Evaluation of amonafide in disseminated malignant melanoma

Amonafide (AMF), NSC 308847 is an investigational anticancer drug acting as a DNA intercalating agent. This paper presents results of a phase II clinical study of AMF in disseminated malignant melanoma. Twenty patients, eleven males and nine females, with biopsy proven malignant melanoma, performance status 0–2; median age 59 (range 29–74), and no previous chemotherapy, were treated with AMF 300 mg/m²/day by 60 min I.V. infusion for five days repeated every three weeks. Fifteen patients had lung (9 patients) and/or liver (8 patients) involvement. None had known brain metastasis at entry. All 20 patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. Six patients had stable disease and fourteen had increasing disease. With 0/20 responses, the upper 95% confidence limit for the response rate was 14%. The median survival time was 5.7 months. Hematologic toxicity was dose limiting with the incidence of leucopenia 45% and thrombocytopenia 20%. The nonhematologic toxicities included nausea and vomiting (60%), alopecia (20%), headaches (15%), diarrhea (10%), and phlebitis (10%). We conclude that AMF administered at this dose and schedule is not active in the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma, previously untreated with chemotherapy.     

Phase II Study of Perifosine in Previously Untreated Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Summary Purpose: To assess the response rate and toxicity of the alkylphosphocholine analogue, perifosine, in patients with metastatic or recurrent malignant melanoma. Patients and Methods: Patients had histologically proven, unidimensionally measurable disease which was incurable by standard therapy. Prior adjuvant immunotherapy was allowed but patients had not received prior chemotherapy. Perisfosine was given orally as a loading dose of 900 mg on day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of 150 mg po on days 2–21 in a 28 day cycle. The loading dose was 300 mg on day 1 of all subsequent cycles. Tumour response was assessed every 2 cycles. Results: 18 patients were accrued over 7 mos. No objective responses occurred in the 14 evaluable patients. Three patients (21%) achieved stable disease after 2 cycles and 11 had progression. Seventeen patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities included: diarrhea (12%), arthralgia (12%), nausea (6%), headache (6%), and fatigue (6%). No grade 3 or 4 hematological or biochemical toxicity were observed. Seventy-seven percent of patients received ≥90% of planned cycle 1 dose intensity and 58% received ≥90% of planned dose for cycle 2+. Four patients required dose reductions; treatment was delayed in 5 patients; and 5 patients missed doses because of toxicity. Conclusions: Perifosine can be safely administered when given as an initial loading dose followed by daily maintenance therapy over 28 days. Gastrointestinal toxicity is common but generally of low grade. Hematological toxicity is minimal. No objective responses were observed. No further development of single-agent perifosine is recommended in malignant melanoma.     

Phase II trial of pegylated interferon and thalidomide in malignant metastatic melanoma

Pegylated interferon and thalidomide demonstrate immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic activity, and efficacy in melanoma. The combination was evaluated in a phase II trial. Eligibility included biopsy-confirmed malignant melanoma with metastases and progression, maximum of two earlier systemic therapies, performance status of 0-2, and adequate hepatic, bone marrow and renal function. Pegylated interferon was administered at a dose of 0.5 microg/kg subcutaneously weekly and thalidomide 200 mg orally daily. Toxicity was evaluated every 2 weeks and response every 8 weeks. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this trial. Median age was 55.5 years (range: 29-80 years). Seventeen patients had visceral metastases and one had lymph node-only metastases. Two patients had brain metastases. Nine patients had received earlier adjuvant therapy and 16 patients had received earlier therapy for metastatic disease. Performance status was 0, 1 and 2 in 11, six and one patients, respectively. Severe (grade 4) toxicities observed were anemia in two patients and thrombocytopenia in one patient. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Dose escalation of thalidomide to 300 mg daily was feasible in four patients. One therapy-related hospitalization for nausea and dehydration occurred. No objective responses were noted; three patients demonstrated disease stabilization. The regimen of pegylated interferon and thalidomide was well tolerated. The combination, however, failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy in pretreated metastatic malignant melanoma.     

