共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
张晓娟岳冬丽杨双宁郝娜王丽萍董文杰 《肿瘤防治研究》2023,(6):593-597
目的探讨卡瑞利珠单抗联合安罗替尼三线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析84例二线治疗进展后的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床资料。其中44例接受卡瑞利珠单抗联合安罗替尼治疗的患者为观察组,40例接受单药安罗替尼治疗的患者为对照组。比较两组无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和不良事件(AE)发生率。结果观察组的中位PFS长于对照组(7.0月vs.5.6月,P=0.001)。两组ORR及DCR差异无统计学意义(P=0.112,P=0.508)。两组AE及≥3级AE发生率差异均无统计学意义(P=0.222,P=0.112)。结论卡瑞利珠单抗联合安罗替尼三线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效优于单用安罗替尼,且安全性良好。 相似文献
2.
目的 比较贝伐珠单抗与阿帕替尼治疗复发性宫颈癌的疗效及安全性.方法 选取复发性宫颈癌患者46例,随机分为贝伐珠单抗组和阿帕替尼组,各23例.在紫杉醇+顺铂的化疗方案上,分别予以贝伐珠单抗和阿帕替尼治疗.对比2种方法的疗效和安全性.结果 贝伐珠单抗组与阿帕替尼组的总有效率(69.57%vs 82.61%)无显著差异(P>... 相似文献
3.
目的 探讨甲磺酸阿帕替尼联合卡瑞利珠单抗治疗Ⅲ/Ⅳ期胃癌的效果及对无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。方法 选取86例Ⅲ/Ⅳ期胃癌患者,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各43例,两组均进行放化疗,其中对照组同步采用甲磺酸阿帕替尼治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合卡瑞利珠单抗治疗,随访1年,观察两组近期疗效、氧化应激反应、PFS及不良反应。结果 治疗后观察组近期有效率高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗后两组GSH-PX、SOD均升高,MDA均下降,且观察组GSH-PX、SOD均高于对照组,MDA低于对照组(P<0.05);随访1年,观察组PFS、无进展生存率均高于对照组(P<0.05);两组发生肝功能损伤、胃肠道反应、骨髓抑制、蛋白尿等不良反应严重程度无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论 甲磺酸阿帕替尼联合卡瑞利珠单抗治疗Ⅲ/Ⅳ期胃癌较单独使用甲磺酸阿帕替尼能有效改善近期疗效,降低氧化应激反应,延长无进展生存时间,是一种安全有效的治疗方法。 相似文献
4.
目的 探讨以卡瑞利珠单抗为基础的联合治疗策略治疗晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的临床疗效。方法 将48例晚期/转移性食管鳞状细胞癌患者按治疗方法的不同分为对照组12例和观察组36例。对照组患者给予卡瑞利珠单抗治疗,观察组患者给予卡瑞利珠单抗联合化疗或靶向治疗,其中卡瑞利珠单抗联合化疗29例,卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿帕替尼治疗7例。比较两组患者的临床疗效、生存情况和不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组患者疾病控制率(DCR)为72.22%(26/36),高于对照组的33.33%(4/12),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者中位无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)均长于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者各不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 卡瑞利珠单抗联合化疗或靶向治疗能改善晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的PFS和OS,且耐受性较好。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
目的 观察呋喹替尼联合信迪利单抗治疗晚期微卫星稳定型结直肠癌的临床治疗效果及安全性。方法 收集44例晚期微卫星稳定型结直肠癌患者,根据治疗方法分为呋喹替尼单药组(n=22)和呋喹替尼联合信迪利单抗组(n=22)。治疗方案:呋喹替尼单药组口服呋喹替尼5 mg,每日1次,服用3周停药1周,每28天为1周期;呋喹替尼联合信迪利单抗组静脉滴注信迪利单抗200 mg,每3周1次、呋喹替尼方案同单药组,并分析临床效果及不良反应。结果 呋喹替尼单药组患者客观缓解率(ORR)为9.09%,疾病控制率(DCR)为45.45%;呋喹替尼联合信迪利单抗组患者ORR为18.18%, DCR为63.64%;呋喹替尼单药组中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为4.4(2.1, 8.2)个月,呋喹替尼联合信迪利单抗组患者中位PFS为6.7(3.9, 12.6)个月,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.372, P=0.037)。两组患者治疗过程中的不良反应多为1~2级,且差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 呋喹替尼联合信迪利单抗较呋喹替尼单药治疗可给经标准治疗失败后的晚期微卫星稳定型结直肠癌患者带来更好的临床获益,... 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
抗血管生成在恶性肿瘤治疗中的作用日益突出,其在转化、维持治疗过程中都发挥重要作用。我国自主研发的抗血管生成靶向药甲磺酸阿帕替尼(apatinib,YN968D1)已批准用于晚期胃腺癌或胃-食管结合部腺癌的三线及三线以上的治疗,并在多个实体肿瘤中探索应用。随着对阿帕替尼研究的深入,其安全性问题受到广泛关注。本文重点介绍了阿帕替尼在临床应用中常见的不良反应,综合分析了现有的临床数据,对比了阿帕替尼与其他常用抗血管生成药物不良反应的优劣,以期帮助临床医生更好地把握该药的安全性,从而为患者提供更加安全、有效的治疗。 相似文献
12.
