MR arthrography of the posterior labrocapsular complex: relationship with glenohumeral joint alignment and clinical posterior instability

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the relationship between tears of the posterior labrocapsular complex and glenohumeral alignment on MR arthrography and the presence and extent of posterior labrocapsular tears in patients with posterior instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Posterior labrocapsular tears identified on 24 MR arthrograms and surgically confirmed were evaluated for length of tear and labrocapsular avulsion. These examinations and a comparison cohort of 70 normal MR arthrograms with normal findings were also evaluated for humeral head position relative to the glenoid fossa. Medical records were reviewed for clinical diagnosis of posterior instability and history of shoulder trauma. RESULTS: The position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid was significantly more posterior in patients with posterior labral tear than in patients with a normal posterior labrum (4.9 mm versus 0.7 mm; p < 0.0001). The mean length (+/- SD) of posterior labral tear was 15.9 +/- 1.7 mm, and a direct correlation was found between tear length and posterior humeral translation (r = -0.65; p = 0.002). Posterior labral tears were significantly longer (18.6 vs 13.1 mm; p = 0.04), and posterior humeral translation was greater (6.4 vs 3.4 mm; p = 0.006) in patients with labrocapsular avulsion than in those without avulsion. Twelve (50%) of the patients with posterior labrocapsular tear had posterior instability, and 10 (83%) had a history of macrotrauma. On MR arthrography, the mean posterior humeral translation was greater (6.2 mm +/- 0.08; p = 0.019), posterior labral tears were longer (19.4 mm +/- 1.7; p = 0.0008), and labrocapsular avulsion was more common (83%; p = 0.0001) in patients with posterior instability than in patients who had a posterior labral tear but a clinically stable shoulder. CONCLUSION: Clinical posterior instability is associated with excessive posterior humeral translation, long posterior labral tears, and posterior labrocapsular avulsion.     

SLAP lesions: anatomy, clinical presentation, MR imaging diagnosis and characterization

Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) tears are an abnormality of the superior labrum usually centered on the attachment of the long head of the biceps tendon. Tears are commonly caused by repetitive overhead motion or fall on an outstretched arm. SLAP lesions can lead to shoulder pain and instability. Clinical diagnosis is difficult thus imaging plays a key diagnostic role. The normal anatomic variability of the capsulolabral complex can make SLAP lesions a diagnostic challenge. Concurrent shoulder injuries are often present including rotator cuff tears, cystic changes or marrow edema in the humeral head, capsular laxity, Hill-Sachs or Bankart lesion. The relevant anatomy, capsulolabral anatomic variants, primary and secondary findings of SLAP tears including MR arthrography findings, types of SLAP lesions and a practical approach to labral lesions are reviewed.     

MR arthrography of the labral capsular ligamentous complex in the shoulder: imaging variations and pitfalls

OBJECTIVE: Using MR arthrography, we examined normal anatomy, anatomic variations, and pitfalls of imaging the labral capsular ligamentous complex in the asymptomatic shoulder. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We obtained 108 MR arthrograms of the glenohumeral joint in 95 asymptomatic volunteers with axial (108 shoulders) and oblique coronal (56 shoulders) images. We examined labral shape, patterns of capsular insertion, presence or absence of glenohumeral ligaments, and pitfalls of imaging. Our patients were men (auxiliary policemen) between 19 and 24 years old (mean age, 21 years). RESULTS: The shapes of labra were triangular (anterior part, 64%; posterior part, 47%), round (17%; 33%), flat (2%; 17%), cleaved (11%; 1%), notched (3%; 0%), or absent (2%; 2%). Using the system of Mosely and Overgaard, the anterior capsular insertion was type 1 in 63% of shoulders, type 2 in 20%, and type 3 in 17%; the posterior capsular insertion was type 1 in 60% of shoulders, type 2 in 31%, and type 3 in 9%. The superior and inferior glenohumeral ligaments were present in 99% of shoulders, but the middle glenohumeral ligament was present in only 79%. We also detected many pitfalls of MR imaging in identifying findings such as the undercutting of the labrum by cartilage (32% of shoulders), prominent axillary folds (46%), sublabral holes (7%) or recesses (33%), Buford complexes (2%), and sulci between the biceps tendon and superior labrum (30%). CONCLUSION: Knowledge of normal anatomy and anatomic variations of the labral complex is important for the examination of the shoulder with MR arthrography.     

MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to describe the appearance of the acetabular capsular-labral complex on MR arthrography and to correlate this appearance with surgical findings in adult patients and with gross anatomic findings in cadavers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MR arthrography of the hip joint was performed in 40 patients and six cadavers. All patients underwent subsequent arthrotomy of the hip. MR arthrography consisted of a T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence in both the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique planes after intraarticular injection of a 2 mmol/l solution of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The normal and pathologic appearance of the capsular-labral complex was assessed, and the labra were evaluated on the basis of morphology, signal intensity, presence of a tear, and attachment to the acetabulum. MR arthrography findings were correlated with the surgical results in all patients and with the anatomic sections of the cadaveric hip joint specimens. RESULTS: MR arthrography images of the T-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences allowed visualization of the anatomic structures. The normal labrum was triangular, without any sublabral sulcus, and of homogeneous low signal intensity. A recess between the labrum and the joint capsule could be identified in instances in which no thickened labrum was present. Labral lesions included labral degeneration, a tear, or a detached labrum either with or without thickening of the labrum. The sensitivity for detection and correct staging of labral lesions with MR arthrography in the patient study was 91%; the specificity, 71%; and the accuracy, 88%. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography with T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences allows excellent assessment of the normal and pathologic acetabular capsular-labral complex.     

Can isotropic fast gradient echo imaging be substituted for conventional T1 weighted sequences in shoulder MR arthrography at 3 Tesla?

PURPOSE: To assess the practical utility of isotropic shoulder imaging in patients undergoing MR arthrography. Isotropic shoulder imaging can be performed in less than three minutes with use of fast gradients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively interpreted MR images of the shoulder in 100 consecutive patients undergoing MR arthrography of the shoulder. All patients underwent MRI of the shoulder in oblique coronal, oblique sagittal, and axial planes on a 3.0-Tesla MRI system. All patients had conventional fast spin-echo T1-weighted imaging. All patients also had thin section (0.4 mm) isotropic spoiled gradient echo images performed. A total of 67 of the 100 patients underwent subsequent arthroscopy and results were compared with MR interpretations. RESULTS: There were 41 full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, nine partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears (seven articular surface and two bursal surface), 21 superior labral, 18 anterior labral, and seven posterior labral tears demonstrated by consensus retrospective reading of the 100 shoulder MR exams. There was no difference in interpretation of the isotropic images as compared to the conventionally acquired images in the oblique coronal, oblique sagittal, and axial planes. Some patients had more than one finding on each exam. A total of 67 patients went on to arthroscopy. There were 41 full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, nine partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, 21 superior labral, 18 anterior labral, and seven posterior labral tears demonstrated on arthroscopy. All full- and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears seen at arthroscopy were seen on consensus MR reading. A total of 19 out of the 21 patients with superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) tears at arthroscopy were seen on consensus MR reading. A total of 16 of the 18 anterior labral tears and six of the seven posterior labral tears seen at arthroscopy were seen on consensus MR reading. Some of the 67 patients had more than one finding on arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Isotropic imaging of the shoulder is practical in clinical imaging when performed with use of fast gradients on a 3-Tesla system. Isotropic imaging provides the same clinical information as conventional imaging and can be acquired in less than three minutes.     

Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most?

