Histamine release following intrathecal administration of morphine for cesarean section

We present a case of unusually profound, prolonged hypotension after induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. The patient, a healthy parturient at 26 weeks gestation, received 0.75% bupivacaine, 15 mg and morphine, 0.15 mg by subarachnoid injection. Systolic blood pressure rapidly fell to below 80 mmHg despite left uterine displacement, 10 l of balanced saline solution, ephedrine 210 mg and phenylephrine 1000 microg. At the end of the operation we noted a pruritic, erythematous, circumscribed, raised rash, consistent with urticaria, over the patient's trunk, legs, arms and face. This rash persisted for 2 days. We postulate that the excessive hypotension following spinal anesthesia in this parturient was the result of intrathecal morphine induced histamine release.     

A randomised,controlled trial of rectus sheath bupivacaine and intrathecal bupivacaine,without or with intrathecal morphine,vs. intrathecal bupivacaine and morphine after caesarean section

We recruited 144 women of whom 131 underwent scheduled caesarean section and were allocated to intrathecal bupivacaine without (46) or with (47) morphine and postoperative rectus sheath bupivacaine; or intrathecal bupivacaine with morphine and postoperative rectus sheath saline (38). We measured postoperative pain with a 10‐point numeric rating scale. The mean (SD) areas under the curve for pain on movement during 48 postoperative hours were 273.5 (63.6), 223.8 (80.7) and 223.8 (80.7), respectively, p = 0.008. There was no difference between women who had intrathecal morphine with or without rectus sheath bupivacaine, p = 1. The equivalent values for pain at rest were 160.8 (64.7), 85.8 (79.4) and 82.8 (74.3), respectively, p < 0.001. There was no difference between women who had intrathecal morphine with or without rectus sheath bupivacaine, p = 0.98.     

A comparison between post-operative analgesia after intrathecal nalbuphine with bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine after cesarean section

BackgroundAdding intrathecal opioids to intrathecal local anesthetics to decrease their doses and provide hemodynamic stability are major goals during spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Different opioids were used to select the one with the longest duration of analgesia and the least side effects. In this study, intrathecal nalbuphine was compared with intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in cesarean section.Patients and methodsSixty female patients of ASA grades I and II presented for elective cesarean deliveries with spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to 2 equal groups; Group F: 30 patients received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg); Group N: 30 patients received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg). The onset of sensory and complete motor blockade, time of sensory blockade, duration of analgesia and motor blockade, fetal Apgar score, visual analog scale score, oxygen saturation, adverse effects and hemodynamic parameters were recorded intra-operatively and up to 4 h post-operatively. The effective analgesic time was recorded.ResultsThe onset of complete motor block was significantly more rapid in fentanyl group than in nalbuphine group. The duration of post-operative analgesia was more prolonged in nalbuphine group but the difference was insignificant. No significant difference was found between both groups as regards the duration of sensory block, motor block, duration of analgesia, fetal Apgar score, visual analog scale score, hemodynamic parameters and oxygen saturation. Adverse effects were less common in nalbuphine group but the difference was insignificant.ConclusionEither intrathecal nalbuphine 0.8 mg or intrathecal fentanyl 25 μg combined with 10 mg bupivacaine provides good intra-operative and early post-operative analgesia in cesarean section.     

Intrathecal morphine in anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-response relationship for combinations of low-dose intrathecal morphine and spinal bupivacaine

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of analgesia and the severity of side effects of intrathecal morphine administered for a dose range of 0.0 to 0.4 mg for postcesarean analgesia with low-dose bupivacaine. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 100 ASA physical status I and II term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia in the operating room. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to one of 5 groups to receive 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mg intrathecal morphine in addition to low-dose (7.5 mg) heavy bupivacaine. Each patient received intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine after the operation. MEASUREMENTS: 24-hour IV PCA morphine use and visual analog scores for pain were recorded. The severity score (4-point scale) of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were assessed intraoperatively and at 4-hour intervals during the first 24 hours postoperatively. MAIN RESULTS: PCA morphine use was higher in the control group (0.0 mg) than in groups receiving 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mg intrathecal morphine. There was no difference in IV PCA morphine use between the 0.1 and 0.4-mg groups, despite a 4-fold increase in intrathecal morphine dose. There was no difference between groups in nausea and vomiting, but pruritus increased in direct proportion to the dose of intrathecal morphine (linear regression, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The dose of 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine produces analgesia comparable with doses as high as 0.4 mg, with significantly less pruritus when combined with low-dose bupivacaine.     

