Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide 160 μg once daily vs. budesonide 400 μg once daily in children with asthma

Ciclesonide is an onsite-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. This study compared the efficacy, safety and effect on quality of life (QOL) of ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator; nominal dose 200 microg) vs. budesonide 400 microg (nominal dose) in children with asthma. Six hundred and twenty-one children (aged 6-11 yr) with asthma were randomized to receive ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily (via hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler and AeroChamber Plus spacer) or budesonide 400 microg once daily (via Turbohaler) both given in the evening for 12 wk. The primary efficacy end-point was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Additional measurements included change in daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), change in asthma symptom score sum, change in use of rescue medication, paediatric and caregiver asthma QOL questionnaire [PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ, respectively] scores, change in body height assessed by stadiometry, change in 24-h urinary cortisol adjusted for creatinine and adverse events. Both ciclesonide and budesonide increased FEV1, morning PEF and PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ scores, and improved asthma symptom score sums and the need for rescue medication after 12 wk vs. baseline. The non-inferiority of ciclesonide vs. budesonide was demonstrated for the change in FEV1 (95% confidence interval: -75, 10 ml, p = 0.0009, one-sided non-inferiority, per-protocol). In addition, ciclesonide and budesonide showed similar efficacy in improving asthma symptoms, morning PEF, use of rescue medication and QOL. Ciclesonide was superior to budesonide with regard to increases in body height (p = 0.003, two-sided). The effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was significantly different in favor of ciclesonide treatment (p < 0.001, one-sided). Both ciclesonide and budesonide were well tolerated. Ciclesonide 160 microg once daily and budesonide 400 microg once daily were effective in children with asthma. In addition, in children treated with ciclesonide there was significantly less reduction in body height and suppression of 24-h urinary cortisol excretion compared with children treated with budesonide after 12 wk.     

A randomised controlled trial of short term growth and collagen turnover in asthmatics treated with inhaled formoterol and budesonide.

AIMS: To determine effects on short term growth and collagen turnover of adding formoterol (Eformoterol) to half the glucocorticoid dose in children with asthma, treated with inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler). DESIGN: A randomised double blind, placebo controlled crossover study with two six-week periods. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in secondary referral centre. SUBJECTS: A total of 27 prepubertal children aged 6-13 years. INTERVENTIONS: Formoterol 12 microg and dry powder budesonide 100 microg twice daily in one period; placebo and dry powder budesonide 200 microg twice daily in the other. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were lower leg growth rate, and serum and urine markers of type I and type III collagen turnover. Secondary outcome measures were inflammation markers in serum, and parameters of asthma control. RESULTS: During budesonide 200 microg twice daily treatment, mean lower leg growth rate was 0.14 mm/week (p = 0.02) lower than during the formoterol and budesonide period. Similar statistically significant effects on markers of collagen turnover were found, whereas inflammation markers and asthma control did not vary statistically significantly between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: In children treated with inhaled glucocorticoids, halving the dose and adding formoterol is associated with faster short term growth and an increase in markers of collagen turnover, with no loss of asthma control.     

布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂与布地奈德粉吸入剂联合富马酸福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗哮喘的疗效及安全性

目的 观察布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂与布地奈德粉吸入剂联合富马酸福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗儿童哮喘的疗效及安全性.方法 采用随机、开放、平行对照研究方法 ,将80例中度哮喘患儿随机分为治疗组和对照组.治疗组应用布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗12个月,对照组应用布地奈德粉吸入剂加富马酸福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗12个月.分别于治疗前及治疗1个月、3个月、6个月、9个月、12个月进行随访,观察期内由患儿家长记录哮喘日记,包括日间和夜间咳嗽症状评分.根据患儿家长记录计算日间和夜间咳嗽症状评分.同时测量患儿最大呼气流量(PEF),每月进行一次儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT),并观察不良反应发生情况.应用SPSS 12.0软件进行统计学分析.结果 治疗组临床控制率明显优于对照组,二组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗1个月、3个月、6个月、9个月、12个月,治疗组和对照组与治疗前比较,日、夜间咳嗽情况评分、PEF值及C-ACT评分均明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(Pa<0.05).治疗组治疗后日、夜间症状评分、PEF值均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(Pa<0.05),但C-ACT评分比较差异无统计学意义(Pa>0.05).结论 布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂与布地奈德粉吸入剂联合富马酸福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗均具有良好的疗效及安全性,但应用布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂效果更好.     