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI versus MR arthrography of the shoulder in the assessment of high-performance athletes (professional baseball players) and to compare our findings in these patients with the conventional MRI and MR arthrographic findings in an age-matched control group of nonprofessional athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional MRI and MR arthrographic examinations of the shoulder in 20 consecutive professional baseball players with shoulder pain were reviewed retrospectively by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus. These interpretations were compared with retrospective consensus interpretations of conventional MRI and MR arthrographic examinations of the shoulder obtained in a control group of 50 consecutive nonprofessional athletes with shoulder pain. MR images were assessed for full- or partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, superior labral anteroposterior (SLAP) tears, and anterior or posterior labral tears. RESULTS: In the 20 consecutive professional athlete patients, two full-thickness and six partial-thickness undersurface supraspinatus tendon tears were seen on MR arthrography but not seen on conventional MRI as well as six SLAP tears, two anterior labral tears, and one posterior labral tear. Three patients had both SLAP tears and full- or partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears. Of 14 patients with findings on MR arthrography that were not seen on MRI, 11 had arthroscopic correlation. In all 11, arthroscopic findings confirmed findings on MR arthrography. In the group of 50 nonprofessional athlete patients, five had additional findings on MR arthrography not seen on conventional MRI: two anterior labral tears, two partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, and two SLAP tears. One patient had both a partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear and a SLAP tear seen on MR arthrography. The five patients with additional findings on MR arthrography had arthroscopy. In all five, arthroscopic findings confirmed the findings on MR arthrography. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography is considerably more sensitive for detection of partial-thickness supraspinatus tears and labral tears than conventional MRI. MR arthrography showed injuries in addition to those seen on conventional MRI in 14 of 20 patients in the high-performance athlete group. These results suggest high-performance athletes may be a subgroup of patients for whom MR arthrography yields considerably more diagnostic information than conventional MRI.     

CT and MR Arthrography of the Glenoid Labroligamentous Complex

Because they distend the shoulder joint and bathe the labrum with contrast, CT arthrography (CTa) and MR arthrography (MRA) are both excellent tests for evaluating the labrum. In this article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each examination. We also describe techniques for performing CTa and MRA, including how to maximize image quality. The normal anatomy of the labrum and glenohumeral ligaments is described and demonstrated on both CTa and MRA images. To improve communication with orthopedic surgeons, the discussion of the pathology and normal variants of the labroligamentous complex is organized by functional anatomic regions. CTa and MRA images are then used to demonstrate a variety of pathologic and normal variant appearances of the labroligamentous complex.     

Capsulo-labro-ligamentous lesions of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyse the accuracy of MR arthrography in the evaluation of capsulo-labro-ligamentous lesions of the shoulder in patients with glenohumeral joint instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1999 to 2001 fifty-eight patients with glenohumeral joint instability were studied by MR arthrography. Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical repair: 11 by arthroscopic and 16 by arthrotomic approach. All shoulder evaluations were performed with T1 and T2 weighted axial, coronal and sagittal oblique images, before and after intra-articular injection of gadolinium contrast. RESULTS: Forty capsulo-ligamentous lesions (including 14 capsular ruptures with extravasation of the contrast medium) were detected by MR arthrography. Fifty-two labral tears (36 of the anterior, 13 of the superior and 3 of the posterior glenoid labrum) were identified: 11 out of 52 were not recognized before gadolinium contrast injection. Five rotator cuff tears were identified, one of which was not shown in the pre-injection examination. Surgical results confirmed the MR arthrographic findings in 25/27 patients. In one case MR arthrography did not recognize a SLAP lesion; in another case it identified a tear of the capsule but not of the glenoid labrum. CONCLUSIONS: In many cases of subacute glenohumeral joint lesions with intracapsular fluid, MR may accurately evaluate capsulo-labral-ligamentous lesions. Indeed, the examination of lesions is limited by the absence of the natural contrast determined by fluid; in such cases, intra-articular injection of gadolinium contrast is necessary. MR arthrography evaluates the degree of capsulo-labro-ligamentous tears and may guide the surgical approach.     

