Complications of halo fixation of the cervical spine

Halo fixators play an integral role in stabilizing the cervical spine. They are most widely used after upper cervical to midcervical spine fractures and dislocations and as a supplement to various surgical fixation techniques. Compared with supine cervical traction techniques, halo fixators allow early patient mobilization and shorten hospital stays. The incidence of halo-fixator complications remains high. Minor complications include pin loosening, localized infection, periorbital edema, superficial pressure sores, and unsightly scars. Major complications include pin penetration, osteomyelitis, subdural abscess, nerve palsies, fracture overdistraction, and persistent instability. Many of these potential complications can be avoided with proper pin placement and meticulous pin care.     

Simple cervical spine traction using a halo vest apparatus: technical note

BACKGROUND: A halo vest apparatus, commonly used for external immobilization and protection of the cervical spine, offers several advantages. We present here a simple, accurate, easy, and safe cervical traction technique using a halo vest apparatus. METHODS: The distinguishing feature of our technique is that, after application of a halo vest apparatus, the halo crown is distracted gradually and stepwise by turning the bilateral screw bolts that hold the halo crown over a period of one to several weeks. After each of these steps, care must be taken to check neurologic, radiologic, and skin conditions, as well as cranial pin tightening. CONCLUSIONS: This distance control technique can provide a strong and accurate traction force by simply turning the bolts without the risk of overdistraction or the need for bed rest, and can be used in conjunction with radiologic examination and transportation of patients, even those unable to walk. The Sugita head fixation system constitutes a safe and easy way to facilitate surgical management after correction of cervical dislocation.     

Pin loosening in a halo-vest orthosis: a biomechanical study

STUDY DESIGN: The cranial pin force history of a halo-vest orthosis was measured using an instrumented halo in a clinical study with three patients. Pin force values at the time of halo-vest application and at subsequent clinical visits during the halo-vest wear period were compared. OBJECTIVES: To document the pin force reduction in the cranial pins of a halo-vest orthosis in vivo. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The halo-vest is an orthosis commonly used to immobilize and protect the cervical spine. An important problem with halo-vest use is pin loosening. There have been no previous reports of pin force history in vivo. METHODS: A custom-built strain-gauged, open-ring halo was used to measure the compressive force and superiorly-inferiorly directed shear forces produced at the tips of the two posterior pins. The instrumented halo was applied to three patients with cervical spine fractures. Pin force measurements were recorded at the time of halo application and at subsequent follow-up visits during the entire treatment period. RESULTS: A mean compressive force of 343 +/- 64.6 N was produced at the pin tips during halo application with the patient in a supine position. On average, the compressive forces decreased by 83% (P = 0.002) during the typical halo-vest wear period. The compressive forces were substantially greater than the shear forces, which averaged only -11+/-30.2 N at the time of halo application and which did not change significantly with time. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the hypothesized decrease in the compressive pin forces with time. All patients had developed at least some clinical symptoms of pin loosening at the time of halo-vest removal.     

Das besondere Instrument Der Halo-Fixateur

OBJECTIVE: Installation of an external fixator in combination with a body cast for temporary or definitive immobilization and retention of unstable fractures of the craniocervical junction and upper part of the cervical spine. Further established applications include presurgical extension treatment of paralytic scoliosis and temporary retention within complex spine deformity operations after ventral release or mobilized osteotomies. INDICATIONS: Closed reposition and temporary retention of unstable injuries of the cervical spine up to operation. Extension treatment for careful reposition of fresh or dated malpositions of the cervical spine. Conservative treatment of injuries of the craniocervical junction and the upper part of the cervical spine. Presurgical extension of paralytic scoliosis. Temporary extension after ventral release. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Cranial fractures and intracranial injuries. Soft-tissue infections of the skull. Children < 3 years. Adiposity, chest injuries and paraplegia as relative contraindications using the halo body cast. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Halo traction is applied in two stages; first, the head ring is attached to the skull, then, the body cast and suspension assembly are added. Local anesthesia, depending on circumstances. Sizing of the components; the optimal size of the ring is about 1.5" larger than the circumference of the patient's head. Patient in sitting or supine position. The halo ring is held in proper position by stabilizer plates; the lower margin of the ring should be just above the ears and about 0.4" above the eyebrows. The anterior pins are placed in shallow groove on the forehead between supraorbital ridges and frontal protuberances. Threaded skull pins are screwed with defined torque (4-8"/pounds) in the lamina externa of the cranial calotte without perforating the lamina interna. To avoid side-to-side drifting, the diagonally opposite pins should be tightened simultaneously. Finally, connection of the halo ring with a body cast or putting on an extension device. RESULTS: Secure external stabilization of unstable injuries of upper cervical spine. Improvement of correction results of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent surgical treatment. Disadvantages are procedure-specific complications (infection and loosening of head pins) with different published frequencies and decreased patient's acceptance at longer therapy duration.     

