Use of the Oucher Numeric and the Word Graphic Scale in children aged 9–14 years with post‐operative pain

? The construct validity and clinical applicability of two self‐report scales, the Oucher Numeric and the Word Graphic Scales, were examined in this study. Construct validity was tested on the assumption that pain declines following the administration of analgesia. ? Eighty‐one children aged between nine and 14 years with post‐operative pain used the two scales before and for each of the 4 hours following the administration of analgesia, to report their intensity of pain. The method used for testing construct validity was a replication of the study conducted by 3 ; Children’s pain perception before and after analgesia: a study of instrument construct validity and related issues. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 3 (1), 11–23) to test the construct validity of the Oucher Scale. Construct validity was supported for both the scales. ? Twenty‐eight nurses who administered the scales and the parents of 45 children who had observed their children use the scales, commented on the usefulness of the scales in assessment of pain during hospitalization. ? A majority of children and nurses preferred the Oucher Numeric, whereas the Word Graphic Scale was preferred by a majority of the parents. ? Preference of scale was based on its ease of use and whether the child preferred to use numbers or words to describe the intensity of pain. ? A majority of the children and nurses and all parents believed that a self‐report scale was useful for assessment and communication of children’s pain following surgery.     

Development and validation of the Asian version of the oucher: a pain intensity scale for children.

The present study was designed to develop and test the validity of the Asian version of the Oucher pain intensity scale, with color photographs of Taiwanese children as the pain intensity cues. A series of 3 studies were conducted. The aim of the first study was to create male and female versions of the Asian Oucher poster. Each poster consisted of 6 color photographs of children's faces, ranging from "no hurt at all" (scored as 0) to the "biggest hurt you could ever have" (scored as 5). In the second study, 220 children aged 3 to 6 years were recruited to examine the content validity. Children who were able to complete a Piagetian seriation task were asked to choose the sequence of 6 photographs. Photo sequences were adjusted according to the study findings. The third study was conducted to examine the convergent, discriminate, and clinical validity for children who are at different levels of pain intensity. In total, 111 children aged 3 to 10 years old who were experiencing surgical pain were recruited. The construct validity of the Asian Oucher was supported. PERSPECTIVE: This study developed an Asian version of Oucher, with photographs of facial expressions of real Taiwanese children who were experiencing pain. The Asian Oucher can assess pain for children as young as 3 years old.     

Examining the validity,reliability, and preference of three pediatric pain measurement tools in African-American children

PURPOSE: To compare the validity, reliability, and preference of pain intensity measurement tools--the African-American Oucher Scale, the Wong-Baker FACES Scale, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)--in 100 African-American children between 3 and 18 years of age. METHODS: During a visit to the sickle cell anemia clinic, the children were asked to describe two painful procedures/treatments they had experienced and to choose which one hurt the most. They rated the pain intensity of each procedure/treatment on the three scales that were presented in a preselected order. After using all the scales, the children then chose their favorite scale. The same procedure was repeated at the end of the visit, with a minimum of 15 minutes between the test and retest. RESULTS: Concurrent validity was determined by comparing the rank order of the two identified painful items with the pain scores on the three scales. Chi square analysis indicated a statistically significant difference among the scales for preference (chi2 = 24.08, df = 2, p < 0.0001) and reliability (chi2 = 6.12, df = 2, p < 0.05), but not validity (chi2 = 0.81, df = 2, NS) for the entire sample. Most children preferred using the FACES Scale (56%) versus the Oucher (26%) and VAS (18%). When the data were analyzed for three cognitive stages (ages 3-7, 8-12, and 13-18 years), the following were found: For the school-age period, chi square for reliability did not reach significance (chi2 = 4.35, df = 2, NS); for the preschool-age period, chi square for validity did reach significance (chi2 = 6.49, df = 2, p < 0.05) and was strongest for the FACES scale, followed by the Oucher. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicated that the FACES and African-American Oucher Scales are valid and reliable tools for measuring pain in children. Among the entire sample and each age group, the FACES scale was the most preferred scale.     

