Interaction of REM Deprivation and Stage 4 Deprivation With Total Sleep Loss: Experiment 2

To determine whether prior deprivation of stage REM or stage 4 sleep would potentiate the effects of total sleep loss, 7 young adult males were denied REM sleep and 7 were denied stage 4 sleep for 3 nights before 1 night of total sleep loss. Measures of autonomic and EEG activity, mood, anxiety, Rorschach CET and on several performance tasks were obtained during baseline, following stage deprivation, total sleep loss, and during recovery. There were no marked changes in any area following 3 nights of stage REM and stage 4 deprivation. The changes following total sleep loss were similar for both groups. Prior deprivation of stage REM or stage 4 did not potentiate sleep loss effects. Ss who had no stage deprivation prior to 1 night of sleep loss had more impairment following sleep loss than did the Ss of this study.     

Sleep Stage Deprivation and Total Sleep Loss: Effects On Sleep Behavior

The combined effects of total sleep loss and the deprivation of stage 4 or stage REM were studied in I two separate experiments. Two full nights or sleep loss preceded stage 4 deprivation or stage REM deprivation in Experiment 1 (N=12); 1 full night of sleep loss followed 3 nights or stage 4 deprivation or stage REM deprivation in Experiment 2 (N=I4). Total sleep loss before sleep stage deprivation significantly increased the number of attempts to enter stage 4, but had little influence on stage REM. A significant REM rebound was found in only one of the REM-deprived groups, but there was a significant stage 4 rebound in all groups on the first full recovery night, supporting the hypothesis from other studies that stage 4 has priority over REM in terms of recovery from sleep loss. The results suggested that stages 2, 3, and 4 partially overlap in their recuperative functions.     

Effect of sleep disruption on sleep, performance, and mood

Eleven young adult subjects were briefly awakened after each minute of electroencephalographic-defined sleep for 2 consecutive nights after undisturbed laboratory adaptation and baseline nights. Two undisturbed recovery nights followed disruption nights. On disruption nights, subjects were awakened with an audiometer and signaled the awakening by subjective rating of sleep state or button push response. The disruption procedure resulted in severely fragmented sleep with only very small amounts of slow-wave and REM sleep. Total sleep time was reduced by approximately 1 h on each night. Arousal threshold increased 56 dB across the disruption nights. Following disruption, subjects performed more poorly and rated themselves sleepier than on baseline. The level of decline was similar to that seen after periods of total sleep loss of 40-64 h. Recovery sleep was also similar to that seen after total sleep loss. It was concluded that periodic disruption of sleep, perhaps by destroying sleep continuity, quickly results in impaired function. These data may help explain function loss in severe sleep apneics.     

Recovery sleep following different visual conditions during total sleep deprivation in man.

The findings of visual impairment during total sleep deprivation were used as a basis for a possible link between vision and sleep. It was proposed that the level of visual load imposed during sleep deprivation was an important variable, and would have a substantial effect upon recovery sleep. Six young male subjects underwent two conditions of 64 h of sleep deprivation on separate occasions. One condition incorporated a high visual load, and the other a low load. Exercise and sound were balanced. All night sleep EEGs were taken for two baseline nights, and also for two recovery nights following each condition. There was a significant increase of stage 4 on all recovery nights and a REM rebound on the second recovery night. SWS, particularly stage 4, TST and REM density, were significantly greater following the high load. Implications of these findings for sleep theories and for sleep deprivation research are discussed.     

