共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
Weifeng Tang Helena Engman Yali Zhu Brian Dayton David W. Boulton 《Clinical therapeutics》2019,41(8):1545-1563
PurposeFixed-combination drug products (FCDPs) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may show efficacy comparable to their individual components (ICs) while improving adherence to treatment. This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of 2 dapagliflozin/saxagliptin/metformin extended-release (XR) FCDPs relative to their ICs: saxagliptin and dapagliflozin/metformin XR.MethodsThis randomized, open-label, single-dose, single-center crossover study was conducted in 84 healthy subjects aged 18–55 years. The primary objective was to evaluate the fed-state bioequivalence of a dapagliflozin 5-mg/saxagliptin 2.5-mg/metformin 1000-mg XR FCDP and a dapagliflozin 10-mg/saxagliptin 5-mg/metformin 1000-mg XR FCDP relative to the ICs. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of saxagliptin, dapagliflozin, and metformin in both FCDPs and characterization of the PK parameters of the active metabolite of saxagliptin, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, in healthy subjects. PK parameters (AUC0–∞, AUC0–t, and Cmax) were used to assess the bioequivalence of the 2 FCDPs with their ICs. The Cmax and AUC0–t of the study drugs were compared between female and male subjects to assess sex differences in exposure. Safety and tolerability of both FCDPs and ICs were also assessed with adverse events, vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rate), 12-lead ECG, physical examinations, and laboratory assessments.FindingsBoth dapagliflozin/saxagliptin/metformin XR FCDPs were bioequivalent to their ICs. For the dapagliflozin 5-mg/saxagliptin 2.5-mg/metformin 1000-mg XR FCDP, the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio of dapagliflozin Cmax was slightly above the 80%–125% bioequivalence limit, which is unlikely to be clinically relevant. Food delayed the absorption of the study drugs in both FCDPs, which is unlikely to have a clinically relevant impact on efficacy. In both cohorts, exposure was higher in female subjects compared with male subjects, potentially due to the lower body weight of the female subjects. The safety profile and tolerability of the FCDPs were similar to those of their ICs, and no deaths or serious adverse events were reported.ImplicationsThese data support the use of the dapagliflozin/saxagliptin/metformin XR FCDP in patients with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03169959. 相似文献
2.
Richat Abbas Ann C. Childress Praneeta Nagraj Richard Rolke Sally A. Berry Donna R. Palumbo 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(5):733-740
Purpose
Methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release chewable tablet (MPH ERCT) is approved for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in patients aged 6 years and older. This article evaluates the pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability of MPH ERCT when chewed versus swallowed whole.Methods
In this open-label, single-dose, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover study, 12 healthy adult volunteers were randomly assigned to treatment sequence. In each period, subjects received a single 40-mg dose of the assigned treatment (MPH ERCT chewed, MPH ERCT swallowed whole, or methylphenidate extended-release oral suspension [MEROS]). Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected for 24 hours postdose. Key pharmacokinetic parameters included Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞.Findings
The geometric mean values for AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax were similar for MPH ERCT chewed, MPH ERCT swallowed whole, and MEROS. In all pairwise between-treatment comparisons, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax were fully contained within the bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. Early exposure over the first 4 hours after dosing (AUC0–4) was similar for MPH ERCT chewed versus swallowed whole; AUC0–4 was approximately 15% lower for MPH ERCT, either chewed or swallowed, compared with MEROS. Each treatment was generally well tolerated.Implications
There was no difference in overall rate or extent of exposure of methylphenidate when MPH ERCT was chewed versus swallowed whole by healthy volunteers. 相似文献3.
