Complications of surgically treated pelvic ring injuries with associated genitourinary injuries

ObjectivePelvic ring injuries are often associated with vascular and intrapelvic organ injuries including damage to the genitourinary system. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between surgically treated pelvic ring injuries and genitourinary injuries. The primary outcome was to determine the rate of post-operative complications including infection, urinary dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction. The secondary outcome was to determine if the time to surgery was associated with post-operative complications.MethodsRetrospective chart review from September 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 of patients who sustained a pelvic ring injury which required surgical intervention. All patients with closed triradiate cartilage were included.ResultsA total of 115 patients met the inclusion criteria, 12 patients with an associated genitourinary (GU) injury were included in the GU group and 103 without GU injury were placed in the non-GU group. The median (range) age of patients in the GU group was 49.5 years (20, 64) and 48 years (15, 92) in the control group (p = 0.92). Demographic characteristics including age, Injury Severity Score and Elixhauser comorbidity score were similar between groups. Within the GU group, five patients had an injury to their bladder, four to their urethra and three had an injury to their kidney. In the GU group, one patient developed a wound dehiscence and one developed a urinary tract infection with subsequent sepsis (17%), while in the non-GU group, one patient (1%) developed erectile dysfunction (p = 0.028). Regression analysis demonstrated that having concomitant pelvic ring and GU injuries, as well as the number of surgeries were variables associated with post-operative complications, while time to surgery was not.Discussion and conclusionsPelvic ring injuries with concomitant genitourinary injuries were associated with increased odds of post-operative complications. No differences were noted in complication rates due to the time to surgery between groups.     

Brachial plexus injuries associated with cervical spine fractures

The concomitant occurrence of brachial plexus injuries and cervical spine fractures in three recent patients is reviewed. The injuries included a fracture or dislocation of the upper portion of the cervical spine and damage to the upper roots of the brachial plexus. All of the patients had associated head injuries and two suffered a spinal cord injury. Recognition of the brachial plexus injury was delayed in each case because of the associated injuries. Probable mechanisms of injury include forced lateral bending of the cervical spine, with or without rotation, combined with forcible depression of the shoulder. All three patients required surgical fusion and/or halo bracing. Two have persistent Erb-type palsies. Brachial plexus injuries must be suspected in all cervical spine injury patients.     

Flexion-distraction injuries to the lumbar spine associated with abdominal injuries.

Flexion-distraction injuries to the lumbar spine frequently occur with concomitant abdominal viscus injury. We encountered 16 patients with flexion-distraction lumbar spine injuries. Half of them also suffered abdominal viscus rupture. Lap safety belts were most frequently associated with these injuries; however, the incorrect, underarm use of the shoulder harness was common in our series. The diagnosis of the spinal injury was frequently delayed when abdominal viscus injury occurred together with a flexion-distraction spinal injury. Thorough physical and radiographic examination of the spine as well as a detailed history, including seat belt use, is necessary to diagnose these injuries properly.     

Complications in three-column cervical spine injuries requiring anterior-posterior stabilization.

A study was undertaken to elicit the hidden factors that, when identified, would signal the presence of cervical spine instability. Data were derived from the records and radiographs of 21 patients having sustained traumatic injury to the lower cervical spine (C3-C7) and who failed a single-stage posterior stabilization procedure necessitating a second (or combined) anterior-posterior arthrodesis. Mechanism of injury most frequently identified in this group was the distraction-flexion (locked facets) pattern (nine patients) and the "tear drop" compression-flexion injury pattern (seven patients). All 21 patients underwent a posterior wiring and bone graft stabilization procedure with persistent postoperative instability. Thus, failure to recognize the presence of "three-column" instability, the sine qua non of this group, resulted in the failure of posterior tension band stabilization as a means of gaining cervical spine stability. Three-column cervical spine instability is suspected in the presence of: 1) retrolisthesis and angulation of the superior vertebra on the next inferior vertebra; 2) distraction of the posterior interspinous ligaments sufficient to allow subluxation or dislocation of the facets; in conjunction with 3) a "shear" dislocation of one vertebra on another. Anterior shearing force through the disc space is capable of disrupting the intervertebral disc, along with disruption of the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, each contributing to the presence of anterior and middle column cervical spine instability.     

