Postoperative epidural morphine analgesia in Papua New Guinea

In order to introduce the technique of epidural narcotics for pain relief in Papua New Guinea, fifty patients were given low doses of epidural morphine and thereupon the quality of analgesia and morbidity evaluated. The lowest effective epidural morphine dose was determined by considering the patient's characteristics and height of surgical incision. Pain relief was provided for three postoperative days in the surgical or gynaecological wards. The quality of analgesia thus provided was excellent in all the patients with no incidence of clinically significant respiratory depression or hypotension. Minor complications such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus and retention of urine were also relatively uncommon.     

Continuous epidural infusion of morphine for treatment of pain after thoracic surgery: a new technique

We evaluated postoperative pain relief and the incidence of side effects of three methods of thoracic epidural analgesia. Ninety patients, divided into three equal groups, received postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery either as intermittent epidural injections of bupivacaine (25 mg/5 ml, 0.5% solution) as needed, or, intermittent epidural injections of morphine (5 mg/5 ml of normal saline, 0.1% solution) as needed, or continuous epidural infusion of morphine (0.1 mg, in 1 ml of normal saline) per hour supplemented with intravenous morphine (2 mg) upon request. Pain relief was evaluated by each patient on a pain scale visual analogue and by pain relief questionnaire for a period of 72 hr. Postoperative pain relief was achieved equally with these three methods of epidural analgesia in all patients with no significant difference between groups. Intermittent epidural injection of bupivacaine relieved pain for 4.9 +/- 1.9 (SD) hr/injection and was associated with urinary retention in all patients, with numbness and weakness of the hands in 12 patients, and with severe hypotension in 7 patients. Intermittent epidural injection of morphine relieved pain for 5.8 +/- 2.3 hr/injection and was associated with urinary retention in all patients, with pruritus in 12 patients, and with central narcosis and respiratory depression in 8 patients. Continuous epidural infusion of morphine with occasional intravenous morphine (2 mg) supplementation also effectively relieved postoperative pain and was associated with minimal systemic side effects. One patient complained of pruritus, and two patients developed urinary retention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Randomized, double-blind study comparing postoperative effects of treatment timing with histamine H-receptor antagonist cimetidine

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of timing of preoperative, postoperative, and placebo administration of the H(2)-antagonist cimetidine on postoperative pain management and the incidence of side-effects. METHODS: One hundred and twenty ASA I to II patients, undergoing major gynaecological abdominal surgery, were randomly divided into three groups, and received a standardized general anaesthesia. The patients in the preoperative ('Pre') group received an intravenous infusion of cimetidine 4 mg kg(-1) prior to anaesthesia induction; the postoperative ('Post') group received the same volume of normal saline. Postoperatively, the patients in the Post group received an intravenous infusion of cimetidine 4 mg kg(-1); the patients in the Pre group received the same volume of normal saline. The Control group received the same volume of normal saline prior to anaesthesia induction and after the end of operation. Postoperatively, all patients were treated with a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia system, which was programmed to deliver 1 mg of morphine on demand for three consecutive days. RESULTS: Pain intensity, morphine consumption, sedation score, and side-effects were recorded and evaluated. We found no difference among the three groups with respect to pain intensities, morphine usage, sedation scores, and the incidence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, or dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that neither preoperative nor postoperative administration of cimetidine 4 mg kg(-1) provided a pre-emptive or preventive analgesic advantage for postoperative pain or morphine consumption, and that the use of cimetidine failed to reduce the incidence of nausea or vomiting.     

Thoracic epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial on length of hospital stay and patient-perceived quality of recovery

BACKGROUND: Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia reduces stress response and pain scores and may improve outcome after cardiac surgery. This prospective, randomized trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia with patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine on postoperative hospital length of stay and patients' perception of their quality of recovery after cardiac surgery. METHODS: One hundred thirteen patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to receive either combined thoracic epidural analgesia and general anesthesia followed by patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia or general anesthesia followed by to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. Postoperative length of stay, time to eligibility for hospital discharge, pain and sedation scores, degree of ambulation, lung volumes, and organ morbidities were evaluated. A validated quality of recovery score was used to measure postoperative health status. RESULTS: Length of stay and time to eligibility for hospital discharge were similar between the groups. Study groups differed neither in postoperative global quality of recovery score nor in five dimensions of quality of recovery score. Time to extubation was shorter (P < 0.001) and consumption of anesthetics was lower in the patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia group. Pain relief, degree of sedation, ambulation, and lung volumes were similar between the study groups. There was a trend for lower incidences of pneumonia (P = 0.085) and confusion (P = 0.10) in the patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia group, whereas cardiac, renal, and neurologic outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elective cardiac surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia followed by patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia offers no major advantage with respect to hospital length of stay, quality of recovery, or morbidity when compared with general anesthesia alone followed by to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine.     

