Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses

Human auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) were recorded using stimulus rates of 78-95 Hz in normal young subjects, in elderly subjects with relatively normal hearing, and in elderly subjects with sensorineural hearing impairment. Amplitude-intensity functions calculated relative to actual sensory thresholds (sensation level or SL) showed that amplitudes increased as stimulus intensity increased. In the hearing-impaired subjects this increase was more rapid at intensities just above threshold ("electrophysiological recruitment") than at higher intensities where the increase was similar to that seen in normal subjects. The thresholds in dB SL for recognizing an ASSR and the intersubject variability of these thresholds decreased with increasing recording time and were lower in the hearing impaired compared to the normal subjects. After 9.8 minutes of recording, the average ASSR thresholds (and standard deviations) were 12.6 +/- 8.7 in the normal subjects, 12.4 +/- 11.9 dB in the normal elderly, and 3.6 +/- 13.5 dB SL in the hearing-impaired subjects.     

Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss

Objective

Many of the medico-legal patients who claimed compensation may exaggerate hearing loss that varies in degree, nature, and laterality. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) could be used to predict the hearing level of adults, and whether ASSR could become a better testing method than Auditory brainstem response (ABR) in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Methods

This was a prospective study, which was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital. From January to June 2007, 142 subjects (284 ears) with varying degrees of sensori-neural hearing impairment were included in this study. Four commonly used frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) were evaluated. All subjects received pure-tone audiometry, multi-channel ASSR, and ABR tests for threshold measurement. The correlation of pure tone thresholds with ASSR and ABR thresholds were assessed.

Results

Between multi-channel ASSR and pure tone thresholds, a difference of less than 15 dB was found in 71% while a difference of less than 25 dB was found in 89% of patients. The correlation coefficient (r) of multi-channel ASSR and pure tone thresholds were 0.89, 0.95, 0.96, and 0.97 at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. The strength of the relationship increased with increasing frequency. On the other hand, between ABR and pure-tone thresholds, a difference of less than 15 dB was found in 31%; a difference of less than 25 dB was found in 62% of patients. The r correlation value for ABR and pure tone thresholds was 0.83.

Conclusion

ASSR is a more reliable test for the accurate prediction of auditory thresholds than ABR. It can be a powerful and convenient electro-physiologic examination tool for clinically assessing of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.     

Hearing threshold estimation in infants using auditory steady-state responses

Successful early intervention in children with permanent hearing loss requires assessment techniques that can accurately reflect the behavioral audiogram in infancy. This retrospective study compared auditory steady-state response (ASSR) findings from subjects tested in the first three months of life with subsequently obtained behavioral hearing levels. ASSR audiograms were established using amplitude and frequency modulated tones at octave frequencies (500 Hz to 4 kHz). Results obtained from 575 subjects including 285 with normal hearing, 271 with sensorineural hearing loss, and 19 with auditory neuropathy-type hearing loss are presented. ASSR and behavioral hearing thresholds for subjects in the normal and sensorineural groups were highly correlated, with Pearson r values exceeding 0.95 at each of the test frequencies. In contrast, ASSR thresholds in children with AN-type hearing loss did not accurately reflect the behavioral audiogram. Overall, the findings indicate that ASSR testing can offer useful insights into the hearing acuity of children tested in infancy.     

Effects of audiometric configuration on the auditory brain stem response

Evidence reported in the literature indicates that wave I of the auditory brain stem response is influenced by cochlear contributions from a more basal area of the cochlea than is wave V. This phenomenon is invoked to explain different latency-intensity function patterns of waves I and V and the I-V interval for four types of cochlear hearing loss. In high frequency hearing losses wave V is delayed at low intensities. Wave I tends to be delayed at all intensities and by a greater amount than wave V. The I-V interval is often reduced with the effect maximal at higher intensities. Low frequency hearing losses tend to cause early wave V latencies at low intensities. Wave I latencies are normal. The I-V interval is therefore reduced at lower intensities. Flat hearing losses produce normal latency-intensity functions. High frequency notched audiograms are almost always associated with delayed wave V but early wave I latencies. The I-V interval is therefore significantly prolonged with the effect maximal at low intensities. The variability of the I-V interval as a function of audiometric configuration indicates that it is not a pure measure of central conduction time.     

