Celiac plexus block: a new technique using the left lateral approach

We describe a new celiac plexus block approach in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma who was referred to the Pain Clinic due to uncontrollable abdominal pain. The patient was initially programmed for a neurolytic celiac plexus block using the anterior approach with helical computerized tomography (CT) guidance. The CT scan revealed interposition of the transverse colon in the anterior approach territory, which made the anterior approach technique difficult, and also difficulty to practice the posterior approach without injuring the kidneys. We decided to attempt a left lateral atypical approach because the CT revealed the possibility of using a left lateral window to arrive to the celiac area. The left lateral access allowed us to carry out the neurolytic block using 50% alcohol without injuring any viscera. The patient tolerated the technique and was discharged without pain. No complications regarding either the punction or the block were observed.     

CT引导下腹腔神经丛毁损术治疗慢性顽固性腹部癌痛

目的：观察CT引导下腹腔神经丛毁损性阻滞对顽固性腹部癌痛的镇痛效果及患者生活质量的影响。方法：74例顽固性腹部癌症疼痛患者，在CT引导监视下经背侧入路经皮穿刺腹腔神经丛无水乙醇阻滞治疗。结果：治疗后一周内全部患者疼痛减轻或消失。在治疗后第7、14、30、60天，患者的疼痛评分、疼痛缓解率、生活质量均明显改善，大多数患者临终前无痛或仅轻度疼痛。治疗过程中和治疗后未发生严重并发症。结论：CT引导下腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗顽固性腹部癌痛的疗效确切，安全性高．     

Coeliac plexus block using computed tomography guidance

Coeliac plexus blocks have been used successfully in the treatment of abdominal pain in advanced cancer and in benign chronic abdominal pain. However, concern remains about occasional potentially serious complications. One possible way to reduce the risks of this procedure may be to improve imaging during the procedure. We report a series of 38 coeliac plexus blocks carried out under computer tomographic (CT) guidance, mostly using the anterior approach. The technique is described. Effectiveness and side-effect rates were similar to other reported series. There were no major complications. Analysis of contrast spread would indicate that anterior preaortic or bilateral contrast spread is necessary to obtain pain relief. Our experience would indicate that routine CT guidance can be a simple aid to coeliac plexus block, and can be achieved easily in a district general hospital. Improved imaging allows accurate needle placement, while avoiding vital structures such as the aorta and pleura. Accurate placement may also allow the use of reduced volumes of neurolytic drugs.     

经皮腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗癌性疼痛

目的:评价CT引导下经皮腹腔神经丛阻滞(NCBP)治疗癌性疼痛的安全性和疗效。方法:11例晚期肿瘤伴持续性疼痛患者,在CT引导下采用双侧后路膈脚前阻滞法阻滞腹腔神经丛。结果:11例NCBP技术成功率100%。术后1周完全缓解(CR)7例、部分缓解(PR)3例、轻度缓解(MR)1例,有效率90.9%。术后2个月CR:5例、PR:3例、MR:3例,有效率72.7%。3例发生体位性低血压,3例出现轻中度腹泻。结论:CT引导下经皮腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗癌性疼痛,是一种安全、有效的方法。     

Computed tomography-guided neurolytic celiac plexus block with alcohol complicated by superior mesenteric venous thrombosis

Neurolytic celiac plexus block (CPB) under radiological guidance is often performed to manage pain associated with pancreatic cancer. Serious complications related to the block are rare. Computed Tomography (CT)-guided neurolytic CPB is advocated to improve the efficacy of the block and to reduce the incidence of associated complications. We describe a case of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis associated with neurolytic CPB performed under CT guidance.     

CT引导内脏与腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗上腹癌痛的比较

目的：观察CT引导下内脏与腹腔神经丛毁损性阻滞对上腹癌痛的镇痛效果比较。方法：48例顽固性上腹部癌症重度疼痛患者，随机分两组，在CT引导下分别行腹腔神经丛（Ｆ组）或内脏神经丛（Ｎ组）无水乙醇毁损阻滞治疗。观察两组镇痛效果、疼痛缓解程度及不良反应。结果：治疗后即刻全部患者疼痛减轻或消失。在治疗后第3、7、15、30、60、90天，患者的疼痛评分、疼痛程度均明显改善，两组间无显著差异，治疗过程中和治疗后未发生严重并发症。结论：内脏神经丛阻滞可取得与腹腔神经丛阻滞一致的效应，操作方便、疗效确切、安全性高，可供临床选择。     

Computed tomography-guided anterior approach to the superior hypogastric plexus for noncancer pelvic pain: a report of two cases

