Akute AC-Gelenksprengung – operative oder konservative Therapie?

42 patients with complete acromioclavicular dislocation treated operatively and 38 patients managed non-operatively were examined retrospectively with a mean follow-up of 6.3 +/- 2.5 years. The dislocations in both groups included type III and type V injuries according to the Rockwood-classification. The operative technique was suturing of the tom ligaments and stabilization of the acromioclavicular joint using resorbable coracoclavicular PDS-banding. In non-operative treatment, early physiotherapy accepting the deformity was performed in most of the patients. The clinical results using the UCLA- and the Constant-Murley score as well as evaluation of pain, function and strength were similar in both groups. Those patients suffering from a more severe dislocation type Rockwood V who were treated non-operatively had as good results as those patients with grade III dislocation. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis developed mainly in those patients whose acromioclavicular joint healed in partial dislocation. Non-operative treatment was equal even in less severe dislocations in the subgroup of type Rockwood V injuries. The persisting deformity which must be expected in non-operative treatment did not affect the patient's outcome regarding pain, function and strength of the shoulder.     

关节镜下喙锁和肩锁韧带重建治疗陈旧性Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位

目的探讨关节镜下喙锁+肩锁韧带重建治疗陈旧性Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位的疗效。 方法选取2016年1月至2020年12月北京大学人民医院收治的14例确诊为陈旧性肩锁关节脱位患者,其中男8例、女6例,平均年龄（37.2±10.1）岁,平均受伤时间（13.4±3.5）个月,累及优势侧肩关节7例,均行关节镜下喙锁+肩锁韧带重建手术。术后所有患者分别于不同时间点随访（术后1、3、6、12个月）,进行视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）和美国加州大学洛杉矶分校（University of California, Los Angeles,UCLA）评分。 结果14例确诊为陈旧性肩锁关节脱位患者（均为Rockwood III型）进入研究并完成手术,12例获得完全随访,平均随访（26.3±8.6）个月（12~36个月）。患者术前和术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月VAS评分分别为（5.667±0.414）分、（5.583±0.288）分、（4.583±0.229）分、（2.833±0.271）分、（0.538±0.193）分,与术前相比,所有患者在术后3个月、6个月和12个月随访时均显示疼痛减轻,术后6个月和12个月疼痛减轻的程度与术前相比（VAS评分变化）差异有统计学意义（P<0.001）。患者术前和术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月UCLA评分分别为（19.083±0.468）分、（18.583±0.434）分、（21.000±0.628）分、（25.750±0.579）分、（32.750±0.509）分,与术前相比,所有患者在术后3个月、6个月和12个月随访时UCLA评分与术前相比均有提高,术后6个月、12个月随访时UCLA评分改善的程度与术前相比,差异有统计学意义（P<0.001）。 结论关节镜下喙锁+肩锁韧带重建可以用较小的创伤达到帮助陈旧性肩锁关节脱位患者减轻疼痛和改善肩关节功能的目的。     

保守治疗与锁骨钩钢板内固定手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的中长期疗效对比研究

目的通过对比评估分析保守治疗与锁骨钩钢板内固定手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的中长期临床疗效,为临床上该类型肩锁关节脱位的治疗方式的选择提供依据。 方法回顾性分析自2015年9月至2016年9月在中山市中医院关节科诊治为Roockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的患者,入选72例,成功随访47例,采用锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗（钩钢板组）23例、采用保守治疗方法（保守治疗组）24例。随访观察比较两组术后（损伤后）1年、3年、5年视觉模拟评分法（visual analogu scale,VAS）、肩关节功能评分以及并发症发生率。 结果术后1年随访锁骨钩钢板组VAS评分稍优于保守治疗组,但两组差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;而术后3年以及5年锁骨钩钢板组VAS评分均明显优于保守治疗组,且差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后1年、3年以及5年随访锁骨钩钢板组肩关节功能评分均明显优于保守治疗组,且差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）;锁骨钩钢板组并发症发生率明显低于保守治疗组,且差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论采用锁骨钩钢板内固定手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位,治疗效果较好,是治疗肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位较好的方法。     