Pain relief after esophagectomy: Thoracic epidural analgesia is better than parenteral opioids.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative pain relief and pulmonary function in patients after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy treated by continuing perioperative thoracic epidural anesthesia or changing to parenteral opioids. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three patients undergoing thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. INTERVENTIONS: General anesthesia was combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia during surgery. The patients either continued with thoracic epidural analgesia (n = 18) or were switched to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine (n = 15) for 5 postoperative days. Pain scores were estimated twice daily, at rest and after mobilization. Peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume, and vital capacity were measured the day before surgery, postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 6. Adverse events and complications were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At rest, there were no differences in pain relief between the groups. Pain scores at mobilization showed a significantly lower value in the epidural group (p < 0.027). No intergroup differences were found regarding pulmonary function, which decreased on postoperative day 2, but was improved on postoperative day 6. CONCLUSION: Continuation of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia for 5 postoperative days provides better pain relief at mobilization compared with a switch to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. There was no intergroup difference in the impact on measures of pulmonary function.     

Double epidural catheter with ropivacaine versus intravenous morphine: a comparison for postoperative analgesia after scoliosis correction surgery

BACKGROUND: Major spine surgery with a dorsal or ventrodorsal approach causes severe postoperative pain. The use of continuous epidural analgesia through one or two epidural catheters placed intraoperatively by the surgeon has been shown to provide efficient postoperative pain control. In this prospective unblinded study, the authors compared the efficacy of continuous intravenous morphine with a continuous double epidural catheter technique with ropivacaine after scoliosis correction. METHODS: Thirty patients with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III were prospectively randomized to either the morphine group or the epidural group. At the end of surgery, patients in the epidural group received two epidural catheters placed by the surgeon, one directed cephalad and one caudally. Correct placement was checked radiographically. Postoperative analgesia until the first postoperative morning was performed with remifentanil target-control infusion for all patients. From that time remifentanil was stopped and continuous intravenous analgesia with morphine or double epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.3% was initiated (T0 = beginning of study). Pain at rest and pain in motion (using a visual analog scale from 0-100), the amount of rescue analgesics, sensory level, motor blockade, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pruritus were assessed every 6 h and bowel function was assessed every 12 h until T72 (end of study). Two days later, patient satisfaction was assessed. RESULTS: Pain scores at rest were significantly decreased in the epidural group at all time points except at T12, T60, and T72. Pain scores in motion were significantly decreased in the epidural group at T24, T48, and T72. Bowel activity was significantly better in the epidural group at T24, T36, T48, and T60. Postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus occurred significantly less frequently in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods provide efficient postoperative analgesia. However, double epidural catheter technique provides better postoperative analgesia, earlier recovery of bowel function, fewer side effects, and a higher patient satisfaction.     

不同剂量比例的纳络酮与吗啡合用于手术后硬膜外镇痛的临床观察

目的探讨将吗啡与小剂量纳络酮按不同比例混合作患者硬膜外术后镇痛（CEA＋PCEA模式）效果。方法选择90例ASAⅠ～Ⅲ级行择期下腹部手术、术后硬膜外镇痛的患者,随机分为A、B、C三组,每组各30例（n=30）。三组的镇痛配方中布比卡因与吗啡用量相同,A、B两组中纳络酮／吗啡的比例分别为1／50与1／100．C组不加纳络酮;观察术后48h内各组患者的副作用、镇痛以及呼吸抑制等情况。结果（1）恶心呕吐：在术后3—36小时内,A组明显轻于C组（P〈0．05）。（2）瘙痒：在术后大部分时间内（6～36h）C组均重于A、B两组（P〈0．05）。（3）三组患者术后的疼痛程度大致相当（P〉0．05）,三组患者术后神志、下肢活动及呼吸情况均未见异常。结论剂量比例为1／50的纳洛酮与吗啡合用于患者硬膜外镇痛,有明显减少恶心呕吐、瘙痒等吗啡的副作用．同时不影响患者的镇痛效果以及神志、下肢活动与呼吸情况。     

Thoracic Epidural versus Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia after Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Length of Hospital Stay and Patient-perceived Quality of Recovery

Background: Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia reduces stress response and pain scores and may improve outcome after cardiac surgery. This prospective, randomized trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia with patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine on postoperative hospital length of stay and patients' perception of their quality of recovery after cardiac surgery.