Sleep deprivation and phasic activity of REM sleep: independence of middle-ear muscle activity from rapid eye movements

In the recovery nights after total and partial sleep deprivation there is a reduction of rapid eye movements during REM sleep as compared to baseline nights; recent evidence provided by a selective SWS deprivation study also shows that the highest percentage of variance of this reduction is explained by SWS rebound. The present study assesses whether the reduction of rapid eye movements (REMs) during the recovery night after total sleep deprivation is paralleled by a decrease of middle-ear muscle activity (MEMA), another phasic muscle activity of REM sleep. Standard polysomnography, MEMA and REMs of nine subjects were recorded for three nights (one adaptation, one baseline, one recovery); baseline and recovery night were separated by a period of 40 hours of continuous wake. Results show that, in the recovery night, sleep deprivation was effective in determining an increase of SWS amount and of the sleep efficiency index, and a decrease of stage 1, stage 2, intra-sleep wake, and NREM latencies, without affecting REM duration and latency. However, MEMA frequency during REM sleep did not diminish during these nights as compared to baseline ones, while there was a clear effect of REM frequency reduction. Results indicate an independence of phasic events of REM sleep, suggesting that the inverse relation between recovery sleep after sleep deprivation and REM frequency is not paralleled by a concomitant variation in MEMA frequency.     

Biperiden administration during REM sleep deprivation diminished the frequency of REM sleep attempts.

Sixteen subjects were assigned to a group using either placebo or biperiden, with eight subjects in each group. Both groups were studied for one acclimatization night, one baseline night, four nights of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep deprivation and two recovery nights. All the subjects received either placebo or 4 mg biperiden 1 hour before sleep during the four nights of REM sleep deprivation. During the baseline and the recovery nights both groups received placebo capsules. The results showed that REM sleep time during the REM sleep deprivation was reduced by 70-75% below the baseline night in both groups. The number of attempts to enter REM sleep was significantly reduced by biperiden as compared to placebo for each of the four REM sleep deprivation nights. Because the total sleep time in the biperiden group was reduced, the number of REM sleep attempts was corrected by the total sleep time. The adjusted number of REM sleep attempts was also significantly reduced in the biperiden group. REM sleep latency showed a reduction in the placebo group, whereas in the biperiden group REM sleep latency was unchanged throughout the deprivation nights. In the recovery night REM sleep time was increased in both groups, with no differences between the groups. The REM sleep latency showed a reduction in the first recovery night in both groups that persisted through the second recovery night. The above findings support the role of biperiden as a REM sleep suppressive drug.     

Performance and Sleepiness as a Function of Frequency and Placement of Sleep Disruption

Eight normal young adult sleepers spent 4 nonconsecutive weeks in the laboratory. Each week consisted of a baseline night followed by 2 consecutive nights of disrupted sleep, followed by 2 recovery nights. Disruption conditions included: a) brief awakening after each minute of accumulated sleep, b) brief awakening after each 10 min of accumulated sleep, c) 2.5 hrs of normal sleep followed by a brief awakening at each sleep onset, and d) total sleep deprivation. Morning testing revealed that all disruption conditions decreased sleep latency in a morning nap test. Performance after 1-min disruptions approximated that seen after total sleep loss. Performance decrements were less in the 10-min condition and least in the 2.5-hr sleep condition. Performance under baseline and total sleep loss conditions was used to predict performance during the sleep deprivation condition using four sleep stage rules. Total time asleep and total time asleep minus stage 1 predicted performance poorly. Total SWS plus REM predicted performance best but could not differentiate the 10-min and 2.5-hr conditions. Therefore, it was concluded that the data were most parsimoniously explained by the Sleep Continuity Theory—i.e., that periods of uninterrupted sleep in excess of 10 min are required for sleep to be restorative.     

Phosphorous31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy after total sleep deprivation in healthy adult men

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate chemical changes in the brains of healthy adults after sleep deprivation and recovery sleep, using phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy. DESIGN: Three consecutive nights (baseline, sleep deprivation, recovery) were spent in the laboratory. Objective sleep measures were assessed on the baseline and recovery nights using polysomnography. Phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy scans took place beginning at 7 am to 8 am on the morning after each of the 3 nights. SETTING: Sleep laboratory in a private psychiatric teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven healthy young men. INTERVENTIONS: Following a baseline night of sleep, subjects underwent a night of total sleep deprivation, which involved supervision to ensure the absence of sleep but was not polysomnographically monitored. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: No significant changes in any measure of brain chemistry were observed the morning after a night of total sleep deprivation. However, after the recovery night, significant increases in total and beta-nucleoside triphosphate and decreases in phospholipid catabolism, measured by an increase in the concentration of glycerylphosphorylcholine, were observed. Chemical changes paralleled some changes in objective sleep measures. CONCLUSIONS: Significant chemical changes in the brain were observed following recovery sleep after 1 night of total sleep deprivation. The specific process underlying these changes is unclear due to the large brain region sampled in this exploratory study, but changes may reflect sleep inertia or some aspect of the homeostatic sleep mechanism that underlies the depletion and restoration of sleep. Phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy is a technique that may be of value in further exploration of such sleep-wake functions.     

