Effects of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone pulse amplitude and frequency on LH secretion by perifused rat anterior pituitary cells

Recent studies have shown that LH secretion in vivo is pulsatile. In the present study, a cell perifusion system was employed to characterize the pituitary response to changes in LHRH pulse amplitude and frequency. Increases in pulse amplitude consistently elevated both mean LH levels and the amount of LH released in response to individual LHRH pulses. The EC50 for LHRH was approximately 3 nM. Increases in pulse frequency also increased mean LH levels, but frequencies of three or more pulses per h were associated with a decrease in the amount of LH released per pulse. Alterations in LHRH pulse characteristics changed qualitative as well as quantitative aspects of LH secretion, with high frequency, high amplitude pulses producing a biphasic response to LHRH. Initially a self-priming response was seen during the second and third hours of stimulation; this was followed by increasing desensitization of the cultures to LHRH. These results, by defining the pituitary response to specific conditions of stimulation, will help to clarify the relationship of LHRH stimulation to LH secretion in vivo.     

Gonadal steroid modulation of LHRH-stimulated LH secretion by pituitary cell cultures

Enzymatically dispersed rat pituitary cells were grown in primary culture, and LHRH-stimulated LH secretion was measured. Testosterone (T) decreased and 17 beta-estradiol (E) increased pituitary responsiveness to LHRH. The effect of E on LH secretion was partly due to an increase in LH content. There was a latent period of 12 h for E and 18 h for T between the onset of steroid treatment and the manifestation of steroid action. Neither steroid was required to be continuously present in order to exert its effects. After steroid withdrawal, the effect of T persisted for 72 h and that of E for more than 96 h. The actions of both steroids were blocked by protein-synthesis inhibitors. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that steroid effects rely on a mechanism involving alterations in protein synthesis; the affected proteins may be involved in the process of LHRH action.     

Absence of steroid-dependent, endogenous opioid peptide suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone release between diestrus 1 and diestrus 2 in the rat estrous cycle

The objective of this study was to determine whether the negative feedback action of ovarian steroids on pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) release in the diestrous 1 (D1)-diestrous 2 (D2) interval of the rat estrous cycle is mediated by endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs), by examining the pulsatile LH release response to naloxone infusions in the presence or absence of D1-D2 levels of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P). As plasma E2 and P levels increased between D1 and D2, mean blood LH levels decreased due solely to a decrease in LH pulse amplitude as frequency remained stable. However, ovariectomy increased both parameters of pulsatile LH release, indicating the effect of loss of ovarian steroid-negative feedback in this interval. Replacement of D1-D2 plasma levels of E2 and P restored D2 values for both parameters of pulsatile LH release, and E2 + P did not alter in vivo pituitary responsiveness to LH-releasing hormone (LHRH). In ovariectomized rats lacking the negative feedback provided by E2 + P in this cycle interval, continuous infusion of naloxone caused a further dose-dependent augmentation in both LH pulse amplitude and frequency. This stimulatory action of naloxone was prevented by simultaneous infusion with morphine, and was not associated with any change in in vivo pituitary responsiveness to LHRH, indicating that this was an action exerted through centrally located EOP receptors. Naloxone also increased both parameters of pulsatile LH release in E2 + P-treated rats. However, the magnitudes of the naloxone-induced increments in LH pulse amplitude and frequency in ovariectomized, steroid-treated rats were not greater than those seen in ovariectomized, nonsteroid-treated rats given naloxone versus saline. In addition, mean values for both parameters of pulsatile LH secretion during EOP receptor blockade in steroid-treated rats were reduced when compared to values in ovariectomized, nonsteroid-treated rats infused with naloxone. Thus the stimulatory effect of naloxone on pulsatile LH release was similar in the presence or absence of the negative feedback action of D1-D2 plasma levels of E2 + P. This indicates that the negative feedback effect of E2 + P on pulsatile LH release in this interval is not mediated by EOPs whose actions are blocked by naloxone.     