French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain

OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the reliability and the construct validity of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. DESIGN: Reliability and validity study. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital and outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred one patients (mean age, 49 y). INTERVENTION: French translations were obtained by using the "translation-backward translation" method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impairment outcome measures (visual analog scale [VAS] pain, neck range of motion, morning stiffness, score of neck sensitivity, radiologic score of Kellgren) and patients' perceived handicap (VAS) were recorded at the baseline visit. Three functional disability scales (Neck Disability Index [NDI], Neck Pain and Disability Scale [NPDS], Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPQ]) were recorded twice, at baseline visit and 24 hours later. Reliability was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Test-retest was excellent for the NPDS and NDI (ICC =.91,.93, respectively) and good for the NPQ (ICC =.84). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. Expected convergent and divergent validity were observed only for the NPDS; 3 main factors were extracted by factor analysis and explained 78% of the cumulative variance. CONCLUSION: The 3 translated scales are valid, but the NPDS seems to have the best construct validity.     

Is the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale a Valid Tool for Assessing Pain Intensity in Children Below 8 Years of Age?

The verbal numerical rating scale (vNRS-11) is one of the most widely used scales for assessing pediatric pain intensity. The literature shows that it is a valid instrument for assessing pain intensity in children above 8 years of age. The aim of this work was to study whether the vNRS-11 is also a valid instrument when it is used with Catalan-speaking children between 6 and 8 years old. A total of 126 schoolchildren (mean age, 6.87; SD, .68) were interviewed individually. Participants reported the maximum intensity of the most frequent pain they had experienced in the previous 3 months, and the intensity they would experience in 3 circumstances, using the vNRS-11 and other widely used scales: the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), the mechanical visual analog scale (VAS), and the colored analog scale (CAS). They rated their affective state in relation to the pain experience and reported their pain-related disability. Participants also indicated which of the 4 scales they preferred. The vNRS-11 showed a high convergent construct validity (r = .73–.86), adequate discriminant validity (z = 2.05–5.55), and adequate criterion-related validity (r = .45–.70). The vNRS-11 was the second most preferred scale.PerspectiveThis study contributes to the increasing literature that supports the use of the vNRS-11 to assess pain intensity in children. Specifically, it shows that it can be used in children as young as 6 years of age.     

Pain assessment in the paediatric Emergency Department: whose view counts?

OBJECTIVES: To compare patient, guardian and professional assessment of acute pain in children presenting to an Emergency Department, and to examine whether there was a correlation between the scores obtained using the Faces and linear scales for each group. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study of 73 children aged 4-14 years attending a paediatric hospital Emergency Department between March and April 2002 with pain caused by an acute injury. The child's pain on admission, as estimated by the child, their guardian and a healthcare professional (nurse/doctor/emergency nurse practitioner) was recorded using a Faces scale and a linear scale. RESULTS: Professionals consistently score pain lower [median linear scale score 3.1; interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-5.3] than do patients (6.6; 4.9-7.4) or guardians (6.0; 3.9-7.1) using both linear and Faces scales. There is a significant correlation between pain scores obtained using the two scales for professionals [Spearman R value 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.93], guardians (0.83; 0.74-0.89) and patients (0.42; 0.21-0.59). CONCLUSION: Professionals score pain lower than do children or guardians. Similar pain scores are obtained using both a Faces and a linear scale. This study offers no support for the introduction of a uniform pain assessment tool in a paediatric Emergency Department setting.     

Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients.