《Clinical therapeutics》2023,45(8):762-769
PurposeA fixed-dose combination (FDC) product combining dapagliflozin and metformin may increase medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by minimizing pill burden associated with co-administration of individual component (IC) formulations and, consequently, improve cost-efficiency and compliance. This study evaluated the bioequivalence of the dapagliflozin/metformin FDC product versus IC administration in healthy volunteers from a Chinese population and assessed the safety profile of the FDC product. In addition, pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety comparisons of dapagliflozin and metformin across different regions were conducted to evaluate regional differences.MethodsThis single-center, open-label, parallel-cohort, randomized, 2-period, crossover study enrolled Chinese adults (aged 18–55 years). Volunteers in cohort 1 received either a single FDC tablet of dapagliflozin/metformin extended release (XR) (5/500 mg) or IC tablets (dapagliflozin [5 mg] and metformin XR [500 mg]). Volunteers in cohort 2 received a higher dosage in a similar manner (dapagliflozin [10 mg] and metformin XR [1000 mg]). Volunteers in each cohort were subsequently crossed over to receive the alternate cohort treatment. Plasma concentrations of dapagliflozin and metformin were determined, and bioequivalence analyses were performed under standard fed conditions.FindingsEighty healthy Chinese volunteers (89.9% male; mean age, 28.7 years) were randomized into cohort 1 (n = 40) and cohort 2 (n = 39; 1 volunteer withdrew before receiving study treatment). The mean plasma concentration–time profiles of the dapagliflozin and metformin FDC and IC formulations for both doses were found to be nearly superimposable. Dapagliflozin and metformin XR FDC were bioequivalent to the IC tablets, with 90% CIs for each pairwise comparison contained within the 80% to 125% bioequivalence limits. Both the FDC and IC formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events/death. PK parameters for dapagliflozin in the Chinese volunteers were slightly to moderately higher than those from studies conducted in Brazil, Russia, and the United States, and the safety profile of the dapagliflozin/metformin FDC product was consistent with that of other studies. The difference in PK parameters among the 4 regions was not clinically meaningful.ImplicationsThe bioequivalence of the dapagliflozin/metformin FDC and IC formulations in healthy Chinese adults was established without any new safety concerns. Notably, the observed bioequivalence may be extrapolated to patients with T2DM as the PK parameters of dapagliflozin and metformin in healthy adults are similar to those reported in patients with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04856007. 相似文献
4.
Purpose
Morphine ARER is a novel oral, abuse-deterrent, extended-release (ER) formulation of morphine sulfate with physical and chemical properties that deter misuse and abuse by nonoral routes of administration. Here we evaluate the relative bioavailability of morphine ARER and extended-release morphine.Methods
This single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, randomized crossover study in healthy adult subjects compared the relative bioavailability of morphine ARER 100 mg to that of ER morphine 100 mg in the fasted condition. At 12 and 1.5 hours before dosing and 12 hours after dosing, all subjects received a 50-mg oral naltrexone tablet to minimize opioid-related side effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters including the AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax of morphine and its metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were determined at various times up to 48 hours postdose. The bioequivalence of morphine ARER and ER morphine was determined using an ANOVA of the least-squares mean values of morphine and M6G bioavailability.Findings
Forty-nine subjects completed the study. Both morphine ARER and ER morphine exhibited peak plasma morphine and M6G concentrations of ～30 ng/mL and ～200 ng/mL, respectively, at 3 hours postdose. The 90% CIs of the ln-transformed values of morphine AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range for bioequivalence. M6G values also indicated bioequivalence of morphine ARER and ER morphine. The most common adverse events were nausea and somnolence.Implications
These data show that, in these subjects, morphine ARER was bioequivalent to ER morphine, a treatment for pain with well-established efficacy and safety profiles. 相似文献5.
Lin Pan Paula Belloni Han Ting Ding Jianshuang Wang Christopher M. Rubino Wendy S. Putnam 《Advances in therapy》2017,34(9):2071-2082
Introduction
Pirfenidone film-coated tablets were developed to offer an alternative to the marketed capsule formulation. This study assessed the bioequivalence of the tablet and capsule formulations under fed and fasted states.Methods
A Phase I, open-label, randomized, four-treatment-period, four-sequence, crossover pharmacokinetics study (NCT02525484) was conducted. Each subject received an 801-mg single dose of pirfenidone as three 267-mg capsules or one 801-mg tablet under fasted and fed conditions. Pirfenidone plasma C max, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were used to assess bioequivalence.Results
Forty-four subjects were randomized to treatment. The 801-mg tablet in the fasted state met bioequivalence criteria [90% confidence intervals (CI) 80.00–125.00%] for the GLSM ratios of natural log-transformed C max, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞. Under fed conditions, the 801-mg tablet met the bioequivalence criteria for AUC0–t and AUC0–∞, but slightly exceeded the bioequivalence criteria for the C max (90% CI of 108.26–125.60%). The tablet C max was approximately 17% higher than that of the capsules. In the fed state, the tablet C max, and both AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were reduced by 39% and 17%, respectively, relative to the fasted state. The tablet and capsules had acceptable tolerability profiles.Conclusions
The pirfenidone 801-mg tablet met bioequivalence criteria when compared with three 267-mg capsules in the fasted state. The tablet C max was slightly higher relative to capsules in the fed state, but this is not expected to have a clinically meaningful impact on the benefit–risk profile of pirfenidone.Funding
This work was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.6.