Human auditory steady-state responses

Steady-state evoked potentials can be recorded from the human scalp in response to auditory stimuli presented at rates between 1 and 200 Hz or by periodic modulations of the amplitude and/or frequency of a continuous tone. Responses can be objectively detected using frequency-based analyses. In waking subjects, the responses are particularly prominent at rates near 40 Hz. Responses evoked by more rapidly presented stimuli are less affected by changes in arousal and can be evoked by multiple simultaneous stimuli without significant loss of amplitude. Response amplitude increases as the depth of modulation or the intensity increases. The phase delay of the response increases as the intensity or the carrier frequency decreases. Auditory steady-state responses are generated throughout the auditory nervous system, with cortical regions contributing more than brainstem generators to responses at lower modulation frequencies. These responses are useful for objectively evaluating auditory thresholds, assessing suprathreshold hearing, and monitoring the state of arousal during anesthesia.     

Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate, in hearing-impaired participants who could not hear the stimuli, the possibility of artifactual auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) when stimuli are presented at high intensities. DESIGN: ASSRs to single (60 dB HL) and multiple (20 to 50 dB HL; 500 to 4000 Hz) bone-conduction stimuli as well as single 114 to 120 dB HL air-conduction stimuli, were obtained using the Rotman MASTER system, using analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion rates of 500, 1000, and 1250 Hz. Responses (p < 0.05) were considered artifactual when their numbers exceeded that expected by chance. In some conditions, we also obtained ASSRs to "alternated" stimuli (stimuli inverted and ASSRs to the two polarities averaged). A total of 17 subjects were tested. RESULTS: Bone conduction results: 500 Hz A/D rate: Large-amplitude (43 to 1558 nV) artifactual ASSRs were seen at 40 and 50 dB HL for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. Smaller responses (28 to 53 nV) were also recorded at 20 dB HL for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. Artifactual ASSRs (17 to 62 nV) were seen at 40 dB HL and above for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency and at 50 dB HL for the 2000 Hz carrier frequency. Alternating the stimulus polarity decreased the amplitude and occurrence of these artifactual responses but did not eliminate responses for the 500 Hz carrier frequency at 40 dB HL and above. No artifactual responses were recorded for 4000 Hz stimuli for any condition. 1000 Hz A/D rate: Artifactual ASSRs (15 to 523 nV) were seen at 50 dB HL and above for the 500 Hz carrier frequency and 40 dB HL and above for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency. Artifactual responses were also obtained at 50 dB HL for a 2000 Hz carrier frequency but not at lower levels. Artifactual responses were not seen for the 4000 Hz carrier frequency. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed the responses for the 1000 and 2000 Hz carrier frequencies but did not change the results for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. 1250 Hz A/D rate: Artifactual ASSRs (16 to 220 nV) were seen at 50 dB HL and above for the 500 Hz carrier frequency and 60 dB HL and above for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed the responses for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency but did not change the results for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. There were no artifactual responses at 2000 and 4000 Hz. Air conduction results: 500 Hz A/D rate: Artifactual ASSRs (49 to 153 nV) were seen for 114 to 120 dB HL stimuli for 500 and 1000 Hz carrier frequencies. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed these responses. There were no artifactual responses at 2000 and 4000 Hz. 1000 and 1250 Hz A/D rates: Artifactual ASSRs (19 to 55 nV) were seen for a 120 dB HL stimulus for a 1000 Hz carrier. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed these responses. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity air- or bone-conduction stimuli can produce spurious ASSRs, especially for 500 and 1000 Hz carrier frequencies. High-amplitude stimulus artifact can result in energy that is aliased to exactly the modulation frequency. Choice of signal conditioning (electroencephalogram filter slope and low-pass cutoff) and processing (A/D rate) can avoid spurious responses due to aliasing. However, artifactual responses due to other causes may still occur for bone-conduction stimuli 50 dB HL and higher (and possibly for high-level air conduction). Because the phases of these spurious responses do not invert with inversion of stimulus, the possibility of nonauditory physiologic responses cannot be ruled out. The clinical implications of these results are that artifactual responses may occur for any patient for bone-conduction stimuli at levels greater than 40 dB HL and for high-intensity air-conduction stimuli used to assess patients with profound hearing loss.     

Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies

OBJECTIVE: To follow the development of tone-burst auditory brainstem response (TB-ABR) and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds in a group of normal babies through the first 6 wk of life. DESIGN: This longitudinal study involved assessment at four data-collection points. TB-ABR and ASSR thresholds to 500-Hz and 4-kHz stimuli were established in 17 full-term subjects at 0, 2, 4, and 6 wk of age. Stimulus-modulation rates for ASSR assessment were 74 Hz (for 500-Hz tones) and 95 Hz (for 4-kHz tones). TB-ABR responses were recorded to stimuli presented at 39.1 Hz. RESULTS: Mean ASSR thresholds (calibrated in dBHL) at 500 Hz ranged from 44.4 to 39.7 dB HL across the recording period, and at 4 kHz they ranged from 37.9 to 32.1 dB HL. TB-ABR thresholds (calibrated in dBnHL) were significantly lower, ranging from 36.8 to 36.2 dB nHL at 500 Hz and from 16.5 to 15.9 dB nHL at 4 kHz. However, when the stimuli used for each test were calibrated in the same units (peak equivalent dB SPL), the results were similar. That is, the differences between the two techniques were only an artifact of the calibration. ASSR thresholds were more variable than TB-ABR, particularly at the neonatal measurement point. Within-subject changes across the test period were observed for ASSR thresholds but not for TB-ABR. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal findings presented in this study suggest that for normal neonates, the TB-ABR technique may offer a more reliable basis for prediction of hearing levels than ASSR assessment. This is not because TB-ABR thresholds (calibrated in dBnHL) are lower, but because the response is less affected by maturational development in the first weeks of life and is less variable across subjects.     

Aided auditory steady-state responses in infants

Infants with hearing loss routinely receive hearing aids several months before reliable behavioral responses to amplified sound can be observed. This necessitates objective measures to validate hearing-aid fittings. A single report has demonstrated the use of ASSRs to determine aided thresholds in children but data in young infants is still lacking. The current study explored aided ASSR compared to unaided ASSR thresholds and subsequent behavioral thresholds in a group of six young infants with hearing loss who received hearing aids between three and six months of age. Aided ASSR thresholds were obtained in 83% of frequencies where aided behavioral thresholds were obtained, with a mean threshold difference of 13±13 dB. The aided ASSR-based threshold estimates were within 15 dB of behavioral thresholds in 63% of cases, indicating a moderate correlation (r = 0.55). Comparing aided and unaided ASSR measurements revealed an average functional gain of 36±15 dB. These results indicate that ASSRs can provide the first evidence of robust hearing aid benefit in young infants several months before behavioral responses are observed.     

Aided auditory steady-state responses in infants

Infants with hearing loss routinely receive hearing aids several months before reliable behavioral responses to amplified sound can be observed. This necessitates objective measures to validate hearing-aid fittings. A single report has demonstrated the use of ASSRs to determine aided thresholds in children but data in young infants is still lacking. The current study explored aided ASSR compared to unaided ASSR thresholds and subsequent behavioral thresholds in a group of six young infants with hearing loss who received hearing aids between three and six months of age. Aided ASSR thresholds were obtained in 83% of frequencies where aided behavioral thresholds were obtained, with a mean threshold difference of 13+/-13 dB. The aided ASSR-based threshold estimates were within 15 dB of behavioral thresholds in 63% of cases, indicating a moderate correlation (r = 0.55). Comparing aided and unaided ASSR measurements revealed an average functional gain of 36+/-15 dB. These results indicate that ASSRs can provide the first evidence of robust hearing aid benefit in young infants several months before behavioral responses are observed.     