This study examined the reliability and validity of the Roland scale (taken from the Sickness Impact Profile: SIP) as a measure of dysfunction among chronic pain patients. One hundred forty-four subjects completed the SIP when they were screened for admission to an inpatient pain management program. One hundred sixteen subjects were subsequently re-administered the SIP at admission to inpatient treatment. A 3-month post-treatment administration of the SIP was performed for 52 of these subjects. Roland scale scores were calculated from the SIP for each patient. Test-retest stability coefficients indicated that the SIP Roland scale was generally as reliable as the SIP Total, Physical, and Psychosocial scale scores. Consistent with previous research, correlational analyses indicated that the SIP Roland scale is strongly associated with the SIP Physical but not the SIP Psychosocial scale. The SIP Roland scale and the other SIP scales demonstrated similar sensitivity to changes associated with multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for chronic pain. Finally, the pattern of relationships between the SIP Roland scale and several pain-related measures supported the concurrent validity of the SIP Roland scale. The results of the analyses were very similar for patients presenting with and without low back pain. The study supports the reliability and validity of the SIP Roland scale items for assessing dysfunction of chronic pain patients with pain in sites other than the low back as well as those with low back pain.     

The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain

Purpose: The aims of this study were to translate the numeric rating scale (NRS) into Arabic and to evaluate the test–retest reliability and convergent validity of an Arabic Numeric Pain Rating Scale (ANPRS) for measuring pain in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Methods: The English version of the NRS was translated into Arabic as per the translation process guidelines for patient-rated outcome scales. One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with OA of the knee who had experienced pain for more than 6 months were asked to report their pain levels on the ANPRS, visual analogue scale (VAS), and verbal rating scale (VRS). A second assessment was performed 48 h after the first to assess test–retest reliability. The test–retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1). The convergent validity was assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficient. In addition, the minimum detectable change (MDC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were also assessed.

Results: The repeatability of ANPRS was good to excellent (ICC 0.89). The SEM and MDC were 0.71 and 1.96, respectively. Significant correlations were found with the VAS and VRS scores (p?<0.01).

Conclusions: The Arabic numeric pain rating scale is a valid and reliable scale for measuring pain levels in OA of the knee.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Arabic Numeric Pain Rating Scale (ANPRS) is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring pain in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, with psychometric properties in agreement with other widely used scales.

• The ANPRS is well correlated with the VAS and NRS scores in patients with OA of the knee.

• The ANPRS appears to measure pain intensity similar to the VAS, NRS, and VRS and may provide additional advantages to Arab populations, as Arabic numbers are easily understood by this population.

     

Psychometric properties of the Dutch Chronic Fatigue Syndrome--Activities and Participation Questionnaire (CFS-APQ)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome-Activities and Participation Questionnaire (CFS-APQ) is a recently developed disease-specific assessment tool for monitoring activity limitations and participation restrictions in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). In this study, the convergent validity, content validity, and test-retest reliability of data obtained with the Dutch-language version of the questionnaire were examined. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred eleven consecutive patients with CFS were enrolled, of whom 47 fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The subjects were first asked to rate their pain, fatigue, and ability to concentrate using 3 visual analog scales, to list at least 5 activities that had become difficult to perform due to their complaints, and to complete the CFS-APQ. Furthermore, subjects were asked to complete a modified version of the CFS-APQ at home and return it to the investigators. The content of the questionnaire was reviewed using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Impairments, Disability and Health (ICIDH) beta II draft. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (R) were used for the convergent validity analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients were computed for the assessment of the test-retest data. RESULTS: Overall scores on the CFS-APQ correlated with the scores from the visual analog scales for pain (R=.51, P<.001) and fatigue (R=.50, P<.001). The majority of the responses (157 out of 183 answers [85.8%]) to the request to "list difficult activities" matched the content of the CFS-APQ. Using the ICIDH beta II draft, 21 out of 26 questions were found to address activities, and the remaining 5 questions measured the participation level. The Cronbach alpha coefficient was.94, and intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability of the overall scores were >or= .95 (P<.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results substantiate the convergent validity, content validity, and reliability of the CFS-APQ scores for patients with CFS.     