Multiple associated injuries are common with spine fractures during war

Background contextThe nature of concomitant injuries associated with spine fractures in American military personnel engaged in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) has been poorly documented in the literature.PurposeTo characterize the incidence and epidemiology of associated injuries (AIs) in American military personnel with spine fractures sustained during OEF and OIF from 2001 to 2009.Study designRetrospective study.Patient sampleAmerican military personnel who were injured in a combat zone and whose medical data were abstracted in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR).Outcome measuresNot applicable.MethodsThe JTTR was queried using International Statistical Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes to identify all individuals who sustained spine injuries in OEF or OIF from October 2001 to December 2009. Medical records of all identified service members were abstracted to ensure accuracy and avoid duplication. Demographic information, including sex, age, and military rank, were obtained for all patients. Information regarding fracture type, spine region, mechanism of injury, and the presence of AIs was collected for all patients.ResultsSeventy-eight percent of patients with a spine fracture sustained at least one AI, with an average of 3.4 AIs per patient. Musculoskeletal injuries were most common, followed by chest, abdomen, and traumatic brain injuries. Most patients were injured by an explosive mechanism (62%). Head and face traumas were more common with cervical fractures, chest with thoracic injuries, and abdominopelvic injuries with lumbosacral fractures. Pelvis and acetabulum fractures were common after helicopter crashes, tibia/fibula injuries after explosions, thoracoabdominal injuries after gunshot wounds, and traumatic brain injuries after falls. Most patients (76%) sustained multiple spine fractures.ConclusionSpine fractures sustained in OEF and OIF have high rates of AIs. Musculoskeletal AIs are the most common, but visceral injuries adjacent to the spine fracture frequently occur. Multiple spine injuries are more prevalent after military trauma.     

Closed cervical spine trauma associated with bilateral vertebral artery injuries

Bilateral vertebral artery injuries in closed cervical spine injuries are uncommon, but early recognition and treatment are important to prevent neurological deterioration. A case of bilateral vertebral injuries in a 35-year-old motor vehicle accident victim is presented, and the current literature is reviewed.     

Abdominal injuries associated with lumbar spine fractures in blunt trauma

BACKGROUND: Specific analysis of the relationship between abdominal injuries and lumbar spine fractures has not yet been reported. METHODS: A retrospective review of 258 blunt trauma patients with lumbar spine fractures treated between 1991 and 1996. RESULTS: 26 patients sustained concomitant lumbar spine fractures and abdominal injuries. The mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (73%), pedestrian-struck (11%), fall (8%) and assault (8%) resulting in ISS, RTS and mortality of 27 +/- 4, 6.5 +/- 0.4 and 8%, respectively. Forty-four lumbar spine fractures were identified (1.7/pt) in association with splenic (54%), renal (41%), hepatic (32%) and small bowel (23%) injuries and no retroperitoneal involvement. Multilevel lumbar spine fractures were associated with a higher organ injury/fracture ratio compared with single level fractures (p < 0.01) including a twofold higher incidence of solid organ (spleen, liver and kidney) injury (p < 0.01). The level and type of fracture did not affect the incidence of total and individual organ injury. Patients with abdominal injuries were more severely injured mainly due to increased incidence of associated thoracic injuries although no significant difference in mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: Abdominal injuries occurred only in the minority of blunt trauma patients with lumbar spine fractures. These injuries, which followed a similar distribution pattern as in blunt trauma in general, occurred most commonly due to motor vehicle collisions and in association with multilevel vertebral fractures. No correlation with fracture type or level was identified.     

