Phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine (NSC#366140) in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: Pyrazoloacridine (PZA) is an investigational nucleic acid binding agent that inhibits the activity of topoisomerases 1 and 2. We conducted a phase II clinical study to determine the efficacy and toxicities of PZA in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Experimental Design: In this phase II multicenter study, patients who were treated with no more than one prior chemotherapy for MBC were treated with 750 mg/m2 of PZA given as a 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Treatment cycles were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The study was designed to distinguish between a response rate of <15% vs >30% (alpha = 0.10, beta = 0.10) using Simons optimal 2-stage design. At least 2 responses were required in the first 12 patients in the 1st stage and 6 of 35 in the 2nd stage to recommend the agent for further study. Results: Two patients in the first stage had a response allowing accrual to second stage. A total of 15 patients (out of 35 planned) were treated on the study prior to premature closure. Three patients had a partial response (20%) lasting 4.5–6 months. Two patients had stable disease for 3 and 5 months. The dose limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia with ten patients requiring dose reduction or dose delay for grade 4 neutropenia. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities include vomiting (n = 2), nausea (n = 2), neurotoxicity (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), anemia (n = 1), dyspnea 9n = 1) and renal (n = 1). Conclusions: Pyrazoloacridine demonstrated modest activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

A phase II study of cell cycle inhibitor UCN-01 in patients with metastatic melanoma: a California Cancer Consortium trial

Background Genetic abnormalities in cell cycle control are common in malignant melanoma. UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine) is an investigational agent that exhibits antitumor activity by perturbing the cancer cell cycle. A patient with advanced melanoma experienced a partial response in a phase I trial of single agent UCN-01. We sought to determine the activity of UCN-01 against refractory metastatic melanoma in a phase II study. Patients and methods Patients with advanced melanoma received UCN-01 at 90 mg/m² over 3 h on cycle 1, reduced to 45 mg/m² over 3 h for subsequent cycles, every 21 days. Primary endpoint was tumor response. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A two-stage (17 + 16), single arm phase II design was employed. A true response rate of ≥20% (i.e., at least one responder in the first stage, or at least four responders overall) was to be considered promising for further development of UCN-01 in this setting. Results Seventeen patients were accrued in the first stage. One patient was inevaluable for response. Four (24%) patients had stable disease, and 12 (71%) had disease progression. As there were no responders in the first stage, the study was closed to further accrual. Median PFS was 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.2–3.0) while median OS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.4–18.4). One-year and two year OS rates were 41% and 12%, respectively. A median of two cycles were delivered (range, 1–18). Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities include hyperglycemia (N = 2), fatigue (N = 1), and diarrhea (N = 1). One patient experienced grade 4 creatinine elevation and grade 4 anemia possibly due to UCN-01. No dose modification was required as these patients had disease progression. Conclusion Although well tolerated, UCN-01 as a single agent did not have sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in refractory melanoma.     

A pilot phase II trial of all-<Emphasis Type="Italic">trans</Emphasis> retinoic acid (Vesanoid) and paclitaxel (Taxol) in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: We investigated a combination therapy with weekly paclitaxel and all trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) for tolerability, response to treatment, time to progression and survival in previously treated patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. Our rationale was based on preclinical studies demonstrating potentiation of the cytotoxic effects of taxanes and induction of differentiation by ATRA. Patients and methods: Seventeen patients with previously treated metastatic or recurrent breast cancer were enrolled to a regimen of all-trans retinoic acid (Vesanoid, tretinoin, Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.) 45 mg/m² PO daily for 4 days starting 2 days before a 1 h treatment with paclitaxel (Taxol, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ) 80 mg/m² IV administered weekly for 3 weeks, repeated in 28 day cycles until disease progression or until no longer tolerated. Patients were evaluated for toxicity, response, time to progression and survival. Patients were primarily African American and Latino, representative of the population served by our Cancer Center. Results: The regimen was relatively well tolerated. There were nine grade 3 and one grade 4 toxic events. We administered 162 treatment cycles with a mean of 7.5 per patient (range 1–22, median 5). Three patients had a partial response (17.6%) and ten patients had stable disease (58.8%), with an overall clinical benefit of 76.4%. Median time to progression was 6.0 months (range 1–21, mean 7.7 months). Fourteen evaluable patients had a median survival of 16 months (range 1–68 months, mean 25.2 months). Conclusions: The data suggest this is a well tolerated regimen with modest response rates but with time to progression and survival rates similar to those reported for paclitaxel alone and relatively high rates of stable disease in this sample of patients.     

