共查询到14条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
目的:探讨18F-FDG PET/CT显像代谢参数与非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)原发灶程序性细胞死亡配体1(programmed cell death-ligand 1,PD-L1)表达水平的关系。方法:回顾性分析56例经病理证实的非小细胞肺癌患者的临床病理资料及治疗前18F-FDG PET/CT影像,所有患者均使用免疫组化法检测PD-L1表达状态,分析18F-FDG PET/CT的代谢参数与原发灶PD-L1表达水平的相关性。结果:与PD-L1阴性患者比较,阳性患者原发灶SUVmax、MTV、TLG均较高(P<0.05)。通过Spearman相关性分析,PD-L1的表达与 SUVmax、MTV、TLG均有显著的相关性(r=0.537,P=0.000;r=0.413,P=0.002;r=0.457,P=0.000)。经多变量分析,SUVmax被确定为预测肿瘤PD-L1表达的唯一独立因素(OR:2.132,95%CI:1.694~2.578,P=0.006)。结论:非小细胞肺癌原发灶FDG摄取与PD-L1表达存在相关性,PD-L1阳性更易发生在高SUVmax、MTV和TLG患者中。 相似文献
2.
目的 探讨肺腺癌组织中程序性细胞死亡蛋白配体-1(PD-L1)的表达与肿瘤组织18F-脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)摄取的关系。方法 回顾性分析经病理证实的102例肺腺癌患者的临床资料,于治疗前行18F-FDG PET/CT检查,术后病理行免疫组织化学检测PD-L1表达情况,分析18F-FDG PET/CT最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)与PD-L1表达之间的关系。结果 102例患者中50例(49%)PD-L1阳性,阳性患者原发灶的SUVmax高于阴性患者(6.59±5.03 vs. 2.89±4.65, P=0.0001),用SUVmax预测PD-L1表达时,受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)下面积是0.801(P=0.0001);当SUVmax临界值为1.70时,约登指数最大为0.522。结论 肺腺癌原发灶FDG摄取与PD-L1表达存在相关性,PD-L1阳性更易发生在高SUVmax患者。 相似文献
3.
4.
目的 探讨18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)显像治疗前病灶最大标准摄取值(maximum standard uptake value, SUVmax)与乳腺浸润性导管癌临床病理特征的关系及与新辅助化疗疗效的相关性,以指导临床个体化治疗。方法 选取佛山市第一人民医院行18F-FDG PET/CT显像的272例初治乳腺浸润性导管癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,测定原发病灶的SUVmax,分析临床病理特征、分子分型及新辅助化疗疗效与原发灶SUVmax的相关性。结果 乳腺癌原发灶的SUVmax在不同T分期、不同组织学分级、有无淋巴结转移方面差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),雌激素受体(ER)和(或)孕激素受体(PR)阳性组与阴性组的SUVmax差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性组与阴性组的SUVmax差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),Ki-67高表达者SUVmax高于低表达者(P<0.05)。Basal-like型和HER2过表达型SUVmax均高于Luminal A型乳腺癌(P<0.05)。病理完全缓解组与未达到病理缓解组SUVmax差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax与乳腺癌的临床病理特征具有较大的相关性,原发病灶SUVmax较高者更能从新辅助化疗中获益。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
背景与目的:肺癌组织程序性死亡配体-1(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)表达水平不仅是程序性死亡[蛋白]-1(programmed death-1,PD-1)/PD-L1抑制剂最主要的疗效预测生物标志物,还可能影响表皮生长因子受体-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor,EGFR-TKI)的疗效。然而,肺癌组织PD-L1表达水平能否影响肺腺癌患者化疗效果,目前相关文献报道较少。探讨肺腺癌组织PD-L1表达对培美曲塞为基础的化疗效果的影响及其潜在机制。方法:2015年10月—2018年12月于中国人民解放军西部战区总医院肿瘤诊治中心确诊为肺腺癌且符合研究入组条件的患者共185例。应用免疫组织化学法分别检测肺腺癌组织中PD-L1和培美曲塞疗效预测分子胸苷酸合酶(thymidylate synthase,TS)的表达。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制患者的生存曲线,采用log-rank检验和COX回归模型分析影响患者无疾病进展生存(progression-free survival,PFS)的临床病理学因素,采用log-rank检验分别分析PD-L1和TS表达对患者PFS和总生存(overall survival,OS)的影响,采用Spearman秩相关性检验分析肺腺癌组织中PD-L1表达与TS表达的相关性。应用蛋白质印迹法(Western blot)及实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction,RTFQ-PCR)分别检测6种肺腺癌细胞系中PD-L1、TS的蛋白水平和mRNA表达。采用Pearson相关性检验分析PD-L1和TS在蛋白表达水平及mRNA表达水平的相关性。