A randomised, prospective study on the conversion from cyclosporine-prednisone to cyclosporine-azathioprine at 6 months after renal transplantation

Abstract In a randomised prospective trial, we studied the effects of replacement of prednisone (Pred) by azathioprine (Aza), 6 months after transplantation, in stable renal allograft recipients on cyclosporine and prednisone (CsA+Pred). Out of 83 patients, 42 started treatment with CsA+Aza and 41 continued therapy with CsA+Pred. CsA was dosed to achieve a level of 150 ng/ml, the Aza dose was 3 mg/kg per day and the Pred dose was 0.15 mg/ kg per day. Eighteen months after randomisation, in the CsA+Aza group 18 of the 42 patients were effectively treated with CsA+Aza. In the main, anaemia, leuco- and thrombocytopenia, and hypocorticism necessitated the reintroduction of Pred in the remaining 24 patients. Compared to the continuation of CsA+Pred, conversion of Pred to Aza resulted in a reduced number of antihypertensive drugs needed, and in lower serum total, LDL and HDL cholesterol levels; the incidence of acute rejections and graft losses was no different. In conclusion, conversion of CsA+Pred to CsA+Aza is a safe option in renal transplant patients with contraindications to long-term corticosteroid treatment.     

肾移植后免疫抑制用药方案与移植肾长期存活的关系

目的 分析肾移植后不同的免疫抑制用药方案对移植肾长期存活的影响。方法 根据不同用药组合将患者分为环孢素Ａ（ＣｓＡ）、硫唑嘌呤（Ａｚａ）和泼尼松（Ｐｒｅｄ）三联治疗组、ＣｓＡ和Ｐｒｅｄ二联治疗组、Ａｚａ和Ｐｒｅｄ传统二联治疗组。统计分析免疫抑制用药、排斥反应发生及人、肾存活情况;对发生排斥反应的患者追踪其发生排斥前１２个月内的药物更动情况。结果 采用三联治疗的患者人／肾５年存活率（８８％／７８％）显     

Amelioration of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in cyclosporine-treated patients by addition of azathioprine

Management of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients remains problematic. We therefore initiated a protocol of azathioprine addition (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day) to ongoing CsA/Pred therapy. Three groups were treated. Group A (n = 21) had chronic progressive renal dysfunction (serum creatinine greater than or equal to 2.5 mg/dl or more than 15% above baseline) four or more months after transplantation. Group B (n = 8) had frequent or severe rejection episodes occurring despite adequate CsA levels. Group C (n = 7) had constitutional side effects of CsA with or without renal dysfunction persisting despite drug taper or financial difficulty in affording CsA. Aza was initiated 17.8 +/- 2.8 months after transplantation in group A, the mean serum creatinine having risen from 2.55 +/- 27 mg/dl to 3.04 +/- .20 mg/dl (P = .07) over the six months preceding Aza initiation, despite stable and low therapeutic range HPLC whole-blood CsA levels (118 +/- 10 ng/ml vs. 133 +/- 11 ng/ml, P = NS). Renal function declined at a rate of -0.20 +/- .06 Cr1/year in the six-month period before addition of Aza, and then improved at a rate of 0.09 +/- .04 Cr-1/year after addition of Aza (P = .002). These changes in renal function occurred without a decrease in CsA levels (118 +/- 10 six months before Aza vs. 126 +/- 26 six months after Aza, P = NS). In group B Aza was initiated at 58 +/- 8 days after transplantation when mean sCr was 3.56 +/- .29 mg/dl and mean CsA level was 222 +/- 17 ng/ml. At least follow-up 12.7 +/- 2.0 months after addition of Aza, all group B grafts were functioning, mean sCr was 2.69 +/- .31 mg/dl (P = .09 compared with baseline), and mean CsA level was 128 +/- 34 ng/ml (P = .07 compared with baseline). Group C patients had addition of Aza at 43 +/- 19 months after transplantation when mean sCr was 2.97 +/- .60 and mean CsA level was 125 +/- 30 ng/ml; addition of Aza had no influence on the rate of decline in renal function in this group. Of these 36 patients, 6 received therapy for acute rejection over the entire follow-up period of 12.3 +/- 1.4 months after addition of Aza; 4 of these retain graft function. Infectious complications consisted of 2 urinary tract infections, 1 bacterial pneumonia, and one case of otitis media.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