Results of a phase II trial of S-1 as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (CESAR-study group)

Purpose S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, has previously demonstrated anticancer efficacy in pancreatic cancer (PC), predominantly in Asian populations. This study evaluated the antitumor effect and safety of S-1 in Caucasian patients with metastatic PC. Methods Chemotherapy-na?ve patients received S-1 orally at 30 mg/m² twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks, repeated every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS and safety assessment. The trial had a Simon’s two-stage design with 22 patients evaluable for efficacy in stage 1 and an additional 18 patients in stage 2, if ≥3/22 patients had a confirmed response at the first stage. Results Three out of 27 patients showed PR, however, detection of asymptomatic brain metastases in one of them prevented this study from proceeding to stage 2. The median PFS and OS for all patients was 3.5 and 9.1 months, respectively. The median duration of disease control for patients with SD or PR (n = 17) was 4.3 months. S-1 was well tolerated; fatigue was the most frequent grade 3/4 adverse event. Conclusions Efficacy data of PFS and OS are at least comparable to gemcitabine, the current standard of care. S-1 is active in Caucasian patients with metastatic PC.     

Phase II trial of fenretinide (NSC 374551) in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer

Background Alterations in retinoid signaling appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Fenretinide [N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide], a synthetic retinoid, inhibits the growth of SCLC cells in vitro via the induction of apoptosis. Since these data suggested that SCLC is the adult solid tumor that is most susceptible to fenretinide, a trial to evaluate the clinical activity of fenretinide in patients with SCLC was considered the definitive test of its clinical potential in adult oncology. Methods Patients with progressive SCLC after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens and a performance status of 0–2 were eligible for the study. Patients with stable, treated brain metastases were eligible. Fenretinide 900 mg/m² twice daily was administered orally on days 1–7 of each 21-day cycle. Blood and saliva were collected pre-treatment and on day 7 of cycle 1 to measure fenretinide and retinol levels by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. Fifteen patients had one prior chemotherapy regimen and four patients had two prior regimens. The median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 10 months. A median of two cycles of fenretinide was administered. There were no objective responses, but four of 17 evaluable patients (24%) had stable disease after 2–17 cycles. The median time to treatment failure was 5.7 weeks overall, while the four patients with stable disease demonstrated treatment failure at 11, 13, 19, and 52 weeks. Median survival was 25 weeks, with one patient alive 22 months after the start of treatment. The 1-year survival rate was 29%. Toxicity included mild, reversible visual changes (haziness, altered night vision), grade 1–3 nausea/vomiting, and grade 1–2 diarrhea. The mean day 7 plasma fenretinide level was 2.90 ± 1.66 μg/ml (7.40 ± 4.25 μM; n = 14). The mean pre-treatment and day 7 plasma retinol levels were 0.47 ± 0.16 μg/ml and 0.05 ± 0.07 μg/ml (n = 8), respectively. The mean day 7 salivary fenretinide level was 0.08 ± 0.18 μg/ml, with no correlation between salivary and plasma drug levels. Conclusions Fenretinide is well tolerated in patients with SCLC and stabilization of disease was noted in 24% of patients with this aggressive disease. However, after the first stage of enrollment, the response rate did not meet criteria to proceed with full trial accrual. Plasma concentrations of fenretinide that induce cytotoxicity in vitro in SCLC cell lines are clinically achievable, but there were no objective responses. Non-invasive drug monitoring using saliva underestimates systemic exposure.     

Arsenic trioxide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II trial

Summary Background: Arsenic trioxide induces growth inhibition and apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines. A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent arsenic trioxide in patients with HCC. Methods: Inclusion criteria included advanced HCC patients to whom no standard palliative treatment can be offered, good organ function and liver function reserve. Patients received arsenic trioxide 0.16–0.24 mg/kg per day for 5–6 days per week for 3–4 weeks, followed by one-week rest. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with 6-month disease stabilization. Results: Twenty-nine patients (median age, 59) with locally advanced or metastatic HCC received a total of 61 cycles (median, 2; range, 1–6). One patient had partial response. Three patients had disease stabilization for at least six months. The 6-month tumor stabilization rate was 14% (95% CI, 1–27). The median overall survival was 4.8 months (95% CI, 1.4–8.2) and one-year survival was 30%. Conclusion: Single-agent arsenic trioxide using this dose schedule is not active against advanced HCC.     

