IFN monotherapy is not well-established. The study evaluated the effectiveness of re-treatment for 24 weeks with 3 different regimens and predictors for sustained virological response (SVR). METHODS: Total 120 Taiwanese CHC patients (81 males, 70 relapsers, mean age: 48.6 years) who failed initial IFN monotherapy were enrolled. They were assigned randomly (with a ratio of 1:1:2) to receive one of the three regimens for re-treatment for 24 weeks; group A: IFN 6 million units (MU) monotherapy (N=30), group B: combination therapy with ribavirin and IFN 3 MU (N=30) or group C: combination therapy with ribavirin and IFN 6 MU (N=60). The intention-to-treat rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 38.3%. The SVR rate in group C (53.3%) was significantly higher than group A (16.7%, P<0.005) and group B (30%, P<0.05). Drop-out rates were similar between the three groups. Patients achieving SVR had significant improvement histologically. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype non-1b infection, lower pretreatment HCV RNA levels, combined with ribavirin and with higher IFN dose, and relapsers were independent predictors for SVR. CONCLUSION: We concluded that more than one-third Taiwanese CHC patients achieved SVR after 24 weeks re-treatment and combination therapy, especially with higher dose of IFN, yielded higher efficacy.     

Enhanced efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha‐2a over pegylated interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4A randomized trial and quality of life analysis

Aim: The therapy of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 (HCV‐4) has not been optimized yet. This randomized, prospective, parallel‐group clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α‐2a (PEG‐IFN α‐2a) plus ribavirin and PEG‐IFN α‐2b plus ribavirin and assessed the health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with chronic HCV‐4. Methods: Eligible patients with proven chronic HCV‐4 were randomized to receive either a weekly dose of PEG‐IFN α‐2a (180 μg) or PEG‐IFN α‐2b (1.5 μg/kg) and a daily dose of ribavirin (1000–1200 mg) for 48 weeks with 24 weeks post‐treatment follow‐up. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) defined by undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment. The Short form‐36 Health Survey version 2 (SF‐36v2) and the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaires (CLDQ) were assessed before, during and after therapy. Results: The overall SVR rate of the entire cohort was 59.9%. The SVR rates were significantly higher in patients treated with PEG‐IFN α‐2a and ribavirin (Group A; n=109) compared with those treated with PEG‐IFN α‐2b and ribavirin (Group B; n=108, 70.6 vs. 54.6%, respectively; P=0.017). The relapse rates were 5.1% for PEG‐IFN α‐2a and 15.7% for PEG‐IFN α‐2b (P=0.0019). The SF‐36v2 and CLDQ were low during therapy and improved significantly after therapy successful therapy. Conclusion: Pegylated interferon α‐2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than PEG‐IFN α‐2b and ribavirin therapy in the treatment of chronic HCV‐4 patients. The tolerability and adverse events were comparable between the two regimens. The HRQOL improved significantly after successful PEG‐IFN α‐2a plus ribavirin therapy.     

A multicenter survey of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan

Aim: This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. Methods: One hundred and forty‐three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non‐response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re‐treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. Results: Twenty‐five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re‐treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re‐treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re‐treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin‐28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re‐treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re‐treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re‐treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re‐treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re‐treatment.     

Effect of treatment with interferon α-2b and ribavirin in patients infected with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus

Aim:  Nearly 20% of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are not curable, even by interferon (IFN)–ribavirin combination therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that determine the efficacy of combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.
Methods:  Fifty patients with CHC who underwent a treatment of 6 MU IFN α-2b with ribavirin for 24 weeks were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:  All the patients showed no serum HCV-RNA within 12 weeks after starting the therapy. Forty-one of the 50 patients (82%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). The age, sex, genotype (2a vs. 2b) and grade/stage of the liver by histopathology and pretreatment viral load werenot different between the sustained responders and relapsers. Univariate analysis showed that an earlier viral clearance from blood and a larger number of amino acid substitutions in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR) were predictors of SVR. Multivariate analysis showed that a large number of amino acid substitutions in the ISDR was a predictor of SVR.
Conclusion:  The characterization of the amino acid sequences of ISDR may be helpful for predicting a relapse after combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.     