The word-graphic rating scale as a measure of children's and adolescents' pain intensity

A program of studies was designed to select and test a pain intensity scale for inclusion in a multidimensional pain assessment tool for children and adolescents. The focus was on determining each scale's validity, reliability, ease of use, preference, and the lack of age, gender, and ethnic biases. Five pain scales were evaluated in four separate studies: a word-graphic rating scale, a visual analogue scale, a graded-graphic rating scale, a magnitude estimation scale (0 to 10), and a color scale. Subjects (N = 1,223) were 8 to 17 years of age and, in three of the studies, were hospitalized and judged to be in pain. In Study 1, well children used the scales to assess pain in an analogue situation selecting the color scale easiest to use and best liked. Convergent validity for the five scales was supported. In Study 2, hospitalized children, who were experiencing pain, overwhelmingly selected the word-graphic rating scale as their choice. A pilot version of a multidimensional pain assessment tool incorporating the word-graphic rating scale was tested in Study 3 using a repeated measures design. The scale demonstrated sensitivity to changes in postoperative pain intensity over time. In Study 4, convergent validity of the five scales and test-retest reliability of the word-graphic rating scale were supported. The series of four studies provides strong evidence to support use of the word-graphic rating scale to measure pain intensity in pediatric populations.     

Translation and construct validity of the Lequesne index for Arab speaking North African patients with osteoarthritis of the knee]

OBJECTIVE: To translate in Arabic and validate the Lequesne index for use in Tunisian. BACKGROUND: No instrument wording in Arabic language and validated in an Arab population to measure lower limb functional disability caused by OA. DESIGN: Arab translation was obtained using the "forward translation/backward translation" method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study. Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fulfilling the revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology were included. Impairment outcome measures (VAS pain; knee mobility; Kellgren's radiological score); disability (the maximum distance walked; WOMAC index) and Beck depression scale were recorded. Inter rater reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (convergent and divergent validities) and a factor analysis was performed. Internal consistency of each factor was assessed by Crohnbach alpha coefficient. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were included. All questions were acceptable and retained. Inter rater reliability was excellent with ICC = 0.91. The Bland and Altman method showed distribution of differences homogenous and no systematic trend. Expected divergent validity and convergent validity were observed, suggested good construct validity. Two main factors were extracted by factor analysis of the Lequesne, and explained more than 55% of the cumulative variance, the first factor represents disability and the second represents pain and stiffness. Crohnbach alpha coefficient was, respectively, 0.68 for factor 1 and 0.54 for factor 2. In conclusion, we translated and adapted the Lequesne index into Arabic to suit Tunisian people. Translated questionnaire is reliable and valid. Although the scale was validated in a Tunisian population, we expect that it can suit other Arab populations especially North Africans. Further studies are needed to confirm such hypothesis.     

The development of the DEGRR: A scale to assess pain in young children with cancer

The Gustave Roussy Child Pain Scale (Douleur Enfant Gustave Roussy, DEGR^RScale) is a scale for grading prolonged pain in children aged 2–6 years with cancer. The scale comprised six behaviours specific to pain items, five psychomotor inertia items, and four anxiety items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 60. This work was designed to confirm the scale structure and to study its construct validity and convergent validity. Our work was composed of two parts. In the first part of the study, 152 children with progressive cancer were scored by two nurses using the DEGR^Rscale, in a cross-sectional design. And in the second part, 53 of these 152 children were video-recorded. The tapes were assessed both by a panel of four pain specialists using a 0 to 7 Likert scale and by a nurse using DEGR^Rscale. As for the 152 children, the mean of the total scores derived from the DEGR^Ris 20.2 (SD = 6.2). Both the degree of agreement between the nurses (the weighted κ coefficient) and the internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.90) were high, providing evidence of good reliability. Multivariate factor analyses showed a first factor of intensity of pain (51% of the total variance) and a second factor (14% of the total variance) which distinguishes the psychomotor inertia items from the items concerning voluntary expression of pain. Also, the results showed that psychomotor inertia items contribute to both factors and that it is an important sign of prolonged pain. Construct validity was strengthened by the absence of correlation between DEGR^Rscores and variables not related to pain, including fever, neutropenia and anaemia (indicative of poor medical condition) and the absence of parents’ visits (indicative of psychological distress). Concerning the 53 video-recorded children, the nurses’ DEGR^Rratings were strongly correlated with the specialists panel scores indicating a fairly good case for convergent validity.     

