Competency in chest radiography

BACKGROUND: Accurate interpretation of chest radiographs (CXR) is essential as clinical decisions depend on readings. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate CXR interpretation ability at different levels of training and to determine factors associated with successful interpretation. DESIGN: Ten CXR were selected from the teaching file of the internal medicine (IM) department. Participants were asked to record the most important diagnosis, their certainty in that diagnosis, interest in a pulmonary career and adequacy of CXR training. Two investigators independently scored each CXR on a scale of 0 to 2. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n=145) from a single teaching hospital were third year medical students (MS) (n=25), IM interns (n=44), IM residents (n=45), fellows from the divisions of cardiology and pulmonary/critical care (n=16), and radiology residents (n=15). RESULTS: The median overall score was 11 of 20. An increased level of training was associated with overall score (MS 8, intern 10, IM resident 13, fellow 15, radiology resident 18, P<.001). Overall certainty was significantly correlated with overall score (r=.613, P<.001). Internal medicine interns and residents interested in a pulmonary career scored 14 of 20 while those not interested scored 11 (P=.027). Pneumothorax, misplaced central line, and pneumoperitoneum were diagnosed correctly 9%, 26%, and 46% of the time, respectively. Only 20 of 131 (15%) participants felt their CXR training sufficient. CONCLUSION: We identified factors associated with successful CXR interpretation, including level of training, field of training, interest in a pulmonary career and overall certainty. Although interpretation improved with training, important diagnoses were missed.     

Do specialists differ on do-not-resuscitate decisions?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Opinions regarding do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions differ between individual physicians. We attempted to determine whether the strength of DNR recommendations varies with medical specialty and experience. DESIGN: Written survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians from the pulmonary/critical-care medicine (PCCM), cardiology, internal medicine, gastroenterology, hematology/oncology, and infectious disease services as well as the Department of Medicine house staff at our tertiary-care referral center participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Physicians were asked confidentially to quantify the strength of their opinions on discussing and recommending DNR orders for each of 20 vignettes made from the summaries of actual cases. Reasons for their opinions and demographic data also were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifteen of 155 physicians (74%) responded. PCCM physicians (mean [+/- SD] DNR score, 157 +/- 22) more strongly recommended DNR orders than cardiologists (mean DNR score, 122 +/- 32; p = 0.006), house staff (mean DNR score, 132 +/- 24; p = 0.014), and general internists (mean DNR score, 129 +/- 30; p = 0.043). PCCM physicians also trended toward recommending DNR orders for more of the 20 patients described in the vignettes compared to cardiologists (mean DNR number, 16.5 +/- 3.0 vs 11.9 +/- 5.8, respectively; p = 0.066). There were no differences between PCCM physicians and hematology/oncology, infectious disease, and gastroenterology specialists. Among the house staff, the likelihood of recommending a DNR order correlated significantly with increasing years of experience (r = 0.45; p = 0.002). The opposite trend was present in the specialty staff groups. No significant differences in opinion by gender, religion, or personal experiences were found. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of DNR order recommendations varies with medicine specialty and years of training and experience. An awareness of these differences and the determination of the reasons behind them may help to target educational interventions and to ensure effective collaboration with colleagues and communication with patients.     

Geriatric medicine fellowship programs: a national study from the Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs' Longitudinal Study of Training and Practice in Geriatric Medicine