Effect of treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in patients infected with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus.

Aim: Nearly 20% of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are not curable, even by interferon (IFN)-ribavirin combination therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that determine the efficacy of combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection. Methods: Fifty patients with CHC who underwent a treatment of 6 MU IFN alpha-2b with ribavirin for 24 weeks were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All the patients showed no serum HCV-RNA within 12 weeks after starting the therapy. Forty-one of the 50 patients (82%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). The age, sex, genotype (2a vs. 2b) and grade/stage of the liver by histopathology and pretreatment viral load werenot different between the sustained responders and relapsers. Univariate analysis showed that an earlier viral clearance from blood and a larger number of amino acid substitutions in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR) were predictors of SVR. Multivariate analysis showed that a large number of amino acid substitutions in the ISDR was a predictor of SVR. Conclusion: The characterization of the amino acid sequences of ISDR may be helpful for predicting a relapse after combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.     

Factors affecting efficacy in patients with genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C treated by pegylated interferon alpha‐2b and ribavirin: reducing drug doses has no impact on rapid and sustained virological responses

Summary. Reducing the dose of drug affects treatment efficacy in pegylated interferon (Peg‐IFN) and ribavirin combination therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of drug exposure, as well as the baseline factors and the virological response on the treatment efficacy for genotype 2 patients. Two‐hundred and fifty patients with genotype 2 HCV who were to undergo combination therapy for 24 weeks were included in the study, and 213 completed the treatment. Significantly more patients who achieved a rapid virological response (RVR), defined as HCV RNA negativity at week 4, achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) (92%, 122/133) compared with patients who failed to achieve RVR (48%, 38/80) (P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic‐regression analysis showed that only platelet counts [odds ratio (OR), 1.68; confidence interval (CI), 1.002–1.139] and RVR (OR, 11.251; CI, 5.184–24.419) were independently associated with SVR, with no correlation being found for the mean dose of Peg‐IFN and ribavirin for RVR and SVR. Furthermore, in the stratification analysis of the timing of viral clearance, neither mean dose of Peg‐IFN (P = 0.795) nor ribavirin (P = 0.649) affected SVR in each group. Among the patients with RVR, the lowest dose group of Peg‐IFN (0.77 ± 0.10 μg/kg/week) and ribavirin (6.9 ± 0.90 mg/kg/day) showed 100% and 94% of SVR. Hence, RVR served as an important treatment predictor, and drug exposure had no impact on both SVR and RVR in combination therapy for genotype 2 patients.     

Treatment effects and predictors of a 24-week course of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1b and a high viral load, the sustained virological response (SVR) rate remained as low as 2-3% with conventional interferon (IFN) monotherapy, but improved to more than 20% with IFN alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy. This study examined the therapeutic effects and predictors of this combination therapy. METHODS: Subjects were 105 patients with chronic hepatitis C (73 males, 32 females) with a median age of 53 years (range 19-70 years). Seventy-two patients had genotype lb and 33 patients had genotype 2 (2a or 2b). Six million units (MU) or 10 MU of IFN alpha-2b was administered by intramuscular injection six times a week for the first 2 weeks, and the same amount of IFN was administered three times a week for the following 22 weeks. During the IFN administration period, 600-800 mg of oral ribavirin was administered daily. Patients who were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA negative 24 weeks after the completion of administration were defined as SVR. RESULTS: The overall SVR rate was 39%; 22.2% for the genotype 1b group and 75.8% for the genotype 2 group, and the difference between the groups was significant (P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the factors that contributed to SVR include genotype 2, age (younger than 53 years), and an increase in Th2 measured by flow cytometry before and 4 weeks after start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The overall SVR rate of IFN alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy for 24 weeks was 39%, and contributing factors for SVR rate include genotype 2, age younger than 53 years and elevated Th2.     