Delayed postoperative gastric emptying following intrathecal morphine and intrathecal bupivacaine

PURPOSE: A decrease in the rate of gastric emptying can delay resumption of enteral feeding, alter bioavailability of orally administered drugs, and result in larger residual gastric volumes, increasing the risk of nausea and vomiting. We compared the effects of 1) intrathecal bupivacaine (17.5 mg) and 2) the combination of intrathecal morphine (0.6 mg) and intrathecal bupivacaine (17.5 mg) on the rate of gastric emptying in patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty four fasting ASA 1-3 patients were randomly assigned, in a double blind manner, to receive intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (17.5 mg), either alone (group 1), or followed by intrathecal morphine (0.6 mg) (group 2). Gastric emptying was measured (using an acetaminophen absorption technique), twice in each patient; preoperatively, and approximately one hour postoperatively. Gastric emptying parameters are: AUC (area under the plasma acetaminophen concentration time curve), maximum plasma acetaminophen concentration (Cmax), and time to Cmax (tCmax), analyzed using paired Student's t tests. RESULTS: Gastric emptying rates were reduced in both group 1 (AUC = 14.98 (3.8) and 11.05 (4.6) pre- and postoperatively, respectively) and group 2 (AUC = 13.93 (3.59) and 6.4 (3.42) pre- and postoperatively, respectively); the magnitude of the reduction was greater in group 2 [AUC (P = 0.04), Cmax (P = 0.05), tCmax (P = 0.13)]. CONCLUSION: The combination of intrathecal morphine (0.6 mg) and intrathecal bupivacaine (17.5 mg) delays gastric emptying postoperatively.     

Influence of bupivacaine as an adjuvant to epidural morphine for analgesia after cesarean section

The effect of the addition of bupivacaine to epidural morphine (EM) on postoperative analgesia was evaluated in 150 patients after cesarean section performed under epidural anesthesia with carbonated lidocaine. Fifty patients received 3 mg EM without bupivacaine, 50 received 3 mg EM with 0.125% bupivacaine, 25 received 5 mg EM without bupivacaine, and 25 patients received 5 mg EM with 0.125% bupivacaine. Patients were assessed for quality and duration of postoperative analgesia, as well as the incidence and severity of side effects. The addition of bupivacaine did not affect the quality or duration of analgesia afforded by EM and did not influence the incidence or severity of side effects. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the analgesia obtained by patients receiving 3- and 5-mg doses of EM with or without bupivacaine.     

Prophylactic oral naltrexone with intrathecal morphine for cesarean section: effects on adverse reactions and analgesia

The influence of two different doses of oral naltrexone on the adverse effects and the analgesia associated with intrathecal morphine was compared in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Thirty-five patients undergoing cesarean section were provided postoperative analgesia by 0.25 mg intrathecal morphine. Sixty minutes later they were given 6 mg naltrexone, 3 mg naltrexone, or placebo as an oral solution. Pain relief was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale. Requirements for additional analgesics and side effects were recorded. Duration of analgesia was shorter in the 3- and 6-mg naltrexone groups than in the placebo group, 10.0 +/- 2.6, 12.4 +/- 2.6, and 19.2 +/- 4.5 h (mean +/- SEM), respectively, but values did not reach statistical significance. The incidence of pruritus and vomiting was significantly less in the 6-mg naltrexone group than in the other two groups (P less than 0.05). Somnolence was significantly less in the 3- and 6-mg naltrexone groups than in the placebo group (P less than 0.05). Naltrexone (6 mg) is an effective oral prophylactic against the pruritus and vomiting associated with intrathecal morphine for analgesia after cesarean section, but it is associated with shorter duration of analgesia.     

