Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal status of healthy young adults

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that tobacco is a significant risk factor for periodontal disease; however, there have been few studies on young populations where problems of general health can be discounted. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of tobacco consumption on the periodontal condition of a young, healthy population. METHODS: The study population consisted of 304 young Caucasian males (average age 19.38 +/- 0.72 years) entering the Armed Forces. All the subjects completed a self-administered questionnaire on age, oral hygiene habits, previous dental examinations, and quantity and length of tobacco use. The periodontal examination consisted of the plaque index (PI); periodontal bleeding index (PBI); probing depth (PD); and clinical attachment level (CAL). One- and 2-way ANOVA was used to compare data recorded between smokers and non-smokers. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of subjects reported that they brushed their teeth at least once a day, but only 13% visited a dentist at least once a year. Over half (53%) were habitual smokers, 43% smoking between 5 and 20 cigarettes per day; 39% of the smokers had been smoking for less than 5 years. Mean PI was 31.24 +/- 14.88 (27.19 +/- 15.93 for smokers and 35.78 +/- 12.17 for non-smokers), with significant differences between non-smokers and those who smoked 5 to 20 cigarettes per day (26.85 +/- 16.11, P<0.0001). Mean PBI was 42.29 +/- 8.43 (non-smokers 44.67 +/- 6.53 and smokers 40.17 +/- 9.46). Significant differences were found between the PBI of the non-smokers and of those who smoked 5 to 20 cigarettes per day (39.90 +/- 9.64, P <0.0001). There were also differences in the PBI between those who brushed their teeth once (40.53 +/- 9.61) and twice (44.86 +/- 5.9) a day (P<0.0001). Mean PD was 1.62 +/- 0.43 mm (non-smokers 1.56 +/- 0.36 and smokers 1.68 +/- 0.49). Deeper probing depths were recorded among smokers than among non-smokers, with statistically significant differences (P<0.049); statistically significant differences were also found between those who attended (1.49 +/- 0.50) and those who did not attend (1.65 +/- 0.42) regular dental check-ups (P<0.031). Mean CAL 1.75 +/- 0.41 (non-smokers 1.64 +/- 0.32 and smokers 1.82 +/- 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: It may be concluded that, even at such an early age, tobacco consumption affects the periodontal health. It is necessary to inform young smokers of the risk of tobacco use regarding periodontal health.     

Smoking behaviour and knowledge in high school students in Riyadh and Belfast.

Smoking is one of the risk factor associated with onset, severity and progression of periodontal disease. AIM: The aim of the study was to examine the smoking behaviour and dental health knowledge of high school students in Riyadh and Belfast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight schools from Riyadh and 6 from Belfast were randomly selected by cluster distribution sampling method. Two hundred and ninety students from Riyadh and 144 from Belfast were included giving an overall response rate of 85%. The age range was between 16-17 years. A questionnaire was used to assess demography, smoking habits, dental health knowledge and oral hygiene practices. RESULTS: The results showed that 18% of students were smokers; 24% in Belfast and 15% in Riyadh (x2 (1) = 4.29: P = 0.04). 24% of students in Belfast and 56% in Riyadh smoked at least 1 cigarette per day. 61% of students had bleeding gums although 85% stated that they brushed their teeth at least daily. Bleeding on brushing was common with 53% of Belfast students compared with 65% from Riyadh. Students in Belfast (2.51 +/- 1.15) had significantly higher mean scores for their knowledge about gum health compared with Riyadh students (2.21 +/- 1.44) (t = 2.29: P = 0.02). There was no differences in knowledge about oral health and smoking between the students. However, non-smokers from Belfast and Riyadh (3.32 +/- 1.60) had greater knowledge about oral health and smoking than those who smoked (2.81 +/- 1.45) (t = 2.73: P = 0.007). There was no difference in knowledge about gum health between smokers and non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Smoking is more prevalent in Belfast but more cigarettes are smoked in Riyadh. As non-smokers had greater knowledge of the ill-effects of smoking upon their oral health, there is a need to develop location specific interventions to control smoking habits in late adolescence.     