Purpose
Somatropin, used to treat growth hormone deficiency, has been traditionally administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection with needle and syringe. Needle-free devices offer ease of administration and may improve adherence and outcomes. This study evaluated the relative bioavailability of somatropin delivered with a needle-free device compared with traditional SC injection.Methods
In this randomized, single-dose, crossover study, healthy adults aged 18 to 35 years received single 4-mg doses of somatropin via a needle-free device or SC injection, along with octreotide to suppress endogenous growth hormone production. Blood samples were analyzed for serum somatropin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations over 24 hours after somatropin dosing. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated by using noncompartmental methods, and bioequivalence was determined based on ln transformation of the AUC0–24, AUC0–∞, Cmax, area under the effect-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUEC0–24), and maximum effect concentration (Emax). Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the needle-free device compared with the SC injection, constructed by using the two 1-sided hypotheses at the α = 0.05 level, for these pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters fell within the 80.00% to125.00% regulatory acceptance range.Findings
A total of 57 subjects completed both study periods and were included in the pharmacokinetic analyses. Point estimates (90% CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (needle-free device/SC injection) based on serum somatropin were 1.013 (0.987–1.040) for AUC0–24, 1.012 (0.986–1.038) for AUC0–∞, and 1.200 (1.137–1.267) for Cmax. For IGF-1, baseline-corrected point estimates (90% CIs) were 0.901 (0.818–0.993) for AUEC0–24 and 0.867 (0.795–0.946) for Emax. Non–baseline-corrected values were 0.978 (0.953–1.004) for AUEC0–24 and 0.953 (0.923–0.984) for Emax. Both treatments were well tolerated; blood glucose levels increased in nearly all subjects (98.3%). All adverse events were mild and resolved spontaneously within 24 hours.Implications
Bioequivalence was shown for a single 4-mg dose of somatropin delivered by using a needle-free device compared with SC injection based on ln-transformed AUC0–24 and AUC0–∞ but not ln-transformed Cmax. 相似文献7.
Xavier Pivot Jean Paul Deslypere Lisa Soyeon Park Michael Jinwoo Kim Wonjae Lee Jeonghyeon Lee 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(3):396-405.e4
Purpose
This first-in-human study of HD201 was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between this biosimilar candidate and trastuzumab sourced in the European Union (EU-trastuzumab)*.Methods
In this randomized, blinded, single-dose comparative PK study, healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 6 mg/kg IV dose of HD201 or EU-trastuzumab. The primary PK end point was AUC0–∞. Equivalence was determined by using the predefined margins of 0.8 to 1.25. Other PK parameters were included as secondary end points.Findings
Baseline demographic characteristics for the 73 randomized subjects were similar across the 2 groups: median age 29 and 30 years old (ranges 19 - 45), median weight 78.6 and 81.7 kg (ranges 60.2 – 101). The 90% CIs for the geometric least squares mean of the AUC0–∞ were included within the margins of 0.8 to 1.25. All other PK parameters were comparable for both HD201 and EU-trastuzumab. The proportions of subjects who experienced adverse events related to the study drug were 61.8% and 82.9% in the HD201 and EU-trastuzumab groups, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events related to the study drug were infusion-related reactions. No subjects had positive results for antidrug antibodies after a single dose.Implications
This study reported the PK equivalence between HD201 and EU-trastuzumab. HD201 was well tolerated with no safety concerns after single-dose administration in healthy male subjects. EudraCT No.: 2012-000805-56. 相似文献8.
