Locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review by receptor phenotype

Molecular subtyping confirms that breast cancer comprises at least four genetically distinct entities based on the expression of specific genes including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2/neu receptor. The quantitative influence of subtype on ipsilateral locoregional recurrence (LRR) is unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically appraise the influence of breast cancer subtype on LRR following breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy. A comprehensive search for studies examining outcomes after BCT and/or mastectomy according to breast cancer subtype was performed using Medline and cross-referencing available data. Reviews of each study were conducted and data extracted to perform meta-analysis. Primary outcome was LRR related to breast cancer subtype. A total of 12,592 breast cancer patients who underwent either BCT (n = 7,174) or mastectomy (n = 5,418) were identified from 15 studies. Patients with luminal subtype tumors (ER/PR +ve) had a lower risk of LRR than both triple-negative (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.23-0.61); and HER2/neu-overexpressing (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.26-0.45) tumors following BCT. Luminal tumors were also less likely to develop LRR than HER2/neu-overexpressing (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.89) or triple-negative tumors (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.46-0.79) after mastectomy. HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors have increased risk of LRR compared to triple-negative tumors (RR 1.44; 95% CI 1.06-1.95) following BCT but there was no difference in LRR between HER2/neu-overexpressing and triple-negative tumors following mastectomy (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.68-1.22). Luminal tumors exhibit the lowest rates of LRR. Patients with triple-negative and HER2/neu-overexpressing breast tumors are at increased risk of developing LRR following BCT or mastectomy. Breast cancer subtype should be taken into account when considering local control and identifies those at increased risk of LRR, who may benefit from more aggressive local treatment.     

Influence of endocrine-related factors on response to perioperative chemotherapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated tumor- and patient-related features that might influence the response to perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) compared with no adjuvant therapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,275 patients were randomized to either no adjuvant treatment (427 patients) or PeCT (848 patients). The following variables thought to have prognostic significance were evaluated: grade, tumor size, estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content (absent; low, 1 to 9 fmol/mg cytosol protein; or positive, > or = 10 fmol/mg cytosol protein), c-erbB-2 overexpression, menopausal status, and age. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relative influence of these factors to predict the effect of PeCT on disease-free survival (DFS). Median follow-up was 13.5 years. RESULTS: The 10-year DFS percentage for 692 premenopausal patients did not significantly differ between the PeCT and no-adjuvant-treatment groups: 61% and 59%, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.20; P = .70). No predictive factors were identified. For 583 postmenopausal patients, 10-year DFS percentages for the groups were 63% and 58%, respectively (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93; P = .03). The absence of expression of ER, PgR, or both ER and PgR was the most important factor predicting improved outcome with PeCT among postmenopausal patients. The 10-year DFS percentages were 85% and 53% for the steroid hormone receptor-absent cohort of treated and untreated patients, respectively (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.49; P = .0009). CONCLUSION: The role of PeCT should be explored for patients whose primary tumors do not express steroid hormone receptors, because it is likely that early initiation of treatment is exclusively relevant for such patients.     

Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers

BACKGROUND: Germline BRCA1 mutations confer a substantial lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer, but whether cancer at other sites is increased is less clear. To evaluate the risks of other cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers, we conducted a cohort study of 11 847 individuals from 699 families segregating a BRCA1 mutation that were ascertained in 30 centers across Europe and North America. METHODS: The observed cancer incidence was compared with the expected cancer incidence based on population cancer rates. Relative risks (RRs) of each cancer type in BRCA1 carriers relative to risks for the general population were estimated by weighting individuals according to their estimated probability of being a mutation carrier. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: BRCA1 mutation carriers were at a statistically significantly increased risk for several cancers, including pancreatic cancer (RR = 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26 to 4.06, P =.004) and cancer of the uterine body and cervix (uterine body RR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.69 to 4.16, P<.001; cervix RR = 3.72, 95% CI = 2.26 to 6.10, P<.001). There was some evidence of an elevated risk of prostate cancer in mutation carriers younger than 65 years old (RR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.29, P =.05) but not in those 65 years old or older (RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.53 to 1.33, P =.45). Overall, increases in the risk for cancer at sites other than the breast or ovary were small and evident in women (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.93 to 2.75, P =.001) but not in men (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.12, P =.58). CONCLUSIONS: In carriers of BRCA1 mutations, the overall increased risk of cancer at sites other than breast and ovary is small and is observed in women but generally not in men. BRCA1 mutations may confer increased risks of other abdominal cancers in women and increased risks of pancreatic cancer in men and women.     