Smoking-attributable periodontitis in the United States: findings from NHANES III. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND: The principal objectives of this study were to examine the relationship between cigarette smoking and periodontitis and to estimate the proportion of periodontitis in the United States adult population that is attributable to cigarette smoking. METHODS: Data were derived from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative multipurpose health survey conducted in 1988 to 1994. Participants were interviewed about tobacco use and examined by dentists trained to use standardized clinical criteria. Analysis was limited to dentate persons aged > or =18 years with complete clinical periodontal data and information on tobacco use and important covariates (n = 12,329). Data were weighted to provide U.S. national estimates, and analyses accounted for the complex sample design. We defined periodontitis as the presence of > or =1 site with clinical periodontal attachment level > or =4 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction and probing depth > or =4 mm. Current cigarette smokers were those who had smoked > or =100 cigarettes over their lifetime and smoked at the time of the interview; former smokers had smoked > or =100 cigarettes but did not currently smoke; and never smokers had not smoked > or =100 cigarettes in their lifetime. RESULTS: We found that 27.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: +/-1.8%) of dentate adults were current smokers and 23.3% (95% CI: +/-1.2%) were former smokers. Overall, 9.2% (95% CI: +/-1.4%) of dentate adults met our case definition for periodontitis, which projects to about 15 million cases of periodontitis among U.S. adults. Modeling with multiple logistic regression revealed that current smokers were about 4 times as likely as persons who had never smoked to have periodontitis (prevalence odds ratio [ORp] = 3.97; 95% CI, 3.20-4.93), after adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, and income:poverty ratio. Former smokers were more likely than persons who had never smoked to have periodontitis (ORp = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.31-2.17). Among current smokers, there was a dose-response relationship between cigarettes smoked per day and the odds of periodontitis (P <0.000001), ranging from ORp = 2.79 (95% CI, 1.90-4.10) for < or =9 cigarettes per day to ORp = 5.88 (95% CI, 4.03-8.58) for > or =31 cigarettes per day. Among former smokers, the odds of periodontitis declined with the number of years since quitting, from ORp = 3.22 (95% CI, 2.18-4.76) for 0 to 2 years to ORp = 1.15 (95% CI, 0.83-1.60) for > or =11 years. Applying standard epidemiologic formulas for the attributable fraction for the population, we calculated that 41.9% of periodontitis cases (6.4 million cases) in the U.S. adult population were attributable to current cigarette smoking and 10.9% (1.7 million cases) to former smoking. Among current smokers, 74.8% of their periodontitis was attributable to smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Based on findings from this study and numerous other reports, we conclude that smoking is a major risk factor for periodontitis and may be responsible for more than half of periodontitis cases among adults in the United States. A large proportion of adult periodontitis may be preventable through prevention and cessation of cigarette smoking.     

The effect of smoking and periodontal treatment on salivary composition in patients with established periodontitis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of smoking on the periodontal status and the salivary composition in subjects with established periodontitis before and after periodontal therapy. METHODS: Our study group included 26 healthy subjects, 12 smokers and 14 non-smokers with established periodontitis. Clinical measurements and non-stimulated whole saliva were obtained and analyzed at baseline and after scaling and root planing. Smokers presented at baseline with significantly greater probing depth (4.16+/-0.26) compared to non-smokers (3.52+/-0.32) which was statistically significant (P = 0.0268); likewise, baseline clinical attachment level was greater in smokers (4.49+/-0.31 compared to non-smokers 3.87+/-0.13; P = 0.0620). Mean plaque index was also greater in smokers compared to non-smokers (0.86 and 0.65, respectively; P = 0.0834). Baseline pretreatment sodium values were significantly greater in non-smokers (14.36 mEq/l compared to 9.31 mEq/l in smokers; P = 0.0662); likewise non-smokers exhibited 50% greater salivary calcium levels (6.04 mg/100 ml compared to 4.32 mg/100 ml in smokers; P = 0.0133). RESULTS: Post-treatment probing depth and clinical attachment level were not different between smokers and non-smokers; this in spite of significant difference in plaque index in smokers (0.35 compared to 0.13 in non-smokers; P = 0.0135). Post-treatment, smokers had reduced calcium concentration (3.58 mg/100 ml compared to 5.11 mg/100 ml in non-smokers; P = 0.0438). Treatment affected albumin level in smokers only, consequently non-smokers had significantly greater salivary albumin concentration (1.1 mg/100 ml compared to 0.38 mg/100 ml in smokers; P = 0.0274). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with established periodontitis exhibited elevated concentrations of salivary electrolytes and proteins. Within this study group, smokers exhibited greater disease level but reduced sodium, calcium, and magnesium concentrations. Smokers responded favorably to treatment. The clinical improvement eliminated the differences in salivary composition.     