Combined use of intrathecal morphine and diclofenac suppository for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section has been used in Europe and North America, but its use is not common in Japan. METHODS: We randomized 40 parturients to two groups, given either intrathecal saline (control group) or intrathecal morphine 0.05 mg (morphine group) for caesarean section. To both groups, we gave a diclofenac suppository 50 mg every 8 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The area under curve for the visual analogue scale for pain during 24 hours after operation was significantly lower (P < 0.01) in the morphine group than the control group. In addition, the parturients who required pentazocine as a rescue analgesia was significantly fewer in the morphine group (5 parturients) than the control group (11 parturients). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the Apgar score of infants, pH in umbilical cord arterial and venous blood and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The incidence of pruritus was significantly higher in the morphine group (11 parturients) than the control group (no parturient). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal morphine 0.05 mg and diclofenac suppository 50 mg given every 8 hours produced effective postoperative analgesia with minimum side effects after caesarean section.     

Hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section

The efficacy and safety of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (Sensorcaine, Astra) was evaluated in 22 patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The dose varied from 7.5 to 10 mg, (depending on the patient's height) which was significantly lower than previously reported. Patients were placed in head-down tilt immediately after subarachnoid injection. The mean spread of analgesia was to T3, which was reached in 10-15 min. Regression was complete in 258 +/- 16 min. Complete motor paralysis of lower extremities occurred in only two patients. Complete recovery of motor function in all patients was evident in less than 2.5 h. All infants were vigorous at birth and there were no serious maternal complications. The incidence of hypotension was 4.5%, the lowest reported as a consequence of spinal anesthesia in this group of patients. A technique involving the use of reduced doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in conjunction with head-down tilt appears to be useful for spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.     

A comparison of epidural magnesium and/or morphine with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section

BackgroundMagnesium can potentiate the antinociceptive effect of morphine. This prospective randomized double-blinded study was undertaken to establish the analgesic effect of adding magnesium to epidural morphine during cesarean section.MethodsTwo hundred patients undergoing cesarean section under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia were recruited. After administration of intrathecal bupivacaine 10 mg, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four epidural study solutions: 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL (Group B); 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL and morphine 1.5 mg (Group B+Mor); 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL and magnesium 500 mg (Group B+Mg); or 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL morphine 1.5 mg and magnesium 500 mg (Group B+Mor+Mg). The primary outcome was the area under the curve for visual analog scale pain scores during 36 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included time to the use of rescue analgesics, patient satisfaction and side effects.ResultsPatients in Group B+Mor+Mg had lower for pain scores and area under the curve pain scores both at rest and on movement, increased time for first analgesic request, and increased satisfaction score at 24 h after surgery.ConclusionAddition of magnesium 500 mg and morphine 1.5 mg to epidural 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL reduced postoperative pain compared with addition of morphine or magnesium alone or no additive.     

Spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine HCl for cesarean section

BACKGROUND: We performed this prospective study to determine the proper amount of hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride as a spinal anesthetic agent for cesarean section. METHODS: The parturients were randomly allocated to receive one of four spinal agents in a blind manner; tetracaine 10 mg (control), bupivacaine 10, 12.5 and 15 mg. Morphine HCl 0.1 mg was added to each agent and the total volume was adjusted to 3.1 ml with 10% glucose solution. RESULTS: All the four spinal agents provided an adequate analgesic level (T 5) without serious complications. Among the three dosages of bupivacaine, the time interval requiring for anesthetic level to reach T 5 tended to be shorter with a larger amount of bupivacaine. The incidence of intraoperative supplemental analgesic and hypotension and the dosage of ephedrine used to treat hypotension were greater in the patients anesthetized with tetracaine 10 mg than in those anesthetized with bupivacaine 10 mg, which is equipotent to tetracaine 10 mg. CONCLUSIONS: 1. As a spinal anesthetic agent for cesarean section, hyperbaric bupivacaine is superior to tetracaine. 2. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, 12.5 mg or 15 mg can be used safely and effectively as a spinal agent for cesarean section. 3. High dose bupivacaine is recommended in an urgent case, and low dose bupivacaine is recommended when maternal hypotension must be strictly avoided.     