Effect of 64 hours of sleep deprivation upon sleep in geriatric normals and insomniacs

Fifty-eight geriatric normal and chronic insomniac sleepers were screened with sleep recordings to define groups of 12 Normal (Sleep Efficiency greater than 85%) and Insomniac (Sleep Efficiency less than 80%) sleepers. All subjects then had 4 baseline sleep nights, 64 hours of total sleep loss, and 4 recovery nights. Insomniacs, had lower sleep efficiencies and less REM than Normals during baseline. Sleep efficiency was high (97%) in both groups on the first recovery night but decreased toward baseline values in both groups between the second (Normal) and fourth (Insomniac) recovery night. The groups had relatively little slow wave sleep, but had a significant increase on the first recovery night. Five Normals and one Insomniac had REM latency of less than 15 min on their first recovery night. This REM latency was found to be significantly correlated with the amount of slow wave sleep on baseline. Decreased REM latency in initial recovery sleep was interpreted as evidence of decreased pressure for slow wave sleep in aging.     

Acute deprivation of the terminal four hours of sleep does not increase delta (0-3-Hz) electroencephalograms: a replication

This experiment evaluated further our previous finding that substitution of waking for the terminal 3-4 hr of sleep produces little or no increase in either visually scored or computer measures of delta sleep. Eleven young adults (mean age 24.5 yr) were studied on a baseline night, a night with sleep limited to an average of 188 min, and a recovery night. Visually scored sleep stages, eye movement activity and computer measures of 0-3 Hz were analyzed by nonrapid eye movement periods (NREMPs) and for all recorded sleep in each condition. In addition, we measured the heights, durations and areas under the curve manifested by the cyclic waxing and waning of 0-3-Hz integrated amplitude across sleep. Acute loss of 3.9 hr of sleep did not increase either visual or computer measures of delta electroencephalograms (EEG) on the recovery night, essentially confirming our previous findings. We hypothesize that augmentation of delta EEG above baseline levels after acute (one night's) sleep loss requires that disruption or loss of sleep from the first two NREMPs (or delta cycles). Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep durations on the recovery night were unaffected by the marked loss of REM sleep caused by partial deprivation. Although eye movements as well as stage REM were lost in the deprivation condition, eye movement density was significantly reduced rather than increased on the recovery night. This reduction is consistent with the hypothesis that REM activity varies inversely with sleep depth (or directly with central arousal level). The observations here, taken in association with previous results, suggest that a threshold for eye movement suppression by sleep deprivation in young adults lies in the range of 3-4 hr of prior sleep loss.     

The relationship between frequency of rapid eye movements in REM sleep and SWS rebound

Previous studies have shown a decrease in rapid eye movement (REM) frequency during desynchronized sleep in recovery nights following total or partial sleep deprivation. This effect has been ascribed to an increase in sleep need or sleep depth consequent to sleep length manipulations. The aims of this study were to assess REM frequency variations in the recovery night after two consecutive nights of selective slow-wave sleep (SWS) deprivation, and to evaluate the relationships between REM frequency and SWS amount and auditory arousal thresholds (AAT), as an independent index of sleep depth. Ten normal males slept for six consecutive nights in the laboratory: one adaptation, two baseline, two selective SWS deprivation and one recovery night. SWS deprivation allowed us to set the SWS amount during both deprivation nights close to zero, without any shortening of total sleep time. In the ensuing recovery night a significant SWS rebound was found, accompanied by an increase in AAT. In addition, REM frequency decreased significantly compared with baseline. This effect cannot be attributed to a variation in prior sleep duration, since there was no sleep loss during the selective SWS deprivation nights. Stepwise regression also showed that the decrease in REM frequency is not correlated with the increase in AAT, the traditional index of sleep depth, but is correlated with SWS rebound.     