Effect of smoking on crevicular polymorphonuclear neutrophil function in periodontally healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) represent the first line of cellular defences in the gingival crevice. Smoking, as probably the most important environmental risk factor for periodontitis, has been shown to adversely affect many neutrophil functions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of smoking on PMN numbers and function in periodontally healthy smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: Sixty subjects were recruited: 15 non-smokers, 15 light smokers (< 5 cigarettes/day), 15 moderate smokers (5-15 cigarettes/day) and 15 heavy smokers (> 15 cigarettes/day). Full mouth plaque index, sulcus bleeding index and probing depths were measured. Crevicular washings were obtained from all subjects to harvest PMNs. Numbers of PMNs, percentage viability, and percentage phagocytosis of opsonized Candida albicans were recorded. RESULTS: Mean plaque scores and probing depths were (non-significantly) increased in smokers compared to non-smokers. Mean sulcus bleeding index scores were significantly lower in moderate (0.10 +/- 0.10) and heavy (0.07 +/- 0.11) smokers compared to non-smokers (0.14 +/- 0.13) (p < 0.05). Compared to non-smokers (1.73 +/- 1.08 x 10(6)/ml), the numbers of PMNs were higher in light (1.98 +/- 0.96 x 10(6)/ml) and moderate (2.03 +/- 1.43 x 10(6)/ml) smokers and were lower in heavy smokers (1.68 +/- 1.18 x 10(6)/ml), though there were no significant differences in PMN counts between the groups (p > 0.05). Percentage viability of PMNs was significantly lower in light (77.6 +/- 7.8%), moderate (76.5 +/- 8.2%) and heavy (75.0 +/- 6.5%) smokers compared to non-smokers (85.5 +/- 6.0%) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the ability of PMNs to phagocytose was significantly impaired in light (58.3 +/- 4.1%), moderate (51.9 +/- 2.33%) and heavy (40.9 +/- 3.5%) smokers compared to non-smokers (74.1 +/- 4.1%) (p < 0.05), with evidence of a dose-response effect. CONCLUSION: Cigarette smoking adversely affected PMN viability and function in this periodontally healthy population.     

Cigarette smoking negatively affects healing response following flap debridement surgery