A phase II open-label trial of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma who have undergone an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant and failed to achieve a complete response

Background A majority of multiple myeloma (MM) patients fail to achieve complete response (CR) to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT); effective options following autologous transplantation are needed. Bortezomib (B) is active against MM. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of B following high-dose melphalan therapy and PBSCT. Methods Fifty patients enrolled (48 evaluable) and 49 were treated (safety population). Treatment: 4 cycles B 1.3 mg/m² Days 1, 4, 8, and 11/21-days; 4 additional cycles were permitted for stable or responding patients. Results Median age was 55 years (range, 38–73), 68% male, 64% ECOG PS = 0, 44% Durie-Salmon Stage IIIA prior to induction, 42% had symptomatic IgG MM; 74% had prior single transplant (26% tandem). Responses post-transplant: 70% PRs, 18% MRs. A median of 4 cycles (range, 2–8) of B were administered. Responses: CR 8%, uCR 2%, PR 23%, uPR 19%, MR 10%, and no change 35%; median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 6.2 months (range, 1.0–19.4). Three deaths occurred (n = 1 sepsis, n = 2 disease progression). Grade 3–4 treatment-related toxicities included: thrombocytopenia, neuropathy (14%, each); asthenia, neutropenia (10%, each); and nausea (4%). Twelve patients (24%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity and 30 patients (60%) completed the study; 20 patients started new treatment (median 5.8 months [range, 1.5–20.3]). Conclusions The study closed early due to widespread availability of B, and the lack of B-na?ve patients. Bortezomib monotherapy after melphalan and autologous PBSCT was feasible, safe and well-tolerated (toxicities were manageable), but failed to produce the hypothesized response rates.     

A multi-center phase II study of BMS-247550 (Ixabepilone) by two schedules in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma previously treated with a taxane

Summary Purpose: Ixabepilone is one of the epothilones, a new class of cytotoxics, that function as microtubule-stabilizing agents. With the primary endpoint of assessing ixabepilone’s response rate against metastatic gastric cancer previously treated with a taxane, we performed a multi-center phase II trial.Patients and methods: Patients with histologically documented metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, who had previously received a taxane, were eligible. Patients were required to have near normal organ function, ≥18 years of age, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. A written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Ixabepilone was administered over one hour intravenously at a dose of 50 mg/m² every 21 days (23 patients; cohort A) and 24 subsequent patients were treated with an amended protocol schedule to receive 6 mg/m² intravenously on days 1–5 every 21 days (cohort B).Results: A total of 47 patients were treated. Most patients were men with a median performance status of 1. Two of 23 patients in cohort A achieved a confirmed partial response (9%, 95% CI 1.1–28%) but none of the 24 patients in cohort B achieved a response. A higher proportion of patients in cohort A experienced Grade 3/4 toxicities compared with those in cohort B.Conclusions: Ixabepilone, on a once every 21-day schedule, is modestly active against metastatic gastric cancer previously treated with a taxane. The days 1–5 every 21 days schedule had a more favorable safety profile but no activity. The results of this study suggest that once every 21-day ixabepilone schedule should be pursued further in untreated gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients. This research was supported in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, New Jersey. Patients were accrued in Tubingen, Germany     

Phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with vinorelbine versus gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer

Background No clear data are available concerning the superiority of combination chemotherapy to sequential therapy using agents beyond 1st or 2nd line chemotherapy for treating patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods Patients were randomized to receive a combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine or gemcitabine until disease progression followed by vinorelbine monotherapy. Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Results Forty-two patients were randomized to the combination arm and 40 were randomized to the sequential arm. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the arms. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range, 1–23) for the combination arm and 6 (range, 1–25) for the sequential arm. Patients receiving combination therapy had a higher composite response rate (26.8% vs. 12.5%; P = 0.106) but a shorter median time to treatment failure (3.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.252) as compared to patients receiving sequential monotherapy. Median overall survival for the combination and sequential arms was 10.6 months and 8.9 months, respectively (P = 0.436). Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms. Quality of life measurements in global health, role, and social function were superior in the combination arm (P < 0.05). Conclusions Combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine therapy appears comparable to sequential monotherapy for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer as demonstrated by improved quality of life outcomes with similar therapeutic efficacies and incidences of adverse events.     