Low‐dose budesonide improves exercise‐induced bronchospasm in schoolchildren

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of low‐dose inhaled budesonide (once or twice daily) and placebo, administered via Turbuhaler^®, on exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with mild asthma. Fifty‐seven steroid‐naive children (7–16 years old; 41 boys, 16 girls) with EIB participated in this sub‐population study according to the following inclusion criterion: a maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s ( FEV ₁) ≥ 10% after a standardized treadmill test. Mean baseline FEV ₁ was 100.3% of predicted, and mean maximum fall in FEV ₁ after the standardized exercise test was 22%. The study was a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐group design. After 2 weeks of run‐in, the children received inhaled budesonide 100 µg or 200 µg once daily in the morning, 100 µg twice daily, or placebo, for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks of treatment, the fall in FEV ₁ after the exercise test was significantly less in all three budesonide groups (7.2–7.8%) vs. placebo (16.7%). Daytime symptom scores were significantly lower in all three budesonide groups compared with placebo (p < 0.02). The three budesonide groups did not differ significantly, and no significant change in lung function was found in any group. Therefore children with mild asthma, but with significant EIB, improved their exercise tolerance and symptom control after 3 months of treatment with a low dose of inhaled budesonide given once or twice daily.     

A randomised controlled trial of short term growth and collagen turnover in asthmatics treated with inhaled formoterol and budesonide

AIMS—To determine effects on short term growth and collagen turnover of adding formoterol (Eformoterol) to half the glucocorticoid dose in children with asthma, treated with inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler).
DESIGN—A randomised double blind, placebo controlled crossover study with two six-week periods.
SETTING—Outpatient clinic in secondary referral centre.
SUBJECTS—A total of 27 prepubertal children aged 6-13 years.
INTERVENTIONS—Formoterol 12 µg and dry powder budesonide 100 µg twice daily in one period; placebo and dry powder budesonide 200 µg twice daily in the other.
OUTCOME MEASURES—Primary outcome measures were lower leg growth rate, and serum and urine markers of type I and type III collagen turnover. Secondary outcome measures were inflammation markers in serum, and parameters of asthma control.
RESULTS—During budesonide 200 µg twice daily treatment, mean lower leg growth rate was 0.14 mm/week (p = 0.02) lower than during the formoterol and budesonide period. Similar statistically significant effects on markers of collagen turnover were found, whereas inflammation markers and asthma control did not vary statistically significantly between the two periods.
CONCLUSIONS—In children treated with inhaled glucocorticoids, halving the dose and adding formoterol is associated with faster short term growth and an increase in markers of collagen turnover, with no loss of asthma control.

     

Montelukast added to budesonide in children with persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that adding montelukast to budesonide would improve asthma control in children with inhaled glucocorticoid-dependent persistent asthma. STUDY DESIGN: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study, we compared the benefit of adding montelukast, 5 mg, or placebo once daily to budesonide, 200 microg, twice daily. RESULTS: After a 1-month run-in with budesonide, 200 microg, twice daily, 279 children were randomized to montelukast or placebo. The mean +/- SD age was 10.4 +/- 2.2 years, the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 77.7% +/- 10.6% predicted, and reversibility was 18.1% +/- 12.9%. Compared with adding placebo to budesonide, adding montelukast produced significant improvements in mean percent change from baseline FEV(1) (P =.062 [P =.010 for per-protocol analysis]), mean absolute change from baseline FEV(1) (P =.040), mean increase from baseline in morning (P =.023) and evening (P =.012) peak expiratory flows, decrease in exacerbation days by approximately 23% (P <.001), decreased beta2-agonist use (P =.013), and reduced blood eosinophil counts (P <.001). The treatments did not differ significantly with regard to safety. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast, 5 mg, added to budesonide improved asthma control significantly, indicated by a small additive effect on lung function and a clinically relevant decrease in asthma exacerbation days.     