改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复治疗肩锁关节脱位

目的研究改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复治疗肩锁关节脱位临床效果。 方法对2014年1月至2019年3月期间在本院使用改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复进行治疗的21例肩锁关节脱位患者临床资料进行分析,包括脱位类型、受伤原因、手术时间、关节活动范围、X线片检查结果、美国肩肘协会评分（American shoulder and elbow surgeons,ASES）、Constant肩关节评分及Karlsson术后疗效评价。 结果21例患者获得随访,随访时间（13.05 ±2.62）个月,手术时间（50.57±8.13）min,术前等待时间（2.71±1.35）d。肩关节活动范围：前屈（167.14±5.19）°,后伸（41.14±2.20）°,外展（167.24±7.07）°,外旋（52.10±4.99）°,内旋（83.33±3.61）°。ASES评分（94.19±4.01）分（86.67 ~ 100分）,Constant评分（92.95±4.98）分（78 ~ 99分）,根据Karlsson术后疗效评价标准：优为15例（71.4%）、良为6例（28.6%）。 结论改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复技术治疗肩锁关节脱位可以获得良好的临床效果。     

关节镜下Twin Tail TightRope带袢钛板Y型固定治疗急性RockwoodⅢb型以上肩锁关节脱位的早期疗效

目的评价Twin Tail TightRope带袢钛板Y型固定术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的早期临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析2015年6月至2017年6月昆明市第一人民医院采用Twin Tail TightRope带袢钛板内固定系统在关节镜下行Y型固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位患者共16例。采用视觉模拟评分法（visual analogue scale，VAS）及Constant-Murley评分评估手术效果。 结果所有患者获得随访，随访时间3~12个月，平均（6.48±1.51）个月。术后无血管、神经损伤及切口感染，末次随访时均未发生复位丢失、锁骨应力性骨折、喙突切割等并发症。末次随访时VAS评分（0.36±0.04）分较术前（7.46±1.24）分降低，Constant-Murley评分（90.07±3.13）分较术前（46.13±3.25）分提高。 结论采用Twin Tail TightRope带袢钛板Y型固定术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位可有效解决术后水平、前后方向不稳定问题，此技术具有较低的锁骨、喙突骨折发生率，关节镜下操作可以减少手术损伤、提高精准度。     

Conservative or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. A prospective, controlled, randomized study

In a prospective, controlled, randomized study of acute acromioclavicular dislocations, we compared conservative and operative treatment (the Phemister procedure) with regard to the clinical results, complications, and social costs. Forty-one patients were operated on and forty-three patients were treated conservatively. Two patients who were operated on and three who were treated conservatively had to have the lateral extremity of the clavicle resected because of pain. The rehabilitation period was significantly shorter with non-operative treatment, and after thirteen months there was no difference in the clinical results. There were no serious postoperative complications, but about half of the patients who were operated on had problems with the metallic device, such as breakage or migration of the pins, or both, and six patients had a superficial infection. For most patients with total acromioclavicular dislocation we recommend conservative treatment with a sling until the patient is free of pain. Operation should be considered in thin patients who have a prominent lateral end of the clavicle, in those who do heavy work, and in patients whose daily work requires that the shoulder often be held in about 90 degrees of abduction and flexion.     

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury

The management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of posttraumatic anatomic alterations after surgical or conservative treatment of type III injuries and to analyze their effect on the outcome. Forty-three patients were evaluated retrospectively, clinically and radiographically, at a 12-month minimum follow-up. Thirty-two were treated surgically, using the Phemister technique, and 11 had conservative treatment. A comparison of the overall clinical results in both groups showed no statistically significant differences. The acromioclavicular joint was anatomically reduced in only half of the surgical patients. Those shoulders treated surgically showed a significantly higher incidence of osteoarthritis and coracoclavicular ligament ossification. Differences in clavicular deformity or osteolysis were not significant. None of these abnormalities had any influence on the clinical result. Because operative and conservative treatments achieve equally good clinical results and surgery carries a higher risk of osteoarthritis, we recommend managing this injury conservatively.     