A phase II trial of pemetrexed in patients with metastatic renal cancer

Background. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rising in incidence but remains difficult to treat. This clinical trial evaluated the effects of pemetrexed (multitargeted antifolate, ALIMTA®) for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Patients and methods. Patients were required to have histological diagnosis of metastatic RCC with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy. In addition, patients were required to have a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0–2 and adequate bone marrow reserve. Patients received pemetrexed at a dose of 600mg/m² as a 10min infusion every 3 weeks. Patients did not receive folic acid or vitamin B₁₂ supplementation. Results. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and thirty two were evaluable for response. Three patients had a partial response for a response rate of 9% (95% CI 2–25%). The median time to progressive disease was 10.5 months. Of the nonresponders, twenty two had stable disease (median duration was 5.8 months; range 1.5–27.7) and seven had progressive disease (median time to progression was 5.4 months). Median time to progression for all qualified patients was 5.7 months. Common toxicities experienced were diarrhea and infection. Fatigue, stomatitis, and rash were also reported. The most common hematologic toxicity was grade 3/4 lymphopenia in 76% of patients. Leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia were also frequently reported. Conclusion. Single-agent pemetrexed has moderate activity in the treatment of metastatic RCC and should be investigated in combination with other potential active agents, as first-line treatment.     

A phase 2 study of SP1049C,doxorubicin in P-glycoprotein-targeting pluronics,in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Purpose To evaluate the antitumor activity of SP1049C, a novel P-glycoprotein targeting micellar formulation of doxorubicin, consisting of doxorubicin and two non-ionic block copolymers (pluronics), in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Patients and Methods Patients with metastatic or locally advanced unresectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or GEJ who had not previously received systemic chemotherapy and had measurable disease were treated with SP1049C 75 mg/m² (doxorubicin equivalents) as a brief intravenous infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate in patients who had received a least one course of SP1049C and had undergone tumor assessment, whereas, secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. A review of scans was also conducted post-hoc by a blinded panel of radiologists. Results Twenty-one patients, of which 19 were evaluable for response, were treated with at least one dose of SP1049C. Nine patients had a partial response (PR) and eight patients had either a minor response or stable disease as their best response. The objective response rate was 47% (95% CI: 24.4–71) in the evaluable patient population, whereas the objective response rate was 43% (95% CI: 21.8–65.9) in the ITT population. The post-hoc radiological review confirmed that all nine responders had a PR; seven of the nine had a PR that was confirmed by a subsequent scan, whilst two patients had unconfirmed PRs. The median overall survival and PFS were 10.0 months (95%CI: 4.8–11.2) and 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.5–7.6), respectively. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of SP1049C. Four patients developed an absolute percentage decrement of at least 15% in their left ventricular ejection fraction, none of which decreased to below 45% nor were symptomatic. Conclusion SP1049C has a notable single-agent activity in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ, as well as an acceptable safety profile. These results, in addition to the results of preclinical studies demonstrating superior antitumor activity of SP1049C compared with doxorubicin in a standard formulation, indicate that further evaluations of SP1049C alone or combined with other relevant therapeutics in this disease setting are warranted.     

Cilengitide (EMD 121974, NSC 707544) in asymptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients: a randomized phase II trial by the prostate cancer clinical trials consortium

Background Integrins are involved in prostate cancer metastasis by regulating cell adhesion, migration, invasion, motility, angiogenesis and bone metabolism. We evaluated the efficacy of two dose levels of cilengitide in patients (pts) with castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods Chemotherapy-na?ve, asymptomatic metastatic CRPC pts were randomized to cilengitide 500 mg or 2,000 mg IV twice weekly using parallel 2-stage design. The primary endpoint was rate of objective clinical progression at 6-months. Secondary endpoints included clinical and PSA response rates, safety and effects of cilengitide treatment on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and bone remodeling markers. Results Forty-four pts were accrued to first stage (22/arm). Median number of cycles was three in both arms (500 mg arm: 1–8; 2,000 mg arm: 1–15). At 6 months, two pts (9%) on the 500 mg arm and five pts (23%) on the 2,000 mg arm had not progressed. Best objective response was stable disease (SD) in seven pts for 9.9[8.1,20.9] months. There were three grade 3 and no grade 4 toxicities. At 12 weeks, analysis of bone markers did not reveal significant trends. At progression, bone specific alkaline phosphatase and N-telopeptide increased in all pts, less so in pts on the 2,000 mg arm and in pts on both arms who obtained SD at 6 months. CTCs increased over time in both arms. Conclusion Cilengitide was well tolerated with modest clinical effect in favor of the higher dose. The unique trial design including a shift from response rate to objective progression as the endpoint, and not acting on PSA increases was feasible.     