The influence of chronic morphine treatment on the negative feedback regulation of gonadotropin secretion by gonadal steroids

The influence of continuous stimulation of opiate receptors with morphine (M) on the negative feedback effects of testosterone (T), 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and 17 beta-estradiol (E2) on LH and FSH secretion was studied in rats that had been castrated 2 weeks previously. In the absence of gonadal steroids, 4 days of continuous M exposure did not alter LH or FSH levels. Similarly, Silastic capsules containing crystalline T (5 mm) or E2 [5 mm long (75 micrograms E2/ml) to 7.5 mm long (300 micrograms E2/ml)] alone had little effect on LH or FSH release. However, in M-exposed rats, T reduced serum LH by greater than 90%, and E2 reduced LH by more than 75%. Among the doses of DHT evaluated, only the highest dose (7.5-mm Silastic capsules packed with crystalline DHT) reduced LH secretion, and M exposure only slightly enhanced this suppression. M or gonadal steroids alone produced little change in FSH levels in castrated rats. However, the combination of M plus E2 or DHT further reduced FSH levels. Evaluation of pituitary responses to LHRH revealed that when administered alone, T did not alter, DHT reduced, and E2 enhanced the LH response to the decapeptide. Neither M treatment alone nor M plus T or DHT altered the pituitary LH response to LHRH. On the other hand, M appeared to enhance the stimulatory effects of E2 on pituitary responsiveness to LHRH. These findings suggest that the interaction of M and gonadal steroids at the level of the pituitary could not explain the observed marked suppression of gonadotropin secretion by suboptimal T or E2 during opiate receptor stimulation with M. Collectively, these observations are in accord with the view that endogenous opioid peptides may play a role in modulating the sensitivity of the hypothalamus to the negative feedback effects of gonadal steroids.     

Modulation of gonadotropin secretion by corticosterone: interaction with gonadal steroids and mechanism of action

The effects of corticosterone (B) on pituitary responsiveness to LHRH and on gonadal steroid modulation of gonadotropin secretion were investigated using primary cultures of rat pituitary cells. Cultures were treated for 2 days with steroids and then challenged with LHRH for 4 h. B inhibited LH secretion, increasing the EC50 for LHRH from 1.40 to 4.96 nM. The reduction in LH release was accompanied by an increase in cell LH, so that the total amount of LH present in the cultures was unchanged. The EC50 for the effect of B on LH secretion was 0.57 microM. B increased the total amount of FSH present in the cultures. At high concentrations of B (10-100 microM), this effect was associated with an increase in FSH secretion. Testosterone inhibited LH secretion in both the absence and the presence of B. B had no effect in the presence of maximal concentrations of testosterone but augmented the inhibitory effect of lower concentrations. Estradiol (E) stimulated LH secretion in both the absence and the presence of B. However, the stimulatory effect of E was reduced by B, so that cultures treated with both B and E secreted no more LH than untreated cultures. B inhibited the LH secretory responses to Ca2+ influx and protein kinase C activation but did not affect the response to arachidonic acid, suggesting that the mechanism of B action may involve an inhibition of arachidonic acid release. Together these results indicate that the inhibitory effects of stress on reproduction are mediated at least partially by the inhibitory effects of B on LH secretion.     

Evidence for decreased luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone pulse frequency in men with selective elevations of follicle-stimulating hormone

To examine the hypothesis that the frequency of endogenous pulsatile LHRH stimulation controls the relative secretion of FSH and LH from the pituitary, we studied men with elevated FSH levels and normal LH levels to determine whether they have an altered frequency of pulsatile LHRH secretion compared to normal men. Because peripheral blood measurements of LHRH do not reflect the pulsatile characteristics of hypothalamic LHRH secretion, and it is generally accepted that the pulse frequency of LH secretion is an index of the frequency of endogenous LHRH pulsation, we used LH pulse frequency as the indicator of LHRH pulse frequency. Frequent blood sampling was performed to characterize LH pulse patterns in five men with selective elevations of FSH and seven age-matched normal men. Beginning at 0800-0930 h, blood samples were obtained every 10 min for 24 h through an indwelling iv catheter. Serum LH and FSH levels were measured by RIA in each sample, and the pattern of LH secretion was determined. Testosterone (T), estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, and free T were measured in a pooled serum sample from each man. Men with selective elevations of FSH had fewer LH pulses per 24 h (mean +/- SEM, 10.6 +/- 0.5) than the control group (12.9 +/- 0.6; P less than 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in LH pulse amplitude (23 +/- 4 vs. 17 +/- 3 ng/ml). There were no statistically significant differences in T (4.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 6.1 +/- 0.5 ng/ml), estradiol (23 +/- 7 vs. 31 +/- 5 pg/ml), sex hormone-binding globulin (7.7 +/- 1.4 vs. 7.7 +/- 1.2 ng bound dihydrotestosterone/ml), or free T (0.16 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.23 +/- 0.04 ng/ml) in these men vs. normal subjects. We conclude that 1) compared to normal men, men with selectively elevated FSH levels have decreased LH pulse frequency, which suggests decreased LHRH pulse frequency; and 2) the relative secretion rates of LH and FSH by the pituitary may be regulated by the frequency of pulsatile LHRH secretion from the hypothalamus.     