Jong-Dai Kim Cheol-Young Park Bong-Yun Cha Kyu Jeung Ahn In Joo Kim Kyong Soo Park Hyung Woo Lee Kyung-Wan Min Jong Chul Won Min Young Chung Jae-Taek Kim Jun Goo Kang Sung-Woo Park 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(5):752-761.e2
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare the adherence of the glimepiride/metformin sustained release (GM-SR) once-daily fixed-dose combination and glimepiride/metformin immediate release (GM-IR) BID fixed-dose combination in type 2 diabetes therapies.Methods
An open-label, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study was conducted at 11 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A total of 168 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with >4 mg of glimepiride and 1000 mg of metformin by using free or fixed-dose combination therapy for at least 2 weeks were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive GM-SR 4/1000 mg once-daily or GM-IR 2/500 mg BID for 24 weeks. Adherence was compared by using the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS).Findings
A significant difference in adherence was observed between the 2 groups. Overall adherence, defined by the number of container openings divided by the number of prescribed doses, was 91.7% in the GM-SR group and 88.6% in the GM-IR group (P < 0.001). The percentage of treatment days with the correct number of doses taken was 85.3% in the GM-SR group and 75.1% in the GM-IR group (P < 0.001). The percentage of missed doses was 11.7% in the GM-SR group and 15.3% in the GM-IR group (P < 0.001). The percentage of doses taken in the correct time window and therapeutic coverage were higher in the GM-SR group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in glycosylated hemoglobin changes or number of adverse events between the 2 groups. A total of 168 patients randomized to receive GM-SR once daily (86 patients) or GM-IR twice daily (82 patients). Mean Age were 57.8 ± 9.6 years old. Male : female ratio was 47.6 : 52.4 %. Body mass index were 66.3 ± 12.0 kg/m2, Diabetes duration were 10.5 ± 6.6 years.Implications
This study showed that patient adherence with GM-SR once daily was significantly better than with GM-IR BID. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01620489. 相似文献9.
Tommy Tsang Cheung Joanne Wing Yan Chiu Man Fung Yuen Karen Siu Ling Lam Bernard Man Yung Cheung Hwa-Ping Feng Wendy W. Yeh Jiangdian Wang Wenting Li Xu Min Zhao Zaiqi Wang Shengmei Mu 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(5):719-732.e1
Purpose
This study evaluated the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) variables of elbasvir and grazoprevir in healthy Chinese individuals.Methods
This study was a 2-part, parallel-arm, open-label trial. In part 1, single-dose PK variables of elbasvir 10/50/100 mg and grazoprevir 50/100/200 mg were evaluated in 10 participants per drug. In part 2, 10-day multiple-dose PK variables of elbasvir 50 mg and grazoprevir 100 mg administered once daily alone and in combination were evaluated in 12 participants. Summary and inferential statistics of the PK parameters are reported. Elbasvir and grazoprevir PK parameters were also compared between Chinese participants and historical data from white participants.Findings
Single-dose elbasvir and grazoprevir median Tmax were 2.9 to 4.0 and 1.9 to 3.0 hours after administration, respectively. Elbasvir AUC0–∞ and Cmax increased in a dose-proportional manner (slope estimate [90% CI], 0.92 [0.84–1.01] and 0.98 [0.86–1.09], respectively), whereas grazoprevir AUC0–∞ and Cmax increased in a greater-than-dose-proportional manner (slope estimate [90% CI], 1.42 [1.27–1.57] and 1.96 [1.64–2.29]). After repeated administration, the accumulation ratios for AUC0–24, 24-hour concentration, and Cmax were 1.55, 1.57, and 1.38 for elbasvir and 2.03, 1.23, and 2.51 for grazoprevir. Co-administration of elbasvir 50 mg and grazoprevir 100 mg once daily did not have a clinically relevant effect on the PK variables of either drug. Median Tmax after co-administration versus alone was 3.0 hours versus 3.0 hours for elbasvir and 3.1 hours versus 3.0 hours for grazoprevir. Geometric mean ratios (90% CI) for elbasvir and grazoprevir AUC0–24 (Chinese/white participants) were 1.58 (1.03–2.42) and 1.21 (0.76–1.92). Elbasvir and grazoprevir, administered alone or concomitantly, were well tolerated.Implications
In healthy Chinese individuals, administration of elbasvir and grazoprevir, alone or concomitantly, was generally well tolerated, with a thoroughly characterized PK profile. Elbasvir and grazoprevir exposures may trend higher in Chinese healthy participants relative to white healthy participants. Protocol number MK-5172 PN022. 相似文献10.
