Outbreak of gram-negative bacteremia and pyrogenic reactions in a hemodialysis center

During the period from April 4, 1988, to April 20, 1988, nine pyrogenic reactions and five gram-negative bacteremias occurred in 11 patients undergoing dialysis. All pyrogenic reactions and gram-negative bacteremias occurred among patients in whom a reprocessed dialyzer was used. The rate of pyrogenic reactions or bacteremias per 100 sessions using a reprocessed dialyzer was higher than in sessions during which a new dialyzer was used (4.5 vs. 0; p = 0.03). Dialyzers were manually reprocessed with 2.5% Renalin germicide. The Renalin concentrations varied widely in 12 dialyzers stored after manual reprocessing during the epidemic period (0.9-4.2%); the median endotoxin concentrations varied from 0 to 246 ng/ml and were higher in dialyzers with Renalin concentrations less than or equal to 1.0% than in dialyzers with higher concentrations (p = 0.01). Experiments using a dilution technique described by a technician resulted in Renalin concentrations ranging from 1.4% at the surface to 3.5% at the bottom of the preparation container. These findings suggest that failure to adequately admix Renalin during dilution may be associated with low levels of disinfectant, high levels of bacteria and endotoxins in dialyzers, and outbreaks of pyrogenic reactions and gram-negative bacteremias in dialysis patients.     

The Adequacy of Fragmin as a Single Bolus Dose with Reused Dialyzers

Abstract: Thirty-four hemodialysis patients were studied in a crossover fashion to compare the effectiveness of bolus-dose Fragmin (a low molecular weight heparin) with regular heparin usage in hemodialysis. For each anticoagulant, 3 dialyzes were studied for each patient; the first sessions involved a new dialyzer, and the subsequent sessions involved dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid. To assess the effectiveness of the anticoagulation regimens, the following were measured: the dialyzer fiber bundle volume and the instantaneous dialyzer clearances for urea (1 h into the second session). In addition, factor Xa levels were measured in 5 patients during the first and second sessions at 0 min, 30 min, and 4 h. Fiber bundle volumes were (in ml) 75.4 ± 8.8, 73.0 ± 8.9, and 73.5 ± 7.6 on first, second, and third uses with Fragmin (p = ns); and 77.8 ± 9.0, 73.4 ± 8.1, and 73.8 ± 8.1 with heparin (p < 0.001 second and third vs. first). Thus, there were no significant differences between Fragmin and heparin. Instantaneous dialyzer clearances were 165.8 ± 12.6ml/min with Fragmin and 163.8 ± 9.8 with heparin (p = ns). Factor Xa levels were 0 predialysis, 0.81 ± 0.17 U/ml at 30 min on first use, and 0.92 ± 0.09 U/ml on second use (p = ns); they were 0.51 ± 0.21 U/ml at 4 h on first use and 0.61 ± 0.16 U/ml on second use (p = ns). Thus, bolus-dose Fragmin provided similar results to constant infusion heparin and is not deleteriously influenced by reprocessing dialyzers with peracetic acid.     

Effect of Reuse on Dialyzer Efficacy

The effect of reuse on dialyzer efficacy was examined by measuring blood compartment volume and dialyzer mass transfer coefficient (maximum dialyzer clearance) as a function of dialyzer use number. The 102 polysulfone dialyzers tested (F60 and HF80, Fresenius) were reprocessed on Renatron machines using peroxyacetic acid as the dual cleansing and sterilizing agent. Each dialyzer was used an average of 14.4 +/- 5.7SD times and was tested once (twice for 13/102 dialyzers) during a routine dialysis session at an arbitrary use number (7.6 +/- 5.3; range 1 to 24). The parameters tested were found to decrease only marginally with reuse, corresponding to a blood compartment volume loss of approximately 1% (R = 0.04) over a 5-week/15-use period and a decrease in dialyzer mass transfer coefficient of approximately 3% (R = 0.07 and 0.06) over the same period for urea and creatinine, respectively. It was concluded that the loss in dialyzer efficacy is negligible over the average use period of almost 5 weeks per dialyzer.     

