Interactions between oxcarbazepine and conventional antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test in mice: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the types of interactions between oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) and conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) against maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES test) in mice, by using a method of isobolographic analysis. METHODS: Adverse effects of combinations were evaluated in the chimney test (motor performance), also using the isobolographic method, which allowed determination of the median toxic dose (TD50) values for individual combinations; thus the protective indices could be determined. RESULTS: OCBZ and phenytoin (PHT) at the fixed-ratio combination of 1:1 were significantly infraadditive (antagonistic) with respect to the antiseizure protection against MES and simultaneously additive in terms of side effects in the chimney test. Interestingly, combinations between OCBZ and clonazepam (CZP) in the MES test proved antagonistic or synergistic, depending on the proportion of both AEDs in the mixture. Low doses of OCBZ with high doses of CZP exerted antagonism. Conversely, high doses of OCBZ combined with low doses of CZP resulted in a synergistic interaction. Remaining combinations between OCBZ and phenobarbital, valproate, or carbamazepine were purely additive, either as regards the anticonvulsant activity against MES or in terms of motor impairment in the chimney test. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that interaction of OCBZ and CZP at fixed-ratio combination of 1:1 might be profitable from a clinical point of view. Conversely, combinations of OCBZ with PHT may not be clinically efficient.     

Preclinical profile of combinations of some second-generation antiepileptic drugs: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE: The need for an efficacious treatment of patients with intractable seizures is urgent and pressing, because approximately 30% of epilepsy patients worldwide are still inadequately medicated with current frontline antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study sought to determine the interactions among some newer AEDs [topiramate (TPM), felbamate (FBM), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and lamotrigine (LTG)] in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) and chimney test (motor performance) in mice, by using the isobolographic analysis. METHODS: Evaluation of the anticonvulsant and acute adverse (neurotoxic) effects in mice produced by the AEDs in combinations at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 allowed the assessment of their preclinical profile and the determination of benefit indices (BIs) for all individual combinations. RESULTS: Combinations of TPM+FBM at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 offered supraadditive (synergistic) interactions against electroconvulsions and subadditivity (antagonism) in terms of acute neurotoxic effects in the chimney test (BIs ranged between 1.90 and 2.59, the best combinations from a preclinical point of view). The examined combinations of TPM+OXC also were advantageous due to synergistic interactions in the MES, and additivity in terms of acute neurotoxic effects produced by the AEDs (BIs ranged between 1.35 and 1.71). In contrast, OXC+FBM exerted subadditive (antagonistic) interactions in the MES test and additive interactions in terms of acute motor impairment of animals (BIs ranged between 0.53 and 0.71). The worst combination was observed for OXC+LTG, at the fixed ratio of 1:1, displaying subadditivity (antagonism) against electroconvulsions and supraadditivity (synergy) with respect to neurotoxicity (BIs, 0.43). The remaining combinations of OXC+LTG tested (i.e., 1:3 and 3:1) exerted additivity in the MES test and supraadditivity in the chimney test (BIs 0.54 and 0.49, respectively). None of the studied AEDs affected the brain concentrations of other AEDs, so the existence of any pharmacokinetic interactions to be responsible for the observed effects is improbable. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current preclinical data, the pharmacological profile of combinations of TPM+FBM and TPM+OXC evaluated with isobolography was beneficial and might be worth recommendation to further clinical practice. In contrast, utmost caution is required during the use of OXC+FBM or OXC+LTG in clinical practice, because of the high risk of neurotoxic adverse effect appearance.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characterization of interactions between levetiracetam and numerous antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE: Approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy do not experience satisfactory seizure control with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy and often require polytherapy. The potential usefulness of AED combinations, in terms of efficacy and adverse effects, is therefore of major importance. The present study sought to identify potentially useful AED combinations with levetiracetam (LEV) METHODS: With isobolographic analysis, the mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model was investigated with regard to the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, phenobarbital (PB), valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC), administered singly and in combination with LEV. Acute adverse effects were ascertained by use of the chimney test evaluating motor performance and the step-through passive-avoidance task assessing long-term memory. Brain AED concentrations were determined to ascertain any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed antiseizure effect. RESULTS: LEV in combination with TPM, at the fixed ratios of 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1, was supraadditive (synergistic) in the MES test. Likewise, the combination of LEV with CBZ (at the fixed ratio of 16:1) and LEV with OXC (8:1 and 16:1) were supraadditive. In contrast, all other LEV/AED combinations displayed additivity. Furthermore, none of the investigated LEV/AED combinations altered motor performance and long-term memory. LEV brain concentrations were unaffected by concomitant AED administration, and LEV had no significant effect on brain concentrations of concomitant AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: These preclinical data would suggest that LEV in combination with TPM is associated with beneficial anticonvulsant pharmacodynamic interactions. Similar, but less profound effects were seen with OXC and CBZ.     

