Citalopram 20 mg, 40 mg and 60 mg are all effective and well tolerated compared with placebo in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear to be uniquely effective treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This double-blind, placebo-controlled study was the first trial to assess the efficacy of the most selective of the serotonin reuptake inhibitors, citalopram, in OCD. A total of 401 patients were randomized to receive citalopram 20, 40 or 60 mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks. All three doses of citalopram were significantly more effective than placebo measured on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) change score (P < 0.01). The highest response rate, defined as 25% improvement in Y-BOCS entry score, was observed in the 60 mg group (65%). This compared with 52% and 57.4% in the 40 mg and 20 mg groups. Response rate on placebo was 36.6% (P < 0.05 for all three doses of citalopram compared to placebo). There was no significant difference between the individual doses of citalopram. An advantage was seen for citalopram on the Sheehan Disability Scale compared with placebo (P < 0.05 on all three citalopram groups versus placebo for both the work situation and the family life and home responsibilities and P < 0.05 on citalopram 60 mg and 20 mg versus placebo for the social life and home activities). Citalopram was well tolerated; only 4 to 6 patients in each dose group discontinued the study prematurely due to adverse events.     

A score for predicting response to pharmacotherapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Although there have been many attempts to find predictors of therapeutic response to antidepressant treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), few reports have evaluated the joint predictive value of a number of clinical characteristics. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors of outcome in OCD, and to develop an easily applicable method to predict response to drug treatment. One hundred and fifty patients with primary OCD according to DSM-IV criteria were randomly assigned in a 12-week, double-blind, comparison trial with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (paroxetine), and a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (venlafaxine). The primary efficacy parameter was the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) score, and response to treatment was prospectively defined as a >/= 35% decrease from the beginning. A stepwise multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors. The absence of previous therapies, moderate baseline severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Y-BOCS score < 23), and low Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale scores (6-15) were found to be prognostic determinants of good response to pharmacotherapy. The prognostic ability of the prediction model to discriminate between responders and non-responders was quantified as the area under the receiver operating/operator characteristic curve (ROC area), which was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.8), demonstrating a reasonable discriminatory power. This study is the first to present a model that can estimate by the use of prediction rules the probability of treatment response to antidepressants in patients with OCD.     

Aripiprazole augmentation in 39 adolescents with medication-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder

The aim of this study was to assess efficacy of aripiprazole augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) treatment in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who did not respond to 2 initial trials with SRI monotherapy. A consecutive series of 39 adolescents (28 males and 11 females; age range, 12 to 18 years; mean age, 14.6 ± 1.2 years), with OCD diagnosed based on a clinical interview and according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria, were included. The mean final aripiprazole dosage was 12.2 ± 3.4 mg/d. At the endpoint, 27 patients (59.0%) had a Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement score 1 or 2 (very much or much improved) and a Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score 3 or below and were thus considered responders. The CGI-S improved from 6.0 ± 0.9 at the baseline (severely to extremely severely ill) to 3.5 ± 1.0 (mild to moderately ill) at the end of the follow-up (P < 0.0001), whereas the Children's Global Assessment Scale improved from 39.2 ± 5.8 to 49.8 ± 9.0 (P < 0.0001). Compared with nonresponders, responders were less impaired at the baseline in functional impairment (Children's Global Assessment Scale; P = 0.004) but not in clinical severity (CGI-S). Subtypes of OCD comorbidity and absence of insight did not affect clinical response. Mild transitory agitation (10.3%), mild sedation (10.3%), and sleep disorders (7.7%) were reported, but any of the patients discontinued medication because of adverse effects.In these severely impaired adolescents, aripiprazole augmentation of SRIs was well tolerated and effective in more than half of the patients.     