Estrogen inhibits luteinizing hormone (LH), but not follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in hypophysectomized pituitary-grafted rats receiving pulsatile LH-releasing hormone infusions

The differential feedback actions of estrogen (E2) on gonadotropin secretion were studied by means of an in vivo isolated pituitary paradigm. Adult female rats were hypophysectomized (hypox) and the next day received single anterior pituitary transplants (graft) under the kidney capsule. At the same time rats underwent bilateral ovariectomy. On the third day each animal was fitted with a catheter system which allowed for intermittent infusions of LHRH (250 ng/5 min.h) and chronic blood sampling. Rats received LHRH infusions for 7 days. On the sixth day of LHRH infusions blood samples were collected for 4 h 5, 15, 25, 35, 45 min after each hourly LHRH pulse. After 1 h of sampling, animals received sc injections of 2 micrograms estradiol benzoate (EB; n = 5) or oil vehicle (n = 5). Plasma LH, FSH, E2, and PRL levels in samples from all groups were determined by RIA. In hypox/graft rats LH release, but not FSH release, was pulsatile in response to the hourly LHRH infusions. Injection of EB in the hypox/graft rats significantly (P less than 0.05) suppressed LH release within 3 h by 57%, while FSH was unaffected. PRL levels were elevated by approximately 10-fold in the hypox/graft animals compared to those in pituitary-intact rats. These levels, however, were not changed as a function of steroid treatment and, therefore, could not account for the effects of EB on LH secretion. On the basis of these observations we conclude that 1) a major inhibitory effect of an acute injection of EB on LH secretion is exerted by a direct action on pituitary gonadotropes, and 2) E2 can differentially affect the release of LH and FSH by an intrapituitary mechanism. It is hoped that development of this model will allow for further investigation of the cellular mechanisms that mediate feedback actions of E2 on pituitary gonadotropes exposed to intermittent LHRH stimulation.     

Ontogeny of pulsatile gonadotrophin secretion and pituitary responsiveness in male puberty in man: a mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study

The onset of puberty is characterized by a sleep-associated increase in pulsatile LH secretion which is not observed in adults. The ontogeny of gonadotrophin secretion during pubertal maturation may reflect changes in endogenous LHRH secretion, pituitary sensitivity to LHRH and/or alterations in gonadal steroid feedback. To understand the interplay between these mechanisms, we have examined the pulsatile pattern of plasma LH, FSH, testosterone, oestradiol and prolactin between 20.00 and 09.00 h and the pituitary response to repeated exogenous LHRH stimulation in 16 boys with delayed puberty (age 16.3 +/- 2.7 (S.E.M.) years) on one to four occasions in a mixed longitudinal/cross-sectional analysis. Physical maturity was determined by Tanner G staging (1-5) and clinical progress followed for a mean duration of 22.4 +/- 8.5 months during which 33 hormone profiles were obtained. Nocturnal (23.00-09.00 h) LH pulse frequency increased to a peak of 0.54 +/- 0.03/h at stage 2 which was followed by a gradual decline to 0.42 +/- 0.04/h at stage 5. The appearance of LH pulses in the evening (20.00-23.00 h), probably representative of the rest of the day, was delayed until mid-puberty from which point frequency increased to a peak of 0.53 +/- 0.08/h at stage 5. LH pulse amplitude showed a linear increase from stages 1 to 5, with nocturnal pulse amplitudes being higher than evening pulses throughout. FSH did not show a clear pulsatile pattern. The LH:FSH ratio reversed from less than 1 to greater than 1 at stage 2. The LH response to exogenous LHRH increased in parallel with LH pulse amplitude. There was no difference in the pattern of LH response to repeated LHRH stimulation as puberty advanced; the first stimulus always elicited a greater response than subsequent doses. In contrast, the FSH response to LHRH was maximal at stage 1 and became attenuated thereafter. The estimated mean nocturnal LHRH concentration or amplitude did not show any increase during pubertal maturation from 20.42 +/- 11.57 at stage 1 to 35.96 +/- 20.83 ng/l at stage 5. In conclusion, the sequential changes in this study suggest that the sleep-entrained increase in LHRH pulse frequency plays a key role at the onset of puberty. By enhancing pituitary responsiveness and setting in motion a cascade of events, this peripubertal augmentation of LHRH pulse frequency can account for most of the subsequent changes in LH, FSH and testosterone secretion during pubertal development in the male without any apparent alteration in LHRH pulse amplitude.     