Purpose
Generic formulations are by far the most prescribed drugs. This scenario is highly beneficial for society because medication expenses are significantly reduced after expiration of the exclusivity period conceded to the branded name drug. Correspondingly, these formulations must be adequately evaluated to avoid drug inefficacy and toxicity in the overall patient population. Bioequivalence studies are the only in vivo evaluation that a generic drug must overcome to reach the market. These clinical trials have not been exempt from underrepresentation of female subjects and a lack of sex-based analysis. Frequently, conclusions obtained in men are extrapolated to women. Furthermore, the obtained results are not analyzed to determine sex differences. The aim of this study was to discuss the effect that male and female differences in gastrointestinal physiology can have on bioequivalence conclusions and to show why a sex-based analysis must be conducted in these studies to improve the evaluation of generic drugs.Methods
This discussion was based on observed sex differences in product bioavailability discrimination (sex-by-formulation interaction) and on residual variability through an analysis of average bioequivalence data previously reported by other researchers and data collected by our center. Bioequivalence studies of oral formulations, with a 2-period, 2-sequence, 2-treatment random crossover design performed in healthy subjects with at least 6 subjects of each sex, were included. In addition, the bioequivalence conclusion that would have been reached in each study if performed with only 1 sex was estimated.Findings
The data reveal that differences in both product bioavailability discrimination and residual variability occur with a significant incidence in bioequivalence studies. In either Cmax or AUC, a significant sex-by-formulation interaction was present in 1 of 3 reviewed studies, whereas differences in residual variability between sexes were significant for >50% of studies. Moreover, the performed estimations suggest that the reported bioequivalence conclusions were not verified in at least 1 sex for 1 of 3 studies and were not verified in men and in women for 1 of 6 studies.Implications
This research shows that extrapolation of bioequivalence results from the male population to the female population is not always valid. Bioequivalence studies must therefore be performed with both male and female subjects in similar proportions. Sex-based analysis in bioequivalence can improve study design, enhance the representativeness of conclusions, and provide important information regarding formulation performance, thereby promoting the efficacy and safety of generic drugs. 相似文献11.
Ignacio Conde-Carmona Sandra García-Medina Juan M. Jiménez-Vargas Alberto Martínez-Muñoz Sung-Hack Lee 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(10):1729-1740
Purpose
The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions between a newly developed dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor, gemigliptin, and metformin in healthy Mexican male volunteers, and the differences in the pharmacokinetic profile of gemigliptin between Korean and Mexican healthy volunteers.Methods
This was a multiple-dose, randomized, open-label, 3-way, 3-period crossover study. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment sequences and received gemigliptin 50mg once a day, metformin1000mg BID, or both drugs during a 7-day treatment period, and underwent sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis and tolerability assessments. Point estimates and 90% CIs of Cmax,ss and AUCτ,ss least squares mean (LSM) ratios of the concurrent administration of gemigliptin?+?metformin to the administration of monotherapy with either drug were obtained, and the pharmacokinetic profile of gemigliptin observed was compared with that in healthy Korean volunteers studied during the initial development of gemigliptin.Findings
The coadministration of gemigliptin?+?metformin did not affect the pharmacokinetic characteristics of gemigliptin (LSM ratio [90% CI] for Cmax,ss and AUCτ,ss: 0.98 [0.87–1.10] and 0.94 [0.91–0.98], respectively) or metformin (LSM ratio [90% CI] for Cmax,ss and AUCτ,ss: 0.97 [0.88–1.08] and 1.02 [0.93–1.12], respectively) when administered as monotherapy and was well tolerated. In contrast with Korean healthy volunteers, Mexican subjects showed a modestly higher gemigliptin exposure (LSM ratio [90% CI] for AUCτ,ss: 1.22 [1.14–1.31]).Implications
The results of this study support, in ethnically different populations, the absence of drug–drug interactions between gemigliptin and metformin previously shown in Korean healthy volunteers. Considering the flat effect–concentration curve and wide therapeutic range of gemigliptin, the pharmacokinetic profile of gemigliptin observed in healthy Mexican and Korean subjects suggests that gemigliptin use in Mexican patients may be associated with outcomes, in terms of efficacy and tolerability, similar to those observed in the Korean population. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03310749. 相似文献12.