Severe dialyzer dysfunction undetectable by standard reprocessing validation tests

It is generally accepted that careful monitoring of total cell volume and ultrafiltration rates will ensure adequate function of reprocessed dialyzers. During routine urea kinetic measurements we noted that the percent of patients with clearances less than 200 ml/min increased from 5% to 48% despite adherence to these validation tests. As these patients did not have evidence of recirculation in the vascular access, possible causes of dialyzer dysfunction were investigated. Injection of methylene blue into the dialysate port revealed non-uniform flow of dialysate in dialyzers from patients with markedly reduced clearances. In vitro studies of dialyzers subjected to sequential daily reprocessing, without patient exposure, demonstrated that in vitro clearances declined in one lot but not another. The initial clearances of 218 +/- 4 ml/min fell progressively to 112 +/- 18 (P less than 0.001) after 15 reuses. No effects of reprocessing were found in a different lot (230 +/- 2 vs. 226 +/- 4 ml/min). Soaking the dialyzers from the affected lot in either the disinfectant or dialysate solution caused a decline in the clearances which was less than that of serial reuse. Although the magnitude of the problem of dialyzer malfunction with reuse is unknown, careful attention to dialyzer function is warranted in patients treated with reprocessed dialyzers.     

Relationship between dialyzer reuse and the presence of anti-N-like antibodies in chronic hemodialysis patients.

One hundred eleven chronic hemodialysis patients from five dialysis units were tested for the presence of antibodies reactive with red blood cell N substance; 77 patients were available for follow-up study after 18 to 24 months. Initially, 18 patients (16%) had serum anti-N-like antibodies. Thirteen of these patients were in a home dialysis program and were reusing hollow fiber dialyzers. The other five had practiced hollow fiber dialyzer reuse in the past. None of 37 patients using coil dialyzers had anti-N-like antibody. On follow-up testing, anti-N-like antibody persisted in all patients restudied except for one who had a successful renal transplant. Anti-N-like antibodies developed in four additional patients: three were reusing hollow fiber dialyzers at the time, but one had not reused dialyzers for 24 months. Statistical analyses indicated that dialyzer reuse, hollow fiber dialyzers, and home dialysis were significantly related to the presence of anti-N-like antibodies. We interpret the clinical and statistical data to indicate that dialyzer reuse is the major clinical factor in the development of anti-N-like antibody. The likely mechanism involves the prolonged exposure of red cells trapped in the dialyzer to formaldehyde used in preparing dialyzers for reuse. No adverse clinical effects of anti-N-like antibodies were evident in our patients, but hemolysis and acute transplant failure have been reported by others.     

Plate, Coil, and Hollow-Fiber Cuprammonium Cellulose Dialyzers: Discrepancy Between Incidence of Anaphylactic Reactions and Degree of Complement Activation

During the past 10 years, the incidence of severe anaphylactic reactions during dialysis [type A first-use syndrome (FUS)] at our center has been much lower when using cuprammonium cellulose plate (CC-P) dialyzers (0/37, 750 dialyses) or coil (CC-C) dialyzers (0/32, 500) than when using cuprammonium cellulose hollow-fiber (CC-F) dialyzers (8/21,022 dialyses, p less than 0.005 by Chi-square). To determine if the difference in type A FUS incidence between the three dialyzer types could be explained by differences in complement activation, we compared plasma concentrations of C3a des-arginine (des arg) in patients undergoing dialysis with these three varieties of dialyzers. Plasma C3a des arg values increased markedly in the dialyzer outflow blood with the three dialyzer configurations. The levels were similar with the dialyzer types when results were corrected for membrane surface area. Also, the degree of leukopenia was not markedly different with the three dialyzer types. Our findings suggest that complement activation per unit surface area is similar during dialysis with plate, coil, and hollow-fiber cuprammonium cellulose dialyzers. The lack of correlation between the degree of complement activation and the incidence of type A FUS suggests that membrane-induced complement activation is not of primary importance to type A dialyzer hypersensitivity reactions.     