Sleep and body temperature in "morning" and "evening" people

Three groups of young, normal sleepers were selected as morning types (MTs), evening types (ETs), and neither types (NTs) as determined by the Horne and Ostberg questionnaire. Sleep and rectal temperatures were recorded under three conditions: baseline nights (Cond. 1), sleep on the recovery day after 1 night of sleep deprivation (Cond. 2), and sleep on the recovery night after 1 night and 1 day of sleep deprivation (Cond. 3). During Conds. 1 and 3, when sleep schedules were self-determined, sleep structure and body temperature were similar in MTs, and ETs, and NTs. During Cond. 2, however, MTs had poorer sleep, i.e., a smaller percentage of REM sleep and more awakenings, than ETs. This difference can be related to the evolution of temperature during Cond. 2; i.e., a temperature increase in the MT and NT and a decrease in the ET.     

The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation

OBJECTIVES: To inform the debate over whether human sleep can be chronically reduced without consequences, we conducted a dose-response chronic sleep restriction experiment in which waking neurobehavioral and sleep physiological functions were monitored and compared to those for total sleep deprivation. DESIGN: The chronic sleep restriction experiment involved randomization to one of three sleep doses (4 h, 6 h, or 8 h time in bed per night), which were maintained for 14 consecutive days. The total sleep deprivation experiment involved 3 nights without sleep (0 h time in bed). Each study also involved 3 baseline (pre-deprivation) days and 3 recovery days. SETTING: Both experiments were conducted under standardized laboratory conditions with continuous behavioral, physiological and medical monitoring. PARTICIPANTS: A total of n = 48 healthy adults (ages 21-38) participated in the experiments. INTERVENTIONS: Noctumal sleep periods were restricted to 8 h, 6 h or 4 h per day for 14 days, or to 0 h for 3 days. All other sleep was prohibited. RESULTS: Chronic restriction of sleep periods to 4 h or 6 h per night over 14 consecutive days resulted in significant cumulative, dose-dependent deficits in cognitive performance on all tasks. Subjective sleepiness ratings showed an acute response to sleep restriction but only small further increases on subsequent days, and did not significantly differentiate the 6 h and 4 h conditions. Polysomnographic variables and delta power in the non-REM sleep EEG-a putative marker of sleep homeostasis--displayed an acute response to sleep restriction with negligible further changes across the 14 restricted nights. Comparison of chronic sleep restriction to total sleep deprivation showed that the latter resulted in disproportionately large waking neurobehavioral and sleep delta power responses relative to how much sleep was lost. A statistical model revealed that, regardless of the mode of sleep deprivation, lapses in behavioral alertness were near-linearly related to the cumulative duration of wakefulness in excess of 15.84 h (s.e. 0.73 h). CONCLUSIONS: Since chronic restriction of sleep to 6 h or less per night produced cognitive performance deficits equivalent to up to 2 nights of total sleep deprivation, it appears that even relatively moderate sleep restriction can seriously impair waking neurobehavioral functions in healthy adults. Sleepiness ratings suggest that subjects were largely unaware of these increasing cognitive deficits, which may explain why the impact of chronic sleep restriction on waking cognitive functions is often assumed to be benign. Physiological sleep responses to chronic restriction did not mirror waking neurobehavioral responses, but cumulative wakefulness in excess of a 15.84 h predicted performance lapses across all four experimental conditions. This suggests that sleep debt is perhaps best understood as resulting in additional wakefulness that has a neurobiological "cost" which accumulates over time.     