头环背心在颈椎外科的应用

作者观察了用头环背心治疗多种原因所致颈椎不稳定的应用效果。用头环背心治疗了１０７例颈椎不稳定的病人，病种包括结核、损伤、肿瘤和畸形。病人分为非手术治疗组和融合术组。融合术包括寰枢椎后路融合术、枕颈融合术和下颈椎融合术。各种融合术都在头环背心的固定下施行，不用任何内固定。测量了２３例病人用头环背心固定前后的肺功能。１０７例病人中有８９例获得了随访，平均随访时间２５个月，非手术组的病人在头环背心固定下均恢复了颈椎的稳定性。在３１例行寰枢椎后路融合术的病人中有２９例融合成功（９４％），３６例行枕颈融合术的病人中有３２例达到了骨性愈合（８９％）。用头环背心固定的平均时间是１３３天，最长的４５０天。统计学结果显示：用头环背心固定后病人肺活量的均数与固定前相比差异有非常显著性（Ｐ＜０．０１），固定后肺活量减少约１３％。并发症包括颅钉松动（２４例）、钉孔感染（４例）、复位丢失（４例）、颅钉穿透颅骨内板（３例）、背心下皮肤压疮（１例）。作者认为头环背心对颈椎失稳的病人是一种安全、有效的外固定器材。借助这种装置，部分需行颈椎融合术的病人可以免去内固定，使手术更安全、简便。头环背心可使病人的肺活量减少。     

Brain abscess and generalized seizure caused by halo pin intracranial penetration: case report and review of the literature

The objective of our study is to report a rare complication of halo pin insertion associated with an epileptic seizure and brain abscess, and to discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to its management. The treatment of unstable cervical spine injuries with a halo vest is an established procedure. Complications of pin penetration such as brain abscess and seizure are rare, and need to be urgently treated. Intracranial abscess and seizure associated with the use of the halo device is an unusual complication, and only a few cases have been reported in the literature. A 21-year-old male had a halo vest placed for the management of an odontoid type II fracture, which he sustained from a motor vehicle accident. Ten weeks after halo ring placement he complained of headaches which relieved by analgesics. After 2 weeks he was admitted at the emergency unit in an unconscious condition after a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The halo pins were displaced during the seizure and were removed at his admission. No drainage was noted from the pin sites, and a Philadelphia cervical collar was applied. A brain CT and MRI revealed intracranial penetration of both posterior pins and a brain abscess in the right parietal lobe. Computed tomography of the cervical spine revealed stable fusion of the odontoid fracture. Cultures from the pin sites were negative; however, intravenous wide spectrum antibiotic treatment was administered to the patient immediately for 4 weeks followed by oral antibiotics for additional 2 weeks. Anti-epileptic medication was also started at his admission. The patient was discharged from the hospital in 6 weeks without symptoms, continuing anti-epileptic medication. On the follow-up visits he had fully recovered without any neurologic sequelae. In conclusion, complications of halo pin penetration are rare which need immediate intervention. Any neurologic or infectious, local or generalized, symptom need to be investigated urgently with available imaging techniques and treated promptly. Pin over-tightening may cause bone penetration and possible deep cranial infection with serious complications.     