肾移植患者术后早期应用霉酚酸酯的临床观察

目的 观察肾移植术后早期不同剂量霉酚酸酯（ＭＭＦ）与环孢素Ａ（ＣｓＡ）和泼尼松（Ｐｒｅｄ）联用预防急性排斥反应的效果及安全性。方法 将６４例肾移植患者分为３组,分别给予ＭＭＦ２．０ｇ／ｄ（Ａ组）、１．５ｇ／ｄ（Ｂ组）及Ａｚａ ５０～１００ｍｇ／ｄ（Ｃ组）,每组均联用ＣｓＡ及Ｐｒｅｄ（剂量相同）。观察肾移植术后６个月内急性排斥反应的发生率、移植肾功能及药物的副作用。结果 Ａ、Ｂ、Ｃ组急性排斥反应的发     

Long-term, low-dose cyclosporine treatment of renal allograft recipients. A randomized trial

Ninety-two adult renal allograft recipients, receiving baseline immunosuppression with CsA and prednisone, were assigned randomly to one of the following regimens. CsA was discontinued (D/C group) in 47 recipients who were then maintained on Aza and prednisone; or Aza was added to continued low-dose CsA and prednisone (triple drug [TD] group) in 45 patients. Entry into the study required an absence of rejection and a stable creatinine for at least four months prior to randomization. The mean month of randomization was 8.34 +/- 2.9 for the D/C group, and 7.2 +/- 3.2 for the TD group. Following randomization, a significantly greater rate of rejection (P less than .01) was observed in the D/C group (40%) than in the TD group (13%). With a mean follow-up of 30 months, 41/47 of D/C allografts (87.2%) and 39/45 TD allografts (86.6%) were functioning. Nevertheless, rejection had a persistent adverse effect on allograft function, in both the D/C and TD groups, up to 36 months following randomization. Parameters such as donor-type and rejection prior to randomization did not identify recipients at risk for rejection following randomization. Therefore, although the CsA withdrawal regimen might be ideal, the opportunity to select appropriate candidates remained elusive. In contrast, the safety of the TD regimen became apparent. Neither significant nephrotoxicity nor hypertension was observed, and the opportunity for less daily prednisone was evident. Despite its additional cost, the TD regimen utilizing indefinite low-dose CsA, is preferred.     

Evidence that addition of azathioprine improves renal function in cyclosporine-treated patients with allograft dysfunction

