Interictal and ictal magnetoencephalographic study in patients with medial frontal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetoencephalography (MEG) has any clinical value for the analysis of seizure discharges in patients with medial frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE). METHODS: Four patients were studied with 74-channel MEG. Interictal and ictal electroencephalographic (EEG) and MEG recordings were obtained. The equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of the MEG spikes were calculated. RESULTS: In two patients with postural seizures, interictal EEG spikes occurred at Cz or Fz. The ECDs of interictal MEG spikes were localized around the supplementary motor area. In the other two patients with focal motor or oculomotor seizures, interictal EEG spikes occurred at Fz or Cz. The ECDs of interictal MEG spikes were localized at the top of the medial frontal region. The ECDs detected at MEG ictal onset were also localized in the same area as those of the interictal discharges. CONCLUSIONS: In medial FLE patients, interictal and ictal MEG indicated consistent ECD localization that corresponded to the semiology of clinical seizures. Our findings demonstrate that MEG is a useful tool for detecting epileptogenic focus.     

Magnetoencephalography in partial epilepsy: Clinical yield and localization accuracy

The goals of this study were to determine (1) the yield of magnetoencephalography (MEG) according to epilepsy type, (2) if MEG spike sources colocalize with focal epileptogenic pathology, and (3) if MEG can identify the epileptogenic zone when scalp ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fail to localize it. Twenty-two patients with mesial temporal (10 patients), neocortical temporal (3 patients), and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (9 patients) were studied. A 37-channel biomagnetometer was used for simultaneously recording MEG with EEG. During the typical 2–3–hour MEG recording session, interictal epileptiform activity was observed in 16 of 22 patients. MEG localization yield was greater in patients with neocortical epilepsy (92%) than in those with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (50%). In 5 of 6 patients with focal epileptogenic pathology, MEG spike sources were colocalized with the lesions. In 11 of 12 patients with nonlocalizing (ambiguous abnormalities or normal) MRI, MEG spike sources were localized in the region of the epileptogenic zone as ultimately defined by all clinical and EEG information (including intracranial EEG). In conclusion, MEG can reliably localize sources of spike discharges in patients with temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy. MEG sometimes provides noninvasive localization data that are not otherwise available with MRI or conventional scalp ictal EEG.     

Startle epilepsy associated with gait-induced seizures: Pathomechanism analysis using EEG, MEG, and PET studies

We describe herein a girl who has had startle-induced seizures since she was 3 years old. These seizures were refractory to antiepileptic medications and worsened when the patient was 9 years old, following termination of phenytoin administration because of adverse effects. During this period she could walk only a few steps with support, and sudden drop attacks inevitably occurred. Interictal electroencephalography (EEG) revealed abundant spike–wave activity at the centroparietal midline areas, and ictal EEG of poststartle and gait-induced seizures revealed initial voltage attenuation followed by recruitment of vertex activity, which preceded a tonic or myoclonic–atonic phase. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results were unremarkable, but magnetoencephalography (MEG) and positron emission tomography (PET) suggested the presence of an extensive epileptogenic zone in the bilateral pericentral gyri, and the bilateral paracentral and left precuneus lobules, including the primary motor, supplementary motor, and supplementary sensory areas. The pathophysiologic significance of these structures is discussed.     

Use of magnetoencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy patients.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is used twofold for presurgical evaluation of patients with medically intractable partial epilepsy; to identify epileptogenic focus and to investigate functions of cortical areas at or near the epileptogenic focus or structural lesion. For the precise localization of the current source of epileptic discharge, the question as to whether MEG is superior to electroencephalography (EEG) is often addressed. To answer this question, so many factors, both biologically and technically related, have to be taken into consideration. The biological factors include the magnitude of epileptic discharge, its distribution over the cortex, depth of its source from the head surface, and the proportion of large pyramidal neurons tangentially oriented with respect to the head surface within the cortical area. The technical factors include the quality of the recording instrument such as the number of sensors and the use of gradiometer vs. magnetometer, the employed method of source analysis, and availability of experts in each institute. As far as the importance of ictal recording is emphasized, long-term video/EEG monitoring is of utmost importance. Thus, it is concluded that, once the epileptogenic focus is identified by the video/EEG monitoring, then MEG is superior to EEG in order to precisely localize the current source of the interictal epileptic discharge. Another question often addressed is whether MEG can replace the invasive intracranial EEG recording or not. In addition to the above-described factors, different coverage of the cortical areas by MEG vs. invasive intracranial EEG recording has to be taken into account to explain some of the recent reports related to this question. MEG can be effectively applied to the investigation of cortical functions near the epileptogenic focus. It is especially so when combined with other non-invasive studies like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In addition to the source analysis of magnetic fields related to various events or tasks, analysis of the task-related change of rhythmic cortical oscillations is a useful tool for studying higher cortical functions such as language in the presurgical evaluation.     

