Proximal row carpectomy

Proximal row carpectomy has become an increasingly popular procedure in the treatment of arthritic disease of the proximal carpal row. Preoperative arthritis at the capitolunate articulation seems to be a relative contraindication. Care should be taken surgically to preserve all capsular ligaments. The majority of patients experience satisfactory pain relief, functional wrist motion, and effective grip strength.     

Proximal row carpectomy

In an era when surgical treatment of wrist disorders is becoming increasingly complex, proximal row carpectomy is still a reasonable salvage operation to consider in carefully selected patients. Realistic expectations should be understood by the surgeon and patient prior to the operation.     

Proximal row carpectomy

Excision of the proximal carpal row has proven over the past 60 years to be an effective technique for certain disorders of the wrist, including degenerative sequelae of scapholunate ligament dissociation and scaphoid nonunions, Kienböck disease, Preisser disease, and other fracture-dislocations of the wrist. The durability of this procedure may be due to remodeling of the capitate head to the lunate fossa. Poor results have been noted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and arthrogrypotic wrist deformities. Preservation of relatively normal cartilage of the capitate head as well as the lunate fossa is critical for success of this procedure. Average outcomes of this procedure include a wrist extension-flexion arc of 75° and grip strength of 60% of the uninvolved wrist. Revision to total wrist arthrodesis is required in 10% of patients. Approximately 90% have pain relief and can return to moderate use activity. Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand     

Proximal row carpectomy

Proximal row carpectomy is extremely useful as a wrist reconstructive technique for cases of degenerative joint arthritis of the radiocarpal joint cause by scapholunate advanced collapse, scapholunate advanced collapse, schaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations, lunate dislocations, and Kienb?ck disease. It should be selected with caution for patients younger than 35 years old. The procedure can be performed with or without temporary internal fixation with with Kirschner wires, and adjunctive techniques of dorsal capsule interposition, proximal capitate excision, and radial styloidectomy can be used. The longevity of the operation is good, but the patient should be informed preoperatively that secondary procedures may be required. Based on historical series, these procedures have included addition have included of radial styloidectomy when this has not been performed at the index procedure, revision of the surgery with capitate debridement or conversion to total wrist arthodesis. Conversion of proximal row carpectomy to total wrist arthoplasty with implants can be contemplated in selected patient particularly as newer implants are designed. The technique the senior author has used on occasion has been to perform revision surgery on those patients who have chronic pain who might need further debridement of the radius in the radial styloid, the proximal capitate, or evaluation of the integrity of the interposition.     

Proximal row carpectomy: a volar approach

We retrospectively evaluated 14 patients who underwent proximal row carpectomy through a volar, instead of the routine dorsal approach. The patients were screened for range of motion, grip strength, VAS pain score, and responded to a DASH questionnaire. At a mean follow-up of 16 months, range of motion and grip strength were satisfactory. The disability score was improved, however the pain score was slightly higher than the preoperative score. We conclude that proximal row carpectomy through a volar approach gives comparable results to those reported with the dorsal approach.     

Proximal row carpectomy: clinical evaluation

Proximal row carpectomy as a treatment of disorders of the radiocarpal joint remains controversial despite numerous reports documenting clinically successful outcomes. Criticism includes postoperative loss of grip strength, unsatisfactory range of motion, prolonged rehabilitation time, and the potential for progressive painful arthritis. Twenty-seven patients were studied to address these concerns. The average length of follow-up was 4 years. Postoperative pain relief was achieved in 26 patients, allowing 24 of the 27 patients to return to their previous activity status within an average of 4.5 months after surgery. In all cases, range of motion matched or surpassed preoperative values. Grip strength improved to an average of 80% of the contralateral side. A detailed radiographic analysis of the radii of curvature of the lunate fossa and the capitate showed that the radius of curvature of the capitate is approximately two thirds of the corresponding value of the lunate. Motion between the capitate and the radius is translational with a moving center of motion, which may dissipate load on the radius and explain the relative success of the procedure.     