Several approaches have been attempted to manage renal allograft dysfunction in cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-Pred)-treated patients. Conversion to conventional therapy and perioperative triple drug have been associated with high rates of acute rejection episodes, infections, or neoplasms. We report our experience in delayed addition of azathioprine (1-2 mg/kg/day) to CsA/Pred protocol in three groups of patients. Group I (n = 9) had chronic renal function deterioration due to chronic rejection; group II (n = 10) had repeated or severe acute rejection episodes despite adequate CsA levels; and group III (n = 8) had CsA toxicity despite drug tapering. In group I, serum creatinine (SCr) had risen from 2.2 +/- 0.9 to 2.9 +/- 0.7 mg/dl over the 6 months prior to Aza addition (P less than 0.05), renal function declining at a rate of -0.14 +/- 0.12 Cr-1/year. In the 6-month post-Aza, renal function improved at a rate of 0.06 +/- 0.06 Cr-1/year and during the entire follow-up at a rate of 0.04 +/- 0.12 Cr-1/year (P less than 0.05) with stable CsA levels (288 +/- 167 vs. 251 +/- 172 ng/dl, NS). In group II response was worse, though the rate of declining renal function prior to Aza (-0.10 +/- 0.10 Cr-1/year) was almost stopped after Aza. In group III there was very good response to Aza addition, as 7 out of 8 patients improved graft function (baseline SCr 2.5 +/- 0.7 mg/dl vs. 1.9 +/- 0.6 mg/dl at last follow-up, P less than 0.05), with significantly decreased CsA levels (480 +/- 97 vs. 268 +/- 120, P less than 0.05). One patient from group II died from pneumonia, and 6 patients (1 from group I and 5 from group II) lost their grafts. Fifteen patients improved graft function, and 9 worsened after addition of Aza. The bad-responders had significantly higher SCr at baseline compared with the good-responders (3.8 +/- 1.8 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.6 mg/dl, P less than 0.01). Amelioration of chronic graft dysfunction can be achieved by delayed addition of Aza to CsA-Pred in patients with chronic rejection or CsA toxicity. This is accompanied by low rate of acute rejection, good patient and graft survival, and low rate of infections. A worse outcome can be seen in patients with high-baseline SCr levels, suggesting the need for addition of Aza in the initial chronic graft dysfunction.     

Prospective, Pilot, Open-Label, Short-Term Study of Conversion to Leflunomide Reverses Chronic Renal Allograft Dysfunction

Leflunomide (LEF) is a synthetic isoxazole derivative with anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties, which has been reported to prevent acute rejection and delay progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in animal models. We performed a pilot, crossover trial in 22 renal transplant recipients who were converted from azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to LEF in an effort to slow progression of renal dysfunction [deteriorating renal function (n = 5), cyclosporine (CyA) nephrotoxicity (n = 4) or biopsy-proven CAN (n = 13)]. Baseline maintenance immunosuppression consisted of CyA, AZA or MMF and prednisone. Six-month postconversion patient and graft survival was 100% and 91%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine 6months preconversion was 2.2 +/- 0.6mg/dL, at initiation was 3.0 +/- 1.1 mg/dL, and 6 months postconversion was 2.8 +/- 1.3 mg/dL. The rate of change in serum creatinine was 35 +/- 39%/6 months preconversion and -5 +/- 21%/6 months postconversion to LEF (p = 0.003). Two patients discontinued LEF for diarrhea and myalgia. No readmissions, increase in liver function tests, infections or acute rejection episodes occurred. Mean CyA levels did not change, 146 +/- 72 ng/ mL pre-LEF vs. 132 +/- 51 ng/mL post-LEF, p = NS. Conversion to LEF reversed progression of chronic renal allograft dysfunction with minimal toxicity.     

The Milan clinical trial with cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. A three-year follow-up

Between February and November 1983, 108 recipients of cadaveric renal transplants entered a randomized multicenter trial and were treated either with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (n = 55) or with conventional treatment based on azathioprine (Aza) and glucocorticoids (n = 53). The graft survival probability at 3 years was 76% for CsA patients and 48% for Aza patients (P less than 0.001). The cumulative number of acute rejections was significantly lower in the CsA group (32 vs. 104, P less than 0.001). Incidence of early posttransplant anuria was similar in both groups and did not affect renal function after three years. Nephrotoxicity in CsA patients, when present, was handled by reducing the dose of CsA, but in 12/55 patients a change to conventional therapy was thought to be necessary. However, in this group of 12, one patient lost the allograft because of irreversible rejection and one patient died 14 months later because of an infection. Mean creatinine clearance after three years was significantly lower in the CsA patients (54.7 +/- 2.6 ml/min) than in Aza patients, (67.2 +/- 4.9 ml/min, P less than 0.05). Considering only patients with grafts functioning after three years and still on the original randomized therapy, the mean creatinine clearance was similarly and significantly decreased from 1 to 3 years in both groups. There were no significant differences in occurrence of severe infections. Side effects such as hypertension, hypertrichosis, tremor and gum hyperplasia were more frequent in CsA patients.     