Dialyzer Reuse: Interaction Between Dialyzer Membrane, Disinfectant (Formalin), and Blood During Dialyzer Reprocessing

Abstract: The growing practice of dialyzer reuse in recent years is mainly based on medical and economic considerations. However, adverse reactions such as immunohemolytic anemia due to anti-N_from antibody associated with dialyzer reuse have been reported. In this study, scanning electron microscopy and cytologic staining were used to evaluate the interaction between blood components and the reprocessed synthetic dialyzer membrane (polysulfone) after disinfectant (formaldehyde) treatment. The results showed that various blood components such as fibrin and blood cells still adhered to the dialyzer membrane after reprocessing. The study also demonstrated that the adhered denatured blood components could be detached by sonication andlor simulated hemodialysis and then gain access into the circulation. The re-entry of the denatured blood components to the patients exposed to reused dialyzers may result in an enhanced imrnunological response which may contribute to antibody formation (such as anti-N_from antibody) with a reused hemodialyzer.     

An Outbreak of Pyrogenic Reactions in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients Associated with Hemodialyzer Reuse

Abstract: In February 1992, 22 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis at an outpatient dialysis center experienced pyrogenic reactions (PR). The PR rate was significantly greater (p < 0.001) during the epidemic (February 3–5) than the pre-epidemic period (November 1, 1992-February 1, 1992). All patients with PR used dialyz-ers that had been manually reprocessed either on February 1 or 3. These dialyzers contained up to 120.8 EU/ml of endotoxin in the blood compartment. The only dialyzer reprocessed before February 1 that was available for analysis was found to contain no detectable endotoxin, while dialyzers reprocessed during the epidemic period contained a median endotoxin concentration of 52.8 EU/ ml. The bioburden of water used to prepare dialysate was in excess of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standard for water, ≤200 colony forming units (CFU)/ml. Samples of treated water collected in the reuse area were within AAMI standards at the time of the investigation (February 11 and February 26), but before the investigation, water samples were assayed with a culture method that could not detect micro-bial concentrations below 10³ CFU/ml. In addition, the treated water feed line to the disinfectant container may never have been disinfected. However, no samples were collected from this line during the investigation. This outbreak emphasizes the need to use water that meets the AAMI bacteriologic and endotoxin standards of ≤200 CFU/ml and/or 5 EU/ml, respectively, for reprocessing hemodialyzers and to ensure that appropriate culture techniques are used for treated water and dialysate.     

Dialyzer performance over prolonged reuse

Studies were performed in patients on maintenance hemodialysis to evaluate the role of prolonged dialyzer reuse in the management of end-stage renal disease. For this purpose the patients were dialyzed without interruption with the same hollow fiber dialyzers (GambroR 120M) reprocessed with the Lixivitron IIR equipment. The data obtained from in vivo clearances in sixteen patients demonstrate that membrane permeability to small solutes (urea, creatinine, phosphate) is maintained up to thirty dialyzer uses. In vitro studies confirmed this observation and established that clearances of larger solutes (vitamin B12) are also maintained over similar extensive dialyzer reuse. Hematological and blood gas studies were performed serially during dialysis in five additional patients. Although circulating leucocyte and neutrophil counts, hemoglobin concentration as well as arterial pH and partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide changed appropriately during dialysis, there was no observable difference from the first to the twentieth use of the same dialyzer. Thus, these results clearly demonstrate that prolonged dialyzer reuse in end-stage renal disease patients constitutes a stable form of renal replacement therapy provided adequate dialyzer reprocessing is applied.     