Quetiapine and ziprasidone as adjuncts in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are first-line pharmacological agents in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), 40-60% of patients with the disorder do not respond to these agents. This suggests that other neurotransmitters may play a role in OCD. In this regard, there has been particular interest in the dopaminergic system, with various antipsychotic drugs having been used as adjunctive therapy for refractory OCD. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of quetiapine and ziprasidone as adjuncts for treatment-resistant OCD. METHODS: A total of 24 OCD patients treated with either quetiapine (n = 15) or ziprasidone (n = 9) as adjunctive therapy to high-dose SRI treatment were included in this retrospective evaluation. Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale scores were used to evaluate baseline clinical status and clinical improvement at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Clinical improvement was established in 80% of the quetiapine group and in 44.4% of the ziprasidone group with an overall mean improvement rate on the Y-BOCS scale of 66.7%. Both Y-BOCS and CGI mean scores were higher in the ziprasidone group at 2, 3 and 6 months follow-up than in the quetiapine group. CONCLUSIONS: In the first reported study of its role in this setting, ziprasidone was found to be less effective than quetiapine in the treatment of refractory OCD.     

Results of a double-blind placebo controlled trial of a new serotonin uptake inhibitor, sertraline, in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Eighty-seven patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) without depression were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of sertraline, a new serotonin uptake inhibitor. After a 1-week washout period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or sertraline. After a 2-week titration period in which the once-daily sertraline dose was increased from 50 mg/day to a maximum of 200 mg/day, dosage was maintained until the end of the eighth week, then patients were titrated off medication over the next 2 weeks. Efficacy was measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), NIMH General Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive (MOC) Inventory, and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity and Improvement scales. Results on the MOC Inventory showed trends in favor of active drug that were not statistically significant compared with placebo. Results of the Y-BOCS total score, the NIMH score, and the global severity and improvement scores demonstrated a statistically significant superiority of sertraline compared with placebo.     

Side effects as predictors of drug response in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Differences between the side effect profiles of clomipramine (CMI) and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be important factors in both treatment outcome and patient selection in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Safety and efficacy data from an industry-sponsored, multicenter clinical trial of CMI were analyzed previously using tabular and multiple regression methods. Good response, defined as at least a 35% drop in final scores on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), was associated with a later age of OCD onset and certain early side effects that may reflect a sensitivity of responders to CMI's serotonergic actions. The authors conducted a similar analysis of data from an industry-sponsored clinical trial of fluoxetine in OCD. Fluoxetine response did not seem to be associated with age of OCD onset. Good response to both drugs was associated with initial nervousness and sexual complaints. The common side effects of fluoxetine (headache, nausea, and gastrointestinal complaints) did not seem to be associated with treatment response. Slight differences in the protocols of the two clinical trials yielded patient populations that were different in factors found to be associated with treatment outcome: subjects in the fluoxetine study had lower scores on the Y-BOCS, higher scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and an earlier age of OCD onset.     

High-dose escitalopram for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose escitalopram in patients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In an open-label, 16-week prospective study, patients with OCD received escitalopram at a dose of 20 mg/day for 3 weeks, after a 1-week titration at 10 mg/day. Patients who did not achieve a > or =25% reduction from baseline in the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score during these 4 weeks were continued on higher doses of escitalopram (maximum 50 mg/day) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy measure of OCD symptoms was change from baseline in the Y-BOCS score. Overall, 67 patients (33 women, 34 men) with a mean Y-BOCS score of 29.6 entered the study. After 4 weeks of standard-dose escitalopram treatment, one patient discontinued owing to pregnancy, and two patients achieved a reduction in Y-BOCS > or =25%. Consequently, 64 patients were eligible to receive high-dose escitalopram (mean dose, 33.8 mg/day at endpoint). At endpoint, high-dose escitalopram had significantly improved the OCD symptoms (Y-BOCS score) and all the other efficacy measures (P<0.001), compared with baseline. Escitalopram was also well tolerated, with no discontinuations during the 12-week high-dose phase. The only reported adverse drug reactions were dry mouth (n=8, 12.1%) and decreased sexual desire (n=21, 31.8%). Preliminary investigation shows that high-dose escitalopram is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for patients suffering from severe OCD. Randomized, blinded studies are needed to reinforce these findings.     

