Efficacy of oral sildenafil in hemodialysis patients with erectile dysfunction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil to treat erectile dysfunction (ED) in chronic renal failure in patients on hemodialysis (HD). A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral sildenafil (50 mg) administered as required in HD patients with ED was designed. Patients on HD for at least 6 mo and who had a stable relationship with a female sexual partner were included. Patients older than 70 yr with penile anatomic abnormalities, cirrhosis, diabetes, angina, severe anemia, and those who were on nitrate treatment or with a recent history of stroke or myocardial infarction were not included. The International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) was employed to evaluate ED and treatment response. Forty-one patients were evaluated (21 received placebo, and 20 sildenafil). Baseline clinical and demographic parameters were similar in both groups. Sildenafil was associated with improvement in the score of all questions and domains of the IIEF, except those related to sexual desire. Using the erectile function domain to evaluate primary efficacy, improvement was observed in 85% of the sildenafil patients compared with 9.5% of placebo patients. Sildenafil use resulted in normal EF scores in 35% of sildenafil patients. Sildenafil was well tolerated. Headaches and flushing occurred in both groups. Dyspepsia was reported by two patients in the sildenafil group. In conclusion, oral sildenafil seems to be an effective and safe treatment for ED in selected patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis.     

The utility of sildenafil citrate for infertile men with sexual dysfunction: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use the sildenafil citrate, recognized as a first-line therapy for men with erectile dysfunction (ED), and which is safe and effective in men with various causes and severity of ED, including psychogenic ED, in a population of infertile men with sexual dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Infertility is a major source of life stress and might be associated with sexual dysfunction through the erosion of self-esteem and self-confidence, and in stimulating discord in a relationship. Men presenting for evaluation of fertility who on questioning by the physician reported the recent onset of sexual dysfunction, had a history taken, a physical examination, hormonal profile, and completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), a validated inventory for assessing sexual dysfunction. Thirty men with a score of <26 on the erectile function domain of the IIEF, or who complained of new onset rapid or delayed ejaculation, were treated with sildenafil with no randomization or placebo control. The evaluation was repeated and the IIEF completed again > or =3 months after starting treatment. RESULTS: For men complaining of ED, subjective erectile rigidity, duration of erection, and the percentage of successful penetration attempts significantly improved with sildenafil. The mean (sd) IIEF domain scores for erection and satisfaction, at 18 (4) vs 27 (3), and 12 (2) vs 16 (3) (both P = 0.01), and orgasm, at 4 (1) vs 6 (3) (P = 0.001), respectively, significantly improved after treatment. In patients with ejaculatory dysfunction, the function improved in 64% after sildenafil therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the nature of sexual dysfunction associated with male-factor infertility, and showed the efficacy of sildenafil therapy in men with this condition.     

Efficacy of sildenafil in male dialysis patients with erectile dysfunction unresponsive to erythropoietin and/or testosterone treatments

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo), testosterone (T) or a combination of them in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in hemodialysis patients, as well as the efficacy of sildenafil in patients unresponsive to combination treatment. A total of 23 patients with ED were divided into two groups. The international index of erectile function (IIEF) was used to evaluate ED and treatment response. Patients received Epo or T treatments for 12 weeks. Later on both groups received combination treatment for another 12 weeks. Although IIEF scores increased significantly in both groups after the combination treatment, the score changes were similar. After combination treatment, 16 patients still having IIEF score <26 were given sildenafil treatment in combination with Epo while T was discontinued. Although the IIEF scores increased significantly in all patients (17.4%), only eight of them attained an IIEF score of > or =26. The baseline IIEF scores of the patients with satisfactory response to the sildenafil treatment were higher than those with unsatisfactory response. The patients with a score of > or =22 responded better to the treatment. Although Epo and/or T therapies could partially improve ED in male dialysis patients besides correcting renal anemia and hypogonadism, sildenafil treatment could improve ED in unresponsive patients. Especially, those with higher baseline IIEF scores benefited more.     