EVENDOL, a new behavioral pain scale for children ages 0 to 7 years in the emergency department: design and validation

Numerous behavioral pain measures have been validated for young children, but none is appropriate to assess pain in emergency departments (EDs), where caregivers need a simple, easily completed scale. Our objective was to elaborate and validate a tool, relevant in any painful situation, with agitation or prostration, and for any age under 7 years. Five items (scored 0 to 3) were developed by pediatric pain and emergency caregivers. The new scale, called EVENDOL, was tested at children's arrival and after analgesics, at rest, and during mobilization. The validation study included 291 children from birth to 7 years old in 4 French EDs, and independent observations by the ED nurse and a researcher. The Cronbach coefficient was excellent (0.83 to 0.92). Construct validity was demonstrated by a decrease in scores after nalbuphine: 8.14 to 3.62 of 15 at rest (P<.0001), 11.87 to 6.65 at mobilization (P = .0011); by good correlations between EVENDOL and nurse or researcher numerical scores: 0.79 to 0.92 (P<.0001); by good correlations between children's self-assessment scores and EVENDOL in children ages 4 to 7 (0.64 to 0.93). Discriminant validity with tiredness, anxiety, and hunger was good. Interrater reliability was excellent between nurses and researcher (weighted kappa 0.7 to 0.9), and in a group of 6 nurses (simultaneous assessment of 122 videos). The treatment threshold was determined at 4 of 15. EVENDOL has excellent validity and can be used for all children under age 7 in EDs, for any age and any pain, acute as well as more prolonged.     

French translation and validation of a functional disability scale for neck pain]

OBJECTIVES: To translate and to assess the reliability and the construct validity of the French translation of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), an American functional disability scale for neck pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Non randomised prospective study, where patients with neck disorders were included. Impairment outcomes measures (VAS Pain, range of motion of neck, score of neck sensitivity, radiologic score of Kellgren) and patientsperceived handicap (VAS) were recorded at the baseline visit. Disability was assessed with the NPDS, that was recorded twice, at baseline visit and 24 hours later. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included. French versions were obtained using the "translation/backward translation" method. Expected convergent (r = 0.51 with VAS Pain, 0.63 with VAS Functional Disability, 0.67 with VAS Handicap) and divergent (r = 0.39 and 0.49 respectively for the anxiety and depression scores of HAD, palpation sensitivity r = 0.31, neck mobility r = - 0.45 and 0.28, and Kellgrens radiologic score r = 0.04) validity were observed, suggested good construct validity. Test-retest was excellent for NPDS with ICC = 0.91. The Bland and Altman method showed distribution of differences homogenous and no systematic trend. Three mains factors were extracted by factors analysis of the NPDS, and explained 78% of the cumulative variance. CONCLUSION: The French version of NPDS has good metrologic qualities. This scale can be used in clinical practice to assess disability in neck pain and to normalise disability assessment.     

The alternate forms reliability of the Oucher pain scale.

The purpose of this study was to determine the adequacy of the alternate forms reliability of three versions of the Oucher pain scale. Because the original large-sized posters were unwieldy for use by nurses with children in clinical settings, it became necessary to reduce it in size. To determine whether the resulting tools were psychometrically equivalent to the original versions of the Oucher, this study was undertaken. In a group of 3- to 12-year-old children who underwent surgical or dental procedures ( n = 137), scores were obtained after the procedure on small and large versions of the Oucher. The order of presentation of the two different Ouchers was randomized. Findings revealed that correlation coefficients between the scores provided for the small and large versions of the Oucher were strong, positive, and significant for the Caucasian, African-American, and Hispanic versions in 3- to 12-year-old children. These results provided evidence of the adequacy of the alternate forms reliability of these scales.     