Proximal row carpectomy: Long-term results

ObjectivesTo evaluate long-term clinical outcome of proximal carpectomy. Our assumption was that this intervention should result in long-term benefit, making a wrist painless, mobile, and functional, compatible with social and professional life, whatever the initial etiology of the degenerative wrist.MethodsWe report a continuous single centre retrospective series of 24 patients. Objective (mobility, strength, radiographic evaluation) and subjective (pain, subjective wrist value, functional scores) functions were assessed by an independent observer. Surgery was performed mainly for Kienbock's disease, scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists.ResultsThe follow-up lasted 116 months in average, during which pain was improved in all cases; 83% of the patients were satisfied with a mean score of 1.2 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and 76% subjective wrist value (SWV) (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand [DASH]: 31). Wrist flexion–extension arc averaged 76°, and the grip strength equivalent to 78% of the contralateral limb. Radiographic modification developed in 52% without any clinical impact. Three patients required arthrodesis and never felt comfortable with their carpectomy.ConclusionsOur study shows a long-term efficacy of proximal row carpectomy. This treatment must be considered in the therapeutic arsenal for a degenerative and painful wrist, and it should no longer be regarded as a salvage procedure. Advantages of this intervention are obvious: technical simplicity, short rehabilitation, immediate functionality of the wrist and few complications.     

Proximal row carpectomy in emergency

Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of early post-traumatic degenerative disease of the wrist. Much less frequently, PRC has been advocated as an emergency procedure for irreparable fracture-dislocation of the wrist. Our objective was to compare the results of PRC in patients having undergone this procedure in the two contexts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical and radiographic results of six patients treated by emergency PRC as compared to six patients who underwent elective PRC. The mean follow-up was 36 months. Both the patient's satisfaction and the grasp of the wrist joint were significantly better in patients who underwent PRC emergency as compared to those having undergone elective PRC. Quick DASH score, radiographic results, and return to work were also more favourable in these patients, but the difference between the two groups was not significant. This study confirms that PRC is a valuable salvage technique indicated in early posttraumatic wrist collapse. Moreover, when performed in emergency, the procedure shows even better subjective and objective results, allowing a majority of patients to return to their previous job.     

Proximal row carpectomy: a motion-preserving procedure in the treatment of advanced Kienbock's disease

Kienbock's disease is an isolated disorder of the lunate bone resulting from vascular compromise to the bone. In stage IV, degenerative changes are present at the midcarpal joint, the radiocarpal joint, or both. The goal of proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is the creation of a new joint between the capitate and the radius. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the functional outcome after PRC in late stage Kienbock's disease. The evaluation included assessment of range of motion, grip strength, and pain reduction. Twelve wrists in 12 patients underwent proximal row carpectomy for the treatment of stage IV Kienbock's disease between 2002 and 2005. Objective and subjective function was assessed. The average length of follow-up was 2 years (range, 9 months to 4 years). There was one failure (8.3%) requiring fusion at three years. The eleven wrists that did not fail (91.7%) had an average flexion-extension are of 70 degrees, associated with an average grip strength of 80% of the contralateral side; all patients were very satisfied. The patients rated nine wrists as not painful, two as mildly painful, and one as moderately painful. Radiographs revealed reduced radiocapitate space in five and complete loss of the space in one. With the numbers available, there was no significant association between loss of joint space seen on radiographs and subjective and objective function. Overall, proximal row carpectomy had maintained a satisfactory range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief, and all twelve patients with Kienbock's disease, except one, were satisfied with the results and returned to their previous occupations. Caution should be exercised in performing the procedure in a young, heavy manual working patient.     