The effects of reprocessing cuprophane and polysulfone dialyzers on beta 2-microglobulin removal from hemodialysis patients

To further define the relationship between dialyzer reuse and the removal of beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) during dialysis, 26 patients who received hemodialysis were studied. Thirteen patients were dialyzed with conventional cuprophane dialyzers, and thirteen patients were dialyzed with high-flux polysulfone dialyzers. Patients in each group were dialyzed with only new dialyzers during the primary-use phase of the study, and reprocessed dialyzers during the reuse phase. Dialyzers were used six times during the reuse phase. Serum beta 2M levels were measured both predialysis and postdialysis, and adjusted for fluid loss. Dialysis with conventional cuprophane new dialyzers during the primary-use phase of the study resulted in a 3.3% increase in serum beta 2M levels, and a 2.4% increase in serum beta 2M levels during the reuse phase. The difference in the change of the concentration of beta 2M between primary-use and reuse phases was not statistically significant. Dialysis with high-flux polysulfone new dialyzers during the primary-use phase was associated with a decrease of 59.5% in the mean postdialysis concentration of serum beta 2M compared with the predialysis level. A corresponding decrease of 62.6% in serum beta 2M levels was observed after dialysis with high-flux polysulfone reprocessed dialyzers during the reuse phase. These data show no evidence of an adverse effect on the clearance of beta 2M during dialysis from the reuse of dialyzers up to six times. The results confirm previous studies that have reported that high-flux dialysis with polysulfone dialyzers removes substantial amounts of beta 2M, and dialysis with conventional cuprophane dialyzers does not.     

Effect of Dialyzer Reprocessing Methods on Complement Activation and Hemodialyzer-Related Symptoms

The effects of different dialyzer processing methods and of reuse on complement activation and dialyzer-related symptoms were studied in 96 maintenance hemodialysis patients. New dialyzers were either unprocessed (Group 1) or machine-washed with bleach and stored in formaldehyde (Group 2). Reused dialyzers were manually cleansed using the combination of bleach and formaldehyde (Group 3), or machine-washed in formaldehyde (Group 4) or peracetic acid (Group 5). Prewashed new dialyzers (Group 2) were associated with greater complement activation during dialysis when compared with unprocessed, new dialyzers (Group 1) (p less than 0.05). Reused, unbleached but formaldehyde-treated or peracetic acid-treated dialyzers (Groups 4 and 5) were associated with reduced complement activation (p less than 0.05). Complement activation was not reduced when bleach was used for reprocessing (Group 3). The percentage of patients without symptoms during dialysis was significantly greater with reused dialyzers than with new dialyzers (Groups 3 through 5 versus Groups 1 and 2; 39 versus 25%; p = 0.035). The severity of total symptoms correlated significantly (p = 0.0004) with complement activation. Our results suggest that total symptoms during dialysis are correlated with the degree of complement activation. However, trends in the data pertaining to chest pain suggest that factors other than complement activation may be important in the pathogenesis of some dialyzer-related symptoms.     

Dialyzer Reuse Following Manual Reprocessing with a New Sterilant, RenNew-D

Dialysis patients are at risk for toxicity from formaldehyde used in the reprocessing of dialyzers for reuse; therefore, replacing formaldehyde as a dialyzer sterilant would be advantageous. The potential for RenNew-D as a sterilizing agent was investigated in seven stable in-center hemodialysis patients over 20 consecutive dialyses with cuprammonium cellulose hollow-fiber dialyzers. Treatment with RenNew-D showed no toxicity to patients or dialyzers except for two blood leaks occurring in one patient. The mean number of dialyzer uses was 4.9. In all the dialyzers that passed functional testing small solute clearances were maintained with reuse. The ability of RenNew-D to improve the biocompatibility of reused dialyzers was documented with mean neutrophil counts falling to only 78% of initial values during first reuse of dialyzers processed with RenNew-D compared with a decrease in neutrophil count to 2% of initial values during first use of the same dialyzers. Our results suggest that RenNew-D may be a useful alternative to formaldehyde for the purpose of dialyzer reuse. A reuse procedure that includes processing with RenNew-D is associated with improved biocompatibility, possibly because of maintenance of the blood-derived membrane coating established during prior dialysis.     