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present parallel design, controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the treatment outcome following flap debridement surgery (FDS) in cigarette smokers compared to non-smokers. METHODS: After initial therapy, 57 systemically healthy subjects with moderate to advanced periodontitis who presented with one area (at least 3 teeth) where surgery was required were selected. Twenty-eight patients (mean age: 39.6 years, 20 males) were smokers (> or = 10 cigarettes/day); 29 patients (mean age: 43.9 years, 7 males) were non-smokers. Full-mouth plaque (FMP) and bleeding on probing (BOP) scores, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and recession depth (RD) were assessed immediately before and 6 months following surgery. Only sites with presurgery PD > or = 4 mm were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Presurgery FMP and BOP were similar in smokers and non-smokers and significantly decreased postsurgery in both groups. Overall, PD reduction and CAL gain were greater, although not significantly, in non-smokers (2.4 +/- 0.9 mm and 1.6 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively) than in smokers (1.9 +/- 0.7 mm and 1.2 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively). For moderate sites (PD 4 to 6 mm), no significant differences in PD and CAL changes were found between groups. For deep sites (PD > or = 7 mm), PD reduction was 3.0 +/- 1.0 mm in smokers and 4.0 +/- 0.8 mm in non-smokers, and CAL gain amounted to 1.8 +/- 1.1 mm in smokers and 2.8 +/- 1.0 mm in non-smokers (P = 0.0477). In smokers, 16% of deep sites healed to postsurgery PD values < or = 3 mm as compared to 47% in non-smokers (P = 0.0000); 58% of deep sites in smokers showed a CAL gain > or = 2 mm, as compared to 82% in non-smokers (P = 0.0000). CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study indicated that: 1) FDS determined a statistically significant PD reduction and CAL gain in patients with moderate to advanced periodontitis; 2) smokers exhibited a trend towards less favorable healing response following FDS compared to non-smokers, both in terms of PD reduction and CAL gain; and 3) this trend reached clinical and statistical significance at sites with initial deep PD.     

Coronally positioned flap for root coverage in smokers and non-smokers: stability of outcomes between 6 months and 2 years

BACKGROUND: Smoking adversely affects the short-term outcomes of coronally positioned flap (CPF) root coverage procedures, but the long-term stability of this procedure in smokers has not been studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of smoking on the long-term outcomes of CPF in recession treatment. METHODS: CPF was used to treat a Miller Class I defect in a maxillary canine or premolar in 10 current smokers (> or =10 cigarettes daily for > or =5 years) and 10 non-smokers (never smokers). At baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months, clinical parameters, including probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession depth (RD), and width of keratinized tissue (KT), were determined. RESULTS: Intragroup analysis showed that CPF failed to maintain the gingival margin at the initially achieved position. RD significantly increased in smokers (from 0.84 +/- 0.49 to 1.28 +/- 0.58 mm) and in non-smokers (from 0.22 +/- 0.29 to 0.50 +/- 0.41 mm) between 6 and 24 months. Further analysis showed that 50% of smokers and 10% of non-smokers lost between 0.5 and 1.0 mm of root coverage in the same period. Intergroup analysis showed that smokers had significantly greater residual recession (P = 0.001) at 24 months. Both smokers and non-smokers lost CAL and experienced decreases in KT. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term stability of CPF outcomes is less than desirable, particularly in smokers. Two years after a CPF procedure, smokers have significantly greater residual recession compared to non-smokers both statistically and clinically.     

Investigation of periodontal destruction patterns in smokers and non-smokers

BACKGROUND: Previous work has suggested that tobacco smoking has a local as well as a systemic effect on the severity of periodontal disease. Objective: To test the hypothesis that smokers have more disease in the upper anterior region. METHODS: A retrospective stratified random sample of 49 non-smokers and 39 heavy smokers (>or=20 cigarettes/day) was obtained from a total of 3678 referred patients with adult periodontitis. Probing depth data were collected from clinical records and radiographic measurements were carried out on existing dental panoramic tomographs to assess the inter-proximal bone levels. RESULTS: The proportion of sites with "bone loss" 4.5 mm or greater was higher in smokers, the greatest difference being observed in upper anterior sites (smokers: 73.3+/-25.5%, non-smokers: 48.3+/-31.2%, p<0.001). A difference was also observed when the number of palatal sites probing 4 mm or greater in the upper anterior region was expressed as a proportion of all such sites in the mouth (smokers: 12.3+/-6.8%, non-smokers: 9.8+/-8.8%; p=0.050). CONCLUSION: The overall pattern of tissue destruction was consistent with a systemic effect of smoking. The suggestion of a marginal local effect of the smoking habit in maxillary anterior palatal sites requires further investigation.     