A Comparison of Magnetoencephalography, MRI, and V-EEG in Patients Evaluated for Epilepsy Surgery

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and relative contribution of several diagnostic methods [ictal and interictal scalp and intracranial EEG, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetoencephalography (MEG)] in identifying the epileptogenic zone for resection. METHODS: This was a prospective study using a masked comparison-to-criterion standard. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with refractory partial epilepsy from two university comprehensive epilepsy programs were studied. Patients who were evaluated for and underwent epilepsy surgery were recruited. The main outcome measure was the efficacy of each diagnostic method to identify the resected epileptogenic zone, when referenced to surgical outcome. RESULTS: MEG (52%) was second only to ictal intracranial V-EEG in predicting the epileptogenic zone for the entire group of patients who had an excellent surgical outcome (seizure free or rare seizure). In a subanalysis, for patients who had temporal lobe surgery, this same relation was seen (MEG, 57%, ictal intracranial V-EEG, 62%). With extratemporal resection, ictal (81%) and interictal (75%) intracranial EEG were superior to MEG (44%) in predicting the surgery site in those patients with an excellent outcome. Finally, for all patients who had a good surgical outcome, MEG (52%) was better than ictal (33%) or interictal (45%) scalp VEEG in predicting the site of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that MEG is a very promising diagnostic method and raise the possibility that it may obviate the need for invasive EEG in some cases or reduce the length of scalp EEG evaluation in others.     

Complementary use of video-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in frontal lobe epilepsy

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare magnetoencephalography (MEG) and video-electroencephalography (VEEG) source localization in frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) and determine if these methods can be complementary to each other in clinical practice.MethodThirty patients with pharmaco-resistant FLE who underwent epilepsy surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Video EEG was recorded using an IT-med system using 10/20 system. Regional localization of spikes in VEEG was defined as spikes discharged from adjacent electrodes and no further propagation to a large and/or contralateral area. Magnetoencephalography was recorded for the purpose of focus assessment. Magnetoencephalography spikes were detected for dipole localization of the epileptogenic cortex and the epileptogenic area was classified as mono- or multi-focal.ResultsRegional spike discharges were identified in the interictal VEEG of 20 patients and in the ictal VEEG of 17 patients. Thirteen patients had regional spikes in both interictal and ictal VEEG. Mono-focal localization was identified in the MEG of 20 patients. Fourteen of these patients had regional spike discharges in VEEG. In the remaining six patients, sources localization was only identified by MEG and there were no regional spike discharges either interictal or ictal VEEG.ConclusionIn clinical practice, VEEG is the routine procedure in the presurgical evaluation of FLE. However, we found six cases in which VEEG failed to locate the epileptogenic area that was identified by MEG. We therefore propose that combining VEEG and MEG will optimize the noninvasive presurgical evaluation of epileptiform activities in FLE.     

Characterizing magnetoencephalographic spike sources in children with tuberous sclerosis complex

PURPOSE: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) often causes medically intractable seizures. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) localizes epileptiform discharges. To evaluate the use of MEG spike sources (MEGSSs) for localizing epileptic zones in TSC patients, we characterized MEGSSs and correlated them to EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. METHODS: We analyzed data from seven children who underwent prolonged video-EEG, MEG, and MRI. We classified MEGSSs as clusters (six or more spike sources, 1 cm between sources regardless of number of sources). RESULTS: A single, unilateral cluster with additional scatters occurred in two patients; these predominantly lateralized dipoles correlated to prominent tubers on MRI and ictal/interictal EEG zones. Bilateral clusters with scatters existed in two patients; cluster locations partly overlapped multiple prominent tubers. These patients also had bilateral or diffuse interictal discharges, bilateral or generalized seizures, and changing seizure types and EEG findings. Only bilateral scatters occurred in three patients; scatters partly overlapped EEG interictal/ictal-onset regions; one patient had coexisting generalized seizures. In one patient with equally bilateral scatters, scatters overlapped a prominent tuber and interictal/ictal-onset zones in the right frontal region. CONCLUSIONS: MEG contributes to information from EEG and MRI for localizing epileptogenic zones in children with TSC. A single cluster with scatters in a unilateral hemisphere predicts a primary epileptogenic zone or hemisphere; bilateral or multiple clusters indicate bilateral primary or potential epileptogenic zones; and bilateral scatters without clusters may indicate epileptogenic zones that are hidden within extensive areas of scattered MEGSSs.     