This report documents the development and growth of geriatric medicine fellowship training in the United States through 2002. A cross-sectional survey of geriatric medicine fellowship programs was conducted in the fall 2001. All allopathic (119) and osteopathic (7) accredited geriatric medicine fellowship-training programs in the United States were involved. Data were collected using self-administered mailed and Web-based survey instruments. Longitudinal data from the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC) National Graduate Medical Education (GME) Census, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) were also analyzed. The survey instrument was designed to gather data about faculty, fellows, program curricula, and program directors (PDs). In addition, annual AMA/AAMC data from 1991 to the present was compiled to examine trends in the number of fellowship programs and the number of fellows. The overall survey response rate was 76% (96 of 126 PDs). Most (54%) of the PDs had been in their current position 4 or more years (range: <1-20 years), and 59% of PDs reported that they had completed formal geriatric medicine fellowship training. The number of fellowship programs and the number of fellows entering programs has slowly increased over the past decade. During 2001-02, 338 fellows were training in allopathic programs and seven in osteopathic programs (all years of training). Forty-six percent (n = 44) of responding programs offered only 1-year fellowship-training experiences. PDs reported that application rates for fellowship positions were stable during the academic years (AYs) 1999-2002, with the median number of applications per first year position available in AY 2000-01 being 10 (range: 1-77). In 2001-02, data from the AMA/AAMC National GME Census indicated a fill rate for first-year geriatric medicine fellowship positions of 69% (259 first-year fellows for 373 positions). During 2001-02, more than half of programs (53%) reported having two or fewer first-year fellows, whereas 31% had three or four first-year fellows. Thirty-three programs (36%) reported having no U.S. medical school graduate first-year fellows, and another 25 (28%) reported having only one. Of the 51 programs offering second-year fellowship training, PDs reported 61 post-first-year fellows (median 1, range: 0-7). During the past 10 years, 27 new allopathic geriatric medicine fellowship programs opened; there are now 119 programs. There are also seven osteopathic programs. The recruitment of high-quality U.S. medical school graduates into these programs remains a challenge for the discipline. Furthermore, the retention of first-year fellows for additional years of academic training has been difficult. Incentives will be needed to attract the best graduates of U.S. family practice and internal medicine training programs into academic careers in geriatric medicine.     

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: X. Internal medicine residency and fellowship training: 1985 update

The number of medical school graduates entering internal medicine residency training was at an all-time high in 1984-85. Although the number of first-year residents who were foreign-trained physicians did not differ greatly from the 1983-84 census, the number of first-year residents who were U.S. medical school graduates was much higher than the previous year largely because the number of graduates from U.S. medical schools increased substantially in 1984. The number of internal medicine fellowship programs and the number of fellows in 1984-85 were also at an all-time high. Foreign-trained physicians represent 22% of those in residency training and 20% of those in fellowship training. Of every 100 who completed residency training, 61 went on to a first year of subspecialty fellowship training, a number up slightly from the previous year. The increasing numbers of residents and fellows being trained in internal medicine, combined with the preference for subspecialization and the substantial proportion of foreign-trained physicians being trained, are discussed against the background of pending legislation to reduce federal assistance for graduate medical education.     

Factors predicting initial career choices in gastroenterology fellows

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: As academic gastroenterology (GI) fellowship programs often gear trainee recruitment to those displaying potential for academic careers, the aim of the study was to determine whether predictive factors exist that determine whether GI fellows pursue academia versus private practice. STUDY: Educational file review was conducted on all GI fellows from Mayo Clinic-Rochester from 1990 through 2003, with demographic variables extracted. The outcome of interest was whether the first job after fellowship was in academics or private practice. RESULTS: Of 92 fellows completing training, 60 accepted academic positions (65%) (P=0.005, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.74), whereas 32 (35%) pursued private practice. Those of Asian descent were significantly more likely to enter academics versus those of African American (P=0.02) or Hispanic (P=0.01) descent. There were nonsignificant trends of more women than men (85% vs. 62%), military than non-military (86% vs. 63%), bachelors of arts than science degrees (70% vs. 50%) and advanced fellowship training than not (74% vs. 61%) going into academics. There was no significant difference in career choices between fellows entering the National Institutes of Health training tract versus the Clinical Scholar or Clinical Investigator tracts. There were no significant associations between age, marital status, hometown population, foreign medical degree, research mentor factors or type of research during fellowship and practice choice. CONCLUSIONS: Although there seem to be predictive variables in determining whether GI fellows enter private practice or academia, the initial practice choice likely results from multiple combined factors.     