Phase I clinical trial of weekly docetaxel and exisulind, a novel inducer of apoptosis

Summary Background: The objective of this phase I study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of weekly docetaxel and exisulind in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors were treated with intravenous weekly docetaxel with daily oral exisulind. The following dose levels (docetaxel/exisulind) were explored: 30-mg/m²/200 mg po bid, 35/200, 35/250 and 40/250. Docetaxel was administered weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks off, and exisulind was taken twice daily. Each cycle was 8 weeks. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study. All of them had received prior systemic therapy. Most patients had either melanoma or carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract. A total of 31 cycles of therapy were administered. DLTs were grade 3 diarrhea, anorexia and fatigue and grade 3 cutaneous toxicity at dose level 4 (40/250). Myelosuppression was mild. Fatigue and gastrointestinal toxicity (anorexia, dyspepsia, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea) represented the most common toxicities. However, grade 3 and grade 4 toxicities were uncommon. There were no treatment related deaths. No objective responses were observed and five patients achieved stable disease. Conclusions: The recommended dose for phase II studies is weekly docetaxel 35 mg/m² for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks off in combination with oral exisulind 250 mg po bid. This combination is feasible and well-tolerated at these doses.     

Evaluation of merbarone (NSC 336628) in disseminated malignant melanoma

Merbarone, NSC 336628, is an investigational anticancer drug with activity against experimental animal tumors including melanoma. This paper presents results of a Phase II clinical study of merbarone in patients with biopsy proven stage IV malignant melanoma without prior chemotherapy and with no evidence of CNS involvement. Thirty-five patients with median age 58 (range 27–81), with performance status 0–2 were treated with merbarone 1000 mg/m²/day for five days by intravenous continuous infusion repeated every 3 weeks. All patients (21 males and 14 females) were evaluable for toxicity. Two patients were not evaluable for response having been removed from protocol treatment due to toxicity and received other treatment during the first course of chemotherapy. Among the evaluable patients there was one complete response in a supraclavicular lymph node lasting four months and one partial liver response lasting three months. The remaining thirty-one patients were non-reponders. Of these one had a stable disease lasting 21 months. The overall objective response rate was 6% (2/35) with a 95% confidence interval of 1%–19%. Twenty-six of the 35 patients have died. The estimated median survival of the entire group was 9 months with a 95% confidence interval of six to eleven months. Renal toxicity was dose-limiting and manifested as increasing serum creatinine (54% of patients), proteinuria (51%) and hematuria (9%). One patient experienced grade 4 creatinine increase, proteinuria and acute renal failure. Other toxicities included nausea (71%), vomiting (51%), malaise (23%), weakness (20%), alopecia (17%), diarrhea (17%), anorexia (14%), transaminase (SGOT, SGPT) increase (14%), constipation (14%), alkaline phosphatase or 5nucleotidase increase (9%), and fever (9%). Hematologictoxicity (granulocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia) was generally mild and infrequent (29%, only one patient had grade 4 granulocytopenia). Overall 9 patients (26%) had at least one grade 3 toxicity. We conclude that merbarone at this dose and schedule has detectable but minimal activity in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma and given the significant renal toxicity this schedule does not merit further evaluation in this disease.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

In this phase II study, the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine were studied in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen in an adjuvant setting. Ten patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (67%) had visceral disease spread at entry. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The mean number of completed cycles was 3.9 and the mean dose delivered was 942.2 mg/m2. Ninety-seven percent of injections were administered as assigned. No complete responses were observed, but there were six partial responses and 24 patients with stable disease lasting 2-9 months. The overall response rate was 14.3% (95% CI 5.4-28.5%). The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. Maximum WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in five patients for nausea and vomiting, one patient for diarrhea, one patient for pain, seven patients for alanine transaminase, and eight patients for segmented neutrophils. There were no grade 3 and 4 toxicities for alopecia. These data confirm modest single-agent gemcitabine activity in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Gemcitabine's favorable toxicity profile makes it an ideal candidate for combination chemotherapy.     