听性稳态反应与听性脑干反应阈值的比较

目的:通过比较同一组聋儿听性脑干反应(ABR)和听性稳态反应(ASSR)的反应阈值,对ASSR的临床应用价值作出评价。方法:分别记录65例年龄在2.5个月~5.5岁聋儿的ABR及ASSR结果并进行比较及相关分析。结果:本组聋儿ABR反应阈值左右耳分别为(85.82±12.39)和(82.70±14.93)dB nHL;ASSR 4个测试频率的反应阈值左耳为(86.91±16.70)(、90.32±16.11)、(91.02±16.58)、(89.80±17.08)dB HL,右耳为(85.15±18.16)(、89.32±17.76)(、90.41±18.87)(、85.15±17.03)dB HL。ASSR 4个测试频率的反应阈值与ABR结果的相关系数分别为左耳0.622、0.721、0.757、0.714和右耳0.613、0.732、0.795、0.739。结论:ASSR与ABR测试结果有显著的相关性,而ASSR所获得的是分频资料,因此这种测试方法有较高的临床应用价值。     

成人感音神经性聋的听觉稳态反应反应阈与纯音听阈

目的探讨成人感音神经性聋的听觉稳态反应（auditory steady-state responses,ASSR）反应阈与纯音听阈的关系。方法选择中国医科大学附属一院耳鼻咽喉科门诊感音神经性聋的成人患者,分别进行纯音听力测试、ASSR检查,比较ASSR在0.5、1、2、4 kHz频率处的反应阈与纯音听阈的相关性及按听力损失程度比较两者的差值。结果 ASSR反应阈与纯音听阈在各频率处的相关系数分别为0.840、0.905、0.886、0.924;随着感音神经性听力损失的加重二者的差值明显缩小。随着频率的增加,两者的差值明显缩小。结论成人感音神经性聋ASSR反应阈与纯音听阈有显著相关性,随着听力损失的加重,ASSR反应阈愈接近纯音听阈,ASSR作为成人感音神经性聋听力定量诊断的客观方法有很大的临床应用价值。     

Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects

This study evaluated the use of multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to estimate the growth of loudness in listeners with normal hearing. Individual intensity functions were obtained from measures of loudness growth using the contour test and from the electrophysiological amplitude measures of multiple amplitude-modulated (77–105Hz) tones (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000Hz) simultaneously presented to both ears and recorded over the scalp. Slope analyses for the behavioural and electrophysiological intensity functions were separately performed. Response amplitudes of the ASSRs and loudness sensation judgements increase as the stimulus intensity increases for the four frequencies studied. A significant relationship was obtained between loudness and the ASSRs. The results of this study suggest that the amplitude of the ASSRs may be used to estimate loudness growth at least for individuals with normal hearing.     

Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects

This study evaluated the use of multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to estimate the growth of loudness in listeners with normal hearing. Individual intensity functions were obtained from measures of loudness growth using the contour test and from the electrophysiological amplitude measures of multiple amplitude-modulated (77-105 Hz) tones (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) simultaneously presented to both ears and recorded over the scalp. Slope analyses for the behavioural and electrophysiological intensity functions were separately performed. Response amplitudes of the ASSRs and loudness sensation judgements increase as the stimulus intensity increases for the four frequencies studied. A significant relationship was obtained between loudness and the ASSRs. The results of this study suggest that the amplitude of the ASSRs may be used to estimate loudness growth at least for individuals with normal hearing.     

Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses

OBJECTIVE: To compare the magnitudes of the steady-state responses evoked by several types of stimuli, and the times required to recognize these responses as significant. DESIGN: In the first two experiments, we examined auditory steady-state responses to pure tones, broadband noise and band-limited noise. The stimuli were amplitude modulated in the 75 to 100 Hz range with sinusoidal or exponential envelopes. A third experiment investigated the effects of exponential envelopes on the responses to broadband noise. The final experiment examined auditory steady-state responses evoked by rapidly presented transient stimuli, such as clicks, brief tones and brief noise-bursts. All stimuli were presented dichotically at intensities 30 to 50 dB above behavioral thresholds. The subjects were adults, who drowsed or slept during the recording sessions. RESULTS: The responses to the noise were larger than the responses to the tones. At an intensity of 32 dB nHL, the average amount of time needed to obtain significant responses for the amplitude-modulated noise was 43 sec and the maximum time was 2 minutes. The average time for pure tone stimuli was approximately 2 minutes but 25% of the responses remained undetected after 5 minutes. Combining the responses to all the frequency-specific stimuli showed results similar to using noise stimuli. Using exponential envelopes did not increase response amplitudes for noise stimuli. At 45 dB nHL, the steady-state responses to clicks and other transient stimuli were larger than responses to the broadband noise. The average time to detect steady-state responses to transient stimuli was approximately 20 sec, which was a little faster than for amplitude modulated noise. CONCLUSIONS: Auditory steady-state potentials evoked by amplitude modulated noise or transient stimuli might be useful in providing rapid and objective tests of hearing during screening procedures. Another approach might be to record responses to multiple frequency-specific stimuli and to evaluate the combined responses for a rapid indication that some hearing is present.     

Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the auditory steady-state responses evoked by amplitude-modulated (AM), mixed-modulated (MM), exponentially-modulated (AM2), and frequency-modulated (FM) tones in 50 newborn infants (within 3 days of birth) and in 20 older infants (within 3-15 wk of birth). Our hypothesis was that MM and AM2 tonal stimuli would evoke larger responses than either the AM or FM tones, and that this increased size would make the responses more readily detectable. DESIGN: Multiple auditory steady-state responses were recorded to four tonal stimuli presented simultaneously to each ear at 50 dB SPL. The carrier frequencies of the stimuli were 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz and the modulation rates were between 78 and 95 Hz. Recordings lasting 12 minutes were obtained for each of the three types of modulation: 100% AM, MM (100% AM and 20% FM) and AM2. In six infants, responses to 20% FM were also recorded. RESULTS: In newborn infants, MM and AM2 stimuli produced responses that were on average 15% larger than AM stimuli. For AM, MM, and AM2 stimuli, the percentage of significant responses was 67%, 73%, 76%, respectively. Responses to FM stimuli were clearly evident in newborn infants and were about half the amplitude of the AM responses. Responses recorded in the older infants were 17% larger when evoked by MM and AM2 stimuli, rather than AM stimuli. Responses in the older infants were, on average, 32% larger and showed a higher incidence of significant responses than for infants in the first 3 days of life. For AM, MM, and AM2 stimuli, the percentage of significant responses was 82%, 82%, 84%, respectively. In both newborn and older infants, the overall percentage of significant responses was decreased by the 500 Hz results, which showed lower amplitudes and were less frequently detected than responses evoked by other frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The responses to MM and AM2 tones were larger than those evoked by AM tones. Using these stimuli will increase the reliability and efficiency of evoked potential audiometry in infancy. Responses at 50 dB SPL are more easily detected at 3-15 wk of age than in the first few days after birth. Comprehensive frequency-specific testing of hearing using steady-state responses will likely be more accurate if postponed until after the immediate neonatal period.     

Estimating air-bone gaps using auditory steady-state responses

Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) were recorded using stimuli presented both via air conduction (AC ASSR) and bone conduction (BC ASSR) in 10 normal-hearing subjects with different degrees of simulated conductive hearing losses. The ASSR-estimated ABG (air-bone gap) was compared with the ABG measured using traditional pure-tone audiometric procedures. Reproducibility of the BC ASSR electrophysiological thresholds was also assessed. Additionally, a group of five subjects with profound sensorineural hearing loss was used to establish stimulation levels in which the BC ASSR was contaminated by stimulus artifact. Results of this investigation showed that the ASSR and behavioral ABGs were strongly correlated with each other (r = .81). However, ASSR-estimated ABGs slightly overestimated the magnitude of the behavioral. Reproducibility of the BC ASSR electrophysiological thresholds was good. Data from the five subjects with profound hearing loss, however, demonstrated that the levels where stimulus artifact became problematic were relatively low. This means BC stimulation may be appropriate only for subjects with normal or mildly impaired cochlear sensitivity.     