Randomized trial of transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine after cesarean delivery with or without intrathecal morphine

Study objectiveTo investigate efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with or without intrathecal morphine (ITM) compared with ITM alone for postsurgical analgesia after cesarean delivery (CD).DesignMulticenter, open-label, randomized trial (NCT03853694).SettingOperating room.PatientsWomen with term pregnancy of 37 to 42 weeks scheduled for elective CD under spinal anesthesia.InterventionPatients were randomized 1:1:1 to LB 266 mg TAP block alone (LB group), ITM 50 μg followed by LB 266 mg TAP block (LB + ITM group), or ITM 150 μg alone (ITM group). All groups received the same postsurgical multimodal analgesic regimen.MeasurementsThe LB and LB + ITM groups were compared with the ITM group for all efficacy outcomes. Postsurgical opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) through 72 h was compared by assessing noninferiority before testing superiority. Postsurgical pruritus severity was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale.Main resultsBetween March 4, 2019, and January 10, 2020, 153 patients (LB, n = 52; LB + ITM, n = 48; ITM, n = 53) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. The LB group had statistically noninferior postsurgical opioid consumption through 72 h compared with the ITM group (least squares mean [LSM], 19.2 vs 16.4 MMEs; LSM treatment ratio, 1.17 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–1.86]; noninferiority P < 0.0034) as did the LB + ITM group (LSM, 14.6 vs 16.4 MMEs; LSM treatment ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.55–1.44]; noninferiority P < 0.0001). The LB and LB + ITM groups had significantly reduced pruritus severity scores through 12, 24, 48, and 72 h compared with the ITM group (P ≤ 0.0121). Adverse events occurred in 58%, 85%, and 81% of the LB, LB + ITM, and ITM groups, respectively.ConclusionsLB TAP block with or without ITM resulted in statistically noninferior postsurgical opioid consumption through 72 h, reduced pruritus, and favorable safety compared with ITM in women undergoing CD.     

Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a retrospective study with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine

BACKGROUND: We investigated retrospectively the relationship between the intrathecal dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and the use of 2% mepivacaine through an epidural catheter. METHODS: Forty-nine patients undergoing cesarean section with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were analyzed. They were divided into two groups; with (CSEA group) and without additional epidural injection group (spinal group). RESULTS: In the CSEA group (24 patients received 1.2 +/- 0.4 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine), 5-10 ml of 2% mepivacaine were required to achieve the adequate surgical anesthesia. In the spinal group (25 patients received 1.6 +/- 0.3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine), cesarean section was performed without additional mepivacaine before delivery. The analgesic level and the amount of fluid infusion were similar in the two groups. However, 20% of patients in the spinal group showed hypotension (systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg), although no patients in the CSEA group developed hypotension. The amount of ephedrine used before delivery was significantly larger in the spinal group (8.9 +/- 7.7 mg) than in the CSEA group (3.9 +/- 4.3 mg). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia induced by 1.2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with sequential epidural block induced by 5-10 ml of 2% mepivacaine caused no hypotension during cesarean section.     

Delayed respiratory depression associated with 0.15 mg intrathecal morphine for cesarean section: a review of 1915 cases

PURPOSE: A low dose of morphine, given intrathecally is an effective postoperative analgesic technique and is widely used in cesarean section. Delayed respiratory depression is the most feared side effect of this technique. However, this side effect has not been thoroughly reported in the obstetric population. The aim of this study was to describe respiratory depression associated with intrathecal morphine in postcesarean women, and to estimate its incidence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the obstetric anesthesia database at our institution from April 2000 to December 2006. Patients who were given 0.15 mg intrathecal morphine for cesarean section were identified. From this group, we identified patients who developed bradypnea (respiratory rate 相似文献   

0.75%重比重布比卡因剖宫产腰硬联合麻醉的应用

目的探讨重比重布比卡因腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产麻醉中的应用。方法选择120例剖宫产手术的产妇,ASAI-Ⅱ,行L2—3或L3—4间隙穿刺,穿刺成功后注入0.75%布比卡因重比重液1~2mL(7.5~15mg),控制麻醉平面后,测血压、脉搏、呼吸。结果麻醉起效时间为1~3min,注药后(6.3±2.2)min阻滞完善。腰骶部阻滞完善,对产妇血压的影响不超过其基础值的20%,脉搏、呼吸基本无明显影响,术后并发症少,新生儿Apgar评分(18.8±0.7)分。结论腰硬联合麻醉起效快、效果确切、肌松良好、对胎儿循环干扰小、并发症少。