National survey of geriatric medicine fellowship programs: comparing findings in 2006/07 and 2001/02 from the American Geriatrics Society and Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs Geriatrics Workforce Policy Studies Center

This article documents the development of geriatric medicine fellowship training in the United States through 2009. Results from a national cross-sectional survey of all geriatric medicine fellowship training programs conducted in 2007 is compared with results from a similar survey in 2002. Secondary data sources were used to supplement the survey results. The 2007 survey response rate was 71%. Sixty-seven percent of responding programs directors have completed formal geriatric medicine fellowship training and are board certified in geriatrics, and 29% are board certified through the practice pathway. The number of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited fellowship programs has slowly increased, from 120 (23 family medicine (FM) and 97 internal medicine (IM)) in 2001/02 to 145 in 2008/09 (40 FM and 105 IM), resulting in a 21% increase in fellowship programs and a 13% increase in the number of first-year fellows (259 to 293). In 2008/09, the growth in programs and first-year slots, combined with the weak demand for geriatrics training, resulted in more than one-third of first-year fellow positions being unfilled. The number of advanced fellows decreased slightly from 72 in 2001/00 to 65 in 2006/07. In 2006/07, 55% of the advanced fellows were enrolled at four training programs. In 2008/09, 66% of fellows were international medical school graduates. The small numbers of graduating geriatric medicine fellows are insufficient to care for the expanding population of older frail patients, train other disciples in the care of complex older adults, conduct research in aging, and be leaders in the field.     

Teaching Geriatric Fellows How to Teach: A Needs Assessment Targeting Geriatrics Fellowship Program Directors

The entire healthcare workforce needs to be educated to better care for older adults. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fellows are being trained to teach, to assess the attitudes of fellowship directors toward training fellows to be teachers, and to understand how to facilitate this type of training for fellows. A nine‐question survey adapted from a 2001 survey issued to residency program directors inquiring about residents‐as‐teachers curricula was developed and administered. The survey was issued electronically and sent out three times over a 6‐week period. Of 144 ACGME‐accredited geriatric fellowship directors from geriatric, internal medicine, and family medicine departments who were e‐mailed the survey, 101 (70%) responded; 75% had an academic affiliation, 15% had a community affiliation, and 10% did not report. Academic and community programs required their fellows to teach, but just 55% of academic and 29% of community programs offered teaching skills instruction as part of their fellowship curriculum; 67% of academic programs and 79% of community programs felt that their fellows would benefit from more teaching skill instruction. Program directors listed fellow (39%) and faculty (46%) time constraints as obstacles to creation and implementation of a teaching curriculum. The majority of fellowship directors believe that it is important for geriatric fellows to become competent educators, but only approximately half of programs currently provide formal instruction in teaching skills. A reproducible, accessible curriculum on teaching to teach that includes a rigorous evaluation component should be created for geriatrics fellowship programs.     

National study of internal medicine manpower: IV. Residency and fellowship training 1977-1978 and 1978-1979.

The National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower gathered data on the number of residents in training in internal medicine and the number of fellows in subspecialty training, for 1977-1978 and for 1978-1979. In the latter period, there were 16720 residents in all years of training. The 7.2% average annual increase in the number of first-year residents during the earlier half of the 1970s slowed in 1977-1978 and 1978-1979 to 4.6% and 4.2%, respectively, reflecting a similar decline in the number of medical school graduates. The most important finding of the study is that the steep rise (10.6% per year) in the number of subspecialty fellowship trainees characteristic of the years 1972-1973 through 1976-1977 has abated. The number of fellows in subspecialty training has remained essentially constant in the past 2 years. Thus, although the number of residents continued to increase and the number of fellows remained constant, the number (and percentage) of internists in training who intend to practice general internal medicine rose.     