Effects of smoking on local delivery of controlled-release doxycycline as compared to scaling and root planing

This paper examines the effects of smoking on the treatment outcomes of two nonsurgical therapies: (1) scaling and root planing alone (SRP) or (2) controlled-release of subgingivally delivered doxycycline hyclate in a polylactic acid based polymer gel. Subjects from 2 9-month multicenter studies were classified as nonsmokers (never smoked: 100 subjects), former smokers (137 subjects), and current smokers (> or = 10 cigarettes/day: 121 subjects). Clinical parameters were analyzed for treated sites with baseline probing depths > or = 5 mm and for a subset of treated sites with baseline probing depths of > or = 7 mm. Clinical parameters (plaque levels, clinical attachment levels, pocket depths, and bleeding on probing) were analyzed at baseline, 4, 6, and 9 months. In the doxycycline treated group in general, there were neither marked significant differences in clinical attachment gain nor differences in probing depth reduction among the 3 smoking groups. On the other hand, in the scaling and root planing treated group in general, there were significant differences in clinical attachment gain and pocket depth reduction, with non-smokers responding better than former smokers and current smokers at 6 and 9 months. These differences in clinical response between scaling and root planing alone versus controlled-release of locally-delivered doxycycline hyclate among these 3 smoking groups are discussed in relation to treatment implications for smokers.     

吸烟对牙周基础治疗前后龈沟液量和弹性蛋白酶水平的影响

目的　评价吸烟是否影响牙周炎基础治疗前、后龈沟液 (gingivalcrevicularfluid ,GCF)量和龈沟液中弹性蛋白酶 (elastase ,EA)的水平。方法　将 37例男性慢性牙周炎患者分为吸烟组 (2 2例 ,12 2个牙位点 ,每日吸烟≥ 2 0支 )和非吸烟组 (15例 ,90个牙位点 )。牙周炎基础治疗前、后用滤纸条法收集GCF ,用Periotron 6 0 0 0龈沟液测量仪测定GCF量。对吸烟组 92个位点和非吸烟组 6 0个位点GCF样本 ,用底物分解法检测EA水平。结果　治疗前吸烟组GCF量 (139 2± 33 4 )U和EA水平(0 6 34± 0 5 87)明显低于非吸烟组 [GCF量 :(15 5 4± 39 7)U ,EA水平 :0 835± 0 5 72 ],P <0 0 1。治疗后 ,两组GCF量和EA水平均显著降低 (P <0 0 0 1)。但吸烟组 91个位点 (74 6 % )GCF和 70个位点(76 1% )的EA水平治疗后有改善 ;而非吸烟组高达 88个位点 (97 8% )GCF和 5 6个位点 (93 3% )的EA水平有改善 (P <0 0 1)。结论　治疗前探诊深度相同的情况下 ,吸烟组GCF量和EA水平均低于非吸烟组 ,治疗后吸烟组的GCF和EA的减少程度不如非吸烟组明显。     

Teeth with periodontal bone loss,cigarette smoking and plasma cotinine levels

The aim of the present study is to assess teeth with periodontal bone loss, cigarette smoking and plasma cotinine levels. We enrolled 120 untreated periodontal patients with chronic periodontitis into the study. The group comprised 48 men and 72 women, ranging in age from 21 to 75 years (mean age, 42.4 years). We divided the patients into five groups based on self-reported smoking status: (1) heavy smokers (n=35); (2) light smokers (n = 17); (3) recent former smokers (n = 8); (4) long-term former smokers (n = 17); (5) non-smokers (n = 43). We calculated packyear: (number of cigarette/day/20 x years) for all smokers. Smoking status was confirmed by measurement of plasma cotinine levels in 116 subjects. Periodontal disease was assessed on a full set of periapical radiographs. The number of teeth with bone loss was scored in four categories (no bone loss, light bone loss, moderate bone loss or serious bone loss) in all patients. The results demonstrated that plasma cotinine levels correlated significantly with the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Moreover, heavy smokers had fewer teeth with no bone loss (P < 0.001) and more teeth with moderate bone loss (P < 0.001) than non-smokers. In addition, we found a negative correlation between packyears and the number of teeth with no bone loss (P < 0.04) and a positive correlation between packyears and the number of teeth with light bone loss (P < 0.005). However, we found no correlation between plasma cotinine levels and the number of teeth with bone loss. These clinical findings suggest that cigarette smoking affects the number of teeth with or without periodontal bone loss, and this effect is related to the degree of smoking exposure.     