High p27Kip1 expression predicts superior relapse-free and overall survival for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen plus goserelin.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of p27Kip1 in premenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined tumor specimens from 512 patients with breast cancer who were enrolled onto Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 5. In this trial, premenopausal, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with stage I and II disease were randomly assigned to receive either 5 years of tamoxifen plus 3 years of goserelin or six cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. p27Kip1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and its association with clinical outcome was determined. Statistical analyses were performed to test for interaction between p27Kip1 status and treatment. RESULTS: High p27Kip1 expression (nuclear p27Kip1 staining in >/= 50% of tumor cells) independently predicted superior relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in both the total study population (RFS: relative risk [RR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.82; P =.004; OS: RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.58; P <.001) and patients treated with combination endocrine therapy (RFS: RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.63; P =.001; OS: RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.53; P =.003). The interaction between p27Kip1 expression and treatment was statistically significant for RFS (P =.04) but not for OS (P =.27). CONCLUSION: High p27Kip1 expression was an independent predictor of responsiveness to hormonal therapy and thus may be useful for the selection of premenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer for adjuvant combination endocrine therapy.     

Association between plasma prolactin concentrations and risk of breast cancer among predominately premenopausal women

Recent evidence suggests that prolactin may be positively associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk; however, little data are available in younger women. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, nested case-control study to examine the relationship between plasma prolactin concentrations and breast cancer risk in predominately premenopausal women from the Nurses' Health Study II. Blood samples were collected from 1996 to 1999. The analysis includes 316 cases of breast cancer diagnosed after blood donation and before June 1, 2003, who had two controls matched on age, fasting status, time of day and month of blood collection, race/ethnicity, and timing of blood draw within the menstrual cycle. Sixty-three percent of participants provided a timed follicular and luteal menstrual phase blood sample; other women provided a single untimed sample. When including all women, we observed a positive association between prolactin and breast cancer risk [relative risk (RR), top quartile versus bottom quartile, 1.5; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.0-2.3; P(trend) = 0.03] that was slightly stronger among estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive tumors (comparable RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.3; P(trend) = 0.04). Associations were similar among premenopausal women only. However, we did not find an association between prolactin and breast cancer risk among the subset of women who only provided timed samples (comparable RR, average of timed samples, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.3; P(trend) = 0.40). The association seemed stronger among women > or = 45 years old and for cases diagnosed within approximately 4 years of blood collection. Our data suggest a modest positive association between prolactin and breast cancer risk among predominately premenopausal women; however, further follow-up is needed to increase power for subgroup analyses.     

Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic importance of immunocytochemically determined c-erbB-2 overexpression in the primary tumors of patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary tumors from 1,506 breast cancer patients (760 node-negative and 746 node-positive) who were treated in the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V were studied. Node-negative patients were allocated randomly to either a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) or no adjuvant treatment, and node-positive patients received either a prolonged chemotherapy (with tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients) or a single perioperative cycle. RESULTS: Tumors from 16% of the node-negative patients and 19% of the node-positive patients were found to be c-erbB-2-positive. In both groups c-erbB-2 positivity correlated with negative progesterone receptors (PR), negative estrogen receptors (ER), and high tumor grade. Lobular carcinomas were all negative, and, thus support the view that such tumors represent a defined subtype of breast carcinoma. The expression of c-erbB-2 was prognostically significant for node-positive but not for node-negative patients. However, in both subgroups, the prognostic significance was greater for patients who had received more adjuvant therapy. For node-positive patients, the effect of prolonged-duration therapy on disease-free survival (DFS) was greater for patients without c-erbB-2 overexpression (hazards ratio [HR], = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.72) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.16). Similarly, for node-negative patients, the effect of PeCT on DFS was greater for those without c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.09) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66 to 2.25). CONCLUSION: We conclude that tumors with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 oncogene are less responsive to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-containing adjuvant therapy regimens than those with a normal amount of gene product.     