Effect of gabapentin on the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs against electroconvulsions in mice: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was the isobolographic evaluation of the interactions between the novel antiepileptic drug (AED) gabapentin (GBP) and a number of other AEDs against electroconvulsion-induced convulsions in mice. METHODS: Electroconvulsions were produced by means of an alternating current (ear-clip electrodes, 0.2-s stimulus duration, tonic hindlimb extension taken as the end point). Adverse effects were evaluated with the chimney test (motor performance) and passive-avoidance task (long-term memory). Plasma levels of AEDs were measured by immunofluorescence or high-pressure liquid chromatography. RESULTS: GBP (< or =50 mg/kg) remained ineffective on the electroconvulsive threshold. According to the isobolographic analysis, GBP appears to act synergistically with carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin, phenobarbital (PB), lamotrigine (LTG), and LY 300164. The pharmacokinetic events may be responsible for the interactions of GBP/PB and GBP/LTG, because only PB and LTG significantly elevated the plasma concentration of this AED. Conversely, GBP did not affect the plasma levels of other AEDs used in this study. No adverse effects were induced by combinations of GBP with these AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: The isobolographic analysis revealed that combinations of GBP with other AEDs generally results in synergistic (supraadditive) interactions.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction studies of loreclezole with felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model

PURPOSE: The study investigated the types of interactions between loreclezole (LCZ) and a variety of newly licensed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with different mechanisms of actions [felbamate (FBM), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC)] by isobolographic analysis. METHODS: Anticonvulsant and adverse-effect profiles of combinations of LCZ with other AEDs at fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 were investigated in the maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures and the chimney test (as a measure of motor impairment) in mice so as to identify optimal combinations. Protective indices (PIs) and benefit indices (BIs) were calculated so that a ranking in relation to advantageous combinations could be established. RESULTS: With isobolography, it was observed that the combination of LCZ and TPM, at the fixed ratios of 1:1 and 3:1, was supraadditive (synergistic; p < 0.05), whereas LCZ with TPM at the fixed ratio of 1:3 and LCZ combined with LTG, FBM, or OXC at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 were associated with additive interactions. Moreover, the isobolographic analysis in the chimney test revealed that only one combination tested (LCZ and TPM at the fixed ratio of 1:1) was subadditive (antagonistic; p < 0.05), whereas the remaining combinations of LCZ with LTG, FBM, or OXC (at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) barely displayed additivity. However, these combinations were associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions, in that LCZ increased brain TPM (94%), OXC (21%), FBM (46%), and LTG (8%) concentrations. In addition, brain LCZ concentrations were decreased by TPM (26%), OXC (37%), LTG (42%), and FBM (19%). None of the examined combinations between LCZ and TPM, OXC, LTG, and FBM altered long-term memory in the step-through passive-avoidance task. CONCLUSIONS: LCZ plus TPM appears to be a particularly favorable combination, based on the MES test and the chimney test. LCZ and OXC also is a favorable combination. However, these conclusions are confounded by the fact that LCZ is associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions.     

Pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic characteristics of interactions between loreclezole and four conventional antiepileptic drugs in pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in mice: an isobolographic analysis

Isobolographic analysis was used to characterize the interactions between loreclezole (LCZ) and clonazepam (CZP), ethosuximide (ETS), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA) in suppressing pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizures and in producing acute neurotoxic adverse effects in the chimney test in mice so as to identify optimum combinations. Moreover, protective indices (PIs) and benefit indices (BIs) were calculated so that a ranking in relation to advantageous combination could be established. Any pharmacokinetic contribution was ascertained by measurement of brain antiepileptic drug (AED) concentrations. All AED combinations comprising LCZ and CZP, ETS, PB, and VPA (at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) were additive in their seizure suppression. However, these interactions were complicated by changes in brain AED concentrations consequent to pharmacokinetic interactions. Thus, LCZ significantly increased total brain ETS concentrations (VPA, CZP, and PB concentrations were unaffected), and ETS decreased, and VPA increased, total brain LCZ concentrations. Only combinations of LCZ with CZP and PB were completely free of any pharmacokinetic interaction. Furthermore, in the chimney test, isobolographic analysis showed that the combination of LCZ and CZP, at the fixed ratio of 1:1, was supra-additive (synergistic, P<0.05), whereas LCZ and ETS at fixed ratios of 1:3 and 1:1 were subadditive (antagonistic, P<0.05). The remaining combinations of LCZ with CZP (1:3 and 3:1), ETS (3:1), PB (all fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1), and VPA (at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) barely displayed additivity. In conclusion, BI, which is a measure of the margin of safety and tolerability of drugs in combination and comprises anticonvulsant and neurotoxic measures, was favorable for only one combination (LCZ and ETS at a fixed ratio of 1:3) with a value of 1.39. In contrast, LCZ and CZP constitute an unfavorable combination (BI=0.61-1.01). The combinations of LCZ with PB or VPA do not offer any advantage as assessed by the parameters (BI range: 0.75-0.91) used in this study. However, these conclusions are confounded by the fact that LCZ is associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions.     