Regulation of lutenizing hormone secretion and subunit messenger ribonucleic acid expression by gonadal steroids in perifused pituitary cells from male monkeys and rats.

The mechanisms by which gonadal steroids regulate gonadotropin secretion remain incompletely understood. As previous studies suggest that the pituitary actions of testosterone (T) and estradiol (E) differ in male primates and rodents, we compared the effects of 10 nM T, 0.1 nM E, and 10 nM dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on the LH response to hourly pulses of GnRH as well as the GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) and LH subunit messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in dispersed pituitary cells from intact male monkeys and rats. T suppressed (P < 0.01) and E increased (P < 0.05) GnRH-stimulated LH secretion by rat pituitary cells. With monkey pituitary cells, on the other hand, there was no significant effect of either T or DHT on GnRH-stimulated LH secretion. In E-treated monkey cells, a period of initial enhancement (P < 0.05) was followed by significant suppression (P < 0.05) of LH secretion. GnRH-R mRNA was unchanged by T or E in either rat or monkey cells. T suppressed LHbeta (P < 0.01) and alpha-subunit (P < 0.01) mRNAs, whereas E increased alpha-subunit (P < 0.01), but did not alter LHbeta mRNA levels in rat cells. In monkey cells, however, neither T nor E affected LHbeta or alpha-subunit mRNA levels significantly. Our results identify different regulatory mechanisms by which testicular steroid hormones control LH secretion by the pituitary in male primates and rodents. We propose that the primary site of androgen negative feedback in the male primate is to restrain GnRH pulsatile secretion, whereas in the male rat T also decreases gonadotropin synthesis and secretion by directly affecting the pituitary. E suppresses GnRH-stimulated LH secretion in the primate pituitary, but amplifies the action of GnRH in the rat. Our data also reveal that the action of T to suppress LH secretion and subunit mRNA in male rats is not through decreased GnRH-R gene expression.     

Control of gonadotropin secretion in the male during puberty: a decrease in response to steroid inhibitory feedback in the absence of an increase in steroid-independent drive in the sheep

The gonadostat hypothesis, i.e. that a decrease in response to the inhibitory feedback action of gonadal steroids occurs during puberty, was tested in the male lamb. Also investigated was whether a simultaneous steroid-independent rise in gonadotropin secretion could be the underlying mechanism for the reduction in steroid feedback sensitivity during puberty. Sexual maturation in intact Suffolk lambs was characterized by increases in all of the following parameters: Serum FSH and LH and LH pulse frequency (during 4-7 weeks of age), testicular size and testosterone (T) concentrations (during 7-28 weeks of age). Estradiol (E2) levels were elevated at 32 weeks. Motile spermatozoa were produced by 16-18 weeks of age. Castration at 5 weeks of age resulted in a prompt increase in gonadotropin concentrations. LH pulse frequency reached a plateau of approximately 5 pulses/4 h (n = 5) at 7 weeks of age and did not change thereafter. T or E2 replacement suppressed pulsatile LH secretion for several weeks. However, despite maintenance of constant serum T (approximately 1.0 ng/ml) or E2 (3-5 pg/ml) concentrations, LH pulse frequency began to increase after 9 weeks of age, and by 13 weeks, pulsatile secretion was apparent in all steroid-replaced castrated lambs. This was well after LH pulse frequency had ceased to increase in untreated castrated animals. These data support the gonadostat hypothesis for puberty in the male lamb. Furthermore, the temporal dissociation of increasing LH secretion in untreated castrated lambs and steroid-replaced castrated lambs suggests that a steroid-independent increase in gonadotropin secretion is not the mechanism underlying the decrease in responsiveness to steroid negative feedback.     