The effect of vehicle protection on spine injuries in military conflict

Background contextTo evaluate the effect of critical time periods in vehicle protection on spine injuries in the Global War on Terror.PurposeTo characterize the effect of method of movement on and around the battlefield during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom from 2001 to 2009 in terms of its impact on the incidence and severity of spinal fractures sustained in combat.Study design/settingRetrospective study.Patient sampleMounted and dismounted American servicemembers who were injured during combat.MethodsExtracted medical records of servicemembers identified in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry from October 2001 to December 2009. Methods of movement were defined as mounted or dismounted. Two time periods were compared. Cohorts were created for 2×2 analysis based on method of movement and the time period in which the injury occurred. Time period 1 and 2 were separated by April 1, 2007, which correlates with the initial fielding of the modern class of uparmored fighting vehicles with thickened underbelly armor and a V-shaped hull. Our four comparison groups were Dismounted in Time Period 1 (D1), Dismounted in Time Period 2 (D2), Mounted in Time Period 1 (M1), and Mounted in Time Period 2 (M2).ResultsIn total, 1,819 spine fractures occurred over the entire study period. Four hundred seventy-two fractures (26%) were sustained in 145 servicemembers who were mounted at the time of injury, and 1,347 (74%) were sustained by 404 servicemembers who were dismounted (p<.0005). The incidence of fractures in the dismounted cohort (D1+D2) was significantly higher than in the mounted cohort (M1+M2) in both time periods (D1 vs. M1, 13.75 vs. 3.95/10,000 warrior-years [p<.001] and D2 vs. M2, 11.15 vs. 4.89/10,000 warrior-years [p<.0001]). In both the mounted and dismounted groups, the thoracolumbar (TL) junction was the most common site of injury (36.1%). Fractures to the TL junction (T10–L3) increased significantly from Time Period 1 to 2 (34% vs. 40% of all fractures, respectively, p=.03). Thoracolumbar fractures were significantly more severe in that there were more Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Magerl Type A injuries versus all TL fractures, 1.75 versus 2.68/10,000 or 27% of all spine fractures in Time Period 1 versus 40% in Time Period 2 (p=.007). Furthermore, there were significantly fewer minor fractures (spinous process and transverse process fractures) (p<.0001). In Time Period 2, significantly more TL spine fractures were classified as major fractures, according to the Denis classification system, in both the mounted and dismounted groups; M1 group, 61 of 226 (27%) versus the M2 group, 86 of 246 (34%) (p<.0005) and 173 of 786 (22%) in the D1 group versus 193 of 561 (34%) in the D2 group. The spinal cord injury (SCI) incidence did not change in the mounted groups in Time Period 1 (7 of 71, 9.9%) versus Time Period 2 (7 of 74, 9.5%) (p=.935). In the dismounted groups, SCI actually decreased from D1 (55 of 228, 24%) to D2 (28 of 176, 16%) (p=.0428).ConclusionsThe incidence of spine fractures and SCI is significantly higher in dismounted operations. The data suggest that current uparmored vehicles convey greater protection against spinal fracture compared with dismounted operations in which servicemembers are engaged on foot, outside their vehicles. The TL junction is at greatest risk for spine fractures sustained in mounted and dismounted combat operations. Recently, the incidence of TL fractures, especially severe fractures, has significantly increased in mounted operations. Although there has been an increased incidence of TL spine fractures, in context of the number of servicemembers deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom, these severe fractures still represent a relatively rare event.     

Vertebral artery injuries associated with cervical spine injuries: a review of the literature

