Immunogenicity of two paediatric doses of monovalent hepatitis B or combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in 8-10-year-old children

Hepatitis A and B vaccines are highly immunogenic in three-dose schedules. To obtain an equivalent result in children with two paediatric doses would be of significant benefit. The purpose of this study was to measure the immunogenicity of a two-dose schedule in children with two licensed recombinant HBsAg containing vaccines given at paediatric doses, one of them combined with hepatitis A. Seven-hundred and four healthy school children aged 8-10 years were recruited in an open label study to receive either Twinrix Pediatric (360 El.U HAV antigen; 10 microg HBsAg) or Recombivax (2.5 microg HBsAg) vaccine intramuscularly 6 months apart. The seroconversion (>/=1 mIU/ml for anti-HBs antibodies and >/=33 mIU/ml for anti-HAV antibodies), seroprotection (anti-HBs >/=10 mIU/ml) rates and the geometric mean titers (GMTs) were determined 4-8 weeks after the second dose. The anti-HBs seroconversion rate was 97.1% with Twinrix and 97.2% with Recombivax. The seroprotection rates were 96.5 and 94.4%, respectively (P = 0.17). The GMT was higher with Twinrix than with Recombivax (3248 mIU/ml versus 742 mIU/ml, P < 0.0001). All the children vaccinated with Twinrix seroconverted to HAV and the GMT was 5168 mIU/ml. The obtained results suggest that two paediatric doses of hepatitis vaccines are highly immunogenic in 8-10-year-old children. This schedule could facilitate a greater vaccine acceptance and the addition of hepatitis A vaccine to existing adolescent universal hepatitis B virus immunization programs.     

Long term (24 months) follow-up of a hepatitis A and B vaccine,comparing a two and three dose schedule in adolescents aged 12-15 years

BACKGROUND: A two dose schedule (0 and 6 months) for a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine is currently being developed. METHODS: The present study compared the combined hepatitis A and B vaccines in 12-15-year-old: Twinrix paediatric (360 EL.U HAV antigen/10 microg HBs antigen) on a three dose schedule (0, 1 and 6 months) to the adult formulation (720 EL.U HAV antigen/20 microg HBs antigen) on a two dose schedule (0 and 6 months) and also reports on the follow-up until 24 months. RESULTS: Seroconversion (SC) rates to HAV in both regimens reached 100% by month 7 and remained 100% up to month 24. Anti-HAV, GMTs were slightly higher for the two dose than the three dose regimens at this time point. Seroprotection against hepatitis B was >99% in both groups by month 7 and 24, this was still 94 and 96%, respectively. Statistical non-inferiority of group 1 (two dose) versus group 2 (three dose) was demonstrated. All vaccines were well tolerated and the most frequently reported local and general symptoms were pain and fatigue. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events reported during the study. CONCLUSION: The two dose regimen elicited similar immunogenicity to HAV and HBsAg and reactogenicity profiles as the three dose regimen in this group of healthy adolescents. The reduction in the number of doses from the current three dose schedule will make vaccination against hepatitis A and B more convenient to the vaccinee, reduce healthcare staff time required and may lower the overall costs associated with vaccination.     

A two-dose schedule for combined hepatitis A and B vaccination in children aged 6-15 years