应用缝合锚钉解剖重建肩锁关节的临床效果

目的评估应用缝合锚钉重建喙锁韧带,治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的临床结果。 方法自2014年2月至2015年6月接受手术治疗的急性肩锁关节脱位患者13例,其中男性8例、女性5例;平均年龄为（40.0±15.6）岁。应用缝合锚钉重建喙锁韧带,复位固定肩锁关节。术后应用三维CT评估喙突上缝合锚钉的位置情况;通过肩关节正位片评估肩锁关节复位保持情况,并测量喙锁间距;记录肩关节的活动范围、视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）和Constant-Merly评分。 结果所有患者均顺利康复。术后肩关节前屈上举平均为171.5°,体侧外旋为70.8°,体侧内旋为T8。VAS评分为（0.3±0.6）分,Constant-Merly评分为92.4分。术后术侧的喙锁间距平均为（8.9±3.0）mm,健侧的喙锁间距平均为（7.7±1.7）mm,两者之间差异无统计学意义（P=0.119）。26枚锚钉中有23枚位置良好,1枚锚钉刺穿了喙突的下表面,2枚锚钉位置偏向内侧。1例患者肩锁关节复位完全丢失,1例患者肩锁关节复位部分丢失,其Constant-Merly评分分别为74分和84分。 结论通过在喙突基底部准确地置入缝合锚钉,可以解剖重建喙锁韧带,恢复肩锁关节的垂直和水平稳定性。该技术创伤小,可以取得较为满意的临床结果。     

Posttraumatische bipolare Luxation der Klavikula

Bipolar dislocation of the clavicle (“floating clavicle”) is extremely rare. It exists no standardised treatment for this trauma and the treatment is often conservative. This is mainly an anterior displacement of the sternoclavicular joint (type III according to Allman) and a posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint (type IV according to Rockwood). We report on a 60 year old male who fell onto the right shoulder. He sustained a ‘floating clavicle’ and had a massive dislocation, impairment of range of motion and pain. Venous congestion was observable. We stabilised the dislocated acromioclavicular joint with a Balser’s plate, the sternoclavicular joint was fixed with PDS cord tension band technique around the first rip and the sternum. In addition we resected the anterior part of the distal clavicle to get a better cosmetic result. Post-operatively the patient had an excellent range of motion without any further symptoms after six weeks and one year. Venous congestion was not more observable. In most of the cases dislocations of both ends of the clavicle are treated conservatively. We recommend an operative treatment especially in young and active patients to avoid re-dislocation and to archive better cosmetic results.     

Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation: comparison between two surgical procedures for anatomic reconstruction

Introduction

Surgical treatment of chronic complete acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is still debated and no gold standard surgical procedure has been identified.

Materials and methods

A retrospective series of 90 patients treated for AC dislocations is reported here. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 receiving AC reconstruction with a Dacron vascular prosthesis; group 2 receiving AC reconstruction with LARS^® artificial ligament; group 3 receiving conservative treatment. Follow-up was performed after 1, 6 and 15 months with plain radiographs, UCLA, SPADI and modified UCLA acromioclavicular rating scales.

Results

Patients treated surgically presented significant better functional outcome compared to patients treated conservatively with overall positive results in 93.3% of patients for group 2 and 53.3% of patients for group 1. However, reconstruction with Dacron vascular prosthesis presented an unacceptable high complications rate (43.3%).

Conclusion

Our results show that anatomic AC reconstruction with LARS^® artificial ligament resulted in both satisfactory functional outcome and low complication rate. Therefore, we recommend this procedure for the treatment of chronic complete AC dislocations.     