Risperidone augmentation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of 8 wk of risperidone augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) treatment in adult subjects with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (failure of at least two SRI trials). Sixteen adult treatment-resistant OCD patients were randomly assigned to augmentation with 8 wk of either risperidone (n=10) (0.5-3.0 mg/d) or placebo (n=6) following at least 12 wk of SRI treatment. Four patients on risperidone (40%) and none (0%) on placebo were responders with both a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 or 2 and a Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) decrease >/=25%. Risperidone was generally well tolerated: there were 3 dropouts, 1 on risperidone and 2 on placebo. Better Y-BOCS insight score at baseline significantly correlated with a greater CGI-I score at endpoint on risperidone augmentation. Risperidone may be an effective and well-tolerated augmentation strategy in treatment-resistant OCD subjects, but larger sample size studies are required to demonstrate this.     

Granisetron adjunct to fluvoxamine for moderate to severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background: Several small studies have shown beneficial effects of ondansetron, a serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The efficacy of other 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists in patients with OCD is still unclear. Granisetron does not alter cytochrome P450 activity and might have a lower risk of drug interactions, a longer duration of action and a better tolerability profile than other 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of granisetron augmentation of fluvoxamine in patients with OCD. Study Design: This was a two-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study conducted from November 2011 to March 2012. Study Setting: The study setting was outpatient clinics of two large referral centres. Patients: Study participants were men and women, aged 18-60 years, who met the diagnostic criteria of OCD based on the DSM-IV-TR and who had a Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score of at least 21. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to granisetron (Kytril?; SmithKline Beecham, Philadelphia, PA, USA) 1?mg every 12 hours or placebo every 12 hours in addition to fluvoxamine for 8 weeks. Main Outcome Measure: Patients were assessed using the Y-BOCS at baseline, second, fourth, sixth and eighth weeks. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the score change of Y-BOCS total score from baseline to week 8 between the two groups. We also compared changes in the obsession and compulsion subscales of the Y-BOCS, and frequencies of partial response (≥25% reduction in Y-BOCS score), complete response (≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS score) and remission (Y-BOCS score ≤16) between the two groups. Results: Of the 42 included patients, 39 (20 in the placebo group, 19 in the granisetron group) completed the study. Significant time X treatment interaction was observed for total Y-BOCS (F [2.097, 79.678]?=?4.941, p?=?0.009), obsession (F [2.337, 88.799]?=?4.938, p?=?0.006) and compulsion (F [2.050, 77.899]?=?4.674, p?=?0.012) subscales. By week 8, complete response and remission were achieved by 20 (100%) and 18 (90%) patients in the granisetron group and by 7 (35%) patients in the placebo group (p-value of Fisher's exact test <0.001, risk ratio (RR) [95% CI]?=?3.857 [2.039, 7.297]). There was no significant difference in the tolerability between the two regimens. Conclusion: Granisetron is an efficacious adjunct for the short-term treatment of patients with moderate to severe OCD and is well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration Number: IRCT201202041556N32.     

Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography and treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder

We investigated whether findings from pretreatment low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) predicted response to drug treatment in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The 3D intra-cerebral distribution of neuronal electrical activity from the scalp-recorded potential distribution of 17 drug-free patients with OCD was assessed with LORETA. They were treated with antidepressants in the maximum tolerated doses for at least 12 wk. Individuals were considered to be treatment responders if they displayed a reduction of at least 35% on the initial YBOCS scores and had a final CGI score of 1 or 2. The SPM-99 t test for independent samples was employed to compare, voxel-by-voxel, the brain electrical activities of responders (n = 10) and non-responders (n = 7). Responders exhibited significantly lower activities in beta band in the rostral anterior cingulate [Brodmann's area (BA) 24 and 32] (p = 0.002) and the medial frontal gyrus (BA 10) (p = 0.002), suggesting that a distinctive pattern of activity within the medial surface of the frontal lobe predicts therapeutic response in OCD.     