Erectile dysfunction and the effects of sildenafil treatment in patients on haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction, including erectile dysfunction, is common in patients with uraemia. Despite successful treatment of male sexual dysfunction with sildenafil in non-uraemic population, its efficacy in dialysis patients is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 35 male HD patients (mean age 48+/-12 years) and 15 male CAPD patients (mean age 44+/-12 years) were included. In the baseline period, haemoglobin, serum urea, and albumin, Kt/V, several hormonal parameters, Beck depression scale, and penile Doppler blood flow, (peak systolic velocity after intracavernous papaverine administration) were measured. The international index of erectile function (IIEF) form was used to evaluate erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil was given to patients with erectile dysfunction at a dose of 50-100 mg/day twice a week. RESULTS: The percentage of erectile dysfunction was similar between patients on HD (71%) and those on CAPD (80%). Patients with erectile dysfunction were significantly older and had lower free-testosterone serum levels and penile blood flow than those without. In linear regression analysis for baseline IIEF score, penile blood flow was the only independent variable associated with erectile dysfunction. IIEF score increased to a similar extent after sildenafil treatment in both HD patients (from 8.10+/-5.54 to 21.70+/-9.61, P<0.001) and CAPD patients (from 9.90+/-3.87 to 21.60+/-10.18, P=0.011). Changes in IIEF scores after sildenafil treatment were associated with baseline penile blood flow as an independent variable by linear regression analysis. Adverse events observed during sildenafil treatment were dyspepsia in two patients and headache in one patient. CONCLUSION: The rate of erectile dysfunction is high in dialysis patients. Penile blood flow is the most important factor for predicting both the development of erectile dysfunction and the response to sildenafil therapy in such patients. Oral sildenafil is an effective, reliable, well-tolerated treatment for uraemic patients with erectile dysfunction.     

Evaluation of the effectiveness of sildenafil using questionnaire methods versus audio-visual sexual stimulation

AIM: In the present study, an audio-visual sexual stimulation (AVSS) test was used to evaluate the effectiveness of sildenafil, and the AVSS test was coevaluated with the international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire. METHODS: Forty-two patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) were examined (age range, 28-73 years; mean, 51.9 +/- 11.4 years). Each patient answered the IIEF questionnaire and underwent laboratory tests and the AVSS test before administration of sildenafil. The IIEF questionnaire and AVSS test (1 h after administration of 25 mg or 50 mg sildenafil) were re-evaluated in the outpatient clinic 4 weeks later. Questions 3 and 4 of the IIEF test were used to evaluate the effectiveness of sildenafil. Sildenafil was determined to be effective if each score totalled four or five after administration. RESULTS: The rate of effectiveness of sildenafil was 52.4%, and the mean score of the IIEF 5 improved from 7.2 to 15.4 following treatment with sildenafil. The maximum and mean rigidity of the penile tip improved after the sildenafil treatment (36.1%vs 57.7% and 14.2%vs 35.8%, respectively). The maximum and mean rigidity of the penile base rose (42.4%vs 57.7% and 17.9%vs 36.8, respectively). Similarly, following treatment with sildenafil, the penile tumescence increased from 6.6 cm to 7.6 cm at the penile tip and from 7.5 cm to 8.5 cm at the penile base. CONCLUSIONS: In some ED patients the results of the IIEF questionnaire are not always consistent with those of objective evaluation, including AVSS. In these patients, combined assessment using the IIEF and AVSS might be more useful to evaluate the precise effectiveness of sildenafil, rather than relying on the IIEF results alone.     

Positive effect of counseling and dose adjustment in patients with erectile dysfunction who failed treatment with sildenafil

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) stop using sildenafil due to subjective failure. This study examined whether counseling and maximal dosing (100 mg) could achieve better treatment compliance and could possibly improve treatment outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were recruited by newspaper advertisements and referred to 5 ED centers throughout the country. Details about their previous experiences with sildenafil were recorded and following an explicit explanation about the nature and action of the drug, were offered to enter the study. Instructions on drug use were provided during each visit in which four 100 mg Sildenafil tablets were provided. Treatment outcomes were assessed by the international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire after taking 4 and 8 tablets. In 2 ED centers a short video with sexual counseling content was added in between visits. RESULTS: The study cohort was comprised of 220 patients aged 27-88 years. The majority reported having received limited or no instructions on drug use when sildenafil was first prescribed. A significant increase in IIEF erectile function domain scores (EFDS) between visits 1, 2 and 3 was observed (10.96+/-0.40, 16.73+/-0.51 and 17.82+/-0.55 mean+/-SE, respectively), with 23.6% of the study patients achieving normal erectile function at the end of the study. The parameters of age and initial severity of ED most influenced treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: Counseling and dose adjustment were directly influential in achieving an excellent response to a second trial of sildenafil in patients with ED who had previously failed treatment with the drug, and obviated their needing to seek more invasive measures.     

Quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury receiving Viagra (sildenafil citrate) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose, two-way crossover study conducted June 1996 through January 1997. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of sildenafil citrate (VIAGRA(R)) on the quality of life (QoL) of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) caused by spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Study centers in Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. METHODS: Questions 13 and 14 of the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) addressed QoL issues directly related to ED in 178 men with SCI. A 5-item questionnaire addressing concerns that men had about their erection problems was also used to evaluate the impact of ED on QoL. Several commonly used psychometric instruments, including the Medical Outcomes Survey (MOS) Short Form-12, Psychological General Well-Being Index, and MOS Family Survey, assessed general QoL issues. RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen for overall satisfaction with sex life (IIEF Q13), sexual relationship with partner (IIEF Q14), and concerns about erectile problems (P<0.0001). Improvements were reported in scores for the generic QoL parameters of mental health, well-being, depression, and anxiety (P<0.05 sildenafil versus placebo). CONCLUSION: Treatment with sildenafil can significantly improve key QoL parameters in men with ED caused by SCI. Sponsorship: This study was funded by Pfizer Inc. Spinal Cord (2000) 38, 363 - 370.     

Sildenafil reduces bother associated with erectile dysfunction: pooled analysis of five randomized, double-blind trials

Improvement in bother associated with erectile dysfunction (ED) is an important aspect of successful treatment of ED. Changes in erectile function and the bother associated with ED were assessed in this analysis of pooled data from five 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose studies of sildenafil. Men who received sildenafil (n=578, vs placebo, n=550) had significantly greater (least squares mean+/-s.e.) improvement in erectile function (EF) domain scores of the international index of erectile function (IIEF) (10.0+/-0.3 vs 1.0+/-0.3, P<0.0001) and in erection distress scale (EDS) total transformed score (18.8+/-0.8 vs 4.8+/-0.9, P<0.0001). Scores on individual questions of the EDS were 24-65% higher after treatment with sildenafil (vs 8-12%, for placebo). The change in EF domain score correlated positively with the change in total transformed EDS score (0.43, P<0.0001). Successful treatment of ED with sildenafil may reduce the bother associated with ED.     

Combination therapy: medicated urethral system for erection enhances sexual satisfaction in sildenafil citrate failure following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

The objective of our study was to assess the effectiveness of combining medicated urethral system for erection (MUSE) with sildenafil citrate in men unsatisfied with the sildenafil alone. Baseline and follow-up data from 23 patients (mean age, 62.5 +/- 5.23 years) unsatisfied with the use of the sildenafil citrate alone for the treatment of erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (mean use, 4 attempts/100-mg dose) was obtained. All patients started oral sildenafil citrate more than 6 months after radical prostatectomy. Combination therapy was initiated using 100 mg sildenafil citrate orally 1 hour prior to intercourse. Patients used combination therapy for a minimum of 4 attempts prior to assessment with the Sexual Health Inventory of Men (International Index for Erectile Function-5) and visual analog scale to gauge rigidity (0-100). The effect of therapy on the total International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF) score and penile rigidity score was assessed. Of the 23 patients, 4 (17%) had no improvement with the addition of medicated urethral system for erection and discontinued the drug, while 19 (83%) reported improvement with the penile rigidity and sexual satisfaction. The IIEF scores of these 19 patients showed significant improvements in each sexual domain, and the patients reported that erection was sufficient for vaginal penetration 80% of the time. Rigidity scores on a scale of 0-100 with sildenafil alone averaged 38% (23-53) for men and 46% (26-67) for their partners. With the addition of MUSE, scores increased to 76% for men and 62% for their partners. We conclude that the addition of MUSE to sildenafil improved sexual satisfaction and penile rigidity in patients unsatisfied with sildenafil alone.     

Clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil in elderly patients with erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical disorder affecting elderly men. Sildenafil citrate has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated oral agent for treating ED in the general population of adult men with ED of broad-spectrum etiology. Elderly men are more likely to have concomitant medical problems than the general population of men with ED. In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of sildenafil administration in elderly patients with ED. Forty-four elderly men with ED (> or = 60 years old) of broad-spectrum etiology were treated with 25 mg or 50 mg doses of sildenafil citrate. Age ranged from 60 to 78 years (65 +/- 4.5; means +/- S.D.). Mean follow-up period was 12.3 +/- 6.5 months, with a range of 1 to 25 months. Primary efficacy assessments were performed using the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) before their first dose of sildenafil and after at least 4 weeks of therapy. Serum testosterone was measured before treatment. The mean IIEF5 among all patients increased from 8.5 +/- 3.9 to 20 +/- 4.2 after sildenafil use (P < 0.0001). In patients younger than 70 years, the IIEF5 score increased from 9.5 +/- 5.0 to 17 +/- 4.3 while in patients 70 years and older, the score increased from 8.2 +/- 3.6 to 21 +/- 3.9, a near normalization. The rate of improvement in younger men was higher than in older men. Serum testosterone before treatment was similar in the two groups. The most commonly experienced adverse events were flushing and dyspepsia, which occurred in 6.8% and 2.3%, respectively. No patients discontinued sildenafil treatment due to adverse events. In conclusion, oral sildenafil is efficacious and well tolerated by elderly men with ED, even among those older than 70 years.     

Safety and efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treating erectile dysfunction in patients with combat‐related post‐traumatic stress disorder: a double‐blind,randomized and placebo‐controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sildenafil citrate for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients with combat‐related post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 266 combat‐exposed war veterans with ED (aged 37–59 years) were recruited. They met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders‐IV criteria for PTSD according to the Structured Clinical Interview for Patients, Investigator Version. The patients were also evaluated with the Clinician‐Administered PTSD Scale, both to establish the diagnosis of PTSD and to measure symptom severity. Only patients with psychogenic ED were included in the study. Patients with comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, Peyronie’s disease) and smokers of more than five cigarettes daily were excluded. The patients were randomly divided into a group of 133 who received 100 mg of on‐demand sildenafil 0.75–2 h before sexual stimulation, and 133 who received placebo. Patients were asked to use ≥16 doses or attempts at home. The efficacy of the treatments was assessed every four attempts during treatment, and at the end of the study, using responses to the 15‐question International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile diary questions 2 and 3, Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire, patients’ event logs of sexual activity, and a Global Assessment Question about erections.

RESULTS

Sildenafil did not produce significantly and substantially greater improvement than placebo in each of the primary and secondary outcome measures (P = 0.08). A normal EF domain score (≥26) at endpoint was reported by 13 (9.8%), and 11 (8.3%) of patients on the sildenafil and placebo regimens, respectively (P = 0.09). Patients treated with sildenafil had no statistically significantly greater improvement in the five sexual function domains of the IIEF questionnaire than those treated with placebo (P = 0.08). The incidences of treatment‐emergent adverse events were significantly greater in the sildenafil arm than in the placebo group (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Sildenafil is no better than placebo in treating PTSD‐emergent ED. Further randomized clinical trials are warranted in combat veterans and other populations with PTSD to better elucidate the role of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in treating PTSD‐emergent ED.     

Efficacy of sildenafil in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy

Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) is an important cause of iatrogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). While sildenafil has been widely used since its introduction as a new treatment option for ED, its efficacy in post-RRP patients has not been extensively studied. We retrospectively compared the efficacy of sildenafil in post-RRP and non-surgical patients with ED (NSED) using a subset of questions from the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and correlated results with their specific etiology of ED based on penile blood flow study (PBFS). A brief questionnaire regarding satisfaction with sildenafil was administered to 72 consecutive post-RRP patients (nerve sparing status unknown) and 32 consecutive NSED patients who had previously undergone PBFS with pharmacotesting as part of their evaluation for ED. PBFS diagnoses were arterial insufficiency (AI) for peak systolic velocity (PSV) < 25 cm/sec; venogenic (CVOD) for PSV > or = 35 cm/sec, mixed vascular for PV > 25 but < 35 cm/sec and resistive index (RI) < 0.9; a vascular normal diagnosis (neurogenic impotence) required excellent rigidity sustained for 20 min. Differences in the IIEF subscores for the different groups of patients were assessed. Success with sildenafil was defined as moderate or excellent improvement (3/4 or 4/4) with ability for penetration. No differences were found among the different subgroups of RRP patients with respect to IIEF scores or success rates with sildenafil. NSED patients had both significantly higher post-treatment IIEF scores (3.6/3.4 vs 2.5/2.2; t=4.50, P<0.0001) and success rates (63% vs 31%; t=3.11, P < 0.01) with sildenafil treatment than RRP patients. We found that sildenafil is significantly less effective in impotent RRP patients than in age-matched patients with ED (31% vs 63%). We had postulated that sildenafil would be least effective among RRP patients with excellent sustained rigidity to PGE1, as this subgroup is likely to have neurogenic impotence. We found that sildenafil response rates among subgroups of RRP patients were statistically similar regardless of PBFS diagnosis. IIEF scores for the RRP subgroups were similar but statistically lower than in men with ED and no history of RRP. While individuals with normal vascular responses to PGE1 have an increased likelihood of having neurogenic impotence, in RRP patients, we were unable to demonstrate any difference in efficacy of sildenafil, regardless of the PBFS diagnosis.     