带袢钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效比较

目的探讨带袢钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的近期疗效。方法将44例RockwoodⅢ型以上的肩锁关节脱位的患者按治疗方式分为带袢钢板组(19例)和锁骨钩钢板组(25例)进行手术治疗。术后定期随访,观察并比较疼痛视觉评分(VAS)、肩关节活动度(包括肩关节外展、外旋及内旋的角度),应用Constant-Murley评分和Karlsson分级评估手术疗效。结果 44例均获得随访,时间10~18(12.3±1.5)个月。末次随访时,Constant-Murley评分和Karlsson分级优良率评分,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),但VAS和肩关节活动度两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论带袢钢板与锁骨钩钢板两种手术方法治疗肩锁关节脱位近期疗效相当,但带袢钢板能更好地改善患肩关节早期的疼痛和活动度。     

TightRope带袢钛板系统治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效

目的探讨TightRope带袢钛板系统治疗RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。方法对48例RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位患者采用TightRope带袢钛板系统内固定治疗。术后6个月参照肩关节Karlsson和Constant-Murley评定标准进行疗效评估。结果48例均手术顺利,未发生血管、神经损伤,术后均未出现术口感染、皮肤坏死等并发症。患者均获得随访,时间9~24个月。术后6个月,采用Karlsson标准评定疗效:优40例,良7例,差1例,优良率97.9%;Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分总分(93.42±3.59)分,较术前(51.36±6.27)分明显提高(P<0.05)。结论TightRope带袢钛板系统治疗RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位具有切口小、患者活动早、并发症少、无需取出内固定等优点。     

锁骨钩钢板与三Endobutton钢板治疗新鲜肩锁关节脱位疗效比较

目的与锁骨钩钢板比较,探讨三Endobutton钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ～Ⅴ型新鲜肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。方法 2008年2月-2010年10月,收治40例RockwoodⅢ～Ⅴ型新鲜肩锁关节脱位患者。其中22例采用锁骨钩钢板治疗(对照组),18例采用三Endobutton钢板治疗(试验组)。两组患者性别、年龄、病程、肩锁关节脱位分型、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Constant-Murley评分等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),具有可比性。结果术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无血管、神经损伤及感染等早期并发症发生。患者均获随访,试验组随访时间12～20个月,平均15.8个月;对照组为13～24个月,平均17.2个月。末次随访时两组患肩VAS评分及Constant-Murley评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。X线片示患者均无内固定物松动,无肩锁关节再脱位。结论三Endobutton钢板治疗术后肩关节疼痛及活动受限发生率均低于锁骨钩钢板,是治疗RockwoodⅢ～Ⅴ型新鲜肩锁关节脱位的有效方法。     

空心钉固定联合半腱肌肌腱重建喙锁韧带治疗Ⅲ度肩锁关节脱位

目的探讨空心钉固定联合半腱肌肌腱重建喙锁韧带治疗Ⅲ度肩锁关节脱位的疗效。方法对22例Ⅲ度肩锁关节脱位患者行空心钉固定联合半腱肌肌腱重建喙锁韧带治疗。结果患者均获随访,时间10～32个月。肩关节功能恢复良好,局部畸形消失,未见复发。参照Karlsson疗效评定标准:A级18例,B级4例。结论该手术方法设计符合生物力学的要求,方法简单,复位作用良好,是治疗Ⅲ度新鲜肩锁关节脱位有效方法。     

Acute acromioclavicular dislocations treated by fixation of the joint and ligament repair or reconstruction

We reviewed 55 patients, median age 34 years, who had had acute complete acromioclavicular dislocation treated by transient acromioclavicular fixation with a Knowles pin and ligament repair by suturing or reconstruction of the superior acromioclavicular ligament with transfer of the coracoid end of the coracoacromial ligament onto the clavicle. At followup examination 50 patients showed at least a satisfactory result. Five cases, two of which had had subsequent resection of the distal end of the clavicle, were classified as poor, mainly because of pain, even though the functional result was good in three. Reconstruction of the superior acromioclavicular ligament, although it improved the anatomic result, was shown to be of no advantage and may even have caused discomfort. The numerous radiological findings of residual subluxation or dislocation, deformity of the distal end of the clavicle, soft tissue calcification and osteoarthritis or pathological physical findings did not correlate significantly with the clinical outcomes. In general this operation gave results comparable with those achieved by other operative methods. It is useful if surgery is preferred to conservative treatment.     