Fluticasone propionate in asthma: a long term dose comparison study.

BACKGROUND: Few dose ranging studies have investigated optimal dosing with inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 microg twice daily in children with moderate to severe asthma for one year. METHODS: One year, randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study. Children aged 4-11 years (n = 528) with moderate to severe asthma who had previously received high dose inhaled corticosteroids were given fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 microg twice daily for the 52 week treatment period. Efficacy (exacerbations, lung function, and symptoms) and tolerability (adverse events and cortisol levels) were measured. RESULTS: There was a non-significant decreased risk of experiencing an exacerbation at any time with fluticasone propionate 200 microg twice daily compared with fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily. This difference reached significance among patients with more severe asthma (defined by previous inhaled corticosteroid dose >800 microg/day). Daily record card morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the total population improved significantly more with the higher dose of fluticasone propionate (between group difference, weeks 1-52: 11.4 l/min). Clinic visit mean PEF improved from baseline with both doses, but the response was significantly greater with the higher dose (between group difference, week 52: 17.8 l/min). Both doses were equally well tolerated and overnight urinary cortisol concentrations were unchanged or slightly increased during treatment with either dose. CONCLUSION: This long term dose comparison study shows that treatment with fluticasone propionate 200 micro g twice daily may offer benefits over a lower dose, particularly in children with more severe asthma.     

Effect of formoterol on clinical parameters and lung functions in patients with bronchial asthma: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: To determine the role of formoterol in the treatment of children with bronchial asthma who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled study to investigate the effects of inhaled formoterol (12 microg twice a day) in 32 children with moderate to severe bronchial asthma. The study consisted of two week run in periods and six week treatment periods, during both of which the patients continued their regular anti-inflammatory drugs. The efficacy parameters were symptom scores, bronchodilator use, daily peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), methacholine hyper-reactivity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), lung volumes, and airway conductance. RESULTS: Formoterol treatment for six weeks decreased symptom scores, PEFR variability, and the number of rescue salbutamol doses, and increased morning and evening PEFR significantly. No adverse reactions were seen. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that inhaled formoterol is effective in controlling chronic asthma symptoms in children who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Montelukast vs. inhaled low-dose budesonide as monotherapy in the treatment of mild persistent asthma: a randomized double blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend daily controller therapy for mild persistent asthma. Montelukast has demonstrated consistent benefit in controlling symptoms of asthma and may be an alternative, orally administered, nonsteroidal agent for treating mild asthma. Aim: To determine whether montelukast is as effective as budesonide in controlling mild persistent asthma as determined by FEV(1). METHODS: Between November 2003 to October 2005, participants aged 5-15 years with recently diagnosed mild persistent asthma (n = 62) were randomized to oral montelukast (5 mg daily) [N(1) = 30] or inhaled budesonide (400 microg per day in two doses) [N(2) = 32] in a single center, double-blind study. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and spirometric parameters were comparable. The median (95% confidence interval) percentage predicted FEV(1) was similar in the two groups after 12 weeks of treatment (budesonide: 76.70 (67.96-90.53%), montelukast: 75 (67.40-88.47)%; p = 0.44). There was similar improvement in spirometric parameters and clinical symptom scores in both the groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the need for rescue drugs as well as side effects reported by parents. CONCLUSION: Montelukast is as effective as inhaled budesonide in the treatment of mild persistent asthma in children aged 5-15 years. Montelukast may be used as an alternative to low dose inhaled corticosteroids for management of mild persistent asthma.     