Interactions between tiagabine and conventional antiepileptic drugs in the rat model of complex partial seizures

This study evaluated the interactions between tiagabine (TGB) and three conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): valproate (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ), and phenobarbital (PB) in amygdala-kindled rats, a reliable model of complex partial seizures in humans. Isobolographic analysis of interactions revealed that TGB interacted additively with all tested conventional AEDs for the fixed-ratio combinations of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between AEDs revealed that the observed additivity was pharmacodynamic in nature. TGB did not affect the plasma and brain concentrations of VPA, CBZ and PB. Similarly, none of the studied conventional AEDs changed the plasma or brain levels of TGB. Also, TGB, VPA, CBZ, and PB administered alone (at their median effective doses) and in combinations at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 did not impair motor performance evaluated in the chimney test. In conclusion, additivity between TGB and conventional AEDs in amygdala-kindled rats and lack of bidirectional pharmacokinetic interactions suggest that TGB appears to be a valuable drug for an add-on therapy of refractory complex partial seizures in humans.     

传统抗癫痫药物和妥泰对成年癫痫患者生活质量的影响

目的 评价传统抗癫痫药物和妥泰对成年癫痫患者生活质量的影响。方法 102例临床新确诊的成年癫痫患者被随机分为两组：一组予以传统抗癫痫药物单药系统治疗(AEDs组)，另一组予以妥泰单药治疗(TPM组)。1个月后比较两组的发作频率和不良反应。并用QOLIE-30表对这102例癫痫患者进行生活质量评定。结果 TPM组的发作频率和不良反应均明显低于AEDs组，而生活质量总分明显高于AEDs组，尤其在前五项的评分中更加明显。结论 TPM能提高癫痫患者的生活质量，其改善生活质量的作用主要是通过控制发作和减轻不良反应实现的。     

Levetiracetam and felbamate interact both pharmacodynamically and pharmacokinetically: an isobolographic analysis in the mouse maximal electroshock model

PURPOSE: Polytherapy with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is generally required for approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy, who do not respond satisfactorily to monotherapy. The potential usefulness of AED combinations, producing synergistic anticonvulsant efficacy and minimal adverse effects, is therefore of significant importance. The present study sought to ascertain the potential usefulness of levetiracetam (LEV) and felbamate (FBM) in combination in the mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model. METHODS: The anticonvulsant interaction profile between LEV and FBM in the mouse MES-induced seizure model was determined using type II isobolographic analysis. Acute adverse effects (motor performance) were ascertained by use of the chimney test. LEV and FBM brain concentrations were measured by HPLC in order to determine any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed antiseizure effect. RESULTS: LEV in combination with FBM, at the fixed ratios of 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1, were supraadditive, whereas at the fixed ratio of 1:4, additivity was observed in the mouse MES model. Furthermore, none of the investigated combinations altered motor performance in the chimney test. Brain FBM concentrations were unaffected by concomitant LEV administration. In contrast, FBM significantly increased LEV brain concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: LEV in combination with FBM was associated with pharmacodynamic supraadditivity in the MES test. However, this anticonvulsant supraadditivity was associated with a concurrent increase in brain LEV concentrations indicating a pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed pharmacodynamic interaction between LEV and FBM.     