Methods: One hundred thirteen patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to receive either combined thoracic epidural analgesia and general anesthesia followed by patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia or general anesthesia followed by to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. Postoperative length of stay, time to eligibility for hospital discharge, pain and sedation scores, degree of ambulation, lung volumes, and organ morbidities were evaluated. A validated quality of recovery score was used to measure postoperative health status.

Results: Length of stay and time to eligibility for hospital discharge were similar between the groups. Study groups differed neither in postoperative global quality of recovery score nor in five dimensions of quality of recovery score. Time to extubation was shorter (P < 0.001) and consumption of anesthetics was lower in the patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia group. Pain relief, degree of sedation, ambulation, and lung volumes were similar between the study groups. There was a trend for lower incidences of pneumonia (P = 0.085) and confusion (P = 0.10) in the patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia group, whereas cardiac, renal, and neurologic outcomes were similar between the groups.     

Postoperative epidural morphine is safe on surgical wards

The use of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia outside of intensive care units remains controversial. In this report our anesthesiology-based acute pain service documents experience with 1,106 consecutive postoperative patients treated with epidural morphine on regular surgical wards. This experience involved 4,343 total patient days of care and 11,089 individual epidural morphine injections. On a 0-10 verbal analog scale, patient-reported median pain scores at rest and with coughing or ambulation were 1 (inter-quartile range 3) and 4 (interquartile range 4), respectively. The incidence of side effects requiring medication were as follows: pruritus 24%, nausea 29%, and respiratory depression 0.2%. There were no deaths, neurologic injuries, or infections associated with the technique. Migration of epidural catheters into the subarachnoid space and into epidural veins each occurred twice. Overall, 1,051 of the 1,106 patients (95%) experienced none of the following problems: catheter obstruction, premature dislodgement, painful injections, catheter migration, infection, or respiratory depression. We conclude that postoperative pain can be safely and effectively treated with epidural morphine on surgical wards.     

Double Epidural Catheter with Ropivacaine versus Intravenous Morphine: A Comparison for Postoperative Analgesia after Scoliosis Correction Surgery

Background: Major spine surgery with a dorsal or ventrodorsal approach causes severe postoperative pain. The use of continuous epidural analgesia through one or two epidural catheters placed intraoperatively by the surgeon has been shown to provide efficient postoperative pain control. In this prospective unblinded study, the authors compared the efficacy of continuous intravenous morphine with a continuous double epidural catheter technique with ropivacaine after scoliosis correction.

Methods: Thirty patients with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III were prospectively randomized to either the morphine group or the epidural group. At the end of surgery, patients in the epidural group received two epidural catheters placed by the surgeon, one directed cephalad and one caudally. Correct placement was checked radiographically. Postoperative analgesia until the first postoperative morning was performed with remifentanil target-control infusion for all patients. From that time remifentanil was stopped and continuous intravenous analgesia with morphine or double epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.3% was initiated (T0 = beginning of study). Pain at rest and pain in motion (using a visual analog scale from 0-100), the amount of rescue analgesics, sensory level, motor blockade, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pruritus were assessed every 6 h and bowel function was assessed every 12 h until T72 (end of study). Two days later, patient satisfaction was assessed.

Results: Pain scores at rest were significantly decreased in the epidural group at all time points except at T12, T60, and T72. Pain scores in motion were significantly decreased in the epidural group at T24, T48, and T72. Bowel activity was significantly better in the epidural group at T24, T36, T48, and T60. Postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus occurred significantly less frequently in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter occurred.     