A combined hepatitis A and B vaccine, Twinrix, in a paediatric formulation for ages 1-15 years and in an adult formulation for those ages 16 years and older, became commercially available in Turkey as well as in many countries. It is administered according to a three-dose schedule (0, 1 and 6 months). A reduction in the number of doses would improve the compliance rate and reduce administration costs. Therefore, we planned a trial evaluation of the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity profile of a high-dose combined hepatitis A and B vaccine, administered in two doses, compared with the profile of a paediatric-dose combined vaccine, administered in three doses, in healthy children aged 6-15 years. One hundred children were randomly attributed to the two study groups. The first group (paediatric-dose vaccine group) received the licensed Twinrix Paediatric, at months 0, 1 and 6; the second group (high-dose vaccine group) received the high-dose vaccine, following a 0, 6 months schedule. The reactogenicity was assessed after each vaccine dose. The immunogenicity was evaluated by testing for anti-HBs and anti-HAV antibodies. Seroconversion rates and geometric mean titres (GMTs) were compared. Both formulations of the combined vaccine were well tolerated. The high-dose combined vaccine administered in two doses, elicits satisfactory immunogenicity profiles, similar to those elicited by the paediatric vaccine administered in three doses. On completion of the vaccination schedule in the two groups all children were protected against hepatitis B and immune for hepatitis A. Anti-HAV GMTs after completion of the vaccination schedule were 7163 mlU/ml in the paediatric-dose group, 8241 mlU/ml in the high-dose group; anti-HBs GMTs were 8679 and 4583 mlU/ml, respectively. These results indicate that a two-dose schedule, compared with the standard three-dose schedule, offers fewer injections for satisfactory protection against the two infections. This means fewer clinic visits, lower administration costs, better compliance, and higher coverage rate. Therefore, this two-dose schedule can be considered an appropriate regimen for the immunization of children and adolescents against hepatitis A and B infection, in the context of school-based immunization programmes.     

Combining hepatitis A and B vaccination in children and adolescents

Hepatitis A and B are common infections worldwide and their severity is related to the individual's age upon initial infection. Furthermore, when hepatitis B infection occurs in infants, the risk of becoming a chronic carrier is 90%. For hepatitis A, the lower incidence of disease arising from an improvement in living conditions leaves a greater number of children, adolescents and young adults susceptible to residual circulating virus. Consequently, initial infection occurs later in life when clinical illness is more frequent and the rate of morbidity and mortality higher. Although both viruses differ greatly, including their modes of transmission, the overlap in their epidemiology warrants the combination of hepatitis A and B vaccination. The immune response elicited by the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine following a three-dose schedule compares well with the anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) and anti-hepatitis B sero-responses obtained with monovalent vaccines. In addition, it was shown that the seroprotection rate for anti-hepatitis B increased more rapidly with the administration of the combined vaccine, with values of more than 80% within 1 month after the first two doses (schedule, 0, 1 and 6 months). Currently, according to the World Health Organization recommendations, more than 116 countries are vaccinating their infants and/or adolescents against hepatitis B. Recently, several countries were considering or have decided to begin mass vaccination against HAV (more than fifteen states in the US, Spain (Catalonia), Italy (Puglia)). For these countries, the combination of hepatitis A and B antigens in one single vaccine offers the following advantages: fewer injections for protection against two infections, better compliance, lower implementation costs, and fewer missed vaccination opportunities. Further simplification of the schedule, by reducing the number of doses, would improve the compliance rate as well as being more convenient for the vaccinee. This should translate into a reduction in costs associated with vaccine administration. In some recent vaccine studies, the immunogenicity and safety profile of a two-dose schedule (0 and 6 months) of the adult formulation of the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine was investigated in children aged 1-11 years, as well as in adolescents aged 12-15 years. Current results indicate that this two-dose schedule of the adult formulation could be considered a viable alternative for immunization of children and adolescents.     

Immune response of HLA DQ2 positive subjects,vaccinated with HBsAg/AS04, a hepatitis B vaccine with a novel adjuvant