Ictal MEG in two children with partial seizures

We report on the successful identification of epileptic foci in two children with partial epilepsy using ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG). Case 1 is a 12-year-old male suffering with simple partial seizures with leftwards nystagmus. Ictal SPECT revealed a hyperperfusion area in the right lateral occipital area, and MRI revealed cortical dysplasia in the same area. Interictal EEG dipoles were concentrated in the right mesial occipital lobe. Both interictal and ictal MEG dipoles were concentrated in the right mesial occipital lobe, which corresponded well with neuroimaging data and his clinical features. Case 2 is a 5-year-old female suffering with simple partial seizures with left-side facial twitching. Interictal EEG dipoles were located in her left motor area, the pre-sylvian fissure, close to the location of the interictal MEG-estimated dipoles. Ictal EEGs showed no remarkable changes associated with her clinical manifestations. However, ictal MEG showed high-voltage slow waves over her left hemisphere, and ictal MEG iso-contour maps revealed a clear dipolar pattern, which suggested that the MEG dipole was located in the area of the sylvian fissure. Ictal SPECT revealed hyperperfusion areas around the left sylvian fissure. Conclusion: Ictal MEG is useful for determining the precise location of epileptic focus in patients with motionless seizures, including children.     

The correlation between ictal semiology and magnetoencephalographic localization in frontal lobe epilepsy

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of ictal semiology with localization and/or lateralization by magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Methods

Seven patients from the Neurology Department of the University Hospital Erlangen who underwent resective surgery for frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) with an Engel 1a outcome were investigated retrospectively. MEG localizations were classified according to five compartments (separate or combined) of the frontal lobe: frontal basal (FB), frontal lateral (FL), frontal polar (FP), frontal mesial (FM), and frontal precentral (FPr). On the basis of previous studies that investigated the value of ictal semiology in localization and lateralization, we compared the experiential localization and/or lateralization of the epileptogenic region deduced from ictal semiology, that is, both seizure history and ictal video/EEG monitoring, with MEG localization.

Results

It is easier to determine lateralization than localization from ictal semiology because of the variety of signs and fast propagation in FLE. All of the patients had specific MEG localizations according to favorable postoperative outcome. Three patients had MEG foci associated with ictal semiology; in another four, the MEG localization was adjacent to the estimated area suggested by ictal semiology. Head version signs could be observed in all compartments of the frontal lobe: clonic in FB and FP areas; postural in FPr, FL, and FM areas; hypermotor in FB, FP, FPr, and FM areas; sensation aura in FB, FL, and FM areas; and automatisms in FP, FPr, and FL areas. All patients had concordant lateralizing and limited valuable locating information from ictal semiology, but no complete correlation with MEG foci.

Conclusion

Ictal semiology may indicate the involvement of a symptomatogenic brain region during a seizure, but extent of seizure onset in central motor or sensorimotor area is not reliable enough to indicate the seizure onset zone and favorable postoperative outcome in FLE. MEG provided specific localization of epileptic activity in a FLE compartment, and indicated the relationship between epileptogenic region and lesion. MEG can complement ictal semiology in establishing a noninvasive focal localization hypothesis.     

Inhibitory motor seizures: correlation with centroparietal structural and functional abnormalities

Six adults and 2 children with focal inhibitory motor seizures (ictal paralysis) were evaluated during a 4-year period. Paresthesias at seizure onset occurred during some seizures in all patients, and focal clonic activity followed paralysis in 4. EEG-CCTV recordings of the seizures in 2 patients showed that ictal paralysis coincided with an ictal discharge starting in one centroparietal area. MRI showed centroparietal structural lesions in six patients. One patient with a normal MRI scan had right centroparietal hypometabolism on PET. Inhibitory motor seizures must be differentiated from transient ischemic attacks and migraine. In our patients a centroparietal epileptogenic focus was suggested by neuroimaging studies, and in 2 instances by ictal EEG.     