The anterior glenohumeral joint capsule: macroscopic and MRI anatomy of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">fasciculus obliquus</Emphasis> or so-called <Emphasis Type="Italic">ligamentum glenohumerale spirale</Emphasis>

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the macroscopic and MRI anatomy of the fasciculus obliquus, otherwise known as the ligamentum glenohumerale spirale or spiral GHL of the anterior shoulder joint capsule. Conventional and MR arthrography (1.5-T device Somatom Symphony, Siemens with shoulder coil) images in standard planes were compared with gross anatomic dissection findings in six fresh shoulder specimens from three cadavers. The MR imaging protocol included T1, PD and DESS 3D WI sequences. The macroscopically recognisable band—the spiral GHL—was identified by anatomic dissection and MRI in all the specimens. It was best visualised by MR arthrography on axial and oblique sagittal planes (T1; PD WI) and appeared as a low signal intensity stripe within the superficial layer of the anterior joint capsule. The absence of the variable middle glenohumeral ligament did not influence the anatomic properties and the MR imaging of the spiral GHL. Diagnostic visualisation of the normal anatomic structures is a prerequisite to distinguish between normal and pathologic conditions. Anatomy of the spiral GHL can be used by radiologists for more detailed interpretation of the anterior shoulder joint capsule ligaments on MR images.     

MRI of shoulder instability

The most unstable joint in the body, the glenohumeral joint is subject to many insults including microinstability, subluxation and dislocation. During the last two decades, MRI has allowed for direct visualization of many of the lesions related to instability, aiding in diagnosis as well as therapeutic planning and follow-up. This article reviews the use of MRI for shoulder instability and describes the different types of lesions associated with this disorder. Topics include technical considerations, the use of MR arthrography, normal anatomy and variants, labral and glenohumeral ligament pathology, and osseous lesions related to instability.     

Efficacy of ultrasonography-guided shoulder MR arthrography using a posterior approach

Aim  

Shoulder MR arthrography has an important role in the assessment of rotator cuff lesions, labral tears, glenohumeral ligaments, rotator interval lesions, and postoperative shoulder status. Injection in direct MR arthrography can be performed with palpation, fluoroscopy, ultrasonography (US), or MRI. Recently, the posterior approach is the preferred method due to the presence of fewer stabilizers, absence of important articular structures and less extravasation, has been advocated. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of US-guided MR arthrography via a posterior approach on the glenohumeral joint.     

Superior labral anteroposterior lesions: MR arthrography with arm traction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of arm traction combined with MR arthrography in the evaluation of superior labral anteroposterior (SLAP) lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaveric shoulders were studied with a 1.5-T MR imaging unit with the arm externally rotated. Fifteen milliliters of a gadolinium-containing contrast agent were injected into the glenohumeral joint. Twenty-four sets of images of cadaveric joints were evaluated independently by two observers. These sets consisted of MR arthrographic images obtained with traction (applied to the wrist using 1- to 3-kg weights) and without traction in five shoulders in which SLAP lesions had been excluded arthroscopically or by cadaveric sectioning; and MR arthrographic images obtained with and without traction in seven shoulders in which various types of SLAP lesions had been created arthroscopically and later confirmed by cadaveric sectioning. RESULTS: Analysis of the data indicated that MR arthrography in combination with arm traction and external rotation improved diagnostic accuracy with regard to identification and categorization of SLAP lesions when compared with studies made without traction. CONCLUSION: The combination of MR arthrography and arm traction with the shoulder in external rotation provides a more effective approach for detection of SLAP lesions than does similar MR arthrography performed without arm traction.     

Bizepsprobleme: Ultraschall, Magnetresonanztomographie und MR-Arthrographie

Ultrasound and MR imaging are competitive imaging modalities for the diagnosis of pathologic conditions of the biceps tendon. MR imaging has substantial advantages over ultrasound because biceps tendon lesions are most commonly located in the proximal part where lesions are hidden under the acromion for ultrasound assessment. The value of MR arthrography is substantiated by the capability to assess associated diagnoses which are otherwise difficult to assess. Associated diagnoses include full- and partial thickness tears of supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons, pulley lesions, and adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Moreover, MR arthrography is the method of choice for the assessment of superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions.     