Retrospective evaluation of continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain in children

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia (EDA) in children are not well documented in larger series of patients given routine postoperative care. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of pain relief, determine the incidence and type of complications during the entire period of epidural pain treatment in children, and assess the factors affecting efficacy METHODS: Children treated postoperatively with an EDA infusion during the period 18 September 1994 to 1 January 1999 were studied. Data regarding the age, gender, efficacy of analgesia, duration of epidural infusion, types of side-effects and complications, reasons for discontinuation, and types and duration of surgery were collected daily by the Acute Pain Treatment Service. The sensory dermatomal level of the surgical incision site was included retrospectively. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighteen epidural infusions were given to 476 children. Pain relief was rated as 'good' at 76% of visits. There were no major complications or sequelae. Thirty-seven per cent of the epidural infusions were prematurely discontinued, and 21% were discontinued because of unsatisfactory analgesia. Factors related to a higher percentage of unsatisfactory function were surgical incision site located above the umbilicus, gastroenterologic surgery, protracted surgery and age. Age and duration of surgery were significantly related to unsatisfactory function. CONCLUSION: This study shows that continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain was satisfactory in most cases, and that no major side-effects or complications occurred in children nursed on regular wards. The early recognition of unsatisfactory function of an EDA is important for a child's well being.     

Postoperative epidural infusion of morphine and bupivacaine is safe on surgical wards

Background: There was an obvious need to improve the quality and safety of our postoperative pain treatment and to introduce an improved routine service on surgical wards. Methods: It was decided to use postoperative epidural infusion of morphine 0.04 mg/ml and bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml (0.25%): 4–8 ml/h as pain relief after major surgery. An education programme was run emphasising the benefits, side-effects and the importance of regular monitoring of pain intensity, vital functions (respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate), motor function of the legs and the need for additional drugs in order to detect side-effects as well as lack of adequate analgesic effect. A detailed observation sheet was used collecting information every 2 h throughout the epidural treatment period in order to secure monitoring and adjustment of the treatment. Close contact was maintained with the wards. Results: We present a detailed analysis of our first 2000 postoperative patients, mainly after orthopaedic (46.1%), gastrointestinal (32.0%), urologic (8.7%) and vascular (8.5%) surgery. Duration of the treatment was less than 24 h in 41.4% and more than 48 h in 29.7%. Pain relief was adequate in most patients, best after vascular surgery in the lower extremities (mean VAS 0.15/10.0 (95% confidence interval 0.09–0.23)) and less after gastrointestinal (mean VAS 0.49/10 (0.43–0.54)) and thoracic surgery (mean VAS 0.59/10 (0.38–0.81)). The infusion was stopped due to respiratory depression in 3 patients (0.15%). Four (0.2%) had systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg and had to be treated with vasopressors. A total of 56 (2.8%) patients were considered to be problem patients due to excessive sedation (0.4%), hypotension (0.7%), respiratory depression (1.6%) or lower extremity paralysis (0.05%). All patients had urinary catheter until 6 h after termination of the epidural treatment. One patient had the epidural catheter accidentally placed subarachnoidally and experienced severe respiratory depression. No permanent sequelae were recorded in the postoperative patients, but 2 traumatised patients developed epidural abscesses after 3 weeks of treatment, which resulted in lower extremity paralysis. Late response to the warning signs might have contributed to the irreversible paraplegia. Conclusion: Our experience with this postoperative epidural analgesia regime is favourable. It has been easy to administer and monitor. Pain relief was excellent, side-effects were few and picked up by the established routines followed by the ward staff except in the 2 trauma patients who developed epidural abscesses. The staff on the surgical wards were motivated for this kind of work. Education and strict surveillance routines are mandatory in order to secure prompt action when warning signs develops (e.g. lower limb paralysis).     

Use of a double epidural catheter provides effective postoperative analgesia after spine deformity surgery

PURPOSE: Spine deformity surgery is a painful procedure in which pain control is difficult to obtain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of double epidural catheters in this setting. METHODS: Twenty-three patients scheduled for an elective spine deformity surgery were included prospectively. At the end of surgery, the surgeon inserted two epidural catheters, one cranial, one caudal to the surgical field. In the recovery room the catheters were both injected with a bolus of bupivacaine 0.0625%. In the absence of any neurological abnormality a continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.0625%, fentanyl 2 microg.mL(-1) and clonidine 3 microg.mL(-1) was administered at a rate of 10 mL.hr(-1) through each catheter for 48 hr. Pain score, sedation level, motor block and side-effects were checked regularly. RESULTS: Complete analgesia (VAS=0) was obtained at rest in all patients. During mobilization and physiotherapy four patients (17%) had a VAS 30. No motor block was observed. Four patients (17%) had nausea and vomiting. No excessive sedation, pruritus or respiratory depression were observed. Early mobilization was possible in all patients. CONCLUSION: Postoperative epidural analgesia by means of a double catheter is an effective technique to control pain after spine deformity surgery and is associated with a low incidence of side-effects.     