The effect of smoking on achieving osseointegration of surface-modified implants: a clinical report

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the effect of smoking on achieving initial osseointegration when surface-modified dental implants were used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During an 18-month period in a private practice setting 1,183 implants were placed in 461 patients. The group of smokers consisted of patients who smoked a half pack or more of cigarettes per day. RESULTS: The overall success rate for smokers and non-smokers in achieving osseointegration was 98.1%. Ninety-seven percent of the implants placed in smokers osseointegrated successfully, and 98.4% of implants placed in non-smokers osseointegrated successfully (P < .05). DISCUSSION: The surface of an implant may be a critical determinant for achieving osseointegration in patients who smoke. CONCLUSION: It appears from this short-term retrospective study that smoking does not play a significant role in achieving the osseointegration of surface-modified dental implants.     

Levels of lipid peroxides and antioxidants in smokers and nonsmokers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between cigarette smoking and periodontal damage in terms of the levels of free radicals and antioxidants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five healthy subjects in the age group 25-56 yr and with chronic moderate inflammatory periodontal disease (attachment loss of 3-4 mm) were selected. All subjects were matched with respect to the clinical parameters plaque index, gingival index and attachment loss. Of the 35 subjects, 25 were smokers (smoking a minimum of 15 cigarettes/day) and 10 were nonsmokers. Smokers were subdivided into three subgroups: group I (10 subjects smoking 15-20 cigarettes/day); group II (10 subjects smoking 21-30 cigarettes/day) and group III (five subjects smoking > 50 cigarettes/day). Gingival tissue (obtained during Modified Widman surgery) and blood samples were collected from each of the subjects and analyzed for the following parameters: lipid peroxide, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione and total thiol. RESULTS: The level of lipid peroxide was lowest in nonsmokers (2.242 +/- 0.775 in tissue and 1.352 +/- 0.414 in blood) and highest in smokers smoking > 50 cigarettes/day (6.81 +/- 1.971 in tissue and 4.96 +/- 0.890 in blood), both in tissue and in blood. The increase was statistically significant in all groups, except in tissue of group I smokers. Catalase showed a similar trend, where the levels increased from 0.245 +/- 0.043 in controls to 0.610 +/- 0.076 in group III smokers for tissue, and from 0.231 +/- 0.040 in controls to 0.568 +/- 0.104 in group III smokers for blood. The increase was statistically significant for all groups. Total thiol levels were also higher in smokers than in controls (0.222 +/- 0.050 in controls vs. 0.480 +/- 0.072 in group III smokers in tissue; 0.297 +/- 0.078 in controls vs. 0.617 +/- 0.042 in group III smokers in blood). Except for group I in both tissue and blood, the increase was statistically significant. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) level was higher in nonsmokers (2.406 +/- 0.477 in tissue and 2.611 +/- 0.508 in blood) than in group III smokers (1.072 +/- 0.367 in tissue and 0.938 +/- 0.367 in blood), both in tissue and in blood, but this was significant only in the case of blood and for group III smokers in tissue. The glutathione level in tissue was consistently lower in smokers than in controls, showing a decrease from 121.208 +/- 37.367 in controls to 46.426 +/- 14.750 in group III smokers, but the decrease was not significant in group I smokers. In the case of blood, the glutathione level dropped from 262.074 +/- 68.751 in controls to 154.242 +/- 51.721 in group III smokers, but was statistically significant only for group III smokers. CONCLUSION: The study results show that smoking increases the level of free radicals in periodontal tissues, which in turn may be responsible for the destruction seen in periodontal diseases.     