Amiloride enhances the anticonvulsant action of various antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model

Accumulating evidence indicates that amiloride (a potassium-sparing diuretic) exerts the anticonvulsant action in various in vivo and in vitro experiments. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the influence of amiloride on the protective action of numerous conventional and second-generation antiepileptic drugs [AEDs: carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), topiramate (TPM), and valproate (VPA)] against maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures in mice. Results indicate that amiloride [up to 100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.), at 30, 60, and 120 min before the test] neither altered the threshold for electroconvulsions, nor protected the animals against MES-induced seizures in mice. Moreover, amiloride (75 and 100 mg/kg, i.p., 120 min prior to the test) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant effects of all studied AEDs, except for LTG, by reducing their ED₅₀ values in the MES test. In contrast, amiloride at 50 mg/kg (i.p.) had no significant effect on the antielectroshock action of the tested AEDs in mice. Estimation of total brain AED concentrations revealed that amiloride (75 mg/kg) significantly increased total brain concentrations of CBZ, OXC, and PB, but not those of LTG, TPM, and VPA in mice. In conclusion, one can ascertain that the potentiation of the antiseizure action of TPM and VPA by amiloride in the MES test and lack of any pharmacokinetic interactions between drugs, make the combinations of amiloride with TPM and VPA of pivotal importance for epileptic patients.     

Central nervous system adverse effects of new antiepileptic drugs: A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies

OBJECTIVE: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the most frequent treatment-emergent central nervous system adverse events (CNS AEs) of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) from double-blind, add-on, placebo-controlled studies conducted in adult epileptic patients and identification of dose-adverse effect relationships. METHODS: Trial reports found by searching Medline and journals. Outcome was the number of patients complaining of treatment-emergent CNS AEs. Sixteen predefined CNS AEs were considered. Risk differences (RDs) were calculated for individual studies and summary statistics estimated using the random effect model. Predefined CNS AEs in patients treated with active drug (broken down into dose levels) or placebo were extracted and the RDs (95% CI) for CNS AEs were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-six suitable studies identified. No meta-analysis was possible for oxcarbazepine and tiagabine (only one study each included). For these drugs RDs were calculated from single studies. Gabapentin was significantly associated with somnolence 0.13 (0.06-0.2) and dizziness 0.11 (0.07-0.15); lamotrigine with dizziness 0.11 (0.05-0.17), ataxia 0.12 (0.01-0.24) and diplopia 0.12 (0.00-0.24); levetiracetam with somnolence 0.06 (0.01-0.11); pregabalin with somnolence 0.11 (0.07-0.15), dizziness 0.22 (0.16-0.28), ataxia 0.10 (0.06-0.14) and fatigue 0.04 (0.01-0.08); topiramate with somnolence 0.09 (0.04-0.14), dizziness 0.06 (0.00-0.11), cognitive impairment 0.14 (0.06-0.22) and fatigue 0.06 (0.01-0.12); zonisamide with somnolence 0.06 (0.02-0.11) and dizziness 0.06 (0.00-0.12). The dose-response relationship was analysed only for those CNS AEs significantly associated with the AED. CONCLUSIONS: No comparison between drugs was possible. One CNS AE was significantly more frequent for levetiracetam, two for zonisamide and gabapentin, three for lamotrigine and four for pregabalin and topiramate.     

Compulsory generic switching of antiepileptic drugs: high switchback rates to branded compounds compared with other drug classes

PURPOSE: Compulsory generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may lead to adverse effects in epilepsy patients because of seizure recurrence or increased toxicity. The study objectives were (a) to quantify and compare the switchback rates from generic to brand-name AEDs versus non-AEDs, and (b) to assess clinical implications of switching from branded Lamictal to generic lamotrigine (LTG) and whether signals exist suggesting outcome worsening. METHODS: By using a public-payer pharmacy-claims database from Ontario, Canada, switchback rates from generic to branded AEDs [Lamictal, Frisium (clobazam; CLB), and Depakene (VPA; divalproex)] were calculated and compared with non-AED long-term therapies, antihyperlipidemics and antidepressants, in January 2002 through March 2006. We then assessed pharmacy utilization and AED dosage among LTG patients switching back to branded Lamictal compared with those staying on generic formulation. RESULTS: The 1,354 patients (403 monotherapy, 951 polytherapy) were prescribed generic LTG, of whom 12.9% switched back to Lamictal (11.7% monotherapy, 13.4% polytherapy). Switchback rates of other AEDs were approximately 20% for CLB and VPA. The switchback rates for AEDs were substantially higher than for non-AEDs (1.5-2.9%). Significant increases in LTG doses were observed after generic substitution for those who did not switch back (6.2%; p<0.0001). The average number of codispensed AEDs and non-AED drugs significantly increased (p<0.0001) after LTG generic entry, especially in the generic group. CONCLUSIONS: These results reflect poor acceptance of switching AEDs to generic compounds. They may also indicate increased toxicity and/or loss of seizure control associated with generic AED use.     