Ictal and Interictal Activity in Partial Epilepsy Recorded with Multichannel Magnetoelectroencephalography: Correlation of Electroencephalography/Electrocorticography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, and Positron Emission Tomography Findings

Ictal and interictal epileptic activity was recorded for the first time by multichannel magnetoencephalography (MEG) in three patients with partial epilepsy. Pre- and intra-operative localization of the epileptogenic region was compared. The interictal epileptic activity was localized at the same region of the temporal or frontal lobe as the ictal activity. Main zones of ictal activity were shown to evolve from the tissue at the centers of interictal activity. Pre- and intra-operative electrocorticography (ECoG) as well as postoperative outcome confirmed localization in the temporal and frontal lobe. Results also correlated with findings from scalp EEG, interictal and ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Combined multichannel MEG/EEG recording permitted dipole localization of interictal and ictal activity.     

Spindle frequency activity may provide lateralizing information in drug-resistant nocturnal mesial frontal lobe epilepsy: A pilot study on the contribution of sleep recordings

PurposeNocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (NFLE) is characterized by sleep-related paroxysmal motor attacks occurring almost exclusively during non-REM sleep. Surgical treatment may relieve symptoms in drug-resistant patients. However, the identification of the epileptogenic zone, the region to be resected, is frequently challenging because of the absence of lateralizing and localizing information and the lack of informative EEG correlates. The aim of this study was to find asymmetries in the ictal activity that could provide information on the lateralization of the epileptogenic zone.MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the sleep EEG of four patients recorded prior to surgical intervention. The epileptogenic zone was known, as these patients had subsequently undergone successful surgery after bilateral intracerebral stereo-EEG investigation. Sleep EEG during the ictal phase was compared with sleep EEG during the pre-ictal phase.ResultsIn all patients, electrical sources of sigma activity (12–16 Hz) exhibited increased activity during the ictal phase which was higher in the epileptogenic hemisphere. Conversely, increased delta activity (1–4 Hz) was predominant contralateral to the epileptogenic focus in three of four patients.ConclusionSigma activity may have a predictive role in the lateralization of the epileptogenic zone and be useful during the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with NFLE.     

Epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis: the Dutch experience.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is drug resistant in more than half of the patients. Epilepsy surgery may be an alternative treatment option, if the epileptogenic tuber can be identified reliably and if seizure reduction is not at the expense of cognitive or other functions. We report the pre-surgical identification of the epileptogenic tuber and post-surgical outcome of patients with TSC in The Netherlands. METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent the pre-surgical evaluation of the Dutch Comprehensive Epilepsy Surgery Programme, including a detailed seizure history, interictal and ictal video EEG registrations, 3D FLAIR MRI scans and neuropsychological testing. Suitability of the candidates was decided in consensus. Seizure outcome, scored with the Engel classification, and cognition were reassessed at fixed post-surgery intervals. RESULTS: Epilepsy surgery was performed in six patients. At follow-up, four patients had Engel classification 1, two had classification 4. Improved development and behaviour was perceived by the parents of two patients. Epilepsy surgery was not performed in 19 patients because seizures were not captured, ictal onset zones could not be localised or were multiple, interictal EEG, video EEG and MEG results were not concordant, or seizure burden had diminished during decision making. A higher cognition index was found in the surgical patients compared to the non-surgical candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Epilepsy surgery can be performed safely and successfully in patients in whom semiology, interictal EEG, ictal EEG, MEG and the location of tubers are concordant. In other cases the risk of surgery should be weighed against the chance of seizure relief and in case of children subsequent impact on neurodevelopment.     

