Diagnosis of traumatic thoracic aortic rupture: a 10-year retrospective analysis

A 10-year retrospective analysis of 82 patients with suspected thoracic aortic rupture (TAR) due to blunt chest trauma was performed to define which symptoms and signs were helpful in making an early diagnosis. Symptoms and signs associated with TAR included midscapular back pain (in the absence of thoracic spine fracture), unexplained hypotension, upper extremity hypertension, bilateral femoral pulse deficits, and initial chest tube output in excess of 750 mL. Chest roentgenographic signs seen with significantly greater frequency in the 12 patients with TAR than in 70 patients without such rupture included a widened paratracheal stripe (7 patients), deviation of the nasogastric tube or central venous pressure line (5 patients), blurring of the aortic knob (9 patients), abnormal paraspinous stripe (6 patients), and rightward tracheal deviation (5 patients). Mediastinal widening of greater than 8 cm occurred in 11 of the 12 patients with TAR (sensitivity, 92%); its specificity, however, was only 10% (11 true-positive and 63 false-positive results). In patients in hemodynamically stable condition who display these findings, immediate aortography should be considered. The presence of myocardial contusions, intraabdominal injuries, and pelvic fractures also occurred more frequently in patients with TAR. We conclude that a detailed history, physical examination, and chest roentgenography, with rapid progression to aortography in suspicious cases, represent the safest and most reliable approach to patients with TAR.     

Traumatic rupture of the aorta. Indications for aortography

The indications for thoracic aortography in the blunt chest trauma patient remain controversial. Clinical and radiographic findings in 102 patients seen at a Level I Trauma Center over a five-year period were reviewed to evaluate criteria predictive of major thoracic vascular injury. Five patients had positive aortograms. There was no significant correlation with Revised Trauma Score, symptoms, or associated thoracic injuries, although patients with aortic rupture did have a higher incidence of extrathoracic injuries (P less than 0.001). A blinded review of admitting chest radiographs for five major findings (widened mediastinum, aortic arch abnormalities, aortopulmonary window opacification, left apical capping, and right apical capping) revealed a significant difference between patients with and without aortic injury (0.98 +/- 1.24 findings in the negative aortogram group and 3.00 +/- 0.71 findings in the positive aortogram group) (P less than 0.001). All patients with aortic rupture had at least two major positive findings on admitting chest radiographs. Admission chest x-ray evidence of at least one major abnormality is a safe method of screening blunt chest trauma patients for thoracic aortography.     

Chest radiographs of limited utility in the diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration

BACKGROUND: The radiographic diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration (BTAL) remains problematic. We reviewed our experience with chest radiographic signs of BTAL at a single trauma center. METHODS: The chest radiographs of 188 consecutive blunt trauma patients with suspected BTAL who underwent portable chest radiography and aortography were retrospectively reviewed by a thoracic radiologist. The presence or absence of 15 radiographic findings were recorded, and the sensitivity and specificity of individual radiographic signs and combinations of signs were determined. RESULTS: There were 10 patients with BTAL. Although three signs showed greater than 90% sensitivity for BTAL, these signs showed low specificity, and no significant improvement in overall accuracy was achieved by combining radiographic findings. CONCLUSION: The experience at our institution suggests that chest radiographs have limited utility in the accurate diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration. Cross-sectional imaging techniques will likely become the preferred imaging procedures for evaluating patients with suspected BTAL.     

The potential effects of radiographic criteria to exclude aortography in patients with blunt chest trauma. Results of a study of 32 patients with proved aortic or brachiocephalic arterial injury

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness, in patients with known aortic or brachiocephalic arterial injury, of five previously published radiographic criteria for excluding aortography in patients with blunt chest trauma. These criteria were (1) normal findings on erect chest radiograph; (2) normal aortic arch and left subclavian artery; (3) normal aortic arch, descending aorta, aortopulmonary window, tracheal position, and left paraspinal interface; (4) normal right paratracheal stripe and nasogastric tube position, and (5) normal aortic arch and tracheal and nasogastric tube position. One or more of these criteria were met in 6% to 25% of patient with major thoracic arterial injury, depending on the criteria used. Interestingly, two (6%) patients had radiographs that showed no specific signs of mediastinal hemorrhage, which indicates that the chest radiograph is limited in its sensitivity to detect major thoracic arterial injury. Because of these results, we do not believe that attempts to limit aortography in patients with supine film evidence of mediastinal abnormality, based on the absence of certain signs of mediastinal hemorrhage, are warranted. Furthermore, an abnormal radiograph cannot be relied on as the sole criterion for aortography if the goal of care is to detect as close to 100% of vascular injuries as possible.     