The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility and describe the methodology of a computed tomography-guided anterior approach to superior hypogastric plexus block for noncancer pain. A computed tomography-guided anterior approach to the superior hypogastric plexus was used in 2 patients with pelvic pain and anatomic disturbance of the lumbar spine, which was a contraindication to the conventional dorsal approach. The first case was a 43-year-old patient suffering from burning pain of the urethra. Pain relief using analgesics and antidepressants was insufficient. The posterior approach was excluded due to coexisting irritation of the L5 nerve root. The second case was a 68-year-old man suffering from chronic burning and itching pain of the urethra and glans penis. Conservative therapy (anti-inflammatory drugs, tramadol, spasmolytics) failed to provide satisfactory pain relief. The posterior approach was contraindicated because of laterally prominent L5 vertebral body osteophytes. Both patients received a prognostic block to the superior hypogastric plexus via the anterior approach guided by computed tomography. Visual analog scale scores prior to the block were 6 to 7 and 5 to 6, respectively. The visual analog scale scores 24 hours after the block were 1 and 0, respectively. The second patient received a permanent neurolytic block via the anterior approach to provide long-term pain relief. In conclusion, the authors describe the computed tomography-guided anterior approach to the superior hypogastric plexus for chronic pelvic pain. The technique is simple to perform, and the analgesic effect is satisfactory. More extensive studies are necessary to evaluate the safety of this approach.     

Celiac plexus block in cancer pain management

The neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) has been recommended for pain relief in patients with upper abdominal cancer by the WHO Cancer Pain Relief Program. In this article, we review the indications, techniques, and adverse effects of NCPB based on the previous findings in the literature and our own experience of 142 NCPBs during the past 11 years. No well-validated indication criteria for the NCPB have been available from invasive trials or non-invasive pain evaluations. Thus, the procedure has been employed using comprehensive pain assessment. Several modified approaches have been described for NCPB with differences in the target space where the alcohol is injected (precrural and retrocrural) and the insertion route of the needle (posterolateral and transdiscal). We have used the retrocrural transdiscal approach because of its simplicity and safety. The efficacy of the resultant pain relief does not differ among these techniques. Therefore, whether a distinction exists between blocks of the celiac plexus and those of the splanchnic nerves is controversial. The term "peri-aortic nerve block" may better describe the feature of this neurolytic intervention. The noteworthy adverse effects of alcoholic neurolysis include regional pain, hypotension, diarrhea, hypoxemia, and acute alcoholic intoxication. Most of them are transient and controllable. The diarrhea may counteract the morphine-induced constipation. NCPB relieves visceral pain in upper abdominal cancer with no serious adverse effects. We recommend this procedure to improve the quality of life of the patients suffering from abdominal cancer pain.     

Lumbar sympathetic block for pain relief in two patients with interstitial cystitis. (Shimane Medical University, Izumo, Japan) Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:271–273.

This case report discussed the effective treatment of interstitial cystitis (IC) with regard to a 63-year-old woman and a 78-year-old woman. Medical therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticholinergics, and hydrodistention of the bladder failed to improve their symptoms. Subsequently, a continuous lumbar epidural block using 1% mepivacaine was used in these patients. A transient reduction of the symptoms in both patients was achieved. A lumbar sympathetic block with a neurolytic agent produced almost complete and long-lasting relief of their symptoms. Conclude that lumbar sympathetic block using a neurolytic agent produced long-lasting pain relief in 2 patients with IC.
Comment by Pedro F. Bejarano, M.D. Chronic visceral pain association to the neurovegetative system and to sympathetically-maintained mechanisms has been well documented nowadays. The multiple neural connections among different abdominal nerve plexus has also been described, and this anastomoses may account for the observed analgesic effects in this case obtained without specific blockade of the superior hypogastric plexus. Despite the reported good results, the use of the lumbar approach may be controversial in this cases, as the uncomfortable peripheral effects of a permanent lumbar sympathetic neurolytic block (i.e.: lower limb vasodilation) favors a more anatomically restricted (visceral) area like that obtained with a superior hypogastric approach.
We must remark that the existence of Sympathetically mediated and/or maintained pain is not enough phenomenae to fit the diagnostic criteria of a RCPS, as suggested by the authors, but it is less so in the case of an evidently persistent, organic source of visceral nociception like in the Intersticial Cystitis disease.     

Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: diagnosis and treatment patterns among acupuncturists evaluating the same patient. (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) Southern Med J. 2001;94:486–492.

This case report discussed a 62-year-old woman who suffered from intractable, tumor-associated pain. Neurolytic celiac plexus block (CPB) under radiological guidance is often performed to manage pain associated with pancreatic cancer. Serious complications related to the block are rare. Computed tomography (CT)-guided neurolytic CPB is advocated to improve the efficacy of the block and to reduce the incidence of associated complications.     