Daily versus as-needed inhaled corticosteroid for mild persistent asthma (The Helsinki early intervention childhood asthma study).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of inhaled budesonide given daily or as-needed on mild persistent childhood asthma. Patients, design and INTERVENTIONS: 176 children aged 5-10 years with newly detected asthma were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: (1) continuous budesonide (400 microg twice daily for 1 month, 200 microg twice daily for months 2-6, 100 microg twice daily for months 7-18); (2) budesonide, identical treatment to group 1 during months 1-6, then budesonide for exacerbations as needed for months 7-18; and (3) disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) 10 mg three times daily for months 1-18. Exacerbations were treated with budesonide 400 microg twice daily for 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lung function, the number of exacerbations and growth. RESULTS: Compared with DSCG the initial regular budesonide treatment resulted in a significantly improved lung function, fewer exacerbations and a small but significant decline in growth velocity. After 18 months, however, the lung function improvements did not differ between the groups. During months 7-18, patients receiving continuous budesonide treatment had significantly fewer exacerbations (mean 0.97), compared with 1.69 in group 2 and 1.58 in group 3. The number of asthma-free days did not differ between regular and intermittent budesonide treatment. Growth velocity was normalised during continuous low-dose budesonide and budesonide therapy given as needed. The latter was associated with catch-up growth. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of budesonide afforded better asthma control but had a more systemic effect than did use of budesonide as needed. The dose of ICS could be reduced as soon as asthma is controlled. Some children do not seem to need continuous ICS treatment.     

Prophylactic intermittent treatment with inhaled corticosteroids of asthma exacerbations due to airway infections in toddlers

The aim of this study was to investigate whether budesonide, for 10 d, administered at the first sign of an upper respiratory tract infection, could reduce asthma symptoms in 1-3-y-old children with asthma during infections. The primary efficacy variable was symptom scores. The study had a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with parallel groups. Fifty-five children with a mean age of 26 months received either budesonide or placebo via a spacer with a facemask. Each child was monitored for 1 y. Budesonide was given 400 microg q.i.d. for the first 3 d and b.i.d. for 7 d. Symptoms (cough, wheeze, noisy breathing and breathlessness) were scored (0-3) daily by the parents. Asthma symptom scores were lower in children treated with budesonide than in those given placebo. The effect was most pronounced for cough and noisy breathing, but it did not affect the need for hospital care. In conclusion, treatment with budesonide, started at the first sign of a respiratory infection, reduced asthma symptoms in toddlers with episodic asthma.     

Budesonide: safety and efficacy aspects of its long-term use in children

Fifty-two asthmatic children aged 4 to 13 years (mean 9. 6) were enrolled in this open 12-month study of budesonide, 200 meg bid, administered by tube-spacer inhaler (INHALETE® ASTRA DRACO). The aim of the study was to assess long-term safety, as well as efficacy, of budesonide in children whose asthma was not adequately controlled by their current therapy. Children attended the clinic every three months for assessment of lung function and height. In addition, an adrenal function test and routine clinical chemistry and haematology were performed. Parents completed diary cards once each week, recording the child's PEF, asthma symptoms, β₂-agonist consumption and other medication (no prophylactic drugs or other inhaled steroids were allowed and oral steroids were used for emergency treatment only). There were significant increases in all clinic lung function tests (baseline to last visit) and in diary card PEF (first 3 months vs last 3 months). These were accompanied by decreases in asthma symptoms and use of β₂-agonists or other medication. There was no indication that growth was affected by study treatment and basal adrenal function (basal cortisol) did not change significantly throughout the study. The adrenal response to Synacthen had actually increased significantly by the end of the study. No serious adverse events were associated with budesonide treatment. In conclusion, regular budesonide therapy was associated with a significant improvement in lung function and symptoms over one year. Budesonide was well-tolerated by the children and appeared to have no adverse influence on either growth or adrenal function.     