Cyclosporine Withdrawal Improves Renal Function in Heart Transplant Patients on Reduced-Dose Cyclosporine Therapy

Renal failure is a major cause of morbidity after heart transplantation. It is unclear whether calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) free immunosuppression provides more nephroprotection than low-dose CNI therapy. Thirty-nine patients with renal failure on low-dose cyclosporine A (CsA) were studied (62.9 +/- 8.7 years, five female, 8.2 +/- 4.3 years posttransplant, serum creatinine: 1.9 +/- 0.3 mg/dL, calculated GFR (cGFR): 48.2 +/- 18.3 mL/min, CsA C0 level: 64.0 +/- 19.9 ng/mL). All patients had been treated with low-dose CsA >6 months, renal function was stable or slowly decreasing (creatinine 1.7-3.5 mg/dL). Nineteen patients were randomized to discontinuation of CsA and overlapping rapamycin therapy initiation (RAPA), 20 patients continued low-dose CsA (control). Three patients (16%) discontinued rapamycin medication for side effects (diarrhea, skin rash), two patients developed pneumonia and pulmonary embolism, respectively, no rejection or other infectious complications were seen. After 6 months, renal function in the control group was unchanged. In the RAPA group, renal function markedly improved (creatinine: 2.08 +/- 0.15 to 1.67 +/- 0.13 mg/dL, cGFR: 48.5 +/- 21.4 to 61.7 +/- 21.4 mL/min (p < 0.001 within and between groups)). In carefully selected late survivors following heart transplantation who are at low risk of rejection, CNI-free rapamycin-based immunosuppression improves cGFR even in those already receiving low-dose CsA therapy. The results of this study warrant further confirmation in larger clinical trials that are powered to assess clinical outcomes.     

Recurrent or de novo IgA nephropathy with crescent formation after renal transplantation

IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerular disease in China, accounting for 38.8% of primary glomerular disease. It has been reported that 20.8% patients of IgA nephropathy had a different degree of crescent formation. From January 1995 to December 2004, 1000 patients had undergone cadaveric renal transplantation, and 1742 allograft renal biopsies were reviewed in the Department of Nephrology at Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University. Among them, 18 cases were found with crescent formation, in which 10 patients were diagnosed as recurrent or de novo IgA nephropathy because their immunofluorescence showed strong IgA deposition in mesangial area and capillary. The initial treatment protocol was CsA+Azp+Pred, except in two cases of CsA+MMF+Pred. There were 8 males and 2 females, with ages from 25 to 69 (mean of 37.1) years old. All of them showed progressive renal dysfunction with increasing level of serum creatinine ranged from 1.48 to 6.25 mg/dL. Seven cases presented edema with an increasing level of proteinuria (1.36 to 3.58 g/24hr), and nine cases presented with hematuria ranging from 50 to 1250 x 10(4)/mL (one showed gross hematuria). In pathological examinations, they showed mesangial proliferation and matrix expansion with 10% to 66.7% crescents (mean of 37.5%) in their allograft renal biopsy's samples. All patients changed their immunosuppressive regimens; however, nine of them eventually advanced to ESRD and returned to hemodialysis after 6 to 36 months. Two cases received second renal transplantation after six months to five years, and one kept stable renal function with 2.5 mg/dL of serum creatinine after three years of follow-up. IgA nephropathy with crescentic formation was not rare in renal allografts or native glomerulonephritis in Chinese patients. These patients showed rapidly progressive renal dysfunction, and most of them lost graft function and needed hemodialysis therapy.     

The recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine

To evaluate the rate of recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine, we reviewed the outcome of 25 renal Tx performed in 24 patients who had FSGS as their original renal disease. After Tx, 6 patients were treated with steroids and azathioprine (follow-up: 42 +/- 34 months) and 19 with CsA (follow-up: 30 +/- 31 months). Two of 6 Aza treated patients (33%) developed recurrence of FSGS and nephrotic syndrome (NS). Both patients lost their graft because of FSGS 24 and 25 months after Tx. Ten of 19 patients (55%) given CsA showed recurrence of FSGS; one of them had had recurrence in the first graft treated with Aza. One patient lost his graft a few weeks after Tx because of acute rejection and 3 lost their graft because of FSGS 4-28 months after NS developed. One patient with NS died from pneumonia 14 months after Tx when his plasma creatinine was 2.7 mg/dl. Three other patients now have NS and plasma creatinine between 1.9 and 2.4 mg/dl 15-37 months after Tx. The last two patients have NS and normal renal function 10 and 31 months after Tx. In both groups, most patients developed NS within the first week after Tx. The patients with recurrence, given Aza or CsA, tended to be younger at the onset of the disease and to have a shorter duration of the disease, when compared with those without recurrence, but the differences were not statistically significant. In our experience neither CsA nor Aza showed any effect on the outcome of FSGS recurring in the graft.     

Improved renal function in sirolimus-treated renal transplant patients after early cyclosporine elimination

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (Rapamune; SRL) in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients. This study evaluated whether renal function could be improved by elimination of CsA from an SRL-based regimen. METHODS: This phase 2, open-label, controlled, randomized study was conducted at 17 centers in the United States and Europe. Two hundred forty-six first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were enrolled, and 197 were randomized to full-dose CsA (microemulsion) plus fixed-dose SRL (2 mg/day; group A, n=97) or reduced-dose CsA plus concentration-controlled SRL (troughs 10-20 ng/mL; group B, n=100). Most patients with acute tubular necrosis-delayed graft function that resolved later than posttransplantation day 7 were not randomized but were assigned to a third group (nonrandomized, n=49) and received up to 5 mg per day of SRL as part of their individualized treatment regimen. All patients received standard doses of corticosteroids. At the end of posttransplantation month 2, eligible patients (those not treated for rejection within 3 weeks) in group B had CsA tapered and eliminated over the subsequent 4 to 6 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 months after transplantation, renal function was significantly better in the CsA-elimination arm. In patients who were on therapy and who had not experienced an acute rejection episode before month 6, serum creatinine level was significantly lower (1.38 mg/dL vs. 1.82 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell method) was significantly higher (73.5 mL/min vs. 57.1 mL/min, P < 0.001) in group B than in group A. In the intention-to-treat population, rates of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months were similar between groups A and B (18.6% vs. 22.0%, respectively; P = 0.598). In addition, graft survival (92.8% and 95.0%) and patient survival (96.9% and 96.0%) rates at 12 months were not significantly different between groups A and B, respectively. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between black and nonblack recipients within treatment groups in terms of rejection rates and graft survival at 12 months. Black recipients in group B had better serum creatinine levels at 12 months compared with black recipients in group A (1.55 mg/dL vs. 2.69 mg/dL, respectively, P = 0.011), as did nonblack recipients in group B compared with nonblack recipients in group A (1.53 mg/dL vs. 1.75 mg/dL, respectively, P = 0.055). Black patients in group A had higher mean serum creatinine levels (2.69 mg/dL) than nonblack patients in group A (1.75 mg/dL, P = 0.028). Hypertension, edema, hypomagnesemia, and dyspnea were reported significantly less frequently in patients randomly assigned to undergo CsA elimination compared with patients in group A (P < 0.05); group B patients had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) incidence of abnormal liver function tests, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Concentration-controlled SRL with early elimination of CsA is safe and results in improved renal function. Reduced exposure to CsA does not result in a clinically significant increase in the incidence of acute rejection episodes. This is true for both black and nonblack recipients. SRL may be used to reduce the exposure of renal allograft recipients to the nephrotoxic effects of CsA.     