MR arthrography of the lower extremity

MR arthrography by virtue of its ability accurately to demonstrate intra-articular structures and abnormalities of these structures has become an important tool for the evaluation of a variety of articular disorders. Although not necessary in all patients, MR arthrography may facilitate the evaluation of patients with suspected intra-articular pathology in whom conventional MRI is not sufficient for an adequate therapy planning. MR arthrography combines the advantages of arthrography, like joint distention and delineation of intra-articular structures, with the superior spatial resolution of MRI. This technique improves diagnostic confidence, particularly in the assessment of subtle lesions and of complex anatomic structures. MR arthrography is of high value in the evaluation of osteochondral defects, loose bodies, previously operated menisci, and acetabular labral lesions.     

Sublabral sulcus at the posteroinferior acetabulum: a potential pitfall in MR arthrography diagnosis of acetabular labral tears

OBJECTIVE: Our study correlated findings on hip MRI and MR arthrography with hip arthroscopy to assess the location, prevalence, and potential pitfall of a normal acetabular sublabral sulcus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected 58 hip MRI studies along with surgical reports in 58 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy over a 5-year period. Intraoperative photography (n = 23), radiography (n = 56), unenhanced MRI (n = 13), and MR arthrography (n = 54) studies were available for review. Two radiologists described hip anatomy on radiology studies with agreement by consensus. RESULTS: A normal posteroinferior sublabral groove was confirmed on available arthroscopy photographs in four (17.4%) of 23 hips. In each of these four patients, the anatomic sublabral groove correlated with apparent partial labral detachment on MR arthrography. On review of all studies, 13 hips (22.4%) without a posterior labral tear at surgery had imaging findings of a sublabral sulcus. The sulcus was not associated with acetabular dysplasia, which was radiographically noted in 12 cases (21.4%). Preoperatively, the sulcus was misdiagnosed as a tear in two cases. Labral tears were anterior or anterosuperior in 51 patients. CONCLUSION: A posteroinferior sublabral groove is a relatively common normal anatomic hip variation. If not recognized as normal, the sulcus may serve as a diagnostic pitfall on MR arthrography. Its location is distinct from most labral tears. We did not discover a sublabral sulcus at the anterior or anterosuperior acetabulum, the most common sites of labral injury.     

Schultergelenkverletzungen bei Überkopfsportarten

Overhead sport places great demands on the shoulder joint. Shoulder pain in overhead athletes and throwers can in the majority of cases be attributed to lesions resulting from chronic overuse of tendons and capsuloligamentous structures or to sequels of microinstability and secondary impingement. Due to its great impact on therapeutic decisions, imaging in athletes with unclear shoulder pain is a challenge. In this connection, magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography represents the cross-sectional imaging modality of first choice, as it allows depiction and exclusion of pathologic alterations of all relevant joint structures with sufficient confidence. This article reviews the biomechanical and clinical aspects and MR arthrographic features of the most common shoulder pathologies in overhead athletes, including biceps tendinopathy, superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions, rotator cuff lesions, as well as extrinsic and intrinsic impingement syndromes.     

Magnetresonanztomographie der Schulter

In addition to the case history and the clinical examination, MR imaging has an important role in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of numerous shoulder abnormalities and in the investigation of chronic shoulder pain. Important indications for MR imaging are any conditions or symptoms making assessment of the rotator cuff and the labrocapsular complex necessary. Assessment of the rotator cuff muscles, in particular, is crucial. The value of MR arthrography, which is still controversial, is discussed. The greatest potential benefit of MR arthrography is the accurate evaluation of subtle rotator cuff abnormalities and shoulder instability-related lesions, and the assessment of pathologic conditions of the long biceps tendon. This paper describes the most common pathologic findings of the shoulder joint and describes how the relevant findings are reported and quantified for the orthopaedic shoulder surgeon.     