13.
背景与目的:目前,甲磺酸阿帕替尼在中国仅被批准用于晚期胃癌三线治疗,而近年来研究表明,抗血管生成药物在多种晚期实体瘤中疗效显著。以中西医结合为主的综合治疗模式在抗肿瘤治疗中存在优势。该研究旨在观察中医药联合甲磺酸阿帕替尼干预二线治疗失败后Ⅳ期恶性肿瘤患者的短期临床疗效及安全性。方法:选择2016年1月—2017年7月上海中医药大学附属龙华医院肿瘤科收治的21例二线治疗失败后的晚期恶性肿瘤患者为研究对象,治疗方案为甲磺酸阿帕替尼500 mg,口服,每天1次,28 d为1个疗程(可根据患者不良反应分级进行剂量调整),同时联合中药静脉制剂+口服辨证中药汤剂治疗,评价短期临床疗效和安全性。结果:21例患者经中医辨证联合甲磺酸阿帕替尼靶向治疗1个疗程后,部分缓解(partial response,PR)6例,疾病稳定(stable disease,SD)15例,总有效率(overall response rate,ORR)为27.27%,疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)为95.45%;治疗后肿瘤标志物CEA、CA125、CYFRA211及神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase,NSE)明显下降,与治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),所有患者均未见4级不良反应。结论:对于二线治疗失败后的晚期恶性肿瘤患者,中医联合血管生成靶向药物甲磺酸阿帕替尼疗效明确,不良反应可耐受。本研究为进一步开展中医药联合甲磺酸阿帕替尼治疗的大样本、随机、对照研究提供了前期临床数据支持。 相似文献
14.
Yuhong Dai Li Sun Liang Zhuang Mingsheng Zhang Yanmei Zou Xianglin Yuan Hong Qiu 《Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.》2022,13(2):722
BackgroundAt present, regorafenib and fruquintinib are the standard regimens for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients in China, but both options have limited efficacy. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib plus S-1 compared with regorafenib and fruquintinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies.MethodsThe records of 114 patients with refractory mCRC in our center from April 2016 to September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 43 received apatinib 250 mg/day combined with S-1, 36 received regorafenib starting at 80 mg/day with weekly escalation, and 35 received fruquintinib 5 mg/day orally. Patients received radiographic examination every 1.5–2 months during the treatment period, progression-free survival time and overall survival time were analyzed and recorded.ResultsThe baseline clinical characteristics of the patients were broadly similar among the three groups. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–5.3] in the apatinib plus S-1 group, 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.9–4.2) in the fruquintinib group, and 2.4 months (95% CI: 2.1–2.7) in the regorafenib group, the mPFS of apatinib plus S-1 was significantly longer than that of regorafenib (HR =0.49, P=0.003) and fruquintinib (HR =0.60, P=0.048). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% CI: 5.4–11.0) in the apatinib plus S-1 group, 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.3–10.3) in the fruquintinib group, and 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.2–10.7) in the regorafenib group, which was comparable among the 3 groups. There was no statistical difference in disease control rate (DCR) among the three groups. Patients in the apatinib plus S-1 group had a higher incidence of hematological toxicity including anemia (62.8%), neutropenia (30.2%), and thrombocytopenia (39.5%), and the hand-foot skin reaction (58.3%) was more prevalent in the regorafenib group, while the adverse reaction of hypertension (45.7%) in the fruquintinib group was very significant.ConclusionsLow-dose apatinib plus S-1 prolonged PFS compared with regorafenib and fruquintinib, and is a potential alternative regimen for the treatment of refractory mCRC with tolerable and controlled toxicity. 相似文献
15.