Relapse of hepatitis C in a pegylated‐interferon‐α‐2b plus ribavirin‐treated sustained virological responder

A 41‐year‐old woman with chronic hepatitis C was treated with pegylated‐interferon (PEG‐IFN)‐α‐2b plus ribavirin for 24 weeks. She had hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2a (1600 KIU/mL), and her liver histology showed mild inflammation and fibrosis. Four weeks after the start of the therapy, she achieved a rapid virological response (RVR) and then a sustained virological response (SVR). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels remained within normal ranges and HCV RNA continued to be negative. However, ALT levels flared with the re‐emergence of HCV RNA in the serum 1.5 years after discontinuation of therapy. HCV RNA obtained from sera before therapy and after relapse shared a 98.6% homology with the E2 region, and phylogenetic analyses indicated that they were the same HCV strain. These results eliminated the possibility of a re‐infection and strongly indicated a late relapse of the disease. Therefore, follow‐up is necessary for chronic hepatitis C patients after SVR, even if they respond well to therapy, including RVR.     

Favorable factors for re-treatment with pegylated interferon α2a plus ribavirin in patients with high viral loads of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus

Aim: Effect of re‐treatment for pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) plus ribavirin was not fully evaluated. We examined the effects of re‐treatment with PEG‐IFN plus ribavirin in patients with high viral loads of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus who failed to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) with combination therapy. Methods: We examined 38 patients who were re‐treated with PEG‐IFN α2a plus ribavirin for more than 60 weeks, among whom 14 were non‐responders and 24 were relapsers after previous treatment with PEG‐IFN α2b plus ribavirin. IL28B genotyping was done in 21 patients. Results: The overall SVR rate was 34%. Analysis of baseline characteristics showed that the relapsers had a significantly higher SVR rate than the non‐responders (50.0%, 12/24 vs. 7.1%, 1/14, respectively, P = 0.012) The SVR rates of re‐treated patients who had turned hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA‐negative at weeks 8, 12, 24, and 48 of the previous therapy were 67% (4/6), 67% (4/6), 29% (2/7), and 25% (1/4), respectively. Re‐treatment achieved an SVR in five of 12 patients with IL28B major alleles and three of nine patients with IL28B minor alleles. During the re‐treatment, patients with complete viral suppression at week‐12 achieved a significantly higher SVR rate (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Re‐treatment with PEG‐IFN α2a plus ribavirin therapy is effective in patients who relapse after a course of PEG‐IFN α2b plus ribavirin therapy. Re‐treatment is a particularly useful option for patients who achieve early viral clearance during previous therapy.     

A study of low dose peginterferon alpha-2b with ribavirin for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to test the efficacy of low and standard doses of pegylated interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. By nature of its design the study also provided data on response to therapy over a spectrum of doses of both pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin calculated on a body weight basis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty micrograms of pegylated interferon alpha-2b or 100 microg for patients weighing<75 kg or 150 microg for patients>or=75 kg were administered weekly with 1000 mg ribavirin daily for 48 wk if serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA was undetectable after the first 24 wk of therapy. RESULTS: Overall sustained viral response (SVR) was 45% for standard dose and 33% for low dose, p=0.02. For genotypes 2 and 3 SVR was 65% for standard dose, and 56% for low dose, p=0.51. For genotype 1 SVR was 38% for standard dose, and 24% for low dose, p=0.03. For genotype 1 patients whose doses exceeded the 1-2-5 threshold, that is >or=1.25 microg/kg body weight pegylated interferon alpha-2b weekly and >or=12.5 mg/kg body weight ribavirin daily, SVR was 51%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study underscore the importance of adequate dosing of ribavirin as well as pegylated interferons in achieving an SVR when treating genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients with combination therapy.     