Impaired healing response of periodontal furcation defects following flap debridement surgery in smokers. A controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present parallel-design, controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the treatment outcome of periodontal furcation defects following flap debridement surgery (FDS) procedure in cigarette smokers compared to non-smokers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After initial therapy, 31 systemically healthy subjects with moderate to advanced periodontitis, who presented at least one Class I or II molar furcation defect, were selected. Nineteen patients (mean age: 40.3 years, 15 males) were smokers (>or=10 cigarettes/day) and 12 patients (mean age: 44.8 years, 3 males) were non-smokers. Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), vertical clinical attachment level (v-CAL), and horizontal clinical attachment level (h-CAL) were assessed immediately before and 6 months following surgery. RESULTS: Overall, statistically significant v-CAL gain was observed in smokers (1.0 +/- 1.3 mm) and non-smokers (1.3+/-1.1 mm), the difference between groups being statistically significant (p=0.0003). In proximal furcation defects, v-CAL gain amounted to 2.3+/-0.7 mm in non-smokers as compared to 1.0+/-1.1 mm in smokers (p=0.0013). At 6 months postsurgery, non-smokers presented a greater h-CAL gain (1.3+/-1.1 mm) than smokers (0.6+/-1.0 mm), with a statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.0089). This trend was confirmed in both facial/lingual (1.4+/-1.0 versus 0.8+/-0.8 mm) and proximal furcation defects (1.2+/-1.3 versus 0.5+/-1.2 mm). The proportion of Class II furcations showing improvement to postsurgery Class I was 27.6% in smokers and 38.5% in non-smokers. After 6 months, 3.4% of presurgery Class I furcation defects in smokers showed complete closure, as compared to 27.8% in non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicated that (1) FDS produced clinically and statistically significant PPD reduction, v-CAL gain, and h-CAL gain in Class I/II molar furcation defects, and (2) cigarette smokers exhibited a less favorable healing outcome following surgery in terms of both v-CAL and h-CAL gain.     

Secretion rate, buffer effect and number of lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans of whole saliva of cigarette smokers and nonsmokers

Secretion rate and buffer effect of resting and stimulated whole saliva, and number of lactobacilli and S. mutans in stimulated whole saliva were determined for 182 subjects, of whom 109 were cigarette smokers. For secretion rate, no difference between smokers and non-smokers was observed. The median buffer effect was significantly lower in smokers. The median numbers of lactobacilli and S. mutans were significantly higher in saliva of smokers. The number of lactobacilli was significantly correlated with number of cigarettes smoked per day. About 40% of the smokers had greater than or equal to 10(6) S. mutans CFU/ml, which was more than twice that of non-smokers. In a complementary study on 20 smokers, the immediate influence of cigarette smoking on secretion rate and buffer effect of stimulated whole saliva was investigated for 1 h after smoking. No significant effect was found.     

Secretion rate, buffer effect and number of lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans of whole saliva of cigarette smokers and non-smokers

Abstract – Secretion rate and buffer effect of resting and stimulated whole saliva, and number of lactobacilli and S. mutans in stimulated whole saliva were determined for 182 subjects, of whom 109 were cigarette smokers. For secretion rate, no difference between smokers and non-smokers was observed. The median buffer effect was significantly lower in smokers. The median numbers of lactobacilli and S. mutans were significantly higher in saliva of smokers. The number of lactobacilli was significantly correlated with number of cigarettes smoked per day. About 40% of the smokers had 10⁶ S. mutans CFU/ml, which was more than twice that of non-smokers. In a complementary study on 20 smokers, the immediate influence of cigarette smoking on secretion rate and buffer effect of stimulated whole saliva was investigated for 1 h after smoking. No significant effect was found.     

Subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage in smokers and non-smokers: a clinical and histologic controlled study in humans

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate root coverage of gingival recessions and to compare graft vascularization in smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: Thirty subjects, 15 smokers and 15 non-smokers, were selected. Each subject had one Miller Class I or II recession in a non-molar tooth. Clinical measurements of probing depth (PD), relative clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), and width of keratinized tissue (KT) were determined at baseline and 3 and 6 months after surgery. The recessions were treated surgically with a coronally positioned flap associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft. A small portion of this graft was prepared for immunohistochemistry. Blood vessels were identified and counted by expression of factor VIII-related antigen-stained endothelial cells. RESULTS: Intragroup analysis showed that after 6 months there a was gain in CAL, a decrease in GR, and an increase in KT for both groups (P <0.05), whereas changes in PD were not statistically significant. Smokers had less root coverage than non-smokers (58.02% +/- 19.75% versus 83.35% +/- 18.53%; P <0.05). Furthermore, the smokers had more GR (1.48 +/- 0.79 mm versus 0.52 +/- 0.60 mm) than the non-smokers (P <0.05). Histomorphometry of the donor tissue revealed a blood vessel density of 49.01 +/- 11.91 vessels/200x field for non-smokers and 36.53 +/- 10.23 vessels/200x field for smokers (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft was negatively affected by smoking, which limited and jeopardized treatment results.     

Gingival recession in smokers and non-smokers with minimal periodontal disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Smoking is a major risk factor for destructive periodontal disease. There is limited information with regard to effects of smoking in subjects with minimal periodontal destruction. The aim of the present investigation was to assess the development of gingival recession in young adult smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: 61 systemically healthy young adults, 19 to 30 years of age completed the final examination. 30 volunteers smoked at least 20 cigarettes per day, whereas 31 subjects were non-smokers. Clinical periodontal conditions were assessed 4x within a time period of 6 months. Site-specific analyses considering the correlated structure of data were performed. RESULTS: At the outset, 50% of subjects presented with gingival recession at 1 or more sites. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of gingival recession between non-smokers and smokers. Severe recession in excess of 2 mm affected about 23% non-smokers but only 7% smokers. Some further gingival recession developed during the 6-month observation period. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the risk for recession development appeared not to be influenced by smoking status after adjusting for periodontal probing depth, recession at baseline, tooth brushing frequency, gender, jaw, tooth type and site. CONCLUSIONS: Present data did not support the hypothesis that smokers are at an increased risk for the development of gingival recession.     

Salivary calcium reflects skeletal bone density of heavy smokers

OBJECTIVE: Our recent studies suggest, that elevated calcium concentration of saliva is characteristic of periodontitis. In this study we analyzed the effect of smoking on salivary calcium and bone density by comparing the level of salivary calcium and the ultrasound scale of bone density of heavy smokers to those of non-smokers. DESIGN: Salivary samples were collected from 603 women (50-62 years) participating in a pre-screen referral program for osteoporosis. Out of this group a total of 577 were accepted for the present study. General health, medications and tobacco smoking were recorded. The group included 487 non-smokers, 37 moderate smokers (1-10 cigarettes per day) and 53 heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day). Bone density was measured at the right heel by the quantitative ultrasound technique. Calcium and phosphate concentrations of saliva were measured and expressed as microg/ml of saliva. RESULTS: The ultrasonographic variables of the heel, broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and T-score (a standard deviation unit from mean values of healthy young adults) of heavy smokers were significantly lower than those of women who did not smoke (P = 0.007, 0.014 and 0.011, respectively). Salivary calcium concentration of heavy smokers 70.5 (14.6) microg/ml was higher than that of non-smokers 64.0 (14.1) microg/ml (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in salivary phosphate level or in the salivary flow rate between heavy smokers and non-smokers. Conclusions: Heavy smokers seem to have lower bone mineral density and higher salivary calcium than their non-smoking counterparts. We suggest that the high salivary calcium concentration of smokers is in connection with skeletal calcium disturbances.