结果:在51例一线接受培美曲塞为基础化疗的晚期肺腺癌患者中,PD-L1表达阳性患者的客观有效率(objective response rate,ORR)和疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)与PD-L1表达阴性患者相比差异无统计学意义(ORR:20.0% vs 35.5%,χ 2 =1.404,P=0.236;DCR:60.0%vs 80.6%,χ 2 =2.602,P=0.107)。PD-L1表达阴性患者的中位无疾病进展生存(median progression-free survival,mPFS)显著优于PD-L1表达阳性患者(mPFS:5.6个月vs 4.1个月,log-rank=5.406,P=0.020),两组患者中位总生存(median overall survival,mOS)差异无统计学意义(mOS:15.9个月 vs 12.7个月,log-rank=0.525,P=0.469)。单因素分析发现PD-L1和TS表达阳性是影响患者PFS的危险因素(P=0.023和P=0.003),多因素分析发现TS表达阳性是影响患者PFS的独立危险因素(P=0.034)。在51例一线接受培美曲塞为基础化疗的晚期肺腺癌患者中,患者肺腺癌组织PD-L1表达与TS表达呈显著正相关性(r s =0.691,P<0.001);进一步扩大样本检测发现:在不同肿瘤分期和一线治疗模式的185例肺腺癌患者中,癌组织PD-L1表达与TS表达仍然呈显著正相关(r s =0.588,P<0.001)。在包括A549在内的6种肺腺癌细胞系中PD-L1与TS在蛋白水平和mRNA表达均呈显著正相关(蛋白水平:r s =0.899,P<0.05;mRNA表达:r s =0.861,P<0.05)。结论:在一线接受培美曲塞为基础化疗的晚期肺腺癌患者中,PD-L1表达阳性患者的mPFS较PD-L1表达阴性患者显著缩短,提示PD-L1表达可能作为晚期肺腺癌患者培美曲塞为基础化疗的潜在疗效预测生物标志物。PD-L1和TS的表达不论在肺腺癌组织水平还是细胞系水平均存在显著相关性,可能是PD-L1表达影响培美曲塞化疗效果的潜在原因之一。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
《Clinical lung cancer》2021,22(5):432-440
BackgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate if 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT)-derived parameters are useful in predicting response and survival after programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blocking immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC characterized by a high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50%) on immunohistochemistry.Patients and MethodsIn 30 patients with advanced stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high PD-L1 expression, 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters before start of treatment with PD-1 blocking immunotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. In 24 out of the 30 patients, 18F-FDG PET/CT was available 8 to 9 weeks after start of the treatment. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and metabolic responses assessed on 18F-FDG PET/CT were compared.ResultsMedian follow-up was 20 months (range, 4.2-37.6). Median PD-L1 expression was 80%. The objective response rate with RECIST 1.1 was 53.3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-37.8), and median overall survival (OS) was 14.9 months (95% CI, 2.4-38.2). Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters did not differ between responders and non-responders (all P > .05). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was the only 18F-FDG PET/CT parameter associated with PFS (P = .04), with a trend for OS (P = .06). At first evaluation, response according to total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were associated with PFS and OS (both P < .0001). This was not the case for RECIST 1.1 (P = .29 for PFS and P = .38 for OS).ConclusionClinical response and survival were independent from metabolic tumor volume at baseline. Reduction of metabolic tumor volume after 8 to 9 weeks of treatment was a better predictor for prolonged survival than RECIST 1.1. 相似文献