Oestradiol-17beta inhibits tamoxifen-induced LHRH self-priming blocking hormone-dependent and ligand-independent activation of the gonadotrope progesterone receptor in the rat

In the rat, administration of tamoxifen (TX) in the absence of oestrogen (E) induces LHRH self-priming, the progesterone receptor (PR)-dependent property of LHRH that increases gonadotrope responsiveness to itself. The oestrogen-dependent PR can be phosphorylated/activated by progesterone (P4) and, in the absence of the cognate ligand, by intracellular LHRH signals, particularly cAMP/protein kinase A. We have recently found that oestradiol-17beta (E2), acting on a putative membrane estrogen receptor-alpha in the gonadotrope, inhibits this agonist action of TX. This study investigated the mechanism by which E2 inhibits TX-elicited LHRH self-priming using both incubated pituitaries from TX-treated ovariectomized (OVX) rats and anterior pituitary cells from OVX rats cultured with TX. It was found that (1) in addition to the inhibitory effect on TX-elicited LHRH self-priming, E2 blocked P4 and adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin augmentation of LHRH-stimulated LH secretion, and (2) E2 did not affect the increasing action of TX on gonadotrope PR expression or pituitary cAMP content. Furthermore, inhibition of protein phosphatases with okadaic acid suppressed E2 inhibition of TX-elicited LHRH-induced LH secretion, while stimulation of protein phosphatases with ceramide blocked TX-induced LHRH self-priming. Together, these results indicated that membrane ER-mediated E2 inhibition of the TX-stimulated LHRH self-priming pathway involves a blockade of gonadotrope PR phosphorylation/activation, but not a deficient response of PR to phosphorylases. Results also suggested that the inhibitory effect of E2 on TX-induced LHRH self-priming is exerted through modulation of cellular protein phosphatase activity in the gonadotrope.     

SECRETORY DYNAMICS OF OESTRADIOL (E2) AND PROGESTERONE (P4) DURING PERIODS OF RELATIVE PITUITARY LH QUIESCENCE IN THE MIDLUTEAL PHASE OF THE MENSTRUAL CYCLE

Although the temporal relationship between pulsatile pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and steroid hormone release from the corpus luteum has been investigated, the secretory profiles of oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) during periods without any discernible LH pulsatile activity remain unknown. Consequently, blood was sampled at 15-min intervals for 24 h from 16 women during the midluteal phases (6-8 days after midcycle LH surge) of their cycles. LH was measured in all samples and analysed for significant pulses by the Cluster pulse algorithm. Nine studies showing the lowest LH pulse frequencies and large LH pulse amplitudes were also assessed for E2 and P4 in all samples. All three hormones were released in pulsatile fashions. Pulses of E2 and P4 were found to be synchronous. While the release frequencies for E2 (mean +/- SEM: 8.9 +/- 0.7 pulses/24 h) and P4 (8.5 +/- 0.7 pulses/24 h) were comparable, the LH pulse frequency (4.6 +/- 0.4 pulses/24 h) was found to be significantly (P less than 0.001) lower than the ovarian steroid pulse frequencies. Maximum (P less than 0.01) cross-correlation coefficients were determined at positive time lags of 28.1 +/- 7.7 min for LH/E2 and 31.7 +/- 5.8 min for LH/P4, indicating that changes in E2 or P4 levels tended to occur within approximately 30 min following LH concentration changes. Further, the degree of concomitance between a steroid pulse and an LH peak was much higher (P less than 0.001) than by chance. Maximum (P less than 0.01) cross-correlation coefficients between E2 and P4 hormonal data series were found at zero time lag, suggesting that these sex steroids were secreted simultaneously. The pulse amplitudes, pulse durations and areas under the peaks of those E2 or P4 pulses preceded by large (greater than 5 IU/l) amplitude LH pulse were significantly greater (P less than 0.05 or less for all comparisons) than for steroid pulses not associated with preceding LH pulses. Thus, two populations of steroid pulses were observed; one associated with preceding LH pulses and having greater magnitude of all pulse attributes (duration, amplitude, area under the peaks), and another, not associated with preceding LH pulses and having pulse characteristics of lower magnitude. This observation suggests that the pulsatile release of ovarian steroids is a result of the episodic modulating influence of LH and that pulsatile steroid hormone secretion pertains with smaller magnitude during periods of relative pituitary quiescence of LH pulsatility.     