Radiographic Manifestations of Mediastinal Hemorrhage from Blunt Chest Trauma

The diagnosis of rupture of the thoracic aorta or its major branches depends largely on the recognition of mediastinal hemorrhage from the initial chest radiograph and subsequent thoracic aortography. This review discusses the radiographic manifestations of mediastinal hemorrhage, including widening of the mediastinum; a ratio of mediastinal width to chest width greater than 0.25; abnormalities of aortic contour; opacification of the aortopulmonary window; depression of the left main bronchus; deviation of the trachea to the right; deviation of the nasogastric tube to the right; the apical cap sign; widening of the paraspinal lines; widening of the right paratracheal stripe; and left hemothorax. The relationship of these manifestations to major thoracic arterial injury is examined. Pitfalls in the radiographic evaluation of mediastinal abnormalities are considered, and indications for computed tomography of the thorax and thoracic aortography in the severely injured patient are reviewed.     

A case of complete circumferential aortic rupture due to blunt chest trauma]

A case of complete circumferential rupture of the thoracic aorta due to blunt chest trauma is presented. A 46-year-old woman was admitted after a traffic accident. The admission chest X-ray film demonstrated rib fractures and mediastinal widening. CT scanning and aortography were performed, but acute rupture of the aorta was not detected. Twelve days later, aortography was performed again and an aneurysm was noted at the aortic isthmus. Surgery was performed immediately and aorta was found to be completely disrupted for a length of 1 cm. A short segmental prosthesis was interposed between the two ends of the aorta under temporary bypass. Patients with aortic rupture due to blunt chest trauma are increasing, but only a few cases treated in the acute stage have been reported. To our knowledge, this is the 6th case of complete aortic disruption which has been treated successfully in the acute stage in Japan.     

Emergency operation for traumatic thoracic aortic rupture diagnosed by enhanced chest computed tomography; report of a case

Thoracic aortic injury caused by blunt chest trauma is often fatal. Although aortography had been inevitable for thoracic surgery until recently, image of computed tomography (CT) is often superior to aortogram nowadays. We present a case of 64-yaer-old man with blunt chest trauma by traffic accident, who was successfully diagnosed and operated without invasive aortography. Thoracic aortic rupture was suspected by plain chest X-ray. His enhanced CT showed the localized leakage of contrast media near the arterial ligament of aortic arch. Because his condition was critically ill, operation was performed immediately without aortography. There found Y-shaped tear at the distal aortic arch, and was replaced with a prosthetic graft. Operation was performed under left heart bypass using heparin-coated circuit and centrifugal pump. We would stress that the enhanced chest CT is sufficiently diagnostic in thoracic aortic trauma like the present case.     

The trend of using computed tomography in the detection of acute thoracic aortic and branch vessel injury after blunt thoracic trauma: single-center experience over 13 years

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the trend of using chest computed tomography (CT) and aortography in evaluating patients with blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: A total of 85 patients who had blunt aortic injury diagnosed by chest CT, aortography, or both were included in this study. RESULTS: Aortography was the dominant modality before 1998, and the use of chest CT has increased to 50% of patients with aortic injuries as of 2001. Isolated aortic, branch vessel, or combined injuries were found in 71 (84%), 11 (13%), and 3 (4%) patients, respectively. All 14 patients with branch vessel injuries were diagnosed by aortography. Ninety-eight percent of patients with aortography were true-positives, and 20% of patients with chest CT had indirect signs of aortic injury. CONCLUSION: Our institution has increased the use of chest CT to evaluate blunt thoracic trauma. Patients with indirect signs of aortic injuries shown on chest CT require further evaluation. In our experience, angiography remains the optimal diagnostic modality for evaluating aortic branch vessel injuries.     