High-flux dialysis lowers plasma leptin concentration in chronic dialysis patients

Leptin is a protein produced by fat cells and involved in body weight regulation. Plasma leptin is significantly higher in some hemodialysis (HD) patients than in normal controls. We examined the influence of dialyzer membrane biocompatibility and flux on elevated plasma leptin concentrations in hemodialysis patients. Employing a crossover design, leptin and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels were serially determined in eight chronic dialysis patients. Patients were dialyzed sequentially on low-flux cellulosic (TAF) dialyzers, low-flux (F8) polysulfone, high-flux (F80B) polysulfone, then low-flux polysulfone and cellulosic dialyzers again. Mean leptin concentrations were similar when low-flux polysulfone or cellulosic dialyzers were employed (141.9+/-24.2 microg/L versus 137.8+/-18.4 microg/L, respectively (P=NS). In contrast, leptin fell significantly on the high-flux polysulfone dialyzer (99.4+/-16.2 microg/L) compared with cellulosic (P < 0.005), and low-flux polysulfone dialyzers (P < 0.02). Leptin clearance by the high-flux polysulfone dialyzer was significantly higher than the low-flux dialyzers (50.4+/-21.5 v -9.6+/-10.3 mL/min; P=0.043), but did not account fully for the 30% decline in plasma leptin during the high-flux arm of the study. Concentrations of TNF-alpha were lower when high-flux polysulfone dialyzers were employed, but there was no correlation of individual TNF-alpha levels with leptin concentrations. High-flux dialysis lowers plasma leptin concentrations an average of 30%, but biocompatibility does not influence leptin levels. The decrease in plasma leptin on high-flux dialysis cannot be explained solely by enhanced clearance.     

Impact of bleach cleaning on the performance of dialyzers with polysulfone membranes processed for reuse using peracetic Acid

Dialyzer performance may change with reuse depending on whether or not the dialyzer is cleaned with bleach. Bleach is usually used in conjunction with formaldehyde as the germicide. Because few data are available for dialyzers cleaned with bleach and disinfected with peracetic acid, we examined dialyzer performance in a cross-over study of dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes reprocessed using bleach and peracetic acid or peracetic acid alone. Each dialyzer was used for a total of 16 treatments, or until it failed standard criteria for continued use. Urea, beta2-microglobulin, and albumin removal were determined during the first, second, seventh, and 16th use of each dialyzer. Urea removal did not differ between the two reprocessing methods and did not change with reuse. Overall, beta2-microglobulin removal remained unchanged in dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid alone, but tended to increase after the seventh use in dialyzers reprocessed with bleach and peracetic acid. Approximately 60% of beta2-microglobulin removal resulted from trapping of beta2-microglobulin at the dialyzer membrane. Albumin loss into the dialysate was clinically insignificant throughout the study with both reprocessing methods. These data show that the clearance of both small and large molecules by dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes is well maintained by reprocessing with peracetic acid and that additional cleaning with bleach has limited impact on performance.     

Anaphylactoid reactions in hemodialysis patients treated with the AN69 dialyzer.

During an 11 week period (May to July, 1990), we observed six anaphylactoid reactions (AR) in six different hemodialysis patients occurring at the onset of treatment with a new AN69 hollow-fiber dialyzer. Four patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation and one of these expired. Four patients were also receiving an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor while the other two were not on medication known to affect the renin-angiotensin system. Only patients treated with AN69 dialyzers were affected. A review of the literature indicated that out of 1087 patients reported, 72 patients were on the combination of an AN69 dialyzer and ACE inhibitor therapy and 41 (57%) demonstrated AR. Only two patients (0.4%; both from our series) treated with an AN69 dialyzer without ACE inhibitor therapy developed AR. AR did not occur in patients treated with a variety of other dialyzers during this 11 week period, with or without ACE inhibition. Possible causes for AR are discussed and include: (1.) blood-AN69 membrane interaction leading to the production of bradykinin and other vasodilators, the breakdown of which may be delayed by the presence of ACE inhibitors; (2.) hypersensitivity to ethylene oxide; (3.) passage of bacterial products from dialysate to blood; (4.) changes in membrane manufacturing specifications. Recommendations are proposed for the prevention and treatment of AR.     