About 5-10% of the general adult population respond inadequately to hepatitis B vaccination. The histocompatibility leucocyte antigen (HLA) DQ2, DR3 and DR7 phenotypes have been linked with non-responsiveness to hepatitis B vaccination. A first part of our study determined the prevalence of the HLA DQ2 allele in a healthy population, aged 15-50 years. We found 35% of our study population (n=1008) positive for the HLA DQ2 allele. Positive subjects for HLA DQ2 were subsequently invited to participate in a trial and were to be given either the HBsAg/AS04 hepatitis B vaccine or a licensed hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B).(1) Both contained 20 microg of recombinant HBsAg. The HBsAg/AS04 vaccine was administered on a 0 and 6 months schedule whilst the comparator vaccine was given according to the standard 0, 1 and 6 months schedule. The experimental vaccine was formulated on a novel adjuvant containing 3' deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (3D-MPL) and alum. A total of 230 subjects were enrolled into the vaccination study. At month 7, 99% of the subjects had a protective titre (>or=10mIU/ml) with a geometric mean titre (GMT) of 6613mIU/ml in the group receiving HBsAg/AS04 versus 97% seroprotected with a GMT of 2315mIU/ml in the other group. Both vaccines, with their respective schedule, give very high seroprotection rates (>96%). Our data suggest that HLA DQ2 positivity is not a good marker for non- or poor-responsiveness. The HBsAg/AS04 vaccine was more reactogenic mainly because of an increased local reactogenicity. Both vaccines, especially HBsAg/AS04, are highly immunogenic and well tolerated by the study subjects.     

Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of two-dose versus three-dose (standard care) hepatitis B immunisation of healthy adolescents aged 11-15 years: a randomised controlled trial

This trial assessed the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of a two-dose hepatitis B immunisation regimen (thiomersal-free Engerix-B 20 microg HBsAg doses 6 months apart) compared to the standard three-dose vaccination regimen (preservative-free Engerix-B 10 microg HBsAg doses, 0, 1, 6 month dose schedule) in healthy adolescents aged 11-15 years. Subjects were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to one of the two regimens (258 to the two-dose [20 microg] and 126 to the three-dose [10 microg] regimen) (Study ID 103860/280). One month after the final vaccine dose, the seroprotection (anti-HBs >or=10mIU/ml) rate in the two-dose (20 microg) group (233/241 individuals -96.7% seroprotected) was non-inferior to the seroprotection rate in the three-dose (10 microg) group (111/113 individuals -98.2% seroprotected). Both regimens were shown to be safe and well tolerated. Two doses of Engerix-B (20 microg HBsAg) could be considered as an alternative to standard three-dose Engerix-B (10 microg HBsAg) immunisation for adolescents aged 11-15 years.     

One or two doses of hepatitis A vaccine in universal vaccination programs in children in 2020: A systematic review

BackgroundHepatitis A virus (HAV) is a global health concern as outbreaks continue to occur. Since 1999, several countries have introduced universal vaccination (UV) of children against HAV according to approved two-dose schedules. Other countries have implemented one-dose UV programs since 2005; the long-term impact of this schedule is not yet known.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases for data published between January 2000 and July 2019 to assess evidence for one-dose and two-dose UV of children with non-live HAV vaccines and describe their global impact on incidence, mortality, and severity of hepatitis A, vaccine effectiveness, vaccine efficacy, and antibody persistence.ResultsOf 3739 records screened, 33 peer-reviewed articles and one conference abstract were included. Rapid declines in incidence of hepatitis A and related outcomes were observed in all age groups post-introduction of UV programs, which persisted for at least 14 years for two-dose and six years for one-dose programs according to respective study durations. Vaccine effectiveness was ≥95% over 3–5 years for two-dose programs. Vaccine efficacy was >98% over 0.1–7.5 years for one-dose vaccination. Antibody persistence in vaccinated individuals was documented for up to 15 years (≥90%) and ten years (≥74%) for two-dose and one-dose schedules, respectively.ConclusionExperience with two-dose UV of children against HAV is extensive, demonstrating an impact on the incidence of hepatitis A and antibody persistence for at least 15 years in many countries globally. Because evidence is more limited for one-dose UV, we were unable to draw conclusions on immune response persistence beyond ten years or the need for booster doses later in life. Ongoing epidemiological monitoring is essential in countries implementing one-dose UV against HAV. Based on current evidence, two doses of non-live HAV vaccines are needed to ensure long-term protection.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a combined vaccine against hepatitis A and B in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are a group at risk of disease exacerbation or relapse of the underlying disease should they fall ill with infectious hepatitis A (HAV) or B (HBV). Therefore, it seems appropriate to protect this group of persons against HAV and HBV disease by vaccination. An open study evaluated the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a combined HAV and HBV vaccine in 10 patients with AIH (6 patients aged 1-15 years and four patients aged 16+ years). The vaccine was administered using a three-dose vaccination schedule (0, 1 and 6 months). The vaccine course was well tolerated, safe and did not aggravate the clinical course of the underlying disease. Patients responded with 100% seroconversion for antibody to the HAV vaccine component and geometric mean antibody concentration (GIVIC) comparable to healthy cohorts. Response to the HBV component antigen was comparable to previous reports of HBV vaccination in immune compromised individuals with lower GMC than observed in healthy populations. One month after the third vaccine dose (month 7), all six vaccinees in the 1-15 years age group developed protective levels of anti-HBs as compared to two of the four vaccinees in the 16+ years age group.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in young adults