The influence of L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, upon the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock in mice

Summary. N^G-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, an unspecific nitric oxide synthase inhibitor), applied at 1 and 40 mg/kg, did not influence the electroconvulsive threshold, but impaired the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (at 40 mg/kg) and phenobarbital (at 1 and 40 mg/kg). No effect was observed in the case of carbamazepine and diphenylhydantoin. The effect of L-NAME upon the protective activity of phenobarbital was not reversed by L-arginine (500 mg/kg), a source of endogenous nitric oxide. Moreover, this nitric oxide synthase inhibitor did not alter the plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs studied, so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable. L-NAME per se (40 mg/kg) caused a moderate motor impairment but did not affect long-term memory. The combined treatment of L-NAME and antiepileptic drugs (providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock) resulted in motor disturbances. On the other hand, mice performed the memory task better upon combined treatment of antiepileptic drugs with L-NAME compared to antiepileptic drugs alone. A 4-day administration of L-NAME, similarly to acute injections, decreased the protective action of phenobarbital but not that of diphenylhydantoin. The results indicate that L-NAME is able to reduce the protective activity of some conventional antiepileptics and this effect may be not associated with impaired synthesis of nitric oxide. Accepted November 19, 1997 / Received July 15, 1997     

Use of chronic epilepsy models in antiepileptic drug discovery: the effect of topiramate on spontaneous motor seizures in rats with kainate-induced epilepsy

Summary:  Purpose: Potential antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are typically screened on acute seizures in normal animals, such as those induced in the maximal electroshock and pentylenetet-razole models. As a proof-of-principle test, the present experiments used spontaneous epileptic seizures in kainate-treated rats to examine the efficacy of topiramate (TPM) with a repeated-measures, crossover protocol.
Methods: Kainic acid was administered in repeated low doses (5 mg/kg) every hour until each Sprague–Dawley rat experienced convulsive status epilepticus for >3 h. Six 1-month trials (n = 6–10 rats) assessed the effects of 0.3–100 mg/kg TPM on spontaneous seizures. Each trial involved six pairs of TPM and saline-control treatments administered as intraperitoneal injections on alternate days with a recovery day between each treatment day. Data analysis included a log transformation to compensate for the asymmetric distribution of values and the heterogeneous variances, which appeared to arise from clustering of seizures.
Results: A significant effect of TPM was observed for 12 h (i.e., two 6-h periods) after a 30-mg/kg injection, and full recovery from the drug effect was complete within 43 h. TPM exerted a significant effect at doses of 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg, and the effects of TPM (0.3–100 mg/kg) were dose dependent.
Conclusions: These data suggest that animal models with spontaneous seizures, such as kainate- and pilocarpine-treated rats, can be used efficiently for rapid testing of AEDs with a repeated-measures, crossover protocol. Furthermore, the results indicate that this design allows both dose–effect and time-course-of-recovery studies.     

Low propensity of conventional antiepileptic drugs for interaction with felbamate against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

Summary. The objective of this study was to evaluate an interaction of the novel antiepileptic drug felbamate (2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate) with conventional antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. Electroconvulsions were produced by means of an alternating current (ear-clip electrodes, 0.2-s stimulus duration, tonic hindlimb extension taken as the endpoint). Adverse effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Brain and plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs were measured by immunofluorescence. Felbamate (7.5–30 mg/kg) significantly increased the electroconvulsive threshold. Felbamate at the subprotective dose of 5 mg/kg did not affect the anticonvulsive action of antiepileptics studied. On the other hand, this drug used at the lowest protective dose of 7.5 mg/kg remained without effect upon the activity of valproate, carbamazepine or phenobarbital, but significantly potentiated the protective potential of diphenylhydantoin. No adverse effects were observed with combinations of felbamate with these antiepileptics. Neither brain nor free plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs were changed by felbamate. The results indicate that the combination of felbamate with conventional antiepileptic drugs is not promising from the experimental point of view. Received March 3, 1999; accepted September 28, 1999     

Isobolographic characterization of interactions of levetiracetam with the various antiepileptic drugs in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model