Transesophageal echocardiography. Preliminary results in patients with traumatic aortic rupture

Eleven patients with blunt chest trauma at risk for traumatic aortic rupture underwent transesophageal echocardiography to image the descending aorta. Diagnoses were compared with the results of radiographic studies. Ten of the 11 patients underwent arch aortography, with positive results in six cases. In one patient, the results of a computed tomographic scan were interpreted as consistent with aortic rupture. The results of transesophageal echocardiography were positive for ruptured descending aorta in three of six patients with positive aortographic findings, and negative in eight patients. All three patients with positive findings had the diagnosis of ruptured descending aorta confirmed at surgery. The remaining eight patients demonstrated no aortic morbidity. These preliminary findings suggest that transesophageal echocardiography is a useful technique for the diagnosis of ruptured descending aorta following blunt chest trauma.     

Associated aortic rupture-pelvic fracture: an alert for orthopedic and general surgeons.

Blunt trauma patients with pelvic fractures have been shown to have a two-fold to five-fold increased risk of aortic rupture compared with the overall blunt trauma population. A retrospective review was performed to determine whether the relationship between aortic rupture and pelvic fracture could be further delineated using a pelvic fracture classification based on mechanism of injury. Of 4,157 consecutive blunt trauma patients, 371 (8.9%) had pelvic fractures, 34 (0.8%) had ruptured thoracic aortas and 12 had both injuries. When pelvic fractures were classified according to vector of force, 10 of 12 (83%) aortic ruptures occurred in patients with an anterior-posterior compression fracture pattern, an incidence of aortic rupture eight times greater than that of the overall blunt trauma population. There was no increased incidence of aortic rupture among patients with any other pelvic fracture pattern. We conclude that the previously reported association between aortic rupture and pelvic fracture can be further specified to include, predominantly, those patients with an anterior-posterior compression fracture pattern.     

Traumatic aortic rupture: roentgenographic indications for angiography.

The principal radiological indication for thoracic aortography following blunt chest trauma has been a widened mediastinum on chest roentgenogram. The presence or absence of sixteen findings on 100 cm anteroposterior supine chest roentgenograms were noted and compared in 47 consecutive patients who underwent aortography following blunt thoracic trauma and 100 patients without trauma. On the basis of our data, we propose six radiological indications for thoracic aortography following chest trauma: mediastinum greater than 8 cm on 100 cm AP supine chest film; tracheal shift to the right; blurring of the normally sharp outline of the aorta; obliteration of the medial aspect of the apex of the left upper lobe; opacification of the clear space between the aorta and pulmonary artery; and depression of the left main bronchus below 40 degrees.     

The management of subclavian artery injuries following blunt thoracic trauma

The records of 15 patients who sustained blunt rupture of the subclavian artery were reviewed. The findings on physical examination included arterial hypotension, unilateral absence of the radial pulse, brachial plexus palsy, and supraclavicular hematoma. The chest roentgenographic findings included wide mediastinums, apical pleural hematomas, and first rib fractures. Fourteen patients survived to undergo angiography and operation. Arterial continuity was restored by primary anastomosis, synthetic grafts, and venous interposition grafts. Ligation of a pseudoaneurysm was carried out in 1 patient with a complete brachial plexus palsy. Amputation of an upper extremity was required in 1 patient. Two patients died postoperatively. We conclude that blunt subclavian artery injuries may be suspected clinically. Absent upper extremity pulses, a wide mediastinum, unrelenting thoracic hemorrhage, and persistent hypotension dictate the necessity for aortography. Relative indications for angiography include brachial plexus palsy, apical pleural hematoma, and a fractured first rib.     

Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury

Background: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is clinically difficult to diagnose, as signs and symptoms are unreliable and variable. The identification of TAI may be obscured by other injuries that are more apparent. Furthermore, radiologic evaluation of the mediastinum for this injury is not well defined. Most patients with TAI die immediately. Survivors have a contained rupture which requires crucial early diagnosis and treatment. Material and Methods: A Medline search was conducted using the terms "traumatic aortic injury", "aortic injury", "aortic trauma", and "thoracic trauma" from 1966 until December 2002. Investigations used in the diagnostic evaluation of blunt TAI were reviewed and an initial investigative approach to this condition formulated. Results: The choice of investigation for TAI depends on clinical suspicion, hemodynamic stability, availability, and rapidity of access to tests. These include chest radiography, helical computed tomography angiography (CT-A), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), aortography, and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). CT-A is considered an excellent test in hemodynamically stable blunt thoracic trauma patients. TEE is preferred in unstable patients. Conclusion: Investigations must confirm or exclude TAI with great precision. CT-A is a reliable screening and now primary diagnostic test in the hemodynamically stable patient. A negative CT-A excludes aortic injury, with a positive or equivocal CT-A leading to treatment or further diagnostic evaluation. TEE is appropriate for the hemodynamically unstable patient but is operatordependent and not widely available. Aortography is still considered the reference test for blunt TAI and is used when the results from other modalities are inconclusive.     