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of vertebral artery injuries (VAIs) in association with cervical spine trauma and investigate the optimum diagnostic and treatment protocols. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: VAIs may result from cervical spine trauma and have the potential to cause cerebral, brainstem, and even spinal cord ischemia. Screening and treatment for traumatic VAI are very controversial, with conflicting recommendations within the trauma and spine literature. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify publications pertaining to VAIs associated with cervical spine trauma. These publications were evaluated to determine the incidence, radiographic evaluation, and treatment options of VAIs. RESULTS: Approximately 0.5% of all trauma patients will have a VAI, and 70% of all traumatic VAIs will have an associated cervical spine fracture. Cervical spine translation injuries and transverse foramen fractures are most commonly cited as having a significant association with VAIs. The incidence of neurologic deficits secondary to VAI ranges from 0% to 24% in published series that incorporate a screening protocol for asymptomatic patients. Catheter angiography has been the gold standard for the diagnosis of VAIs; however, new 16-slice computed tomography angiography seems to have sensitivity and specificity close to that of catheter angiography. Treatment options include observation, antiplatelet agents, anticoagulation, and endovascular treatments. Although some authors have advocated antithrombotic therapy for most asymptomatic VAIs, there is a lack of class I evidence to support any strong guidelines for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: VAIs can occur in association with cervical spine trauma and have the potential for neurological ischemic events. Screening for and treatment of asymptomatic VAIs may be considered, but it is unclear based on the current literature whether these strategies improve outcomes.     

Injuries of the spine and spinal cord associated with other injuries]

In the article is presented an analysis of treatment of 28 patients with wounds of spine and spinal cord, associated with the other extravertebral damages. The author considers these wounds to be the most severe damage and treatment of patients of the kind should be performed with participation of the related specialists, provided with the urgent complex, instrumental examination and with due regard for the degree of criticism of wounded person. Methods and terms of treatment are strictly individual with regard to the degree of criticism of spine and associated injury.     

颈椎骨折脱位并发的椎动脉损伤

目的：分析颈椎骨折脱位并发的推动脉损伤的发生率及易发因素,方法：11例颈椎骨折脱位患者均接受颈椎MRI及颈部磁共振血管成像（MRA）检查。结果：3例合并有椎动脉损伤（均为单侧）,由屈曲暴力致伤及存在小关节脱位。嵴髓损伤均为A级（ASIA标准）。结论：颈椎骨折脱位可能并发椎动脉损伤、脊髓完全性损伤及颈椎小关节脱位患者,应常规进行MRA检查,以明确是否合并椎动脉损伤。     

Cervical spine injuries in patients with head injuries

It is generally believed that significant head injury after a traffic accident or fall is associated with a high incidence of concurrent cervical spine injury. This study prospectively examined 260 victims of traffic accidents or falls with significant head injury. The incidence of associated cervical spinal injury was only 3.5 per cent. There was no association between the severity of head injury and the incidence of cervical spine injury. The risk of concurrent spinal injury in head injury patients is not higher than the reported risk in patients without head injury. Although care should be taken to protect the cervical spine in patients with head injury, the results of the present investigation show that the risk of cervical spine injury is much less than previously reported.     

颈椎骨折脱位合并椎动脉损伤

目的　探讨颈椎骨折脱位与椎动脉损伤的相关性。方法　 2 0例闭合性颈椎创伤患者 ,同时接受颈椎MRI和椎动脉磁共振血管成像 (MRA)检查。结果　 2 0例闭合性颈椎损伤中 ,5例无椎动脉血流成像 ,均为单侧 ,左侧 2例 ,右侧 3例。其中颈椎骨折 3例 ,单侧小关节脱位 1例 ,无放射影像的异常脊髓损伤 1例。 4例椎动脉损伤患者无任何症状 ,1例有轻度头昏、嗜睡。结论　颈椎骨折脱位可并发椎动脉损伤 ,由于缺乏特异性症状 ,前瞻性MRA检查是最重要的方法。     

Complications of halo treatment for cervical spine injuries in patients with ankylosing spondylitis--report of three cases

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis are prone to injuries of the cervical spine even with minor trauma. Although the fractures are markedly unstable, nonsurgical treatment using a halo-thoracic plaster or jacket is a common approach. METHODS: We present three patients with cervicothoracic fractures of the ankylosed spine to describe problems and complications inherent in this type of treatment. In two, pin track infections and pin protrusion through the skull occurred, leading in one case to an intracerebral hemorrhage. In the third patient, the halo had to be removed after 8 months, just early enough to prevent the pins from cutting through. RESULTS: One patient required craniotomy. The second one could be resolved by local revision. In the third case, the fracture eventually united after using a stiff collar for 2 years. CONCLUSION: Halo treatment for cervical spine fracture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is a challenging task for orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons.     