Parental obsessive-compulsive disorder as a prognostic factor in a year long fluvoxamine treatment in childhood and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder

Interest in the treatment of pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has increased as our knowledge of adult OCD has expanded. Although adults are still the majority of patients, children and adolescents with OCD are being identified and treated more frequently. As this population is better identified, prognostic factors need to be addressed to improve treatment outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of family psychiatric pathology in fluvoxamine treatment outcome. Eleven children and adolescents with OCD and one of their parents participated in the study. Four parents were diagnosed with OCD, six had an Axis I diagnosis other than OCD, and one had no mental disorder [Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-Non-Patient edition (SCID-NP)]. Each patient received fluvoxamine for 58 weeks. Dependent measures included the Children Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), the NIMH-Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale (NIMH-GOCS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Based on CY-BOCS, CGI and NIMH-GOCS scores, patients with parents who have OCD showed a clinically and statistically significant reduction in symptoms from pre- to post-treatment. Patients whose parents did not have OCD also improved. However, the improvement was statistically but not clinically significant. The presence of OCD in one parent seems to modify a child's response to medication. The results suggest that family psychopathology, specifically presence of OCD, may contribute to treatment efficacy. Further research is suggested in this area.     

Clinical predictors of treatment response in obsessive compulsive disorder: exploratory analyses from multicenter trials of clomipramine

Two multicenter, double-blind trials were conducted in adults with DSM-III (American Psychiatric Association 1980) defined Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), comparing clomipramine (Anafranil, CMI) up to 300 mg daily with placebo. Of 519 patients evaluated, 260 received CMI for up to 10 weeks. More than half of the CMI treated patients were significantly improved, approximately 30 percent were minimally improved, and 15 percent showed no improvement after CMI treatment. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) was used to assess treatment effects and attempts were made to correlate change in Y-BOCS score from baseline with a number of baseline characteristics, including age, sex, duration of OCD, baseline Y-BOCS score, baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score, presence or absence of secondary depression, and predominance of obsessions or compulsions. Pearson and/or Spearman correlations failed to reveal any statistically significant correlations between outcome and any of the baseline characteristics studied. While the differences were not statistically significant, it did appear that male patients and patients with a longer duration of illness may be less likely to respond to CMI treatment; however, the overall conclusion from this analysis is that none of the variables studied is a reliable predictor of responses to treatment with CMI.     

Predictors of response to pharmacotherapy with citalopram in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Although serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are the medications of choice in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), only 50-60% of patients respond to a single trial of any of these agents. Improved knowledge of the predictors of response to treatment may have important clinical implications. Data from a large randomized placebo-controlled trial of citalopram in OCD was analysed using logistic regression to determine predictors of response. Demographic (age, sex), clinical (OCD severity and duration, depression severity, prior treatment) and trial variables (citalopram dose, treatment duration) were included. Subjects with longer duration of OCD, more severe OCD symptoms or previous selective SRI use were less likely to be responders in the citalopram trial. In contrast, subjects who received adequate medication doses for sufficient periods of time in the citalopram trial were more likely to be responders. Despite greater awareness of OCD in recent years, there is evidence that the disorder continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. The data here emphasize the crucial importance of early diagnosis and treatment of OCD, and of pharmacotherapy with appropriate dose and duration.     