Purpose
The ability of sophisticated sensors and medical devices to monitor critical biomarkers has the potential to greatly advance precision medicine initiatives. A stakeholder event was organized to develop working models for the evolution of the field.Methods
A workshop devoted to the subject matter was held at the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute involving clinicians, device developers, regulators, engineers, and scientists.Findings
Several areas for collaborative development were identified and interested teams offered resources for development of research programs.Implications
The diversity of relevant stakeholders presents a major opportunity and challenge in translational research. It is evident that the CTSI national network can take a leadership role in the rapidly advancing and potentially transformative field of digital biomarkers. 相似文献13.
Ju-Hee Ryu Joo-Il Kim Hyung Son Kim Gyu-Jeong Noh Kyung-Tae Lee Eun Kyoung Chung 《Clinical therapeutics》2017,39(1):138-149
Purpose
Pelubiprofen is a novel nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic drug with at least similar efficacy and better tolerability compared with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic drugs such as naproxen and aceclofenac. Eperisone hydrochloride is a centrally acting muscle relaxant that performs by blocking calcium channels. The combined use of pelubiprofen and eperisone hydrochloride is increasingly anticipated to promote the clinical effectiveness of pelubiprofen in relieving musculoskeletal symptoms of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and low back pain. No published data are yet available, however, regarding the pharmacokinetic interactions between these 2 drugs when administered concurrently. The objective of this study was to evaluate any pharmacokinetic interactions between pelubiprofen and eperisone hydrochloride in healthy Korean male volunteers.Methods
This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Each participant was randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatment sequences and orally received either 45-mg sustained-release pelubiprofen, 75-mg sustained-release eperisone hydrochloride, or both as a single dose in each treatment period, with a 7-day washout period between each treatment. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations of each drug and the major active metabolite of pelubiprofen (trans-alcohol pelubiprofen) were determined by using a validated HPLC-MS/MS system. Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted by using noncompartmental methods.Findings
A total of 24 men (mean ± standard deviation of: age, 29 ± 4 years; weight, 72.5 ± 7.8 kg; body mass index, 23.4 ± 1.9 kg/m2) were enrolled, and 23 participants completed the study. For pelubiprofen, the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of Cmax and AUC0–∞ were 1.02 (0.87–1.19) and 0.97 (0.88–1.07), respectively. For the major active metabolite of pelubiprofen (trans-alcohol pelubiprofen), the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of Cmax and AUC0–∞ were 1.05 (0.98–1.13) and 1.04 (1.01–1.07). For eperisone, the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of Cmax and AUC0–∞ were 0.87 (0.67–1.15) and 1.05 (0.85–1.30). None of the study participants experienced serious adverse events during the study.Implications
No clinically significant changes were noted in the pharmacokinetic interactions of pelubiprofen, the major active metabolite of pelubiprofen (trans-alcohol pelubiprofen), and eperisone hydrochloride between monotherapy and combination therapy with 45-mg sustained-release pelubiprofen and 75-mg sustained-release eperisone hydrochloride. 相似文献14.
Xiaojie Wu Yunfei Li Jing Zhang Yingyuan Zhang Jicheng Yu Guoying Cao Yuancheng Chen Beining Guo Yaoguo Shi Jun Huang Yuran Cao Xiaofang Liu Jufang Wu Mikhail Fedorovich Gordeev Hong Yuan Wen Wang 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(2):322-332.e5
Purpose
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of MRX-I tablet, an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent, in healthy Chinese subjects.Methods
The study was composed of 3 sequential periods. Period 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential ascending dose (50 to 1800 mg) study. Period 2 included one arm as a randomized, open-label, 3-period, 3 × 3 Latin square single-dose study of 300, 600, and 900 mg MRX-I administration and another arm as a crossover study to evaluate high-fat diet effect. Period 3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multiple-dose study with 600 or 800 mg, q12h regimens over 15 days.Findings
MRX-I was rapidly absorbed and reached peak plasma concentration at about 2 hours post dose. The Cmax was 8.07, 12.24, and 15.25 mg/L and the corresponding AUC0?∞ 29.21, 48.27, and 59.60 mg/h/L, in 300-, 600-, and 900-mg dosing groups, respectively. High-fat diet increased the exposure of MRX-I. No discernable drug accumulation was observed after 15 days of continuous drug administration. About 2% of MRX-I was excreted via kidneys in unchanged form. No obvious hematologic toxicity by MRX-I was observed during the entire study. Based on Monte Carlo simulation, 600 or 800 mg BID can produce satisfactory efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Implications
MRX-I was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects (50–1800 mg). No serious or severe adverse effects were observed. MRX-I 600 or 800 mg BID up to 15 days can be recommended in future clinical trials. Chinese Clinical Trial Registration (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn) identifier: CTR20131214. 相似文献15.