Body Movements During Sleep After Sleep Loss

Following 4 baseline nights, 7 Ss were deprived of REM sleep for 3 nights and 7 were deprived of stage 4 sleep. Both groups were then deprived of total sleep for 1 night and then allowed 2 nights of uninterrupted recovery sleep. Compared to baseline nights, on the first recovery night the number of body movements was significantly reduced in all sleep stages and for total sleep. On the second recovery night, the number of movements was back to baseline level. The increased amount of slow-wave sleep (stages 3 and 4) during recovery sleep was not the primary reason for the reduced body motility.     

Leptin and hunger levels in young healthy adults after one night of sleep loss

Short‐term sleep curtailment associated with activation of the stress system in healthy, young adults has been shown to be associated with decreased leptin levels, impaired insulin sensitivity, and increased hunger and appetite. To assess the effects of one night of sleep loss in a less stressful environment on hunger, leptin, adiponectin, cortisol and blood pressure/heart rate, and whether a 2‐h mid‐afternoon nap reverses the changes associated with sleep loss, 21 young healthy individuals (10 men, 11 women) participated in a 7‐day sleep deprivation experiment (four consecutive nights followed by one night of sleep loss and two recovery nights). Half of the subjects were randomly assigned to take a mid‐afternoon nap (14:00–16:00 hours) the day following the night of total sleep loss. Serial 24‐h blood sampling and hunger scales were completed on the fourth (predeprivation) and sixth day (postdeprivation). Leptin levels were significantly increased after one night of total sleep loss, whereas adiponectin, cortisol levels, blood pressure/heart rate, and hunger were not affected. Daytime napping did not influence the effects of sleep loss on leptin, adiponectin, or hunger. Acute sleep loss, in a less stressful environment, influences leptin levels in an opposite manner from that of short‐term sleep curtailment associated with activation of the stress system. It appears that sleep loss associated with activation of the stress system but not sleep loss per se may lead to increased hunger and appetite and hormonal changes, which ultimately may lead to increased consumption of ‘comfort’ food and obesity.     

Recovery of Performance During Sleep Following Sleep Deprivation

Very few studies have systematically examined recovery of performance after sleep deprivation. In the present study, 12 young adult males were sleep deprived for periods of 40 and 64 hrs. Each period was preceded by baseline nights of sleep and followed by two recovery nights of sleep. Immediate recall and reaction time were tested at 2300, 0145, 0400, 0615, and 0830 during baseline, deprivation, and recovery nights. Performance efficiency showed a progressive decline after 2 hrs of recovery sleep following both periods of deprivation. Return to baseline was apparent after 4 hrs of steep following 40 hrs awake and after 8 hrs of sleep following 64 hrs awake. These results suggested that, in terms of behavioral efficiency, an equal amount of sleep is not required to compensate for sleep lost.     

Exercise and Sleep Loss: Effects on Recovery Sleep

The effects of exercise and sleep loss on recovery sleep were studied in young male naval volunteers. For 1 hr out of every 4 hrs during a 40-hr period, 20 subjects rested in bed and 10 subjects bicycled. Eleven measures of recovery night sleep were selected for comparison of the bedrest and exercise groups. Only one reached significance under the conservative Dunn-Bonferroni criterion: the exercise group had a higher percent total sleep time. The results indicate that exercise does increase the effects of sleep loss on recovery sleep, but that there is no simple, direct effect on specific sleep stages.     

Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Memory and Sleep Latencies in Connection with Repeated Awakenings From Sleep

Twelve subjects were kept awake 64 hrs. During baseline and recovery sleep, subjects were given a simple memory task. The subjects were awakened 3 times each night during slow-wave sleep and shown 4 playing cards. Approximately 90 min later the subjects were again awakened and tested for retention of the previous cards and given 4 new cards to learn. This procedure was repeated 3 times each night and upon awakening the following morning. On the recovery night recall was reduced, slow-wave sleep was lengthened, sleep latency was shortened, and body motility was reduced. It was suggested that the reason for the poorer recall was deeper sleep induced by the sleep deprivation.     