The aim of this study was to characterize the anticonvulsant effects of levetiracetam (LEV) in combination with the various antiepileptic drugs (clonazepam [CZP], oxcarbazepine [OXC], phenobarbital [PB], tiagabine [TGB], and valproate [VPA]), in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model.Limbic (psychomotor) seizure activity was evoked in albino Swiss mice by a current (32 mA, 6 Hz, 3 s stimulus duration) delivered via ocular electrodes and isobolographic analysis for parallel and non-parallel dose–response effects was used to characterize the consequent anticonvulsant interactions between the various drug combinations. Potential concurrent adverse-effect profiles of interactions between LEV and CZP, OXC, PB, TGB, and VPA at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 were evaluated in the chimney (motor performance), passive avoidance (long-term memory), and grip-strength (muscular strength) tests.LEV administered singly was associated with a dose–response relationship curve (DRRC) that was parallel to that for CZP and non-parallel to that for OXC, PB, TGB and VPA. With isobolography for parallel DRRCs, the combination of LEV with CZP at three fixed-ratios of 1:3, 1:1 and 3:1 was additive in nature. With isobolography for non-parallel DRRCs the combinations of LEV with OXC, TGB and VPA at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 were also additive. In contrast, the isobolography for non-parallel DRRCs revealed that the interaction for the combination of LEV with PB at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 was supra-additive (synergistic). None of the combinations were associated with any concurrent adverse effects with regards to motor coordination, long-term memory or muscular strength.LEV is associated with favorable anticonvulsant synergism with PB and is additive with regards to CZP, OXC, TGB and VPA in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model.     

Isobolographic and subthreshold analysis of interactions among felbamate and four conventional antiepileptic drugs in pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in mice

PURPOSE: Despite possibility of idiosyncratic reaction development, felbamate (FBM) is recommended in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and partial refractory epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of interactions between FBM and four conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): clonazepam (CZP), ethosuximide (ESM), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA), in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced convulsions in mice, a model of myoclonic seizures in humans. METHODS: Data obtained from PTZ-evoked seizures were compared by use of two basic procedures, the subthreshold method and isobolographic analysis. Results of the chimney test (evaluating motor coordination) also were elaborated isobolographically. Thus it was possible to determine both median toxic dose (TD50) and protective index (PI) for each drug combination. RESULTS: FBM reduced the clonic seizure activity [with an ED50 of 9.7 mg/kg; TD50, 439.1 mg/kg; and PI, 45.3]. FBM at the dose of 10 mg/kg, but not 7.5 mg/kg, significantly reduced PTZ-induced convulsions in mice. In the subthreshold method, FBM (7.5 mg/kg) did not affect the protective activity of conventional AEDs used in the study. However, when applied at 10 mg/kg, it enhanced the protective activity of PB and ESM, but not that of VPA or CZP. The nature of these interactions could not be precisely estimated with this method. The exact profile of drug interactions was determined with the use of isobolography. In terms of seizure inhibition, antagonism was found between FBM and VPA applied at the fixed-dose ratio of 3:1. Synergy was detected between FBM and PB (1:3). Combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3, 1:1), PB (1:1, 3:1), and ESM or CZP (1:3, 1:1, 3:1) led to additive interactions. As regards motor impairment, the combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) were synergistic. Remaining combinations exhibited pure additivity. Pharmacokinetic events may influence FBM/ESM and FBM/CZP interactions, because FBM lowered the brain concentration of ESM and increased that of CZP. CONCLUSIONS: The profitable benefit index was found only for the combination of FBM with PB (1:3). Conversely, the combinations of FBM with either VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) do not seem promising for the therapy of refractory myoclonic convulsions. Isobolographic analysis provides more reliable clues to be considered by the clinicians willing to introduce AED combinations for the therapy of epilepsy.     

Effects of antiepileptic drugs on working memory as assessed by spatial alternation performance in rats

Patients with epilepsy can have impaired cognitive abilities. Many factors contribute to this impairment, including the adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). However, there are few systematic data on the effects of AEDs on specific cognitive domains, such as working memory. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of AEDs on working memory as measured by delayed spatial alternation behavior in nonepileptic rats. The GABA-related AEDs triazolam and phenobarbital significantly disrupted performance, whereas tiagabine, valproate, and gabapentin did not. The sodium channel blockers carbamazepine and topiramate produced modest but significant disruption of performance, whereas the effects of lamotrigine were not significant and phenytoin produced a modest but significant improvement in performance but at doses that abolished responding in some animals. Levetiracetam had no effect on working memory. In contrast, ethosuximide significantly disrupted working memory. The disruptions produced by triazolam and phenobarbital were similar in magnitude to the effects of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine. The present results indicate that AEDs can disrupt working memory, but there are differences among AEDs in the magnitude of the disruption that do not appear to be correlated with mechanism of action.