Asymptomatic brain abscess as a complication of halo orthosis: Report of a case and review of the literature

The halo external orthosis has been used extensively for cervical immobilization after spine surgery or trauma, usually without serious complications. However, nine brain abscesses have been reported as complications following the use of halo orthosis. We report on a 53-year-old man who underwent anterior cervical fusion for cervical myelopathy, followed by the application of a halo orthosis. Approximately 4 weeks postfusion, loosening of the right anterior pin was recognized and the pin was tightened, as the pin-site was clean. One week later, purulent material was discharged from the pin hole when the pin was removed after it had loosened again. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) demonstrated an abscess on the right side of the brain. After the administration of antibiotics, the abscess resolved without surgical intervention. We describe asymptomatic brain abscess complicating the use of a halo orthosis and review the clinical features, symptoms, and outcomes; we also discuss the mechanism that induced brain abscess. Most reported cases of abscess have been associated with pin-site infection or tightening after late pin loosening. The present case indicates the importance of early recognition of symptoms and signs associated with brain abscess in patients with a halo orthosis. Received for publication on June 22, 1998; accepted on Aug. 28, 1998     

Comparison of halo complications in adults and children

A retrospective analysis of 128 patients who underwent halo vest application for a variety of cervical spine problems was undertaken to determine complications associated with its use. Ninety-three (72%) were available for review. In comparison with a recent report, the complication rate was much lower. Only 8% of adults had major problems, consisting of pin tract infection and significant pin loosening requiring replacement. However, 39% (5 of 13) children had major problems. This report details our method of halo application and follow-up care.     

The halo skeletal fixator. Principles of application and maintenance

The halo skeletal fixator, originally developed for use in patients with poliomyelitis, is now widely used with many types of cervical spine instabilities. Despite its demonstrated effectiveness, certain problem areas, including pin loosening and infection, have been identified. These problems have subsequently inspired detailed studies of skull osteology, biomechanics of pin fixation, and comparisons of techniques of application. Based on these studies, specific recommendations concerning the application and maintenance of the halo have developed. Anterior pin sites should be located in the safe zone approximately 1 cm superior to the orbital rim, cephalad to the lateral two-thirds of the orbit, and below the greatest circumference of the skull. The optimal posterior pin sites are located posterolaterally, diagonal to the corresponding contralateral anterior pins. Pins should be inserted perpendicular to the skull, tightened to eight inch/pounds (0.90 Newton-meter), and retightened once at 48 hours. A subsequent loose pin may be retightened once to eight inch/pounds if resistance is met; otherwise, it should be removed and a new one placed in a different location. Infected pins require antibiotic therapy, wound care, and possibly pin-site change and wound debridement.     

Six-pin halo fixation and the resulting prevalence of pin-site complications

BACKGROUND: In spite of the many advances in halo application technique, the prevalence of complications associated with the use of halo fixation remains high, particularly at the pin sites. Many practitioners do not use more than four pins for halo application in adults because they believe that it increases the risk of complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of six pins in halo application, in order to determine if the extra pins increased fixation strength without increasing the overall pin-site complication rate. METHODS: The first part of our study consisted of force-deflection tests conducted on models of the skull fitted with either a four or a six-pin halo to determine if the six-pin halo provided greater fixation strength. Each skull model was placed in a servocontrolled hydraulic test machine; an axial distraction force was then applied until failure occurred. The second part of the study was a retrospective analysis of sixty-three patient records to document the prevalence of pin-site complications in patients treated with a six-pin halo system; these findings were then compared with established complication rates associated with four-pin halos. RESULTS: In the force-deflection tests, the mean load to failure of the six-pin halo construct (2879 N [647 lb]) showed the system to be significantly stronger (p = 0.0033) than the four-pin halo construct (1681 N [378 lb]). Of the sixty-three patient records reviewed, five (8% [95% confidence interval, 1% to 15%]) revealed pin-loosening; no infection was recorded for these five patients. One of the sixty-three patients had redness and erythema at "multiple sites," but these areas healed well. Another presented with infection at all six sites; this was recorded as an allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Six-pin halo fixation results in greater halo strength and cervical spine stabilization without increasing the risk of pin-site complications. Clinical Relevance: Our findings are relevant for current clinical practice as the high complication rates associated with halo application have deterred some practitioners from using this type of fixation. The use of six pins, along with an improved protocol for halo application and care, may contribute to a more successful treatment outcome with fewer complications.     