肾移植后应用雷帕霉素口服液的两年临床观察

目的观察肾移植后应用雷帕霉素(Rap)进行免疫抑制治疗的有效性和安全性。方法将接受首次尸体肾移植的患者50例随机分为两组,研究组30例,术后采用Rap、环孢素A(CsA)和泼尼松(Pred)预防急性排斥反应;对照组20例,术后采用硫唑嘌呤、CsA及Pred预防急性排斥反应。两个组CsA和Pred的用法和用量相同。密切观察和详细记录手术后发生的不良事件,并定期对实验室各项指标进行分析。结果研究组如期完成观察的例数为26例,对照组为18例。在观察的104周内,两组的人、肾存活率为100%;研究组和对照组急性排斥反应的发生率分别为3.7%(1/27)和25.0%(5/20),经激素冲击治疗后逆转;研究组在维持血CsA浓度与对照组相当的情况下,其CsA的用量低于对照组;研究组血胆固醇总量和甘油三酯的水平明显高于对照组。结论Rap用于预防肾移植后急性排斥反应是安全有效的,其与CsA合用可减少CsA的用量,Rap的副作用主要是导致血脂升高。     

Results of the Minnesota randomized prospective trial of cyclosporine versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients

Between September 26, 1980 and June 8, 1984, 246 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone (n = 131) or azathioprine (Aza)-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (n = 115). On December 31, 1984, actuarial patient survival rates at three years were 89% in the CsA group and 90% in the Aza group, and the corresponding graft survival rates were 82% and 79% (statistically insignificant differences). The results were also compared separately in diabetic and nondiabetic patients and in recipients of related and cadaver donor grafts; only in the subgroup of diabetic recipients of cadaver kidneys were the differences in graft survival rates significantly different between CsA- and Aza-treated patients. The incidence of posttransplant acute tubular necrosis was similar in CsA- and Aza-treated patients (33% v 27%), but the duration was significantly longer in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (15.7 +/- 18.4 v 7.7 +/- 3.0 days). Rejection episodes and infections (particularly CMV) occurred significantly less frequently in CsA- than in Aza-treated patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in CsA- than in Aza-treated recipients (2.0 +/- 0.6 v 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl). Treatment of hypertension and hyperkalemia was required significantly more frequently in the CsA-treated patients than in the Aza-treated patients. Initial mean hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the CsA group than in the Aza group (15.6 +/- 9.5 v 19.8 +/- 10.7 days). In the CsA group, 19% of the patients were switched to Aza and 35% had Aza added to their regimen with a concomitant lowering of the CsA dose because of nephrotoxicity. The results of our randomized trial are at variance with those of others in that the graft survival rates in our trial were not different between CsA and Aza-treated patients, primarily because our conventionally-treated patients had a higher graft survival rate than in the other trials. The advantages of CsA (fewer rejection episodes, fewer infections, shorter hospitalization) outweigh the disadvantages (higher serum creatinine, more hypertension), and thus we believe it should be used in most renal allograft recipients, perhaps in combination with Aza so that a lower dose of CsA can be used and the side effects minimized--a regimen that we are currently evaluating.     

Mycophenolate mofetil, an alternative to cyclosporine A for long-term immunosuppression in kidney transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) is a nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressant most often used in combination with cyclosporine A (CsA) and prednisone (Pred). This study reports the outcome of 17 adult renal recipients whose immunosuppressive regimen was changed from CsA-Pred to MMF-Pred because of CsA nephrotoxicity. METHODS: CsA nephrotoxicity was diagnosed in all patients based on suggestive histopathological lesions on a renal biopsy. Sixteen patients had deteriorating graft function and 1 had isolated persistent proteinuria. Immunosuppressive therapy was changed 57+/-32 months posttransplant. RESULTS: After replacement of CsA by MMF, a reduction in serum creatinine was observed in all patients (mean 26+/-17%). This reduction was maintained 20+/-8 months after the change in therapy without any episodes of acute rejection. Serum lipids and blood pressure also decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MMF-Pred can be an effective long-term immunosuppressive treatment alternative for renal transplant patients experiencing CsA nephrotoxicity. Such treatment may result in improved graft function, and better control of hypertension and hyperlipidemia.     

Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology Monitoring of Elective Conversion from Cyclosporin to Azathioprine and Prednisolone

The elective conversion of renal allograft recipients from cyclosporin(CsA) to azathioprine and prednisolone has the advantage thatthe long-term risk of CsA nephrotoxicity is reduced, but itmay precipitate a rejection episode. We have monitored thisperiod by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in 24 patientsundergoing conversion of immunosuppression 6 months after transplantation. As expected the serum creatinine and alkaline phosphatase weresignificantly reduced and the mean creatinine clearance wassignificantly increased after conversion. FNAC exhibited increasedmononuclear cellular infiltration in 13 of the 24 patients.In nine patients there was a transient infiltration of lymphocytesand monocytes without changes in the normal parameters of renalfunction. In four others ‘blast’ cell infiltrationwas evident in association with rejection episodes. All fourresponded to pulsed doses of methylprednisolone. However, twoother patients had late rejection episodes (2 and 6 months afterconversion) which were steroid resistant and required reintroductionof CsA. No grafts were lost (median follow-up 9 months). This study has shown that although overt rejection occurredin only 16.6% of patients, cellular infiltration was presentin over 50% during conversion of immunosuppression. FNAC failedto identify clearly the patients at risk of rejection duringconversion of therapy.     

The role of the protocol biopsies in renal allograft recipients

Subclinical rejection and long-term cyclosporine nephrotoxicity are well-known risk factors of chronic allograft nephropathy. In a prospective study 32 low-risk patients were randomized to either a reduced CsA dose (5 mg/kg/d) and daclizumab (group A, n = 16) for 7 months posttransplant with subsequent CsA tapering/withdrawal, or to a normal CsA dose (10 mg/kg/day) without daclizumab (group B, n = 16). Both groups received MMF and prednisone. Protocol biopsies were obtained at engraftment and 3 and 12 months after Tx. The number of rejection episodes was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were: renal function, histological parameters related to CsA, and serum levels of TGF-beta and PDGF-BB. A low incidence of clinically suspected rejection episodes was observed (19% in group A and 12.4% in group B; P = NS). Although protocol biopsies showed 12 subclinical rejection episodes (six in group A, six in group B), serum creatinine levels were not different between the examined groups at 3 months. However, at 12 months, there was a statistically improved mean creatinine level in group A patients (1.2 mg/dL +/- 0.5 in group A vs 1.54 mg/dL in group B; P <.05). Chronic histopathologic changes were significant for biopsies at 3 and 12 months in both groups compared to the baseline findings for protocol biopsies (with no differences between groups, or between 3 and 12 months in both groups). Serum TGF-beta and PDGF-BB did not differ between the groups. Protocol biopsies may be useful to monitor safety and efficiency of new immunosuppressive protocols. Immunosuppressive regimens with low CsA doses followed by the drug's complete withdrawal seem to be efficient and safe in low-risk kidney allograft recipients.     

Withdrawal of cyclosporine or prednisone six months after kidney transplantation in patients on triple drug therapy: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study

Uncertainty exists regarding the necessity of continuing triple therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) after kidney transplantation (RTx). At 6 mo after RTx, 212 patients were randomized to stop CsA (n = 63), stop Pred (n = 76), or continue triple drug therapy (n = 73). The MMF dose was 1000 mg twice daily, target CsA trough levels were 150 ng/ml, and Pred dose was 0.10 mg/kg per d. Follow-up was until 24 mo after RTx. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 14 (22%) of 63 patients after CsA withdrawal compared with 3 (4%) of 76 in the Pred withdrawal group (P = 0.001) and 1 (1.4%) of 73 in the control group (P = 0.0001). Biopsy-proven chronic rejection was present in one patient in the control group, in nine patients after CsA withdrawal (P = 0.006 versus control group); and in four patients after discontinuation of Pred (NS). Graft loss occurred in two versus one patient after CsA or Pred withdrawal, respectively, and in two patients in the control group (NS). Patients who successfully withdrew CsA had a significantly lower serum creatinine during follow-up. Pred withdrawal resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure, and the total cholesterol/HDL ratio increased. In conclusion, rapid CsA withdrawal at 6 mo after RTx results in a significantly increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute and chronic rejection. Pred withdrawal was safe and resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure. However, patient and graft survival and renal function 2 yr after RTx were not different among groups.     