Phase I dose escalation study of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Our aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin. Twenty-eight chemo-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. Oxaliplatin (55, 70, 85, 100 and 115 mg/m2) was given as a 2-h infusion on days 1 and 15. Oral tegafur-uracil (300 mg/m2 per day) and leucovorin (60 mg/day) were given 3 times a day from days 1 to 21 (28-day cycle). DLTs were defined as grade IV hematologic toxicity or grade III non-hematologic toxicity. The MTD for oxaliplatin was 100 mg/m2. The most common DLT was diarrhea. Major grade III/IV toxicities included vomiting, diarrhea, renal dysfunction, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. There were two treatment-related deaths. Intent-to-treat response was graded as partial response in 13 patients (46.4%; 95% confidence interval 26.74-66.12%), stable disease in nine and disease progression in five. As of June 2004, 17 patients had died. The median time to treatment failure, time to progression and overall survival were 124, 308 and 434 days, respectively. The recommended dose for the phase II study is oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 biweekly with oral tegafur-uracil (300 mg/m2 per day) and leucovorin (60 mg/day) 3 times a day for 21 days.     

A phase II study of ispinesib (SB-715992) in patients with metastatic or recurrent malignant melanoma: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group trial

Summary To assess the response rate and toxicity of the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor, ispinesib, in malignant melanoma. Seventeen patients were enrolled from April to November 2005. Ispinesib was administered as a 1-hour infusion at a dose of 18 mg/m² once every 3 weeks until disease progression. No objective responses were seen. Six patients (35%) had a best response of stable disease for a median duration of 2.8 months. Disease progression was documented in 9 (53%) after 1 or 2 cycles. Eighty-eight percent of patients received ≥90% of planned dose intensity. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included dizziness (1) and blurred vision (1). There was one episode of febrile neutropenia, but no grade 3 or 4 biochemical adverse events. Pharmacokinetics was consistent with prior studies. KSP immunoreactivity was seen in 14 of 16 available archival tissue samples (88%). Ispinesib can be safely administered using the dose and schedule employed, with mild hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity. No objective responses were observed, and further development of single-agent ispinesib in malignant melanoma is not recommended. Although KSP expression appears to be common in melanoma, KSP may not be a suitable target for its treatment.     

Phase II trial of vinorelbine tartrate in patients with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma

Metastatic melanoma carries a dismal prognosis and there is a need to develop new treatment strategies. Vinca alkaloids have shown consistent activity in melanoma patients, as monotherapy and as part of combination regimens. The current study evaluates the clinical activity and tolerability of vinorelbine as first-line monotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were eligible if they presented metastatic melanoma not amenable to curative resection, had received no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease and had an adequate performance status (ECOG 0-1). Patients received vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, on an outpatient basis. Thirteen patients were accrued into the study and received 64 cycles. All patients were assessable for response, toxicity and survival. No objective responses were documented, for an overall response rate of 0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-19%] and the trial was terminated in accordance to the predetermined early discontinuation rule. The median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI 2.3-4.3 months) and the estimated median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI 6.0-10.2 months). No life-threatening toxicities occurred. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, but none of the three episodes of grade 3-4 neutropenia were complicated by infection. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were asthenia, nausea, neuropathy and myalgia. We conclude that vinorelbine as a single agent on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle has a favorable toxicity profile, but appears to have no relevant clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib, and concurrent 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and radiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer: a phase I study

This phase I trial investigates the safety of combining radiation, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib, in patients with esophageal carcinoma. From April 2000 to January 2005, 11 patients with squamous or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were enrolled. Patients received either 50, 100 or 150 mg oral erlotinib/day beginning on the first day of radiation (three patients in each dose cohort). Concurrent cisplatin (75 mg/m2 i.v., days 8 and 36) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2 i.v., days 8-11 and 36-39) were also given with 50.4 Gy thoracic radiation, delivered at 180 cGy/day, 5 days/week. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3.0). Erlotinib with concurrent 5-FU, cisplatin and thoracic radiation was well-tolerated at 50, 100 and 150 mg/day. The major toxicities were diarrhea (grade 1=18%, grade 2=18%), skin rash (grade 4=54.5%), nausea (grade 1=18%, grade 2=54%, grade 3=9%) and dehydration (grade 3=27%). All patients experienced esophagitis during treatment (grade 1=55%, grade 2=32%, grade 3=9%, grade 4=9%). Two patients were discontinued from the study secondary to non-erlotinib-related toxicities. We conclude that the phase I study demonstrates the safety and tolerability of erlotinib delivered at 150 mg/day with concurrent 5-FU, cisplatin and thoracic radiation. The major toxicities encountered were grade 1-2 diarrhea, grade 1 skin rash, grade 1-3 nausea and grade 3 dehydration. A phase II study is planned.     