A halo jacket for stabilisation of the paediatric cervical spine

Summary Stabilisation of the paediatric cervical spine may be necessary in the management of trauma, infection and deformity. Surgery is technically difficult due to the immaturity of the bony elements and therefore external support is generally preferred. Our experience of halter traction and Minerva casts is that they either fail to achieve stability or are poorly tolerated. Halo pins are associated with significant pin tract complications in children. The technique for application of a plaster halo jacket is presented, together with the results of its use in eight children. Attention is drawn to the ease of application, tolerance by the patients and absence of significant complications.     

Halo vest versus spinal fusion for cervical injury: evidence from an outcome study

The indications for surgical fusion, as opposed to halo fixation, in the management of cervical spine injury are still unclear. At St. Louis University Medical Center a conservative protocol has been adopted to treat almost all cervical spine fractures with halo fixation. To determine what factors have contributed to failure of halo fixation, the records and radiographs of all patients with cervical spine injuries who were treated at that institution between 1984 and 1986 were reviewed. During this interval, 124 patients were treated, consisting of 93 men and 31 women between 6 and 94 years old. Of these, 15 (12%) had cervical fusion without preoperative halo device application. This group included eight patients with old injuries and delayed diagnosis, three with nonreducible locked facets, and four with miscellaneous indications. The remaining 109 patients were treated with halo vests. Four died before completing the 3-month standard treatment. Of those completing the treatment, 48 had C1-2 level injuries and 57 had C3-T1 level injuries. Sixteen patients (15%) failed their halo treatments and required surgical fusion: eight while still in halo fixation and eight after they had completed treatment with a halo device. Failure of halo treatment was indicated by recurrent dislocation in 13 patients and increased neurological deficit in three. Thirteen of the patients who failed treatment had C3-T1 injuries and three had C1-2 injuries. Of 27 patients with odontoid fractures, only two (7.4%) failed halo fixation. There were no failures in 11 patients with hangman's fractures. Of the 57 patients with C3-T1 injuries, 13 (23%) failed treatment, nine of whom had locked or "perched" facets. The factors causing failure of halo fixation were analyzed. The overall success rate was 85%, suggesting that the halo vest can be used to treat most patients with cervical spine injuries. Under certain circumstances (in the presence of old injuries, difficult reduction, or locked or "perched" facets), surgery may be indicated to avoid unnecessary delay in definitive management.     

Complications of halo treatment for cervical spine injuries in patients with ankylosing spondylitis--report of three cases

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis are prone to injuries of the cervical spine even with minor trauma. Although the fractures are markedly unstable, nonsurgical treatment using a halo-thoracic plaster or jacket is a common approach. METHODS: We present three patients with cervicothoracic fractures of the ankylosed spine to describe problems and complications inherent in this type of treatment. In two, pin track infections and pin protrusion through the skull occurred, leading in one case to an intracerebral hemorrhage. In the third patient, the halo had to be removed after 8 months, just early enough to prevent the pins from cutting through. RESULTS: One patient required craniotomy. The second one could be resolved by local revision. In the third case, the fracture eventually united after using a stiff collar for 2 years. CONCLUSION: Halo treatment for cervical spine fracture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is a challenging task for orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons.     

Application of the halo device for immobilization of the cervical spine utilizing an increased torque pressure

The rates for loosening and infection of the pins used in the halo apparatus are unfortunately high. The commonly recommended amount of torque to be used in applying the pins is 0.68 newton-meter (six inch-pounds). Forty-two adult patients underwent application of a halo device for immobilization of the cervical spine using an increased torque of 0.90 newton-meter (eight inch-pounds). The rate for loosening of the pins and the rate for infection at the pin site dropped from 36 per cent to 7 per cent and 20 per cent to 2 per cent, respectively.     