Bronchoscopy training: current fellows' experiences and some concerns for the future

OBJECTIVES: To determine current pulmonary fellows' perspectives about their bronchoscopy training. DESIGN: Survey of 59 pulmonary fellows selected by training program directors to represent their institutions. SETTING: "Hands-on" symposium at the CHEST 1998 annual meeting, Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: Fellows reported a mean (+/- SD) of 2.4+/- 0.7 years of training, estimated they had performed 77.7+/-34 bronchoscopies per year, and had generally high estimates of their bronchoscopy proficiency and training. Proficiency estimates correlated with number of procedures cited (r = 0.43, p = 0.001) or level of fellowship training (r = 0.40, p = 0.002). Proficiency ratings (r = 0.63, p = 0.0001) and procedure numbers (r = 0.45, p-0. 0004) correlated with program quality ratings. Approaches to bronchoscopy instruction varied, and most often consisted of one-to-one instruction by faculty (92.5%), lecture-based instruction (74.6%), and case discussions (72.9%). Use of bronchoscopy lectures (p = 0.008) or videos (p = 0.057) were associated with higher self-estimates of proficiency, whereas use of lectures (p = 0.002), a bronchoscopy text (p = 0.009), and one-on-one instruction (p = 0.05) were associated with more highly ranked programs. Major components of training varied among programs. Although most fellows had received instruction encompassed in basic bronchoscopy, fewer had experience with bronchoscopic intubation (71.2%), transbronchial needle aspiration (72.9%), quantitative bacterial culture (64.4%), stent placement (27.1%), laser photocoagulation (25.4%), or cryotherapy (6.8%). Components of bronchoscopy experiences correlated with fellows' estimates of bronchoscopy proficiency and program quality. CONCLUSIONS: Approaches to bronchoscopy instruction and the components of bronchoscopy experiences vary considerably among institutions and are associated with pulmonary fellows' perceptions of bronchoscopy proficiency and training program quality. Definition of an optimum bronchoscopy curriculum remains necessary.     

Gender disparity in the practice of gastroenterology: the first 5 years of a career

BACKGROUND: Despite an unprecedented demand for gastroenterology services, the number of gastroenterology trainees has decreased over 50% since 1993. Women comprise nearly 50% of the U.S. medical school student population; yet only occupy 16% of gastroenterology fellowship positions. In order to recruit the best candidates to gastroenterology we must be able to demonstrate the attractiveness of a career in the field. A prospective study was performed to identify the career choices of graduates from gastroenterology fellowship programs using a prospective study model and to identify whether gender differences exist in the practice of gastroenterologists up to 5 yr after completion of training. METHODS: A survey gathering information on demographics, practice pattern, and income was mailed to two cohorts of gastroenterology fellows 3 and 5 yr after graduation. RESULTS: A total of 247 subjects completed the 3 yr and 220 subjects responded to the 5-yr survey. At 3 yr, men reported higher income (p < 0.001), worked longer hours per week (p < 0.002), and were more likely to be part owner of the practice (p= 0.027). Females reported fewer children (p < 0.007), lower board certification rates (p < 0. 002), worked for larger, multispecialty practices (p < 0.001), and practiced more internal medicine. These differences were still present at 5 yr into gastroenterology practice. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in practice type, earnings, board certification, professional standing, and alterations in family planning are noted between male and female gastroenterologists in the initial 5 yr of their practice.     

Association of Women Leaders with Women Program Director and Trainee Representation Across US Academic Internal Medicine