Hydroxyurea modulates 5-fluorouracil antineoplastic activity in advanced head and neck carcinoma pretreated with chemotherapy.

After informed consent 21 patients with advanced head and neck cancer resistant to folinic acid/5-fluorouracil (FA/5FU + cisplatin) were treated with weekly FA/5FU plus low dose hydroxyurea (HU) to evaluate if HU could further modulate 5FU antineoplastic activity. Five patients achieved a partial response (23.8%) which was short-lived (mean duration 6.5 months). Three patients (14%) had stable disease and 13 (62%) progressed. Among responders, four patients had epidermoidal carcinoma and one had clear cell carcinoma. Treatment was well tolerated and 5FU-related toxicity was not apparently worsened by the addition of HU. The most frequent toxicities were nausea/vomiting (81%), diarrhea (52%) and leukopenia (57%). Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and leukopenia were recorded in only 19 and 9% of cases, respectively. One patient had grade 1 cutaneous toxicity and a second patient showed a hand-foot syndrome. These results suggest that HU may further positively modulate 5FU antineoplastic activity.     

A phase II study of cell cycle inhibitor UCN-01 in patients with metastatic melanoma: a California Cancer Consortium trial

Background Genetic abnormalities in cell cycle control are common in malignant melanoma. UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine) is an investigational agent that exhibits antitumor activity by perturbing the cancer cell cycle. A patient with advanced melanoma experienced a partial response in a phase I trial of single agent UCN-01. We sought to determine the activity of UCN-01 against refractory metastatic melanoma in a phase II study. Patients and methods Patients with advanced melanoma received UCN-01 at 90 mg/m² over 3 h on cycle 1, reduced to 45 mg/m² over 3 h for subsequent cycles, every 21 days. Primary endpoint was tumor response. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A two-stage (17 + 16), single arm phase II design was employed. A true response rate of ≥20% (i.e., at least one responder in the first stage, or at least four responders overall) was to be considered promising for further development of UCN-01 in this setting. Results Seventeen patients were accrued in the first stage. One patient was inevaluable for response. Four (24%) patients had stable disease, and 12 (71%) had disease progression. As there were no responders in the first stage, the study was closed to further accrual. Median PFS was 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.2–3.0) while median OS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.4–18.4). One-year and two year OS rates were 41% and 12%, respectively. A median of two cycles were delivered (range, 1–18). Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities include hyperglycemia (N = 2), fatigue (N = 1), and diarrhea (N = 1). One patient experienced grade 4 creatinine elevation and grade 4 anemia possibly due to UCN-01. No dose modification was required as these patients had disease progression. Conclusion Although well tolerated, UCN-01 as a single agent did not have sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in refractory melanoma.     

Phase I study of temsirolimus in combination with EKB-569 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose Activation of EGFR can stimulate proliferative and survival signaling through mTOR. Preclinical data demonstrates synergistic activity of combined EGFR and mTOR inhibition. We undertook a phase I trial of temsirolimus (T, an mTOR inhibitor) and EKB-569 (E, an EGFR inhibitor) to determine the safety and tolerability. Methods The primary aim was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination in adults with solid tumors. Following the dose-escalation phase, (Cohort A), two subsequent cohorts were used to assess any pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between the agents. Results Forty eight patients were enrolled. The MTD of this combination was E, 35 mg daily and T, 30 mg on days 1-3 and 15-17 using a 28-day cycle. The most common toxicities were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, stomatitis, rash, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Sixteen patients (36%) had at least one grade 3 toxicity. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea, dehydration, and nausea and vomiting (19% each). No grade 5 events were seen. Four patients had a partial response and 15 had stable disease. Clinical benefit was seen across a range of tumor types and in all cohorts. PK analysis revealed no significant interaction between E and T. Conclusions This combination of agents is associated with tolerable toxicities at doses that induced responses. PK studies revealed no interaction between the drugs. Further investigations of this targeting strategy may be attractive in renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, alveolar sarcoma, and carcinoid tumor.     