Randomized study of testosterone gel as adjunctive therapy to sildenafil in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction who do not respond to sildenafil alone

PURPOSE: We compare the efficacy of testosterone gel (T-gel) versus placebo as adjunctive therapy to sildenafil in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction who do not respond to sildenafil alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study was performed. A total of 75 hypogonadal men (18 to 80 years old, morning serum total testosterone 400 ng/dl or less) with confirmed lack of response to sildenafil monotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive a daily dose of 1% T-gel or 5 gm placebo gel as adjunctive therapy to 100 mg sildenafil during a 12-week period. Subjects were evaluated for sexual function, primarily based on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), quality of life and serum testosterone levels at baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12. RESULTS: Testosterone treated subjects had greater improvement in erectile function compared to those who received placebo, reaching statistical significance at week 4 (4.4 vs 2.1, p = 0.029, 95.1% CI 0.3, 4.7). Similar trends were observed for improvements in orgasmic function, overall satisfaction, total IIEF score and percentage of IIEF responders. T-gel significantly (p < or =0.004) increased total and free testosterone levels throughout the study, although no significant correlations were made between testosterone levels and the IIEF at end point. CONCLUSIONS: T-gel taken with sildenafil may be beneficial in improving erectile function in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction who are unresponsive to sildenafil alone.     

Sildenafil citrate treatment for erectile dysfunction after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to analyze the morbidity of organic erectile dysfunction (ED) in kidney-transplant patients and to evaluate the efficacy and reliability of sildenafil citrate treatment. METHOD: Sixty-five ED patients with normal graft function for 3 to 12 months after kidney transplantation were involved in our study. Erectile dysfunction was diagnosed in all the patients by the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF). Among them, 10 patients were in light degree; 32 patients in moderate degree, and 23 patients in severe degree according to IIEF score. All of the patients underwent medical history, physical and chemical examinations. In each patient, the IIEF score, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and trough concentrations of cyclosporine were compared before and after taking sildenafil citrate at an initial dose of 50 mg every night. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients without ED before transplantation suffered ED after the operation, and 32 patients with ED before transplantation noticed worsening. Taking sildenafil citrate was effective in 53 patients (81.54%). There were no statistical differences in blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, or trough concentrations of cyclosporine in patients before and after sildenafil treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity of organic erectile dysfunction increased after transplantation. Sildenafil citrate treatment for ED in kidney-transplant patients was effective and safe. Graft function and trough concentrations of cyclosporine were not affected by sildenafil citrate.     

Sildenafil in the treatment of sexual dysfunction in spinal cord-injured male patients