MR imaging of the shoulder. Impingement and instability-related abnormalities

In addition to the case history and the clinical examination, MR imaging has an important role in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of numerous shoulder abnormalities and in the investigation of chronic shoulder pain. Important indications for MR imaging are any conditions or symptoms making assessment of the rotator cuff and the labrocapsular complex necessary. Assessment of the rotator cuff muscles, in particular, is crucial. The value of MR arthrography, which is still controversial, is discussed. The greatest potential benefit of MR arthrography is the accurate evaluation of subtle rotator cuff abnormalities and shoulder instability-related lesions, and the assessment of pathologic conditions of the long biceps tendon. This paper describes the most common pathologic findings of the shoulder joint and describes how the relevant findings are reported and quantified for the orthopaedic shoulder surgeon.     

Synovial fold of the posterior shoulder joint capsule

Purpose  The purpose of the study is to describe, based on shoulder MRI and MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation, a posterior joint capsule fold. Materials and methods  A retrospective review of 410 shoulder MRIs and direct MR arthrograms with arthroscopic correlation in positive cases (when available) was obtained with IRB approval and HIPPA compliance. The study was performed by three musculoskeletal radiologists. The criteria utilized to establish the diagnosis of posterior synovial fold included: (1) axial T1-weighted (T1W) on MR arthrography or axial T2* GRE-weighted on MRI demonstrating rounded thickening of the posterior shoulder joint capsule with a thickness at least 2 mm in diameter. (2) The posterior synovial fold extends in an oblique craniocaudal direction from the posterior–inferior joint capsule adjacent to the posterior–inferior glenoid labrum (7 o'clock) and continues superiorly away from the glenoid labrum to the posterior–superior joint capsule (11 o'clock). Results  Although uncommon, the posterior synovial fold was present in 2% (8/410) of studies reviewed and found predominantly in women (75%, 6/8). Four patients had arthroscopic confirmation of the posterior synovial fold. A higher percentage of posterior synovial folds were observed on shoulder MR arthrography (2.7%, 4/150) than on shoulder MRI (1.5%, 4/260). Conclusion  Although rare, the posterior synovial fold can be recognized and should not be confused with a posterior labral tear. Further investigation is needed to assess its histologic properties and its clinical significance.     

Diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the assessment of superior labral anteroposterior lesions of the shoulder

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the assessment of superior labral anteroposterior (SLAP) lesions of the shoulder with emphasis on the classification of SLAP lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-five MR arthrograms including 68 MR arthrograms of patients with arthroscopically proven SLAP lesions of the shoulder and 197 MR arthrograms of patients with an intact superior labrum and biceps anchor were retrospectively reviewed in random order. MR arthrography was performed using triplanar T1-weighted spin-echo sequences and a coronal oblique T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence. MR arthrograms were evaluated by two radiologists with agreement by consensus, and the results were compared with arthroscopic findings. RESULTS: Of 68 SLAP lesions, seven (10%) were arthroscopically classified as type I, 41 (60%) as type II (including 20 type II lesions with coexisting Bankart lesions [29%]), 14 (21%) as type III, and six (9%) as type IV. Compared with arthroscopy as the gold standard, MR arthrography showed a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 98% for the overall detection of SLAP lesions. MR arthrographic grading and arthroscopic grading were concurrent in 45 (66%) of 68 arthroscopic diagnoses. Of the surgically confirmed SLAP lesions, involvement of the biceps insertion and SLAP type II lesions with coexisting Bankart lesions were assessed correctly in 75% and 95% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography is a highly effective method for the detection of SLAP lesions, but this technique is limited in the classification of different types of SLAP lesions. However, for preoperative planning MR arthrography provides accurate information about the stability of the biceps insertion and the presence of associated anteroinferior labral injuries.