Caiyun Zhao Yuan Lv Xiangyan Li Fang Hou Xuzhu Ma Minji Wei Zisheng Kang Lanqing Cui Yahong Xia Yan Liu Jihong Tian 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(6):983-992
Purpose
Nemonoxacin, a nonfluorinated quinolone, has been approved in Taiwan and mainland China for the treatment of bacterial infection. Whether nemonoxacin is associated with the adverse events of other quinolones, such as the risk for QT-interval prolongation, which has led to the withdrawal of several fluoroquinolones from the market, needs to be elucidated.Methods
The effects of nemonoxacin on thorough QT/QTc interval was investigated in this randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled crossover study conducted according to the International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guideline. Forty-eight healthy adults received a single oral dose of nemonoxacin 500 mg (therapeutic dose), nemonoxacin 750 mg (supratherapeutic dose), moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control), or placebo in 1 of 4 cohorts (Williams Latin square design) in the fasted condition. After a 7-day washout, 6 male and 6 female subjects were orally administered a 500-mg dose of nemonoxacin after high-fat food intake. The primary end point was the change in QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia formula (QTcF). The secondary end point was the change in QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Bazett formula (QTcB).Findings
The study revealed that nemonoxacin was classified as not likely dangerous at the therapeutic dose (500 mg) and as potentially dangerous at the supratherapeutic dose (750 mg). The Tmax of nemonoxacin was 1 to 2 hours after administration, and the elimination half-life was 5 to 7 hours, in the fasted conditions. High-fat food intake had significant effects on the Tmax, Cmax, AUC0–∞, and QT/QTc interval of nemonoxacin compared with these values in the fasted condition. A correlation between QTcF and the plasma drug concentration of nemonoxacin was not observed.Implications
Nemonoxacin at the clinically therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses had a prolongation effect on QT/QTc. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03362853. 相似文献16.
Rahul P. Patel Jilson Jacob Mohammed Sedeeq Long Chiau Ming Troy Wanandy Syed Tabish R. Zaidi Gregory M. Peterson 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(4):664-667
Purpose
The aim was to investigate the stability of cefazolin in elastomeric infusion devices.Methods
Elastomeric devices (Infusor LV) that contain cefazolin (3 g/240 mL and 6 g/240 mL) were prepared and stored at 4°C for 72 hours and then at 35°C for 12 hours, followed by 25°C for 12 hours. An aliquot was withdrawn at predefined time points and analyzed for the concentration of cefazolin. Samples were also assessed for changes in pH, solution color, and particle content.Findings
Cefazolin retained acceptable chemical and physical stability over the studied storage period and conditions.Implications
These findings will allow the administration of cefazolin by the Infusor LV elastomeric device in the outpatient and remote settings. 相似文献17.