Androgenic and oestrogenic steroid participation in feedback control of luteinizing hormone secretion in male sheep

The acute castrate ram (wether) was used as an experimental model to investigate the site(s) of feedback on luteinizing hormone (LH) by testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and oestradiol. At the time of castration, wethers were implanted subdermally with Silastic capsules containing either crystalline testosterone (three 30 cm capsules), dihydrotestosterone (five 30 cm capsules) or oestradiol (one 6.5 cm capsule). Blood samples were taken at 10 min intervals for 6 h 2 weeks after implantation to determine serum steroid concentrations and to characterize the patterns of LH secretion. Pituitary LH response to exogenous LRH (5 ng/kg body weight) were also determined at the same time. The steroid implants produced serum concentrations of the respective hormones which were either one-third (testosterone) or two-to-four times (dihydrotestosterone, oestradiol) the levels measured in rams at the time of castration. Non-implanted wethers showed rhythmic pulses of LH (pulse interval 40-60 min) and had elevated LH levels (16.1 +/- 1.6 ng/ml; mean +/- SE) 2 weeks after castration. All three steroids suppressed pulsatile LH release and reduced mean LH levels (to below 3 ng/ml) and pituitary LH responses to LRH. Inhibition of pulsatile LH secretion by all three steroids indicated that testosterone as well as its androgenic and oestrogenic metabolites can inhibit the LRH pulse generator in the hypothalamus. Additional feedback on the pituitary was indicated by the dampened LH responses to exogenous LRH.     

Studies on the feedback regulation of gonadotropin concentrations in male rats. (III). The effects of testosterone and its metabolites on gonadotropin secretion from rat pituitary cells in culture

To determine whether dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or estradiol (E2) exerts negative or positive feedback effects on rat pituitary gland, Testosterone (T) metabolite (T, DHT, 5 alpha-androstane-3 alpha, 17 beta-diol:3 alpha-diol or E2) was added to the cultured pituitary cells. Anterior pituitary glands were obtained from 6-week-old male rats. Pituitary cells were prepared by trypsin digestion and incubated with various concentrations of steroid hormones for 72 h to determine the effects of steroid hormones on basal secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) after 48 h preculture without steroids. Then 10 nM luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) with appropriate concentrations of these steroid hormones was added to the pituitary cells in culture and incubated for another 6h to determine the effects of steroid hormones on LH-RH induced gonadotropin release. After the incubation, pituitary cells were lysed with 0.1% Triton X100 to measure the intracellular gonadotropin content. The concentration of LH and FSH was determined by radioimmunoassay. T, DHT and 3 alpha-diol stimulated basal FSH but not basal LH secretion, and inhibited both the release of FSH and LH from cultured pituitary cells during incubations with LH-RH in a dose-dependent fashion. Intracellular content of both FSH and LH were increased, and total FSH and not LH was also increased by the addition of DHT in a dose-dependent manner. E2 did not exert any of such effects on pituitary cells in culture. These studies suggest that 5 alpha-reduced metabolites but not aromatized metabolite of T play an important role on feedback regulation of gonadotropin secretion at pituitary level. DHT directly acts on pituitary gland not only to stimulate the production of FSH but also to suppress FSH and LH secretion induced by LH-RH.     

Simultaneous measurement of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone, LH, and follicle-stimulating hormone release in intact and short-term castrate rats

The temporal relationship between LHRH release and gonadotropin secretion as well as the effects of castration on LHRH release were investigated in conscious, freely moving male rats. LHRH release was measured in hypothalamic/median eminence perfusates, while levels of pituitary gonadotropins (LH, FSH) were determined in sequential blood samples obtained via atrial catheters. Twenty-four to 26 h before experiments, rats underwent sham surgery or castration. LHRH release in push-pull perfusates from both groups was pulsatile, and nearly all identified LH pulses (83.3%) were temporally associated with LHRH pulses. Of the fewer irregular FSH pulses that were observed, only 43.7% were temporally associated with LHRH pulses. Mean LHRH pulse amplitude and mean LHRH levels were not different in intact and castrate animals. The frequency of LHRH pulses was moderately increased in castrate rats (1.30 pulses/h) compared to that in intact animals (0.83 pulses/h), and this acceleration was accompanied by a significant increase in LH pulse frequency, pulse amplitude, and mean level. It was also noted that the number of silent LHRH pulses (those not associated with LH pulses) was dramatically reduced in castrate animals. Characteristics of gonadotropin release (pulse frequency, pulse amplitude, and mean level) were not significantly different in animals undergoing push-pull perfusion/bleeding procedures from those in rats not receiving push-pull cannula implants. We conclude from these studies that 1) LH pulses show a high concordance with LHRH pulses, providing evidence that the LHRH pulse generator operates as the neural determinant of LH pulses in male rats, 2) FSH secretion is not associated with LHRH release in an obvious and consistent manner, suggesting that LHRH/FSH relationships are not easily discerned in these animals or that a FSH-releasing factor distinct from the LHRH decapeptide may regulate FSH secretion, 3) a modest increase in LHRH pulse frequency occurs 24-30 h after castration, and 4) silent LHRH pulses occur with much greater regularity in intact than in castrate rats. The latter two observations suggest that both hypothalamic and intrapituitary sequelae of castration may be critically important in the development of postcastration increases in LH secretion and the negative feedback of gonadal steroids.     