Weekly docetaxel in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial

Docetaxel has consistently demonstrated its high activity as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. However, 90% of patients receiving the recommended dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks will develop grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Recent data suggest that the safety profile of a weekly docetaxel regimen compared favorably with the standard 3-week schedule. Thus, we initiated a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty patients with advanced, anthra-cycline-refractory breast cancer were included in this phase II trial. Docetaxel was administered at a starting dose of 40 mg/m2, repeated once a week for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest period (1 cycle). Patients were evaluated for tumor response every 8 weeks (after every other cycle). Therapy was continued for a maximum of six courses in patients showing tumor response or stable disease. Twenty patients received a total of 204 weekly infusions of docetaxel. The mean number of treatments was 10.2 (range 1-18). Eighteen patients were assessable for response. Five patients achieved a partial response and six patients showed either stable disease or a minor response. Seven patients had disease progression. The median survival was 7.8 months. Grade 3/4 leukopenia occurred in two patients. No other grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were observed. The following grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen: nausea/vomiting (one patient), infection (one patient), mucositis (two patients) and diarrhea (one patient). Three patients withdrew from the study due to dose-limiting toxicities (one due to severe neutropenia and two due to mucositis). We conclude that administration of docetaxel at a dose of 40 mg/m2 was effective and well tolerated even in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. This regimen is associated with only mild myelosuppression.     

A phase I study of temsirolimus and metformin in advanced solid tumours

The purpose of this phase I trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose and define the dose-limiting toxicities of a combination of temsirolimus and metformin. Patients with advanced solid tumours who had exhausted standard treatment options were eligible. Treatment included weekly intravenous temsirolimus and daily oral metformin. Eleven patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in all patients at the initial dose level of 25 mg weekly of temsirolimus and metformin 500 mg po BID. At dose level -1, 2 of 8 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Toxicities included grade 4 pneumonitis, persistent grade 3 fatigue, and thrombocytopenia requiring dose delays. The maximum tolerated dose (level -1) was 20 mg temsirolimus weekly and 500 mg po daily of metformin. One patient with head and neck cancer experienced a partial response. Five patients had stable disease including a patient with melanoma who had stable disease for 22 months.     

Irinotecan (CPT-11) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU): a phase II study

The efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) 350 mg/m(2) i.v. once every 3 weeks was assessed in 60 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) showing failure to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment. The overall objective response rate was 13.6% (1 complete response and 4 partial responses) and 25 patients (42.4%) showed stable disease; the median time to disease progression was 4.4 months and the median survival was 10.5 months. The main non-hematological toxicities were alopecia (80.3% of patients), diarrhea (75.0%), and nausea/vomiting (71.7%); neutropenia was the main hematological toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea appeared in 21 of 131 cycles (16.1%), whereas grade 3 or 4 neutropenia appeared in 78 cycles (25.0%). In conclusion, the present phase II study confirms that CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is active and well tolerated as second-line chemotherapy for CRC in 5-FU resistant patients.     

Phase I trial of weekly cisplatin,irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer

Summary   Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and suitable dose for weekly 1-h paclitaxel combined with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan to treat advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. Methods: Thirty patients with metastatic or locally advanced (unresectable or recurrent) gastrointestinal solid tumors were enrolled on this single-center, phase I study. Patients were treated with paclitaxel given over 1h at 1 of 4 dose levels (40, 50, 65, or 80 mg/m²). Paclitaxel was followed by fixed doses of cisplatin (30 mg/m²) and irinotecan (50 mg/m²). All treatment was administered sequentially, once a week, in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as a 2-week delay in treatment for grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, neutropenic fever, a 1-week delay for grade 4 hematologic toxicity, or a 2-week delay for grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Results: Thirty patients were recruited; 28 patients were assessable for safety. Most of the patients (70%) had no prior chemotherapy. The primary first-cycle DLTs were neutropenia, diarrhea, and nausea. Paclitaxel at 65 mg/m² was defined as the MTD. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities observed during all cycles were neutropenia (57%), febrile neutropenia (11%), diarrhea (29%), fatigue (29%), and nausea (18%). No patients had G-CSF (Neupogen, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) support. Responses were observed in gastric, esophageal, and pancreatic cancers. Conclusion: Paclitaxel at 65 mg/m², cisplatin (30 mg/m²), and irinotecan (50 mg/m²) given weekly can be safely administered to patients with solid tumor malignancies. To improve cumulative toxicities, a schedule modification was required (3-week cycle; 2-on, 1-off) Neutropenia was the most common DLT. This combination showed substantial activity, particularly in patients with gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma, and phase II evaluation could be considered.     