Purpose
Our aim was to develop and validate the extrapolative performance of a regression model using a limited sampling strategy for accurate estimation of the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve for saroglitazar.Methods
Healthy subject pharmacokinetic data from a well-powered food-effect study (fasted vs fed treatments; n = 50) was used in this work. The first 25 subjects’ serial plasma concentration data up to 72 hours and corresponding AUC0?t (ie, 72 hours) from the fasting group comprised a training dataset to develop the limited sampling model. The internal datasets for prediction included the remaining 25 subjects from the fasting group and all 50 subjects from the fed condition of the same study. The external datasets included pharmacokinetic data for saroglitazar from previous single-dose clinical studies. Limited sampling models were composed of 1-, 2-, and 3-concentration?time points’ correlation with AUC0?t of saroglitazar. Only models with regression coefficients (R2) >0.90 were screened for further evaluation. The best R2 model was validated for its utility based on mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error, and root mean square error. Both correlations between predicted and observed AUC0?t of saroglitazar and verification of precision and bias using Bland?Altman plot were carried out.Findings
None of the evaluated 1- and 2-concentration?time points models achieved R2 > 0.90. Among the various 3-concentration?time points models, only 4 equations passed the predefined criterion of R2 > 0.90. Limited sampling models with time points 0.5, 2, and 8 hours (R2 = 0.9323) and 0.75, 2, and 8 hours (R2 = 0.9375) were validated. Mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error, and root mean square error were <30% (predefined criterion) and correlation (r) was at least 0.7950 for the consolidated internal and external datasets of 102 healthy subjects for the AUC0?t prediction of saroglitazar. The same models, when applied to the AUC0?t prediction of saroglitazar sulfoxide, showed mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error, and root mean square error <30% and correlation (r) was at least 0.9339 in the same pool of healthy subjects.Implications
A 3-concentration?time points limited sampling model predicts the exposure of saroglitazar (ie, AUC0?t) within predefined acceptable bias and imprecision limit. Same model was also used to predict AUC0?∞. The same limited sampling model was found to predict the exposure of saroglitazar sulfoxide within predefined criteria. This model can find utility during late-phase clinical development of saroglitazar in the patient population. 相似文献18.
Introduction
Clopacin® (Acino Pharma AG) is a proprietary, besylate salt and lactose-free formulation of the widely-used anti-platelet treatment, clopidogrel. This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of Clopacin® with the originator as reference drug, using a guideline-compliant trial design: open-labeled, randomized, single-dose (clopidogrel 75 mg tablet), two-period, crossover trial in 48 healthy male volunteers, with a 7 day wash-out period.Methods
Plasma samples were collected at intervals and extracted before quantifying clopidogrel concentrations using a fully validated LC–MS/MS method. Bioequivalence of Clopacin® and the reference drug was established by comparison of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters, C max, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞.Results
The parameter values were similar for the two products (analysis of variance) and provided Clopacin/reference ratios (least squares means) of >90% and 90% confidence intervals (CIs 84.64–105.50%, 90.43–111.22%, 88.75–110.71%, respectively) that were well within the limits set for defining bioequivalence, according to international guidelines. The respective Clopacin® and reference drug values for mean time to maximal plasma clopidogrel concentration (t max) were 0.83 and 0.91 h, and for terminal elimination half-life were 3.99 and 3.51 h. The intra-subject coefficients of variability for maximal plasma clopidogrel concentration (C max), area under the plasma clopidogrel concentration versus time curve, at 48 h (AUC0–t) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0–∞) were 32.2%, 30.2%, and 28.9% (least square means), respectively, and the respective power values were 99.5%, 97.1%, and 95.3%.Conclusion
This bioequivalence study provided robust clopidogrel pharmacokinetic data that established the bioequivalence of Clopacin® and the reference originator drug.Funding
Acino Pharma AG (formerly Cimex AG)19.
Mohit Kumar Adam Chapman Saad Javed Uazman Alam Rayaz A Malik Shazli Azmi 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(6):850-861
Purpose
This review provides an update on the investigations and treatment options for gastroparesis.Methods
A comprehensive literature search of Medline, PubMed, Embase and OVID was conducted which included all systematic reviews and research articles that focused on the diagnosis, investigations and management diabetic gastroparesis.Findings
Dietary modifications and pharmacologic treatment with prokinetics to increase gastric motility form the mainstay of treatment. However, the use of prokinetics is limited by adverse effects and serious adverse effects, leaving metoclopramide as the only drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of gastroparesis. Newer therapies, including motilin receptor agonists, ghrelin receptor agonists, and neurokinin receptor antagonists, are currently being investigated. Transpyloric stenting, gastric electrical stimulation, and gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy provide mechanical options for intervention, and surgical interventions in severe intractable gastroparesis include laparoscopic pyloroplasty or gastrectomy.Implications
Advances to better understand the pathophysiology and management of diabetic gastroparesis have been limited, especially with discordance between symptoms and severity of delay in gastric emptying. Established treatment options are limited; however, recent pharmacologic and surgical interventions show promise. 相似文献20.
Crista Johnson-Agbakwu Louise Brown James Yuan Robert Kissling David J. Greenblatt 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(1):64-73