BackgroundWomen are underrepresented within internal medicine (IM). Whether women leaders attract women trainees is not well explored.ObjectiveTo characterize leader and trainee gender across US academic IM and to investigate the association of leader gender with trainee gender.DesignCross-sectional study.ParticipantsLeaders (chairs, chiefs, program directors (PDs)) in 2018 and trainees (residents, fellows) in 2012–2016 at medical school-affiliated IM and seven IM fellowship programs.ExposureLeadership (chair/chief and program director; and, for resident analyses, fellow) gender.Main MeasuresOur primary outcome was percent women trainees (IM residents and, separately, subspecialty fellows). We used standard statistics to describe leadership and trainee gender. We created separate multivariable linear regressions to evaluate associations of leader gender and percent women fellows with percent women IM residents. We then created separate multivariable multilevel models (site as a random effect) to evaluate associations of leader gender with percent women subspecialty fellows.Key ResultsOur cohort consisted of 940 programs. Women were 13.4% of IM chairs and <25% of chiefs in each fellowship subspecialty (cardiology: 2.6%; gastroenterology: 6.6%; pulmonary and critical care: 10.7%; nephrology: 14.4%; endocrinology: 20.6%; hematology-oncology: 23.2%; infectious diseases: 24.3%). IM PDs were 39.7% women; fellowship PDs ranged from nearly 25% (cardiology and gastroenterology) to nearly 50% (endocrinology and infectious disease) women. Having more women fellows (but not chairs or PDs) was associated with having more women residents (0.3% (95% CI: 0.2–0.5%) increase per 1% fellow increase, p<0.001); this association remained after adjustment (0.3% (0.1%, 0.4%), p=0.001). In unadjusted analyses, having a woman PD (increase of 7.7% (4.7%, 10.6%), p<0.001) or chief (increase of 8.9% (4.6%, 13.1%), p<0.001) was associated with an increase in women fellows; after adjustment, these associations were lost.ConclusionsWomen held a minority of leadership positions in academic IM. Having women leaders was not independently associated with having more women trainees.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07635-w.KEY WORDS: women, faculty, graduate medical education, internal medicine, academic medical centers     

Integrating general medicine and rheumatology training in the outpatient setting

The authors describe a primary care-based educational and practice model that integrates general medicine resident education in outpatient rheumatology with specialty fellowship training. Compared with the use of traditional specialty clinics, the model provides better access and service to patients and more appropriate training for residents. Revenues from clinical service delivered by facultysupervised residents and fellows support 80% of the operating costs and educational activities of the model. The conceptual framework for the model reconciles the educational goals and practice philosophies of general medicine and specialty training and is applicable to training in other predominantly outpatient specialty areas.     

Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe how internal medicine residency programs fulfill the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) scholarly activity training requirement including the current context of resident scholarly work, and 2) to compare findings between university and nonuniversity programs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: ACGME-accredited internal medicine residency programs. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residency program directors. MEASUREMENTS: Data were collected on 1) interpretation of the scholarly activity requirement, 2) support for resident scholarship, 3) scholarly activities of residents, 4) attitudes toward resident research, and 5) program characteristics. University and nonuniversity programs were compared. MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 78%. Most residents completed a topic review with presentation (median, 100%) to fulfill the requirement. Residents at nonuniversity programs were more likely to complete case reports (median, 40% vs 25%; P=.04) and present at local or regional meetings (median, 25% vs 20%; P=.01), and were just as likely to conduct hypothesis-driven research (median, 20% vs 20%; P=.75) and present nationally (median, 10% vs 5%; P=.10) as residents at university programs. Nonuniversity programs were more likely to report lack of faculty mentors (61% vs 31%; P<.001) and resident interest (55% vs 40%; P=.01) as major barriers to resident scholarship. Programs support resident scholarship through research curricula (47%), funding (46%), and protected time (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents complete a variety of projects to fulfill the scholarly activity requirement. Nonuniversity programs are doing as much as university programs in meeting the requirement and supporting resident scholarship despite reporting significant barriers.     