2035例婴儿听性脑干反应与多频稳态反应阈值的比较

目的 探讨婴儿听性脑干反应(auditorybrainstem response,ABR)与多频稳态反应(auditorysteady-state response,ASSR)的关系.方法 对2035例婴儿进行ABR和ASSR检测,结果采用SPSS 17.0进行相关分析、t检验和直线回归分析.结果 ①ABR反应阈与ASSR不同频率反应阈值的相关系数为0.732～0.915 (P＜0.05).②在t检验中,ABR反应阈值与ASSR 4 kHz反应阈值差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),其余比较差异均有意义(P＜0.05).③ABR预测ASSR0.5、1、2、4 kHz、高频均值、均值的回归方程分别为:y=0.979x-6.921,y=0.909x-1.705,y=0.948x-3.647,y=1.117x-5.113,y=1.033x-4.380,y=0.988x-4.346.结论 婴儿ABR与ASSR反应阈值具有较好的相关性,其主要是反映ASSR 4 kHz的反应阈值.     

Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses

Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) to amplitude modulated (AM) tones with carrier frequencies between 250 and 4000 Hz and modulation frequencies near 40 Hz were recorded using a 37-channel neuro-magnetometer placed above the auditory cortex contralateral to the stimulated right ear. The ASSR sources were likely in the primary auditory cortex, located more anteriorly and more medially than the N1m sources. The ASSR amplitude decreased with increasing carrier frequency, the amplitude at 250 Hz being three times larger than at 4000 Hz. The amplitude of the ASSR to a test sound decreased in the presence of an interfering second AM sound. This suppression of the ASSR to the test stimulus was greater when the carrier frequency of the interfering stimulus was higher than that of the test tone and was greater when the test stimulus had a lower carrier frequency. Similar frequency specificity was observed when the interfering sound was a non-modulated pure tone. These results differ from those found for the ASSR elicited by modulation frequencies above 80 Hz or for the transient brainstem and middle-latency responses and suggest substantial interactions between phase-locked activities at the level of the primary auditory cortex.     

Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity

OBJECTIVE: To record steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones that change their intensity over time and to see how well behavioral thresholds can be estimated from such responses. DESIGN: The intensity of the stimuli used in this experiment increased from 25 to 75 dB SPL for 8 sec and then decreased back to 25 dB HL during the subsequent 8 sec. Responses to this intensity sweep were averaged and then analyzed using a short-time Fast-Fourier Transform to measure how the amplitude and phase of the responses changed with intensity. One experimental condition presented single 2-kHz tones to the left ear; a second condition examined the use of simultaneously presented multiple tones (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) to the left ear; a third condition used multiple tones presented dichotically; and a fourth condition presented the multiple dichotic tones in masking noise to simulate either low-frequency (less than 1400 Hz) or high-frequency (greater than 1400 Hz) hearing loss. Physiological thresholds were determined using six different algorithms and the relations between physiological and behavioral thresholds were evaluated to see how well behavioral thresholds could be estimated. RESULTS: The amplitude-intensity functions for the 1 and 2 kHz responses both demonstrated a plateau at higher intensities in the multiple-stimulus conditions but not in the single-stimulus condition. The slope of the amplitude-intensity functions varied significantly with the carrier frequency of the stimulus: 1.30 at 500 Hz, 0.87 at 1000 Hz, 0.75 at 2000 Hz, and 1.40 at 4000 Hz. The slope of the phase-intensity function averaged 1.16 degrees per dB and did not vary with carrier frequency. Estimates of latency, however, indicated that latency increased with decreasing carrier frequency and with decreasing intensity. The performance of the threshold estimating algorithms differed between normal hearing and simulated hearing loss, since the amplitude- and phase-intensity functions in the latter condition were not linear. Physiological-behavioral threshold differences were generally greater for normal hearing than for simulated hearing loss. Linear regression provided the least physiological-behavioral difference but was quite variable during simulated hearing loss. Simply defining threshold as the lowest intensity above which all responses were significantly different from residual EEG noise was the most accurate method in terms of yielding the least standard deviation of the physiological-behavioral difference with an average standard deviation of 10 dB, provided EEG noise levels were low enough in the normal hearing condition. CONCLUSIONS: Thresholds can be estimated using intensity sweeps with about the same accuracy as recording separate responses to discrete intensities. Sweep recordings provide additional information about the responses at suprathreshold intensities by clearly determining amplitude- and phase- intensity functions at these intensities.