Identification of concomitant injuries associated with specific spine level fractures in polytrauma patients

IntroductionSpine fractures are associated with high energy mechanisms and can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality in the trauma setting. Rapid identification and treatment of these fractures and their associated injuries are paramount in preventing adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify concomitant skeletal and non-skeletal injuries related to cervical, thoracic, and lumbar fractures.MethodsA retrospective review of institutional American College of Surgeons (ACS) registry was conducted on 3,399 consecutive trauma patients identifying those with spine fractures from 1/2016–12/2019. Two-hundred ninety patients were included(8.5%) and separated into three groups based on fracture location: eighty-eight cervical(C)-spine, 129thoracic(T)-spine, and 143lumbar(L)-spine. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associated injuries, presenting injury severity score(ISS) and Glasgow coma scale(GCS), mechanism of injury, demographic data, substance use, and paralysis for each group. Cox hazard regression was utilized to identify factors associated with inpatient mortality.ResultsC-spine fractures were associated with head trauma(OR2.18,p = 0.003),intracranial bleeding (OR2.64,p = 0.001),facial(OR2.25,p = 0.02) and skull fractures(OR3.92,p = 0.001),and cervical cord injuries(OR4.78,p = 0.012). T-spine fractures were associated with rib fractures(OR2.31,p = 0.003). L-spine fractures were associated with rib(OR1.77, p = 0.04), pelvic(OR5.11,p<0.001), tibia/fibula (OR2.31,p = 0.05), and foot/ankle fractures(OR3.32,p = 0.04), thoracic(OR2.43,p = 0.008) and retroperitoneal cavity visceral injuries(OR27.3,p = 0.001). Falls≤6meters were also significantly associated with C-spine fractures(OR1.70,p = 0.04) while falls>6meters were associated with L-spine fractures(OR4.30,p = 0.001). Inpatient mortality risk increased in patients with C-spine fractures(HR4.41,p = 0.002), higher ISS(HR1.05, p<0.001), and lower GCS(HR0.85,p<0.001). Last, patients≥65-years-old were more likely to experience C-spine fractures(OR1.88,p = 0.03).ConclusionPatients who experience fractures of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine are at risk for additional fractures, visceral injury, and/or death. Awareness of the associations between spinal fractures and other injuries can increase diagnostic efficacy, improve patient care, and provide valuable prognostic information. These associations highlight the importance of effective and timely communication and multidisciplinary collaboration.     

Flexion-distraction injuries of the lumbar spine and associated abdominal trauma

Recent experience with flexion-distraction injuries of the lumbar spine associated with blunt abdominal trauma and the use of a lap belt alone has caused us to review our experience over the last 7 years. Eighteen patients were identified, with an average age of 22 years, and an average followup of 34 months. Fifteen were involved in motor vehicle accidents, with 11 being single-vehicle accidents. Of note, 12 of the 15 were rear seat passengers with lap belts only. Twelve patients suffered abdominal injury, seven requiring operative intervention, mainly for hollow viscus injury. In three patients, a delay of 24 hours or more occurred before recognition of intra-abdominal pathology requiring surgical therapy. One patient had an unrecognized spinal fracture for 2 weeks after abdominal surgery for a perforated viscus. The spinal injury was carefully assessed and analyzed for prognostic factors. Six were graded excellent, five good, four fair, and one poor. One case of paraplegia associated with avulsion of the spinal cord from distraction is reported. Prognostic factors included the amount of facet joint involvement and the degree of initial kyphosis. Those having greater than 17 degrees of kyphosis had a poor prognosis. Early recognition of the constellation of injuries involving the spine and abdomen associated with the use of the lap belt is recommended with surgery to the spinal fracture as outlined.