The effects of work-hour limitations on resident well-being, patient care, and education in an internal medicine residency program

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour limitations (WHLs) were implemented in July 2003. Effects on resident well-being, patient care, and education are not well understood. We investigated these effects of WHLs. METHODS: Self-administered survey of internal medicine residents in a university-based residency program in Seattle, Wash. Part of this survey was identical to one completed at our institution in 2001, permitting comparison of burnout, career satisfaction, and depression before and after WHLs. We surveyed 161 internal medicine residents, with 118 respondents (response rate, 73%). We measured resident well-being using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, a validated screening questionnaire for depression, and a previously described questionnaire for career satisfaction. We developed questions about overall agreement with implementation of WHLs and effects on resident well-being, patient care, and education. RESULTS: Comparison with the 2001 survey demonstrated an increase in the proportion of residents satisfied with their career (66% to 80%; P = .02) and a decrease in the proportion meeting criteria for emotional exhaustion (53% to 40%; P = .05). Slightly more residents reported a negative effect of WHLs on patient care (37%) than they did a positive (29%) or a neutral (34%) effect, and more reported a negative effect on their education (47%) than they did a positive (32%) or a neutral (21%) effect. Overall, most residents (65%) approved of WHLs. CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents approve of WHLs overall and report benefits to their well-being. However, they also report negative effects on patient care and resident education.     

Factors influencing resident career choices in emergency medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of residents in emergency medicine regarding a career in academics. DESIGN: A 22-item questionnaire was administered to residents in conjunction with the yearly American Board of Emergency Medicine inservice examination. Demographic information and factors influencing career intent were elicited. Respondents were classified by intent on a career in emergency medicine. A three-way analysis of variance was used to address group differences for eight specific factors impacting on career decision. Chi-square analysis was used to address questions involving relationships among variables with dichotomous or categorical responses. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 1,654 residents, and 1,238 (75%) completed the questionnaire. Motivating factors demonstrating significant differences between those residents planning an academic career and those not interested in academe were a desire to do research, desire to teach, desire to make a contribution to medicine, and exposure to role models, with less emphasis on the need for free time for other interests and less concern regarding practice location. More than 80% of those not going into academic emergency medicine believed they were adequately exposed to research in residency compared with 65% of those intent on a career in academe (P less than .01). Research in medical school, residency, and authorship of a research paper were significantly more prevalent for those residents desiring a career in academe (P less than .01). Twenty-six percent of residents responded that their role models for research were less than adequate. Seventeen percent of residents intend to take fellowship training. The most popular fields for fellowships were toxicology (25%), emergency medical services (21%), pediatrics (15%), and research (9%). CONCLUSION: The results of this survey address attitudes among residents toward a career in academic emergency medicine. Factors such as motivation, role models, and exposure to research may help academicians plan strategies to meet the future needs of academic emergency medicine.     

The safety of bronchoscopy in a pulmonary fellowship program

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the complication rate from supervised training bronchoscopy in a single pulmonary fellowship program, and to examine the effects of fellow and faculty experience on this complication rate. DESIGN: A retrospective review of preexisting quality improvement data from one center for the time period July 1, 1991, until June 30, 2005, was performed. The data were stratified based on the fellow year group and the staff experience level. The types of complications were recorded. SETTING: The study was performed at an accredited pulmonary and critical care fellowship program at a military medical center in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows and 20 staff supervising physicians performed the bronchoscopies that were included in this study. RESULTS: A total of 3,538 training bronchoscopies were performed during the study period with 73 complications for a complication rate of 2.06%. The most common complication was pneumothorax. The overall complication rates for first-year fellows (1stYFs), second-year fellows, and third-year fellows were not significantly different from the total complication rate. Training bronchoscopies supervised by junior staff had a complication rate not significantly different from that of senior staff. The cumulative complication rate for the first trimester for 1stYFs was 3.1%, whereas the cumulative complication rate for the second plus the third trimester for 1stYFs was 1.57% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Training bronchoscopy performed during a pulmonary fellowship is a safe procedure in a supervised setting. Patients undergoing bronchoscopy performed by novice bronchoscopists have an increased complication rate during the first trimester of bronchoscopist training.     