Clinical trial results of peginterferons in combination with ribavirin

Of the large number of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), only about one third have progressive liver disease, and will eventually develop cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These are the patients for whom effective antiviral treatment is most needed. Therapy is currently recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C who have abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, detectable hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) in the blood, and significant necroinflammatory changes and/or fibrosis on liver biopsy. The current gold standard in terms of treatment efficacy is the combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin. The overall sustained virological response rate (SVR) with these regimens is 54 to 61% following 48 weeks of therapy. Patients with genotype 1 infection have a 42 to 51% likelihood of response to 48 weeks of therapy. Those with genotypes 2 or 3 infection will respond to 24 weeks of therapy in 78 to 82% of cases. These SVR rates are 5 to 10 percentage points higher in all patient groups than in those obtained with standard doses of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin. Retreatment of nonresponders to standard IFN monotherapy using PEG-IFN and ribavirin has achieved SVR rates of 34 to 40%. Retreatment of patients who relapsed after IFN monotherapy has resulted in an SVR rate of about 60%. A SVR after retreatment of relapsers and nonresponders with PEG-IFN and ribavirin is more likely in patients previously treated with IFN monotherapy, those with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, patients with low viral load (<2 million copies/mL), and individuals who had a significant decrease in HCV RNA levels during the initial treatment. The potential benefits of long-term anti-HCV suppressive therapy in nonresponders are currently under investigation.     

Peginterferon alpha-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Japanese patients

Background: The efficacy and safety of peginterferon alpha‐2a (40 KD) (peg‐IFNα‐2a) plus ribavirin has not been reported for Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to evaluate this combination in treatment‐naïve patients and in non‐responders or relapsers to interferon monotherapy. Methods: Overall, 201 treatment‐naïve patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype‐1b were randomly assigned to 180 µg peg‐IFNα‐2a once‐weekly plus ribavirin 600–1000 mg/day or peg‐IFNα‐2a plus placebo for 48 weeks. Additionally, peg‐IFNα‐2a plus ribavirin was administered for 48 weeks to 100 non‐responders or relapsers (85% genotype‐1) to previous interferon monotherapy. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was attained among significantly more treatment‐naïve patients receiving combination therapy than monotherapy (61% vs 26%, P < 0.001). For patients with high baseline HCV RNA, the SVR rate was 59% with peg‐IFNα‐2a plus ribavirin versus 24% with peg‐IFNα‐2a monotherapy. Among non‐responders or relapsers to previous interferon monotherapy, 54% attained an SVR. Adverse events were generally mild, and discontinuations rates due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were low. Conclusion: In Japanese patients, peg‐IFNα‐2a plus ribavirin provided significant improvement in SVR rates compared with peg‐IFNα‐2a alone in treatment‐naïve patients, and was effective as re‐treatment for non‐responders or relapsers to previous treatment with interferon monotherapy.     

Simple formula to predict response to peginterferon alpha2b and ribavirin combination therapy in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients with high viral loads

Aim: We advocate a simple formula which can conveniently predict the outcome of Peg‐interferon (IFN) alpha2b and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CH‐C) with high viral load. Methods: A total of 338 (group A: 230, Group B: 108) genotype 1 CH‐C patients treated with Peg‐IFN alfa‐2b and RBV were enrolled. Clinical parameters differing significantly between sustained virological responders (SVRs) and non‐SVRs in group A were categorized, then a simple formula to predict SVR was constructed and re‐evaluated in group B. Another formula containing hepatitis C virus amino acid mutations/substitutions also was constructed. Results: In group A, gender and HCV RNA load <1000 KIU were significant predictors of SVR by multivariate logistic regression analysis. A simple formula was constructed (formula A): male gender (point 2) + HCV RNA load <1000 KIU (3) + platelet counts ≥15 × 10⁴ /mm³ (1) + age <60 (1). In group A, score (0–1) predicted SVR rate 23.8% (2–4): 48.1% and (5–7): 70.2%. According to this formula, score (0–1) predicted SVR rate 7.1% (2–4): 38.6%, and (5–7): 70.3% in group B. Information on HCV amino acid mutations/substitutions seemed to add some accuracy. Conclusions: This simple formula can be used to roughly determine, at the patients' first/second visit, the probability of response to Peg‐IFN alpha2b and RBV combination therapy for genotype 1 CH‐C with high viral load.