BackgroundTrastuzumab plus chemotherapy is the standard-of-care (SoC) first-line therapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Combining PD-1 antibody with SoC first-line therapy showed encouraging results in the KEYNOTE-811 study. The retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SoC vs. SoC plus camrelizumab (PD-1 antibody) as a first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer in a real-world setting.MethodsThis study included 41 patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer who received SoC or SoC plus camrelizumab from June 2017 to December 2020. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsThirteen patients received SoC (SoC group) and 28 patients received SoC plus camrelizumab (camrelizumab group). As of December 2020, the median follow-up time was 10.0 months. In the camrelizumab and SoC groups, the ORRs were 75.0% and 46.2% (P=0.032), respectively. The DCR was 96.4% in the camrelizumab group and 69.2% in the SoC group (P=0.003). The median OS was 18.4 in the camrelizumab group and 13.2 months in the SoC group [hazard ratio (HR) =0.343; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.151–0.783; P=0.008]. The median PFS was 3.78 in the camrelizumab group and 1.74 months in the SoC group (HR =0.416; 95% CI: 0.186–0.932; P=0.027). In the HER2 subgroups in the camrelizumab group, the median PFS of immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ vs. IHC 2+ fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was 11.3 vs. 9.0 months (HR =1.684; 95% CI: 0.710–3.994; P=0.047). The incidence rates of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (P<0.001), abnormal liver function (P=0.040), and hypothyroidism (P=0.039) between the two groups were significantly different. RCCEP and hypothyroidism were considered to be related to camrelizumab.ConclusionsFirst-line treatment with camrelizumab combined with SoC showed significant clinical benefits and good tolerance compared with SoC for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. 相似文献
16.
Apatinib is an oral TKI with antiangiogenic properties, and it is currently approved for the treatment of advanced
gastric cancer in China. This agent has also been tested in other human solid tumors, including non-small cell
lung cancer (NSCLC). Since the combination of chemotherapy and an antiangiogenic agent has been shown
to be a feasible strategy in NSCLC, it is conceivable that a similar approach combining apatinib with chemotherapy may yield clinical activity. With this in mind, we investigated the efficiency of apatinib in combination
with pemetrexed or docetaxel in advanced NSCLC. We treated a total of 20 patients with metastatic NSCLC
adenocarcinoma with apatinib in combination with either pemetrexed or docetaxel from January 2016 to March
2017. The performance status of these patients was 0 or 1. All of these patients had been previously treated
with two or more lines of treatment and had experienced disease progression prior to study enrollment. The
overall objective response rate (ORR) was 30%, with 6 patients who had partial response (PR), 10 patients who
had stable disease (SD), and 4 patients who had progressive disease (PD). The main adverse events were skin
rash, hypertension, palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, and fatigue. Nearly 30% of patients
required interruption of treatment as a result of toxicity. Our study demonstrated that apatinib combined with
systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy has clinical efficacy in patients with disease-refractory metastatic NSCLC
and provides evidence for further studies investigating apatinib-based combination regimens. 相似文献
17.
血管生成在细胞生长的过程中具有重要作用,同时也是肿瘤发生的基础。因此,抑制肿瘤血管生成是抗肿瘤的有效途径。阿帕替尼是一种新型小分子抗血管生成抑制剂,通过特异性抑制血管内皮细胞生成因子-2(VEGFR-2)的酪氨酸激酶活性,从而达到抑制肿瘤血管生成,发挥抗肿瘤作用。阿帕替尼最初在胃癌治疗中取得成效,随后在乳腺癌、肺癌、肝癌以及软组织等肿瘤中亦发现了其应用前景。本文将阿帕替尼在多种实体肿瘤中的相关临床试验进行综述,使读者更加全面地认识阿帕替尼,为临床实践提供参考,并期望为恶性肿瘤患者的治疗带来一些新的选择。 相似文献
18.