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY TRAINING IN AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE. Opinions of Recent and Current Rheumatology Fellows About an Extended Fellowship in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Objective. To estimate among recent and current rheumatology fellows the appeal of a 3-year rheumatology fellowship emphasizing musculoskeletal medicine. Methods. A survey of 348 trainee members of the American College of Rheumatology during 1990–1993, by mailed questionnaire. Results. The response rate was 77.8% (n = 271). Both recent and current fellows indicated that they desired more experience in musculoskeletal medicine. Most notably, 50% of current fellows, and a significantly higher proportion of recent fellows (70%; P < 0.005), indicated that they would have opted for a 3-year fellowship in musculoskeletal medicine had one been available to them at the completion of their residency. Conclusion. Expertise in musculoskeletal medicine is desired by a sufficient proportion of recent and current rheumatology fellows to warrant the investment in another year of training.     

Teaching of pulmonary auscultation in pediatrics: a nationwide survey of all U.S. accredited residencies

Structured teaching of pulmonary auscultation is greatly underrepresented during internal medicine (IM) or family practice (FP) training. It is not known, however, whether this underrepresentation applies to the other major field of primary care, pediatrics. To answer this question, we surveyed all accredited U.S. residencies in pediatrics by mailing a 1-page questionnaire to 174 pediatrics program directors, and by comparing results to those previously gathered from internal medicine and family practice residencies. Pediatrics directors' response rate was 62%. More pediatrics than family practice residencies offered structured teaching of pulmonary auscultation (21.5% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.004). When compared to internal medicine programs, this difference showed a trend toward significance (21.5% for pediatrics and 14.1%, for internal medicine, P = 0.08). Teaching modalities included: lectures (91.2%); audiotapes (13%); seminars (8.3%); and miscellaneous (21.7%). University-affiliated residencies taught auscultation significantly more frequently than nonuniversity-affiliated programs (25.4% vs.10.5%, P = 0.07). Pediatrics directors gave great importance to pulmonary auscultation, and wished for more time devoted to its teaching (5.52 +/- 0.84 and 5.01 +/- 1.07, respectively, on a 1-6 scale, with 6 indicating the highest value). They also attributed great clinical importance to 13 commonly encountered pulmonary auscultatory events (all rated, on average, between 4-5.8 on a 1-6 scale, with 6 indicating highest importance). In summary, training programs in pediatrics offered significantly more structured teaching of pulmonary auscultation than IM or FP residencies. Whether this difference in teaching may have a beneficial impact on the auscultatory proficiency of pediatric residents, as compared to internal medicine and family practice trainees, needs to be determined.     

Competency in electrocardiogram interpretation among internal medicine and emergency medicine residents

PURPOSE: Accurate interpretation of the electrocardiogram is critical, yet there are no evidence-based guidelines for assessing competency. Our study evaluated the ability of internal medicine residents and emergency medicine residents to interpret a variety of electrocardiograms. METHODS: The 120 participants included 87 internal medicine residents and 33 emergency medicine residents at two hospitals. Participants reported their sex, training level, adequacy of training, career interest in cardiology, and estimated electrocardiogram proficiency. They then took a test containing 12 electrocardiograms and recorded their diagnosis and certainty. Two cardiologists independently established the correct diagnoses. Two blinded, independent graders scored each electrocardiogram (0 = incorrect, 1 = partially correct, 2 = correct). RESULTS: The median proficiency was 6 out of 10, total electrocardiogram score was 15 of 24, and certainty was 33 of 48. There was no significant difference in overall competency between emergency medicine and internal medicine residents (14.0 vs 15.0, P = 0.239). Internal medicine residents interested in a cardiology career scored higher than those not interested in a cardiology career (17.3 vs. 14.1, P = 0.003). When analyzing the most critical diagnoses, we found that the mean score for ventricular tachycardia was 1.6 of 2.0, for myocardial infarction was 1.3 of 2.0, and for complete heart block was 0.8 of 2.0. Over half of the participants felt their electrocardiogram training was inadequate. CONCLUSION: Despite improvement in interpretation with clinical experience, overall performance was low. Research is needed to find optimal methods to improve electrocardiogram competency.