布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂对中度支气管哮喘患儿小呼吸道功能的影响

目的 观察布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗儿童中度支气管哮喘的疗效和不良反应及对小呼吸道功能的影响.方法 选取青岛大学医学院附属医院哮喘专家门诊初诊的中度支气管哮喘患儿40例,病例均未接受过正规吸入激素治疗.入院后给予布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂,每次1吸,每天2次,治疗12周.分别在治疗4周、8周、12周进行哮喘控制水平(控制、部分控制、未控制)评估,同时测定其肺功能,包括一秒钟用力呼气量(FEV1)占预计值百分比、最大呼气流量(PEF)占预计值百分比、25%用力呼气肺活量(FEF25)、50%用力呼气肺活量(FEF50)、75%用力呼气肺活量(FEF75),并观察不良反应发生情况.对治疗前后肺功能结果 进行比较,同时进行病情评估.结果 1.临床控制率:治疗12周,临床控制36例(90%),部分控制4例(10%),总有效率为100%.2.肺功能改善情况:在治疗4周,FEV1、PEF、FEF25、FEF50、FEF75均有显著改善,且在12周的随访过程中,上述指标得到持续改善.治疗12周FEF75、FEF50、FEF25均恢复到正常水平.结论 布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗儿童中度支气管哮喘,对缓解症状和改善肺功能均有良好效果,尤其可有效改善哮喘患儿小呼吸道功能,从而达到哮喘临床控制或部分控制,且不良反应发生率低.     

Efficacy of fluticasone metered-dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler for pediatric asthma.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of bronchial asthma, two types of fluticasone inhaler devices are available, namely, metered-dose inhaler with spacer (MDI-S) and the dry powder inhaler (DPI). The former is recommended for young children with a low peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and the latter for adolescents and adults. But the difference in the therapeutic efficacy between them has been studied only rarely in adolescent patients. METHODS: In the present study, 21 post-elementary school-age patients with moderate persistent bronchial asthma (age 8-15 years, 10.3 +/- 2.1 years), who all had a sufficient PIF of 114 +/- 29 L/min, were examined in order to compare the two types of fluticasone inhalers. Eleven of 21 patients inhaled 200 microg/day Flutide using the MDI-S twice daily for 1 month in the first month, and the same dose using the DPI for the next month. The other 10 patients inhaled the opposite regimens. At the end of the each treatment, spirometry was examined. RESULTS: Measurements done before therapy and then at the end of MDI-S and DPI therapy, respectively, were as follows: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1.0)), 72.4 +/- 18.2%, 91.5 +/- 18.2% and 84.1 +/- 16.3% (MDI-S vs DPI, P > 0.040); maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), 62.0 +/- 23.6%, 88.7 +/- 26.5%, 79.3 +/- 33.4% (P > 0.044) and the peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 73.9 +/- 25.0%, 95.6 +/- 32.8%, and 90.5 +/- 29.5%, respectively (n.s.). MDI-S was thus found to be more effective in terms of %FEV(1.0) and in %MMEF. CONCLUSIONS: High therapeutic efficacy was obtained with the use of the MDI-S in fluticasone inhalation for post-elementary school-age patients with sufficient inspiration ability.     

Early intervention of recent onset mild persistent asthma in children aged under 11 yrs: the Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma (START) trial

Inhaled corticosteroids are known to be effective in persistent asthma, but their long-term effect in mild persistent disease of recent onset, which is particularly relevant in children, requires clarification. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy of regular inhaled low-dose budesonide in children aged <11 yrs with mild persistent asthma with onset within 2 yrs of enrollment. Children aged 5–10 yrs formed part of the population of the inhaled Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma (START) study, and they were randomized in a double-blind manner to treatment with once daily budesonide 200  μ g or placebo via Turbuhaler^TM in addition to usual clinical care and other asthma medication. The double-blind treatment phase continued for 3 yrs. Of the 1974 children, 1000 in the budesonide group and 974 in the placebo group, were analyzed for efficacy. Addition of once-daily budesonide to usual care was associated with a significant increase in the time to first severe asthma-related event (SARE) and significantly reduced risk of SARE over 3 yrs. The hazard ratio relative to usual care (placebo) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval: 0.40–0.90; p = 0.012), with a relative risk reduction of 40%. Children receiving budesonide also needed significantly less intervention with other inhaled corticosteroids (12.3% vs. 22.5% over 3 yrs; p < 0.01), with trends towards decreased usage of oral/systemic corticosteroids and inhaled short-acting β ₂-agonists. Budesonide treatment also had a significant beneficial effect on lung function relative to placebo. In conclusion, early intervention adding once-daily budesonide to usual care in children with mild, persistent asthma of recent onset reduces the long-term risk and frequency of SAREs and improves lung function compared with usual care alone.     