Family history of breast cancer and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy

The impact of a family history of breast cancer on the local recurrence (LR) risk after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) was performed within the framework of a large, multicentre matched case–control study of risk factors for LR after BCT (BORST study). Family history was assessed for 218 breast cancer patients with LR (cases) and 480 patients without LR (controls). Detailed histological tumour features were determined by review of the primary tumour. The risk of LR for patients with a positive family history was similar to or less than that of non-familial patients (unadjusted odds ratio (OR_unadj) 0.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.08)). Familial patients were older than non-familial patients (P=0.07) and their tumours had a lower histological grade (P=0.07). A second primary tumour occurred significantly more often in familial patients (P=0.02). Adjustment for these factors did not essentially alter the results (OR_adj 0.71 (0.38–1.32)). Separate analyses according to age at onset (younger and older than 50 years) and time to LR/site of LR produced similar results. The sole presence of a positive family history of breast cancer does not appear to be a risk factor for local recurrence after BCT. Whilst this might be different for genetically predisposed patients, a positive family history does not appear to be a contra-indication for BCT.     

Reproductive factors and risk of premenopausal breast cancer by age at diagnosis: Are there differences before and after age 40?

We examined the relationship between reproductive factors and risk of premenopausal breast cancer among women less than age 40 compared with older premenopausal women. We documented 374 incident cases of breast cancer diagnosed before age 40, and 2,533 cases diagnosed at age 40 and older among premenopausal women in the Nurses’ Health Study cohorts. Biennial questionnaires were used to determine age at menarche, age at first birth, parity, breastfeeding, and other reproductive factors. Multivariate relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models within age at diagnosis groups. Tumors in younger women were significantly more likely to be higher grade, larger size, and hormone receptor negative than were tumors in older premenopausal women (p < 0.0001). There was no significant heterogeneity according to age in associations between reproductive factors and risk of premenopausal breast cancer. First birth at age 30 or older increased breast cancer risk in both age groups (age <40: RR 1.10, 95 % CI 0.80–1.50; age ≥40: RR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.02–1.32; p-heterogeneity = 0.44). Risk of premenopausal breast cancer decreased with each additional year of age at menarche in both age groups (age <40: RR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.87–0.99; p trend = 0.02; age ≥40: RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.91–0.97; p trend = <0.0001). Among premenopausal parous women, breastfeeding was protective regardless of age at diagnosis (age <40: RR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.57–1.22; age ≥40: RR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.72–0.99; p-heterogeneity = 0.79). In the largest prospective examination of reproductive risk factors and risk of breast cancer before and after age 40, we found that younger women were more likely to develop tumors with less favorable prognostic characteristics. However, associations between reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer were similar regardless of age at diagnosis of premenopausal breast cancer.     

Impact of primary local treatment on the development of distant metastases or death through locoregional recurrence in young breast cancer patients

In this study, we tested the hypothesis whether breast conserving therapy (BCT) compared with mastectomy is associated with a negative outcome in terms of distant metastases or death (DMD) and investigated the relation between locoregional recurrence (LRR) and DMD in young breast cancer (BC) patients. This study included a consecutive series of 536 patients ≤40 years of age at diagnosis with pathological T1N0-3M0 BC, treated between 1989 and 2005. A multistate survival model was used to evaluate the influences of local treatment and LRR on DMD, adjusted for potential prognostic factors. Patients were treated with mastectomy (N = 213) or BCT (N = 323). Median age at diagnosis was 36.3 years, with a median follow-up of 9.0 years. The 10-year actuarial cumulative incidence of DMD was 30.6 % after mastectomy and 26.3 % after BCT (P = 0.04). In total, 81 (15 %) LRRs were observed. After BCT, patients had a threefold higher risk of LRR than after mastectomy (HR 2.9; 95 % CI 1.6–5.3). Patients with LRR had a higher risk of DMD compared with patients without LRR (HR 5.5; 95 % CI 2.1–14.5). However, BCT was not negatively associated with DMD-after-LRR (HR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.2–1.1, BCT vs mastectomy). In conclusion, although LRR significantly affected DMD, the increased risk of LRR after BCT compared with mastectomy did not lead to a worse DMD outcome in BC patients ≤40 years of age.     