Onset of clinical effects and plasma concentration of fluvoxamine in Japanese patients

It is widely accepted that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) require 2 to 4 weeks of administration before improvements in emotional symptoms of depression are seen. We evaluated whether early monitoring of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores in patients treated with the SSRI fluvoxamine could predict antidepressant response, and also assessed the relationship between the onset of clinical response following the start of fluvoxamine administration and its plasma concentration. Twelve depressed patients (baseline HAMD score ≥15) received an initial dose of fluvoxamine (50 mg/d) followed by an optimized maintenance dose according to their clinical symptoms after 7 d. HAMD scores and plasma drug concentrations were determined at 7 and 28 d after the first administration. There were 7 responders and 5 non-responders on day 28, as evaluated by HAMD scores. The HAMD score for the responders was significantly lower than that for the non-responders on day 7 (mean±S.D., 11.6±6.1 vs. 26.6±6.5, p=0.006). Thus, the reduction in HAMD score on day 7 was clearly divided between responders and non-responders. On day 28, the plasma concentration of fluvoxamine in responders was lower than that in non-responders (14.2±10.5 ng/ml vs. 44.2±28.1 ng/ml, p=0.051). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis conducted on day 28 revealed an upper concentration threshold of 28.2 ng/ml (p=0.042), with none in the responder group above that level. Our results suggest that HAMD score after the first week of treatment with fluvoxamine and the upper threshold of plasma drug concentration could predict whether a patient is a non-responder.     

Citalopram in the treatment of dysthymic disorder

This study aimed to provide preliminary data on the tolerability and effectiveness of citalopram for patients with dysthymic disorder. Twenty-one adult subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for dysthymic disorder were enrolled in this 12-week open-label study, of whom 15 had pure dysthymia (e.g. no major depression in the past 2 years). Citalopram was initiated at 20 mg/day, and increased to a maximum of 60 mg/day. Response was defined as 50% or greater drop in score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and a Clinical Global Impressions-I score of 1 ('very much improved') or 2 ('much improved'). Of these 15 pure dysthymic disorder subjects, all completed the trial, and 11 (73.3%) were treatment responders. All paired sample t-tests were highly significant, demonstrating significant average improvement on all measures of symptomatology and functioning. Scores on the 24-item HDRS decreased from 22.3+/-4.3 at baseline to 9.1+/-7.8 at week 12 [t(14)=6.1, P<0.001]. In addition, improvement was noted in self-reported measures of temperament and social functioning. The average final dose of citalopram was 39 mg/day. Side-effects were reported by nine of 15 subjects (60%), most frequently gastrointestinal symptoms (n=5), dry mouth (n=5) and sexual side-effects (n=3). These findings suggest the effectiveness and tolerability of citalopram in treating dysthymic disorder. Double-blind prospective studies are needed comparing citalopram both to placebo and to other medications, assessing both initial and sustained response to treatment.     

Plasma clomipramine levels in adult patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

The aim of this study was to explore the possible relationship between plasma clomipramine and its major metabolite (N-desmethylclomipramine) levels and related parameters, and clinical features in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Twenty-six outpatients (13 men, 13 women), suffering from OCD were consecutively enrolled in this study. The severity of OCD was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). The measurements were taken after 4 weeks and 6 months from the beginning of the treatment. The drug levels were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography method developed by us. The correlations between biological and clinical parameters were analyzed by means of Spearman's correlation coefficient. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparing biological and clinical variables between men and women. The results showed that clomipramine levels were related to the doses at the two assessment times. A significant and positive correlation was detected at the beginning between the N-desmethylclomipramine ratio and the Y-BOCS total score; however, this was true only for men, where the similar correlations were measured also with the Y-BOCS subscale. After 6 months of clomipramine, men showed a significant improvement of the compulsions. These findings would highlight the potential impact of assessing clomipramine plasma levels and their relationships with specific symptoms, as well as the influence of the sex on the drug response.     

Can a subgroup of OCD patients with motor abnormalities and poor therapeutic response be identified?