Impact of cyclosporine on renal transplant practice at the University of Texas Medical School at Houston

CsA has improved the outcome of renal allotransplantation with CAD and LRD kidneys. CsA mitigates risk factors heretofore presenting substantial obstacles to CAD transplantation: HLA matching, pretransplant splenectomy, extensive numbers of conditioning blood transfusions, and old age. In LRD transplantation, CsA obviates the need for donor-specific transfusions in the haploidentical situation, and for prednisone in the HLA-identical setting. The incidence of drug-induced nephrotoxicity beyond six months is 30% with the degree of dysfunction proportionate to the degree of histo-incompatibility, suggesting that subclinical allograft rejection due to overzealous dose reduction may compromise allograft function. At present, total conversion from CsA to Aza appears ill-advised; even patients who never suffered allograft rejection under CsA therapy frequently lose their allograft when the inferior level of Aza suppression is substituted. Drug-induced hypertension, a modestly significant factor, diminishes further by two years posttransplant. The benefit of CsA therapy is a reduced incidence of 19% initial and 10% recurrent rejection episodes. Of great importance is the observation that 17% of rejection episodes followed patient noncompliance. Further, the incidence of bacterial infections was greatly reduced, and viral infections modestly lessened. Only the occurrence of pneumocystis carinii was increased, but 92% of patients survived in spite of serious pulmonary infection. Development of a consistent CsA regimen has reduced the median initial hospitalization to 12.5 days for LRD and 14 days for CAD, a level well within the range stipulated for the Disease-Related Guidelines of the Medicare Program. Furthermore, readmission is less frequent; one-third of patients never reenter the hospital.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recurrent or De Novo IgA Nephropathy with Crescent Formation after Renal Transplantation

IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerular disease in China, accounting for 38.8% of primary glomerular disease. It has been reported that 20.8% patients of IgA nephropathy had a different degree of crescent formation. From January 1995 to December 2004, 1000 patients had undergone cadaveric renal transplantation, and 1742 allograft renal biopsies were reviewed in the Department of Nephrology at Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University. Among them, 18 cases were found with crescent formation, in which 10 patients were diagnosed as recurrent or de novo IgA nephropathy because their immunofluorescence showed strong IgA deposition in mesangial area and capillary. The initial treatment protocol was CsA+Azp+Pred, except in two cases of CsA+MMF+Pred. There were 8 males and 2 females, with ages from 25 to 69 (mean of 37.1) years old. All of them showed progressive renal dysfunction with increasing level of serum creatinine ranged from 1.48 to 6.25 mg/dL. Seven cases presented edema with an increasing level of proteinuria (1.36 to 3.58 g/24hr), and nine cases presented with hematuria ranging from 50 to 1250 × 10⁴/mL (one showed gross hematuria). In pathological examinations, they showed mesangial proliferation and matrix expansion with 10% to 66.7% crescents (mean of 37.5%) in their allograft renal biopsy's samples. All patients changed their immunosuppressive regimens; however, nine of them eventually advanced to ESRD and returned to hemodialysis after 6 to 36 months. Two cases received second renal transplantation after six months to five years, and one kept stable renal function with 2.5 mg/dL of serum creatinine after three years of follow-up. IgA nephropathy with crescentic formation was not rare in renal allografts or native glomerulonephritis in Chinese patients. These patients showed rapidly progressive renal dysfunction, and most of them lost graft function and needed hemodialysis therapy.