Endogenous opioid regulation of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion during sexual maturation in the female sheep

The developing female sheep, which attains puberty after 25 weeks of age, was used as an experimental model to investigate the role of endogenous opioid peptides in the control of pulsatile LH secretion during sexual maturation. Treatment of ovary-intact prepubertal sheep at 12 weeks of age with the opiate antagonist naloxone resulted in a dose-dependent increase in LH secretion. Subsequent studies used ovariectomized (OVX) lambs implanted with capsules containing 17 beta-estradiol to provide a constant, ovarian steroid feedback signal throughout development. Naloxone treatment (hourly iv injections of 1 mg/kg BW for 4 h) produced an increase in the frequency of episodic LH secretion at all prepubertal ages, when lambs were highly sensitive to the estradiol negative feedback. However, increases in LH pulse frequency were also induced by naloxone treatment at a postpubertal age in estradiol-treated OVX sheep, indicating that opioid inhibition is still present at a time when sensitivity to the feedback effects of ovarian steroids is markedly reduced and endogenous LH secretion is increased. These observations in ovary-intact and estradiol-treated OVX lambs suggest that opioid mechanisms inhibit pulsatile tonic LH secretion during both the prepubertal and postpubertal periods. Endogenous opioid inhibition of LH secretion is not dependent on the presence of ovarian steroids, as evidenced by the response to naloxone 3 weeks after removal of an estradiol implant from OVX lambs, when LH pulse frequency was already high. Naloxone treatment increased LH pulse frequency further, at both a prepubertal age (18 weeks) and a postpubertal age (38 weeks). Naloxone also increased LH pulse frequency in OVX lambs in which LH secretion was inhibited chronically by progesterone rather than by estradiol. The response to naloxone was similar in postpubertal P-treated OVX lambs and age-matched prepubertal P-treated OVX controls in which puberty had been delayed by means of an inhibitory seasonal photoperiod. In addition, after removal of steroid implants to allow LH secretion to increase, the degree of inhibition of LH secretion by the opiate agonist morphine was similar between age-matched postpubertal sheep and those with photoperiodically delayed puberty. We conclude that endogenous opioid mechanisms are an important inhibitory mechanism controlling pulsatile LH secretion in the developing sheep. However, changes in opioid inhibition are unlikely to underlie the decrease in sensitivity to steroid negative feedback and increase in pulsatile LH secretion that occur at puberty.     

Effect of pulsatile luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone administration on pituitary-gonadal function in elderly man

The effect of short-term pulsatile LHRH administration was studied in 8 healthy subjects ranging from 60 to 81 yr to see if the decrease of pituitary gonadal function could be in part due to changes in the discharge of LHRH from the hypothalamus. Gonadotropin and testosterone (T) secretion was evaluated two weeks before and during LHRH (122-160 ng/kg bw every 120 min sc) infusion. In addition, a bolus dosage of LHRH (50 mu iv) was given both at the beginning and at the end of pulsatile LHRH administration in order to test gonadotrophs sensitivity. A significant increase in gonadotropin levels from day 0 to day 4 was found, and was followed by a subsequent decrease from day 7 to day 14. A slight significant increase in T levels was observed during LHRH administration (p less than 0.01). LH pulses were identified in 5 out of 8 subjects on day 0. On day 14, all the exogenous LHRH pulses were followed by significant LH bursts. There was not a significant decrease in the pituitary LH responsiveness to LHRH test from day 0 to day 14. Our study seems to indicate that pituitary - gonadal unit in normal elderly men can be modulated by pulsatile administration of LHRH. A pulse frequency of LHRH which is probably similar to the physiological one, could induce a slight increase in T levels via qualitative changes in LH activity. We can assume that clinical changes in gonadal activity might also be connected to some disturbances in endogenous LHRH pulsar.     