Open-label phase I trial of vandetanib in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Summary   Background: Vandetanib (ZACTIMA™) is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor and RET receptor tyrosine kinases. The safety and tolerability of vandetanib plus mFOLFOX6 was investigated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Patients eligible for first- or second-line chemotherapy received once-daily oral doses of vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) plus 14-day treatment cycles of mFOLFOX6. Results: Seventeen patients received vandetanib 100 mg (n = 9) or 300 mg (n = 8) plus mFOLFOX6. The protocol definition of a tolerable dose (vandetanib-related dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] in less than two patients) was met in both dose cohorts, with one DLT of diarrhoea reported in each. Overall, the most common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea and lethargy (all n = 11). There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between vandetanib and mFOLFOX6. Preliminary efficacy results included one complete response and three confirmed partial responses. Conclusions: In patients with advanced CRC, once-daily vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) with mFOLFOX6 was generally well tolerated.     

Phase I study of pemetrexed and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with refractory breast,ovarian, primary peritoneal,or fallopian tube cancer

Purpose: Pemetrexed and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) are clinically active as single agents and preclinically synergistic. This phase I, open-label trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of pemetrexed followed by PLD in patients with breast or gynecologic cancers. Patients: Using 3 + 3 dose escalation, cohorts of 3–9 patients received escalating doses of pemetrexed 400–500 mg/m² on days 1 and 15 and PLD 30–45 mg/m² on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. All patients received folic acid and vitamin B₁₂ until 21 days after last pemetrexed dose. Patients continued until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or progression (PD). Results: From 11/05 to 2/08, 29 patients entered treatment; median age: 60.6 years (range, 47.5–80.1); ECOG PS 0/1: 27.6%/72.4%; primary disease site: ovarian (55.2%), breast (34.5%), peritoneum (10.3%); prior therapies: chemotherapy (100.0%), surgery (72.4%), hormones/biologics (35%), and radiation (20.7%). Pemetrexed/PLD dose levels: L1 = 400/30 (n = 4), L2 = 400/35 (n = 6), L3 = 500/35 (n = 9), L4 = 500/40 (n = 7), and L5 = 500/45 (n = 3). Treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicities: hematologic—neutropenia (86.2%), leukopenia (58.6%), thrombocytopenia (48.3%), anemia (41.4%); nonhematologic—mucosal inflammation (24.1%), febrile neutropenia (24.1%), hand-foot syndrome (13.8%), hypokalaemia (10.3%). Reasons for discontinuation: PD (48.3%), toxicity (27.6%), patient request (13.8%), and investigator request (10.3%). Efficacy: 5 ovarian patients (20.8%) achieved partial response; median time to progression (TTP) was 6.1 months (range, 1.2–12.5). Conclusion: Pemetrexed plus PLD was reasonably tolerated in this heavily–pretreated population. MTD: pemetrexed 500 mg/m² and PLD 40 mg/m² may be carried forward to phase II studies in specific patient populations. TTP in platinum-refractory ovarian patients was greater than expected.     

A phase II study of the halichondrin B analog eribulin mesylate in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic cancer

Background Eribulin mesylate is a halichondrin B analog that inhibits microtubule dynamics. Pre-clinical studies have suggested anti-tumor activity in pancreatic cancer. This phase II study of eribulin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine was conducted by the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II consortium. Patients and Methods Eligibility criteria included locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and previous treatment with gemcitabine. The study was a single arm phase II trial using a Simon 2-stage design. The primary endpoint was response rate, secondary endpoints included time to progression and overall survival. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled, 14 received treatment, and 12 were evaluable for response. The median age was 61, and the majority of patients were ECOG performance status 1. Grade 3 or greater adverse events included neutropenia (29%), fatigue (14%), peripheral neuropathy (7%) and thrombosis (7%). There were no complete or partial responses and therefore the study was closed after the first stage. The best response was stable disease in 5/12 (42%) of patients. Of these five patients, three had stable disease for 9 months or greater. Median time to progression was 1.4 months, and median overall survival was 6.1 months. Conclusion Eribulin was well tolerated but did not result in any objective responses in gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer. However, several patients had prolonged stable disease, suggesting that further studies of eribulin in pancreatic cancer may be warranted.     