Phase II study of oral bis (aceto) ammine dichloro (cyclohexamine) platinum (IV) (JM-216, BMS-182751) given daily x 5 in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

JM-216 is an orally bioavailable platinum compound with activity against many tumor models. The objective of this study was to determine the safety profile and anti-tumor activity of JM-216 in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) when given orally daily x 5 days. In this open label phase II study JM-216 was administered orally at the dose of 120 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks. Patients continued on the therapy until evidence of disease progression or intolerable toxicity developed. Dose escalation and de-escalation were allowed according to patient's tolerance. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study and received a total of 155 courses (median 2, range 1-16) of JM-216. Dose delays (77% of courses) and dose reductions (31% of courses) were common and were mainly due to myelosupression. Treatment was discontinued in 5 patients due to treatment related toxicities. One patient developed myelodysplastic syndrome 11 months after the start of treatment. The most frequent grade III or higher adverse events included thrombocytopenia (54%), neutropenia (52%), anemia (24%) nausea (13%), vomiting (16%) and diarrhea (28%). PSA response was assessed in 32 patients, 10 (26%) had partial response, 14 (36%) had stable disease while PSA progression was seen in 8 (21%) patients. Of 20 (54%) patients with measurable disease two patients had a documented partial response. Although JM-216 had moderate activity in HRPC when given on daily basis for 5 days, it is associated with significant treatment related toxicities in this patient population.     

Phase II evaluation of amonafide in renal cell carcinoma

Summary Twenty four patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated in a phase II trial with amonafide 300–450 mg/m²/day on days 1–5 every 21 days. There were no responders, 6 patients had stable disease, 14 experienced progressive disease and 4 were assumed to be non-responders as no evaluation was performed. There were no fatal toxicities although 8 patients had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, 1 patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea in 1 patient, grade 3 myopathy in 1 patient, severe nausea and vomiting in 1 patient and a facial rash, possibly a hypersensitivity reaction, in 1 patient. The median survival is 7.5 months. At this dosage and schedule, there is no evidence that amonafide has meaningful anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Address for offprints: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG- 8716), Operations Office, 5430 Fredericksburg Road, Suite #618, San Antonio, TX 78229-6197, USA     

Pooled efficacy analysis from a phase I-II study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Development of treatments to improve the outcomes achieved with single-agent gemcitabine therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer remains a research priority. G-FLIP (gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin) is a four-drug regimen designed to maximize sequence-dependent synergy, while attempting to minimize toxicity among the four drugs. The dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan as part of the G-FLIP regimen have been published. For phase II testing, G-FLIP consisted of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m2 at a fixed rate of 10 mg/m2/min, irinotecan 120 mg/m2, bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg, followed by a 24-h 5-fluorouracil infusion of 1500 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 14 days. Thirty-three patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (22 men and 11 women) were treated and 31 were evaluable. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78 years) and median Karnofsky performance status score was 70-80. Estimated median time to disease progression was 171 days (6.1 months) and Kaplan-Meir-estimated median overall survival was 229 days (8.1 months). Twelve- and 18-month survivals were 33 and 21%, respectively. As per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, 13 patients had stable disease, seven (22%) attained a partial response, and 10 (32%) had disease progression. One patient attained a complete response and two were not evaluable (one withdrew consent and one died suddenly, each after cycle 1). Treatment generally was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 toxicities/patient were thrombocytopenia (3.1%), leukopenia (15%), neutropenia (21%), neutropenic fever (3%), fatigue (18%) and thrombosis (12.5%). Common grade 1-2 toxicities per patient included nausea/vomiting (69%), diarrhea (45%), constipation (21%) and fatigue (39%). In conclusion, G-FLIP is a feasible outpatient regimen with acceptable toxicity for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Disease control rate (stable disease rate plus partial or complete responses) and 1-year survival outcomes are encouraging.