Acute Anaphylactoid Reactions During Hemodialysis in France

A retrospective survey of anaphylactoid reactions during dialysis in France was conducted. In 52 of 112 hemodialysis units surveyed 111 patients who had suffered one or more anaphylactoid reactions during dialysis were identified. According to the Hamilton/Adkinson classification, in 31 patients reactions were minor, in 54 patients moderate, and in 26 patients severe. Four patients died of their reactions. A preponderance of reactions (75 and 11%) occurred with cuprammonium cellulose hollow-fiber and plate dialyzers, respectively. Severe dialyzer reactions were found to occur more frequently after the long (weekend) interdialytic interval. In an in vitro study, six brands of cuprammonium cellulose hollow-fiber dialyzers were rinsed with water and the eluates analyzed by size exclusion chromatography for contaminant particles. Substantial variation in the amount of extractable material was found between dialyzers of different brands, despite the fact that all dialyzers used membranes from the same manufacturer. Previous data by others has suggested that this extractable material is a derivative of cellulose. Results of our epidemiologic survey in France are similar to those previously reported in the United States and suggest an increased incidence of dialyzer reactions with ethylene oxide-sterilized cuprammonium cellulose dialyzers. The presence of cellulose-derived particles in the rinsing fluid of such dialyzers and the possible increased incidence of reactions after the long (weekend) interdialytic interval suggest that allergy to cellulose-derived particles eluted from cellulosic dialyzers may contribute to dialyzer hypersensitivity reactions.     

Pyrogenic reactions in patients receiving conventional, high-efficiency, or high-flux hemodialysis treatments with bicarbonate dialysate containing high concentrations of bacteria and endotoxin.

High-efficiency (HE) and high-flux (HF) hemodialysis are becoming increasingly popular methods for treating patients with chronic renal failure because they reduce the time required for dialysis treatment. HF and HE dialyzers require bicarbonate dialysate, often prepared from concentrates that can support bacterial growth with endotoxin production. There is a concern that endotoxins or bacteria may cross or interact at the membranes of these dialyzers, triggering the release of endogenous pyrogens (cytokines) by peripheral blood mononuclear cells to cause pyrogenic reactions (PR). To determine the incidence of PR and to examine the association between PR and levels of bacteria and endotoxin in dialysate, a cohort of patients receiving conventional, HE, or HF hemodialysis with bicarbonate dialysate and reprocessed dialyzers at three dialysis centers during a 12-month period was studied prospectively. All dialyzers underwent a test of membrane integrity before use. A total of 19 PR were identified among 18 patients in 26,877 hemodialysis treatments (0.7 PR/1,000 treatments). There was no significant difference in PR rates by treatment modality: conventional, 0.5 per 1,000 (7 PR/13,123 treatments) versus HE, 0.9 per 1,000 (9 PR/11,345) versus HF, 1.2 per 1,000 (3 PR/2,409) (P = 0.21; chi 2 test). Throughout the study period, bacterial counts for dialysate at each center significantly exceeded the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation's (AAMI) microbiologic standards for dialysate of less than 2,000 CFU/mL (mean, 19,000 CFU/mL), but water used in the reuse of dialyzers tested less than 200 CFU/mL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A Quality and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Dialyzer Reuse in Hemodialysis Patients