A new approach to the neurolytic block of the coeliac plexus: the transaortic technique

The present study critically examines the coeliac plexus block techniques hitherto adopted, pointing out the complications involved and stressing the seriousness of the neurological complications due to spread of the neurolytic agent to the sympathetic chain and the lumbar plexus. Contrast enhanced CT scans demonstrate the difficulties involved in confining the neurolytic agent to the anterior, peri-aortic and precrural regions. The authors report their recent experience with coeliac plexus block by means of a single transaortic needle in 28 patients. In 12 of the patients, the CT scan revealed a spread was anterior to the medial crura of the diaphragm, sometimes extending laterally towards the costovertebral gutter along the ventral surface of the diaphragm.     

CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block technique

Up to now, the studies in the world have demonstrated that CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block (PNCPB) is an invaluable therapeutic modality in the treatment of refractory abdominal pain caused by cancer. Its efficacy of pain relief varied in reported studies. The main technical considerations which would affect the analgesic effects on abdominal pain included the patients’ cooperation, needle entry approaches, combined use of blocking approaches, localization of the target area, dosage of the blocker, and so on. A success of PNCPB depends greatly on close cooperation with patients. The patient should be educated about the purpose and steps of the procedure, and trained of breathing in and breathing hold. The needle entry can be divided into the posterior approach and the anterior approach. The former one is the most commonly used in clinical practice, but the latter one is rarely used except in the cases that the posterior approach becomes technically difficult. Bilateral multiple blocking of celiac plexus and splanchnic nerves is often required to achieve optimal analgesia. The needle entry site, insertion course, and depth should be preselected and simulated on CT monitor prior to the procedure in order to ensure an accurate and safe celiac plexus block. The magnitude of analgesic effect is closely related to the degree of degeneration and necrosis of the celiac plexus. Maximally filling with blocker in the retropancreatic space is an indication of sufficient blocking. We also provided an overview of indications and contraindications, preoperative preparations, complications and its treatment of PNCPB.     

Celiac plexus block for visceral pain

Celiac plexus block has long been used to provide analgesia for upper abdominal pain. In particular, neurolytic celiac plexus block has been advocated for pancreatic cancer pain. In this article, recent advances clarifying the role and limitations of neurolytic celiac plexus block are reviewed. Neurolytic celiac plexus block provides persistent augmented analgesia when used as an adjunct to systemic opiates, but does not reliably decrease opiate requirements. In addition, neurolytic celiac plexus block may prolong survival, but the data supporting this remain controversial. The optimal technique for accomplishing neurolytic celiac plexus block remains undetermined.     

Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block for anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome after laparoscopic surgery: A case report

BACKGROUNDAnterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome is defined as abdominal pain due to entrapped intercostal nerves. This is the first report of a patient successfully treated for anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome after laparoscopic surgery with an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block. The rectus sheath block physically lysed adhesions and relieved pain from anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome.CASE SUMMARYThe patient is a 44-year-old man who presented with severe left upper abdominal pain at an operative scar one month after laparoscopic ulcer repair. Diagnosis and treatment were performed using an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block with 0.1% lidocaine 20 mL. The pain was relieved after the block. The diagnosis was anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome. Rectus sheath block may be effective for patients with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome.CONCLUSIONUltrasound-guided rectus sheath block is a promising treatment modality for patients with postoperative anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome due to adhesions.     

Neurolytic celiac plexus block: a better alternative to opioid treatment in upper abdominal malignancies: an Indian experience

The majority of patients with advanced upper abdominal malignancies suffer from moderate to severe pain due to unavailability of morphine in developing world. This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of neurolytic celiac plexus block on pain and quality of life in this patient subpopulation. One hundred consecutive patients receiving opioids for their pain relief were divided in two groups. Group I (control) patients received oral morphine & NSAIDS and group II (study) patients underwent neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) to compare their effects on pain relief, morphine consumption, quality of life (QOL), Karnofsky and performance scores up to one month. NCPB provided statistically significant better pain relief and reduced morphine consumption at one month (P = 0.000). Superior Karnofsky and performance scores also favored NCPB group (P = 0.000); however the difference in overall QOL was not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Patients in oral morphine group had more side effects (94% vs. 58%) as compared to NCPB (P = 0.000). NCPB is an effective tool to reduce opioid requirement and the drug-related adverse effects. It is a rewarding technique, especially when morphine availability and its easy accessibility to the deserving patient is poor.     