Proximal row carpectomy: a minimum 10-year follow-up study

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term clinical and radiographic results after a proximal row carpectomy (PRC). METHODS: Twenty patients with various degenerative and posttraumatic disorders of the wrist were evaluated. The evaluation consisted of a physical examination, plain radiographs, and completion of a questionnaire that assessed patient satisfaction, return to work status, occupational and recreational activities and restrictions, and pain level. RESULTS: Two patients (10%) had persistent pain after a PRC requiring a radiocapitate arthrodesis. The remaining 18 patients were evaluated at an average follow-up of 13.1 years (range, 10.0-17.2 y). The average wrist range of motion was 63% and the average maximal grip strength was 83% of the opposite extremity, respectively. Seventeen patients were satisfied with their outcome. One patient complained of persistent pain and was not satisfied but did not want further surgery. All but 2 patients returned to their original occupation and activity level including all 5 patients involved in workers' compensation. Follow-up radiographs showed flattening of the proximal capitate in 6 patients. Radiocapitate arthrosis was absent/minimal in 13 patients and moderate/severe in 4 patients. The presence of radiographic changes did not correlate with patient satisfaction or degree of wrist pain. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal row carpectomy is a dependable and durable procedure that results in satisfactory pain relief in the majority of patients, maintenance of functional wrist motion and grip strength, high patient satisfaction, and ability to return to work. Progressive symptomatic deterioration of the radiocapitate articulation was not observed.     

Proximal row carpectomy in arthrogrypotic wrist deformity

We studied five patients who had proximal row carpectomy for the correction of wrist deformity secondary to arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Three patients subsequently had wrist arthrodesis for recurrent or persistent deformity. We analyzed those factors we thought might influence the final result, including age at time of surgery, adequacy of correction of deformity, position of immobilization, and duration of immobilization. We concluded that despite attention to the details of intraoperative correction of deformity and postoperative immobilization, the results are unpredictable.     

Proximal row carpectomy in advanced Kienbock's disease

This retrospective study assessed the outcomes of 21 patients (16 male and 5 female, mean age 39 years) with advanced Kienbock's disease treated by resection of the proximal carpal row. They were clinically reviewed. The mean follow-up was 67 months, with all but two patients having had a follow-up of 2 years. No or mild pain was being experienced by 13 patients, moderate pain by 3 and severe pain by 5. Grip strength increased from 19 kg pre-operatively to 26 kg postoperatively (or 65% of the normal contralateral side). There was a slight increase of mobility. The DASH score was 22 points (range 0-78) and the Patient Rated Wrist Score (PRWS) was 30 points (range 0-84). Two patients developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome which was ongoing at the time of review and one developed a superficial wound infection. Proximal carpal row resection arthroplasty gave satisfactory results in patients with advanced Kienbock's disease.     

Proximal row carpectomy in perilunate dislocations and lunatomalacia

Proximal row carpectomy was performed in 13 wrists with old unreduced perilunate dislocations and in 4 wrists with Kienb?ck's disease. One failure was converted to wrist arthrodesis, and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 14 patients were reexamined after 11 (3-19) years. Average ranges of wrist motion were 37 degrees of dorsiflexion, 30 degrees of palmar flexion, 5 degrees of radial deviation, and 24 degrees of ulnar deviation. Grip strength averaged two thirds of the uninvolved hand. Pain relief was achieved in 12 patients, who all returned to their previous occupations. The results according to Cooney's criteria were 1 good, 8 fair, and 5 poor.     

Proximal row carpectomy for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion.

Nonunion of the scaphoid bone may occur even with early diagnosis of fracture and modern internal fixation techniques. A pattern of degenerative instability termed scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse may lead to collapse of the carpus with irreversible articular damage initially isolated to the radiostyloid joint. Proximal row carpectomy (PRC), which removes the intercalary proximal row and creates a radiocapitate articulation, is a motion preserving salvage procedure which unloads the areas of articular pathology, and creates a new articulation that allows motion and is able to bear compressive forces over time. Although results of PRC specifically for scaphoid nonunion are clearly not reported in the article, several studies demonstrate that PRC provides a pain relieving and motion-sparing salvage option particularly suited for this condition.     