Triple-Endobutton钢板治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型及以上肩锁关节脱位

目的 探讨Triple-Endobutton钢板在治疗RockwoodⅢ型及以上肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析我科治疗的RockwoodⅢ型及以上肩锁关节脱位病人50例,根据病人收治入院时间先后分为:2009年1月至2011年12月采用钩钢板治疗的25例RockwoodⅢ型及以上肩锁关节脱位病人,纳入钩钢板组;2012年1月至2015年12月予Triple-Endobutton钢板手术治疗的25例RockwoodⅢ型及以上肩锁关节脱位病人,纳入Endobutton组.比较两组病人术后3、6、9个月的患侧肩膀疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分,并采用Constant-Murley评分评定肩关节功能.结果 病人全部获得随访,随访时间为9~12个月,平均为10个月.术后3个月Endobutton组的VAS评分及肩关节Constant-Murley评分明显优于钩钢板组(均P<0.05);术后6、9个月Endobutton组的VAS评分优于钩钢板组(P=0.005,P=0.009),而Constant-Murley评分与钩钢板组差异无统计学意义(P=0.051,P=0.061).结论 Tri-ple-Endobutton钢板重建喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位,能有效降低术后肩部疼痛,对肩关节功能影响小,有利于肩关节功能的早期恢复,临床治疗效果满意.     

RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位保守治疗与自体腓骨长肌腱重建喙锁韧带治疗的疗效对比研究

目的比较保守治疗与自体腓骨长肌腱前侧半（anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon, AHPLT）重建喙锁韧带治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效。 方法自2013年6月至2016年3月共收治36例Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位患者。根据治疗方式不同将患者分为重建喙锁韧带组（利用自体AHPLT重建技术治疗）15例和保守治疗组21例。记录术前及术后（或保守治疗后）1、3、6、12个月的肩关节Constant、Quick DASH、VAS评分综合评估患者肩关节功能情况,并通过影像学分析复位是否丢失。 结果重建喙锁韧带组和保守组在随访1年时,患侧Constant评分分别为95.27分和97.02分,均较术前或保守治疗前Constant评分49.8分和51.8分显著提高,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,重建组和保守组间Constant评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。一年时Quick DASH评分重建组和保守组分别为6分和2.38分,均较术前或保守治疗前23.8分和16.15分显著降低（P<0.05）,重建组和保守组间Quick DASH评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。一年时VAS评分重建组和保守组分别为0.33分和0.10分,均较术前或保守治疗前4.73分和4.38分显著降低（P<0.05）,重建组和保守组间VAS评分无统计学意义（P>0.05）。1个月时,重建组Constant评分43.4分,Quick DASH评分58分,VAS评分4.27分,疗效均较保守组Constant评分65.17分,Quick DASH评分36.19分,VAS评分2.48分差（P<0.05）。3个月时重建组与保守组Constant评分无明显差异,但保守组Quick DASH评分与VAS评分较重建组好（P<0.05）。6个月时,两组间Constant评分和Quick DASH评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,而VAS评分保守组较重建组更低,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。影像学检查提示随访1年时,重建组15例患者中有3例发生复位丢失（20%）,保守组21例中发生复位丢失的有5例（23.81%）。重建组患者均无感染,锁骨、喙突骨折等并发症发生。 结论对于Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁脱位患者,采用重建喙锁韧带治疗或者保守治疗均能达到较好的临床效果,在早期,采用保守治疗的患者其功能和疼痛优于重建韧带治疗的患者。     