Efficacy of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Treatment of Intractable Epilepsy

Purpose : The ictal EEG and magnetoencephalogram (MEG) for gelastic seizures were recorded in a 4-year-old girl with tuberous sclerosis. The sites of origin for the seizure activities were investigated by using an equivalent current dipole (ECD) with the MEG.
Methods : EEG and MEG were recorded simultaneously under the administration of diazepam (DZP). The MEG recording was performed on a system consisting of an array of 64 sensors uniformly distributed over the patient's whole head (CTF, Canada), and the estimated ECDs were superimposed on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images (Siemens, 1.5 Tesla).
Results : Two laughing attacks lasting 5 s each were documented. The ictal EEG showed gradually increasing 11–Hz rhythmic α activities with dominance over the frontocentral areas bilaterally, followed by irregular spike-and-wave discharges. The ictal MEG detected bilateral frontal rhythmic sharp waves before the appearance of the activities on the EEG. The estimated ECDs were localized in the deep white matter of the right frontal lobe on the MRI. However, those dipoles did not coincide with the locations of her cortical tubers.
Conclusions : Although gelastic seizures accompanied with hypothalamic hamartomas are well known, several reports have suggested a temporal or frontal lobe origin for gelastic seizures. In this patient, the ECD indicated that the seizures originated in the frontal lobe, although ictal scalp EEG recordings could not determine the precise focus. Thus, in cases in which the use of ictal scalp EEG fails to show the sites of origin for the seizures, it is recommended that the origins be estimated by using the non-invasive method of ictal MEG analysis.     

Ictal onset localization of epileptic seizures by magnetoencephalography

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to localize the ictal onset zone of focal epileptic seizures by magnetoencephalography (MEG) and to compare the results with interictal MEG localizations, ictal and interictal electroencephalography (EEG) results and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in epilepsy surgery candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 13 patients with partial seizures during MEG recording were analysed. Measurements were performed with a Magnes II dual unit system. RESULTS: In six of 13 cases, the ictal onset zone could be localized by MEG, with all interictal MEG findings being confirmed by ictal MEG results. In four cases, the ictal MEG localization results were corresponding to the ictal EEG localization results. In two cases, EEG yielded no comparable information. CONCLUSION: Ictal onset localization is feasible with MEG. Both interical and ictal MEG contribute valuable information to the presurgical assessment of epilepsy patients.     

Cephalic auras of supplementary motor area origin: an ictal MEG and SAM(g2) study

Although a nonspecific cephalic sensation, the so-called "cephalic aura," is a common sensory aura, particularly in frontal lobe seizures, but is rarely is the entire sensory seizure event. The unusual presentation of cephalic sensations in isolation representing supplementary motor area (SMA) seizures, which are commonly unaccompanied by ictal electroencephalography (EEG) changes, can easily lead to misdiagnosis of nonepileptic psychogenic seizures. We illustrate the case of a 36-year-old male patient with frontal lobe epilepsy who presented with isolated cephalic auras described as a nonvertiginous sense of head movement without observable clinical signs after his habitual partial motor seizures were controlled with pharmacotherapy. Video/EEG recordings showed no recognizable epileptic discharges time-locked to the onset of the isolated cephalic auras. Ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) with synthetic aperture magnetometry-kurtosis (SAM(g(2))) analysis demonstrated the SMA onset of the cephalic auras; thus, MEG was essential in differentiating these isolated auras from nonepileptic psychogenic events.     

Identifying the primary epileptogenic hemisphere from electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic dipole lateralizations in children with intractable epilepsy

We used electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic dipole lateralizations to identify the primary epileptogenic hemisphere in 41 children with intractable localization-related epilepsy. We compared EEG and magnetoencephalographic dipole lateralizations, EEG ictal onsets, and magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Concordant lateralization of EEG and magnetoencephalographic dipoles (> 50% of each lateralizing to the same hemisphere) occurred in 34 patients, with EEG ictal onsets in the same hemisphere in 23 (68%) and concordant MRI lesions in 23 (68%). Focal resection in 16 of 20 patients resulted in a good surgical outcome. Of the seven children with nonconcordant magnetoencephalographic and EEG lateralizations, one (14%) had EEG ictal onset and one (14%) had MRI lesions that lateralized; none had surgery. The relationship between lateralized EEG and magnetoencephalographic dipoles forecasts surgical candidacy. Concordant lateralizations predict good seizure control after surgery by identifying the primary epileptogenic hemisphere. Discordant lateralizations signify an undetermined epileptogenic hemisphere and contraindicate surgery without further testing.     