Proximal row carpectomy with muscle transfers for spastic paralysis.

Fourteen patients with spastic paralysis from various causes (eight with cerebral palsy) who needed minimal two handed activities to assist in self-care and who desired improvement in appearance were treated by proximal row carpectomy. In twelve transfer of flexor carpi ulnaris to extensor carpi radialis brevis was done, and in two the extensors of the wrist were shortened. Various other procedures were done in some patients. Prolonged splinting was carried out. Better extension of the wrist was obtained and supination improved more when the transfer was subcutaneous around the ulnar border than when through the interosseus membrane. Less tendency for the carpus to displace ulnarward was seen when the distal half of the scaphoid was not removed. Strength of grasp and pinch improved, but ability to release objects was diminished due to the more dorsiflexed position of the wrist. Subjective use for two handed activities was improved and the patients were satisfied with the appearance.     

Functional results after proximal row carpectomy to salvage a wrist

Proximal row carpectomy is a movement-preserving procedure in the treatment of arthrosis of the wrist. We have retrospectively assessed the objective and subjective functional results after proximal row carpectomy. Assessment of outcome included measurement of range of movement (ROM), grip strength and self-assessment of pain relief with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results were graded using the Mayo and Krimmer wrist scores. Fourty-five patients (mean age 48 (30–67) years) were evaluated with a follow-up of 32 (8–115) months. Underlying conditions included: degenerative arthritis secondary to scapholunate advanced collapse deformity, or chronic scaphoid non-union (n=35), Kienböck disease stage III (n=4), chronic perilunate dislocation and fracture-dislocation (n=4), avascular necrosis of the scaphoid (n=1), and severe radiocarpal arthrosis secondary to distal radial fracture (n=1). Active ROM for wrist extension and flexion was 70° and mean radial and ulnar deviation 30.8°. Grip strength was 51% of the unaffected side. The average DASH score was 26. The intensity of the pain, measured by VAS, was reduced by 44% after strenuous activities and by 71% at rest. The Mayo and Krimmer wrist scores were 55 and 62 points indicating good results; 32 patients returned to work and 25 patients to their former occupation. Our results show that proximal row carpectomy is a technically easy operation that preserves a satisfying ROM and pain relief, and is recommended when the head of the capitate and the lunate fossa are not affected by arthrosis.     

Proximal row carpectomy with or without postoperative immobilisation

Previously published reports have shown good results after proximal row carpectomy in all cases that had a postoperative immobilisation period from 1 to 4 weeks. Immobilisation is thought to be necessary because of the risk of postoperative subluxation of the carpus and for pain relief. There is, however, no evidence of its value. The results in 13 patients who underwent proximal row carpectomy without postoperative immobilisation were compared with those in 25 patients who underwent proximal row carpectomy with postoperative immobilisation for 4 weeks. After a mean follow-up period of 27 months, no significant differences were found for pain, range of motion or return to work between the two groups. We conclude that postoperative immobilisation is not necessary after proximal row carpectomy.     

Proximal row carpectomy for chronic unreduced perilunate dislocations

We evaluated the results of proximal row carpectomy (PRC) for unreduced perilunate dislocation in 6 patients. The average period from the injury to the operation was 24 weeks. The modified Mayo wrist score was used for clinical evaluation. Radiological evaluation was based on the radius-capitate alignment. Pain disappeared in 4 cases; mild pain during activity persisted in 2 cases. The average flexion-extension are was 59% of the values on the unaffected side. The average grip strength was 72% of the unaffected side, and the average modified Mayo wrist score was 71 points. Three patients showed favourable radius-capitate alignment, while the other 3 patients showed poor radius-capitate alignment on the radiographs. The postoperative radius-capitate alignment was related to the preoperative position of the capitate on the lateral view. Those with poor radius-capitate alignment tended to obtain lower scores compared to those with favourable alignment.