Red meat consumption during adolescence among premenopausal women and risk of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Adolescence may be a period of increased susceptibility to breast cancer due to regular division of undifferentiated cells that occurs between puberty and first birth. Red meat consumption during early adult life has been associated with breast cancer, but intake during adolescence has not been examined prospectively. We aimed to assess the relationship between red meat intake during adolescence and premenopausal breast cancer. METHODS: We examined the incidence of invasive premenopausal breast cancer prospectively within the Nurses' Health Study II. A total of 39,268 premenopausal women who completed a validated 124-item food frequency questionnaire on their diet during high school, were followed for 7 years, from 1998 to 2005. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: 455 cases of invasive premenopausal breast cancer were diagnosed between 1998 and 2005. Compared with women in the lowest quintile of red meat intake during high school, the multivariate-adjusted RR for the highest quintile of intake was 1.34 (95% CI, 0.94-1.89; P(trend) = 0.05). A significant linear association was observed with every additional 100 g of red meat consumed per day (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00-1.43; P = 0.05). This association was more pronounced in hormone receptor-positive tumors (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08-1.70; P = 0.008) and was not significant in hormone receptor-negative tumors (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.61-1.61, P = 0.97). CONCLUSION: Higher red meat intake in adolescence may increase the risk of premenopausal breast cancer.     

Plasma folate,vitamin B6, vitamin B12, homocysteine,and risk of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: In several epidemiologic investigations, folate intake has appeared to reduce the elevated risk of breast cancer associated with moderate alcohol consumption. However, data relating plasma folate levels to breast cancer risk are sparse. We investigated the association between plasma folate and other vitamins with breast cancer in a prospective, nested case-control study. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained during 1989 and 1990 from 32 826 women in the Nurses' Health Study who were followed through 1996 for the development of breast cancer. We identified 712 breast cancer case patients and selected 712 individually matched control subjects. Dietary information was obtained using food frequency questionnaires given in 1980, 1984, 1986, and 1990. Logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risks (RRs) of breast cancer (after adjustment for potential risk factors), and a generalized linear model was used to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficients between plasma estimates of folate, vitamin B(6), vitamin B(12), and homocysteine, and intakes of folate, vitamin B(6), and vitamin B(12). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The multivariable RR comparing women in the highest quintile of plasma folate with those in the lowest was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 1.07; P(trend) =.06). The inverse association between plasma folate and breast cancer risk was highly statistically significant among women consuming at least 15 g/day (i.e., approximately 1 drink/day) of alcohol (multivariable RR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.59 for highest versus lowest quintile) in contrast with that of women consuming less than 15 g/day (multivariable RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.05). The multivariable RR comparing women in the highest quintile of plasma vitamin B(6) levels with those in the lowest quintile was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.48 to 1.02; P(trend) =.09). Plasma vitamin B(12) levels were inversely associated with breast cancer risk among premenopausal women (multivariable RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.86 for highest versus lowest quintile) but not among postmenopausal women. Plasma homocysteine was not associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Higher plasma levels of folate and possibly vitamin B(6) may reduce the risk of developing breast cancer. Achieving adequate circulating levels of folate may be particularly important for women at higher risk of developing breast cancer because of higher alcohol consumption.     

The association of plasma DHEA and DHEA sulfate with breast cancer risk in predominantly premenopausal women.

Concentrations of adrenal androgens are positively associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk; however, results in premenopausal women are conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a prospective nested case-control study within the Nurses' Health Study II cohort to examine the relationship of DHEA and DHEA sulfate (DHEAS) with breast cancer risk in predominantly premenopausal women. Blood samples were collected from 1996 to 1999. The analysis included 317 cases of breast cancer diagnosed after blood collection and before June 1, 2003; for each case, two controls were matched on age, fasting status, time of day and month of blood collection, race/ethnicity, and timing of blood draw within the menstrual cycle. No associations were observed between DHEA or DHEAS levels and breast cancer risk overall [in situ and invasive; DHEA relative risk (RR), top versus bottom quartile, 1.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.8-1.8, P(trend) = 0.53; DHEAS RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0; P(trend) = 0.07]. However, both DHEA and DHEAS were positively associated with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (DHEA RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9-2.8, P(trend) = 0.09; DHEAS RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.3, P(trend) = 0.02). We observed a significant interaction by age, with an RR for DHEAS of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4-1.5, P(trend) = 0.62) for women <45 years old and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2-3.5, P(trend) = 0.003) for women >/=45 years old; results were similar for DHEA. Our results suggest that adrenal androgens are positively associated with breast cancer among predominately premenopausal women, especially for estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive tumors and among women over age 45 years.     

Invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 and HER2 status provide independent and complementary information on patient outcome in node-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The independent clinical relevance of invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)/PAI-1 and HER2 status was evaluated in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients (N = 118) without adjuvant systemic therapy after long-term follow-up of more than 10 years (median, 126 months). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Levels of uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1 were prospectively measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in primary tumor tissue extracts. HER2 gene amplification (HER2_AMP) was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; Ventana Medical Systems HER-2/neu probe; Tucson, AZ), and HER2 protein overexpression (HER2_EXP) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC; Oncogene Science antibody Ab-3; Cambridge, MA) on parallel-cut formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. RESULTS: uPA/PAI-1 was high (either one or both factors were high) in 44% of the tumors. HER2_AMP was detected by FISH in 33% of the patients, and HER2_EXP was found by IHC in 44% of the patients. In a multivariate analysis of established and tumor-biologic prognostic factors, uPA/PAI-1 was the only independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival ([DFS]; P <.001; relative risk [RR], 8.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4 to 20.4). Although HER2_AMP and HER2_EXP did not reach significance for DFS, they were significant for overall survival (OS), even in multivariate analysis (HER2_AMP: P =.004; RR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 9.2; HER2_EXP: P =.009; RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 8.7). CONCLUSION: After long-term follow-up, uPA/PAI-1 levels in primary tumor tissue reliably and strongly indicate an aggressive course of disease in lymph node-negative breast cancer independent of HER2 status. The particular prognostic effect of HER2 status on OS may reflect its ability to predict resistance to systemic therapy.     

Circulating insulin and c-peptide levels and risk of breast cancer among predominately premenopausal women.

Insulin and insulin resistance have been hypothesized to increase the risk of breast cancer as insulin increases breast cell proliferation and inhibits sex hormone binding globulin. Although insulin is directly related to body weight, adiposity is inversely associated with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women but directly related to risk in postmenopausal women. To explore the association between insulin and c-peptide levels and breast cancer risk, we conducted a nested case-control study of predominantly premenopausal women within the Nurses' Health Study II cohort. From 1996 to 1999, blood samples were collected from 29,611 participants. A total of 317 cases were diagnosed after blood collection and before June 2003 and matched to 634 controls; 75% of these women were premenopausal at blood collection. Logistic regression models, controlling for breast cancer risk factors, were used to calculate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Among women with fasting blood samples (n = 211 cases), insulin was suggestively inversely associated with breast cancer risk (highest versus lowest quartile: RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-1.0; P(trend) = 0.06). Among all women, c-peptide was not associated with breast cancer risk (highest versus lowest quartile: RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.7; P(trend) = 0.79); results were similar among fasting samples. These associations did not differ by age, body mass index, or waist-to-hip ratio. Overall, higher levels of insulin and c-peptide were not associated with a higher risk of breast cancer among predominantly premenopausal women.     

Locoregional recurrence rates and prognostic factors for failure in node-negative patients treated with mastectomy: implications for postmastectomy radiation

PURPOSE: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) of breast cancer. Survival appears improved in patients at higher risk for LRR. This study addresses whether subsets of node-negative patients with sufficiently high risk of LRR might benefit from PMRT. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 877 cases of node-negative breast cancer treated with mastectomy, without adjuvant radiation, from 1980 to 2000. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 100 months. Ten-year cumulative incidence of LRR as first event was 6.0%. Size greater than 2 cm, margin less than 2 mm, premenopausal status, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were independently significant prognostic factors. Ten-year LRR was 1.2% for those with 0 risk factors, 10.0% for those with 1 risk factor, 17.9% for those with 2 risk factors, and 40.6% for those with 3 risk factors. The chest wall was the site of failure in 80% of patients. CONCLUSION: Postmastectomy radiation therapy has not been recommended for node-negative patients because the LRR rate is low in that population overall. This study suggests, however, that node-negative patients with multiple risk factors, including close margins, T2 or larger tumors, premenopausal status, and LVI, are at higher risk for LRR and might benefit from PMRT. Because the chest wall is the most common site of failure, treating the chest wall alone in these patients to minimize toxicity is reasonable.     

Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: High Incidence in Young Patients and Association with Poor Survival

Purpose: To study risk factors for local recurrence (LR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for invasive breast cancer and, for patients with an LR, the mode of detection, location, treatment, influence of radiation therapy, and impact on survival.Methods and Materials: 1360 patients (median age 52 years; range 24–88) with a total of 1393 pT1-2 N0-1 tumors treated with BCT between 1980–1994 were studied (median follow-up 52 months). The adequacy of radiation treatment of the patients developing LR was studied in a quality control study. The impact of LR on overall survival and distant metastasis was studied in a Cox regression model with LR as a time-dependent covariate.Results: A total of 88 LR occurred with a 5- and 10-year LR risk of 8 and 12%. Age was the only significant risk factor. Compared to patients >65 years old, patients <45 years old and patients 45–65 years old had a relative risk (RR) of 4.09 and 2.41, respectively, of developing LR. Risk on LR was found to increase gradually with younger age. Radiation therapy was considered adequate and did not play a role in influencing the LR rate. Almost 65% of the LR were true or marginal recurrences. Of all LR, 80% appeared during the first 5 years and were detected with equal frequency by the patient herself, the physician, and annual mammography. LR was a major predictor for distant metastasis (RR: 4.90; 3.15–7.62) and death (RR: 4.29; 2.93–6.28).Conclusion: Young age is a major risk factor for LR and there is a significant gradual increase in LR with decreasing age. LR is associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis and death. Whether LR is the cause of or a marker for distant metastasis remains unresolved.     

Prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrences (LR) after (modified) radical mastectomy (MRM) or breast conserving therapy (BCT), in terms of overall survival and time to subsequent LR, in patients originally treated in two European randomised trials. In EORTC trial 10801 and DBCG trial 82-TM, 1,807 patients with stage I and II breast cancer were randomised to receive MRM or BCT from 1980 to 1989. All patients with a LR in these trials were analysed for survival and time to subsequent LR after salvage treatment. Of these, 133 patients had their LR as a first event, the majority within 5 years after initial treatment. The prognostic significance for survival and time to subsequent LR after salvage treatment was analysed in uni-, and multivariate analyses for a number of original tumour- and recurrence-related variables. After salvage treatment of LR after MRM or BCT, actuarial survival curves and the actuarial locoregional control curves were similar. The 5-year survival rates were 58% and 59% and the 5-year subsequent loco-regional control rates 62% and 63%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, pN category (P = 0.03), pT category (P = 0.01) and vascular invasion (P = 0.02) of the primary tumour were the only independent prognostic factors for survival, whereas extensive LR (P < 0.001), interval < or = 2 years (P < 0.002) and pN+ at primary treatment (P = 0.004) were significant predictive factors for time to subsequent LR. The type of original treatment (MRM or BCT) did not have any prognostic impact. It is concluded that the survival and time to subsequent LR after treatment for an early loco-regional recurrence after MRM or BCT was similar in these two European randomised trials. This suggests that both after MRM and BCT an early LR is an indicator of a biologically aggressive tumour; early loco-regional relapse carries a poor prognosis and salvage treatment only cures a limited number of patients, whether treated by MRM or BCT originally.     

Prognosis of premenopausal breast cancer and childbirth prior to diagnosis.