Co-administration of salbutamol and fluticasone for emergency treatment of children with moderate acute asthma.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nebulized therapy with salbutamol alone or in combination with fluticasone. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 150 children with moderate acute asthma were randomly assigned to receive by nebulizations either (i) three doses of salbutamol 30 microl/kg per dose, each dose administered every 15 min, (ii) three doses of salbutamol plus two doses of fluticasone 500 microg/dose at 15 and 30 min after first dose of salbutamol, or (iii) three doses of salbutamol/fluticasone 500 microg/dose, each combined dose administered every 15 min. Pulse oxymetry (SaO2), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and Wood et al. (Am J Dis Child, 123, 1972, 123) clinical scale were evaluated at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the first nebulization. Patients in the three groups significantly improved since 15 min after the first nebulization. We did not observe differences in the recovery of SaO2 and PEF among the three groups of treatment (p > 0.10). In group 3, children showed better clinical response at 120 min than the other two groups (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed with any treatment. To summarize, in children with acute moderate asthma, nebulized salbutamol at an accumulated dose of 90 mul/kg plus fluticasone at an accumulated dose of 1500 microg produced better clinical relief after 2 h. However, similar PEF and SaO2 responses were observed with salbutamol alone or in combination with different doses of fluticasone.     

Cost-effectiveness of early intervention with once-daily budesonide in children with mild persistent asthma: results from the START study

The inhaled Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma (START) study has shown that early intervention with inhaled budesonide in mild persistent asthma improves clinical outcomes in both adults and children. The aim of this study was to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of early treatment with budesonide Turbuhaler in children aged 5–10 yr who participated in START. Direct and indirect costs associated with asthma were determined for 1974 children participating in the double-blind, 3-year part of the study. Randomization was to placebo or to budesonide 200  μ g once daily in each case in addition to usual asthma care. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from the healthcare payer's and societal perspectives (using US prices). The addition of once-daily budesonide therapy to usual asthma care was associated with 16 additional symptom-free days (SFDs) per child over the 3-yr period (p < 0.001), with a substantial reduction (50%) in the mean number of days spent in hospital, and with reduced frequency of emergency room visits and missed school and caregiver work days. From the healthcare payer's perspective (direct costs), the increase in mean direct cost over 3 yr with budesonide was $169, which translated into an incremental cost of early intervention with budesonide in children of $10.50 (95% CI $1.20–33.30) per SFD gained. From the societal perspective, there was a cost reduction over 3 yr of $192 with budesonide relative to placebo. From a societal perspective, budesonide was therefore dominant. In conclusion, early intervention with once-daily budesonide added to usual asthma care in children with mild persistent asthma is cost-saving from a societal perspective and is acceptably cost-effective when viewed from a healthcare payer perspective.     