Increasing the efficacy of a celiac plexus block in patients with severe pancreatic cancer pain.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical possibilities of placing a catheter near the celiac plexus for performance of a celiac plexus block, and to study the efficacy of repeated neurolytic celiac plexus blocks with alcohol in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer pain resistant to opioid treatment. In 12 patients, a neurolytic celiac plexus block with alcohol, administered via an indwelling celiac catheter, was performed. To evaluate the efficacy, visual analog scale scores were recorded every day. Quality of life scores were registered before and 4 weeks following the procedure. Alterations in opioid consumption, and the time between the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and the performance of the block, were registered. All patients were followed until they died. Two patients remained without pain after the first neurolytic celiac plexus block. In all other patients a second block was administered which provided only temporary relief. Additional intermittent administration of bupivacaine through the catheter was necessary to provide adequate pain relief in these patients. Quality of life increased significantly during the treatment. Opioid consumption decreased significantly in all patients. Our study indicates that a neurolytic celiac plexus blockade with alcohol results in a significant but short-lasting analgesic effect. The use of a celiac catheter improves the long-term management of pancreatic cancer pain.     

Celiac plexus block following high-dose opiates for chronic noncancer pain in a four-year-old child

This is the first case report documenting the use of a neurolytic celiac plexus block for relieving chronic noncancer pain in a pediatric patient. The child was a 4-yr-old male with an unknown form of inflammatory bowel disease since 1 yr of age. Chronic abdominal pain became a problem at 3 yr of age, following multiple bowel resections; continuous intravenous narcotic administration was implemented for pain control. The patient's pain became refractory to high-dose morphine administration (maximum dose, 267 mg/kg/day, iv), and, for that reason, a CT-guided neurolytic celiac plexus block was performed. This procedure resulted in improved pain control along with a major reduction in narcotic use to 7 mg/kg/day of morphine.     

Subarachnoid neurolytic block (L5-S1) and unilateral percutaneous cervical cordotomy in the treatment of pain secondary to pelvic malignant disease

The present study deals with the immediate and long-term results of subarachnoid neurolytic block (L5-S1) with 7.5%, 10% and 15% concentrations of phenol in glycerine and/or unilateral percutaneous cervical cordotomy in 73 patients (follow-up in 56 patients) suffering from perineal, perineopelvisacral or pelvisacral pain secondary to malignant diseases of the pelvic cavity. Subarachnoid neurolytic block (L5-S1) produced satisfactory, long-lasting relief of perineal pain when the higher concentrations of phenol (10 and 15%) were used. The only sequela reported was urinary retention. Percutaneous cervical cordotomy used for the treatment of pelvisacral or predominantly unilateral perineal pain gave complete pain relief until death in 76.7% of patients, either alone (36.7%) or in conjunction with pharmacological therapy (40%). Analysis of the data enabled us to establish the respective indications for the two procedures and to identify those cases in which their use may be complementary.     

Ultrasound‐Guided Paravertebral Neurolytic Block: A Report of Two Cases

Paravertebral block is commonly used in the treatment for acute and chronic pain. The duration of paravertebral block could theoretically be prolonged with neurolytic agents. We report two cases of ultrasound‐guided neurolytic paravertebral blocks in patients suffering from intense cancer‐related thoracic pain. Ultrasound was used to identify the space and plane of injection at the mid‐thoracic level. Absolute alcohol was used to block the nerves at different segments. The two patients had great pain relief. Neurolytic paravertebral block can be a useful technique in patients with intractable cancer pain. Because of the risk of complication, it is recommended that this technique should be limited to relief of intractable pain in cancer patients with a poor prognosis.     

Managing Difficult Pain Conditions in the Cancer Patient

Chronic abdominal pain is a devastating problem for patients and providers, due to the difficulty of effectively treating the entity. Both benign and malignant conditions can lead to chronic abdominal pain. Precision in diagnosis is required before effective treatment can be instituted. Celiac Plexus Block is an interventional technique utilized for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in the treatment of abdominovisceral pain. The richly innervated plexus provides sensory input about pathologic processes in the liver, pancreas, spleen, omentum, alimentary tract to the mid-transverse colon, adrenal glands, and kidney. Chronic pancreatitis and chronic pain from pancreatic cancer have been treated with celiac plexus block to theoretically decrease the side effects of opioid medications and to enhance analgesia from medications. Historically, the block was performed by palpation and identification of bony and soft tissue anatomy; currently, various imaging modalities are at the disposal of the interventionalist for the treatment of pain. Fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) guidance and endoscopic ultrasound assistance may be utilized to aid the practitioner in performing the blockade of the celiac plexus. The choice of radiographic technology depends on the specialty of the interventionalist, with gastroenterologists favoring endoscopic ultrasound and interventional pain physicians and radiologists preferring CT guidance. A review is presented describing the indications, technical aspects, and agents utilized to block the celiac plexus in patients suffering from chronic abdominal pain.