The combination of hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccinations can offer convenience, increased compliance and cost saving. We have studied the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of combined hepatitis A and B vaccination in young adults (16-35 years old). Eighty healthy young adults were divided into two random groups. One group received the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (HAB) in one arm while the other group was administered concomitant hepatitis A and B vaccines (HAV + HBV) in the right and left arms, respectively. The immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety were assessed after each dose in both the groups. In local symptoms, the percentage of the combined HAB group was lower than the HAV + HBV group, and the general symptoms were noted in approximately 30% of each group without any significant difference. No serious adverse effects were noted. All the subjects were seropositive for antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) after one dose of vaccine, and remained seropositive after three doses in both groups. The seropositive rate for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) was significantly higher (84%) in the combined HAB group than the concomitant HAV + HBV group (62%), (p<0.05) after dose two, and all the subjects were seropositive (100%) after the third dose. The GMTs of anti-HAV and anti-HBs were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (p>0.1) except in month 6 when the GMT of anti-HBs was higher in HAB group (p=0.0039). The combined HAB vaccine was found to be safe, well tolerated and had less local symptoms in young adults. The immunogenicity and reactogenicity were similar to the concomitant HAV + HBV vaccines.     

甲、乙型肝炎联合疫苗在儿童中0、6月程序接种的安全性和免疫原性研究

目的 观察和评价在儿童中接种2剂倍尔来福~(TM)甲、乙型肝炎(分别简称为甲肝、乙肝)联合疫苗的安全性及免疫原性.方法 本研究以江苏省常州市116名1～10岁完成乙肝疫苗全程免疫同时无甲肝疫苗接种史的抗甲肝病毒抗体(anti-hepatitis A virus,抗-HAV)阴性儿童为研究对象,按0、6个月程序接种甲、乙肝联合疫苗(倍尔来福~(TM)).每剂疫苗0.5 ml,含HAV抗原250 U和乙肝表面抗原5μg.观察接种疫苗后72 h内局部反应和全身反应,检测免疫后1、6、7个月的血清抗-HAV阳转率、乙肝病毒表面抗体(抗-HBs)保护率及抗体滴度.结果 倍尔来福~(TM)接种后局部和全身不良反应发生率分别为12.1%(14/116)和6.0%(7/116),其中局部不良反应以注射部位红、肿、硬结为主,占6.9%(8/116)～11.2%(13/116),全身不良反应发生率为6.0%(7/116),以发热为主.免疫后1、6、7个月,抗.HAV阳转率为92.9%(92/99)～100.0%(101/101),抗体几何平均滴度(GMT)为47.0～2762.3 mIU/ml;疫苗免疫前抗-HBs阳性保护率为86.1%(87/101),免疫后1个月达到100.0%(101/101),免疫后1、6、7个月抗-HBs GMT为894.3～3314.3 mlU/ml.结论 倍尔来福~(TM)甲、乙肝联合疫苗2剂接种程序在乙肝基础免疫儿童中应用具有良好的安全性和免疫原性.     

国产甲型肝炎灭活疫苗在低龄儿童中应用的安全性和免疫原性研究

目的 探讨国产甲型肝炎灭活疫苗在低龄儿童（1－4岁）中应用的安全性和免疫原性。方法 选1－4岁易感健康儿童63名，随机分为两组，按0，3和0，6程序接种国产甲肝灭活疫苗500U／剂，观察免疫后的局部和全身反应，并检测初免后及全程免疫后的抗－HAV阳转率和抗体GMT。结果 初免和加强免疫后有轻微的过性局部和全身反应，未见肝功异常。初免后1、3、6个月抗体阳转率分别为85.7%、88.5%和83.8%；抗体GMT玢别为182mU/ml、225mU/ml和252mU/ml；0，3和0，6程序全程免疫后1个月抗体阳转率均为100％；抗体GMT分别为2718mU/ml和4683mU/ml。结论 国产甲肝灭活疫苗在低龄儿童中应用具有良好的安全性和免疫原性；接种两剂可获高滴度甲肝抗体；0，6程序优于0，3程序。     

A prospective, randomized, comparative US trial of a combination hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix) with corresponding monovalent vaccines (Havrix and Engerix-B) in adults

In an open, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in the US, 773 adults were administered either a combination hepatitis vaccine (Twinrix: 720 EL.U inactivated hepatitis A antigen and 20 mcg recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen per milliliter) on a 0, 1, 6 month schedule or corresponding monovalent vaccines concurrently (Havrix, 1440 EL.U/ml of hepatitis A antigen at 0, 6 months and Engerix-B, 20 mcg of hepatitis B surface antigen at 0, 1, 6 months). Non-inferiority testing for the primary endpoint, severe soreness, and equivalence testing for the secondary endpoints, anti-HAV seroconversion and anti-HBs seroprotection, showed that safety and immunogenicity were comparable in the two groups.     

国产甲型肝炎灭活疫苗的安全性与免疫原性初步观察

目的 评价国产甲型肝炎灭活疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。方法 对健康易感儿童1％名和成人206名随机分为4组，107名儿童(A组)和131名成人(B组)接种国产甲肝灭活疫苗，另69名儿童(c组)和75名成人(D组)作为对照接种史克必成公司生产的甲肝灭活疫苗。国产疫苗剂量为儿童640EIU／1．0ml。成人1440EIU／1．0ml，对照疫苗剂量儿童720EIU／1．0ml，成人1440EIU／1．0ml，均采用0、6程序。观察72小时内局部和全身反应及免后1、6、7月的免疫应答水平。结果 所有接种对象均未出现明显局部和全身副反应，亦未发现免后ALT升高。初免后一个月A组和B组抗体阳性率分别为94．8％和96．7％，几何平均滴度为758．6mIU／ml和3630．8mIU／ml。全程免疫后一个月4组抗体阳性率均为100％，A组和B组抗体几何平均滴度上升至10471．2mIU／ml和12302．7mIU／m1，略高于对照的C组和D组(分别为3090．3mIU／d和3388．4mIU／ml)。结论 国产甲肝灭活疫苗具有良好安全性和免疫原性。     

Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a two injection combined high-dose hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine to those of Twinrix

Twinrix (SmithKline Beecham Biologicals) is a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine licensed with a three-dose schedule. A two-dose combined hepatitis A and B vaccine would facilitate immunisation programs. In this prospective study, 100 healthy adults, aged between 18 and 40, were enrolled. A first group of 50 was given a high-dose vaccine at month 0 and 6. A second group of 50 received Twinrix at month 0, 1 and 6.The reactogenicity was assessed after each vaccine dose. There were no severe local adverse events. Seven severe systemic reactions occurred, of which five were fatigue, one was headache and one consist in gastrointestinal symptoms. They all resolved during the 4-day follow-up period. One serious general adverse event was reported, but was clearly unrelated to the vaccine. Thus, both vaccines were well tolerated.The immunogenicity was evaluated by testing for anti-HBs and anti-HAV antibodies. Seroconversion rates and geometric mean titres (GMTs) were compared. At month 7, the anti-HAV GMTs were higher in the high-dose group than in the Twinrix group and, inversely, the anti-HBs GMTs were slightly higher in the Twinrix group than in the high-dose group. At month 7, all subjects in both groups were positive for anti-HAV. All subjects in the high-dose group and 97.6% subjects in the Twinrix group had seroconverted for anti-HBs. Therefore, it can be concluded that with two injections of the high-dose hepatitis A and B vaccine, 6 months apart, a similar immune response can be obtained as induced with three doses of Twinrix at months 0, 1 and 6.     

Immunogenicity and safety of monovalent p1.7(h),4 meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine in toddlers: comparison of two vaccination schedules and two vaccine formulations

The safety and immunogenicity of two PorA-based meningococcal outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines against the P1.4 serosubtype adsorbed with AlPO(4) or Al(OH)(3) were studied in 134 toddlers. Vaccinations were given three times with an interval of 3-6 weeks or twice with an interval of 6-10 weeks. A vaccination was repeated after 20-40 weeks. Pre- and post-immunization sera were tested for bactericidal activity against an isogenic strain expressing P1.7(h), 4 PorA. Both meningococcal OMV vaccines were well tolerated. The percentage of children with a fourfold increase in bactericidal activity was 96% (AlPO(4)-adjuvated vaccine/2+1 schedule), 100% (AlPO(4)-adjuvated vaccine/3+1 schedule), 93% (Al(OH)(3)-adjuvated vaccine/2+1 schedule) and 97% (Al(OH)(3)-adjuvated vaccine/3+1 schedule). Adsorption with AlPO(4) makes the OMV vaccine more immunogenic than adsorption with Al(OH)(3). Bactericidal activity was highest after the 3+1 schedule, although the response shortly after the primary series was higher in the two-dose priming group.     

A tetravalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine is immunogenic and well-tolerated when co-administered with Twinrix(®) in subjects aged 11-17 years: an open, randomised, controlled trial

The co-administration of the tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenACWY-TT, with a licensed hepatitis A and B vaccine, HepA/B (Twinrix^®), was compared to their separate administration in this open, randomised, controlled study. Healthy subjects 11-17 years of age (n = 611) were randomised (3:1:1) to receive both vaccines, MenACWY-TT alone or HepA/B alone. The co-administration of both vaccines was shown to be non-inferior to their individual administration. At seven months after the first vaccination, 99.4-100% of the subjects who received both vaccines co-administered showed seroprotection against all meningococcal serogroups and at least 99.1% of them were seropositive for hepatitis A and seroprotected against hepatitis B. This study suggests that MenACWY-TT vaccine could be co-administered with HepA/B without adversely impacting the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of either of the vaccines.     

Immunogenicity and safety of three consecutive lots of a new preservative-free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive): a double-blind, randomized and controlled trial

Immunization is considered as the most effective way for the prophylaxis of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of three consecutive lots of a new preservative-free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive) in healthy children. A double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted in healthy volunteers aged from 1 to 8 years. Total 400 subjects were enrolled and assigned into four groups, receiving one of the three lots of Healive or an established control vaccine. The vaccination was two-dose regimen with 6 months apart. Anti-HAV titers were determined at the 1st, 6th and 7th month. The results showed that Healive was highly immunogenic in children with 100% seroconversion rate (SR) and 3237-3814 mIU/ml geometry mean titer (GMT) 1 month after the second dose. The immunogenicity of Healive was statistically higher than that of the control vaccine with respect to GMT and SR (P=0.037 to P<0.001). Both Healive and control vaccine were well tolerated with 1-5% incidence of overall adverse reactions (P>0.298). Severe adverse reaction was not reported. Both SRs (1, 6 and 7 months) and GMTs (1 and 7 months) in subjects receiving one of the three consecutive lots of Healive had not statistical difference (P=0.114-0.710), suggesting that Healive was well consistent. The immune responses in younger children (1-3 years) and older children (4-8 years) were similar to each other (P=0.187-0.963). The present study indicated that Healive was greatly consistent between production lots, well tolerated and highly immunogenic in children, which made the preservative-free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine well suitable for inclusion in the routine programme of children vaccination.     