Blunt aortic trauma: signs of high risk

In the last 10 years, our center has managed 60 cases of aortic rupture from blunt chest trauma. Nineteen patients died (32%), 11 of whom were moribund on admission. Two patients out of ten who had undergone aortography at other institutions arrived at our hospital with massive bleeding in the left chest and died despite immediate operation. Six patients exsanguinated 1 to 2 1/2 hours after admission while aortography was being arranged or performed, and review of these cases to identify clinical signs of high risk revealed that left hemothorax, pseudocoarctation, and/or supraclavicular hematoma were present in five of the six. It appeared that the survival rate of patients suspected of blunt aortic trauma who had any of these clinical signs might be improved if they were taken directly to the operating room. To investigate this possibility we reviewed all cases from the past 10 years (excluding patients moribund on arrival or who had aortography elsewhere) in whom suspicion of aortic trauma led to aortography or surgery. Thirteen of the 17 patients (76%) with one or more signs of high risk had torn the aortic isthmus, compared to 26 of 154 patients (17%) without these signs. Five of the high-risk group (29%) exsanguinated, compared to one (less than 1%) of the others. No patient in this series died from unsuspected aortic trauma, which we attribute to the liberal use of aortography. Except for the patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage preoperatively, there were no operative or postoperative deaths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Thoracic spinal fractures and aortic rupture: a significant and fatal association

We analyzed the frequency of occurrence of traumatic aortic rupture (TAR) in patients with and without thoracic spinal fractures. Among 4,676 blunt chest trauma victims admitted to the hospital between 1972 and 1988, 148 (3.2%) suffered one or more thoracic vertebral fractures. There were 73 patients with one or more fractures of the first eight thoracic vertebrae (T1 to T8); of these 73, 4 also suffered TAR (5.5%). There were 4,603 patients without fractures of T1 to T8, and 64 of these patients also suffered TAR (1.4%). This difference was significant by the chi2 and Fisher exact tests, p = 0.00378 and p = 0.021003, respectively. Additionally, all 5 patients with TAR and thoracic vertebral fractures died. We conclude that patients with one or more fractures of T1 to T8 have a statistically significant increase in the incidence of TAR.     

Mediastinal evaluation utilizing the reverse Trendelenburg radiograph

When thoracic aortic rupture is suspected, a 45-degree reverse Trendelenburg (RT) anteroposterior (AP) chest radiograph should place the mediastinal structures in a more appropriate position and allow a more accurate evaluation than a supine AP radiograph. One hundred ninety-one consecutive hemodynamically stable adult patients with major blunt thoracic trauma were initially evaluated for mediastinal abnormalities associated with aortic disruption by both supine AP chest radiograph and an AP chest radiograph with the patient in 45-degree RT position. One hundred four patients underwent contrast aortography based on mediastinal abnormalities detected on the supine AP chest radiograph. Twenty of these patients had abnormal aortograms demonstrating traumatic aortic disruption confirmed at surgery. Supine and RT chest radiographs were retrospectively compared in a blinded fashion to evaluate their specificity and positive predictive value for detection of traumatic thoracic aortic rupture. If RT chest radiographic findings had been used to determine the need for further assessment, 29 angiograms (26%) would have been eliminated, specificity would have increased from 52 per cent to 69 per cent, and positive predictive value would have increased from 19 per cent to 27 per cent. Both supine and RT chest radiographs demonstrated mediastinal widening in all 20 patients with abnormal aortograms, with no missed thoracic aortic disruptions (100% sensitivity). This study indicated that the RT chest radiograph may be used instead of the standard supine radiograph as the initial screen for mediastinal evaluation, maintaining a high sensitivity and eliminating the cost and morbidity of many unnecessary aortograms.     

Scapular fractures and concomitant injuries

Objective: The association of scapular fractures with other life-threatening injuries including blunt thoracic aortic injury is widely recognized.Few studies have investigated this presumed association...     