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure

OBJECTIVE: To translate and validate the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure (Persian DASH). DESIGN: Cultural translation and psychometric testing. SETTING: Outpatient departments of orthopaedics surgery, primary care settings, rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and seventy-one consecutive Persian-speaking patients with upper extremity disorders including subacromial impingement syndrome, rotator cuff disease, epicondylitis, ulnar nerve entrapment, bursitis, instability, carpal tunnel syndrome, tenosynovitis and adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: The translation and cultural adaptation of the original questionnaire was carried out in accordance with published guidelines. The participants were asked to complete a questionnaire booklet including the Persian DASH, the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain. In addition, 31 randomly selected patients were asked to complete the questionnaire 48 hours later for the second time. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Persian DASH was 0.96. The Persian DASH showed excellent test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient equal to 0.82 (P<0.01). The correlation between the Persian DASH and the functional scales of the Iranian SF-36 showed desirable results indicating a good convergent validity (Pearson's coefficients ranged from -0.25 to -0.72; P<0.001). The correlation between the Persian DASH and the visual analogue scale was 0.52 (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Persian DASH is a reliable and valid instrument to measure functional status in Persian-speaking patients with upper extremity disorders in Iran. It is simple and easy to use and now can be applied in clinical settings and future outcome studies in Iran and other Persian-speaking communities.     

Measurement of dyspnea in patients treated with mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea, or difficult breathing, is common in patients receiving mechanical ventilation; however, dyspnea is not routinely or systematically measured. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this methodological study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of 5 dyspnea rating scales and the criterion validity of 4 dyspnea rating scales in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The secondary purpose was to examine the correlations between each of these 5 rating scales and physiological measures of respiratory function. METHODS: The convenience sample consisted of 28 patients on mechanical ventilation during their hospitalization in the intensive care units of a large, inner-city hospital. Patients rated their dyspnea twice at 30-minute intervals on the visual analogue scale, the vertical analogue dyspnea scale, the modified Borg scale, the numerical scale, and the faces scale. Test-retest reliability was computed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Criterion validity was evaluated by using the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The 5 rating scales had acceptable test-retest reliabilities, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.97. Criterion validity of the 4 scales also was acceptable, with Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients from 0.76 to 0.96. The rating scales were not correlated with most of the physiological variables. At least half of the patients reported moderate to severe dyspnea. CONCLUSION: The scales showed acceptable reliability and validity, and they will be useful in quantifying dyspnea experienced by patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Further work is needed to evaluate the extent and the severity of dyspnea in such patients in order to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.     

3种神经病理性疼痛筛查量表在中轴型脊柱关节炎患者中的评价

目的 比较3种神经病理性疼痛筛查量表在中轴型脊柱关节炎患者中的信度、效度和适用性。方法 采用painDETECT问卷、神经病理性疼痛4问卷和利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估疼痛量表对186例中轴型脊柱关节炎患者进行调查,评价量表的信度和效度。结果 painDETECT问卷、神经病理性疼痛4问卷和利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估疼痛量表的Cronbach α系数分别为0.807,0.697和0.623, Guttman分半系数分别为0.846、0.691和0.701。painDETECT问卷共提取2个公因子,累计方差贡献率55.171%。神经病理性疼痛4问卷共提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率66.627%。利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估疼痛量表共提取2个公因子,累计方差贡献率50.836%。3种量表评估结果一致性Kappa值和相关性r值均大于0.500。患者对3种量表首选率分别为71.5%、3.2%和14.0%。结论 painDETECT问卷信度和效度良好,首选率最高。其余2种量表信度尚可,效度良好。3种量表一致性与相关性较强。