Halo Skeletal Fixation: Techniques of Application and Prevention of Complications

The halo skeletal fixator provides the most rigid cervical immobilization of all orthoses. However, complications such as pin loosening and infection are common. Appreciation of local anatomy and adherence to established application guidelines should minimize pin-related problems. A relatively safe zone for anterior pin placement is located 1 cm above the orbital rim and superior to the lateral two thirds of the orbit. Posterior pin-site locations are less critical; positioning on the posterolateral aspect of the skull, diagonal to the contralateral anterior pins, is generally desirable. Pins should enter the skull perpendicular to the cortex, with the ring or crown sitting below the widest portion of the skull and passing about 1 cm above the helix of the ear. Pins are inserted at a torque of 8 in-lb and retightened once to 8 in-lb at 48 hours. A loose pin can be retightened to 8 in-lb if resistance is met; otherwise, a loose pin should be replaced at a nearby site. Superficially infected pins are managed with local pin care and oral antibiotics. Persistent or severe infections require pin replacement to a nearby site, parenteral antibiotic therapy, and incision and drainage as needed. In-ability to maintain acceptable cervical reduction with a halo fixator is an indication for alternative treatment, such as internal fixation or traction.     

Masking of vertebral artery dissection by severe trauma to the cervical spine

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective case study was performed. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate the association of cervical trauma with vertebral artery dissection, and to propose a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for suspected traumatic vertebral artery dissection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebral artery dissection is a recognized but underdiagnosed complication of trauma to the cervical spine. Symptoms of spinal cord injury, however, may obscure those of vertebral artery dissection, presumably causing gross underdiagnosis of this complication. METHODS: All patients with vertebral artery dissection admitted to the authors' facility between 1992 and 1997 were screened for cervical trauma. RESULTS: This article presents four patients with severe trauma to the cervical spine, defined as luxation, subluxation, or fracture, in whom symptoms of vertebral artery dissection developed after a delay ranging from several hours to weeks. The traumatic vertebral artery dissection typically was located at the site of vertebral injury or cranial to it. One patient with fracture of the odontoid process survived symptom free without ischemic brain infarctions. Another patient survived with traumatic quadriplegia in addition to large cerebellar and posterior cerebral artery infarctions. Two patients died as a result of fulminant vertebrobasilar infarctions, both with only moderate impairment from the primary spinal cord injury. CONCLUSIONS: Early signs of vertebral artery dissection include head and neck pain, often localized to the site of intimal disruption, which may be disguised by the signs of the spinal injury. Early Doppler ultrasound and duplex sonography as a noninvasive screening method should be performed for patients with severe trauma to the cervical spine. In cases of vertebral artery dissection, immediate anticoagulation should be initiated. Traumatologists should be aware of this complication in evaluating patients with severe trauma of the cervical spine, and also for a variety of forensic reasons.     

Acrylic stabilization of the cervical spine for neoplastic disease: evolution of a technique for vertebral body replacement

The resection of collapsed cervical vertebral bodies affected by malignant lytic lesions often requires innovative methods for stabilization. Over the years, immediate stabilization of the cervical spine has been achieved with acrylic bridges, preformed metallic placement bodies, fibular strut grafts, and other aids. Because acrylic bonds poorly to adjacent bony structures, techniques to assure the adequate fixation of an acrylic bridge between resected vertebral bodies are needed. The possible progression of disease in adjacent bone prompts us to maximize the amount of internal fixation with rods or pins to assure stability. Lasting stability has become more important as the longevity of cancer patients has been increased by multimodality therapy. We report our technique for treating cancer patients with acrylic and pin fixation of the cervical spine after vertebral body excision by the anterior route. Certain modifications of the technique may have advantages over previously reported procedures. Our series of six cases demonstrates the evolution of a technique that allows relatively rapid and easy decompression of the cervical spinal cord and provides immediate stability of the cervical spine. Our indications and contraindications for this procedure are also discussed.     