随着抗血管生成靶向治疗的发展,作用于血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF)及其血管内皮生长因子受体(vascular endothelial growth factor receptor ,VEGFR)信号通路的抗肿瘤药物越来越受到广泛的关注。血管内皮细胞生长因子受体- 2(vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2,VEGFR- 2)抑制剂阿帕替尼是一种高效抗血管生成药物,是最新上市的口服分子靶向抗肿瘤药物之一。阿帕替尼在人体生物利用度高,安全性及耐受性良好。上市前后一系列大规模的随机、对照临床试验证实阿帕替尼在多种恶性肿瘤中具有一定的客观有效率和生存获益,如胃癌、非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer ,NSCLC )、乳腺癌等,尤其是在胃癌中。2014年该药在中国批准上市应用于临床治疗晚期胃癌。目前正在进行胃癌、肺癌、肝癌、食管癌、结直肠癌等多种恶性肿瘤的Ⅱ/ Ⅲ期临床试验,以探讨其单独或联合抗肿瘤活性。本文就阿帕替尼抗肿瘤机制、对不同类型肿瘤的临床疗效、安全性及不良反应、药物相互作用、耐药及生物标志物等最新研究进展进行综述,以加深对该药抗肿瘤应用的了解,为临床实践提供参考,并期望为恶性肿瘤患者的治疗带来一些新的选择。 相似文献
19.
目的 探讨阿帕替尼联合替莫唑胺治疗晚期黑色素瘤的安全性及初步疗效。 方法 收集2016年12月至2017年5月常规治疗失败的晚期黑素瘤患者9例,分为3个剂量递增组(每组3例):替莫唑胺100 mg,阿帕替尼 250 mg;替莫唑胺 200 mg,阿帕替尼 250 mg;替莫唑胺 200 mg,阿帕替尼 500 mg。每28天重复。剂量递增采用传统3+3方法,应用RECIST 1.1标准评价疗效,不良事件按照NCI-CTCAE 4.0分级。主要研究终点为安全性(剂量限制性毒性和最大耐受剂量),次要终点为客观有效率。 结果 9例晚期黑素瘤患者,剂量递增完成,未观察到剂量限制性毒性,常见不良反应包括高血压(33.3%)、手足皮肤反应(33.3%)、蛋白尿(22.2%)、白细胞减少(22.2%)、恶心(22.2%)、乏力(11.1%)等,均为1~2级,最大耐受剂量目前未达到。截至2017年5月,7例患者可评价疗效,1例部分缓解(PR),4例稳定(SD),2例进展(PD),客观反应率为14.3%。 结论 阿帕替尼联合替莫唑胺治疗晚期黑色素瘤未观察到剂量限制性毒性,可观察到初步疗效。 相似文献
20.
阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
背景与目的 晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的二线、三线化疗有效率较低,靶向药物的应用为部分患者带来生存获益.阿帕替尼是一种新型小分子抗血管生成药物,在多种恶性肿瘤治疗中展现出令人满意的抗癌活性.本研究旨在评价阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞NSCLC的安全性和疗效.方法 回顾性分析128例晚期非鳞NSCLC不同治疗组患者的疗效和生存情况,用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox模型进行分析.结果 以单纯化疗组为对照,阿帕替尼单药组、单纯化疗组和阿帕替尼联合化疗组的中位无进展生存期(progression free survival,PFS)分别为3.0个月(P=0.381)、3.7个月和6.0个月(P<0.001),中位总生存期(overall survival,OS)分别为6.0个月(P=0.494)、6.5个月和9.0个月(P=0.001).3级-4级不良反应发生率分别为18.5%、15.8%和16.0%(P=0.947).治疗方案(P=0.018)及体能状态(performance status,PS)(P<0.001)是PFS的独立影响因素,吸烟史(P=0.014)、治疗方案(P=0.002)和PS(P<0.001)是OS的独立影响因素.结论 阿帕替尼安全性高,肺癌一线治疗失败后,二线或三线化疗联合阿帕替尼,与单纯化疗相比,患者有PFS和OS获益,阿帕替尼单药与单纯化疗组间PFS和OS无明显差异;无吸烟史、PS 0分-1分和联合治疗的患者预后更好. 相似文献