Clinical experience with epidural morphine

Epidural analgesia with morphine sulphate was administered to 130 patients. Of 96 patients with postoperative pain, 74 experienced good analgesia, 14 obtained a fair degree of pain relief, and in eight the method was unsatisfactory. Of the 34 non-operated patients 30 had good pain relief and the method failed in one. The most common cause of failure of analgesia was an incorrectly placed epidural catheter. Urinary difficulties and pruritus were encountered as the principal side-effects. One patient suffered depression of the level of consciousness following epidural drug administration and in one, epidural opiate appears to have contributed to hypotension.     

Epidural morphine analgesia compared with intravenous morphine for oral cancer surgery with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer surgery with reconstruction is a complex operative procedure with morbidities such as respiratory complications and post-operative pain. These morbidities may be reduced with appropriate operative and post-operative pain management. Epidural analgesia provides better pain control than intravenous opioids after major thoraco-abdominal surgical procedures. We planned to undertake a prospective study to compare the efficacy and side-effects of epidural morphine analgesia vs. intravenous morphine in patients undergoing oral cancer surgery with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing a major surgical procedure for oral cancer with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction were prospectively randomized to receive either epidural morphine or intravenous morphine in the post-operative period. The intensity of pain was assessed daily using a 100-mm visual analogue scale. The post-operative side-effects, time to ambulation, time to tolerate first nasogastric feed, total length of hospital stay and global satisfaction score were recorded. RESULTS: The epidural morphine group had statistically significant lower pain scores at the three evaluation times through the post-operative 48 h (P < 0.05). However, the mean visual analogue scores were always below 35 in the intravenous morphine group. Patients in the epidural morphine group ambulated and accepted nasogastric feed significantly earlier than those in the intravenous morphine group. The incidence of nausea/vomiting or pruritus, the length of hospital stay and the global satisfaction score were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that epidural morphine offers better pain control than intravenous morphine after oral cancer surgery with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. Nevertheless, both methods appear to provide very good pain relief, and perhaps the extra risks inherent to epidural catheter insertion are not outweighed by the benefits in this type of surgery.     

Postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery: Fentanyl–bupivacaine patient controlled epidural analgesia versus fentanyl patient controlled intravenous analgesia

BackgroundMajor abdominal surgeries induce neurohumoral changes responsible for postoperative pain, various organ dysfunctions and prolonged hospitalization. Inadequate pain control is harmful and costly to patients thus an appropriate pain therapy to those patients must be applicated.MethodsOne hundred patients (ASA I or II) of either sex aged from 20 to 60 years were scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups (fifty patients each) to receive: patient-controlled epidural analgesia with bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl (PCEA group), or patient controlled intravenous analgesia with fentanyl (PCIA group). Postoperative pain was assessed over 24 h using Numerical Pain Rating scale (NPRS). The frequency of rescue analgesia, sedation score and overall patient satisfaction were recorded. Any concomitant events like nausea; vomiting, shivering, pruritus or respiratory complications were recorded postoperatively.ResultsThere was a significant less pain in PCEA group at 2, 8 and 12 h. postoperative but PCIA group had less pain at immediate postoperative time. As regard sedation scale, patients of the PCEA group were significantly less sedated than PCIA group at immediate postoperative only. Overall patient satisfaction was significantly more in PCEA group.ConclusionThis study concluded that both PCEA and PCIA were effective in pain relief after major abdominal surgery but PCEA was much better in pain relief, less sedating effect and overall patient satisfaction.     

Does morphine premedication influence the pain and consumption of postoperative analgesics after total knee arthroplasty?

Evidence of pre-emptive analgetic effect of opioid would offer great potential benefit to patients with postoperative pain, a better pain relief with less opioid. The aim of this double blind randomised trial was to study the effect of intramuscular morphine premedication on postoperative pain.
Forty-one patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to four groups. Two groups received epidural morphine, 4 mg immediately after operation and 3 mg ten hours later, and two groups the same volume of saline. All patients had access to intravenous PCA-fentanyl. One epidural morphine and one epidural saline group (PreEpiMo and PreMo, respectively) received morphine, 0.14 mg/kg i.m. as premedication. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Respiration was monitored by means of pulseoximetry, arterial blood gas analysis and rate of breathing.
Morphine premedication reduced postoperative pain in the immediate postoperative period in patients with epidural placebo (PreMo), hut the effect was absent in patients with PreEpiMo. Epidural morphine (EpiMo) provided stable analgesia with reduced need of PCA-fentanyl. Two patients (10%) (one in EpiMo and one in PreEpiMo) developed respiratory depression requiring naloxone treatment. The dosage of epidural morphine used in this study was a likely explanation of this depression. Nausea, vomiting, itching and urinary retention were the most frequent side effects without significant differences between the groups. In conclusion, morphine premedication had a temporary rest effect on the postoperative pain. Epidural morphine provides a better analgesia than intravenous PCA-fentanyl.     