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in spinal cord-injury (SCI) patients. Moreover, we looked for neurological conditions permitting therapeutic success and for the ideal dose needed to achieve sufficient erections. METHODS: 41 SCI patients were prospectively examined. Sexual dysfunction was assessed by means of anamnesis, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and neurological examination. Psychogenic erection capacity was tested by audiovisual stimulation and reflexive erection using a vibrator device. Neurophysiological recordings and cystomanometry were performed in parallel to clinical examinations. Neurophysiological recordings included sympathetic skin responses (SSR), pudendus somatosensory evoked potentials (pSSEP), and bulbocavernous reflex (BCR). Urodynamics aimed at classifying the neurogenic bladder dysfunction (upper motoneuron lesion versus lower motoneuron lesion). Intracavernous injection tests with PGE1 were performed in all patients to exclude major organic disease. 50 mg sildenafil was first given 3 times. Thereafter, the doses were adapted according to patients' reports. RESULTS: Clinically, 28 subjects preserved either reflexive erections (24) or psychogenic erections (4), 11 had both types and only 2 presented with a complete loss of erection. 38 patients (93%) had a positive response to sildenafil and reached a penile rigidity sufficient to permit sexual intercourse. 3 patients dropped out because of non-response despite having increased the dosis up to 100 mg. 22 patients (58%) showed functional erections 1 h after 50 mg sildenafil, whereas 14 (37%) required higher doses of 75-100 mg. By comparing the IIEF questionnaire scores before and after therapy, there was a significant improvement in erectile function and intercourse satisfaction from 9.2+/-4.4 SD) and 4.5 (+/-2.5 SD) to 25.5 (+/-4.2 SD) and 10.5 (+/-2.1 SD) points, respectively (p<0.05). Nearly 10% (4/41) suffered from side effects such as headache or dizziness. Two of them stopped therapy because of the side effects. At least 36 patients (88%) continue treatment with sildenafil. Absence of both psychogenic (nonsomesthetic supraspinally elicited) and reflexive (somesthetic spinally elicited) erections, confirmed by urodynamical and electrophysiological findings (SSR perineum, BCR and pSSEP), seems to exclude a successful treatment. In contrast, SCI male patients with preserved function of at least one component of the erection phenomenon (psychogenic/reflexive) responded well to sildenafil and the dose required to achieve erections sufficient for sexual intercourse did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil proves to be a valuable and safe therapeutic management in ED of SCI patients. Therefore, patient acceptance and satisfaction are high. The most common dose required to achieve a satisfying erection is 50 mg. The efficacy of sildenafil depends on sparing of either sacral (S2-S4) or thoracolumbar (T10-L2) spinal segments which, in this study, have been shown to be of relevance in mediating psychogenic erections in male SCI patients. Complete disturbance of any neurogenic impulses excludes successful treatment.     

Antioxidant treatment associated with sildenafil reduces monocyte activation and markers of endothelial damage in patients with diabetic erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the synergic effect of propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) plus sildenafil in reducing monocyte oxidative activity and endothelial dysfunction markers in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Thirty-two type 2 diabetic patients with ED (according to the International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5]) were randomized to receive PLC (2 g/d) alone (n=8) or combined with sildenafil (50 mg/d twice weekly) (n=8), sildenafil alone (50 mg/d twice weekly) (n=8), or placebo (n=8) in a double-blind, fixed-dose study. Monocyte oxidative activity (stimulation index [SI]), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1], P-selectin, advanced glycation end product (AGE) levels, Doppler sonography (recording peak systolic velocity [PSV]; end diastolic velocity [EDV]; systolic wave time [SWT]; resistive index [RI]), and IIEF score were evaluated before and after 12 wk of treatment; IIEF-5 was evaluated again 4 wk posttreatment. RESULTS: SI was reduced by treatment with PLC alone or combined with sildenafil (p<0.05). In patients treated with PLC plus sildenafil, a decrease in ICAM-1, P-selectin, and EDV values was observed compared with patients treated with sildenafil alone (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, respectively). IIEF-5 improved in all patients treated with PLC plus sildenafil or sildenafil alone (p<0.03, p<0.05, respectively). Four weeks posttreatment, patients treated with PLC plus sildenafil maintained the improvement of the IIEF-5 compared with patients on sildenafil alone (p=0.05). In patients on PLC treatment (with or without sildenafil), SI was correlated with IIEF-5 (p<0.001), glycemia with STW (p<0.03), and AGEs with IIEF-5 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: PLC plus sildenafil was more effective in reducing SI and endothelial dysfunction markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and ED.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil for treating erectile dysfunction in patients on dialysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients on haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), as men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) often have sexual dysfunction (up to 82% among those on chronic dialysis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with ED and in ESRD participated in an open-label prospective study. Thirty patients on HD and 11 on PD were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Fugl-Meyer life-satisfaction scale before and after sildenafil treatment. A total score in the erectile function domain of < or = 25 was accepted as indicating ED. All patients were started on a 25-mg dose, which was increased to 50 mg if there was no response after two trials. In addition, the overall efficacy question was used to evaluate satisfaction, and patients reported any side-effects during treatment. RESULTS: The erectile function and intercourse satisfaction domains improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). After sildenafil treatment, two-thirds of those on HD (20/30) and nine of the 11 on PD recovered their erectile function. The pretreatment scores on the IIEF and four domains (except sexual desire) of those responding were significantly higher than in those not responding (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate on the overall efficacy question was 80% and 82% for the HD and PD groups, respectively. At least one side-effect was seen in 17 patients (43%); one had severe hypotension in the PD group. Overall, mild headache (seven patients, 18%) and flushing (12, 30%) were reported most often. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is a safe and satisfactory drug for improving erectile function in patients with ESRD. Patients were satisfied whether treated by HD or PD. Pretreatment scores on the IIEF may be useful for predicting the success of treatment.     

Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of therapeutic success with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with different spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, open, prospective, before-after study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil therapy for erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury, and the association between the response to sildenafil and factors such as causes and levels of spinal cord injury, grade of ASIA deficit, time since injury, orgasmic perception, and degree of baseline erection. SETTING: Homes of outpatients of 16 spinal cord injury units in Spain. METHOD: One hundred and seventy patients with erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury, from whom baseline data were collected on their sexual function, and who started treatment with sildenafil 50 mg. An efficacy assessment was made by the patient and his partner, and the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was recorded. RESULTS: It was reported by 88.2% of the patients and 85.3% of their partners that treatment with sildenafil had improved their erections, regardless of the baseline characteristics of the spinal cord injury and erectile function. In responders, this improvement was confirmed by an increase from 12.5 to 24.8 points (P<0.001) of the Erectile Function Domain of IIEF. A significant improvement was also seen in patients' satisfaction with sexual activity and general satisfaction derived from sexual life. Preservation of orgasmic perception and a baseline degree of erection of 3 or 4 (P=0.006) were predictors of therapeutic success. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury, regardless of the cause, neurological level, ASIA grade, and time since injury. SPONSORSHIP: Spanish Society of Paraplegia.     

从更好的勃起到更好的性生活:万艾可研究进展

万艾可(枸橼酸西地那非)起效快,使患者达到和维持坚硬的勃起,已被证实为首选的勃起功能障碍(ED)治疗药物。近年来,有关万艾可疗效的研究越来越多地关注其对整体性生活的改善,即对患者心理因素的影响。通过应用心理学评价工具,如勃起功能障碍治疗满意度量表、自尊心和性关系问卷、勃起功能障碍心理影响评分等,研究发现万艾可显著改善以下心理性因素:ED患者及其伴侣对性交和性关系的满意度、患者的自信心和自尊心、与伴侣亲近和进行性交的欲望等。服用万艾可的ED患者性交尝试次数显著增加,健康相关的生活质量显著提高。因此,万艾可产生更好的勃起,进一步促进更好的性生活良性循环。     

The effect of sildenafil citrate and pentoxifylline combined treatment in the management of erectile dysfunction

Introduction In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of sildenafil and pentoxifylline combined therapy in the treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Methods Sixty-eight patients with various degrees and types of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction were included in the study. The patients were recommended to take oral sildenafil (minimum two 50-mg tablets/week) 1 h prior to sexual intercourse for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks of washout period, patients were recommended to take combined therapy (minimum two 50-mg tablets/week sildenafil 1 h prior to sexual intercourse and 1.2 g of pentoxifylline/day divided into three doses) for an additional 4-week period. Both treatment regimes were evaluated with the international index of erectile function (IIEF). Results Mean IIEF score was higher after sildenafil treatment when compared to pre-treatment score (14.2 ± 4.3 and 8.6 ± 4.2, respectively, P < 0.05). Likewise after the combination treatment, mean IIEF score was higher when compared to pre-treatment score (18.1 ± 5.2 and 8.6 ± 3.8, respectively, P < 0.05). The increase in the IIEF score was 5.62 ± 2.08 in the sildenafil only group whereas increase in the IIEF score was 9.51 ± 3.77 in the combination therapy group. There was a statistically significant increase in the combination group when compared to the sildenafil only group (P < 0.001). Conclusion Our study suggests that use of sildenafil citrate and pentoxifylline combined therapy could be effective in the management of patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction.