Portal vein aneurysm as late complication of liver transplantation: a case report

OBJECTIVE: A case of intrahepatic portal vein aneurysm in the late postoperative period after liver transplantation, as well its complications, is reported. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man underwent orthotopic liver transplantation in 1996 for treatment of hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. The patient received a graft from a 10-year-old child. During the follow-up from 1996 to 1998, the patient did not show any alterations. In 1999, during an annual routine exam, a portal vein aneurysm was identified; however, it had no impact on graft function. In November 2002, the patient developed jaundice and serious graft dysfunction requiring hospital admission. Helicoidal CT scan showed an intrahepatic image compatible with a portal vein aneurysm without biliary tract dilatation. During the same hospitalization, he developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to variceal rupture as well as kidney and liver failure, and expired on December 31, 2002. The necropsy demonstrated an intrahepatic portal vein aneurysm with portal vein thrombosis and chronic liver disease. The evolution in this case suggests that if there is an intrahepatic portal vein aneurysm after liver transplantation, the patient is likely to experience an eventual recurrence of portal hypertension; retransplant may be an alternative.     

Arterialization of the portal vein in pediatric liver transplantation

Portal vein arterialization (PVA) is an acquired concept in shunt surgery for portal hypertension. This technique, recently described as both a temporary and permanent procedure in adult liver transplantation, is reported by the authors in two cases of pediatric transplantation. The indication was low portal blood flow after reperfusion with poor graft function due to persistence of spontaneous retroperitoneal venous shunts. In both cases described, PVA allowed for satisfactory macroscopic liver reperfusion. The increase in portal blood flow from 150 to 500 ml/min in the second patient enabled the liver to be reperfused correctly and led to successful transplantation. The graft function in both cases improved in the 1st postoperative week, but thrombosis of the PVA occurred in the 1st patient 2 months after transplantation. Signs of hepatic hyperarterialization occurred in the second patient and this necessitated a dearterialization of the portal vein 2 weeks later. Although the benefit of this procedure appears to be beyond doubt in the immediate postoperative period, we have no data on long-term arterialization. We do think that PVA can be performed in pediatric liver transplantation, but it may need to be done only in special, individual situations when no valid alternative can be proposed, such as in the absence of a mesenteric vein and/or the presence of spontaneous retroperitoneal venous shunts. Received: 24 June 1997 Received after revision: 27 November 1997 Accepted: 28 November 1997     

Right posterior portal vein stenosis developed after living donor liver transplantation using a modified right lobe graft with a type 2 portal vein: a case report

Portal vein complications after liver transplantation (LT) can lead to graft liver failure. In this living donor liver transplantation case a stenosis developed in the right posterior branch of the portal vein of the graft liver from a living donor with type 2 portal vein variation. A 61-year-old woman diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma due to hepatitis B received a liver graft revealing a single lumen divided by a septum. The portal vein was anastomosed to the recipient portal vein without venoplasty. Postoperative Doppler sonogram revealed poor flow in the right posterior portal vein with compensatory arterial hyperperfusion. The postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan revealed narrowing of the proximal part of the right posterior portal vein with periportal tracking. Without intervention, the liver enzyme and bilirubin levels decreased to normal and the follow-up CT scan showed decreased periportal tracking. The patient was discharged without major complications. We believe that the posterior portal vein stenosis resulted from the direct anastomosis of the portal vein without a further venoplasty. Although there was no major complication due to the posterior portal vein stenosis in our patient, we suggest a venoplasty to prevent portal vein stenosis when using right lobe grafts with a type 2 portal vein, even if a single lumen is present and there is a margin for a direct anastomosis.     

Successful minimally invasive management of late portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy due to splenic artery steal syndrome following liver transplantation: a case report

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after liver transplantation (OLT), which occurs in 1% to 2.7% of cases, can compromise patient and graft survival. Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein angioplasty offers an option to treat PVT, diminishing surgically related morbidity and the need for retransplantation. We describe a case of late PVT after OLT, which was successfully treated by a minimally invasive percutaneous transhepatic approach using both mechanical fragmentation and pharmacologic lysis of the thrombus followed by anticoagulation. The patient has had a good clinical course with normal graft function and patent portal blood flow at 6-month follow-up. This case report confirms the possibility of successful recanalization of the portal vein in a patient with late PVT after liver transplantation. Sustained anticoagulation/antiaggregation therapy for at least 6 months after the procedure is advisable.     

Reconstruction of portal vein with an autograft of splenic vein

To re-establish the portal circulation following extensive resection of the portal vein, we interposed an autograft of the splenic vein between the portal and superior mesenteric veins during total pancreatectomy in three patients with cancer of the pancreas. The postoperative course in two patients was uneventful, and patency of the graft was demonstrated angiographically on the 41st and 78th postoperative days, respectively. In the remaining patient an episode of postoperative peritonitis occurred with leakage of the gastrointestinal anastomosis. The patient died on the 78th postoperative day from a massive metastasis to the liver. Autopsy revealed a narrowing of the graft due to technical failure and inflammatory changes, but there was no evidence of cancer invasion. Thus, the autograft of the splenic vein proved useful to bridge the portal vein system.     

Liver transplantation complicated by misplaced TIPS in the portal vein.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and complications related to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stents found in the portal vein at the time of an orthotopic liver transplantation. BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts are frequently used in patients with end-stage liver disease as a bridge to liver transplantation. The incidence of finding the metal stent outside of the liver parenchyma at the time of transplantation is reported as high as 30%. Most cases that have been detailed involve stents misplaced in the vena cava with various outcomes. Almost no data are available regarding stents misplaced into the portal vein. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report our experience with four patients with whom a TIPS stent was found misplaced in the portal vein at the time of liver transplantation, including one patient with a stent extending into the superior mesenteric vein. This patient required extensive venous reconstruction using a retropancreatic "pant" donor-iliac vein graft. The three other patients were transplanted without the need for extensive venous reconstruction. There was no significant difference in operative times for this group of patients, but there was a significant increase in the requirement for blood transfusion. In a follow-up period ranging from 6 months to 2 years, all patients remained alive and had normal portal venous flow and functioning allografts. Most misplaced stents were placed in patients with small cirrhotic livers and by radiologists with minimal experience with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Misplaced TIPS in the portal vein before liver transplantation is a more frequent complication than previously reported; however, it does not represent major technical difficulty if a clamp can be placed proximally on the portal vein. In the case of a stent extending below the spleno-mesenteric confluence, interposition grafts such as a donor-iliac vein graft are necessary for venous reconstruction. The experience of the radiologist is critical to prevent this complication.     

Safety and necessity of including the middle hepatic vein in the right lobe graft in adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of donors who have donated the middle hepatic vein in right lobe live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to determine whether such inclusion is necessary for optimum graft function. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The necessity to include the middle hepatic vein in a right lobe graft in adult-to-adult LDLT is controversial. Inclusion of the middle hepatic vein in the graft provides uniform hepatic venous drainage but may lead to congestion of segment IV in the donor. METHODS: From 1996 to 2002, 93 right-lobe LDLTs were performed. All right-lobe grafts except 1 contained the middle hepatic vein. In the donor operation, attention was paid to preserve the segment IV hepatic artery and to avoid prolonged rotation of the right lobe. The middle hepatic vein was transected proximal to a major segment IVb hepatic vein whereas possible to preserve the venous drainage in the liver remnant. RESULTS: There was no donor death. Two donors had intraoperative complications (accidental left hepatic vein occlusion and portal vein thrombosis) and were well after immediate rectification. Twenty-four donors (26%) had postoperative complications, mostly minor wound infection. The postoperative international normalized ratio on day 1 was better in the donors with preservation of segment IVb hepatic vein than those without the preservation, but, in all donors, the liver function was largely normal by postoperative day 7. The first recipient had severe graft congestion as the middle hepatic vein was not reconstructed before reperfusion. In 7 other recipients, the middle hepatic vein was found occluded intraoperatively owing to technical errors. The postoperative hepatic and renal function of the recipients with an occluded or absent middle hepatic vein was worse than those with a patent middle hepatic vein. The hospital mortality rate was also higher in those with an occluded middle hepatic vein (3/9 vs. 5/84, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of the middle hepatic vein in right-lobe LDLT is safe and is essential for optimum graft function and patient survival.     

Improved technique of portal vein reconstruction in pediatric liver transplant recipients with portal vein hypoplasia

BACKGROUND: Children with small or hypoplastic portal veins represent a challenge for liver transplantation. Graft loss of up to 70% has been reported in these patients in the past. A variety of techniques has been used in both cadaveric and living related transplants in an effort to overcome this problem. Variability arises as to whether to use a vascular graft and where on the portal system to attach the graft. METHOD: We present our usage of a simple and straightforward interposition iliac vein allograft fashioned in a manner to achieve large anastomotic cross-sectional area on the confluence of the superior mesenteric/splenic veins. The procedure also overcomes problems of graft vein/portal vein size mismatch in the cases where liver and vein grafts are procured from much larger donors. RESULTS: A total of 14 children presented with hypoplastic portal vein (diameter<5 mm), of a total of 30 consecutive patients requiring cadaveric liver transplants, and benefited from this technique. Median recipient age was 10.5 months. Revascularization times ranged from 22 to 43 min with a mean of 33 min. All patients are alive and well at a mean follow-up of 329 days (10 months). All liver grafts are well and functioning. No portal vein problem was detected. CONCLUSION: Results from this technique are clearly encouraging. Because portal vein hypoplasia is a common problem in pediatric transplant candidates, we believe this alternative technique is of interest and should be added to the transplant surgeon's armamentarium.     

Liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis and central portacaval shunts.

The authors have analyzed the impact of pre-existing portal vein pathology on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation. The incidence was high in patients suffering from chronic active hepatitis, hypercoagulable states, trauma or previous dissection of the porta hepatis, and splenectomy. The existence of portal vein thrombosis (23 patients) or surgical central portosystemic shunt (10 patients) was documented by preoperative Doppler sonogram or angiography (26/33), or operative findings of occluded vein (7/33). Successful thrombectomy and dismantling of portacaval shunts were achieved in most cases (24/33). Only nine patients required the placement of an interposition vein graft to the superior mesenteric vein. The intraoperative course was characterized by increased blood loss and coagulopathy, significantly higher than in patients with a patent portal vein. When compared with all liver transplants, the immediate postoperative complication rate was higher for primary nonfunction (33% versus 8%), re-exploration for intraperitoneal bleeding and hematomas, and morbid infections. Rethrombosis rate of thrombectomized veins or vein graft was low (2/33). The mortality rate was 35% in the presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and 30% for portacaval shuct (PCS), both significantly higher than the 12% for other orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) patients. These results are expected to improve with better patient selection, surgical experience, and anticipation of the complex postoperative course. The authors conclude that PVT or the presence of PCS are not contraindications to orthotopic liver transplantation.     

Explanted portal vein grafts for middle hepatic vein tributaries in living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The availability of a venous graft is limited in the setting of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the management of the middle hepatic vein middle hepatic vein tributaries in right lobe LDLT still remains controversial. METHODS: Twenty-three right lobe LDLT grafts, with the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries using the explanted portal veins from the explanted livers, were evaluated for the patency, postLDLT liver function tests, and graft survival. RESULTS: The methods of outflow reconstruction were classified into three types: the interposition of the graft to the middle/left hepatic vein (n=12), to the vena cava (n=9), and to the vena cava as a co-orifice with the graft right hepatic vein (n=2). The 1- and 3-year patency rates were 76.7% and 76.7% respectively, with the graft occlusion in five cases. The occluded cases (n=5) had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase levels as compared with those of patent cases (n=18) at 4 weeks after transplantation (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the total bilirubin and prothrombin time in either group during the observation periods. The 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.1% and 91.1%, respectively. In addition, there was no graft loss due to occlusion. CONCLUSION: The use of the recipient's explanted full-length hilar portal vein for the reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein tributaries is thus considered to be a feasible and valuable strategy in the setting of a right lobe LDLT, where appropriate vascular grafts are not always available.     

Portal vein thrombosis after intraportal hepatocytes transplantation in a liver transplant recipient

Hepatocytes transplantation is viewed as a possible alternative or as a bridge therapy to liver transplantation for patients affected by acute or chronic liver disorders. Very few data regarding complications of hepatocytes transplantation is available from the literature. Herein we report for the first time a case of portal vein thrombosis after intraportal hepatocytes transplantation in a liver transplant recipient. A patient affected by acute graft dysfunction, not eligible for retransplantation, underwent intraportal infusion of 2 billion viable cryopreserved ABO identical human allogenic hepatocytes over a period of 5 h. Hepatocytes were transplanted at a concentration of 14 million/ml for a total infused volume of 280 ml. Doppler portal vein ultrasound and intraportal pressure were monitored during cell infusion. The procedure was complicated, 8 h after termination, by the development of portal vein thrombosis with liver failure and death of the patient. Autopsy showed occlusive thrombosis of the intrahepatic portal vein branches; cells or large aggregates of epithelial elements (polyclonal CEA positive), suggestive for transplanted hepatocytes, were co-localized inside the thrombus.     

Innovative techniques for and results of portal vein reconstruction in living-related liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Portal vein reconstruction is a crucial factor affecting the outcome of a successful living-related liver transplantation. We describe here our experience with portal vein reconstruction in 314 cases of living-related liver transplantation with use of novel surgical modalities to enable the transplant surgeons to deal with any size mismatch between the donor's and recipient's portal veins. METHODS: Portal vein reconstruction was classified into 2 major groups, anastomosis without and with a vein graft. When there was no stenosis of the recipient portal vein and the diameter was the same, the portal trunk was used for anastomosis. When the diameter mismatch was minimal, branch patch anastomosis was feasible. When the recipient portal vein was significantly stenotic and the portal vein of the graft was long enough, we removed the stenotic trunk and constructed an anastomosis between the graft portal vein and the confluence of the recipient portal vein. When the graft portal vein was short, a vein graft was interposed. The vein patch technique was preferable when the diameter of the graft vein was not large enough for the interposition technique. RESULTS: Anastomosis without vein graft included trunk anastomosis (n = 156), branch patch anastomosis (n = 39), and confluence anastomosis (n = 22). Anastomosis with vein graft used the interposition technique (n = 77) and vein patch technique (n = 27). The origin of the grafts was mostly from the maternal left ovarian vein (70%) or the paternal inferior mesenteric vein (27%). Complications related to portal vein reconstruction occurred in 16 (5%) patients: portal vein thrombosis in 8, stenosis in 7, and fatal rupture in 1 patient. The incidence of complications was similar for all techniques except for confluence anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Our innovative techniques should be helpful for overcoming diameter or length mismatches in portal vein reconstruction in pediatric liver transplantation.     

Primary permanent arterialization of the portal vein in liver transplantation

Permanent total arterialization of the portal vein in liver transplantation has been described as a method of providing portal inflow after insufficient thrombectomy due to chronic occlusion of the portal-vein system. A specific problem is the restriction of the arterial inflow and its long-term adaptation after transplantation. We describe here the surgical techniques and clinical course of three patients who underwent portal-vein arterialization for liver transplantation. Two patients had an uneventful course. In one patient, a flow reduction by means of coil embolization of one arterial inflow branch was performed; thereafter, the patient recuperated well. Analysing the microcirculation of an arterialized graft in comparison with liver grafts with normal non-arterialized portal-vein inflow, we observed an increase in inter-sinusoidal distance and a decrease in sinusoidal red blood cell velocity. From a technical point of view, we recommend permanent portal-vein arterialization by an iliac artery graft interposition from the subdiaphragmatic aorta. The inflow to the portal vein can easily be reduced by the banding of the arterial graft interposition.     

Outcome of patients with pre-existing portal vein thrombosis undergoing arterialization of the portal vein during liver transplantation

Arterialization of the portal vein is being propagated as a technical possibility in liver transplant recipients with pre-existing portal vein thrombosis. In our own small series, portal vein arterialization (PVA) was carried out in four patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. In three of these cases, the portal vein was anastomosed to the aorta via an interposed iliac artery, and in one case, directly to the hepatic artery. After PVA, all transplants showed regular initial function. Two patients died postoperatively after 19 and 50 days, of intra-abdominal haemorrhage and liver necrosis with thrombosis of the portal vein, respectively. A further patient had previously developed fibrosis of the liver, which led to the death of the patient 11 months after PVA. In the remaining patient, chronic rejection requiring re-transplantation developed 24 months after PVA had been performed. These unfavourable results prompt the conclusion that PVA cannot be recommended as a standard clinical procedure.     

Mesorenal shunt using inferior mesenteric vein and left renal vein in a case of LDLT

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an established treatment option around the world. However, small-for-size graft syndrome remains one of the most serious complications affecting transplant outcomes. Excessive portal hypertension and overperfusion have been shown to play a causative role in this graft injury. Recently, portal hypertension per se has been considered detrimental to graft function, and thus to be avoided for successful outcomes after LDLT. We constructed a mesorenal shunt with anastomosis of the inferior mesenteric vein and left renal vein in the case of an LDLT recipient who showed high portal vein pressure after graft reperfusion. The inferior mesenteric vein is close to the left renal vein, and the anastomosis was obtained with relative ease. The shunt was effective in decreasing portal vein pressure, and postoperative graft function was satisfactory. This new method represents an option for attenuating portal hypertension when elevated portal vein pressure is observed in adult LDLT after graft reperfusion.     

Posttransplant bilioportal fistula with portal vein thrombosis: a case report

An 8-year-old female patient, known to have post-Kasai biliary atresia with mild intrapulmonary shunting, underwent living donor liver transplantation because of recurrent cholangitis. After the treatment of postoperative biliary stricture with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, the patient subsequently developed hematochezia with portal vein thrombosis. The intraoperative findings showed portal vein thrombosis with a bilioportal fistula. We performed closure of the bilioportal fistula and reconstruction of the portal vein with a native internal jugular vein interposition graft. A bilioportal fistula due to percutaneous hepatobiliary procedures is a reportedly a rare complication following liver transplantation. The patient is currently doing well after a successful surgical intervention.     

Long‐term outcomes of transmesenteric portal vein recanalization for the treatment of chronic portal vein thrombosis after pediatric liver transplantation

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) may occur at any time following liver transplantation. We describe our experience with portal vein recanalization in cases of thrombosis after liver transplantation. Twenty‐eight children (5%) out of 566 liver transplant recipients underwent portal vein recanalization using a transmesenteric approach. All children received left hepatic segments, developed PVT, and had symptoms or signs of portal hypertension. Portal vein recanalization was performed via the transmesenteric route in all cases. Twenty‐two (78.6%) patients underwent successful recanalization and stent placement. They received oral anticoagulants after the procedure, and clinical symptoms subsided. Symptoms recurred due to portal vein restenosis/thrombosis in seven patients. On an intention‐to‐treat basis, the success rate of the proposed treatment was 60.7%. Only 17 out of 28 children with posttransplant chronic PVT retained stent patency (primary + assisted) at the end of the study period. In cases of portal vein obstruction, the transmesenteric approach via minilaparotomy is technically feasible with good clinical and hemodynamic results. It is an alternative procedure to reestablish the portal flow to the liver graft that can be performed in selected cases and a therapeutic addition to other treatment strategies currently used to treat chronic PVT.     

Preoperative imaging of left portal vein at the Rex recess for Rex shunt formation using wedged hepatic vein carbon dioxide portography

Background

In children with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO), formation of a mesentericoportal bypass (Rex shunt) restores hepatopetal flow, relieves portal hypertension, and reduces variceal bleeding and hypersplenism. The Rex shunt is created by inserting a vein graft between the superior mesenteric vein and the umbilical segment (Rex) of the left portal vein within the Rex recess of the liver. The preoperative evaluation of a patient with EHPVO includes an accurate assessment of the venous inflow and outflow. The inflow portal vein is readily assessed by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. The outflow intrahepatic portal vein is harder to assess. We report our experience of patients evaluated with wedged hepatic vein carbon dioxide portography (WHVCP).

Method

All children referred for venography from October 2001 to October 2007 were prospectively identified, and clinical and radiologic data were reviewed retrospectively. The imaging findings were correlated to findings at surgery.

Results

Eleven children (range, 3-14 years, median, 6 years) were referred for preoperative wedged hepatic venography. The left portal vein at the Rex recess was clearly identified in 9 patients (82%). In the other 2 patients (18%), the Rex segment was not identified despite opacification of left and right intrahepatic portal veins; this was taken to indicate an occluded segment. Wedged venography was performed with carbon dioxide in 10 patients (91%). Carbon dioxide was contraindicated in the final patient because of the presence of a ventricular septal defect.

Conclusion

Our series demonstrates the use of WHVCP as a diagnostic tool in preoperative assessment of the Rex segment of left portal vein in children with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction.     

Duodeno-jejunal varicosities following extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis.

A 31 year old man, under investigation for melena, was found at endoscopy to have varicosities at the site of a duodeno-jejunostomy which had been performed for duodenal atresia when he was three days old. Angiography revealed an occluded portal vein with an extensive collateral circulation. At laparotomy some of the collateral vessels were found to pass through the anastomotic site and directly into the left lobe of the liver. The portal pressure was found to be minimally elevated. Resection of the anastomotic segment was performed with reconstruction using a Roux en Y jejunal loop. Bleeding from collateral vessels passing through an anastomosis site in a patient with extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis has not previously been reported.     

Application of cryopreserved vein grafts as a conduit between the coronary vein and liver graft to reconstruct portal flow in adult living liver transplantation

Abstract:  Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation is an alternative to donation from a deceased individual, and can help relieve the shortage of liver donations available for adult patients in Asian countries. When transplant candidates have thrombosis and deterioration of the portal vein, living donor liver transplantation is relatively contraindicated because portal veins in the grafts are short and vein grafts may not be available to reconstruct the portal vein. From June 2003 to May 2007, 82 adult living donor liver transplantations were performed at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital. Three patients had portal vein thrombosis and marked fibrosis of the portal vein and cryopreserved vein grafts were used to reconstruct portal flow from the engorged coronary vein to the graft portal vein. All vein grafts are patent and all patients have normal liver function at 21–36 months after transplantation. When cryopreserved vein grafts are available, adult living donor liver transplantation can be successfully performed in patients with marked deterioration of the portal vein. The short distance from the engorged coronary vein to the graft portal vein may decrease the incidence of re-thrombosis of the venous conduit.