Rationale In a subgroup of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), motor soft signs, tics and other movement disorders can be observed, indicating a special pathogenetic involvement of basal ganglia.Objectives The main objective of this study was to verify the hypothesis that such motor dysfunction characterises a subgroup of OCD patients with poor treatment response. For assessing even subtle motor dysfunction, a new method for kinematical analysis of hand movements has been applied.Methods We examined the performance of 45 in-patients who met the DSM-IV criteria for OCD before and under therapy (sertraline and behaviour therapy) using a digitising tablet and kinematical analysis of simple handwriting and drawing movements. All subjects wrote a sentence, their signature and letter sequences. Moreover, they drew circles under different conditions. Three kinematical parameters (stroke duration, variation coefficient of peak velocity, stroke length) were calculated to quantify hand-motor performance.Results Prior to therapy, non-responders wrote with significantly smaller amplitudes than responders. Additionally, non-responders drew significantly larger circles with the non-dominant hand at baseline, as compared to responders. Disturbances of handwriting were more frequent in non-responders than in responders.Conclusions Kinematical analysis of handwriting movements seems to be interesting for the prediction of poor response to treatments in OCD patients.     

Effectiveness and acceptability of sertraline and citalopram in major depressive disorder: pragmatic randomized open-label comparison

OBJECTIVE: Citalopram and sertraline are widely prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). There is no conclusive evidence to show superiority of citalopram or sertraline in terms of efficacy or tolerability. Hence this study was designed to compare short term efficacy and safety of citalopram and sertraline in major depressive disorder (MDD) in Indian patients. METHODS: In an open, randomized study, 100 patients were divided into two groups. In Group A (n = 50) patients received citalopram (20-60 mg/day) for 6 weeks. In Group B (n = 50) patients received sertraline (50-150 mg/day) for 6 weeks. Patients were evaluated at baseline and then at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 weeks. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS), Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and Amritsar depressive inventory (ADI) scores (p < 0.05) with both the drugs. However, the decrease in score was more with citalopram (p < 0.05). Onset of action of citalopram was earlier as compared to sertraline (p < 0.05). The number of responders and remitters was also more with citalopram (p < 0.05). No serious adverse event was reported in either of the groups. CONCLUSION: Citalopram had shown better efficacy, earlier onset of action and more number of responders and remitters as compared to sertraline in MDD in Indian patients.     

Quetiapine augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) with atypical antipsychotics for the management of treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is gaining increasing acceptance. Quetiapine is a novel antipsychotic which is well tolerated, and which may therefore be particularly useful in this context. Charts of all patients treated in our OCD clinic with the combination of an SRI and quetiapine were reviewed. Demographic details and clinical symptoms on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) were tabulated before and after augmentation. Eight OCD patients who had proven resistance to treatment with SRIs had received quetiapine augmentation. Four of these eight patients were responders (CGI of 1 or 2) within 4 weeks. In the treatment-responders, the medication was well tolerated. Although limited by the retrospective design and lack of controls, these data are consistent with the growing literature suggesting that approximately one-half of OCD patients resistant to treatment with SRIs may respond to augmentation with an atypical antipsychotic. Quetiapine, a relatively well tolerated agent, deserves further controlled study in this context.     

立体定向手术联合认知疗法对强迫症的疗效观察

目的研究立体定向毁损术联合认知疗法治疗强迫症（OCD）的疗效及安全性。方法对32例强迫症患者行立体定向双侧内囊前肢、尾状核下束毁损术,术后1个月后对患者进行为期半年的心理治疗,分别在术前2d与术后1、2、6个月进行临床疗效总评量表（CGI）、Yale-Brown强迫量表（Y-BOCS）、汉密顿抑郁量表（HAMD）及汉密顿焦虑量表（HAMA）对疗效进行评定,采用韦氏记忆量表（WMS）及韦氏成人智力量表（WAIS）评估手术的安全性。结果术后1、2、6个月与术前相比,CGI、Y-BOCS、HAMD、HAMA评分差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05或P〈0．01）,WMS及WAIS评分差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）,且无严重并发症和后遗症。结论立体定向手术联合认知疗法可以有效缓解患者的强迫症状．提高药物敏感性．明显改善患者的生存质量。