A new accelerated vaccination schedule for rapid protection against hepatitis A and B.

BACKGROUND: Increasing travel stresses the requirement for rapid protection against infections such as hepatitis A and B. METHODS: This randomised, multicentre study investigated an accelerated vaccination schedule using a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix, Smithkline Beecham Biologicals) compared with simultaneous administration of the two corresponding monovalent vaccines. The combined vaccine was administered on days 0, 7 and 21, whereas the comparison group received hepatitis A vaccine on day 0 and hepatitis B vaccine on days 0, 7 and 21. All subjects received booster vaccination at month 12. RESULTS: At month 1, 100% of subjects in the combined group and 99% of the controls were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies. The corresponding seroprotection rates for anti-HBs antibodies were 82.0 and 83.9%, respectively. Examination of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment differences showed the two vaccines to be equivalent in terms of immunogenicity 1 week after the initial vaccination course. Just prior to the booster, the seropositivity rate for anti-HAV was 96.2% in the combined group and 95% in the control group. For anti-HBs, this was 94 and 91.6%, respectively. All subjects were seropositive for anti-HAV and seroprotected against hepatitis B at month 13. The anti-HAV GMCs were 9571mIU/ml with the combined vaccine and 5206mIU/ml in control subjects. The anti-HBs titre was 26002 and 29,196mIU/ml, respectively. Both groups had a similar reactogenicity profile. CONCLUSIONS: The accelerated schedule of the combined vaccine provides a good immune response against hepatitis A and B antigens and is suitable for last minute immunisation.     

Update: Prevention of hepatitis A after exposure to hepatitis A virus and in international travelers. Updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

In 1995, highly effective inactivated hepatitis A vaccines were first licensed in the United States for preexposure prophylaxis against hepatitis A virus (HAV) among persons aged > or =2 years. In 2005, vaccine manufacturers received Food and Drug Administration approval for use of the vaccines in children aged 12-23 months.     

The immunogenicity and reactogenicity profile of a candidate hepatitis B vaccine in an adult vaccine non-responder population

Approximately 5% of vaccinees display an inadequate response after the administration of the standard three dose hepatitis B vaccine. A new hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg/AS04) formulated with the adjuvant AS04 which contains 3'-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (3D-MPL) and alum has been developed. AS04 enhances the immune response which may be beneficial to non-responders. In a single-blind, randomised study, we tested the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the new vaccine with that of commercially established hepatitis B vaccine, both on a 0, 1, 6 months schedule in 20-60 years old non-responders (titre <10 m IU/ml after four doses of hepatitis B vaccine). One month after the first dose the seroprotection rate was 44% for group 1 (58 subjects) receiving the established vaccine versus 66% for group 2 receiving HBsAg/AS04 (57 subjects) (P=0.03). One month after the second dose this was 58 and 81%, respectively (P<0.005) and 1 month after the third dose this was 68 and 98%, respectively (P<0.001). One month after each dose, GMTs were 34, 56 and 111 mIU/ml for group 1 versus 123222 and 1937 mIU/ml for the HBsAg/AS04 group (P<0.05, <0.01 and 0.0001, respectively). Pain at the injection site was the most commonly reported local symptom and very few symptoms were scored as severe. In this group of adult non-responders to previous hepatitis vaccination, the HBsAg/AS04 vaccine was well tolerated and induced, at all time-points, a superior immune response compared to the licensed hepatitis B vaccine.