PURPOSE: The time interval between last childbirth and subsequent breast cancer diagnosis is emerging as an important prognostic factor for premenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied, prospectively, 750 women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer before age 45 years who participated in the population-based Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 4.9 years (range, 0.8 to 10.8 years). Compared with nulliparous women, women who gave birth within 2 years prior to diagnosis were more likely to have axillary node-positive (58% v 41%; P =.01), and estrogen receptor-negative (58% v 39%; P =.005) tumors. The unadjusted hazard ratios for death were 2.3 (95% CI, 1.3 to 3.8; P =.002), 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6; P =.03), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.5; P =.8) for patients who gave birth less than 2 years, 2 to 5 years, and 5 or more years before diagnosis, respectively. After adjusting for tumor characteristics, these hazard ratios were reduced to 1.9 (95%CI, 1.1 to 3.2; P =.02), 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.1; P =.3), and 0.9 (95%CI, 0.5 to 1.4; P =.5). Modeling showed that, compared with nulliparous women, the mortality hazard ratio in parous women was 1.9, decreasing by 8% (95%CI, 4% to 13%; P <.001) for each year between last birth and breast cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Proximity of last childbirth to subsequent breast cancer diagnosis is a predictor of mortality independent of histopathological tumor characteristics. Clinicians should be aware that women diagnosed with breast cancer within a few years following childbirth may have a worse outcome than that suggested solely by the standard histopathological prognostic factors of their cancer.     

Histological determinants for different types of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy of invasive breast cancer. Dutch Study Group on local Recurrence after Breast Conservation (BORST)

The purpose of this study was to determine which histological factors are associated with an increased risk for local recurrence in the breast after breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer (TNM stage I and II) and whether risk patterns vary according to menopausal status and type of local recurrence. Through complete follow-up of the patients of eight regional radiation oncology departments, two cancer institutes and one surgical clinic in The Netherlands, 360 patients were identified with local recurrence in the breast after having received breast-conserving therapy (local tumour excision, axillary dissection and irradiation of the whole breast and a boost to the tumour bed) during the 1980s. For each case, two controls with a follow-up of similar duration without local recurrence were randomly selected. Histological slides of the primary tumour were reviewed. Among premenopausal patients the risk of recurrence for those younger than 35 years was significantly higher than that for premenopausal patients of 45 years or older (relative risk (RR) 2.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3-6.6, P < 0.05). The risk of recurrence at or near the site of the primary tumour was most significantly increased for patients with high grade extensive intraductal component (EIC) adjacent to the primary tumour (RR 4.1; 95% CI 1.7-9.8, P < 0.01). Microscopic margin involvement was an important risk indicator for diffuse recurrence and recurrence in the skin of the breast, especially in the presence of vascular invasion (RR 25; 95% CI 4.0-150, P < 0.001). To prevent local recurrence at or near the site of the primary tumour, local excision with a 1-2 cm margin of healthy tissue and a 15 Gy boost seemed adequate local treatment for patients with well differentiated EIC. In contrast, a wider surgical margin, a higher boost dose or mastectomy should be considered for patients with poorly differentiated EIC. Microscopic margin involvement in the presence of vascular invasion significantly increases the risk of diffuse recurrence or recurrence in the skin.     

Urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites and subsequent risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women

Endogenous estrogens and estrogen metabolism are hypothesized to be associated with premenopausal breast cancer risk but evidence is limited. We examined 15 urinary estrogens/estrogen metabolites and breast cancer risk among premenopausal women in a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII). From 1996 to 1999, urine was collected from 18,521 women during the mid-luteal menstrual phase. Breast cancer cases (N = 247) diagnosed between collection and June 2005 were matched to two controls each (N = 485). Urinary estrogen metabolites were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and adjusted for creatinine level. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by multivariate conditional logistic regression. Higher urinary estrone and estradiol levels were strongly significantly associated with lower risk (top vs. bottom quartile RR: estrone = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.88; estradiol = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.86). Generally inverse, although nonsignificant, patterns also were observed with 2- and 4-hydroxylation pathway estrogen metabolites. Inverse associations generally were not observed with 16-pathway estrogen metabolites and a significant positive association was observed with 17-epiestriol (top vs. bottom quartile RR = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.08-2.81; P(trend) = 0.01). In addition, there was a significant increased risk with higher 16-pathway/parent estrogen metabolite ratio (comparable RR = 1.61; 95% CI, 0.99-2.62; P(trend) = 0.04). Other pathway ratios were not significantly associated with risk except parent estrogen metabolites/non-parent estrogen metabolites (comparable RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.96; P(trend) = 0.03). These data suggest that most mid-luteal urinary estrogen metabolite concentrations are not positively associated with breast cancer risk among premenopausal women. The inverse associations with parent estrogen metabolites and the parent estrogen metabolite/non-parent estrogen metabolite ratio suggest that women with higher urinary excretion of parent estrogens are at lower risk.