�����͵����ϸ�Ī������˫�����������͵¸ɷ������Ʒ��Զ�ͯ��ȳ�������������Ч�۲�

目的观察布地耐德(BUD)联用福莫特罗(FOM)与单用双倍剂量BUD干粉吸入疗法对轻度持续性哮喘患儿的有效性和安全性,探讨儿童轻度持续性哮喘的理想治疗方案。方法选取2005-01—2005-06在广州医学院附属第一医院呼研所专科门诊就诊的轻度持续哮喘患儿50例,采取开放、随机、平行对照方法把50例患儿分为两组,分别吸入BUD联用FOM(B+F组)或双倍剂量BUD(Double B组)8周,药物均用都保干粉吸入装置吸入。8周的观察期内由患儿或家长记录哮喘日记,包括日间和夜间症状评分、无症状天数、其它平喘药物(包括应急用速效β2-受体激动剂、长效缓释茶碱、口服长效β2-受体激动剂、全身用糖皮质激素)使用情况,同时以简易峰流速仪监测其呼气峰流速值(PEF)作为主要肺功能指标。结果B+F组和Double B组在治疗8周后,日间症状及PEF均较治疗前明显改善,无症状天数明显增加,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);与治疗前比较,B+F组在治疗8周后夜间症状评分明显下降(P<0.05),而Double B组治疗前后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组间日间症状评分、夜间症状评分、无症状天数及PEF治疗前及治疗后比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组间病情反复发作次数、需联合应用速效β2-受体激动剂次数及口服强的松、长效缓释茶碱或口服长效β2-受体激动剂的天数均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论低剂量吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)联用长效β2-受体激动剂(LABA)与单用双倍剂量ICS治疗儿童轻度持续性哮喘的疗效相当。但从减少或避免ICS潜在的全身性副反应方面考虑,联用低剂量ICS+LABA可能是更好的选择。     

Intermittent treatment with inhaled steroids for deterioration of asthma due to upper respiratory tract infections

Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a common cause of deterioration of asthma in children. We investigated if inhaled steroids (budesonide), started early after URTI, could reduce asthma. Thirty-one children, 3-10 years of age, with deterioration during URTI participated. The study design was double-blind, crossover and placebo-controlled. Peak-expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom scores were recorded. Four treatment periods of 9 days, two with budesonide and two with placebo, were planned. Treatment was started at the first sign of URTI. Budesonide/placebo was given by Turbuhaler at 0.2 mg qid for 3 days, tid for 3 and bid for the last 3 days. Twenty-two children completed 67 periods. Eleven visited the emergency room, only three during budesonide therapy. Five received oral steroids and two where admitted to hospital, all receiving placebo. Symptom scores were not significantly lower during budesonide treatment. PEF, both morning and evening, was significantly higher during budesonide than placebo (p = 0.015 and p = 0.022). Inhaled budesonide can attenuate exacerbation of URTI-induced asthma. Asthma, budesonide, infection, inhaled steroids, intermittent, prophylactic
J Svedmyr, Department of Paediatrics, Falu Hospital, S-791 82 Falun, Sweden     

吸入糖皮质激素对支气管哮喘患儿血清基质金属蛋白酶9及基质金属蛋白酶抑制物1的影响

目的 观察吸入糖皮质激素对支气管哮喘(哮喘)患儿血清基质金属蛋白酶9( MMP-9)及基质金属蛋白酶抑制物1( TIMP-1)的影响,探讨糖皮质激素降低呼吸道重塑的机制.方法 哮喘患儿50例.给予糖皮质激素信必可都保(布地奈德/福莫特罗粉吸入剂),每吸含布地奈德80 μg、福莫特罗4.5 μg,每日2次,疗程12周,采用ELISA法测定布地奈德/福莫特罗粉吸入剂吸入前后,血清MMP-9、TIMP-1水平及肺功能指标[第1秒最大呼气量(FEV1)、最大呼气流速峰值(PEF)]的变化,并对二者进行相关性分析.结果 使用吸入糖皮质激素布地奈德/福莫特罗粉剂后,哮喘患儿血清MMP-9水平由吸入前的(43.25±13.26) μg?L-1下降至(29.62±12.47) μ.g? L-1,TIMP-1由吸入前的(119.88±32.56)μg?L-1上升至(143.15±45.36) μg?L-1,差异均有统计学意义(Pa＜0.01).PEF及FEV1变异占预计值百分比分别由吸入前的(76.15±3.26)％,(73.12±4.63)％,上升至(85.42±4.73)％,(86.49±3.72)％,PEF及FEV1变异占预计值百分比与MMP-9/TIMP-1比率均呈负相关(r=-0.402、-0.364,Pa＜0.05).结论 糖皮质激素可通过调节MMP-9/TIMP-1的平衡,降低胶原沉积,从而干预呼吸道重塑的发生.