Evidence that pulsatile follicle-stimulating hormone secretion is independent of endogenous luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone

Although LHRH can stimulate the release of both LH and FSH from the pituitary, there are a number of instances in which the secretion of LH and FSH are divergent. Previous studies from our laboratory have indicated that pulsatile LH and FSH secretion are independently regulated by gonadal factors. We have, therefore, reexamined the role of LHRH in regulating pulsatile gonadotropin secretion by evaluating the effect of passive LHRH immunoneutralization on LH and FSH secretion in castrate adult male rats. Injection of 500 microliters ovine anti-LHRH serum no. 772 (LHRH-AS) into 2-week-castrate rats caused an 85% suppression of mean plasma LH levels by 2 h, which lasted through 48 h. Mean plasma FSH, however, was reduced by only 19% after 2 h and by only 59% after 48 h. When cannulated 2-week-castrate rats were bled every 10 min, both LH and FSH were secreted in a pulsatile manner. Injection of 500 microliters LHRH-AS caused an immediate abolishment of LH pulses and a rapid reduction in mean plasma LH through 24 h. Pulsatile FSH secretion, as characterized by the parameters of pulse frequency and amplitude, was unaffected by LHRH-AS, although mean plasma FSH levels were significantly reduced. Collectively, the results suggest that pulsatile FSH secretion is regulated by a separate factor(s) distinct from LHRH, but that LHRH is required for the maintenance of elevated FSH levels.     

Dissociated changes of pituitary luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) receptors and responsiveness to the neurohormone induced by 17 beta-estradiol and LHRH in vivo in the rat

A single injection of 17 beta-estradiol into castrated male or female rats results in an initial decrease in plasma concentrations of LH and pituitary responsiveness to LHRH, followed by a rapid return to normal or slightly elevated values. Under such experimental conditions, no acute change of binding of [125I-labeled D-Ser(TBU)6]LHRH ethylamide to anterior pituitary homogenate could be observed. Moreover, the self-priming effect of LHRH, as illustrated by a 10-fold increase in the LH response to a second injection of LHRH in the afternoon of proestrus, is accompanied by a 40% loss of pituitary LHRH receptors. During the estrous cycle, a 100% increase in pituitary LHRH receptors is already found on diestrus II, while the maximal LH responsiveness to LHRH occurs later, namely on the afternoon of proestrus. The present findings of a dissociation between changes in LHRH receptor levels and LH responsiveness to the neurohormone suggest that postreceptor events play a predominant role in the control of gonadotropin secretion by sex steroids and LHRH itself. Moreover, LHRH can cause an acute down-regulation of its own receptor in the anterior pituitary gland.     

Inhibitory effect of central LHRH on LH secretion in the ovariectomized ewe

The role of central luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) in the control of pulsatile LHRH and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion was investigated in ovariectomized adult ewes. Injection of LHRH (2.1-21 pmol) into the third cerebral ventricle caused a delayed but sustained inhibition of LH secretion. Pulse frequency, pulse amplitude and mean LH levels were reduced significantly when compared with the responses to the control injection of saline (50 microliters). The inhibitory effect of centrally administered LHRH was not accompanied by a reduction in the pituitary responsiveness to intravenous LHRH. In contrast to the effect on LH, plasma levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and prolactin were unaffected by central LHRH. The inhibitory action of LHRH was antagonized by prior injection of an LHRH antagonist ([N-Ac-D-Nal(2)1, D-p-Cl-Phe2, D-Trp3, D-hArg (Et2)6, D-Ala10] LHRH, 69 pmol) into the third ventricle. Central injection of the LHRH antagonist alone (at the same concentration) did not influence any characteristic of pulsatile LH secretion. In conclusion, these data indicate that exogenous administration of LHRH into the brain exerts a dose-related and receptor-mediated inhibition of LHRH pulse generator activity. However, the physiological significance of endogenous LHRH in the regulation of the LHRH pulse generator remains unresolved.