A phase II open-label randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of selumetinib (AZD6244 [ARRY-142886]) versus capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who have failed first-line gemcitabine therapy

Selumetinib is a potent, selective MEK inhibitor with efficacy in several tumor models. This study compared selumetinib with capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had been pretreated with a gemcitabine-based regimen. In this randomized, multicenter phase II study (NCT00372944), patients received either 100 mg oral selumetinib twice daily or 1,250 mg/m² oral capecitabine twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week break, given in 3-weekly cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. In all 70 patients were randomized. The median survival was 5.4 months in the selumetinib group and 5.0 months in the capecitabine group (hazard ratio 1.03; two-sided 80% confidence interval = 0.68,1.57; P = 0.92). Disease progression events occurred in 84% and 88% of patients in the selumetinib and capecitabine treatment groups, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) were commonly observed in both treatment groups. Other frequently reported adverse events were acneiform dermatitis and peripheral edema with selumetinib, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia with capecitabine. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between selumetinib and capecitabine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Selumetinib was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile.     

A phase II open-label trial of apomine (SR-45023A) in patients with refractory melanoma

Summary Metastatic melanoma continues to be a very difficult disease to treat. Options are limited and often have very little impact on the course of the disease. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuously administered Apomine (SR-45023A), a novel bisphosphonate, in patients with previously treated metastatic malignant melanoma. Adult patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma received Apomine 100 mg orally, twice daily (total dose 200 mg per day) continuously for 28 days (defined as a cycle). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 42 patients received at least one dose of Apomine. Stable disease was achieved in 2 patients (5%). No complete or partial responses were observed. Progression free survival of at least 16 weeks was observed in 6 patients (14%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.9–9.4 months). Time to treatment failure was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.6–1.8 months) with Apomine therapy. By cycle 2, Apomine concentrations reached steady-state. Apomine was well tolerated with only 37% of patients experiencing any drug-related event. Abdominal pain was the most frequent adverse event occurring in 26% of patients. In conclusion, Apomine, at the current dose studied, failed to produce a 30% progression free survival rate at 16 weeks considered to be a meaningful benefit for further development.     

Phase II trial of interferon and thalidomide in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Summary Objectives: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of interferon and thalidomide combination in a phase II clinical trial. Patients and methods: Eligibility included metastatic renal cancer with a maximum of two prior regimens, performance status of 0‐2 and adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled on this phase II trial. Median age was 60.5 years (Range: 39–75 years). 17 patients had visceral metastases (lung/liver/both) and 3 patients had lymph node only metastases. A total of 26 cycles of 4 weeks each were administered; median of 1 cycle and range from 0‐9 cycles. The therapy was poorly tolerated with grade 3 adverse events noted in 12 (60%) of the 20 patients. No objective responses were noted. Of the 14 response evaluable patients, one had an unconfirmed response (38% decrease in size) and one had prolonged disease stabilization for 10 months. The median time to progression was 1.0 month and median survival was 2.8 months. Pre and post therapy PET scans were performed nine weeks apart on one patient. The mean standardized uptake values (SUV) declined from 1.45 (SUV min-max 0.89–1.76) to 1.12 (SUV min-max 0.55–1.47), denoting anti vascular effect. The patient did not have an objective response but had a disease stabilization sustained for 10 months. Conclusion: The combination of interferon and thalidomide has minimal efficacy and considerable toxicity which makes this combination unworthy of future investigation in metastatic renal cancer.     

Phase II trial of R115777 (NSC #70818) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group study

Summary Purpose: The purpose of this Phase II multi-institutional trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of R115777 in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients and methods: Patients were required to have histologically confirmed colorectal cancer with distant metastatic disease that was not surgically curable. They could not have received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. R115777 was given at a dose of 300 mg p.o. twice a day for 21days every 28 days until tumor progression or toxicity or other reason for discontinuation occurred. The primary endpoint was to determine the confirmed response probability with this treatment. Results: There were 55 eligible patients accrued to the study. There were no complete responses, but one confirmed partial response for a confirmed response probability of 2% (95%CI 0–10%). Three additional patients had an unconfirmed partial response for an overall response probability of 7%. The time to treatment failure was 1.7 months and the estimated median survival was 8.1 months. One patient died of treatment related infection and there were 7 other patients with grade 4 toxicities consisting of neutropenia, leukopenia, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, depression, increased bilirubin, anemia, and pneumonitis/infiltrates. Conclusion: R115777 given as a single agent by this dose and schedule is ineffective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.