"Supplementary motor area (SMA) seizure" rather than "SMA epilepsy" in optimal surgical candidates: a document of subdural mapping

PURPOSE: To clarify the relationship between epileptogenic zone and supplementary motor area (SMA) in patients who were regarded as the optimal surgical candidates for their intractable SMA seizures. METHODS: We analyzed the epileptogenic zone at/or adjacent to the SMA in four patients with clinical SMA seizures. All four patients had noninvasive presurgical evaluations (long-term video/EEG monitoring, MRI, and neuroimaging with radioisotopes), which provided convergent results between ictal semiology and the epileptogenic area, and thus, they had chronically implanted subdural electrodes, and finally had focus resection with a follow-up period of more than 2 years. RESULTS: Three patients had lesions shown by MRI outside the SMA, and one patient had a lesion within the SMA. Interictal epileptiform discharges were seen at/or outside the SMA. Ictal EEG pattern originated from the SMA in one patient, from the high lateral frontal area in two patients, and from the precuneus in one patient. In the latter three patients, the ictal EEG pattern immediately spread to the SMA. Those ictal onset zones were consistently localized within/or just adjacent to the lesions revealed by MRI. Only one patient had SMA resection, and three had the resection of epileptogenic zone by preserving the SMA. No neurological deficits developed and good seizure control was achieved. CONCLUSION: Among surgical candidates for intractable SMA seizures, frontal cortex other than SMA or even parietal cortex can be epileptogenic, and thus, the SMA itself may not necessarily have to be resected. This notion is clinically important when selecting surgical candidates as well as when planning presurgical invasive evaluation in patients with intractable SMA seizures.     

额叶癫痫的特点及手术治疗

目的 :分析额叶癫痫的临床特征、发作期及发作间期脑电图特点 ,探讨额叶癫痫手术治疗。方法 :应用视频脑电图对 9例额叶癫痫患者进行长程监测 ,并对其中 6例记录颅内脑电图。分析癫痫发作的临床表现及脑电图特点 ,定位致痫灶 ,行手术切除。结果 :额叶癫痫的发作特点为 :发作频繁而短暂 ,以睡眠期发作为主 ,常见过度运动 ,姿势性强直 ,发声等发作症状。发作期可见棘波节律 ,广泛低幅快活动 ,节律性慢波等特征性脑电活动。颅内电极记录可清晰显示异常脑电活动的发作起源及扩散情况 ,有助于定位致痫灶。手术切除病灶及致痫灶 ,效果满意。结论 :额叶癫痫是一组具有特征性的癫痫综合征 ,颅内电极记录有助于揭示其脑电活动变化。对于难治疗性额叶癫痫 ,准确定位致痫灶是手术成功的关键。     

MEG predicts outcome following surgery for intractable epilepsy in children with normal or nonfocal MRI findings

PURPOSE: To identify the predictors of postsurgical seizure freedom in children with refractory epilepsy and normal or nonfocal MRI findings. METHODS: We analyzed 22 children with normal or subtle and nonfocal MRI findings, who underwent surgery for intractable epilepsy following extraoperative intracranial EEG. We compared clinical profiles, neurophysiological data (scalp EEG, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and intracranial EEG), completeness of surgical resection and pathology to postoperative seizure outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen children (77%) had a good postsurgical outcome (defined as Engel class IIIA or better), which included eight (36%) seizure-free children. All children with postsurgical seizure freedom had an MEG cluster in the final resection area. Postsurgical seizure freedom was obtained in none of the children who had bilateral MEG dipole clusters (3) or only scattered dipoles (1). All five children in whom ictal onset zones were confined to < or = 5 adjacent intracranial electrodes achieved seizure freedom compared to three of 17 children with ictal onset zones that extended over >5 electrodes (p = 0.002). None of six children with more than one type of seizure became seizure-free, compared to eight of 16 children with a single seizure type (p = 0.04). Complete resection of the preoperatively localized epileptogenic zone resulted in seizure remission in 63% (5/8) and incomplete resections, in 21% (3/14) (p = 0.06). Age of onset, duration of epilepsy, number of lobes involved in resection, and pathology failed to correlate with seizure freedom. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for intractable epilepsy in children with normal MRI findings provided good postsurgical outcomes in the majority of our patients. As well, restricted ictal onset zone predicted postoperative seizure freedom. Postoperative seizure freedom was less likely to occur in children with bilateral MEG dipole clusters or only scattered dipoles, multiple seizure types and incomplete resection of the proposed epileptogenic zone. Seizure freedom was most likely to occur when there was concordance between EEG and MEG localization and least likely to occur when these results were divergent.