Analgesia after caesarean section: patient-controlled intravenous morphine vs epidural morphine

In a randomized, double-blind study, conducted in 60 patients after caesarean section, we compared epidural morphine (5 mg) with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Efficacy of pain relief (visual analogue scale), comfort, satisfaction and side-effects were studied. In the PCA group, pain scores were higher (P < 0.005) from the third hour onward. The degree of comfort was similar. Overall satisfaction for the first 24 postoperative hours was higher in the epidural group when assessed on a graded scale from 0 to 10, but equal when assessed using qualitative terms. Haemodynamic and respiratory tolerance were identical without any episodes of respiratory depression or oxygen desaturation in either group. The epidural morphine group showed a higher incidence of pruritus requiring specific treatment (P < 0.005). Nausea was reported to be equal in the two groups. Consumption of morphine was higher in the PCA group. We conclude that epidural morphine analgesia, though of good quality, was associated with more pruritus. Morphine PCA, although producing a lesser degree of analgesia compared to epidural morphine, gave good satisfaction.     

Intraarticular, epidural, and intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: After total knee arthroplasty, patients regularly suffer from severe pain. It is unclear whether epidural or systemic pain therapy is superior in terms of postoperative pain relief, patients' comfort and side effects. A new therapeutic approach, intraarticular opioids, has been suggested with the detection of opioid receptors in inflamed tissue. This method has proven suitable for clinical use in small operations (e.g. knee arthroscopy). In this study, we compared epidural analgesia and intraarticular application of morphine plus "on-demand" intravenous analgesia to "on-demand" intravenous analgesia alone. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients, scheduled for total knee arthroplasty, were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: in group 1 (EPI) patients received bolus doses of morphine via an epidural catheter; in group 2 (IA) an intraarticular bolus of 1 mg of morphine was applied at the end of the operation with subsequent use of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump; group 3 (Control), in which only PCA was provided, served as control for both analgesic procedures. Main outcome measures included visual analogue pain scales, total morphine consumption, and stress hormones. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in visual analogue pain scales could be detected between the three groups. Application of intraarticular morphine did not reduce the amount of analgesics required for postoperative analgesia as compared to intravenous analgesia alone. Application of epidural morphine significantly suppressed beta-endorphine release, but did not significantly influence other stress hormones as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Epidural and intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty are equivalent methods of pain relief. In major orthopaedic procedures, application of intraarticular morphine does not reduce analgesic requirements.     

Continuous epidural infusion of morphine for pain relief after cardiac operations

Postoperative pain relief and stress hormones were examined during the use of continuous epidural infusion of morphine at a rate of 0.1 mg/hr in 30 patients (Group B) after coronary artery bypass grafting. This was compared to our routine method of postoperative analgesia of intravenous morphine 2 mg/2 hr and as needed in another 30 patients (Group A). Continuous epidural morphine infusion required occasional supplementation with intravenous morphine and achieved effective analgesia in 80% of the patients. Pain relief was adequate in 50% of the patients in Group A. The mean dose of morphine used in Group B during the first 3 postoperative days was 5 mg per patient per day and was significantly lower than that used in Group A (mean 18 mg per patient per day). Serum morphine was undetectable (below 2.5 ng/ml) in Group B and was significantly lower than that in Group A (17 ng/ml). Epidural analgesia was associated with adequate postoperative pulmonary and cardiovascular functions; nausea and vomiting occurred in two patients. Levels of postoperative stress, serum cortisol, and beta-endorphin were significantly lower in Group B than in Group A. This study shows that continuous epidural infusion of morphine at a rate of 0.1 mg/hr provides selective and effective pain relief and reduces postoperative stress after cardiac operations. This method of analgesia was also associated with minimal side effects and provides an alternate approach for treatment of pain after cardiac operations.