Capacity to participate in sports after injuries of the acromioclavicular joint

In 79 patients athletic activities were evaluated retrospectively 32 months after grade II and grade III sprains of the acromioclavicular joint. Group I consisted of 29 patients with grade II sprains according to Tossy and group II consisted of 50 patients with grade III sprains according to Tossy. In group Ia 14 patients underwent surgery, and in group Ib 15 patients were treated nonsurgically. In group IIa 41 patients were treated surgically, and in group IIb 9 patients were treated conservatively. Forty-seven patients were injured during participation in sports. Among these 16 were injured during participation in their specific sport. In group I patients had to curtail sports activities more frequently after surgery than after conservative treatment (p < 0.05). In group II the reduction of sports activities was not different for the two treatment groups. Of a total of 79 patients, 23 had to reduce their sports activities. Among these, 7 patients had to give up sports. All patients had performed overhead athletic activities. Climbers and patients performing strength training had to reduce their activities or give up sports. Additionally, sprains of the acromi-oclavicular joint adversely affected athletic activities in overhead ball sports, bicycling, and skiing irrespective of treatment.     

Anterior acromioplasty for subacromial impingement in patients younger than 40 years of age

The indications and results of anterior acromioplasty in patients older than 40 years of age are well documented; however, little is reported concerning this procedure in younger patients because the majority are treated conservatively. Over the last seven years, 26 patients younger than 40 years of age were treated by anterior acromioplasty for subacromial impingement resistant to conservative therapy. The indication for surgery was failed conservative therapy in 17 patients. Six patients had impingement despite previous surgery, such as failed acromioplasty, biceps tenolysis, and biceps tenodesis. Two patients had impingement secondary to greater tuberosity malunion. The average duration of symptoms was 27 months and of conservative therapy, 17 months. All patients had a bursectomy and anterior acromioplasty. In addition, eight had a complete acromioclavicular arthroplasty for concurrent acromioclavicular arthritis, four had a modified acromioclavicular arthroplasty for impingement under the acromioclavicular joint, three had calcium excisions, and one had a rotator cuff repair. The greater tuberosity malunions were advanced in one patient and excised in one. The results were 81% (21) excellent and good, 15% (four) fair, and 4% (one) poor. The average follow-up period was 33 months. The majority of younger patients with subacromial impingement can be successfully treated conservatively. In those patients with persistent symptoms, open acromioplasty can reliably give good results with regard to pain and function.     

急性肩锁关节脱位Rockwood Ⅲ~Ⅴ型手术治疗中锁骨钩钢板和袢钢板应用效果的比较分析

目的比较急性肩锁关节脱位Rockwood Ⅲ ~ Ⅴ型手术治疗中锁骨钩钢板和袢钢板应用效果。 方法选取2013年3月至2018年3月上海市同仁医院收治的急性肩锁关节脱位患者93例,依据手术过程中使用的钢板类型将患者分成两组,锁骨钩组（n=42）应用锁骨钩钢板,袢钢板组（n=51）应用袢钢板。观察比较两组的相关手术指标水平;比较术前、术后的视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale/score,VAS）及肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分变化情况;比较两组手术后的不良并发症发生情况。 结果袢钢板组切口长度短于锁骨钩组（P<0.05）,袢钢板组手术时间长于锁骨钩组（P<0.05）,袢钢板组术中出血量低于锁骨钩组（P<0.05）,袢钢板组恢复工作时间短于锁骨钩组（P<0.05）;手术前两组VAS评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,手术后两组的VAS评分较治疗前均显著升高,但袢钢板组VAS评分低于锁骨钩组（P<0.05）;手术前两组Constant-Murley评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,手术后袢钢板组Constant-Murley评分显著高于锁骨钩组（P<0.05）,袢钢板组基本无肩关节功能丢失,钩钢板外展受限明显;锁骨钩组并发症发生率显著高于袢钢板组（P<0.05）。 结论对急性肩锁关节脱位Rockwood Ⅲ～Ⅴ型患者进行手术治疗的过程中,两种类型的钢板都能使患者的肩关节功能得到有效恢复。袢钢板组患者手术切口、术中出血量、术后疼痛评分及并发症发生率更低;锁骨钩组手术时间更短,应综合患者的实际情况来进行选择。