Upper rib fractures and mediastinal widening: indications for aortography

Survival of patients with posttraumatic thoracic aortic rupture depends on early diagnosis. It is frequently stated that fracture of the first or second ribs and mediastinal widening are findings suggestive of thoracic aortic rupture. We found that the probability of sustaining thoracic aortic rupture is the same for patients with upper rib fractures as for those with other rib fractures (1/64 versus 5/149; p = 0.85). Also, our data fail to show a statistical difference in the incidence of thoracic aortic rupture associated with upper (first and second) rib fractures compared with no rib fracture at all (1/64 versus 9/304; p = 0.85). Thus, patients with thoracic aortic rupture are not more likely to have rib fractures (7/21 versus 14/21; p = 0.15), and if a rib fracture is present, the probability of it being at the upper level is the same as that for a fracture at any other level (1/7 versus 6/7; p = 0.06). Ratios of mediastinal width to chest width were used as a measure of mediastinal widening, and were found to be an accurate predictor of thoracic aortic rupture. Ratios greater than 0.28 at the aortic knob were 100% specific and 85% sensitive for this condition.     

Blunt chest trauma in childhood

BACKGROUND: Although thoracic injuries are uncommon in children, their rate of morbidity and mortality is high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of children with blunt chest injury and to investigate the predictive accuracy of their paediatric trauma scores (PTS). METHODS: Between September 1996 and September 2006, children with blunt thoracic trauma were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical features and PTS of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: There were 27 male and 17 female patients. The mean age was 7.1 +/- 3.4 years, and the mean PTS was 7.6 +/- 2.4. Nineteen cases were injuries caused by motor vehicle/pedestrian accidents, 11 motor vehicle accidents, 8 falls and 6 motor vehicle/bicycle or motorbike accidents. The following were noted: 28 pulmonary contusions, 12 pneumothoraxes, 10 haemothoraxes, 9 rib fractures, 7 haemopneumothoraxes, 5 clavicle fractures and 2 flail chests, 1 diaphragmatic rupture and 1 pneumatocele case. The cut-off value of PTS to discriminate mortality was found to be < or = 4, at which point sensitivity was 75.0% and specificity was 92.5%. Twenty-seven patients were treated non-operatively, 17 were treated with a tube thoracostomy and two were treated with a thoracotomy. Four patients who suffered head and abdominal injuries died (9.09%). CONCLUSION: Thoracic injuries in children expose a high mortality rate as a consequence of head or abdominal injuries. PTS may be helpful to identify mortality in children with blunt chest trauma. Blunt thoracic injuries in children can be treated with a non-operative approach and a tube thoracostomy.     

Comparison of ultrasonography and radiography in diagnosis of rib fractures

Purpose: Rib fractures are the most common skeletal thoracic injuries resulting from blunt chest trauma. Half of the rib fractures are not detected upon a precise physical evaluation and radiographs. Recently ultrasonography (USG) has been investigated to detect rib fractures. But based on literature the usefulness of USG varies widely. This study was conducted to investigate the role of USG in the detection of possible rib fractures in comparison with radiography. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, consecutive patients with minor blunt chest trauma and suspected rib fractures presenting in Imam Reza Hospital located in Mashhad-Iran, between April 2013 and October 2013 were assessed by USG and radiography. The radiography was performed in a posteroanterior (PA) chest projection and oblique rib view centered over the area of trauma. The time duration spent in taking USG and radiography were recorded. The prevalence and location of fractures revealed by USG and radiography were compared. Results: Sixty-one suspected patients were assessed. The male to female ratio was 2.4:1 (43 men and 18 women) with a mean ± SD age of (44.3 ± 19.7) years. There were totally 59 rib fractures in 38 (62.3%) patients based on radiography and USG, while 23 (37.7%) patients had no diagnostic evidence of rib lesions. USG revealed 58 rib fractures in 33 (54.1%) of 61 suspected patients and radiographs revealed 32 rib fractures in 20 (32.8%) of 61 patients. A total of 58 (98.3%) rib fractures were detected by USG, whereas oblique rib view and PA chest radiography showed 27 (45.8%) and 24 (40.7%) rib fractures, respectively. The average duration of USG was (12 ± 3) min (range 7e17 min), whereas the duration of radiography was (27 ± 6) min (range 15-37 min). The kappa coefficient showed a low level of agreement between both USG and PA chest radiography (kappa coefficient=0.28), and between USG and oblique rib view (kappa coefficient=0.32). Conclusion: USG discloses more fractures than radiography in most patients presenting with suspected rib fractures. Moreover USG requires significantly less time than radiography.