Does optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of timing of spine fracture fixation on outcome in multiply injured patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is little consensus regarding the optimal timing of spine fracture fixation after blunt trauma. Potential advantages of early fixation include earlier patient mobilization and fewer septic complications; disadvantages include compounded complications from associated injuries and inconvenience of surgical scheduling. METHODS: Patients with spine fractures from blunt trauma admitted to an urban level 1 trauma center during a 42-month period who required surgical spine fracture fixation were identified from the registry. Patients were analyzed according to timing of fixation, level of spine injury, and impact of associated injuries (measured by injury severity score). Early fixation was defined as within 3 days of injury, and late fixation was after 3 days. Outcomes analyzed were intensive care unit and hospital stay, ventilator days, pneumonia, survival, and hospital charges. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-one patients had spine fracture fixation, 142 (49%) early and 149 (51%) late. Patients were clinically similar relative to age, admission blood pressure, injury severity score, and chest abbreviated injury scale score. The intensive care unit stay was shorter for patients with early fixation. The incidence of pneumonia was lower for patients with early fixation. Charges were lower for patients with early fixation. Patients were stratified by level of spine injury. There were 163 cervical (83 early, 80 late), 79 thoracic (30 early, 49 late), and 49 lumbar fractures (29 early, 20 late). There were no differences in injury severity between early and late groups for each fracture site. The most striking differences occurred in the thoracic fracture group. Early fixation was associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia, a shorter intensive care unit stay, fewer ventilator days, and lower charges. High-risk patients had lower pneumonia rates and less hospital resource utilization with early fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Early spine fracture fixation is safely performed in multiply injured patients. Early fixation is preferred in patients with thoracic spine fractures because it allows earlier mobilization and reduces the incidence of pneumonia. Although delaying fixation in the less severely injured may be convenient for scheduling, it increases hospital resource utilization and patient complications.     

Complications and problems in halo treatment of toddlers: limited ambulation is recommended

Although halo fixation in children aged 3 years or younger is described, no study has reported results in this age group. A retrospective review was conducted among children aged 3 years and younger and treated with halo ring fixation. Thirteen patients were identified, with an average age of 26 months (range, 16-43 months) at halo application. Six patients were treated for trauma, 6 for stabilization after cervical arthrodesis, and 1 for traction for progressive infantile scoliosis. All the children required custom or modified rings and vests. On average, 8 pins (range, 6-12) were used for fixation with torque from 2 to 4 in-lbs. Nine (69%) of the 13 patients had complications including 6 pin infections, 3 falls, and 1 respiratory difficulty. Only 1 child required further surgery. None developed posttreatment skull deformity. Halo ring fixation is safe in children aged 3 years and younger and has a complication rate similar to that in older children. Pin problems can be treated effectively by standard means. Unique to this age group, toddlers may be more prone to falls than older children, and limited ambulation should be recommended.     

Tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine fixation

BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical spine injury may require both anterior cervical spine fusion and tracheostomy, particularly in the setting of associated cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite the close proximity of the two surgical incisions, we postulated that tracheostomy could be safely performed after anterior spine fixation. In addition, we postulated that the severity of motor deficits in patients with cervical spine injury would correlate with the need for tracheostomy. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all adult trauma patients diagnosed with cervical spine fractures or cervical SCI admitted between June 1996 and June 2001 at our university Level I trauma center. Demographic data, severity of neurologic injury based on the classification of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), complications, and use and type of tracheostomy were collected. In the subgroup of patients with unstable cervical spine injury that underwent anterior stabilization and tracheostomy, data regarding timing and technique of these procedures and wound outcomes were also collected. Categorical data were analyzed using chi analysis using Yates correction when appropriate, with p <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: During this time period, 275 adult survivors were diagnosed with cervical spinal cord or bony injury. Forty-five percent of patients with SCI (27 of 60) and 14% of patients without SCI (30 of 215) underwent tracheostomy (p <0.001). Moreover, on the basis of the ASIA classification system, 76% of ASIA A and B patients, 38% of ASIA C patients, 23% of ASIA D patients, and 14% of ASIA E patients were treated with tracheostomy (p <0.001). In the subgroup that underwent both anterior spine fixation and tracheostomy (n=17), the median time interval from spine fixation to airway placement was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-10 days), with 71% of these tracheostomies performed percutaneously. No patient developed a wound infection or nonunion as a consequence of tracheostomy placement, and there were no deaths because of complications of either procedure. CONCLUSION: These data support the safety of tracheostomy insertion 6 to 10 days after anterior cervical spine fixation, particularly in the presence of cervical SCI. The presence of severe motor neurologic deficits was strongly associated with the use of tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine injury. Percutaneous tracheostomy, which is our technique of choice, may be advantageous in this setting by virtue of creating only a small wound. The optimal timing and use of tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine injury requires further study.