Background. To evaluate the benefits of dialyzer reuse for hemodialysis (HD) patients, including the cost of HD treatment and patient's survival, a comparison was made regarding the standard practice of single-use dialysis. Methods. From January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2005, a total of 128,232 successive HD treatments in 822 patients in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center were included in this study. Results. Approximately 54.25% (446/822) of patients reused dialyzers. The average times of dialyzer reuse was 2.54. The annual hollow fiber cost is reduced by $241,054.08 U.S. dollars (NT $7,834,257.60). The annual cost of hollow fiber was reduced by $540.48 U.S. dollars (NT $17,565.60) in one patient with dialyzer reuse. The mortality rates in dialyzer reuse and single use groups were 3.1% and 10.9% within one year (p < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regressions showed that single use compared with reuse was associated with higher mortality after adjusting co-morbid conditions including age, diabetes mellitus, etc. Conclusions. We concluded that the benefits of dialyzer reuse included safety in our center and reduction in cost during a 12-month period. Dialyzer reuse may be a safe alternative.     

Evaluation with micro‐CT of different anticoagulation strategies during hemodialysis in patients with thrombocytopenia: A randomized crossover study

In patients with enhanced risk for bleeding, heparin‐free hemodialysis (HD) with conventional dialyzers is routinely used. To explore the potential benefit of using heparin‐coated dialyzers, we used a reference CT‐scanning technique and registered different clotting parameters to quantify coagulation with heparin‐coated versus non‐coated dialyzers. Six HD patients with thrombocytopenia were dialyzed 240 min in a randomized crossover study with Evodial 1.3 or FX600 Cordiax, each without anticoagulation. Blood samples were taken from the vascular access predialysis, and from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 5 and 240 min after dialysis start. Predialysis blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin, hematocrit, thrombocytes, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. On dialyzer inlet and outlet blood samples, a viscoelastic measurement of blood coagulation was performed using a Sonoclot analyzer. After dialysis, dialyzers were visually scored, subsequently dried for 24 h, weighed, and scanned with micro‐CT at a resolution of 25 µm. After image reconstruction, the open, non‐coagulated fibers were counted in a representative cross‐section at the dialyzer outlet. No sessions were terminated prematurely for circuit clotting. Heparin‐coated dialyzers had more patent fibers on micro‐CT versus non‐coated dialyzers and also had a better score of subjective visual assessment of fiber clotting. There was no difference in subjective assessment of clotting at the venous drip chamber. With both dialyzers, all ACT values remained in the normal range, and were lower at the dialyzer outlet versus inlet. In conclusion, dialysis with a heparin‐coated versus non heparin‐coated membrane results in substantially less coagulated fibers during 4 h hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation. Eventual leaching of heparin, immobilized on the fiber membrane, does not result in measurable systemic anticoagulation.     

Computational Evaluation of Dialysis Fluid Flow in Dialyzers With Variously Designed Jackets

Dialyzer performance strongly depends on the flow of blood and dialysis fluid as well as membrane performance. It is necessary, particularly to optimize dialysis fluid flow, to develop a highly efficient dialyzer. The objective of the present study is to evaluate by computational analysis the effects of dialyzer jacket baffle structure, taper angle, and taper length on dialysis fluid flow. We modeled 10 dialyzers of varying baffle angles (0, 30, 120, 240, and 360°) with and without tapers. We also modeled 30 dialyzers of varying taper lengths (0, 12.5, 25.0, and 50.0 mm) and angles (0, 2, 4, and 6°) based on technical data of APS-SA dialyzers having varying surface areas of 0.8, 1.5, and 2.5 m² (Rexeed). Dialysis fluid flow velocity was calculated by the finite element method. The taper part was divided into 10 sections of varying fluid resistances. A pressure of 0 Pa was set at the dialysis fluid outlet, and a dialysis fluid flow rate of 500 mL/min at the dialysis fluid inlet. Water was used as the dialysis fluid in the computational analysis. Results for dialysis fluid flow velocity of the modeled dialyzers indicate that taper design and a fully surrounded baffle are important in making the dialysis fluid flow into a hollow-fiber bundle easily and uniformly. However, dialysis fluid flow channeling occurred particularly at the outflowing part with dialyzers having larger taper lengths and angles. Optimum design of dialysis jacket structure is essential to optimizing dialysis fluid flow and to increasing dialyzer performance.