Effects of sleep deprivation on spontaneous arousals in humans

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The hierarchical definition of arousals from sleep includes a range of physiologic responses including microarousals, delta and K-complex bursts, and variations in autonomic system. Whether patterns in slow-wave electroencephalographic activity and autonomic activation are primary forms of arousal response can be addressed by studying effects of total sleep deprivation. We therefore examined changes in arousal density during recovery sleep in healthy subjects. DESIGN: Participants spent 6 consecutive 24-hour periods in the laboratory. Nights 1 and 2 were baseline nights followed by 64-hour total sleep deprivation, then 2 consecutive recovery nights. SETTING: Sleep-deprivation protocol was conducted under laboratory conditions with continuous behavioral and electrophysiologic monitoring. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve drug-free men aged 27.4 +/- 7.9 years were studied. None reported sleepiness or altered sleep-wake cycle, and none had neurologic, psychiatric or sleep disorders. INTERVENTION: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Arousals were classified into 4 levels: microarousals, phases of transitory activation, and delta and K-complex bursts. Sleep deprivation induced changes in the density of considered arousals except phases of transitory activation, with a distinct pattern among the different types. The greatest change was found for microarousals, which showed a significant decrease in the first recovery night (P = .01), with return to baseline thereafter. A fall in K-complex and delta-burst density was noted in the first recovery night, not, however, reaching statistical significance. The phases of transitory activation rate were virtually unaffected throughout the experimental nights. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that homeostatic sleep processes exert an inhibitory effect on arousal response from sleep with a significant effect only on the microarousal density. Decreased delta and K-complex burst rates, though not significant, support the hypothesis that they may be activating processes, probably modulated by factors independent from those implicated in cortical arousal.     

Neurobehavioral Dynamics Following Chronic Sleep Restriction: Dose-Response Effects of One Night for Recovery

Objective:

Establish the dose-response relationship between increasing sleep durations in a single night and recovery of neurobehavioral functions following chronic sleep restriction.

Design:

Intent-to-treat design in which subjects were randomized to 1 of 6 recovery sleep doses (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 h TIB) for 1 night following 5 nights of sleep restriction to 4 h TIB.

Setting:

Twelve consecutive days in a controlled laboratory environment.

Participants:

N = 159 healthy adults (aged 22-45 y), median = 29 y).

Interventions:

Following a week of home monitoring with actigraphy and 2 baseline nights of 10 h TIB, subjects were randomized to either sleep restriction to 4 h TIB per night for 5 nights followed by randomization to 1 of 6 nocturnal acute recovery sleep conditions (N = 142), or to a control condition involving 10 h TIB on all nights (N = 17).

Measurements and Results:

Primary neurobehavioral outcomes included lapses on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT), subjective sleepiness from the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), and physiological sleepiness from a modified Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). Secondary outcomes included psychomotor and cognitive speed as measured by PVT fastest RTs and number correct on the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), respectively, and subjective fatigue from the Profile of Mood States (POMS). The dynamics of neurobehavioral outcomes following acute recovery sleep were statistically modeled across the 0 h-10 h recovery sleep doses. While TST, stage 2, REM sleep and NREM slow wave energy (SWE) increased linearly across recovery sleep doses, best-fitting neurobehavioral recovery functions were exponential across recovery sleep doses for PVT and KSS outcomes, and linear for the MWT. Analyses based on return to baseline and on estimated intersection with control condition means revealed recovery was incomplete at the 10 h TIB (8.96 h TST) for PVT performance, KSS sleepiness, and POMS fatigue. Both TST and SWE were elevated above baseline at the maximum recovery dose of 10 h TIB.

Conclusions:

Neurobehavioral deficits induced by 5 nights of sleep restricted to 4 h improved monotonically as acute recovery sleep dose increased, but some deficits remained after 10 h TIB for recovery. Complete recovery from such sleep restriction may require a longer sleep period during 1 night, and/or multiple nights of recovery sleep. It appears that acute recovery from chronic sleep restriction occurs as a result of elevated sleep pressure evident in both increased SWE and TST.

Citation:

Banks S; Van Dongen HPA; Maislin G; Dinges DF. Neurobehavioral dynamics following chronic sleep restriction: dose-response effects of one night for recovery. SLEEP 2010;33(8):1013–1026.